Fed up with the NFL’s ongoing national anthem protests, one fan has attempted to strike back by filing a suit against the New Orleans Saints in the hopes of recouping the thousands of dollars he spent on season tickets to the team’s games.

Louisiana resident Lee Dragna filed a suit in a district court Monday “seeking a refund for the tickets as well as attorney’s fees, claiming the protest by some players against police brutality and racial injustice has prevented him and his family from enjoying the games,” reported the The New Orleans Advocate.

Despite spending $8,000 on season tickets, Dragna hasn’t attended a game since the Saints’ first home game of the season on Sept. 17, when some players on the team avoided honoring the national anthem by remaining in the locker room as it played, according to the Advocate.

“Apparently, these players were following the lead of (former San Francisco 49ers quarterback) Colin Kaepernick by disrespecting the flag, the anthem, the USA and those who have served and are serving the USA in our military,” Dragna’s suit states, according to the Advocate.

When the absent players finally walked out onto the field, Dragna’s family watched in horror as furious fans “booed and cursed at the Saints players.”

TRENDING: Lindsey Vonn Suffers Brutal World Cup Injury After Trashing Trump

He noted in a statement to the Advocate that this behavior was “borderline dangerous,” though he laid the blame for it squarely on the shoulders of the Saints.

“The Saints created that behavior by condoning it,” he said. “It’s my thought pattern that (players) should not be allowed (to protest). If you sell tickets to a gaming event for entertainment, you should not be allowed to turn it political.”

Besides creating a hostile environment, the team’s protests have also cultivated the impression that it’s OK to act like a disrespectful punk, Dragna argued.

“I don’t want my kids growing up thinking that those are their heroes … and it’s OK to do that stuff, especially on TV and especially on your job site,” he said. “That can’t be allowed to happen.”

While $8,000 is admittedly a very small price to pay for a team worth countless millions, when Dragna simply asked the Saints for the refund, they rebuffed him.

“They don’t even want to talk about this,” he said. “But I don’t care. One way or another, they’ll pay.”

The Saints have declined to comment about Dragna’s suit, according to the Advocate, though an insider source told ESPN that the team is “taking this very seriously,” and said “this fan best have his facts in order.”

“The Saints will come back at this fan who has brought forth incorrect information in his statement with everything to defend the team, organization and players,” the source added.

RELATED: NFL Coach Goes to Disgusting New Low, Makes Player Comparison to Troops

Saints running back Mark Ingram likewise posted a snarky tweet Tuesday denying Dragna’s claims but wishing him “good luck.”

The one time we protested an anthem was an away game. After a team meeting we decided to kneel as one BEFORE the anthem was played and STAND united as one DURING the anthem! Good luck dude ✌? https://t.co/28huwGP0Pu

— Mark Ingram II (@MarkIngram22) December 13, 2017

For a man worth millions, Ingram could easily resolve this himself by paying Dragna the $8,000 out of his own pockets.

As of Wednesday, however, it appeared neither the team nor its players, including Ingram, had any intention of resolving this mess the easy way.

H/T Yahoo News

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about this man’s lawsuit against the New Orleans Saints.

What do you think will happen with this case? Scroll down to comment below!

Two months ago former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly revealed the existence of a tape that he claims shows what he described as “an anti-Trump attorney” offering a woman $200,000 during the presidential election last year to issue false sexual harassment claims against then-GOP nominee Donald Trump.

“It exists,” he said to Newsmax at the time. “We have urged the person who has the tape to hand it over to the U.S. attorney, because my investigative team believes there are three separate crimes on the audio tape.”

On Friday, O’Reilly doubled down on that claim during an interview with conservative talk show host Glenn Beck, though he declined to offer a deadline for when the tape might finally be released.

“There is an audiotape of an anti-Trump person offering $200,000 to a woman to accuse Donald Trump of untoward behavior,” he said.

When Beck asked whether this tape will ever be released, O’Reilly replied by maintaining that he “may have to go to the U.S. attorney” himself.

TRENDING: Lindsey Vonn Suffers Brutal World Cup Injury After Trashing Trump

“I don’t want to have to do that and inject myself into the story … but I had my lawyer listen to the tape,” O’Reilly said. “There are at least three crimes on the tape. So as a citizen, I may have to do this.”

He cautioned, though, that the tape isn’t in his possession but rather with “someone who knows the seriousness of this situation.”

Then, Beck asked, why won’t this mysterious someone simply release the tape to the public?

“I can’t really get into that at this point, but I can tell you, Donald Trump knows about the tape,” O’Reilly said. “And I, for the life of me, am sitting here going, ‘Why on Earth are you allowing a movement to try to smear you when you have such a powerful piece of evidence that shows this is an industry — that there are false charges and money changing hands?’”

But Trump doesn’t “have such a powerful piece of evidence” at his disposal; the actual owner of the tape does, and until he or she chooses to release the tape, there might not be much the president can do about it.

Listen to O’Reilly’s full statement to Beck below:

Keep in mind that the former Fox News host first mentioned this tape two months earlier, and yet it still remains unpublished.

RELATED: Man Pleads Guilty After Targeting Trump in Disturbing Attack on His Personal Life

My honest recommendation to O’Reilly would be to try his hardest to obtain a copy of the tape and then simply distribute the copy to conservative media.

The fact is that talk is cheap, and allegations come easy. It’s only surefire, indisputable evidence that’ll make any difference against the left’s ongoing war on our president.

H/T BizPac Review

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about Bill O’Reilly’s claim about a tape that shows “an anti-Trump attorney” offering a woman $200,000 to smear Trump.

What do you think O’Reilly should do about this tape? Scroll down to comment below!

The annual Army-Navy football game was held in Philadelphia on Saturday, and while there is always some good-natured ribbing between the rival service academies, this year it seemed a bit more pointed than usual.

It would appear that the U.S. Navy’s midshipmen hadn’t forgotten about the pictures that circulated online a few months back which featured a graduate of the West Point Military Academy — Army 2nd Lt. Spenser Rapone — wearing a Che Guevara shirt under his uniform and a note inside his cap that read “Communism will win.”

According to The Daily Caller, some of the midshipmen hung a banner which boldly declared “Not Communists,” and one individual was spotted holding up a sign that read “Communism won’t win.”

As if that wasn’t enough, it was reported that whenever the Army cadets would attempt to get a chant started, the midshipmen would respond by repeatedly yelling “Communists!” at them.

Army Infantry Officer advocated for communism in uniform. Now the Navy is roasting them at the #ArmyNavyGame

Every time an Army chant starts, they scream “Communists!” http://pic.twitter.com/cKEsyNJNBX

— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) December 9, 2017

TRENDING: These 2 Freeze Frames Likely Show Why the Jury Acquitted AZ Cop Accused of Murder

Newsmax reported that Rapone had not only posted the pictures of himself online, but had also made disparaging remarks about Defense Secretary James Mattis, among other top officials, and had declared himself a member of the Democratic Socialists of America political party.

The social media activity by Rapone has led many to believe that he stands in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, specifically Article 88.

That article reads that “any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the president, the vice president, Congress, the secretary of defense, the secretary of a military department, the secretary of transportation, or the governor or legislature of any state, territory, commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Many people, including Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, have called for Rapone to be decommissioned from the military, and furthermore be compelled to reimburse taxpayers for his tuition and other expenses at the military academy.

It remains unclear at this time what, if any, sort of punishment Rapone — who graduated from West Point in May 2016 — has received for the behavior that riled up so many Americans who despise communism.

According to the Army Times, an official statement from West Point in September said, “Second Lieutenant Rapone‘s actions in no way reflect the values of the U.S. Military Academy or the U.S. Army.”

It was further reported that Rapone had been assigned to the U.S. Army’s 10th Mountain Division, and though the division supports freedom of speech — indeed, its members have fought and bled and died to defend it over the years — its command structure nevertheless noted that it was against regulations for service members to make political statements while in uniform.

“The 10th Mountain Division not only supports free speech, it trains every day to ensure our nation has the ability to protect it at all cost,” stated Lt. Col. Tonya Stokes, according to Army Times. “That being said, when our soldiers are in uniform, politics must be set aside. Our uniform represents every corner of our nation and it cannot be used to promote any single ideology.

RELATED: New US Anti-Nuke Weapon Will Fry NK Missiles Before They Leave Asia

“As figures of public trust, members of the military must exhibit exemplary conduct and are prohibited from engaging in certain expressions of political speech in uniform.”

The Army and Navy are well-known for giving each other a hard time whenever their annual rivalry game comes around, but this year, the Navy wins first prize for hilariously trolling their brothers-in-arms … even if they did ultimately lose the game to Army by one point, 14-13.

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter so everyone can see how the Navy midshipmen trolled the Army cadets over the admitted communist within their ranks.

What do you think of how the Navy trolled the Army over the West Point commie? Scroll down to comment below!

The Bangladesh-born terror suspect who allegedly attempted to detonate a suicide-bomb in New York was able to enter the United States as a foreign relative of an immigrant, extended-family member who had won a visa to the U.S. under the Diversity Visa Lottery.

On Monday 27-year-old Akayed Ullah, a Bangladesh national, injured three individuals when he allegedly tried to detonate a suicide bomb in New York City in a planned terrorist attack.

JUST IN: 27 y/o Terrorist who is from Bangladesh and was living in Brooklyn, told authorities “They’ve been bombing in my country and I wanted to do damage here, Terrorist was also a cab driver. http://pic.twitter.com/vhtfzadgoc

— NYC Scanner (@NYScanner) December 11, 2017

In a statement by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Ullah was able to enter the U.S. in 2011 as a foreign relative after one of his family members was awarded a Green Card in the Visa Lottery.

Every year, the Visa Lottery — championed by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) — gives out 50,000 visas to foreign nationals from a multitude of countries, including those with known terrorist problems – such as Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Syria, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Yemen, and Uzbekistan.

The suspect is originally from Bangladesh and entered the U.S. in 2011 receiving a green card under the fourth family based preference. The Administration has advocated for ending both Chain Migration and the current Diversity Visa lottery program (2/2)

— Tyler Q. Houlton (@SpoxDHS) December 11, 2017

As Breitbart News reported, Ullah was able to obtain a visa as the nephew of his Visa Lottery relative. This process of extended-family mass immigration to the U.S. is known as “chain migration.”

Chain migration allows new immigrants to the U.S. to bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives with them.

Ullah came to the U.S. through the F43 visa, allowing him to obtain a Green Card simply because his father’s brother or sister had recently been allotted a visa under the Visa Lottery.

The left constantly preaches “tolerance”… but it looks like progressives are not actually able to tolerate anything that doesn’t match a pre-set worldview.

That liberal intolerance was on full display over the weekend, when the manager of an on-campus coffee shop at a New York university ordered a group of conservative students to get out of the cafe.

Their “crime”? Daring to order while wearing “Make America Great Again” hats and American flag hats.

Campus Reform reported that a woman who identified herself as a manager of Rodrigue’s Coffee House at Fordham University told several college Republicans that they were not welcome in the shop.

“I am protecting my customers,” declared the unnamed young woman during the confrontation, which was captured on video.

TRENDING: These 2 Freeze Frames Likely Show Why the Jury Acquitted AZ Cop Accused of Murder

“We are your customers, we bought something,” one of the conservative students replied.

“I don’t want people like you supporting this club… no one here wants people like you supporting our club,” the woman declared. “I am giving you five minutes (to leave).”

As an on-campus coffee shop, Rodrigue’s Coffee House is run by a student club.

“You are threatening the integrity of our club,” the manager claimed. “This is a community standard — you are wearing hats that completely violate safe space policy … You have to take it off or you have to go.”

The coffee shop manager insisted that their MAGA hats contained a racial slur. When asked what slur in particular, her response was to shout, “Fascism! Nazis!“

Ah, yes, liberal “tolerance” in action. Wear an official campaign hat of the president of the United States and be kicked out of a shop. How open-minded!

While a private business may have the right to ask a disruptive patron to leave, there’s a major problem in this specific case: Rodrigue’s Coffee House is on the grounds of the university that the customers attend, and the shop’s own policies claim to support inclusiveness.

RELATED: Mom Tries to Prove Bullying Is Happening, Gets Felony Charges Instead

The coffee shop said that it was “open to all,” according to a profile in the college newspaper. 

Rodrigue’s “is the only on-campus club that provides a daily, tangible service to all members of the Fordham community through low-priced, organic and Fair-Trade coffee drinks as well as an open community space,” the profile continued. (Emphasis added.)

“We went there and just started doing some homework and studying. Then we were asked to leave,” one of the conservative students told Campus Reform.

“We are tuition-paying students, therefore we should be able to use any building on campus that we want,” he stated. “This school is over $70,000 a year in tuition, therefore I feel that I have the right to go into all of the buildings that other students are allowed to go into.”

“I also have the right to wear what I want to wear and express my own political views,” he added. In other words, basic free speech.

The university administration acknowledged that the students had a right to be in the coffee shop, and that there is no college policy that allowed them to be removed based on their pro-America or pro-Trump hats.

“Rodrigue’s is a student-operated part of our student-led Campus Activities Board and advised by Student Affairs staff,” Bob Howe, Fordham’s assistant vice president for communications, told The Daily Caller.

“There is no university safe space policy, nor one that excludes any members of the Fordham community from any public spaces on the basis of their political views,” Howe continued.

This is modern liberalism: Hysteria over hats, blatant intolerance of any diverse political views, and an attitude of hatred against anyone who disagrees.

Freedom of expression is under attack, and it’s coming from the left.

H/T BizPac Review

Like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you are fed up with this kind of intolerance!

What consequences should the coffee shop’s manager face? Scroll down to comment below!

Free speech for some, but not for others: That’s what a school district in Minnesota is accused of engaging in after it silenced a conservative group upset over anthem protests.

Now, the district is facing a federal lawsuit from members of the Young Conservatives Club.

The controversy started in November, when a group of liberal students at Edina Public School near Minneapolis protested during both the national anthem and a “taps” ceremony meant to honor soldiers on Veterans Day.

According to USA Today, the conservative student group posted a video speaking out against the protest, objecting to the behavior of several left-leaning young people who had refused to stand to honor veterans.

Several other students who were not members of the conservative club made disparaging comments on the video.

TRENDING: These 2 Freeze Frames Likely Show Why the Jury Acquitted AZ Cop Accused of Murder

A different video posted by anonymous students calling themselves Edina High School Anti-Fascists (antifa) also referenced the Young Conservatives Club, and threatened members of the conservative group.

In response to all of this, the school completely disbanded the Young Conservatives Club.

“Edina High School has essentially declared itself to be ‘Big Brother’ — to ensure that students ‘think correctly’ about the U.S. flag, political and social issues,” Erick Kaardal, an attorney representing the conservative students, told USA Today.

Edina High School Principal Andrew Beaton allegedly told club president Nick Spades that even posting the video of other students protesting the American flag and veterans was a violation of school policies.

“Spade said the principal then demanded he not only delete the GroupMe site, but also disband the Young Conservatives Club or face discipline for being in violation of an unspecified policy,” reported USA Today.

In other words, protesting the American flag is fine in the eyes of the school, but bringing attention to it isn’t permitted.

Associating with “antifa” is allowed, but pointing out disrespect toward veterans crosses the line.

RELATED: NFL Player Rises Above Protests to Give Tribute to Fallen Hero Chris Kyle

“Our club was disbanded … because we were accused of being intolerant of student protesters during a Veterans Day assembly at our school,” Spades said.

The student group’s lawsuit is requesting that the school’s one-sided speech policy be deemed unconstitutional, and for the Young Conservatives Club to be reinstated.

For all the chanting about “tolerance” and “diversity” from the modern left, it looks like it only works one way. Groups that call out protesters are not just criticized but completely demolished, while veterans and the American flag are treated like the enemy.

If all of the conservative group’s claims are accurate, then the school district definitely has some explaining to do in court.

H/T TheBlaze

Please share on Facebook and Twitter if you think the conservative group was wrongly singled out!

What is your response to this school’s decision? Scroll down to comment below!