LOL: HuffPost Attempts To Rig Poll Against Trump. Things Go Terribly Wrong.

HuffPost tried with all its might to run an anti-Trump poll, but ended up belly-flopping spectacularly.

In a Twitter poll, the left-wing outlet asked users to rate President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech, offering four differing options to choose from. Of course, three of the four options were negative.

The one positive option, though, racked up 77% of all votes:

Classic.

The Twitter poll was actually pretty representative of what the American people overwhelmingly thought of Trump’s SOTU address. CBS polling found 75% of Americans approving of the speech, scoring particularly high with Independents and Republicans.

Adding insult to HuffPost’s self-inflicted injury, Trump is rising in general popularity, too. Monmouth Polling found Trump to have increased in popularity dramatically over the course of January, hitting 45% approval.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Murderous Hamas Condemns U.S. for Designating Its Leader a Terrorist

TEL AVIV — Hamas, a murderous terrorist organization committed to Israel’s destruction, condemned on Wednesday the decision by the U.S. State Department to designate Hamas’s politburo leader, Ismail Haniyeh, as a specially designated global terrorist.

A statement released by the State Department said that Haniyeh maintains connections with Hamas’s so-called military wing and is involved in attacks on civilians. Hamas’s “military wing” is responsible for scores of deadly suicide bombings, shootings and rocket attacks.

“Ismail Haniyeh has been involved in Hamas’ campaign of terrorism against Israel for years and even decades,” Ambassador Nathan A. Sales, the State Department’s Coordinator for Counterterrorism, stated. “The United States is not fooled by any attempt by Hamas to rebrand itself. We know it for what it is, a terror organization committed to the destruction of the State of Israel.”

In response, Hamas released a statement saying that Haniyeh is a prime minister elected by a majority of the Palestinian people and that his inclusion on the list of terrorists is a dangerous development “and a violation of international law, which gives the Palestinian people the right to defend themselves, to fight the occupation and elect its leadership.”

Hamas failed to mention its deliberate targeting of Israeli civilians.

It was also written in the statement that the American decision is a “cover” for Israel to continue its “crimes” against the Palestinian people “and a green light to harm their leader.”

Hamas apologists on social media also responded to the American inclusion of Haniyeh on the terrorism list.

“Crusaders and Zionists full of hate: American State Department decides Haniyeh and other figures are terrorists threatening the stability of the Middle East,” tweeted Hamed al-Ali, a Kuwaiti cleric.

The Twitter account Palestine Post criticized the decision, writing at the end of their post, “We swear to Allah, the decision should be a source of pride.”

“When the Americans include Haniyeh on the terror list, we have nothing to say but that we are proud of terror,” wrote Palestinian Layla Kilani. “Is it possible to earn a greater achievement than this? Because the respectable man only fights the enemies of Allah.”

Majed al-Raiisi, a media figure in the United Arab Emirates, wrote about the meeting between Qatar and America that was held yesterday in the U.S., tweeting, “Yesterday Qatar paid billions for declarations of American support. Today, the U.S. puts Ismail Haniyeh, who is close to the Qatari regime, on the terror list. As usual, your money went to nothing.”

“Stand proudly and wave the flag of victory,” wrote Adaham Abu Salmiyeh, a Palestinian journalist and activist close to Hamas, alongside a photo of Haniyeh making the V-for-victory sign.

“Hamas leaders are between the oppression of the Israeli occupation inside and the American siege outside,” wrote Amro Abdulhadi, an Islamist politician in Egypt. “The people who are happier about Haniyeh’s place on the terror list are Muhamad Dahlan (a Fatah official), Muhamad bin Zayed (Emirati crown prince) and Sissi (Egyptian president).”

“The American inclusion of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh on the terror list proves for the millionth time that the current president of the U.S. is a criminal called a president because of his job,” wrote Egyptian journalist Ahmad Abdeljawad. “It also proves that Hamas continues to worry the Zionists.”

The Twitter account of Palestinian teen Ahed Tamimi, a girl who became famous for slapping an Israeli soldier and whose account is being run by her father since she was arrested by Israeli authorities, tweeted, “Congratulations to the leader and national symbol Ismail Haniyeh. We say to the enemies of our people that the threats of the occupation and the terror lists of the American government don’t scare us.”

Abdullah Sharif, an Egyptian Islamist poet wrote, “Ismail Haniyeh, if you are a terrorist as they’ve catalogued you, then I’m following in your footsteps.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

German Parliament Debates Increasing Chain Migration

German Parliament Debates Increasing Chain Migration



BERLIN (AP) – German lawmakers are debating regulations over migrants’ rights to bring close relatives to the country, a topic which has been a major issue of coalition talks between Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative Union bloc and the centre-left Social Democrats.

The two parties reached a consensus on the issue earlier this week, one which Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere urged parliament Thursday to accept as a fair compromise.

As it stands, close relatives can’t join migrants with a status below full asylum but the rule expires in mid-March. The proposed compromise would allow for 1,000 per month in that category to be allowed in, starting in August, plus people considered hardship cases under existing rules.

De Maiziere says “our compromise stands for humanity and accountability, for integration and limitations.”

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook: Breitbart London

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

THE RESISTANCE IS OUT OF CASH: Democrats Run Their Party Like They Do Big Cities

THE RESISTANCE IS OUT OF CASH: Democrats Hit Rock Bottom – Party Is Near Insolvency

The Resistance is out of cash — Dead Broke

Cash and spend Democrats run their party like they run their cities.


A look at lovely Detroit — once the richest county in America before Democrats took control.

In December alone, the DNC’s debt ballooned from $2.6M to a whopping $6.1M, putting them on the verge of insolvency. And that was before Vice News’ bombshell report that the DNC had failed to deliver millions in grants they promised to state parties.

Vice News has more on the Democrat quagmire:

Last July, eight months after the Democratic Party experienced one of its most devastating defeats in history, DNC chairman Tom Perez announced an “unprecedented” rebuild of the party from the ground up with a $10 million fund dedicated to state parties. That fund could provide hundreds of thousands of dollars to each state party, an enormous sum for often cash-strapped organizations.

That money hasn’t arrived.

In fact, the DNC didn’t even have $10 million on hand as of November 30 and declined to comment on whether it had the money now. And even if it did, it wouldn’t distribute the money right away, frustrating state party officials who are anxious about the coming midterm elections and describe the effort to rebuild as slow and halting.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

INSANE: MSNBC’s Joy Reid Says Trump Touting ‘Church, Family, Police, Military’ Panders To ‘1950s-Era Nationalism’

On Tuesday evening, MSNBC’s Joy Reid, fed up with President Trump’s incessant focus on American patriotism, shot off a tweet designed to take him down a peg:

The art of politics used to lie in somehow convincing your political opponents to side against motherhood, the flag, and apple pie. Now Democrats do it by instinct.

The insanity of this statement is obvious: church, family, police, military, and the national anthem are not 1950s “tropes.” They are historical unifiers in the United States – and they remain so. Most Americans still attend church, and without the social fabric provided by religious community, communities tend to devolve into atomistic individualism. Family is the greatest bulwark against poverty and violence in American society. Fully 57 percent of Americans still have a lot of trust in police; 72 percent have a lot of trust in the military. And most Americans still have a sneaking fondness for the American flag.

But Reid sees these symbols as divisive. She thinks that an America proud of its exceptional heritage and its pillar institutions is somehow intolerant. If that’s the side Democrats want to take, so be it – but they should be aware that most Americans are still proud of that signifier. Trump knows that. Democrats used to. Not anymore, apparently.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

WSJ: US Olympic Committee knew about Nassar abuse for a year — and did nothing

Did the US Olympic Committee remain silent about sexual abuse by a physician preying on young gymnasts under their authority? Last week, the USOC ostentatiously demanded the resignations of all board members at USA Gymnastics over the handling of serial sex offender Larry Nassar. Today, the Wall Street Journal reports that the USOC remained silent for a year about those assaults even while having graphic descriptions of the crimes:

The U.S. Olympic Committee didn’t intervene in USA Gymnastics’ handling of sexual-abuse allegations against longtime national-team doctor Larry Nassar in 2015, even after USA Gymnastics’ then-president told two top USOC executives that an internal investigation had uncovered possible criminal behavior by the doctor against Olympic athletes.

The communications—a July 2015 phone call and a September 2015 email described to The Wall Street Journal by people familiar with the matter—shed new light on the Olympic Committee’s knowledge of a scandal that has since engulfed American gymnastics.

In July 2015, fourteen months before the athletes themselves finally made Nassar’s sexual assaults public, then-USOC president Steve Penny told chief executive Scott Blackmun about an allegation by an athlete to an internal investigator of Nassar’s assaults:

An Olympic gymnast had described, in a July 24 conversation with an internal investigator, what appeared to amount to sexual assault by a team doctor. At the investigator’s recommendation, Mr. Penny said he planned to report the matter to law enforcement, according to the person. ​

Mr. Blackmun told Mr. Penny to “do what he had to do,” the person familiar with the call said. Mr. Blackmun provided no further guidance to USA Gymnastics on the matter in the months to come.

Two months later, Mr. Penny emailed the USOC’s longtime chief security officer, Larry Buendorf, detailing three top gymnasts’ allegations against Dr. Nassar, including a graphic description of a purported treatment Dr. Nassar used, which at least one gymnast said involved inserting his finger into her vagina. The email was described to the Journal by people who have reviewed the correspondence.

The email appears to be the first documented instance in which a USA Gymnastics official mentions Dr. Nassar by name to a USOC official.

By September 2015, USOC leadership had knowledge of at least one victim, a graphic description of the assault, and the name of the perpetrator. What did they do with this information? Nothing at all, apparently. In fact, the USOC has maintained ever since that they had no knowledge of Nassar’s assaults until September 2016 — which this e-mail, if accurate, completely refutes.

Blackmun responded to the WSJ before the story went live, telling reporters that he “encouraged Mr. Penny to turn the matter over to law enforcement.” That still leaves the question as to why Blackmun himself didn’t call law enforcement, or follow up to make sure that Penny had done so. After all, as chief executive, Blackmun surely had to be aware of Nassar’s continued presence at USAG; as the USOC threat last week made clear, USAG existed as an official Olympics group only under the aegis of the USOC. And if he wasn’t aware in the normal course of business, after hearing those allegations Blackmun sure as hell should have followed up on it.

Rather than take action, the three men with knowledge of the abuses remained silent. Why? Both the Senate and House plan hearings into these scandals, and they should subpoena all three men to answer that question. But it shouldn’t end there; who else at USOC knew about what was happening at USA Gymnastics and Nasser? Are there other Nassars yet to be uncovered in Olympics organizations, and do officials in these organizations already know about them, too?

When the USOC issued their ultimatum to USAG last week, I wrote that “this threat from the USOC looks like an attempt to throw USAG to the wolves in order to keep from getting eaten themselves.” Maybe it’s more accurate to say that they wanted to throw everyone else off the scent. Talk about poseurs; this would qualify for a Captain Louis Renault award if it wasn’t so disgusting and self-serving.

Congress should issue the same ultimatum to USOC, demanding the immediate resignation of all board members there too, or face the removal of its congressional charter to represent the US in the Olympics. In fact, perhaps it’s better to burn this to the ground and start over from scratch with an organization that gets a lot more oversight and focuses more on the athletes than the executives.

The post WSJ: US Olympic Committee knew about Nassar abuse for a year — and did nothing appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Twitter Censorship CRUSHED As Conservatives Send #FullOfSchiff Hashtag VIRAL

The hashtag #FullofSchiff began trending Thursday following Rep. Adam Schiff’s latest attempt to discredit the FISA abuse memo set for release today. Conservatives from across America and beyond are fighting back after the California Democrat claimed Wednesday evening that House Intelligence chairman Devin Nunes made secret “material changes,” to the memo without the consent of congressional investigators.

Credit: @thebradfordfile

As has been the case since Schiff began fighting against the memo’s release, his false alarmist tactic was squished like a bug.

Missed Schiff hitting the panic button last night? The California Democrat tweeted this Wednesday evening:

“BREAKING: Discovered late tonight that Chairman Nunes made material changes to the memo he sent to White House – changes not approved by the Committee. White House therefore reviewing a document the Committee has not approved for release.”

Shortly after Schiff’s tweet, the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York set the record straight. The “material changes,” were in fact mere “‘grammatical and clarifying’ fixes,” along with a modification requested by Democrats.

“On FBI-requested change to House Intel memo, remember that Nunes showed memo to Wray on Sunday, to two FBI officials on Monday, and WH showed to five more FBI officials on Tuesday. Not shocking that change would be made to address FBI concerns,” added York.

“On re-vote: Committee can just do it Monday, with White House release immediately after. World won’t end. OTOH, Congress often does not make members re-vote on ‘technical and conforming’ changes. If these changes go beyond that, they can re-vote.”

Tired of the Schiff’s smears, leaks and lies, Conservatives launched the Twitter hashtag .

Independent journalist and author Jack Posobiec kicked things off.

“Get trending!” tweeted Posobiec.

GOP insider Arthur Schwartz let the House Intelligence Committee member have it, tweeting “Desperate & pathetic leaker @RepAdamSchiff is going to have a rough day. Because he’s .”

Infowars Editor-at-Large Paul Joseph Watson lent a huge helping hand to the cause.

“It would be awful if began trending,” tweeted Watson.

Watson also pointed out the hashtag no longer trends on his end.

was trending. Presumably, Twitter intervened.”

Donald Trump Jr. helped blast the hashtag into viral territory, tweeting an article about Schiff claiming the memo was altered.

RebelTV host John Cardillo called on his follower to get  trending.

“Hey all, needs to trend. It’s nowhere near popular enough considering how perfectly it fits,” tweeted Cardillo.

Former Trump state campaign official James Brower discovered Twitter appears to be censoring the hashtag.

 

Trump surrogate Scott Presler called Schiff out on his lies.

Author Kevin Jackson tweeted, I’m sure @AdamSchiffCA will claim that Russian BOTS are the reason he’s trending!”

“Do we really trust this guy to tell us what is good for our country? I didn’t vote for President Schiff.. ,” tweeted the founder of New Right US.

The founder of New Right US also raised concerns about the hashtag possibly being suppressed.

Radio host Mike Opelka chimed in, “Happy to help, — can we add ?”

The post Twitter Censorship CRUSHED As Conservatives Send #FullOfSchiff Hashtag VIRAL appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Law & Order SVU Episode Depicts Ann Coulter-Like Character Getting Violently Raped At Right-Wing Rally

The most recent “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit” episode got political, something the show has done in the past. A conservative “extreme commentator” is violently raped at a right-wing rally by Antfia members during the episode, titled “Info Wars.”

Many online speculated that the character was depicting conservative author and commentator Ann Coulter.

“After a female pundit is assaulted during a protest, Benson and Barba struggle to put their political beliefs aside in order to help bring the attacker to justice,” reads the NBC description of the episode.

Fansided.com described the episode thusly:

Wednesday’s episode is called “Info Wars” (yes, like the website) and deals with a protest at which a pundit played by Rhea Seehorn (best known as Kim Wexler from Better Call Saul) is attacked. Her political points of view aren’t on the same page as those of Olivia Benson (Mariska Hargitay) and ADA Rafael Barba (Raul Esparza), but they’re not going to let their opinions on politics stop them in their pursuit of justice, right? Of course not. But expect someone to have a problem.

Journalist Ian Miles Cheong suggested the character was based on Lauren Southern or Cassandra Fairbanks, two popular right-wing journalists.

“I just watched this,” said Fairbanks. “It’s definitely based on Ann Coulter and it is disgusting. They throw away the case and pretty much tell her to go f*** herself. I’m never watching this show again.”

Fairbanks added:

Watch the promo, below:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

WaPo Forced to Change SOTU Headline After Liberals Have a Meltdown

The Washington Post’s new slogan, after Donald Trump’s election, has been “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” Thankfully, the newspaper’s capitulation to its own liberal readership was caught in the full light of Twitter.

The capitulation, as noted by The Daily Caller, had to do with President Trump’s State of the Union speech on Tuesday. The Post had originally titled its front page package on the address, “A call for bipartisanship.”

Then the Post shared it on its Twitter feed, and all hell broke loose.

Here was the original headline:

TRENDING: Dems Sweating Bullets After Numbers Come in From SOTU Speech

And here was the unmitigated meltdown that happened on social media when The Washington Post called the speech what it was — a call for bipartisanship.

Do you think the media is biased against Trump?

Actually, there was quite a bit that was bipartisan about it (even if top Democrats didn’t answer the call.)

Trump asked lawmakers to come together on a plan for immigration, infrastructure, and other problems facing the country. He also saluted American heroes, which would have appealed to even liberal Democrats not all that long ago.

But the Post’s readers weren’t buying it.

RELATED: Michelle Finally Revealed the Special Gift Melania Gave Her on Inauguration Day

It didn’t take long for the WaPo to announce that the headline was altered after the first edition.

In fairness, it’s not unusual for a large newspaper to change headlines between editions on a major story. And the new headline is hardly an attack on the president. But in an era when the established news outlets have dropped even a veneer of “objectivity” in their zeal to revenge Hillary Clinton’s embarrassing loss in 2016, giving a newspaper like the Post the benefit of the doubt borders on naive.

The new headline used a quote from Trump’s speech. But to a slavering anti-Trump activist in D.C. and its suburbs, “A ‘new American moment’” could have just the right ambiguous, ominous tone the newspaper was looking for.

The Post’s decision to change its headline had to have some connection to the whiny “cancel my subscription” meltdowns that made up a goodly portion of its readership’s reaction to the first one. I suppose any publication is ultimately answerable to its readership, but by so obviously capitulating to it, The Washington Post has proven exactly what it is. I don’t want to hear anything more about how “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” especially when the paper’s objectivity (such as it was) died long ago.

One can imagine readers’ responses to this one. “Not as bad, but where’s the reference to Hitler?” “Sorry, but you’re no longer part of #theresistance, WaPo! Give up your pink hat!” “WORSE THAN NIXON IMPEACH NOW!!”

Actually, one doesn’t need to imagine, thanks to the magic of Twitter:

From the sounds of things, an informed democracy dies not in darkness, but in groupthink and reactionary anti-Trump bias.

Do better, indeed.

Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter with your thoughts on the WaPo’s capitulation to its readership.

What are your thoughts on this change in headlines? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Every New York prison inmate will soon get a free tablet — here’s what it’s for

Criminals sent to state prison in New York will soon get a free tablet to help them pass the time, according to WPIX-TV.

Why do they get a tablet?

The New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision is getting the tablets as part of a deal with JPay, a company that provides corrections-related services. State funds won’t be used to pay for the tablets.

Inmates will be able to read books, listen to music and access educational content on the tablets, as well as communicate with family and friends through a secure email system.

The email communications would be limited to scheduled times at controlled kiosks, and they can only be sent to approved recipients.

JPay will make money on the deal if inmates purchase any additional books or other items with the tablet.

What is the purpose?

DoC Commissioner Anthony Annucci said the inmates are getting the tablets because it will help them better prepare for re-entry into society once they’re released.

Annucci said the tablets will “improve operations and interactions with family and friends” at no cost to taxpayers.

The tablets also serve as a way for inmates to file grievances with the prison, or to file reports of rape or other incidents.

The Corrections Department reported more than 52,000 inmates in state prisons as of March 2016.

How have people reacted to this?

Not everyone is happy about convicted criminals having the luxury of a tablet, when there isn’t always access to that kind of technology for schools or people in poverty.

“Little is done for the homeless, mentally ill, and hard-working people who can’t afford tablets in New York state,” Ed Mullins, head of the NYPD sergeants union, told the New York Post.

There are also concerns about inmates learning how to hack the tablets to potentially access the internet or misuse them in other ways.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com