REPORTER: DNC and Hillary Camp Had Contractual Control Over How FBI-DOJ Used Bogus Dossier to Spy on Trump

REPORTER: DNC and Hillary Camp Had Contractual Control Over How FBI-DOJ Used Bogus Dossier to Spy on Trump

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) confirmed Wednesday from the Senate floor the Russia dossier was “unverified in 2016” when Obama’s FBI/DOJ used it to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump and his private associates.

Wednesday’s development about the Hillary-funded Russia dossier reveals a new level of corruption in the top FBI brass.

Paul Sperry, reporter for the New York Post spells out how Hillary Clinton coordinated the FBI hit on Donald Trump and his private associates.

This is HUGE.

Sperry tweeted, “DNC & Hillary Clinton campaign had contractual control over how the product they paid for was used & disseminated. That means Simpson & Steele had to first consult with Clinton campaign lawyers before taking the dossier to the FBI & to the media. Ergo, Hillary coordinated FBI hit”

In October of 2017 the Washington Post reported Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid for the Fusion GPS dossier alleging Russian ties with the presidential campaign of Republican Donald Trump and sordid phony personal smears of Trump.

At the end of October, Hillary Clinton claimed she didn’t know about the Russia dossier (that her campaign actually paid for) until after Buzzfeed published the 35-page document in January of 2017.

Of course Hillary Clinton knew about the dossier. The salacious document was a failed ‘October surprise’.

It sure looks like she was the one who ordered the FBI to obtain a spy warrant; Donald Trump was her opponent after all. Hillary had every motive to spy on Trump’s campaign.

Paul Sperry is the former D.C. bureau chief for Investor’s Business Daily, Hoover Institution media fellow, author of several books, including bestseller INFILTRATION

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Motel 6 helped ICE catch illegal immigrants — and is getting sued for it. Here’s why

For the second time this month, Motel 6 is being sued for cooperating with federal immigration authorities, according to The Hill.

What happened?

A lawsuit by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund alleges that Motel 6 employees in Arizona gave guest lists to Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents.

Eight Latino plaintiffs were detained as a result of Motel 6 turning over the guest lists, and at least one of them was deported. The lawsuit was filed on their behalf.

The lawsuit claims that Motel 6 violated laws that prevent discrimination on the basis of nationality and unreasonable search and seizure.

What was the other lawsuit about?

Earlier in January, Motel 6 was sued by Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson after personal information, including license numbers, date of birth, and room numbers, on more than 9,000 guests was turned over to ICE by six Motel 6 locations.

What does Motel 6 say about this?

After the Washington lawsuit was filed, a spokeswoman came out against the unnecessary provision of guest information to ICE.

“In September, Motel 6 issued a directive to every one of our more than 1,400 locations, making it clear that they are prohibited from voluntarily providing daily guests lists to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Motel 6 takes this matter very seriously, and we have and will continue to fully cooperate with the Office of the State Attorney General,” the email statement read.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

IT’S A TRAP=> POTUS Trump Says He Would “Love To” Interview With Mueller Under Oath

IT’S A TRAP=> POTUS Trump Says He Would “Love To” Interview With Mueller Under Oath

Dirty cop Mueller is gunning for President Trump.

The Special Counsel is looking to interview the President about a variety of things including ‘Russian collusion’ and his firing of James Comey.

Since ‘collusion’ isn’t a crime, Mueller is looking to catch Trump making a false statement under oath and he will use every trick in the book to accomplish just that.

It’s a trap. President Trump should avoid a sit-down interview with Mueller.

Associated Press reports:

 President Donald Trump declared late Wednesday he’s “looking forward” to being questioned — under oath — in the special counsel’s probe of Russian election interference and possible Trump obstruction in the firing of the FBI director.

Trump said he would be willing to answer questions under oath in the interview, which special counsel Robert Mueller has been seeking but which White House officials had not previously confirmed the president would grant.

“I’m looking forward to it, actually,” Trump said when asked by reporters at the White House. As for timing, he said, “I guess they’re talking about two or three weeks, but I’d love to do it.”

He said, as he has repeatedly, that “there’s no collusion whatsoever” with the Russians, and he added, “There’s no obstruction whatsoever.”

Judge Napolitano recently warned Trump against an interview with Mueller on Fox News:

He [Judge Nap] explained that Mueller would present Trump’s interview to the grand jury and have them compare it with other evidence that has already been uncovered in the probe.

“Never, never, never — I can’t say never enough — let your client sit down with the prosecutors who are trying to develop a case against him,” Napolitano said. “Never expect them to be fair, never expect them to tell everything that they know. You will never know, and your client — the president — will never know everything that they know about him. It’s a recipe for disaster.”

The entire Russia investigation is based on a phony Hillary-funded Russia dossier. Top FBI brass knew the document was unverified yet they still used it to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump’s camp. Mueller knows this yet continues to march forward in his witch hunt.

The Russia hoax should be shut down before Mueller has a chance to interview President Trump.

 

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Judge Who Presided Over Mistrial Acquits Sen. Robert Menendez on 7 of 18 Counts of Public Corruption

Judge Who Presided Over Mistrial Acquits Sen. Robert Menendez on 7 of 18 Counts of Public Corruption



The federal district judge who presided over the public corruption case against Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) that ended in a mistrial in November, acquitted Menendez and his co-defendant, Dr. Salomon Melgen, on 7 of 18 public corruption counts in a decision released on Wednesday.

Last week, the Department of Justice announced its intent to re-try the case against both Menendez and Melgen, who was convicted on 67 felony counts of Medicare fraud in April.

“In an opinion filed on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge William Walls denied defense requests for a judgment of acquittal on all charges, based on the evidence presented in the first trial against Menendez and his co-defendant, Salomon Melgen,” NJ.com reported.

NJ.com continued:

But quoting Gertrude Stein, the judge declared “there is no there there,” in tossing seven major charges against the two men involving political contributions involving hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions by Melgen to several political committees with ties to the senator.

Politico reported on another point made by Judge Walls in his surprising opinion:

“A rational juror could not find that Menendez and Melgen were aware of the terms of the alleged quid quo,” Walls wrote in his opinion.

Walls left in place charges that Melgen allegedly provided Menendez with private jet flights and lavish vacations in exchange for political favors. Walls also left in place what is widely regarded as the toughest charge for Menendez to beat: That he purposefully filed false financial disclosure statements that left off Melgen’s gifts.

The acquittal on the seven counts could substantially shorten Menendez and Melgen’s retrial. The last trial ran two and a half months. At the end, juror Ed Norris said 10 of the 12 jurors wanted to acquit the senator.

Legal analysts called the decision a win for Menendez and his co-defendant, but not the end of the federal government’s case against the two men.

“The decision was not insignificant, according to Joseph Hayden of Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, a prominent New Jersey defense attorney,” NJ.com reported:

“It’s a third of the indictment,” he said. “It’s not a knockout, but it’s a big gain for the defense.”

Hayden said the dismissal of the counts “removes an area where the jury can compromise in the jury room.”

Robert Mintz, a criminal defense attorney at McCarter & English and a former federal prosecutor, also said the judgment of acquittal on several bribery counts hands a victory to the defense, but left much of the case intact.

Judge Walls “also announced he will not preside over the retrial,” Politico reported.

Attorneys for the two defendants responded quickly to the judge’s decision.

Bloomberg.com reported:

Kirk Ogrosky, an attorney for Melgen, said, “The court’s acquittal on all counts which involve monetary contributions is long overdue. There was simply never any quid-pro-quo agreement between my client and Senator Menendez, and the court has now acquitted these two longtime Hispanic-American friends on all counts that involved political contributions. Hopefully, this Department of Justice will read the court’s decision and drop the remainder of the case.”

“In a statement, Menendez attorney Abbe D. Lowell said the court’s decision to throw out parts of the case questions about why the government is seeking a retrial,” NJ.com reported:

“With the court’s decision, this case is now solely about the purest of personal hospitality allegations–stays [at] his friend, Dr. Melgen’s family home and reimbursed trips on a plane that Dr. Melgen was flying anyway,” said Lowell. “A jury rejected the government’s facts and theory of bribery, and now the trial judge has rejected a critical legal theory on which the case was brought. The decision of the Department of Justice to retry the case makes even less sense than it did last week and we hope it would be reconsidered.”

The Department of Justice responded cautiously.

“The Justice Department is reviewing the judge’s order and considering its next steps, a spokeswoman, Nicole Navas Oxman, said,” Bloomberg.com reported.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Regulations Slowing Wall Construction Are Getting the Trump Treatment

What is a higher priority: the security of the United States, or “noise pollution” that might upset a few birds?

That’s the question the federal government is now facing, but the left seems to have sided with the birds.

A handful of obscure environmental regulations are being used by liberal groups to delay the planned wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, and the Trump administration is trying to put a stop to the nonsense.

“The Secretary of Homeland Security has determined, pursuant to law, that it is necessary to waive certain laws, regulations and other legal requirements in order to ensure the expeditious construction of barriers and roads in the vicinity of the international land border of the United States,” the government stated on Monday.

According to the Washington Examiner, a laundry list of environmental rules are all getting in the way of proposed wall construction in New Mexico, not far from El Paso, Texas.

TRENDING: Interactive Nuke Map: Would You Survive a Direct Hit to Your City?

These include: The National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, the Clean Air Act, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Noise Control Act.

Don’t worry, there won’t be a quiz. Suffice it to say that if an obscure regulation exists, liberal groups are trying to use it in a lawsuit to block the wall.

“The Center for Biological Diversity, the first group to sue the Trump administration over the wall last year, said Monday that it is considering a new lawsuit to address this latest waiver,” reported the Examiner.

“The group argued that the wall violates the endangered species law by cutting off species’ migratory patterns and ignoring protected habitat,” continued that outlet.

Do you support the construction of a border wall?

But the Trump administration is pushing back, and is citing national security as justification for waivers to the myriad of environmental red tape.

“The United States Border Patrol’s El Paso Sector is an area of high illegal entry,” a notice from the Department of Homeland Security made clear. “The El Paso Sector therefore remains an area of high illegal entry for which there is an immediate need to construct border barriers and roads.”

Predictably, groups like the Center for Biological Diversity are dramatically downplaying the negative impacts of illegal immigration and smuggling, while wringing their hands over largely desert land.

“Beyond jeopardizing wildlife, endangered species and public lands, the U.S.-Mexico border wall is part of a larger strategy of ongoing border militarization that damages human rights, civil liberties, native lands, local businesses and international relations,” that group complained.

RELATED: Supreme Court Scores Trump DACA Win

Apparently the human rights of people brutalized by cross-border crime are not very important, but making sure that aliens and human smugglers can enter the United States unimpeded is completely fine.

There’s a place for general environmental regulations, but using them to disrupt border enforcement and endanger national security is ludicrous. The government’s job is to serve the people, not endanger human lives to protect a stray pronghorn antelope.

The reality is that President Trump is doing exactly what he promised when he was elected: taking border security seriously. That’s why he won, but his opponents now seem shocked that he’s actually doing what he pledged all along.

Press “Share on Facebook” if you’ve had enough of the left trying to block border enforcement!

What do you think about these anti-wall lawsuits? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Report: Illegal Alien Blames ‘Black Magic’ After Giving Herpes to a Child

Report: Illegal Alien Blames ‘Black Magic’ After Giving Herpes to a Child



An illegal alien in Indiana accused of molesting a child and giving her the herpes virus has blamed “black magic” for his actions, a report says.

Huber Morales, 24, was charged with five felony sex crimes by authorities in Vanderburgh County, Indiana, on January 16 after doctors alleged that he molested a seven-year-old girl and gave her herpes, according to NBC Channel 14 News.

Morales, who told police he was born in Mexico and is in the U.S. illegally, was booked into the Vanderburgh County jail on five counts of molesting a child, including two level-one felony counts and three level-four felony counts.

The molestation was reported after the child was taken to a hospital for an outbreak of genital herpes early this month. When asked how she might have contracted the disease, the child claimed that Morales had molested her “a lot of times.”

For his part, Morales allegedly told police it wasn’t his fault and insisted that someone was using “black magic” to force him to molest the girl.

The suspect’s bond was set at $100,000. He was also ordered not to have any contact with the victim, the Courier and Press reported.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Why Social Media Companies Should Embrace Blockchain

Blockchain makes it possible to securely store and transfer digital information without the need for centralized servers. Its first application was in cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, which enabled the exchange of money without the need for brokers and gatekeepers such as PayPal and banks. But blockchain isn’t limited to monetary transactions, and many companies are employing it to create all kinds of decentralized applications in various domains.

OpinionsFacebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg mentioned “cryptocurrency” and “decentralization” in his New Year’s Resolution post, but without giving away details. To me, it seemed like a ploy to take advantage of the current hype (and money-making opportunities) surrounding blockchain. Similarly, messaging startup Telegram’s well-documented plan to transition to blockchain looks more like a scheme to get its founders richer than they already are.

In the past year, many blockchain startups made fortunes by launching Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), in which companies sell their proprietary crypto-tokens to raise funds for their projects. But many of these companies failed to deliver anything of value. According to a Deloitte report, of the 27,000 projects launched on the open-source code-sharing platform Github in 2016 alone, only 8 percent have survived.

In all fairness, blockchain is a very interesting technology, and it can surely solve many of the issues with which social media platforms are struggling. But are those the problems that social media companies want to fix?

Transforming Social Media With Blockchain

To understand how blockchain can transform social media, consider how a centralized service like Facebook works. Under its current architecture, Facebook is the sole proprietor of all its users’ data, including profile data, connections, posts, interactions, preferences, chat logs, device information, and geolocations.

The sheer amount of information Facebook has about its users enables it to run a very profitable ad service—its main source of income. Facebook is also in exclusive control of the software that runs on its platform.

Facebook users, on the other hand, have practically no ownership of their data or control over the content they consume. They get none of the money that’s made from their data. If Facebook closes their account, they can’t retrieve their data. If they decide to register with another service, they can’t port over their Facebook data, unless Facebook allows it. The situation is more or less the same with other centralized platforms.

Why Blockchains Fork: A Tale of Two Cryptocurrencies

This imbalance of power could become dangerous by enabling social media companies to influence users by manipulating the content of their feeds without obtaining their consent or even letting them know.

Instead of centralized servers, blockchain-based social media networks store users’ data on decentralized storage networks and encrypt it so that only users can access it. A few blockchain startups such as ONG and Nexus have deployed decentralized social media networks that put users in full control of their digital profiles, giving them the power to decide when and with whom to share it.

In this model, advertisers pay users (and not the company that owns the platform) in cryptocurrency to gain access to their data and display relevant ads to them. Users’ ownership of data would also let them port their information and digital profiles to other applications and networks, without seeking permission from anyone. This gives users more choice and prevents social media companies from locking users into their platforms.

Another plus for users: Blockchain applications run on smart contracts, which are transparent, meaning you can examine their functionality. Social media companies wouldn’t be able to secretly change how the application works without getting approval from the communities that support them.

Social media companies could also benefit from transitioning to the blockchain, though. For one thing, they could cut the huge cost of maintaining platforms. Some blockchain applications function on shared economies, where users can share their storage and compute resources with the network in exchange for cryptocurrency rewards. This could be a boon to companies such as Snapchat, which pay hundreds of millions of dollars in cloud server costs every year.

Companies could also relieve themselves of the responsibilities that come with handling user data, especially considering looming regulations such as Europe’s General Data Regulation Protection (GDPR) and constant requests from governments to shut down the accounts of dissidents or to hand over user data for surveillance and espionage purposes.

Social Media Giants and Blockchain

Despite the clear benefits of decentralizing social media networks, I don’t think Facebook would be willing to give up the immensely profitable empire it has built on user data to give power back to users. But just the idea of endorsing cryptocurrencies and blockchain might make Facebook even richer than it already is. Large brands and established companies have reaped huge benefits simply by using blockchain terminology.

One example: In December 2017, an iced tea company managed to triple the price of its shares after it changed its name from “Long Island Iced Tea Corporation” to “Long Blockchain Corporation.” And Kodak, which has been struggling since the advent of digital photography, doubled its stock price after announcing a plan to launch its own cryptocurrency, called “KodakCoin.”

To be fair, Zuckerberg hinted only at cryptocurrencies and not at a full-blown blockchain platform for Facebook. But a “FacebookCoin” used only to pay for services in Facebook would be a minimal improvement—not the radical “decentralization” vision Zuckerberg also referred to.

Telegram, the other social media company that has been touting its upcoming blockchain upgrade, relies on a considerably different business model. The company doesn’t display ads or sell users’ data to other companies, so it has a lower barrier to entry when it comes to blockchain. The company will hold an ICO in late January for its decentralized platform, which it calls the Telegram Open Network (TON), and will launch its product in multiple phases.

Telegram’s plan and white paper has everything you’d expect from a blockchain application. But I’m perplexed at why it aims to raise $1.2 billion to develop a service that won’t pay for cloud servers. Moreover, it will be distributing half its tokens in a subsidized presale to large investors. This will effectively give those investors—undoubtedly including its own super-rich founders—too much sway over the application and the revenue resulting from the rise in value of its token. So while TON will technically be a decentralized social media network, it will likely end up being dominated by a powerful few.

In examining the landscape, when a startup professes to decentralize some aspect of the internet with blockchain and cryptocurrencies, I take it with a grain of salt. When an established company makes the same claim, I take it with a whole bucket.

via PCMag.com: Tech Commentary

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.pcmag.com

The Sinking of the FBI

J. Edgar Hoover must be turning in his grave at what is happening to his venerable FBI.  Then again, given Hoover’s own proclivities to abuse his powers as the director of that agency, perhaps the predicament in which the bureau finds itself is a natural stage of evolution on an arc of governmental hubris.


It’s increasingly clear that the FBI is taking on water at an accelerating rate as new revelations come, fast and furious, in the political scandals engulfing Washington.  This week, for example, we see two adolescent-minded senior FBI officials, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, involved in virtually all aspects of the Hillary Clinton email server investigation and the Donald Trump “Russian collusion” (or is it “obstruction of justice” now?) investigation, acting like hormone-fueled high school lovers, discussing a “secret society” of Trump-haters one day after President Trump’s remarkable election.  We learned of this only because two patriotic congressmen, representatives Trey Gowdy and John Ratcliffe, former federal prosecutors both, revealed this stunning exchange to Fox News.  Was the “secret society” a tongue-in-cheek reference?  Given the mind-boggling behavior of the top echelons at the FBI and DOJ these days, one can’t be too sure.



The keel of the USS Federal Bureau of Investigation is starting to rise out of the water, like the RMS Titanic about 30 minutes after striking the iceberg.  One can almost hear the bodies of top law enforcement bureaucrats crashing against each other, like so much china on a dying vessel sinking under the waves, as the embattled organization faces exposure after exposure of truly outrageous and un-American, if not illegal, conduct.


This sad state of affairs represents the depressing collapse of a pillar of American culture for many of us who grew up revering it and the “G‑men” who populated it.  It did a wonderful job of cultivating that aura through the media and entertainment industries, often providing technical assistance to the producers of movies like The Silence of the Lambs.


For those of us over 40, who can forget watching the tough, suave FBI agent Lewis Erskine played by Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. in the eponymous television show, The FBI?  He was the epitome of cool and integrity.


This crafty self-promotion in popular culture has occurred over many decades, spawning countless such television series, movies, and books exalting the bureau.  My youngest, college-aged daughter is a devotee of Criminal Minds, yet another slick Hollywood rendering of hip, brilliant FBI agents solving complex serial murders through cunning and derring-do – all in the space of an hour, with commercial breaks, of course.


The tragic reality is that this apotheosis of American law enforcement, this symbol of truth, justice, and the American way, has become so corrupt, so politicized, and so diametrically opposed to its mission because of its recent actions that nothing short of its reconstitution is required – much as the KGB was reconstituted following the collapse of the Soviet Union.  (I never thought I would be drawing any sort of comparison between the FBI and the KGB, but those are the unfortunate circumstances in which we find ourselves.)


I have spent three decades working in intelligence and investigations in federal law enforcement, in corporate-sector investigations, and currently for the nonprofit organization leading much of the investigative work into the corruption of our own government.  I worked for the high-end opposition research firm, Investigative Group International, that was employed by the Clinton administration in the ’90s at the height of the scandals in which it was embroiled.  All of this is to say that I know the world of private intelligence and opposition research as well as anyone, and my comments are informed by practical experience from both a private investigative perspective and a law enforcement perspective.


What we are seeing today at the highest levels of our government should frighten all Americans.


As I laid out in detail in a recent interview for Judicial Watch, discussing the role of Fusion GPS, its interactions with the FBI, and Fusion founder Glenn Simpson’s testimony before a Senate committee, the evidence is rapidly emerging that senior officials in our government, most likely up to and including then-president of the United States Barack Obama, worked in concert to illicitly, and possibly criminally, derail the candidacy of the opposition party’s presidential candidate using fabricated information (or, as former FBI director James Comey described it, “salacious and unverified”) obtained by a private investigations firm from an enemy of the United States: Russia.


Even worse, once that effort to derail that candidacy failed and that candidate, Donald Trump, was elected, those same individuals used the same manufactured evidence as the basis to launch an investigation, employing the vast authority and technical resources of the United States government, whose ultimate goal, I believe, is to impeach and remove that duly elected president.


That, ladies and gentlemen, is a coup d’état.


Merriam-Webster defines a coup d’état as a “a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics.”


While the Hillary-FBI-DOJ-Fusion GPS cabal was not a violent coup, to be sure, it was certainly a decisive exercise of force in politics when it used, as has been reported, a fraud on the court to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on members of the opposing party’s presidential campaign.  In fact, it is far more insidious than the sort of coups we typically see in Africa and Latin America.  It required the subversion and corruption of numerous governmental agencies, not just the FBI – to effect: the Department of Justice and the National Security Agency to be sure, and possibly the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department, and other agencies as well.


I do not say this lightly.  As the son of a World War II veteran, the father of a currently serving member of the U.S. military, and an American citizen, I care deeply about this country, the Constitution, and the rule of law.  The American people need to wake up and understand the gravity of what is shaping up to be nothing short of an attempt to overthrow their government.


The sinking of the FBI may be the least of our worries.


God bless and save America.  


William F. Marshall has been an intelligence analyst and investigator in the government, the private sector, and the non-profit sector for over 30 years.  Presently, he is a senior investigator for Judicial Watch, Inc.  (The views expressed are the author’s alone and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.) 










J. Edgar Hoover must be turning in his grave at what is happening to his venerable FBI.  Then again, given Hoover’s own proclivities to abuse his powers as the director of that agency, perhaps the predicament in which the bureau finds itself is a natural stage of evolution on an arc of governmental hubris.


It’s increasingly clear that the FBI is taking on water at an accelerating rate as new revelations come, fast and furious, in the political scandals engulfing Washington.  This week, for example, we see two adolescent-minded senior FBI officials, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, involved in virtually all aspects of the Hillary Clinton email server investigation and the Donald Trump “Russian collusion” (or is it “obstruction of justice” now?) investigation, acting like hormone-fueled high school lovers, discussing a “secret society” of Trump-haters one day after President Trump’s remarkable election.  We learned of this only because two patriotic congressmen, representatives Trey Gowdy and John Ratcliffe, former federal prosecutors both, revealed this stunning exchange to Fox News.  Was the “secret society” a tongue-in-cheek reference?  Given the mind-boggling behavior of the top echelons at the FBI and DOJ these days, one can’t be too sure.


The keel of the USS Federal Bureau of Investigation is starting to rise out of the water, like the RMS Titanic about 30 minutes after striking the iceberg.  One can almost hear the bodies of top law enforcement bureaucrats crashing against each other, like so much china on a dying vessel sinking under the waves, as the embattled organization faces exposure after exposure of truly outrageous and un-American, if not illegal, conduct.


This sad state of affairs represents the depressing collapse of a pillar of American culture for many of us who grew up revering it and the “G‑men” who populated it.  It did a wonderful job of cultivating that aura through the media and entertainment industries, often providing technical assistance to the producers of movies like The Silence of the Lambs.


For those of us over 40, who can forget watching the tough, suave FBI agent Lewis Erskine played by Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. in the eponymous television show, The FBI?  He was the epitome of cool and integrity.


This crafty self-promotion in popular culture has occurred over many decades, spawning countless such television series, movies, and books exalting the bureau.  My youngest, college-aged daughter is a devotee of Criminal Minds, yet another slick Hollywood rendering of hip, brilliant FBI agents solving complex serial murders through cunning and derring-do – all in the space of an hour, with commercial breaks, of course.


The tragic reality is that this apotheosis of American law enforcement, this symbol of truth, justice, and the American way, has become so corrupt, so politicized, and so diametrically opposed to its mission because of its recent actions that nothing short of its reconstitution is required – much as the KGB was reconstituted following the collapse of the Soviet Union.  (I never thought I would be drawing any sort of comparison between the FBI and the KGB, but those are the unfortunate circumstances in which we find ourselves.)


I have spent three decades working in intelligence and investigations in federal law enforcement, in corporate-sector investigations, and currently for the nonprofit organization leading much of the investigative work into the corruption of our own government.  I worked for the high-end opposition research firm, Investigative Group International, that was employed by the Clinton administration in the ’90s at the height of the scandals in which it was embroiled.  All of this is to say that I know the world of private intelligence and opposition research as well as anyone, and my comments are informed by practical experience from both a private investigative perspective and a law enforcement perspective.


What we are seeing today at the highest levels of our government should frighten all Americans.


As I laid out in detail in a recent interview for Judicial Watch, discussing the role of Fusion GPS, its interactions with the FBI, and Fusion founder Glenn Simpson’s testimony before a Senate committee, the evidence is rapidly emerging that senior officials in our government, most likely up to and including then-president of the United States Barack Obama, worked in concert to illicitly, and possibly criminally, derail the candidacy of the opposition party’s presidential candidate using fabricated information (or, as former FBI director James Comey described it, “salacious and unverified”) obtained by a private investigations firm from an enemy of the United States: Russia.


Even worse, once that effort to derail that candidacy failed and that candidate, Donald Trump, was elected, those same individuals used the same manufactured evidence as the basis to launch an investigation, employing the vast authority and technical resources of the United States government, whose ultimate goal, I believe, is to impeach and remove that duly elected president.


That, ladies and gentlemen, is a coup d’état.


Merriam-Webster defines a coup d’état as a “a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics.”


While the Hillary-FBI-DOJ-Fusion GPS cabal was not a violent coup, to be sure, it was certainly a decisive exercise of force in politics when it used, as has been reported, a fraud on the court to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on members of the opposing party’s presidential campaign.  In fact, it is far more insidious than the sort of coups we typically see in Africa and Latin America.  It required the subversion and corruption of numerous governmental agencies, not just the FBI – to effect: the Department of Justice and the National Security Agency to be sure, and possibly the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department, and other agencies as well.


I do not say this lightly.  As the son of a World War II veteran, the father of a currently serving member of the U.S. military, and an American citizen, I care deeply about this country, the Constitution, and the rule of law.  The American people need to wake up and understand the gravity of what is shaping up to be nothing short of an attempt to overthrow their government.


The sinking of the FBI may be the least of our worries.


God bless and save America.  


William F. Marshall has been an intelligence analyst and investigator in the government, the private sector, and the non-profit sector for over 30 years.  Presently, he is a senior investigator for Judicial Watch, Inc.  (The views expressed are the author’s alone and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.) 





via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.americanthinker.com/

George Soros Spent Record Amount Lobbying During Trump’s First Year

Liberal billionaire George Soros spent more on lobbying during President Donald Trump’s first year in office than he has in any previous year, disclosure forms show.

The Open Society Policy Center, a D.C.-based 501 (c)(4) nonprofit that focuses on domestic and international advocacy efforts and is a separate entity from Soros’s Open Society Foundations, poured $16.2 million into lobbying throughout the entirety of 2017.

Soros’s group reported spending $4.6 million during the first half of 2017 on its lobbying efforts. During the third quarter, Soros added $1.25 million to the total. Most of the lobbying expenditures—$10.3 million—were spent during the fourth quarter, which spans from October 1 to December 31.

Soros ramped up his efforts as the year progressed by pushing funds toward issues that have been seen as a direct attack on the deep-pocketed financier, such as Hungary’s Bill on Foreign Funded Organizations (LexNGO), a crackdown on foreign-funded organizations in that country.

Hungary’s parliament approved the law that targets foreign-funded NGOs in June of last year, saying they could "threaten the country’s political and economic interests and interfere with the functioning of its institutions."

While the legislation does not mention Soros, who was born in Hungary and has given money to a number of NGOs in the country, by name, Hungarian politicians have said that they wanted to "sweep out" organizations tied to the financier, Bloomberg reported.

Soros also pushed funds to lobby on the Restricted First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2017, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2018, and the Preventing Preemptive War in North Korea Act of 2017, among others, according to the disclosure forms.  The Open Society Policy Center lobbied the Senate, House of Representatives, State Department, National Security Council, and the Department of Defense last year.

"We make different grants each year depending on what is happening in Congress and there was a lot going in 2017: Protecting immigrants and refugees, preserving fairness in the tax code, advocating for criminal justice reform, pressing for disaster relief for Puerto Rico, and promoting a progressive U.S. foreign policy," said Jonathan Kaplan, a spokesman for the Open Society Policy Center.

Between 2002 and 2012, the policy center reported spending a total of $19,120,000 lobbying Congress and agencies, an average of $1.9 million on lobbying per year. The most Soros had spent on lobbying prior to last year was $12.4 million in 2014.

The group’s disclosure forms also show that Soros has recruited the help of a number of outside lobbying shops in the past including Orion Strategies, the Mitchell Firm, and Glover Park Group, all D.C.-based firms, on top of its three in-house lobbyists.

The Open Society Policy Center hauled in $17 million in contributions in 2015, according to the group’s most recent tax forms. During that year, one of the group’s largest grant disbursements went to the Advocacy Fund, an organization that helps to navigate "lobbying, political and funding rules to win campaigns for social change," in the amount of $800,000.

The Advocacy Fund is involved with Demos, a New York-based public policy organization whose board of directors is chaired by Amelia Warren Tyagi, the daughter of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.). Indivisible, one of the most prominent anti-Trump groups today, is also listed under the Advocacy Fund’s projects.

Gara LaMarche, who sat on the board of directors of the policy center during the time covered by its most recent tax forms, and is still a member of its board, is now the president of the Democracy Alliance, a secretive donor club where Soros is a founding partner. The alliance consists of wealthy liberals who each vow to steer hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding to progressive groups.

The Free Beacon attended the group’s secretive fall investment conference held last November at the La Costa Resort and Spa in Carlsbad, Calif. and obtained confidential documents at the retreat where the group was planning its next steps in the "resistance."

Soros, along with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.), headlined the event.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.), a potential Democratic presidential hopeful for 2020, introduced Soros with a "special videotaped message." Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.) also delivered a video message to the group.  Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D.) and Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D., Minn.), who chairs the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), were in attendance.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D., Calif.), not listed on the agenda, was also spotted at the resort.

David Brock, the former conservative investigative journalist turned Clinton loyalist and founder of Media Matters for America, was also not listed in the agenda but was present at the gathering.

Brock held his own donor conference at the Turnberry Isle Miami resort in Aventura, Fla., last January where he huddled with more than 100 liberal donors to map out how they would "kick Donald Trump’s ass."

The Free Beacon obtained the private and confidential memo Brock handed out to donors at the event outlining his four-year agenda to attack Trump and Republicans using Media Matters, American Bridge, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, and Shareblue.

Update: The article has been updated to specify that Gara LaMarche was a member of the the Open Society Policy Center’s board of directors, but not the group’s director, during the time of the 2015 tax forms. 

The post George Soros Spent Record Amount Lobbying During Trump’s First Year appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

‘F*ck This Conservative, F*ck This Person!’ Illegal Aliens Charge Pro-Amnesty Thom Tillis’ Senate Office

‘F*ck This Conservative, F*ck This Person!’ Illegal Aliens Charge Pro-Amnesty Thom Tillis’ Senate Office



Illegal aliens charged into pro-amnesty Sen. Thom Tillis’ (R-NC) Senate office on Capitol Hill demanding an immediate amnesty for all 12 to 30 million illegal aliens living in the United States, hurling insults in the process.

As the group of illegal aliens and open borders activists — with the George Soros-funded group “United We Dream” — stormed Tillis’ office demanding amnesty, one illegal alien from North Carolina shouted, “F*ck this conservative! F*ck this person!”

The illegal alien activist shouted:

I see no leadership in this office. This office is supposed to protect me. This office is supposed to make me feel like home.

I’ve already talked to Thom Tillis in person and he looked me in my face and told me that we have until March 5. He told me to my face that undocumented youth are not immigrants, are not priority. I’m not a priority.

F*ck this conservative! F*ck this person!

Tillis is one of the most pro-open borders Senators in Congress, authoring the SUCCEED Act this year with Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) which would give amnesty to at least 2.5 million eligible illegal aliens in the country, as Breitbart News reported.

Tillis is a close ally to the big business lobby and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which supports expansive amnesty for illegal aliens and increase legal immigration to the U.S. in order to drive down wages for American workers and make labor costs cheaper for employers.

Previously, Tillis has continuously said he wants more multinational companies in the U.S. to hire cheaper, imported foreign workers for the blue-collar and white-collar job industries. Before being elected in 2006, Tillis worked at IBM, one of the largest outsourcers of American jobs, now employing more workers in India than the U.S.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com