An ‘early child activist’ wants Father’s Day in Australia to be renamed ‘Special Person’s Day’ to be more “inclusive” to children in “special communities” who do not have fathers.

Australian academic Red Ruby Scarlet, convenor of the Social Justice in Early Childhood Activist Group, told todaytonight’s host that scrapping Father’s Day in favour of a non-specific ‘Special Person’s Day’ was not political correctness, but about “rights”.

“Why are they calling this political correctness when it’s in fact about our rights?” said Dr. Scarlet.

She claimed that “shifting the language around emotive days” makes school more “inclusive” to children from “special communities” including single parent families and same-sex parent families.

Host Rosanna Mangiarelli noted that a “growing number” of politically correct schools and kindergartens were adopting the move and asked the childhood activist what kind of feedback she was getting from parents and teachers.

The activist dismissed the backlash from parents who support traditional days honouring mothers and fathers saying: “[There has] not [been] a backlash from people in those [special] communities.

“It’s people outside of those particular contexts [who object the Special Persons Day].”

Catch Up: The push to rename Father’s Day “Special Person’s Day”. Is it political correctness gone mad? @RosannaMangiare http://pic.twitter.com/zE1JmvU0rX

— TodayTonightAdelaide (@TodayTonightSA) August 23, 2017

This is not the first time educators in Australia have attempted to wipe celebrations honouring traditional families or parental figures.

In May, Moonee Ponds West Primary School principal Jeff Lyon decided that his school would abandon Mother’s Day celebrations and mark the UN International Day of Families instead.

“I believe celebrating International Day of Families is a more inclusive way of celebrating the richness, diversity and complexity of living and loving as a family in the modern world,” said Mr. Lyon at the time.

The decision was later reversed following intervention by Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, whose electorate includes the Melbourne school.

Monumental Stupidity: Aussie PM Attacks ‘Stalinists’ Campaigning Against Historic Monuments https://t.co/DowJCV5pRa

— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) August 25, 2017

Leftists have raised opposition to other aspects of Australia’s culture in recent weeks with calls to change the wording on colonial-era monuments and to end the country’s national holiday, Australia Day, referred to by Aboriginal activists as “Invasion Day”.

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook and Twitter.

Liberals are buzzing because unconfirmed reports are that President Trump is going to end Obama’s DACA nonsense. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals was the previous president’s amnesty for 800,000 illegal aliens who were brought to this country as children by their piece of shit illegal alien parents. Under the program, illegal aliens were granted temporary relief from deportation and granted work permits. According to a writer from Rolling Stone, if you support the end of this ridiculous program, you are a racist.

Jesse Berney writes for Rolling Stone because that leftist magazine stopped being about music a long time ago. He is of course a liberal freak and is outraged over something that Trump hasn’t done, but might do.

The only reason to be happy about Trump ending DACA is that you’re a racist. There’s literally no other reason.

— Jesse Berney (@jesseberney) August 31, 2017

“The only reason to be happy about Trump ending DACA is that you’re a racist. There’s literally no other reason,” wrote Berney.

Liberals are so absolute in their bullshit. Isn’t it possible that some people could be happy with ending a program that circumvents our immigration laws to reward people for breaking the law? Is it beyond the realm of possibility that a person could be glad that we are finally enforcing our existing laws? Is it that hard to imagine that some people in this country are pleased that we are asserting our sovereignty and protecting our borders? No, it’s totally racism.

Bernie wasn’t quite done:

“These kids are American. They grew up here. And we’re sending them to a strange place with nothing. It’s cruel and despicable,” wrote Berney.

Well no, they are not American and that’s the problem. There is a right way and a wrong way to immigrate to this country and these ones took the wrong way. Even Obama didn’t make these illegal aliens American citizens, because they are not and don’t have any right to that.

“They speak English, they’re educated, they pay taxes — and for the most part, they’re brown. That’s the reason Trump and his supporters want them gone. That’s why he wants to build a wall between us and them. They’re brown,” concluded Berney.

This is such a bullshit liberal argument. People are not excused from following the law because of the color of their skin. Illegal aliens don’t get deported because they are brown, it happens because they are breaking the law. The same is true for Asian illegal alienss, European illegal aliens, and illegal aliens from anywhere of any race, creed, or color. It just so happens that most of these law breakers are Hispanic.

You will notice in this liberal argument that there is no effort to even try to say any of these illegal aliens are in compliance with the law and that’s because they are not. Liberals literally believe that enforcing existing laws is an act of racism and that’s why they are idiots who should never be in charge of anything.

Also, how much do you think liberals would support illegal immigration if illegal aliens all illegally voted for Republicans? If that were the case, suddenly it would be racist to support illegal immigration.

Me? I’m happy that Trump might end DACA because a country without borders is no country at all. I’m ecstatic that for the first time in my lifetime we are finally enforcing our immigration laws. That doesn’t make me a racist, it makes me an American.

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

From Matt Stoller, writing at the Huffington Post:

My group, the Open Markets Program at New America, researches and studies monopoly power. Barry Lynn began this research 15 years ago, and has been building the necessary intellectual and historical grammar to understand the deep dysfunction in our corporate and political sectors. In response to the EU decision, Lynn sent a statement lauding the action. In response, Google had our group kicked out of our parent think tank, New America. Ken Vogel at the New York Times did the story on the specifics of how this happened. The combination, of the misbehavior in the search market and the attempt to suppress research into how Google operates, shows that the actual issue at hand is one of political power.