Hardly a Stir When Starbucks Denied a Cop

Kudos for Sheriff David Clarke for reminding us of the double standard practiced by the self-righteous guardians of social justice such as Starbucks, who flagellate themselves in public over the injustice of denying non-paying patrons use of their facilities – patrons who happen to be black:


Not too long ago a Philadelphia Starbucks refused to let a police officer use the restroom telling him it was for paying customers.  Don’t remember Starbucks closing 8000 stores for sensitivity training toward police.



In 2015, an unnamed Philadelphia police sergeant entered a downtown Philadelphia Starbucks and asked to use the restroom.  He might have been the one who would have responded if that Starbucks were being robbed or its employees or customers were assaulted.  He was told in no uncertain terms that he could not and should find a restroom down the street.  The unnamed officer’s story was posted on Facebook by Joe Leighthardt, another Philadelphia officer:


So I walk into the Starbucks at 13th and Chestnut in full uniform and ask the young blonde liberal behind the counter if I could use their public bathroom for which you need a key code and she states, in a loud voice so all the other customers can hear that the bathroom is for paying customers only. I then ask in a very polite manner if I could please use it. She then states in the same loud manner and a smirk “Are you a paying customer?” It was at this point that I realized what she was doing. As I walked out with my hand up and while she continued loudly to tell me about the bathroom down the street, I was even more astonished that the many customers and other employees said nothing and seemed indifferent. This is the world cops live in anymore. It’s hip for this generation to berate and totally disrespect cops in front of the public and praise cop killers as the heroes of they’re [sic] time. I never post things but I hope my fellow brothers and sisters in blue see this and know that we have each other… and not to patronize that Starbucks.


Starbucks did somewhat apologize for the incident, but there was no national mea culpa by the executive officers of Starbucks or the shutting down of its 8,000 stores and turning them into temporary re-education camps for employees who for the most part probably don’t have a biased bone in their bodies and who depend on police for their safety inside and outside their stores.


Officer Leighthardt noted as much:


In the post, Leighthardt‎ wrote, “Thought you world like to know this happened at your 1301 Chestnut St in Philadelphia.  In a time when police are being made the enemy, Your clerk pulls this nonsense.  And might I point out, this store is a frequent caller to police for some sort of service.” …


“No one is asking for special treatment, but when your ‘office’ is a police car and you’re running from job to job in Philadelphia, I’d he supposed to hold in?  Pee on the sidewalk?  I’ll bet your job has a bathroom within 100 yards,” Leighthardt wrote.  “Cops don’t.  And this particular Starbucks calls the police several times a week for things as simple as someone sitting on the bench outside their property.”


We live in a world where black lives matter but blue lives matter not so much.  Just ask the families of the two Florida police officers gunned down while having lunch at a Chinese restaurant.


Two Florida sheriff’s deputies were shot and killed while eating in a restaurant Thursday afternoon by an attacker found dead outside shortly after, police said[.] …


“I don’t have answers to why this happened,” Gilchrist County Sheriff Robert Schultz said at a news briefing.Schultz identified the slain officers as Sgt. Noel Ramirez, 30, a seven-year law enforcement veteran, and Deputy Taylor Lindsey, 25, a three-year law law [sic] enforcement veteran.  Schultz said Ramirez had children and was married, while Lindsey was not married but had a girlfriend. …


“We’re not going to make this a political issue, other than the fact: What do you expect happens when you demonize law enforcement to the extent that it’s been demonized?” Schultz asked.  “Every type of hate, every type of putdown that you can think of.  The only thing these men were guilty of was wanting to protect you and me.”


Closing 8,000 stores is a big financial hit, money that could have been spent to help inner-city kids get an education, or a meal, or clothes for school or to fight gang crime and drugs:


On Tuesday, Starbucks announced plans to close all 8,000 stores across the US for the afternoon of May 29.  Starbucks said in a statement it plans to “conduct racial-bias education geared toward preventing discrimination in our stores” during the period[.] …


“The company’s founding values are based on humanity and inclusion,” executive chairman Howard Schultz said in a statement.  “We will learn from our mistakes and reaffirm our commitment to creating a safe and welcoming environment for every customer.”


While the decision to close stores to train employees on issues of racial discrimination is unprecedented, Starbucks has done something similar once before under Schultz’s leadership[.] …


In February 2008, Starbucks closed all 7,100 of its stores for three and a half hours to train employees.  Schultz had recently returned as CEO to turn the company around as it struggled to repair its reputation and grow sales after a period of overexpansion. 


The closures cost the company an estimated $6 million, according to Schultz’s 2011 book “Onward: How Starbucks Fought for Its Life without Losing Its Soul.”  However, Schultz maintained that it was worth the financial cost and the mockery the company endured to put Starbucks back on the road to recovery. 


Self-survival and political correctness are prime motivators for Starbucks, but not the indignity and disrespect shown a Philadelphia officer in 2015.  No grandiose mea culpas, no mass closings, and no employee re-education.  Starbucks’s social conscience did not extend to those who risk their lives for the safety of its employees and customers.


Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.










Kudos for Sheriff David Clarke for reminding us of the double standard practiced by the self-righteous guardians of social justice such as Starbucks, who flagellate themselves in public over the injustice of denying non-paying patrons use of their facilities – patrons who happen to be black:


Not too long ago a Philadelphia Starbucks refused to let a police officer use the restroom telling him it was for paying customers.  Don’t remember Starbucks closing 8000 stores for sensitivity training toward police.


In 2015, an unnamed Philadelphia police sergeant entered a downtown Philadelphia Starbucks and asked to use the restroom.  He might have been the one who would have responded if that Starbucks were being robbed or its employees or customers were assaulted.  He was told in no uncertain terms that he could not and should find a restroom down the street.  The unnamed officer’s story was posted on Facebook by Joe Leighthardt, another Philadelphia officer:


So I walk into the Starbucks at 13th and Chestnut in full uniform and ask the young blonde liberal behind the counter if I could use their public bathroom for which you need a key code and she states, in a loud voice so all the other customers can hear that the bathroom is for paying customers only. I then ask in a very polite manner if I could please use it. She then states in the same loud manner and a smirk “Are you a paying customer?” It was at this point that I realized what she was doing. As I walked out with my hand up and while she continued loudly to tell me about the bathroom down the street, I was even more astonished that the many customers and other employees said nothing and seemed indifferent. This is the world cops live in anymore. It’s hip for this generation to berate and totally disrespect cops in front of the public and praise cop killers as the heroes of they’re [sic] time. I never post things but I hope my fellow brothers and sisters in blue see this and know that we have each other… and not to patronize that Starbucks.


Starbucks did somewhat apologize for the incident, but there was no national mea culpa by the executive officers of Starbucks or the shutting down of its 8,000 stores and turning them into temporary re-education camps for employees who for the most part probably don’t have a biased bone in their bodies and who depend on police for their safety inside and outside their stores.


Officer Leighthardt noted as much:


In the post, Leighthardt‎ wrote, “Thought you world like to know this happened at your 1301 Chestnut St in Philadelphia.  In a time when police are being made the enemy, Your clerk pulls this nonsense.  And might I point out, this store is a frequent caller to police for some sort of service.” …


“No one is asking for special treatment, but when your ‘office’ is a police car and you’re running from job to job in Philadelphia, I’d he supposed to hold in?  Pee on the sidewalk?  I’ll bet your job has a bathroom within 100 yards,” Leighthardt wrote.  “Cops don’t.  And this particular Starbucks calls the police several times a week for things as simple as someone sitting on the bench outside their property.”


We live in a world where black lives matter but blue lives matter not so much.  Just ask the families of the two Florida police officers gunned down while having lunch at a Chinese restaurant.


Two Florida sheriff’s deputies were shot and killed while eating in a restaurant Thursday afternoon by an attacker found dead outside shortly after, police said[.] …


“I don’t have answers to why this happened,” Gilchrist County Sheriff Robert Schultz said at a news briefing.Schultz identified the slain officers as Sgt. Noel Ramirez, 30, a seven-year law enforcement veteran, and Deputy Taylor Lindsey, 25, a three-year law law [sic] enforcement veteran.  Schultz said Ramirez had children and was married, while Lindsey was not married but had a girlfriend. …


“We’re not going to make this a political issue, other than the fact: What do you expect happens when you demonize law enforcement to the extent that it’s been demonized?” Schultz asked.  “Every type of hate, every type of putdown that you can think of.  The only thing these men were guilty of was wanting to protect you and me.”


Closing 8,000 stores is a big financial hit, money that could have been spent to help inner-city kids get an education, or a meal, or clothes for school or to fight gang crime and drugs:


On Tuesday, Starbucks announced plans to close all 8,000 stores across the US for the afternoon of May 29.  Starbucks said in a statement it plans to “conduct racial-bias education geared toward preventing discrimination in our stores” during the period[.] …


“The company’s founding values are based on humanity and inclusion,” executive chairman Howard Schultz said in a statement.  “We will learn from our mistakes and reaffirm our commitment to creating a safe and welcoming environment for every customer.”


While the decision to close stores to train employees on issues of racial discrimination is unprecedented, Starbucks has done something similar once before under Schultz’s leadership[.] …


In February 2008, Starbucks closed all 7,100 of its stores for three and a half hours to train employees.  Schultz had recently returned as CEO to turn the company around as it struggled to repair its reputation and grow sales after a period of overexpansion. 


The closures cost the company an estimated $6 million, according to Schultz’s 2011 book “Onward: How Starbucks Fought for Its Life without Losing Its Soul.”  However, Schultz maintained that it was worth the financial cost and the mockery the company endured to put Starbucks back on the road to recovery. 


Self-survival and political correctness are prime motivators for Starbucks, but not the indignity and disrespect shown a Philadelphia officer in 2015.  No grandiose mea culpas, no mass closings, and no employee re-education.  Starbucks’s social conscience did not extend to those who risk their lives for the safety of its employees and customers.


Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

PAY DIRT=> Rep. Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED When DOJ Started Spying on Trump — All Politics (VIDEO)

PAY DIRT=> Rep. Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED When DOJ Started Spying on Trump — All Politics (VIDEO)

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Maria Bartiromo this morning on Sunday Morning Futures.

During the discussion Nunes, who is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told Maria the DOJ had was NO EVIDENCE of wrongdoing when they started to spy on the Donald Trump campaign.
It was all for political reasons — which is immoral, unethical and illegal.

Rep. Nunes: This is really important to us because the intelligence investigation uses the tools of our intelligence services that are not supposed to be used on American citizens. So, we’ve long wanted to know what intelligence did you have that actually led to this investigation. So what we found now after the investigators have reviewed it is in fact there was no intelligence. So we have a traditional partnership with what’s called the Five Eyes Agreement…

Maria Bartiromo: Mr. Chairman you’ve got to explain what you just said. I think this is extraordinary. That you’re telling us that in order for the FBI, the Department of Justice to launch an investigation into so-called collusion between President Trump and the Russians there was no official intelligence used. Then how did this investigation start?

Rep. Nunes: I think that is the point. We don’t understand and never understood.

This is pay dirt folks.
The Obama DOJ NEVER had any intelligence that Trump was working with the Russians.
They started spying on him and his campaign and family anyway.
It was all politics.

Via Sunday Morning Futures:

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

YETI suddenly severs ties with NRA without reason. Now the free market is responding in a big way.

YETI Coolers, known for its popular coolers and cups, is one of the most popular outdoor brands in America. But the company seemingly stepped on its customer base last week when it severed ties with the National Rifle Association.

And now the free market is responding in a big way.

What happened?

The NRA announced on Friday that YETI had cut ties with the NRA Foundation, the pro-Second Amendment organization’s charitable arm. YETI had been a longtime partner of the NRA and its products were routinely raffled at NRA charity events, which raise money for youth programs nationwide.

In a letter, the NRA-ILA — the NRA’s lobbying arm — said YETI should be “ashamed” of its decision, which came suddenly and without explanation.

“That certainly isn’t sportsmanlike. In fact, YETI should be ashamed. They have declined to continue helping America’s young people enjoy outdoor recreational activities,” the letter said. “These activities enable them to appreciate America and enjoy our natural resources with wholesome and healthy outdoor recreational and educational programs.”

While YETI failed to offer an explanation, the move may be related to the national boycott of the NRA, which began in February. That boycott, which followed the tragic mass killing in Parkland, Florida, forced numerous longtime NRA supporters to end their relationships with the NRA. At the time, the left was pressuring NRA supporters to bail under the threat of boycott.

Still, the announcement bewildered many NRA supporters. After all, YETI’s consumer base overlaps with the demographic of NRA members and those who support what the NRA stands for. And unfortunately for YETI, its decision to move away from the NRA sparked a massive free market response.

What was the response?

The response from NRA members, supporters and generally anyone who loves the outdoors and supports what the NRA stands for was immediate.

By Sunday, a full-scale boycott of YETI was underway and the hashtag #BoycottYETI trended on social media.

Some people said YETI’s decision prompted them to sell their YETI products:

Other people vowed to never purchase YETI products again while encouraging the boycott:

Image source: screenshot
Image source: screenshot

Still, others encouraged people to buy coolers from YETI’s competitors, such as Grizzly Coolers:

One person even advertised a window decal remover, so people with YETI decals on their vehicles could safely remove them:

The writer’s perspective: How is this boycott different from the left’s boycott of the NRA?

There is one major difference that distinguishes this boycott with the earlier boycott of the NRA: the NRA boycott was orchestrated by the far-left — including big money donors — while the YETI boycott developed organically.

Indeed, one of the best features of a capitalistic economy is that consumers are somewhat freely able to choose which businesses they give their hard-earned money to. When businesses make decisions consumers do not agree with, they are free to react with their dollars.

However, what is so bad about boycotts orchestrated by the far-left is they are anything but organic. As TheBlaze recently explored, they almost always come from a place of manipulation — which has absolutely no connection to freedom or liberty.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Pro-gun Parkland survivor rips Obama over essay celebrating student gun control activists

Kyle Kashuv, a pro-gun survivor of the Parkland, Florida, mass killing, has spoken out against former President Barack Obama for writing an essay in which he celebrates the gun control activist students of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

What did Obama say in the essay?

In the essay for  Time’s “100 Most Influential People” feature, Obama celebrated the efforts of the Parkland students who have relentlessly pursued gun control in the days after the Feb. 14 massacre.

Obama’s tribute was written for Parkland students Cameron Kasky, Jaclyn Corin, David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez, and Alex Wind — all of whom are gun control activists.

His essay did not include commentary on any efforts made by pro-gun survivors or outspoken conservative students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas.

“This time, something different is happening,” Obama wrote of the Parkland students’ efforts. “This time, our children are calling us to account.”

He also lauded the activist efforts of the “Dreamers” and of those furthering the Black Lives Matter movement.

“This generation — of Parkland, of Dreamers, of Black Lives Matter — embraces that duty,” Obama wrote. “If they make their elders uncomfortable, that’s how it should be.”

Obama even took aim at the National Rifle Association in the essay.

“The NRA’s favored candidates are starting to fear they might lose,” he wrote, but warned that “NRA scare tactics” would likely still be employed.

What’s Kashuv saying now?

After the mass killing, Kashuv, 16, spent copious amounts of time in Washington, D.C., lobbying for school security legislation.

Congress later passed the STOP School Violence Act, an act that funds mental health programs and resources as well as programs for infrastructure safety.

After Time published Obama’s essay, Kashuv — in a reportedly now-deleted tweet — pointed to the fact that no pro-gun or conservative students were mentioned, and called it a “disgrace.”

The 16-year-old also said that the former president was wrong when he lauded gun control student activists for “persuading statehouses and some of the biggest gun retailers to change.”

On Twitter, Kashuv wrote, “This is so rich coming from @BarackObama.”

He later added, “It’s an absolute shame that @BarackObama gives no credit to @rpetty and @AndrewPollackFL who actually got the legislation passed. ‘Already, they’ve [the Parkland students] had some success persuading statehouses and some of the biggest gun retailers to change.’”

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

What McCabe Threatened To Do If He Got Busted Bodes VERY BADLY For Clinton AND Obama

It’s going down! ………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. …………………… ………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. …………………… Following former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s termination last […]

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Zuckerberg’s Investor Group Pushes for Pre-Election Amnesty

Silicon Valley investors, including Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg, are joining the Koch network’s push for a quick amnesty that would also keep the issue of cheap-labor immigration out of the November election.

But the push by Zuckerberg’s FWD.us investor group quickly hit a roadblock Thursday when Majority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy denounced the “discharge petition” amnesty plan, which is fronted by California GOP Rep. Jeff Denham.

“I don’t believe discharge petitions are the way to legislate,” McCarthy said to The Hill. “I don’t believe members in the [GOP] conference believe that, either.”

McCarthy’s opposition — and the growing pressure for a quick exit by retiring House Speaker Paul Ryan — opens up room for GOP legislators to make the November election all about rising wages vs. cheap-labor immigration. Numerous polls show that more than 70 percent of Americans want companies to hire Americans before importing more cheap-labor immigrants, and numerous business groups say they need more imported labor as wages begin to rise.

But a quick Zuckerberg amnesty would prevent President Donald Trump or GOP leaders from running on an immigration reform platform in November — and would also deflate economic pressure that is delivering higher wages before the 2018 election. “It would be the dumbest thing possible for Republicans to do coming election which they already think they may lose — they would for sure lose with this,” said Rosemary Jenks, the director of governmental affairs at NumbersUSA. She continued: 

I don’t think they will [shift to immigration, but] … it would be a surefire way to keep the majority. People in Washington talk about [election-winning] ’70 percent issues’ … [and] this is it, this is the 70 percent issue.

Backed by Zuckerberg’s FWD.us, Denham is collecting GOP signatures for a resolution that would urge a so-called “Queen of the Hill” debate on the House floor. In that very rare form of debate, legislators could debate several alternative immigration bills, and the most popular proposal would be sent to the Senate

Those rules would almost guarantee a big win for Zuckerberg and his allies because nearly all Democrats and many business-first Republicans — including many who are retiring this year — will support a no-strings “Clean Dream Act” amnesty for at least 1.8 million younger ‘DACA’ illegals.

Denham claims to have 50 GOP legislators backing his resolution, but those GOP members have not signed the needed “discharge petition” which allows 218 cooperating legislators to force the debate despite opposition from the Speaker of the House. Many of Denham’s supporters don’t recognize the impact of Denham’s plan, said Jenks, and “when they find out, they are not going to be happy and will certainly not sign the discharge.”’

Denham’s office did not respond to questions from Breitbart News.

McCarthy’s quick opposition to Denham’s push is critical because he is the likely replacement for exiting House Speaker Paul Ryan. Without McCarthy’s support for the immigration push, few of the GOP legislators on Denham’s resolution will sign the needed discharge petition — even though many will use their support for the resolution to ingratiate themselves with their donors and pro-amnesty voters.

Denham’s resolution is getting expensive media support from the various donors who are working under cover of the Koch advocacy network, which has at least 550 business donors. On April 17. Daniel Garza, the president of the Koch-funded LIBRE Initiative, told Business Insider:

The American people deserve a government that is effective and efficient in solving our nation’s problems.

Congress and the White House have spent a lot of time talking about DACA, but today our elected officials have yet to approve a permanent legislative solution. The Dreamers are among our best and brightest. They are students, workers, and men and women risking their lives in the Armed Forces. Washington must come together and approve a bipartisan solution that provides certainty for Dreamers and security improvements along our border.

Zuckerberg’s FWD.us advocacy group is also providing direct support for the Denham push, and it touted Wednesday’s press conference where Denham was flanked by a few other cheap-labor Republicans — Texas Rep. Will Hurd, Colorado Rep. Mike Coffman and California Rep. David Valadao – as well as the Democratic head of the Hispanic ethnic lobby, new Mexico Democrat Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham.

Zuckerberg’s FWD.us group was founded a by a slew of information-technology investors who gain from cheap white-collar labor.

The group has endorsed multiple bills and amnesties which would raise the supply of white-collar labor and also block Donald Trump’s populist “Buy American, Hire American” policies, all of which will tend to raise Americans’ blue-collar wages and white-collar salaries. In February, FWD.us joined with many other business groups to help the Senate block Trump’s popular immigration reforms.

Since Trump’s election, the FWD.us group has used the relatively few college-grad ‘DACA’ illegals to shift the political focus from Trump’s very popular wages-for-Americans pitch. That diversionary tactic has worked, partly because most establishment reporters prefer to focus on the concerns of foreign migrants rather than the concerns of fellow Americans.

However, Republicans are facing a tough 2018 election and may decide to pick up the issue up the popular issue of immigration and wages, especially if McCarthy replaces House Speaker Paul Ryan before the election.

That shift to wages and immigration is made likelier by the spreading benefits of Trump’s anti-amnesty policies which is delivering higher wages and overtime to many employees, including black bakers in Chicago, Latino restaurant workers in Monterey, Calif., disabled people in Missouri, high-schoolers, the construction industry, Superbowl workers, the garment industry, and workers employed at small businesses.

Higher wages are strongly resisted by business groups, partly because they threaten to lower investors’ returns and stock values on Wall Street, including the founders of FWD.us.

Zuckerberg’s group has funded polls which tout the supposed popularity of immigration. These “Nation of Immigrants” polls pressure Americans to say they welcome migrants.

In contrast, polls which ask people to pick a priority, or to decide which options are fair, show that voters in the polling booth put a high priority on helping their families and fellow nationals get decent jobs in a high-tech, high-immigrationlow-wage economy.

Also, a series of 2018 polls and surveys show that GOP voters believe the immigration issue is far more important than celebrating tax cuts.

Four million Americans turn 18 each year and begin looking for good jobs in the free market. But the federal government inflates the supply of new labor by annually accepting roughly 1.1 million new legal immigrants, by providing work-permits to roughly 3 million resident foreigners, and by doing little to block the employment of roughly 8 million illegal immigrants.

The Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via mass-immigration shifts wealth from young people towards older people, it floods the market with foreign laborspikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.

 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Planned Parenthood spearheads coalition dumping $30 million into liberal midterm campaigns

Planned Parenthood spearheads coalition dumping $30 million into liberal midterm campaigns
Poor, poor, underfunded Planned Parenthood. If you believe their propaganda, they desperately need federal cash, so they can perform all those “not abortion” services they provide. Why, eliminating their access to taxpayer money is cruel, probably murderous, and possibly even illegal.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Obama Praises Black Lives Matter…

Barack Obama via TIME:

…Our history is defined by the youthful push to make America more just, more compassionate, more equal under the law. This generation—of Parkland, of Dreamers, of Black Lives Matter—embraces that duty. If they make their elders uncomfortable, that’s how it should be. Our kids now show us what we’ve told them America is all about, even if we haven’t always believed it ourselves: that our future isn’t written for us, but by us.

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Epic backfire! New book details Hillary campaign’s desire to promote and ‘maximize’ Trump as the GOP nom

Epic backfire! New book details Hillary campaign’s desire to promote and ‘maximize’ Trump as the GOP nom
Every time I’ve written about the field of 2016 Republican primary candidates, I’ve made the same point.  There may have been 17 hats in the ring, but only two people ever stood a chance of beating Hillary Clinton.  They were Donald Trump and Rand Paul.  Everyone else either had mountains of baggage or lacked the necessary je ne sais quoi to make it across the finish line.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/