Lawsuit takes on University of Michigan’s ‘Bias Response Team’

A free speech legal group called Speech First filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against the University of Michigan. The lawsuit claims the university’s “Bias Response Team” is investigating and punishing constitutionally protected speech based on little more than the feelings of students who claim to be offended. From the Wall Street Journal:

‘The most important indication of bias is your own feelings,” the University of Michigan advises students. It then urges them to report on their peers, anonymously if they prefer, “and to encourage others to report if they have been the target or witness of a bias incident.”

The Bias Response Team is there, ready to investigate and mete out justice. More than 200 American campuses have established similar administrative offices to handle alleged acts of “bias” that violate no law….

Students found responsible for a “bias incident” face discipline, which ranges from training sessions to suspension or expulsion. As for what constitutes bias, that’s vague—unconstitutionally so, argues Speech First. The existence of an offended party can be sufficient to prove “bias.” The team warns potential offenders that bias “may be intentional or unintentional.” Similarly, the student code prohibits “harassment,” which it defines as “unwanted negative attention perceived as intimidating, demeaning or bothersome to an individual.” Here, subjective perception serves as evidence.

What if the expression of a controversial or unpopular opinion bothers someone? Under the University of Michigan’s rules, “the most sensitive student on campus effectively dictates the terms under which others may speak,” Speech First says. Since April 2017, students have reported more than 150 bias incidents. These include complaints about social-media posts, drawings, comments, phone calls and even “intentional item placement”—whatever that means. The Bias Response Team has also investigated speech or other expression even when it occurred off-campus.

So to sum this up, anonymous students are encouraged to report their peers for anything that makes them feel bad, even it was unintentional. This sounds like a recipe for disaster, one that empowers whatever campus snowflake is most eager to claim victimization. That prospect can’t help but result in students who are afraid to speak up about any issue on which they might hold an unapproved thought. Indeed, Speech First is arguing a chilling of free speech has already taken hold on campus:

In light of these policies, Speech First members enrolled at Michigan have abstained from speaking on topics including immigration, identity politics, and abortion because they fear their speech will be anonymously reported as offensive, biased, and/or hateful to university authorities through the bias response system. The complaint alleges that these hopelessly vague policies chill student speech and expression – a clear First Amendment violation…

“Speech codes like Michigan’s flagrantly violate the First Amendment,” said Speech First President Nicole Neily. “Moreover, a bias response system has no place in America, much less on a modern-day college campus. Because it’s impossible to know what comments might be ‘perceived’ by others as offensive, students don’t contribute to conversations and debates, ask questions, write papers, or invite speakers they might otherwise. This is not a real educational experience, and Michigan students deserve better.”

If the lawsuit is successful, it could become a model for similar suits against other schools that have set up bias response teams. Just to give you an idea who some of these students are, last October a group of them attempted to “no-platform” invited speaker Charles Murray. One person shouting over the rest claimed Murray was “killing us” and compared his speech to “ethnic cleansing.” I wonder if this event was reported to the Bias Response Team for investigation.

The post Lawsuit takes on University of Michigan’s ‘Bias Response Team’ appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Trump Buries Obama Rules: Every Illegal Caught Crossing Border Will Be Charged

A key campaign pledge of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump was to enforce immigration laws and secure the border with a wall. Although President Trump has faced obstruction in building that promised wall, his administration is cracking down on illegal immigration nonetheless.

The Washington Times reported on a major immigration enforcement policy announcement Monday from Attorney General Jeff Sessions and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement head Thomas Homan near the border in San Diego.

The new policy, which is significantly stricter than that of the Obama administration, is that any and all illegal immigrants caught crossing the border illicitly will be charged with illegally entering the country, and parents who bring children across with them could face additional charges of human smuggling. The parents will also be detained — separate from their children — while awaiting a hearing on the charges.

Previously, individuals caught crossing the border were given a deportation hearing date in civil court and released, upon which they typically disappeared into the country and rarely showed up for their court date to eventually be deported. But that has now changed.

“Our goal is to have the whole world know this border is not open. Don’t come unlawfully,” Sessions said.

Illegal entry into the country is a misdemeanor crime punishable by up to six months in jail, and illegal entry after a prior deportation is a felony that can net two years in prison. If major criminal charges were the reason for that prior deportation, the prison sentence can be up to 10 years.

Illegal immigrant advocates immediately cried foul at the tougher enforcement policies, particularly in regard to the separation of parents from children.

Will this tough new policy discourage illegal immigration?

Angelica Salas, executive director for the Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights, went so far as to call this move “by far the most wicked and cruel” action taken by the Trump administration.

“The capricious and ruthless nature of this administration’s immigration policy against undocumented and lawful immigrants is clearly visible when even the most vulnerable of the vulnerable — children — become targets,” Salas told the Times. “This policy is nothing more than red meat to an insatiable anti-immigrant base.”

But for all of the outraged howling over illegal immigrant parents being separated from their children when found in violation of the law, liberals rarely utter a peep when American citizens who violate other laws are separated from their own children when sent to jail, a hypocritcal duality pointed out by acting ICE director Homan.

He said blame for the separation of parents and children at the border fell on the parents themselves who tested the system and failed. Homan said he saw no reason why they should be treated any differently than any other parent charged or convicted of other crimes.

This crackdown on enforcement will undoubtedly lead to larger caseloads for already backlogged immigration judges and federal prosecutors, but Border Patrol agents will likely be pleased their enforcement efforts will finally be backed up by serious consequences.

RELATED: Leftist Legal Scholar: Kerry Clearly Violated Logan Act by Interfering in Iran

Indeed, under the prior catch-and-release policies, it was not at all uncommon for illegal immigrants to cross the border, get caught, get deported and then cross again, with many individuals racking up multiple — even dozens in some cases — deportations on their records.

Border Patrol agents and border security experts believe this new policy of charges backed by detention will serve to discourage illegal immigrants from attempting to illicitly cross the border in the first place, much less a second time after deportation, since they know they will face real consequences for their actions.

Trump has not given up on his promise to secure the nation with a wall along the southern border, and will continue to wrangle with Congress to secure the necessary funding to fully construct that vital security measure.

In the meantime, his administration has sent a loud and clear message to the entire world that illegally crossing the once-open border will not be tolerated, and those who are caught doing so will finally pay a real price for their criminal actions.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

GOP Candidate Bassilian Discovers US Center for Disease Control Diverted $3 Million to Liberal Group for Democrat Campaigns

GOP Candidate Bassilian Discovers US Center for Disease Control Diverted $3 Million to Liberal Group for Democrat Campaigns

Ron Bassilian is running for California’s 37th Congressional district as a Republican in 2018.

Bassilian has been employed in the IT world mostly working on Exchange, Microsoft’s enterprise e-mail solution.

Recently, Ron Bassilian discovered the US Center for Disease Control was diverting taxpayer dollars, at least $3 million, to a local liberal group to far left campaigns.


Rep. Karen Bass (D-CA) hands over a $3 million CDC check to Community Coalition.

Ron Bassilian reported this earlier this week:

A friend of mine had a similar college life to me, he went on to do political advocacy and I went on to the private sector.  So imagine my pleasant surprise when we find each other on Facebook a couple years ago, and I found out he gets a large check to start his Community Coalition center in South Central Los Angeles.  My memory recalls it at $750,000.

That must be nice, I thought, getting paid to be advocate for poor people.  So I kept tabs on this group, Community Coalition.  And the longer I kept tabs on it, the less I liked what I saw.

I’ve talked about how March for our Lives was a thinly veiled Democrat campaign – follow the money to the DNC, and follow the words to see they really want to smear the NRA and GOP.  Well, here they are funding kids to go speak there.

Check out their other campaigns.  Black Lives Matter, huge settlements for schools, you name it.

Now, why do I say this?  Well, I was trying to look up the donation my friend was bragging about.  Turns out either I was wrong or that wasn’t all.  This organization got a $3 million check from the CDC – a government organization – for “tackling health issues.”  And there handing the check is Karen Bass.

Can someone please explain to me what any of these issues have to do with tackling health?…

…Let’s call this CDC grant for what it is. It’s the heyday of Obama era politics – funneling government money into organizations that just go organize and advocate for the Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party isn’t winning in California because their ideas are better, or they’re more compassionate than conservatives. It’s because they monopolized the racket.


Ron Bassilian was a lifelong Democrat until Donald Trump’s victory made him decide it was time for a switch.

Ron is running for California’s 37th Congressional district as a Republican in 2018.

Recently, Ron uncovered a

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Check out how much accused Boston city employees make while on paid leave

If you follow the news at all you’re probably familiar with the following scenario. A story hits the news cycle about a police officer, municipal worker or aide to some elected official who has been implicated in or charged with a crime or other questionable activity. You don’t want a person under such circumstances being left on the job if they’re potentially up to no good so they wind up being placed on “administrative leave” and it’s very often paid leave. But what happens after that? Some of these investigations can drag on forever, so what happens to the government employee while that’s going on?

In the city of Boston, some reporters set out to find the answer and, at least in Beantown, it’s probably not a very good one from the taxpayer’s point of view. As they discovered, some of these accused individuals remain in this administrative no man’s land for months or even years on end, many collecting full benefits and generous salaries the entire time. We begin with the story of former Boston police lieutenant John Earley who, back in 2015, allegedly left a pub one night, jumped in his pickup truck and crashed into a backhoe that was cleaning up snow from the streets. He was then accused of fleeing the scene. The department brought charges against him and placed him on paid administrative leave. Guess what happened next. (CBS Boston, emphasis added)

In June 2016, a Boston judge dismissed the case, ruling prosecutors had not proven Earley was behind the wheel of his vehicle that night. However, BPD’s internal affairs investigation into the veteran cop continued. In July 2017, the department fired Earley.

By that time, he’d collected checks while staying at home for almost 900 days, earning more than $355,000 during his stint on paid administrative leave.

That was the highest amount received by a City of Boston employee over the past three years, according to records the WBZ I-Team obtained.

Earley was far from the only recipient of such taxpayer largess in this report. Two of Boston Mayor Marty Walsh’s top aides were under investigation as part of a federal extortion case and remained on paid leave for two years. They collected $410K during that extended vacation. There are many more examples, but the report found that the average duration of a municipal employee on paid administrative leave was nine months and the average compensation they received during that time was $72K. In just the past three years, Boston taxpayers have shelled out five million dollars for paid administrative leave.

If you don’t happen to have a government job, you’re probably wondering how this happens. In the private sector, if you’re under investigation for something awful and it’s a source of embarrassment to your employer, you will likely be unemployed in short order and hoping you qualify for unemployment. But these city workers have powerful unions with rigid contracts making it almost impossible to fire them or even put them on unpaid leave.

Boston Police Commissioner William Evans was asked about the situation and if he thought it should be this way. He claims he doesn’t like it more than anyone else, but what’s a civil servant to do?

Evans also said police officers have due process rights spelled out by collective bargaining agreements and civil service rules. Only when officers are criminally indicted can they be placed on unpaid leave.

“I think we are doing a good job policing our officers and are not afraid to bring them to court,” Evans expressed. “We are not brooming these cases. Do I wish it went quicker? Yeah, I wish there was a better way.”

When asked if the lengthy paid leave stints are just something taxpayers have to accept, Evans responded, “No, I’m not saying accept it because we can always improve and we’ll look to improve.”

He wishes there were a better way. May I humbly offer a suggestion? Get a representative of the taxpayers at the table when the public unions are negotiating these contracts rather than just the politicians who accept huge donations from their unions. You might be shocked at the results.

The post Check out how much accused Boston city employees make while on paid leave appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Maybe Schneiderman Needs Self Control, Not Gun Control

Maybe Schneiderman Needs Self Control, Not Gun Control
BELLEVUE, WA – Allegations about physical violence against women that prompted anti-gun New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to resign late Monday once again suggest a double standard exercised by those who want to “control other people and their firearms, but apparently can’t control themselves,” the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

WATCH: DHS Secretary Gives Democrat Senator A Lesson On Following The Law

On Tuesday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen gave an education to a Democrat Senator on following the law during a congressional hearing on illegal immigration.
Sen. Patty Murray (WA) asked Nielsen if her department is considering methods other than detention to handle immigrants that illegally enter the United States.
"I just want to say again, if you cross in between the ports of entry…" Nielsen began to explain.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Ex-CIA Officer: Brennan’s Attacks On Trump ‘Cringe-Worthy,’ Helps Russia, Put National Security At Risk

Via Washington Times:

A behind-the-scenes U.S. intelligence community fight over the merits of publicly scorning President Trump has burst into the open recently, with the CIA’s former Moscow station chief accusing Obama-era spymaster John O. Brennan of crossing a red line through incessant Twitter and cable news excoriations of the current commander in chief.

In addition to claiming that Mr. Brennan is aiding a Kremlin plot to deepen America’s partisan divide, former CIA Clandestine Service Officer Daniel Hoffman says the former CIA director has actually jeopardized national security by publicly insinuating that Russian President Vladimir Putin may be blackmailing Mr. Trump.

Mr. Brennan made the insinuation in late-March when he asserted during an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that Mr. Trump is “afraid of the president of Russia” and that “one can speculate as to why.”

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

White House Sources: John Kerry’s Stealth Lobbying Backfired, Helped Kill The Iran Deal

Lurch blew it big time.

Via Daily Caller:

News of former Secretary of State John Kerry’s alleged collusion with the Iranian government played a role in President Donald Trump’s final decision to scuttle the Iran deal, two White House sources with direct knowledge of the president’s thinking tell The Daily Caller.

Trump announced he was pulling out of the deal Tuesday, just a few days after news broke that Kerry had been parlaying with Iran in an attempt to keep the deal.

A source inside the White House with knowledge of the decision process tells TheDC that the Iran deal was “done” when Trump found out about Kerry’s lobbying behind the scenes to keep the agreement in place. “Trump was headed that way but Kerry just took away any of the teeth of the detractors,” the source said on background. “[Kerry’s] bulls**t ultimately killed the deal.”

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Former Planned Parenthood President: Conservatives ‘More Willing to Lie, Cheat, Steal, Deceive, Break the Law’ than Progressives

Former Planned Parenthood President: Conservatives ‘More Willing to Lie, Cheat, Steal, Deceive, Break the Law’ than Progressives



Former Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards said in an interview published this week that she thinks conservatives have an “advantage” because they are “so much more willing to lie, cheat, steal, deceive, break the law — tactics that frankly we don’t use in the progressive community.”

The Department of Justice confirmed in December that Planned Parenthood is under federal investigation in the wake of allegations the abortion chain harvests the body parts of aborted babies to sell for a profit.

In an interview with Salon, Amanda Marcotte asked Richards why she believes “nonprofits like Planned Parenthood” have experienced an “escalation of … attacks.”

Left-wing media often portrays Planned Parenthood as a “nonprofit,” even though the group profits extensively from abortions. Planned Parenthood’s 2016-2017 annual report shows the organization boosted its profits by $21 million, or 27 percent, from the previous year, all the while it took in nearly $544 million in taxpayer funding for its “nonprofit” non-abortion services, many of which are in decline.

Richards responded:

I don’t exactly know what accounts for it. Obviously, there were a couple of groups that specialize in this. I think that one of the things that I see on the right is they are so much more willing to lie, cheat, steal, deceive, break the law — tactics that frankly we don’t use in the progressive community. I do think that they have that advantage. The other is, they’ve got a lot of money. People who really probably could care less about the issue, but have complete focus on undermining any progressive institution that has either capacity or political power.

Richards is making the rounds on talk shows and in interviews to promote her book, Make Trouble.

During the interview, Marcotte said to her:

You write in the book that Planned Parenthood was dealing with fake news before that term even became famous. You were subject to a series of hoaxes, falsely accusing the organization of all sorts of terrible things, including that you sell baby parts. You were called in front of Congress to defend yourself against these ridiculous hoaxes. What is your advice to the rest of us in the age of Trump, when lying and hoaxes unfortunately becoming normal in politics?

“Yeah. Look it’s a big problem,” Richards replied. “I wish I had the magic solution. And I will say that because in many ways, Planned Parenthood was up first, we have worked with so many other organizations who’ve also been targets of these kinds of fake news attacks and undercover videos.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

***Live Updates*** MAGA Candidates Center Stage in WV, IN, OH, NC Primaries

Key GOP primary races will take place tonight in West Virginia, Indiana, Ohio, and North Carolina that will feature plenty of “MAGA” candidates, reflecting how much President Donald Trump and his economic nationalist message have taken over the GOP.

Breitbart News Washington Editor Matt Boyle has a preview of the important contests in the four states that Trump carried in 2016.

In West Virginia, controversial candidate Don Blankenship may have a slight lead in the polls against  West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey and former Democrat Rep. Evan Jenkins (R-WV). Trump has urged voters to vote for either Jenkins or Morrissey to not allow Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) to keep his seat. But as Boyle pointed out, Morrissey would most likely be well ahead of Blankenship had Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and his allies had not thrown their support behind Jenkins. As Boyle noted, Jenkins did not switch his party affiliation until after Obama’s first term and supported Hillary Clinton for president in 2008. The race has dominated headlines as the media are priming to make Republicans answer for Blankenship should he win.

In Indiana, the three candidates running to challenge vulnerable Democrat Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) in the fall have embraced Trump in what has been a nasty three-way scrum. Reps. Luke Messer (R-IN) and Todd Rokita (R-IN) are longtime rivals while businessman Mike Braun is the third candidate.

In Ohio’s GOP gubernatorial primary,  Mary Taylor battles former Senator Mike DeWine. In Ohio’s GOP Senate primary, Trump has backed Rep. Jim Renacci (R-OH) against Mike Gibbons.

Polls close at 7:30 p.m. eastern time in West Virginia, North Carolina, and Ohio. In Indiana, polls will close at 6 p.m. central time and eastern time.

Stay tuned to Breitbart News throughout the evening for live updates of all of the most important races. All times eastern.

6:45 PM: May say something about Mike Braun.

6:36 PM: Ohio Lieutenant Governor Mary Taylor looks for an upset tonight:

6:35 PM: Don Blankenship, who has been blasting McConnell’s “China family” while Blankenship reportedly considering becoming a Chinese citizen in the 1990s, has been angry after Trump asked West Virginians not to vote for him. He told CNN that Trump “will learn a lesson” if he wins and threatened to challenge Trump in a primary if Trump gets in his way.

Blankenship has been telling voters that he is “Trumpier than Trump” even though he has not been talking about economic nationalism for twenty years like Trump had before he decided to run for the presidency.

“He will learn a lesson if I win,” Blankenship reportedly told CNN today. “You shouldn’t blindly go out and endorse or cast doubts or favoritism on anybody unless you actually look at their record and not depend on the people who are running the swamp you are trying to drain.”

According to an interview he did with the New Yorker of all outlets:

We exchanged business cards. He told me to hold on to his for when he’s President. “If Trump gets in my way, I’ll just run against him,” he said.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com