Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”
The context of when Bump published this piece is important. If you recall, the Washington Post was the news outlet that first broke the story of the Moore allegations, and it was during this time that outside fact-checking of the Post‘s reporting revealed serious lapses, all them pointing to a Moore accuser who manufactured a false narrative.
But in a Friday morning interview on ABC’s Good Morning America, Beverly Young Nelson admitted that she had forged a portion of what she still claims (with no credibility) is truly Moore’s signature. The following exchange is crucially important if you are to understand just how dishonest the Washington Post is:
“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.
“He did sign it,” she replies.
“And you made some notes underneath.”
“Yes,” Nelson admits.
The “notes underneath” she references are the following:
12-22-77
Olde Hickory House
Now, this is why this is so important:
1) This forged portion was used to back up Nelson’s now discredited claim that Moore assaulted her as a 16-year-old.
2) This forged portion — and you are not going to believe this — is the specific part of the inscription the Washington Post’s handwriting expert examined.
Anyone with half a brain and even a dollop of intellectual honesty knew that this portion of the inscription did not match the rest. (Moore denies writing any of it.) I declaratively said so two weeks ago. But here is Bump’s former FBI agent reassuring the public:
“Looking at the yearbook entry,” [Songer] said, “it looks pretty spontaneously prepared” — that is, it doesn’t look like the writer stopped and restarted, as though someone were tentative in writing perhaps because they were trying to imitate another writer. “It looks very fluid. I don’t see any indications of unnatural writing.”
“The writing seems consistent with one writer,” he added, though he pointed out that ‘Old Hickory House’ and the second date appear to be different stylistically — though he’d need to see examples of Moore’s hand-printed writing to be able to determine whether it’s authentic.
This is not only another black eye for Bump, the Washington Post, and all of the mainstream media; it is yet another black eye for an FBI that is increasingly seen as a partisan mob of secret police working hand-in-hand with a corrupt media to overturn elections.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
via Breitbart News
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3
In these trying times, Jackie Mason is the Voice of Reason.
In this week’s exclusive clip for Breitbart News, Jackie questions the effectiveness of sexual harassment training programs for Congressmen who should have learned how not to assault women when they were children… and also wonders why you and I have to pay for it.
“When you’re three years old, you learn how to behave with people,” Jackie explains. “You learn how to control yourself. Your mother follows you around and makes sure you know how to behave so that you don’t touch anybody when they didn’t ask for it, and you don’t tumble people over when they don’t know you, and you control your body and your behavior.”
“Now Congressmen who are 67 years old and 98 years old are being told they have to take training at this age to learn how to behave with women,” Jackie adds. “Do you think this training is gonna be of any help to them? If they’re 95 years old and they still don’t know how to behave, when are they gonna learn, after they pass away?”
Jackie also wonders about reports that Congressmen have used taxpayer funds to settle allegations of sexual harassment or assault.
“Who’s money are they using to defend themselves? My money and yours, they’re using taxpayer money!” Jackie exclaims. “Where the hell did it start that taxpayer money should be used for low-lifes to defend themselves, with our money? I’m asking you a question. Does this have any decency? Does this have any morality, any excuse to exist?”
But Jackie saves perhaps his most pointed criticism for talk show host Chelsea Handler, who earlier this week called White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders a “harlot” who wears “summer whore lipstick.”
“Chelsea Handler. Do you know who she is? Don’t feel bad if you don’t, almost nobody knows who she is,” Jackie says. “This broken-down yenta attacked Sarah Huckabee Sanders. You know why? Because all she knows is that Trump is a conservative and the press is so crazy about attacking any conservative for any reason that she picked her out.”
“Do you know what a harlot even means? It means somebody who’s a low-life. You know why? Because you’re talking about yourself,” Jackie adds. “Use that name for yourself, don’t attack an innocent, decent lady, whose only crime is that you’re not too crazy about her.”
Jackie says it all proves that celebrities “are just plain jerk-offs.”
“Come to think of it, from what’s going on now, jerk-off is a good word, because I mean that literally.”
In ever so lacy, delicate and pious tears-and-flapdoodle language, former President Obama basically suggested President Trump is Hitler. According to the Daily Mail:
Barack Obama appeared to compare Donald Trump‘s presidency to Hitler’s rise to power during a speech in Chicago on Tuesday.
The former president was speaking at an event thrown by the Economic Club of Chicago at a Hilton hotel when he made the remarks.
Without mentioning the current president, Obama told the gathered audience of 1,800: ‘We have to tend to this garden of democracy or else things could fall apart quickly.
‘That’s what happened in Germany in the 1930s, which despite the democracy of the Weimar Republic and centuries of high-level cultural and scientific achievements, Adolph Hitler rose to dominate.
‘Sixty million people died. So you’ve got to pay attention.’
So you see, if you are not paying attention, Hitler will descend upon us, Obama is warning. It’s little different from the rabid ravings of the unhinged left we have seen since the dawn of Antifa, though there is nothing new about Democrats calling Republicans Hitler. They did it to Reagan, they did it to Bush, they did it to Romney. It calls to mind Tom Wolfe’s
about the leftist hysteria he encountered in the late 1960s or early 1970s on the lecture circuit, which he summed up as: “The dark night of fascism is always descending in the United States and yet lands only in Europe.”
Trump? Hitler? Obama’s hint comes at a funny time, given that President Trump has just announced the relocation of the U.S. embassy in Israel to its rightful place, the capital of Jerusalem. It’s something president after president has promised to do, but only Trump has had the guts to do.
Takes quite a bigtime Nazi to do that one, something none of Obama’s leftist and Islamofascist admirers, come to think of it, are happy about.
The reality is, Obama had a far closer orientation to Hitler than Trump ever will. Here’s a choice tweet laying it out:
Obama compared Trump to Hitler yesterday.
Hitler was a control freak.
He owned the media.
He hated capitalism, free speech, and personal gun ownership.
He divided people by race & did all he could to harm the race he hated most.
Obama spied on the press. He attempted government takeovers of whole industries – from banking to health care, while attempting to drive others out of business – such as coal and offshore oil drilling. His wife tried to foist a ‘healthful’ menu on our kids, which in reality was bad food. He was the most racially divisive president since Woodrow Wilson, his fellow Democrat. He tried to disarm the public.
All of these things are indistiguishable from fascism, for anyone who knows anything about it. I would wager that Obama, always a lazy student, didn’t. But more to the point, it’s projecting, something the Obamatons are experts at doing.
Dinesh d’Souza has a fine piece on Youtube on where fascists and Nazis come from, pointing out that fascist thinking closely parallels the thinking of the left.
D’Souza knows about this stuff, given that he was hit with Obama’s draconian ‘justice’ over a minor campaign finance violation in contravention to previous practice, in response to a negative documentary he did on Obama’s third world orientation.
In ever so lacy, delicate and pious tears-and-flapdoodle language, former President Obama basically suggested President Trump is Hitler. According to the Daily Mail:
Barack Obama appeared to compare Donald Trump‘s presidency to Hitler’s rise to power during a speech in Chicago on Tuesday.
The former president was speaking at an event thrown by the Economic Club of Chicago at a Hilton hotel when he made the remarks.
Without mentioning the current president, Obama told the gathered audience of 1,800: ‘We have to tend to this garden of democracy or else things could fall apart quickly.
‘That’s what happened in Germany in the 1930s, which despite the democracy of the Weimar Republic and centuries of high-level cultural and scientific achievements, Adolph Hitler rose to dominate.
‘Sixty million people died. So you’ve got to pay attention.’
So you see, if you are not paying attention, Hitler will descend upon us, Obama is warning. It’s little different from the rabid ravings of the unhinged left we have seen since the dawn of Antifa, though there is nothing new about Democrats calling Republicans Hitler. They did it to Reagan, they did it to Bush, they did it to Romney. It calls to mind Tom Wolfe’s
about the leftist hysteria he encountered in the late 1960s or early 1970s on the lecture circuit, which he summed up as: “The dark night of fascism is always descending in the United States and yet lands only in Europe.”
Trump? Hitler? Obama’s hint comes at a funny time, given that President Trump has just announced the relocation of the U.S. embassy in Israel to its rightful place, the capital of Jerusalem. It’s something president after president has promised to do, but only Trump has had the guts to do.
Takes quite a bigtime Nazi to do that one, something none of Obama’s leftist and Islamofascist admirers, come to think of it, are happy about.
The reality is, Obama had a far closer orientation to Hitler than Trump ever will. Here’s a choice tweet laying it out:
Obama compared Trump to Hitler yesterday.
Hitler was a control freak.
He owned the media.
He hated capitalism, free speech, and personal gun ownership.
He divided people by race & did all he could to harm the race he hated most.
Obama spied on the press. He attempted government takeovers of whole industries – from banking to health care, while attempting to drive others out of business – such as coal and offshore oil drilling. His wife tried to foist a ‘healthful’ menu on our kids, which in reality was bad food. He was the most racially divisive president since Woodrow Wilson, his fellow Democrat. He tried to disarm the public.
All of these things are indistiguishable from fascism, for anyone who knows anything about it. I would wager that Obama, always a lazy student, didn’t. But more to the point, it’s projecting, something the Obamatons are experts at doing.
Dinesh d’Souza has a fine piece on Youtube on where fascists and Nazis come from, pointing out that fascist thinking closely parallels the thinking of the left.
D’Souza knows about this stuff, given that he was hit with Obama’s draconian ‘justice’ over a minor campaign finance violation in contravention to previous practice, in response to a negative documentary he did on Obama’s third world orientation.
There is a repeated pattern in President Donald Trump’s major policy decisions.
Trump floats a good idea — for example, declaring Jerusalem to be the capital of Israel.
Debate ensues, with the experts telling us that it cannot be done, and the world telling us that it should not be done.
Trump makes the decision anyway, and suddenly all of the terrible things we were told to fear somehow fail to happen.
The world accepts Trump’s choice, adapts to it, and moves on — until the next crisis.
The day after Trump made his historic Jerusalem announcement, amidst predictions of violence and unrest, the New York Timesobserved: “Rallying Cry of Jerusalem May Have Lost Force in Arab World.”
Arab leaders criticized the decision, but in unexpectedly muted terms. There were some riots in the West Bank, as the Palestinian Authority declared “three days of rage.” But three days are not a new intifada, nor a regional war, and will soon be forgotten.
Similarly, earlier in the year, when President Trump decided to pull out of the Paris Climate Accords, the world warned that the very existence of the planet was at stake, and that the United States risked being isolated.
Then, after he had done it, everyone pretended it had been obvious all along that the Paris agreement had achieved very little, and acknowledged that the only country that would have been obligated to bear any real cost had been the U.S.
Likewise on domestic issues, such as immigration. When Trump first issued his executive order on the “travel ban” in January, the nation’s airports were besieged by swarms of leftist protesters, and the “resistance” was born.
The Acting Attorney General, Sally Yates, refused to enforce the order, and became an instant heroine. (One of her admirers, Michael Weissman, would go on to play a key role in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.)
And yet this week, when the Supreme Court upheld the “travel ban” — for the second time — by an overwhelming margin, there was barely a whimper of protest. The 90-day window for the ban had long since passed, giving the Department of Homeland Security time to undertake Trump’s “extreme vetting.”
The damage to our Constitution from the president actually exercising his authority and carrying out his duties to protect the nation never happened.
What President Donald Trump is showing us is that many of the fears we have built up around good and important changes that need to be made are simply illusory. They are fictions created by our enemies; they are doubts sowed by the radicals within who wish to see the American experiment fail. They are apparitions, like the Wizard of Oz, who becomes far less dreadful once an outsider like Dorothy dares to pay attention to the man behind the curtain.
In recent days, Trump has been likened to President Harry Truman, who defied the State Department when he recognized Israel in 1948. But perhaps a more apt comparison would be Truman’s predecessor, Frankin Delano Roosevelt.
FDR is remembered for the famous line from his First Inaugural Address in 1933, when he said: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”
But few quote the rest of the sentence, which is even more powerful (emphasis added): “So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”
Trump was elected to “convert retreat into advance,” to “make America great again.” (Note the parallel, too, to Roosevelt’s campaign song, “Happy Days Are Here Again.”) Like FDR, Trump appeals to our past victories to summon the courage to look past today’s fears. It is difficult to imagine any other candidate doing the same.
Whether his presidency is a success or a failure, Americans will see the world more clearly because of Trump.
Moving to talks about trade and a Brexit transition was crucial for the future of May’s premiership which was thrown into doubt when she lost her party its majority in a snap election in June.
Pro-Brexit Conservative lawmakers rallied around her after the deal, a possible signal that the party – which has been split over EU membership for generations – was not preparing to ditch her immediately.
British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who spearheaded the Brexit campaign, congratulated May, adding that Britain would now take back control of its laws, money and borders.
Cabinet minister Michael Gove, another prominent Brexit campaigner, called it a “significant personal political achievement”, and Suella Fernandes, head of an influential group of Conservatives praised the “pragmatic and flexible” approach.
The Commission’s recommendation that sufficient progress has been made will now go to an EU summit of leaders on Dec. 14-15.
“Prime Minister May has assured me that it has the backing of the UK government. On that basis, I believe we have now made the breakthrough we need. Today’s result is of course a compromise,” Juncker told the hastily-arranged news conference.
May said she expected a formal agreement to be approved at the summit.
“I also look forward to next week’s European Council meeting, where I hope and expect we will be able to get the endorsement of the 27 (member countries) to what is a hard-won agreement in all our interests,” May said.
The commission will now begin work on phase two talks, which cover a transitional exit period, trade and long-term relations with the bloc.
Draft guidelines showed the transition period would last around two years. During that time, Britain will remain part of the customs union and single market but will no longer take part in EU institutions or have a vote. It will still be subject to EU law.
Questions are being raised by some anti-EU activists about the shape a future arrangement with the EU might take. Some are saying that the negotiations will have to put more separation between the two sides if Brexit is to work as intended – give sovereignty back to Great Britain.
But the European economies are too intertwined for Great Britain to achieve a complete break. Instead, Great Britain will cooperate in a common market when it is in their interest – just as any sovereign nation would. Instead of being dictated to from Brussels (actually, Berlin), London will be free to pursue its own economic interests.
Despite the fears of pro-EU activists, the break up is not tearing Europe apart or bankrupting Great Britain. There will be an adjustment period for both sides, but in the end, Great Britain isn’t going anywhere, London will still be the financial services capital it’s always been, and the nation will continue to trade with its friends on the continent.
Great Britain and the European Union have come to a divorce agreement, the first step in separating Great Britain from the EU.
But many obstacles remain regarding trade agreements and the future relationship of Great Britain to the EU.
Moving to talks about trade and a Brexit transition was crucial for the future of May’s premiership which was thrown into doubt when she lost her party its majority in a snap election in June.
Pro-Brexit Conservative lawmakers rallied around her after the deal, a possible signal that the party – which has been split over EU membership for generations – was not preparing to ditch her immediately.
British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who spearheaded the Brexit campaign, congratulated May, adding that Britain would now take back control of its laws, money and borders.
Cabinet minister Michael Gove, another prominent Brexit campaigner, called it a “significant personal political achievement”, and Suella Fernandes, head of an influential group of Conservatives praised the “pragmatic and flexible” approach.
The Commission’s recommendation that sufficient progress has been made will now go to an EU summit of leaders on Dec. 14-15.
“Prime Minister May has assured me that it has the backing of the UK government. On that basis, I believe we have now made the breakthrough we need. Today’s result is of course a compromise,” Juncker told the hastily-arranged news conference.
May said she expected a formal agreement to be approved at the summit.
“I also look forward to next week’s European Council meeting, where I hope and expect we will be able to get the endorsement of the 27 (member countries) to what is a hard-won agreement in all our interests,” May said.
The commission will now begin work on phase two talks, which cover a transitional exit period, trade and long-term relations with the bloc.
Draft guidelines showed the transition period would last around two years. During that time, Britain will remain part of the customs union and single market but will no longer take part in EU institutions or have a vote. It will still be subject to EU law.
Questions are being raised by some anti-EU activists about the shape a future arrangement with the EU might take. Some are saying that the negotiations will have to put more separation between the two sides if Brexit is to work as intended – give sovereignty back to Great Britain.
But the European economies are too intertwined for Great Britain to achieve a complete break. Instead, Great Britain will cooperate in a common market when it is in their interest – just as any sovereign nation would. Instead of being dictated to from Brussels (actually, Berlin), London will be free to pursue its own economic interests.
Despite the fears of pro-EU activists, the break up is not tearing Europe apart or bankrupting Great Britain. There will be an adjustment period for both sides, but in the end, Great Britain isn’t going anywhere, London will still be the financial services capital it’s always been, and the nation will continue to trade with its friends on the continent.
via American Thinker Blog
Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1c2jbfc
Job numbers released today through the end of November show an increase of 2.2 million jobs since last years election and an unemployment rate of 4.1 percent. After the same period under Obama, (4.8) million jobs were lost and unemployment skyrocketed to 9.9 percent!
President Trump’s economic results could arguably be the best all time. The stock market is the highest ever and jobs are being created by the thousands.
Jobs
According to data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, President Trump added a projected 1.9 million jobs in the first eleven months of the year (January through November 2017) and 2.2 million jobs since last year’s election.
The same cannot be said for President Obama’s first eleven months as he lost 4.8 million jobs. Obama was so bad at creating jobs that by the end of his second term he said that jobs were not coming back. This showed in his first eleven months in office because in every month the US lost jobs.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, under President Trump more Americans are in the work force than ever before. Over 160 million Americans are working for the first time in US history. President Trump is working hard to bring good paying jobs back to the US and his efforts are showing historic results. ADP reported 40,000 new manufacturing jobs in November. This was the highest reported monthly amount of new manufacturing jobs in the history of their report!
Manufacturing Renaissance
Talk about promises kept…the revival of American manufacturing is staggering. In the ADP report 40,000 new manufacturing jobs were created in November the highest number ever for the report (back to 2002).
Talk about #winning
Also according to the Bureau of Labor Statisticsthe US unemployment rate this year has been below January’s rate every month (January through September 2017.) The unemployment rate in January 2017 was 4.8 percent and by November it was down to 4.1 percent. These are the lowest rates in 17 years.
President Obama on the other hand again moved in the opposite direction. In his first eleven months as President the US unemployment rate increased every month from 7.8 percent in January 2009 to 9.9 percent by November of 2009.
The mainstream liberal media won’t report this, but when looking at the economy and jobs, the billionaire President Trump is providing a tutorial for any former community organizer that might hope to be President some day.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Thursday laid out evidence pointing to collusion between the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign and the Russians that eventually led to Trump campaign officials being spied on, and he demanded that Attorney General Jeff Sessions either appoint a special counsel or step down.
What is the evidence that Clinton colluded with Russians?
“You gotta go back to the basics,” Jordan explained on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends.” “Remember we got [Robert] Mueller’s special counsel team investigating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russians to influence the election.”
“To date, we have zero evidence of that taking place,” he said.
“But what do we know?” Jordan continued. “We have learned in the last several weeks that the Clinton campaign paid the law firm who paid Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, the MI-6 agent, who paid Russians. The Clinton campaign paid Russians for this report for this dossier, and it’s been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the government taken to the FISA court and became the basis to spy on Americans.”
“So I think that’s what happened, all the evidence points to that as being what took place,” he added, “but [FBI Director] Christopher Wray can clear this all up, the FBI could clear this all up, the attorney general could clear this all up, [Deputy Attorney General Rod] Rosenstein could clear this all up, if they just release the applications and prove I’m wrong. Prove that it didn’t happen. I think it did.”
Jordan went on to say that Sessions doesn’t appear to understand where his own recusal ends and begins, and the congressman challenged him to open a special counsel to investigate these claims against Clinton — or step down.
Jordan reiterated the accusations against Clinton Thursday from Capitol Hill.
“If this happened — government working with one campaign to dress up a fake news report as intelligence, then taking it to a FISA court for a warrant to spy on the other political campaign — that’s as wrong as it gets,” he wrote.
If this happened–government working with one campaign to dress up a fake news report as intelligence, then taking it to a FISA court for a warrant to spy on the other political campaign–that’s as wrong as it gets. And it shouldn’t happen in America. https://t.co/hLLoWBi7wQ
While the mainstream media (MSM) focuses on the fake news Trump-Russia collusion farce, the US is engulfed in the most corrupt event in its history and all roads lead back to former President Obama.
As a matter of fact, the fake Trump investigation is a major piece in the attempted coup d’état currently in place and the MSM’s fake news reporting is part of the Coup.
Just this past week former UN Ambassador John Bolten stated that this is the “First Attempted Coup D’état in US History” –
Bolton is right. This is the biggest challenge to the survival of the country since the Civil War.
Democrats in the 1860’s would rather break up the Union than accept the election of the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln.
Today’s Democrats would rather remove another Republican President, Donald Trump, from office than accept the results of the 2016 election.
Democrats in the 1860’s broke up the Union because they didn’t want to give up their power over the executive branch of government and they didn’t want to end slavery, Democrats today are partaking in their Coup D’état because they don’t want to give up their power over the federal government and don’t want to be put in jail for their crimes committed in the years before the election.
The Obama Administration and the deep state, those individuals in government that have created crimes and continue to commit crimes to support their cause, don’t want President Trump to change the destructive direction in the US. The Obama Administration did all it could to destroy this great nation and hand it over to the world of global elites. President Trump and the Americans that voted for him want to save America and the world by standing for freedom, life, human rights and the pursuit of happiness for all Americans. The US is at a crossing point.
This started long before the 2016 election. The Obama Administration was the most corrupt group of villains in the White House ever. They were involved in numerous crimes and corrupt dealings and efforts to destroy America including covering up their decision not to save four Americans in Benghazi, lying about Obamacare, doubling the US Debt with nothing to show for it, trading the Taliban 5 for a traitor, creating ISIS, giving 20 percent of US uranium to Russia (Uranium One), etc. The list goes on and on.
Then during the 2016 election the Obama Administration took a fake dossier to the FISA court and used it as a means to spy on their political opponent during the election. We now know that the dossier was as fake as a National Enquirer article created by a company known to create nasty, made up accusations against individuals for a significant payout. This dossier was then taken by the FBI to the FISA Court to obtain approval to spy on candidate and now President Trump.
Representative Jim Jordan has many questions that the deep state refuse to answer related to the fake dossier and its use with the FISA Court –
We know that every request to the FISA Court during Obama’s last four years to spy on Americans was signed by former Attorney General Lynch. We also know that Obama’s dishonest spy Chief James Clapper said he knew of every FISA request that was requested and also that no FISA warrants could have been issued without President Obama knowing. We also know that only 1 in 10,000 FISA requests were turned down by the court and this was the first request made by the Obama Administration to spy on Trump. Obama then apparently used the fake dossier to obtain the warrant on Trump. We also know that the entire FISA court was Obama appointees in May of 2016, about the time the court the approved Obama’s request to spy on Trump.
We also know that in March President Trump found out and tweeted –
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
The MSM criticized President Trump for these tweets but now we know he was right. Towards the end of the election Democrats started their propaganda campaign that Trump was in cahoots with Russia. Most Americans knew it was nonsense because they voted for Trump. We don’t know if this was created to protect the Democrats from being caught spying on Trump using known bogus claims, to change the narrative away from their crimes with Russia (Uranium One) or to set Trump up for kangaroo charges after a projected Hillary win. Regardless, as soon as the election was over, Obama’s deep state went into action.
Deep State got their man at Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, and immediately neutered him. They next got deep state operative and corrupt Assistant AG who immediately created a special counsel to look into fake Trump-Russia collusion. The investigation was not based on US law and the man appointed to lead the investigation was none other than Robert Mueller.
We reported in August this year that Mueller is a dirty rotten cop. He was strategically placed in the position of Special Counsel to investigate the Trump-Russia fake news story by his former partner in crime Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. He brought in a team of individuals that are all partisan hacks that worked for the corrupt Clintons and Obama administration.
Mueller is also close friends and partner in crime with the man who replaced him a the FBI, James Comey. In spite of this relationship, and Comey’s obvious involvement in the case, Mueller will not recuse himself from the Trump investigation. The entire investigation is not even based on US law and the Mueller team continues to break the law by leaking information to the press related to this fake investigation. It’s even plausible that the entire investigation is in place to allow Mueller and his team the ability to destroy information related to their past criminal actions.
Now however the deep state’s initiative to take over the country is beginning to fail. They like so many corrupt entities before them went for too much. Thanks to entities like Judicial Watch that are uncovering documents that show the corrupt and criminal actions of deep state and due to diligent reporting from entities like this one (TGP) and Hannity, Breitbart, FOX Business and others, and the efforts of a few honest congressmen, the deep state is being shown for what it is. Numerous corrupt and criminal actions are being reported daily, not by the MSM, but by the new media. We are growing in numbers and respect as the days go by while the fake news Trump-Russia collusion reporting MSM is being abandoned by truth seeking Americans.
President Trump is doing all he can to move ahead with measures that end the Obama Administration’s destruction of America. The President also is well aware of the deep state and reassured Americans that the corrupt leaders of the FBI, DOJ and deep state will be addressed –
After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters – worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness.
After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters – worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness.
Former Republican Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, shared on Hannity that America is at a crossroads –
This is a real fight for whether America is going to remain a republic or that is ruled by law or whether its going to degenerate into being a purely corrupt system of power where if you’re on the right team you can rip everybody off and be protected or if you’re on the wrong team you can be innocent and go to jail.”
Americans are now becoming more aware that the corrupt deep state has burrowed into the federal government in a manner never seen before.
But the deep state will ultimately be destroyed because of one major thing they underestimated. The deep state never counted on the massive silent majority of Americans who have not and will not ever give up on Trump or America!
On Wednesday President Donald Trump Trump came through on his campaign promise and recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. President Trump also announced that he would move the US embassy to Jerusalem.
Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama went to the AIPAC conference as presidential candidates and promised to recognize Jerusalem as the Israeli capital and move the US Embassy to Jerusalem.
“Yesterday, December 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy — the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan … As commander in chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense. But always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.”
Even as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt would give his most historic and portentous speech to the nation — a nation that had just been attacked without warning by a ruthless enemy — he made sure to impress upon every American that “our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.”
It was never about the president. It was always about all of us — especially those of us who sacrificed to ensure freedom survived.
For eight years, the White House sort of forgot that. Every Dec. 7 was, for the Obama family, a bit of a photo opportunity. And they were good at those. Things have changed quite a bit however — including how President Donald Trump commemorates the Pearl Harbor attack.
Here are two of the ways the Obamas commemorated the Pearl Harbor anniversary, at least for public consumption. See if you notice something about how the photos are composed and what the first family is doing in them.
On the left, the Obamas are front and center at the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor back in 2013. There seem to be two men in uniform in the shot. There’s also a quote to commemorate the occasion: “Today, with solemn pride and reverence, let us remember those who fought and died and Pearl Harbor, acknowledge everyone who carried their legacy forward, and reaffirm our commitment to upholding the ideals for which they served.”
It’s totally understandable. I mean, it’s not like there was any other president who gave a famous speech about Pearl Harbor or anything, properly immortalizing the date that would live in infam… oh, wait a minute.
At least in the second one, which is from 2016, Obama went and laid a wreath for the fallen. The first words of the tweet? “Michelle and I.”
Meanwhile, at the White House this year, Pearl Harbor survivors took center stage.
WATCH: “Today, our entire nation pauses to remember Pearl Harbor and the brave warriors who, on that day, stood tall and fought for America,” President Trump said as he honored Pearl Harbor veterans at the White House Thursday. http://pic.twitter.com/V2lbjeFdYc
