Rep DeSantis Rips FBI Director Wray Over ‘Missing’ Strzok Text Messages: “Was Evidence of the Anti-Trump ‘Insurance Policy’ Deleted?”

Rep DeSantis Rips FBI Director Wray Over ‘Missing’ Strzok Text Messages: “Was Evidence of the Anti-Trump ‘Insurance Policy’ Deleted?”

According to the Associated Press, additional text messages sent and received by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok have been handed over to Congress.

The FBI ‘failed to preserve‘ five months of text messages between Trump hating FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page, blaming a technical glitch.

The ‘missing’ Strzok text messages were sent between Dec. 14, 2016 to May 17, 2017, which is the exact same day that Robert Mueller was appointed as Special Counsel.

AP reports:

But the department also said in a letter to lawmakers that its record of messages sent to and from the agent, Peter Strzok, was incomplete because the FBI, for technical reasons, had been unable to preserve and retrieve about five months’ worth of communications.

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) has been on the front lines fighting the Deep State Mueller witch hunt. He is calling for the declassification of all docs related to the Russia dossier including the 4 page FISA memo which will most likely put an end to the Russia hoax once and for all.

DeSantis tweeted on Sunday, “FBI Director Wray needs to provide an explanation for why the FBI deleted six months’ worth of Strozk-Page text messages sent during the Trump transition and early months of the Trump presidency. Was evidence about the anti-Trump “insurance policy” deleted?”

One of the most damning Strzok-Page text messages to surface was the discussion about an “insurance policy” against a Donald Trump victory. Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe was also a part of this discussion.

 “I want to believe the path u threw out 4 consideration in Andy’s office-that there’s no way he gets elected-but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in unlikely event u die be4 you’re 40.”

President Trump previously accused Peter Strzok of “treason“. Is this why the messages have mysteriously gone missing?

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wait.. What? Loretta Lynch Already Knew Comey Would Let Hillary Go Free When Announcing She Would Accept FBI’s Conclusion

Wait.. What? Loretta Lynch Already Knew Comey Would Let Hillary Go Free When Announcing She Would Accept FBI’s Decision

Additional text messages sent and received by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok have been handed over to Congress, reports the Associated Press. According to an exchange between Strzok and Bureau lawyer Lisa Page, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch reportedly knew former FBI James Comey would let Hillary Clinton off the hook in her email investigation, despite stating the Justice Department would hold off on its decision until the FBI weighed in.

AP reports:

They reference Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s decision to accept the FBI’s conclusion in that case and a draft statement that former FBI Director James Comey had prepared in anticipation of closing out the Clinton investigation without criminal charges.

In another exchange, the two express displeasure about the timing of Lynch’s announcement that she would defer to the FBI’s judgment on the Clinton investigation. That announcement came days after it was revealed that the attorney general and former President Bill Clinton had an impromptu meeting aboard her plane in Phoenix, though both sides said the email investigation was never discussed.

Strzok said in a July 1 text message that the timing of Lynch’s announcement “looks like hell.” And Page appears to mockingly refer to Lynch’s decision to accept the FBI’s conclusion in the case as a “real profile in courag(e) since she knows no charges will be brought.”

Lynch is suspected of aiding Clinton during the 2016 presidential election. The former Justice Department head has denied allegations she assured the Clinton campaign that the FBI’s email probe would not stretch far into the 2016 presidential race.

Former FBI Director James Comey testified to lawmakers that he confronted Lynch over what he perceived as a potential tipping of the scales for Clinton during the election. According to reports, when Comey confronted Lynch, he was met with a “steely silence that lasted for some time,” before she asked him to leave her office.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Comey admitted Lynch attempted to reframe the investigation into Clinton’s private email server. The chief legal officer of the United States allegedly directed Comey to refer to Clinton’s email probe as a “matter,” instead of an “investigation” or “probe.”

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Fervent NeverTrumper Does 180 After Year of Massive Trump Successes

She was never a supporter of Donald Trump for president of the United States, but now that she’s seen his success in office, one Republican journalist openly admitted she’s “thrilled” he’s the man in the White House.

Mollie Hemingway, senior editor at The Federalist, wrote a column in The Washington Post to explain why she did not formerly support the president, but now applauds his achievements in office.

Hemingway explained that she expected President Trump to be progressive, liberal, cater towards corporations and fail to keep his promises.

But one year into his presidency, all that has changed.

Hemingway cited Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court as the first turning point.

TRENDING: Stunning: Every Dem. on Intel Committee Votes Against Letting Congress See FISA Memo

Her support for President Trump snowballed from there on.

“He has appointed 12 outstanding federal appellate judges — a record number for a president in his first year,” Hemingway wrote.

“By comparison, President Barack Obama had only three in his first year,” she explained.

The journalist also cited other victories — the U.S. departure from the Paris climate accord, revoking the Clean Power Plan, historic corporate tax reform, victory over the Islamic State group and deregulation as just a few reasons why she now is happy Trump is in the Oval Office.

Have you changed your mind about President Trump?

“If Trump were ever inclined to indulge his liberal tendencies after winning the election, the stridency and spite of his opponents have provided him with no incentives to do so,” she wrote.

“My expectations were low — so low that he could have met them by simply not being President Hillary Clinton. But a year into this presidency, he’s exceeded those expectations by quite a bit. I’m thrilled,” Hemingway concluded.

If Hemingway was able to share her story in such a public way, imagine how many others have changed their minds about President Trump after seeing his massive success in the Oval Office.

Hemingway certainly isn’t the only one. Many Republicans had a hard time getting on board the Trump train, but after Trump’s showed he knew what he was doing in office, they’ve decided to come along for the ride.

RELATED: WaPo Outright Lies About Eric Trump, Selectively Edits Hannity Interview, Then Publishes

And what a ride it’s been. The future only gets better from here.

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter if you support President Donald Trump.

What has President Trump done in office that means the most to you? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Lock Her Up: Judicial Watch Finds “Smoking Gun” in Latest Batch of Hillary Emails

The latest batch of Hillary Clinton’s emails was just released, and it proves she knew exactly what she was doing when she sent classified information over a private email server.

Those 78 pages of emails were released by the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch on Friday.

And there was plenty of proof that Clinton had been “extremely careless” with national secrets, as former FBI Director James Comey described it (in the watered-down version approved by a Clinton supporter in the FBI).

According to Judicial Watch, for instance, on Aug. 24, 2010, Clinton emailed an aide, Justin Cooper, asking him to print classified information, though Cooper had no security clearance to do so.

Cooper had asked State Department IT aide Bryan Pagliano to set up Clinton’s private email server.

TRENDING: Stunning: Every Dem. on Intel Committee Votes Against Letting Congress See FISA Memo

In a June 6, 2011, email, Cooper even warned about security issues with the emails and Clinton’s personal cellular devices, according to Fox News.

“We also have some new security features and policies [sic] that I would like to add to any new berry you have –the most noticeable difference will require a more complex password,” Cooper wrote. “It is a constant fight to keep up with the security measures and unfortunately we keep seeing reminders of why we need to.”

So, even Clinton’s own aides were reminding her of the security issues at stake and she remained oblivious — or utterly uncaring. Obviously, security was not a high priority for the then-secretary of state.

In other emails, they discussed backup emails, how to set up Clinton’s Blackberrys and iPads and other internal information

Will President Trump put Hillary Clinton in jail?

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the newest batch of information proves what Hillary supporters refuse to accept — and what earlier investigations did not get to the bottom of: The proverbial smoking gun.

“The fact that Hillary Clinton and her agents tried to destroy or hide emails shows how she flagrantly and knowingly violated the laws that protect classified information and government records,” Fitton wrote in a Judical Watch news release.

“And these new emails refute Hillary Clinton’s repeated claims of having little or no knowledge about her email system. She clearly was fully in charge of setting up her outlaw email system and overseeing its use.”

You’ll remember, on July 2, 2016, Clinton was interviewed by the FBI about her use of those private email servers. Clinton told the agents she “could not recall” any briefing or training about the retention of records or handling classified information, according to CNN.

RELATED: Fervent NeverTrumper Does 180 After Year of Massive Trump Successes

Is there anyone in America — even Hillary Clinton supporters — who thinks that’s true?

Additionally, according to The Associated Press, in a separate, sworn court filing, Clinton said 21 times that she “did not recall” ever sending classified information over that private server. The emails Judicial Watch released on Friday prove that she did.

As special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has reminded the country, lying to the FBI is a crime — at least when it’s done by Donald Trump Associates.

The last time we checked, lying under oath is perjury. In a federal case, it carries sentence is up to five years in jail — at least when it’s done by someone who’s not named “Clinton.”

It was clear two years ago and it’s clear now: Hillary Clinton has done more than enough to belong behind bars.

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter if you think Hillary Clinton should go to prison.

What do you think about this new batch of emails? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

One Year of Trump: Border Wall Prototypes Sit in Desert As Border-Crossings Surge to Obama Levels

One Year of Trump: Border Wall Prototypes Sit in Desert As Border-Crossings Surge to Obama Levels



A year ago, President Trump committed to the American people to build a wall along the United States-Mexico border to stop illegal immigration and the flow of drugs into the country.

A year later, Trump is still promising to build the border wall, as prototypes of what the wall could look like sit in the San Diego, California, desert and border-crossings surge back to President Obama-era illegal immigration levels.

Since September 2017, eight border wall prototypes have sat in San Diego, being tested by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and toured countlessly by government officials.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen toured the border wall prototypes in December 2017, telling Fox News that the wall was paramount to ending illegal immigration.

“We got to have a wall, we’re going to have a wall. But then you need the technology, you need the people, you need the censors, you need the cameras, you need the monitoring, to make sure that that wall is as effective as it can be,” Nielsen said.

A month later, Nielsen and the Trump administration have continued to struggle to secure the full $18 billion funding for the border wall from a Republican-controlled Congress that remains dedicated to the big business lobby’s interests on immigration, constantly demanding more legal immigration and continued access to illegal alien workers.

While the prototypes continue collecting dust in the San Diego region, border-crossings under Trump have surged back to where they were under Obama, a pattern that proves pro-American immigration reformers’ assertion that talk of cracking down on illegal immigration will only deter illegal immigrants from breaching the southern border for so long.

Between April 2017—when border-crossings hit a historic low—and December 2017, family unit border-crossings have surged 625 percent, Breitbart Texas reported, with the last month of 2017 even exceeding the number of border-crossings under Obama.

In the month of December alone, U.S. Border Patrol agents apprehended almost 30,000 illegal aliens trying to cross into the country between ports of entry, where Trump’s border wall would be sitting if it were constructed today.

As Breitbart News reported, for the last two months of 2017, the Republican establishment, Nielsen, and Democrats have floated the idea of giving amnesty to nearly 800,000 illegal aliens shielded from deportation by the President Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

The mere talk of the DACA amnesty has coincided with surges in border-crossings, with Nielsen admitting last month that human smugglers on the southern border and future illegal aliens pay close attention to the national immigration debate in the U.S. to decide when will be the best time to cross into the country illegally.

Nearing the end of the first month of 2017, the Republican-controlled Congress has yet to hand over full funding for the border wall, and more importantly, have shifted focus to getting DACA illegal aliens a pathway to U.S. citizenship.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder. 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Pussy Hats And Church Hymns: A Tale Of Two Movements

The pro-life movement and the feminist movement could not be more different, and this sharp contrast was on full display over the weekend.

For the very first time, I had the opportunity to attend the March for Life in Washington, D.C.. The crowds were massive – it’s the largest annual human rights march in the world – and the people were cheerful, warm, and full of joy. The theme of the event was, fittingly: “love saves life.”

Families proudly pushed their babies with Down syndrome — an abnormality we, as a society, are urgently told to dispose of — in their strollers with smiles on their faces, former abortion clinic workers held signs proclaiming that life matters, teens chanted about their love for babies and held clever and playful signs, single mothers boasted of the children they chose to keep thanks to pro-life pregnancy centers and religious organizations, a Congresswoman told the masses of the miracle birth of her daughter who was supposed to die upon delivery, and the faithful said prayers aloud in unison and sang church hymns.

The message, “love saves life,” was intricately woven into every beat of the march.

In stark contrast, just one day later, feminists and their soy latte drinking allies took to the streets for the Women’s March. (I was not in D.C. to catch the official march, but I was in NYC, which held a large Women’s March gathering.)

The women were a combination of young virtue-signaling non-victims who long to see themselves as victims, and their elders: women who have followed the rules of feminism and ended up in despair; scorned, alone, and angry.

Apparently, not getting the memo to #resist transphobia, there were more than enough women rocking so-called “pussy hats” to make you want to vomit. Their vulgar signs – many depicting the poop emoji with Trump’s hair vaginas, and penises – and chants called for President Donald Trump’s impeachment for various reasons, none of which were compelling nor grounded in reality and facts. The theme of the event, from what I could gather: buck democracy and oust our duly elected president and kill as many babies as possible in the name of Feminism.

Mind you, this march was toned-down dramatically from last year, when Madonna spoke about her dreams of blowing up the White House and Ashley Judd engaged in painful slam-poetry about her period (among other nonsense).

It was day and night from the annual March for Life on Friday to the Women’s March some 24-hours later. The former was full of love, life, diversity, and joy; the latter, filled with rage, scorn, vulgarities, and hatred – clear indications of what these two movements represent and fight for.

The feminist movement, as exposed through these marches, is off-key and reactionary, often to their own movement’s standards. These women are not fighting for those oppressed and without rights, they’re ignoring such women to advance abortion as some sort of “empowerment” movement and, ironically, preying on our most vulnerable: voiceless babies in the womb.

It’s much nicer on this side, feminists, where we fight for the vulnerable unborn and their vulnerable often abused mothers. Come join us.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Text Messages Reveal Peter Strzok and Mistress Lisa Page Knew Charges WOULD NOT BE FILED Against Hillary — BEFORE She Was Interviewed

Text Messages Reveal Peter Strzok and Mistress Lisa Page Knew Charges WOULD NOT BE FILED Against Hillary — BEFORE She Was Interviewed

The FBI released nearly 400 pages of additional text messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress and former Lisa Page.

As TGP’s Josh Caplan reported earlier today the text exchange between Strzok and Page shows Loretta Lynch knew former FBI Director James Comey was not going to charge Hillary Clinton for her crimes.

Now this…

Strzok and Page also knew charges would not be filed even before Hillary Clinton was interviewed by James Comey on July 4th weekend in

They all knew Crooked Hillary would walk before her interview with Comey!

FOX News reported:

The Justice Department has given various congressional committees nearly 400 pages of additional text messages between two FBI officials who were removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

One of the newly discovered messages, lawmakers said, appeared to indicate that Peter Strzok and Lisa Page knew that charges would not be filed against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as a result of the investigation into her email server — before Clinton was interviewed by the bureau.

Strzok and Page were pulled off the probe last summer after it emerged that some of their messages to each other included anti-Trump content. Strzok, an FBI counterintelligence agent, was reassigned to the Bureau’s human resources division after the discovery of the exchanges with Page, with whom he was having an affair.

According to a Saturday letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray from Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, the Justice Department provided 384 pages of messages to lawmakers on Friday. However, Johnson noted that additional texts sent between Dec. 14, 2016 and May 17 of last year were not preserved by the FBI’s system.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Rep. Jim Jordan is FED UP, Demands Second Special Counsel After FBI Loses Peter Strzok’s Text Messages

But the department also said in a letter to lawmakers that its record of messages sent to and from the agent, Peter Strzok, was incomplete because the FBI, for technical reasons, had been unable to preserve and retrieve about five months’ worth of communications. New text messages highlighted in a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Republican chairman of the Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, are from the spring and summer of 2016 and involve discussion of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. They reference Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s decision to accept the FBI’s conclusion in that case and a draft statement that former FBI Director James Comey had prepared in anticipation of closing out the Clinton investigation without criminal charges.

Following reports of the FBI’s mystery “glitch,” Rep. Jordan Jordan (R-OH) is renewing his call for a second special counsel to investigate the former Mueller team member.

“First the IRS destroyed emails pivotal to our investigation of their political targeting. Now the FBI “failed to preserve” texts between Peter Strzok & Lisa Page following the ’16 election. The time for a second special counsel is now,” tweeted the Ohio lawmaker.

This isn’t the first time Jordan has publicly suggested a second counsel be appointed.

Appearing before the House Judiciary Committee on December 13th, 2017, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was grilled by Jordan in relation to Strzok’s role in both the Hillary Clinton email investigation and Mueller-Russia probe.

“This is unbelievable,” Jordan lamented to Rosenstein, demanding to know what “fact pattern” would be required for a second special counsel to be appointed.

“I think the public trust in this whole thing is gone,” Jordan asserted.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

School Tells Cheerleaders No Bible Verses, So Cheerleaders Call In the Feds

Culture

School Tells Cheerleaders No Bible Verses, So Cheerleaders Call In the Feds

A group of cheerleaders froma Texas high school have won a court case to continue to display Bible verses on their banners.

According to First Liberty, the cheerleaders of Kountze High School in the southeast corner of the Lone Start State always had banners at their games, decorated with uplifting Bible messages.

One day in 2012, the superintendent received a complaint from the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation.

As a result, the school district ordered the cheer team to stop displaying Bible quotes.

So, the cheerleaders went to the Texas Supreme Court to fight for their First Amendment right to free speech.

TRENDING: Stunning: Every Dem. on Intel Committee Votes Against Letting Congress See FISA Memo

In January 2016, the Texas Supreme Court unanimously voted in favor of the cheerleaders.

But the battle didn’t end there.

According to the Dallas Morning News, in September 2017, the 9th Court of Appeals backed the Texas Supreme Court’s decision.

The normally liberal appeals court ruled the cheerleaders’ rights to display Bible quotes was “private speech” and thus should continue.

Should public schools allow religious banners?

According to PR Newswire, the decision was not only a victory for the cheerleaders, but served as an example to other school districts in the state.

In a news release, Hiram Sasser, general counsel to First Liberty, said: “We are pleased that once again religious liberty is vindicated and that cheerleaders across the state of Texas have the right to have religious messages on banners at high school football games.”

“No school district should be able to censor, ban, or claim ownership of the private religious speech of its students,” he continued.

We applaud these brave women for standing up for their religion and their rights as American citizens.

RELATED: Halftime Performers Nearly Get Booed Off the Field After Attempting to Trash Trump

The government can not and should not try to take those rights away.

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter if you think these cheerleaders are incredibly brave.

What do you think of this decision? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com