Former Chief Asst. U.S. Attorney: Trump Admin’s Espionage Act Enforcement May Spell Trouble For Hillary Clinton

Former Chief Asst. U.S. Attorney: Trump Admin’s Espionage Act Enforcement May Spell Trouble For Hillary Clinton

The Justice Department announced Tuesday that it had charged ex-CIA agent Jerry Chun Shing Lee with a felony for unlawfully retaining classified information. Chief Asst. U.S. Attorney Andrew C. McCarthy believes Lee’s arrest demonstrates the Trump administration is doing what the Obama administration, in part, refused to do — enforce the Espionage Act. The move may spell trouble for Hillary Clinton. 

McCarthy writes in National Review:

That said, the Trump Justice Department’s prosecution theory in Lee’s case repudiates in every salient particular the Obama Justice Department’s analysis of the Clinton investigation. […] It was based on such an absence of traitorous intent that the Obama Justice Department and the FBI — and, more important, President Obama himself — rationalized dropping the Clinton investigation rather than filing an indictment. […]

Finally, it makes no difference that Lee is charged with felony retention of classified information under the Espionage Act’s section 793(e) while Mrs. Clinton was said to be investigated for grossly negligent mishandling of classified information under the Act’s section 793(f). […]

Mrs. Clinton should have been investigated (and charged) under section 793(e) since she, like Lee, willfully and unlawfully retained classified information in unauthorized places (and transmitted it to unauthorized people). The gross-negligence felony (793(f)) should have been the prosecutors’ fallback position — i.e., even if a jury somehow rejected the overwhelming evidence that she willfully mishandled the intelligence, she could still be convicted if the jury concluded she was grossly negligent.

[…]

Yet, by drawing us into this morass, the Obama administration ingeniously set the framework for public discussion of Clinton’s case: just carelessness, not real crime. In reality, Clinton was like Lee: She should have been prosecuted for willful misconduct. […] To put it mildly, Lee’s case is no slam-dunk. But if the government fails to convict Lee, it won’t be due to the intent element, on which the evidence is strong. In that sense, the Espionage Act is back to being enforced as it is written. If the email investigation were reopened under those terms, it would be bad news for Mrs. Clinton and her underlings.

As The Gateway Pundit‘s Cristina Laila reported, Comey’s original Hillary Clinton statement was recently released to the public by Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI).

Comey’s original draft stated, “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statute proscribing gross negligence in the handling of classified information and of the statute proscribing misdemeanor mishandling, my judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

Later, the phrases “gross negligence” and “misdemeanor mishandling” where changed to “potential violations of the statutes.”

Shockingly, Johnson revealed “hostile actors” likely gained access to classified information inside Clinton’s private email server.

Documents released in August show Comey exonerated Clinton before the investigation into her email conduct had concluded. Even more concerning is “Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership,” reported Townhall.

Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow says Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton prior to interviewing 17 witnesses.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

James Woods Lights Up “Mangina Cory” Booker In Epic Tweetstorm After Latest Unhinged Fist-Pounding Mansplaining

James Woods Lights Up “Mangina Cory” Booker In Epic Tweetstorm After Latest Unhinged Fist-Pounding Tantrum

Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) became unhinged during Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday.

Booker glared crazily at Nielsen as he smashed his fists in protest of President Trump’s alleged “S***hole,” comments made during a meeting with Democrats on DACA.

James Woods took to his Twitter account Wednesday and pounded Cory Booker into the dirt.

This is why we love James Woods!

James Woods began his tweetstorm with, “If this guy had to play poker for a living, he’d starve to death…

Round two…”This reminds me. When does the new season of TheWalkingDead begin? #BatshitBooker”

Round three…”When #CoryBooker dreams of being someone else… #CryingCory #BatshitBooker”

Round 4…”#CoryBooker heard a bad word…”

Round 5…”Yep. No surprise. #CryingCory. #BatshitBooker”

James Woods then labeled Cory Booker “Mangina Cory”. Hah!

James Woods then celebrated good news of the economny by taking another shot at Mangina Cory “We keep winning while guys like #ManginaCory keep whining.”

Liberals, like children, have no control over their emotions and are unable to conduct themselves in a professional manner. Cory Booker represents the constituents who voted for him perfectly.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

What I Learned in the Peace Corps in Africa: Trump Is Right

Three weeks after college, I flew to Senegal, West Africa, to run a community center in a rural town.  Life was placid, with no danger, except to your health.  That danger was considerable, because it was, in the words of the Peace Corps doctor, “a fecalized environment.”


In plain English: s— is everywhere.  People defecate on the open ground, and the feces is blown with the dust – onto you, your clothes, your food, the water.  He warned us the first day of training: do not even touch water.  Human feces carries parasites that bore through your skin and cause organ failure.



Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that a few decades later, liberals would be pushing the lie that Western civilization is no better than a third-world country.  Or would teach two generations of our kids that loving your own culture and wanting to preserve it are racism.


Last time I was in Paris, I saw a beautiful African woman in a grand boubou have her child defecate on the sidewalk next to Notre Dame Cathedral.  The French police officer, ten steps from her, turned his head not to see.


I have seen.  I am not turning my head and pretending unpleasant things are not true.


Senegal was not a hellhole.  Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures’ terms.  But they are not our terms.  The excrement is the least of it.  Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible.


As a twenty-one-year-old starting out in the Peace Corps, I loved Senegal.  In fact, I was euphoric.  I quickly made friends and had an adopted family.  I relished the feeling of the brotherhood of man.  People were open, willing to share their lives and, after they knew you, their innermost thoughts.


The longer I lived there, the more I understood: it became blindingly obvious that the Senegalese are not the same as us.  The truths we hold to be self-evident are not evident to the Senegalese.  How could they be?  Their reality is totally different.  You can’t understand anything in Senegal using American terms.


Take something as basic as family.  Family was a few hundred people, extending out to second and third cousins.  All the men in one generation were called “father.”  Senegalese are Muslim, with up to four wives.  Girls had their clitorises cut off at puberty.  (I witnessed this, at what I thought was going to be a nice coming-of-age ceremony, like a bat mitzvah or confirmation.)  Sex, I was told, did not include kissing.  Love and friendship in marriage were Western ideas.  Fidelity was not a thing.  Married women would have sex for a few cents to have cash for the market.


What I did witness every day was that women were worked half to death.  Wives raised the food and fed their own children, did the heavy labor of walking miles to gather wood for the fire, drew water from the well or public faucet, pounded grain with heavy hand-held pestles, lived in their own huts, and had conjugal visits from their husbands on a rotating basis with their co-wives.  Their husbands lazed in the shade of the trees.


Yet family was crucial to people there in a way Americans cannot comprehend.


The Ten Commandments were not disobeyed – they were unknown.  The value system was the exact opposite.  You were supposed to steal everything you can to give to your own relatives.  There are some Westernized Africans who try to rebel against the system.  They fail.


We hear a lot about the kleptocratic elites of Africa.  The kleptocracy extends through the whole society.  My town had a medical clinic donated by international agencies.  The medicine was stolen by the medical workers and sold to the local store.  If you were sick and didn’t have money, drop dead.  That was normal.


So here in the States, when we discovered that my 98-year-old father’s Muslim health aide from Nigeria had stolen his clothes and wasn’t bathing him, I wasn’t surprised.  It was familiar.


In Senegal, corruption ruled, from top to bottom.  Go to the post office, and the clerk would name an outrageous price for a stamp.  After paying the bribe, you still didn’t know it if it would be mailed or thrown out.  That was normal.


One of my most vivid memories was from the clinic.  One day, as the wait grew hotter in the 110-degree heat, an old woman two feet from the medical aides – who were chatting in the shade of a mango tree instead of working – collapsed to the ground.  They turned their heads so as not to see her and kept talking.  She lay there in the dirt.  Callousness to the sick was normal.


Americans think it is a universal human instinct to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.  It’s not.  It seems natural to us because we live in a Bible-based Judeo-Christian culture.


We think the Protestant work ethic is universal.  It’s not.  My town was full of young men doing nothing.  They were waiting for a government job.  There was no private enterprise.  Private business was not illegal, just impossible, given the nightmare of a third-world bureaucratic kleptocracy.  It is also incompatible with Senegalese insistence on taking care of relatives.


All the little stores in Senegal were owned by Mauritanians.  If a Senegalese wanted to run a little store, he’d go to another country.  The reason?  Your friends and relatives would ask you for stuff for free, and you would have to say yes.  End of your business.  You are not allowed to be a selfish individual and say no to relatives.  The result: Everyone has nothing.


The more I worked there and visited government officials doing absolutely nothing, the more I realized that no one in Senegal had the idea that a job means work.  A job is something given to you by a relative.  It provides the place where you steal everything to give back to your family.


I couldn’t wait to get home.  So why would I want to bring Africa here?  Non-Westerners do not magically become American by arriving on our shores with a visa.


For the rest of my life, I enjoyed the greatest gift of the Peace Corps: I love and treasure America more than ever.  I take seriously my responsibility to defend our culture and our country and pass on the American heritage to the next generation.


African problems are made worse by our aid efforts.  Senegal is full of smart, capable people.  They will eventually solve their own country’s problems.  They will do it on their terms, not ours.  The solution is not to bring Africans here.


We are lectured by Democrats that we must privilege third-world immigration by the hundred million with chain migration.  They tell us we must end America as a white, Western, Judeo-Christian, capitalist nation – to prove we are not racist.  I don’t need to prove a thing.  Leftists want open borders because they resent whites, resent Western achievements, and hate America.  They want to destroy America as we know it.


As President Trump asked, why would we do that?


We have the right to choose what kind of country to live in.  I was happy to donate a year of my life as a young woman to help the poor Senegalese.  I am not willing to donate my country. 










Three weeks after college, I flew to Senegal, West Africa, to run a community center in a rural town.  Life was placid, with no danger, except to your health.  That danger was considerable, because it was, in the words of the Peace Corps doctor, “a fecalized environment.”


In plain English: s— is everywhere.  People defecate on the open ground, and the feces is blown with the dust – onto you, your clothes, your food, the water.  He warned us the first day of training: do not even touch water.  Human feces carries parasites that bore through your skin and cause organ failure.


Never in my wildest dreams would I have imagined that a few decades later, liberals would be pushing the lie that Western civilization is no better than a third-world country.  Or would teach two generations of our kids that loving your own culture and wanting to preserve it are racism.


Last time I was in Paris, I saw a beautiful African woman in a grand boubou have her child defecate on the sidewalk next to Notre Dame Cathedral.  The French police officer, ten steps from her, turned his head not to see.


I have seen.  I am not turning my head and pretending unpleasant things are not true.


Senegal was not a hellhole.  Very poor people can lead happy, meaningful lives in their own cultures’ terms.  But they are not our terms.  The excrement is the least of it.  Our basic ideas of human relations, right and wrong, are incompatible.


As a twenty-one-year-old starting out in the Peace Corps, I loved Senegal.  In fact, I was euphoric.  I quickly made friends and had an adopted family.  I relished the feeling of the brotherhood of man.  People were open, willing to share their lives and, after they knew you, their innermost thoughts.


The longer I lived there, the more I understood: it became blindingly obvious that the Senegalese are not the same as us.  The truths we hold to be self-evident are not evident to the Senegalese.  How could they be?  Their reality is totally different.  You can’t understand anything in Senegal using American terms.


Take something as basic as family.  Family was a few hundred people, extending out to second and third cousins.  All the men in one generation were called “father.”  Senegalese are Muslim, with up to four wives.  Girls had their clitorises cut off at puberty.  (I witnessed this, at what I thought was going to be a nice coming-of-age ceremony, like a bat mitzvah or confirmation.)  Sex, I was told, did not include kissing.  Love and friendship in marriage were Western ideas.  Fidelity was not a thing.  Married women would have sex for a few cents to have cash for the market.


What I did witness every day was that women were worked half to death.  Wives raised the food and fed their own children, did the heavy labor of walking miles to gather wood for the fire, drew water from the well or public faucet, pounded grain with heavy hand-held pestles, lived in their own huts, and had conjugal visits from their husbands on a rotating basis with their co-wives.  Their husbands lazed in the shade of the trees.


Yet family was crucial to people there in a way Americans cannot comprehend.


The Ten Commandments were not disobeyed – they were unknown.  The value system was the exact opposite.  You were supposed to steal everything you can to give to your own relatives.  There are some Westernized Africans who try to rebel against the system.  They fail.


We hear a lot about the kleptocratic elites of Africa.  The kleptocracy extends through the whole society.  My town had a medical clinic donated by international agencies.  The medicine was stolen by the medical workers and sold to the local store.  If you were sick and didn’t have money, drop dead.  That was normal.


So here in the States, when we discovered that my 98-year-old father’s Muslim health aide from Nigeria had stolen his clothes and wasn’t bathing him, I wasn’t surprised.  It was familiar.


In Senegal, corruption ruled, from top to bottom.  Go to the post office, and the clerk would name an outrageous price for a stamp.  After paying the bribe, you still didn’t know it if it would be mailed or thrown out.  That was normal.


One of my most vivid memories was from the clinic.  One day, as the wait grew hotter in the 110-degree heat, an old woman two feet from the medical aides – who were chatting in the shade of a mango tree instead of working – collapsed to the ground.  They turned their heads so as not to see her and kept talking.  She lay there in the dirt.  Callousness to the sick was normal.


Americans think it is a universal human instinct to do unto others as you would have them do unto you.  It’s not.  It seems natural to us because we live in a Bible-based Judeo-Christian culture.


We think the Protestant work ethic is universal.  It’s not.  My town was full of young men doing nothing.  They were waiting for a government job.  There was no private enterprise.  Private business was not illegal, just impossible, given the nightmare of a third-world bureaucratic kleptocracy.  It is also incompatible with Senegalese insistence on taking care of relatives.


All the little stores in Senegal were owned by Mauritanians.  If a Senegalese wanted to run a little store, he’d go to another country.  The reason?  Your friends and relatives would ask you for stuff for free, and you would have to say yes.  End of your business.  You are not allowed to be a selfish individual and say no to relatives.  The result: Everyone has nothing.


The more I worked there and visited government officials doing absolutely nothing, the more I realized that no one in Senegal had the idea that a job means work.  A job is something given to you by a relative.  It provides the place where you steal everything to give back to your family.


I couldn’t wait to get home.  So why would I want to bring Africa here?  Non-Westerners do not magically become American by arriving on our shores with a visa.


For the rest of my life, I enjoyed the greatest gift of the Peace Corps: I love and treasure America more than ever.  I take seriously my responsibility to defend our culture and our country and pass on the American heritage to the next generation.


African problems are made worse by our aid efforts.  Senegal is full of smart, capable people.  They will eventually solve their own country’s problems.  They will do it on their terms, not ours.  The solution is not to bring Africans here.


We are lectured by Democrats that we must privilege third-world immigration by the hundred million with chain migration.  They tell us we must end America as a white, Western, Judeo-Christian, capitalist nation – to prove we are not racist.  I don’t need to prove a thing.  Leftists want open borders because they resent whites, resent Western achievements, and hate America.  They want to destroy America as we know it.


As President Trump asked, why would we do that?


We have the right to choose what kind of country to live in.  I was happy to donate a year of my life as a young woman to help the poor Senegalese.  I am not willing to donate my country. 





via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/TYiPDP

Brzezinski Disturbed Trump Declared Cognitively Healthy: ‘The Word Evil Comes to Mind’

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski expressed concern Wednesday over Donald Trump getting a clean cognitive bill of health, saying "the word evil comes to mind" to explain the president’s behavior.

White House doctor Rear Adm. Ronny Jackson addressed the media on Tuesday about Trump’s health, which he declared to be "excellent," and he also said he aced a cognitive test given at the president’s request.

In the wake of the controversy over Trump’s reported slur on African countries as "s—hole" nations, Brzezinski said she was worried.

"If he wasn’t healthy, that would be a great excuse for this behavior. Now he has none, which you can then deduce other things that are far more nefarious and frightening," Brzezinski said.

Former Obama administration official Steve Rattner said he had a similar thought in that he wasn’t sure if it would be better if Trump had mental issues.

"I’m disturbed that they say he’s cognitively healthy," Brzezinski said. "I think the word evil comes to mind."

The post Brzezinski Disturbed Trump Declared Cognitively Healthy: ‘The Word Evil Comes to Mind’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Liberals Furious NHL Picked Trump-Supporter Kid Rock to Perform at All-Star Game

Liberals Furious NHL Picked Trump-Supporter Kid Rock to Perform at All-Star Game



Liberals are furious at the National Hockey League after the announcement that politically conservative singer Kid Rock was hired to perform at the upcoming All-Star Game on February 18.

Sports writer Andrew Bucholtz joined with and gave a platform to the liberal outrage in his report at The Comeback on January 17.

Bucholtz, for instance, continually called Kid Rock by his given name in his report on the gig instead of calling him by his better-known stage name. It is unlikely that the writer would do the same for liberal entertainers such as Lady Ga Ga or Madonna.

The writer also seemed annoyed that hockey great Jeremy Roenick noted his delight that Kid Rock was hired to entertain fans at the All-Star Game.

In the press conference announcing the choice, Roenick said that they “can’t get a better guy” than Kid Rock for the game.

“When I talk to people about you,” Roenick said to the singer, “I say, Kid Rock is the most talented musician, I think ever, on the planet, because you can put any instrument in your hand or on your mouth and you can play anything and rock a house and sing any kind of genre.”

Kid Rock replied by joking, “Jack of all trades, master of none.”

But, as Bucholtz revealed, a list of folks on Twitter were incensed that Rock was chosen to perform at the game; because the Detroit-based singer is a well-known supporter of President Donald Trump and a Republican booster. Kid Rock even briefly contemplated running for the U.S. Senate from Michigan.

But, liberal members of the media attacked the NHL on Twitter calling Kid Rock a “racist” and slamming the league for “going political” with the choice:

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Donald Trump Dumps on ‘Dicky Durbin’ for Blowing Up DACA Deal

Donald Trump Dumps on ‘Dicky Durbin’ for Blowing Up DACA Deal



President Donald Trump blamed Democratic Senate Minority Whip Sen. Dick Durbin for ruining any chance of a DACA deal, according to details of a private conversation with the president leaked to the press.

“Senator Dicky Durbin totally misrepresented what was said at the DACA meeting,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “Deals can’t get made when there is no trust! Durbin blew DACA and is hurting our Military.”

Trump commented on the issue after spending time at his golf course in Palm Beach, Florida and returning to his club at Mar-a-Lago, where he is staying over the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend.

Since news of his comment referring to “shithole countries” broke on Thursday, Trump said defensively that it was “not the language used,” although he admitted that it was “tough.”

But Durbin repeatedly accused the president of making racist comments.

“He said these hate-filled things and he said them repeatedly,” Durbin said at a press conference on Friday.

Trump spent most of the weekend blaming Democrats for failing to deliver a workable deal on DACA.

“Honestly, I don’t think the Democrats want to make a deal,” Trump said to reporters on Sunday. “I think they talk about DACA, but they don’t want to help the DACA people.”

Trump met with House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy over dinner at his club to discuss the possibility of a deal, as well as a potential Democrat-led shutdown of the federal government over the issue.

“I don’t know if there is going to be a shutdown,” Trump said, before the dinner. “There shouldn’t be, because if there is our military gets hurt very badly. We cannot let our military be hurt.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

The entire “flat Earth conspiracy” is a hoax and the media is loving it

What explains all of these flat Earth believer stories which keep popping up in the media? Bear with me here, because this may be a bit on the “meta” side as the kids like to say these days. I’m not talking about the phenomenon itself, where people supposedly claim that the planet is shaped like a pancake and the government, no doubt in league with Big Globe, is trying to bury the truth for some nefarious reason. The question I was pondering this week is why the media keeps paying so much attention to it. And I’ve got a theory of my own.

First of all, yes… I’ve fallen victim to the trend myself. Almost a year ago I tried digging into some of the high profile athletes and musicians who seemed to have become devout followers of this cult. And not too long ago I even dedicated a small amount of space here to the Flat Earther who was building his own rocket to prove the planet isn’t round. So I’m part of the problem too, I suppose, but I was honestly only doing it for comedic effect on a slow news day.

Not so with some of our major newspapers and cable news outlets, however. They take these people seriously and seek to weave some larger narrative about the impending end to the age of reason. There’s another one of them in the LA Times today, describing the various wackadoos who gather in meet-ups to discuss the shape of the world. If they were only looking at the loons in question, that would be one thing, but we’re seeing a repeated pattern in their theories as to why this is happening. Here’s a sample. (Emphasis added)

A conspiratorial mind-set and a deep current of religious ideology permeate the movement, which preaches that Earth was created by design, not by accident. As evidence of its shape, some reference Bible verses touting “the four corners of the Earth,” “foundations of the Earth” and Earth being God’s “footstool.”

Many of the most popular flat Earth videos come out of Colorado, host of next year’s Flat Earth International Conference along with the Colorado International Flat Earth Film Festival…

David Falk, assistant professor of astronomy at Los Angeles Valley College, thinks that’s a mistake.

“The serious science community feels it’s so basic that they don’t want to waste their time debunking it,” he said. “But this is a scary thing…. The danger isn’t that people don’t believe the Earth is round, it’s the lack of scientific literacy.

It’s slowly started to dawn on me that this is a favorite subject for many in the mainstream media because it allows them to characterize people who supposedly believe in such things as religious zealots who are suspicious of science. That’s a great backdrop for complaints about people who question global warming or nearly anything else which can be tied to ostensibly conservative movements. (Of course, don’t ask them about the science behind transgender issues.)

So here’s the conclusion I’ve come to. The LA Times cites all the usual figures about how many people are participating in this conspiracy theory, specifically the number of views that YouTube videos accumulate or the number of people googling the question. But does that mean that there are literally millions of people who have bought into this hoax?

I say absolutely not. Any of the “conferences” they reference are almost always sparsely attended by true believers, even if they’re advertised nationally. Many of them probably register more attendees from the media there to cover the event (plus the curious who are likely there to mock them). Same thing with the online videos and articles. Sure, they get a lot of views. But I’m willing to bet that the vast majority of them are people like me who are either investigating the people involved in the conspiracy or just sharing the videos with friends as a joke. Also, there are obviously some people profiting from this conspiracy theory by hosting events, selling books, writing for television shows and who knows what else. If there’s a profit to be made, somebody will be along presently to fill the vacuum.

In reality, the actual number of people who honestly believe this stuff has to be vanishingly small. Do you personally know anyone capable of firing up a laptop who is actually that stupid? The effort it would take for the governments of all the advanced nations of the world to pull off that sort of a coverup is beyond our ability to calculate. The high profile people you see talking about it, such as a couple of basketball players and rappers, are frequently seen laughing when they talk about it. It’s a joke to them, and they probably derive some amusement from seeing the media flip out and talk about them.

So why keep covering it? As I said, it feeds into a larger narrative, where religious people are backward, reject science and all the rest. And meanwhile, most of the people engaging in the actual conspiracy theory are pulling off a conspiracy of their own. They’ve found something that will draw attention to themselves and are faking it for their own purposes. And certain segments of the press are eating it up.

The post The entire “flat Earth conspiracy” is a hoax and the media is loving it appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Liberals TRIGGERED Over Martin Luther King Day Gun Sale

On a day that has been set aside to honor the memory of slain civil rights icon Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. it is a disgrace that so many on the left have chosen to make it all about divisive racial politics.

Instead of commemorating King’s inspiration to millions, the usual suspects are spending the say soiling their bloomers over the silliest things but that is how the left has weaponized race in the post-Obama era.

What has triggered our precious little snowflakes now?

How about an Albuquerque, New Mexico gun store that is having an MLK Day sale?

That’s correct. There is much caterwauling over a private enterprise’s holiday promotion offering a discount to shoppers on a federal holiday when there are people off of work and with more money in their pockets thanks to President Trump’s tax reform.

Albuquerque’s KRQE-13 reports on this silliness:

Some are calling it disturbing and ironic. A New Mexico gun shop owner is defending his Martin Luther King Jr. Day advertisement that’s circulating in a local newspaper. He even said the ad aligns with the mission of Dr. King.

Plastered alongside women’s basketball scores in the sports section of Sunday’s Albuquerque Journal, Los Ranchos Gun Shop is promoting 10 percent off all accessories with the purchase of a gun for MLK Day.

“Certainly, Martin Luther King Day for the past three years has been a tremendous sales day for us. People have the day off,” said gun shop owner Mark Abramson.

Mention the ad, and it’s an additional 5 percent off. However, many say they’re bothered by the sales tactic.

“There’s irony and I haven’t seen any other businesses have a sale for Martin Luther King and it’s so ironic that it’s a gun shop,” said Hanz Herdia.

That irony, as some have pointed out on social media, is because of what Dr. King stood for: non-violence and peaceful protest. Not to mention, the civil rights leader was assassinated with a gun in Memphis, Tennessee in 1968.

“I do think it’s in bad taste and I’m sure other people have used historical figures to sell things but it also helps to reflect their morals and it doesn’t in this case,” said Allen Marquez.

Abramson said he didn’t mean to offend anyone.

The owner than goes on to add:

“I thought it was an appropriate depiction of Dr. King. We celebrate some of the freedoms we have because of the work he did,” Abramson said.

He believes the ad is consistent with Dr. King’s mission of equality.

“Jim Crow laws and things that happened immediately after the civil war and continued for almost 100 years denied blacks, denied minorities the right to defend themselves while the majority could do that. Dr. King fought against that,” Abramson said.

Hot-headed liberal ignoramuses would probably be shocked to learn that King himself was a gun owner. He would have had to be an idiot to not be considering how many people wanted him dead.

This inconvenient fact is pointed out by the good folks over at Bearing Arms:

Well, one gun store decided to have a Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday sale and ran an ad. Some are less than pleased with the idea.

Except, well, it seems that Dr. King was a gun owner.

That’s right. You see, while Dr. King advocated for nonviolence when it came to protesting segregation, he wasn’t an idiot. He understood there would be people who would want to see him dead, and he prepared for that.

The article cites UCLA law professor Adam Winkler from his book Gunfight:

Most people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the 1956, as the civil rights movement heated up, King turned to firearms for self-protection and he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

Again, it is utterly asinine to believe the Dr. King didn’t own guns but try explaining that to a liberal. Good luck.

Bearing Arms then slams the coffin on the liberal argument and pounds in the nails:

That’s really the origin of gun control. The purpose of early gun control laws was to disarm blacks. This is especially true in the Deep South immediately following the Civil War, but was also true throughout the nation. While laws were written in such a way that they weren’t focused on ethnicity, that was only to sneak them by the carpetbaggers and others who would have shut down any attempt at simply disarming blacks.

Instead, they simply wrote laws that would, theoretically, apply to everyone, all while knowing that no white sheriff would arrest a white man for these “crimes.”

Eventually, they were applied to everyone, but in a world where statues are yanked down because of racism and anything with supposedly racist ties is denigrated, why is gun control still viable? If anything hurt blacks in rural communities, it was laws that inhibited their ability to defend themselves from racists.

Connecting Dr. King to a gun store sale? Makes perfect sense to me.

There you have it liberals and race-baiters. It is silly to throw a temper tantrum on a day like this when Dr. King himself was an advocate of gun ownership as well as the history of how blacks were disarmed in the Jim Crow era.

Today’s MLK Day Special Bonus Question: Which was the party that was the biggest backers of slavery, the Ku Klux Klan, and Jim Crow laws?

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

WOW! Mueller, McCabe & Rosenstein Involved in Cover-Up of FBI Probe Into Uranium-One Bribes

WOW! Mueller, McCabe & Rosenstein Involved in Cover-Up of FBI Probe Into Uranium-One Bribes

As reported by The Gateway Pundit‘s Jim Hoft on Friday, Justice Department officials in the District of Maryland announced Mark Lambert of Mount Airy, Maryland was indicted on 11 counts related to “bribery, kickbacks and money laundering.” The charges stem from an alleged scheme to bribe Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official at JSC Techsnabexport (TENEX).

Zerohedge reports:

According to the indictment, Lambert and others at Transport Logistics International (TLI) engaged in several counts of bribery, kickbacks and money laundering with Russian nuclear official Vadim Mikerin, in order to secure business advantages with TENEX – a subsidiary of Rosatom, the Kremlin’s state-owned energy company which bought Uranium One.

TLI would have ostensibly transported all of the uranium from the U1 deal, were it not for an FBI undercover mole buried deep within the Russian nuclear industry who gathered extensive evidence of corruption. […]

Robert Mueller’s FBI had been investigating the scheme since at least 2008 – with retiring Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe assigned to the ongoing investigation which was hidden from the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS). Had they known, the committee never would have approved the Uranium One deal with TENEX’s parent company, Rosatom. 

Four individuals were eventually prosecuted and given plea agreements after the Uranium One deal was approved. The prosecuting DOJ attorneys? Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and top Mueller investigator in the Trump-Russia probe, Andrew Weissman – who praised former acting Attorney General Sally Yates for defying Trump.

The Hill‘s John Solomon reported that the Obama Justice Department failed to call on the deal’s secret informant, William D. Campbell, when it came time to charging former Russian uranium industry executive Vadim Mikerinn.

“While he was Maryland’s chief federal prosecutor, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s office failed to interview the undercover informant in the FBI’s Russian nuclear bribery case before it filed criminal charges in the case in 2014, officials told The Hill,” reports Solomon.

“I’ve never heard of such a case unless the victim is dead. I’ve never heard of prosecutors making a major case and not talking to the victim before you made it, especially when he was available to them through the FBI,” Alan Dershowitz told The Hill.

During an October hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Jeff Sessions told chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) that the Department of Justice may investigate Hillary Clinton’s role in the Uranium-One deal.

Is Sessions finally following through on his promise or is this more hogwash from the Attorney General?

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Satirical Site Ripping Feminists SHUTS DOWN After Being Out-Crazied By Real Feminists

“Feminism in 2018,” Watson captioned the post.

Initially stumbling upon Watson’s post, I assumed it was real. I’ve covered enough bats*** crazy feminists’ theories and unintelligible blog posts that such an asinine concept seemed more than fitting to have come from a sincere feminist fresh off her gender studies degree.

While I was eagerly searching for the actual article, it became apparent that the post was a fake, perfectly satirizing the insanity of third-wave feminism. And then things became even more hilarious: the satirical site was actually shut down by the prankster who created it because — brace yourself — the writers were out-crazied by real feminists. Medusa Magazine was pumping out satirical takes, only to be one-upped by the real feminists — including ones who write for The Washington Post.

The Medusa Magazine creator announced the shutdown of the site in November. He has stayed somewhat anonymous, but revealed that he is also the owner of AgeOfShitLords.com. (Seriously.)

“[W]e are shutting down our rather hilarious project because we can no longer compete with our competition,” said the creator in a post hilariously titled, “I created ‘Medusa Magazine’ and I am shutting it down because Feminist stupidity has surpassed satire.”

“Myself and the fellow Shitposters who operated and published articles on this website while it lasted pride ourselves on writing fairly believable satire with just enough retardation to keep our readers in constant doubt. This has been fun, but all good things have to come to an end. I am shutting down this website because recent events have proven to us that it is no longer possible to satirize the Feminist left,” he wrote.

The creator hyperlinked to a Facebook post (which is currently unavailable) he allegedly published in May showing his premeditationregarding the site. “One of these days, I’m going to start a Feminist website. I’ll get a couple of Shitlords together, and we’ll write tons of satirical articles, but from a Feminist perspective, to make the site look more believable. It will be the ultimate Social Experiment.”

“Since starting the blog, our articles have been featured on several media publications like Info-wars, The Federalist, The Gateway Pundit, and several other websites that fell for our prank, including one Russian website that covered our article calling for ‘White abortions’, as proof of how politically correct the west has become,” he bragged.

He says he was eventually discovered because he used the same fake name to “buy medusamagazine.com that I had used to buy ageofshitlords.com a year ago.” Classic.

“[W]e are shutting down our rather hilarious project because we can no longer compete with our competition,” he continued. “We have come to realize that our competition is not other satirical websites, but rather the people we are trying to satirize.”

The site noticed they had been officially out-crazied when they ran an insane piece called “Why we should believe women who accuse right wingers of rape more than those who accuse liberals.” Just two days later, “an actual Feminist and self-proclaimed expert on ‘rape culture’ wrote an article for The Washington Post no less, using the same rational and reasoning as our satirical article that was written just a few days before,” he said.

The WaPo piece was amazingly titled, “I am a feminist. I study rape culture. And I don’t want Al Franken to resign.”

And there was more consensus on the issue from the Left:

“Its [sic] like they read our hoax article, agreed with it and then decided to incorporate it into their movement,” noted the creator.

“And that is why we are shutting down this website,” he stated. “Because there is no point in operating a caricature website of Feminism anymore when real life Feminists are now more insane than any caricature we could ever dream up.”

We are literally past the point of parody when it comes to feminists.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2wzeEU9