NYC’s Corrupt Mayor De Blasio To Withhold Money From Museums If They’re Not “Diverse” Enough

NYC’s Corrupt Maybe De Blasio To Withhold Money From Museums If They’re Not “Diverse” Enough

When De Blasio and his clownish associates’ arent beating women, smoking weed, and illegally carrying weapons,  they’re generating some of the nation’s absolute worst policy.

This time, De Blasio is proposing the city base museum funding on how brown for female their board members are Rather than awarding funding based on the quality of work, or curation. A staggeringly racist and archaic move that will no doubt harm the arts in a city known for them, has called the Orwellian policy his “cultural plan” for New York.

More via New York Times:

Asked to explain the city’s new, tougher stance on diversity, Mr. Finkelpearl said in an email on Wednesday: “Today’s announcement requiring diversity reporting from city-funded groups is the next step, building on everything we’ve learned to date to work toward a cultural sector that is fairer, more equitable and looks like the city it serves.” […]

Several board leaders of major museums did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Yet some city officials were quick to go on the offensive against any potential opposition.

“There are people who will resist, who will resent, who will obstruct,” said Melissa Mark-Viverito, the City Council speaker. “Any moment for equality and inclusion doesn’t come easily.” […]

Diversity was emphasized throughout the cultural plan. A study conducted by the Cultural Affairs Department last year found that 67 percent of city residents identify as members of minorities, yet only 38 percent of employees at cultural organizations belong to those groups.

Ben Shapiro, at the Daily Wire, wrote a piece today condemning the “cultural plan”, saying “The totalitarianism of the Left won’t stop at crackdowns on political viewpoints (Governor Andrew Cuomo famously said conservatives weren’t welcome in his state). It extends to art, too. Mao had his cultural revolution, and Maoist-lite De Blasio will have his as well.”

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

NY Congressman Unloads on ‘Disgraceful’ Jets CEO Helping Players Ignore Anthem Rules

NFL execs are still in the firing line.

A New York congressman with a reputation as a straight shooter took a bead on New York Jets chairman and acting owner Christopher Johnson on Saturday with a Twitter post that nailed Johnson’s attempt to play both sides in the ongoing dispute over players protesting during the national anthem.

And he hit the target dead center.

Republican Rep. Peter King was responding to Johnson’s comments after the league announced its new policy Wednesday requiring players who are on the field to stand respectfully for “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

Under the policy, teams would be fined if their players or other employees engage in protests during the song, according to ESPN.

On Wednesday, Johnson told Newsday he would not pass any team fines on to individual players.

“I never want to put restrictions on the speech of our players. Do I prefer that they stand? Of course. But I understand if they felt the need to protest,” he told the newspaper. “There will be no club fines or suspensions or any sort of repercussions. If the team gets fined, that’s just something I’ll have to bear.”

In a Twitter post, King called the remarks “disgraceful.”

“Disgraceful that @nyjets owner will pay fines for players who kneel for National Anthem,” King wrote. “Encouraging a movement premised on lies vs. police. Would he support all player protests? Would he pay fines of players giving Nazi salutes or spew racism? It’s time to say goodbye to Jets!”

King, who is no stranger to controversy, has a habit of telling liberals exactly what they don’t want to hear. That much was clear from the Twitter responses, which were overwhelmingly from the liberal side (and written with as much intelligence as you’d expect from that quarter.)

And on this one, he was exactly right.

Does the NFL’s new anthem policy go far enough for you?

The anthem controversy has been a disaster for the NFL since San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick decided to kick it off by sitting and pouting during the 49ers pre-season games in 2016.

The league’s ratings dropped throughout the 2016 and 2017 seasons, costing networks that carry the games billions of dollars.

RELATED: Claim: NFL Discriminated Against Cheerleader Because She’s a Christian

The American public was disgusted by the sight of mega-millionaires protesting the country that made them wealthy by kneeling on the field before games most Americans can’t afford to attend themselves.

Now, the owners are trying rectify the situation by ordering players on the field to stand respectfully for the anthem, and allowing those who can’t bring themselves to do even that to stay in the locker room for the duration of a song beloved by hundreds of millions of their compatriots.

Johnson told Newsday he only supported the league’s new policy because it fined the teams, not individual players for protests, which gave him the chance to pay for any misbehavior.

Maybe that’s true, but since no Jets took a knee during the controversy last season, according to Newsday, it’s a good chance that Johnson is getting a chance to make himself look like a liberal hero without facing the consequence of paying any real actual money for his national profile in courage.

Instead he gets to show off as a supporter of his players and play a hero to American liberals — and all he has to do is make a pretense of supporting what King rightfully called “a movement premised on lies vs. police.”

Does racism exist in the United States? Of course it does, in many ways — including the kind of racism that paints anyone with white skin as an “oppressor.”

But the “oppression” the NFL players are pretending to protest grew directly out of the whole “hands up, don’t shoot” movement — and even a Washington Post editorial board member admitted “hands up, don’t shoot” was a lie.

King was right. The anthem protests were bad. And the weaselly reactions of owners like Johnson are “disgraceful.”

They’re the kind of arrogantly empty actions that are keeping NFL execs in the firing line. Until they man up and get some courage, it’s where they belong.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Anthony Scaramucci Blasts Democrats for Supporting MS-13, Hamas, and ‘Chairman Kim’

Anthony Scaramucci Blasts Democrats for Supporting MS-13, Hamas, and ‘Chairman Kim’

Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci blasted the Democratic Party on Friday for supporting MS-13, Hamas, and Kim Jong Un.

Appearing on ‘Fox & Friends’ to discuss the canceled summit with Kim Jong Un and the ‘spygate’ allegations, Scaramucci blasted the Dems for who they are willing to align with in order to bash President Donald Trump.

“It’s got to be enormously frustrating for the president, because he’s a businessperson and a negotiator, and he’s playing it very straight, and they’re spinning it that way. And if you look at the politicians that were just interviewed, it’s all the same sort of nonsense,” Scaramucci began. “So, at the end of the day, he’s got a deal on the table that he will accept for the American people. If that does not work, then there’ll be no deal, it’s just really that simple. And that sort of bluntness and that steely backbone is something that these guys don’t like, which I find very ironic. It’s almost like they’re supporting — like [inaudible] said, they support MS-13, Hamas and now they’re supporting the Chairman Kim.”

Fox and Friends co-host Steve Doocy responded that those who are against the president did not want him to make the deal.

“No they don’t, because they don’t want him –” Scaramucci began to reply.

“To get a win,” Doocy said, finishing the former communication director’s thought.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Palestinian Authority Daily: ‘Moron’ Trump ‘Needs Rehabilitation In A Mental Hospital’ for Moving Embassy

TEL AVIV – The official Palestinian Authority daily is continuing its crusade against the U.S. by publishing a slew of low blows directed at “stupid, moronic” President Donald Trump, a man who “needs rehabilitation in a mental hospital” for his “war crime” of moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem on behalf of “a gang of Zionist robbers.”

An oped published last week in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida and translated by Israeli watchdog Palestinian Media Watch described the officials attending the opening of the U.S. embassy in “occupied Jerusalem” as “partners in a war crime.” The writer referred to the embassy as “an American military base.”

A cartoon published in the paper depicted the embassy as a bomb. Alongside images of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Dome of the Rock in the Old City of Jerusalem was the new U.S. embassy in the shape of an enormous hand grenade.

In another oped published that day, the embassy was described as an “outpost” that needed to be “uprooted.” The writer further said that the decision caused the U.S. to move from the role of broker for peace to “enemy.”

“Donald Trump, who issued the ominous Jerusalem declaration … continues in his unparalleled stupidity to talk about peace. … The U.S. has no place in the Middle East peace. It has lost its position, qualification and credibility. Donald Trump, who transformed it from a mediator into an enemy, is leading the hostility,” the article said.

“This outpost that Trump has established in our Jerusalem will be uprooted and what will remain is the face of free Palestine,” it continued.

Another writer quoted by PMW referred to U.S. and Israeli officials attending the embassy opening ceremony as “a gang of Zionist robbers celebrating its theft.”

 Before I watched the Zionist ceremony establishing the American outpost in occupied Palestinian Jerusalem I was very concerned. … However, after watching I calmed down again. The reason for this is that what I saw was nothing more than a gang of Zionist robbers celebrating its theft, just like a gang of bank robbers who just finished the robbery and are now happy with what they stole, laughing hysterically and not believing that they now have millions in their possession!

What confirms this impression — that this is the celebration of a Zionist gang of robbers who stole the history and land — is the almost complete international absence.

After I watched the gang of robbers I felt great relief, because what I saw was an isolated gang acting outside of the framework of time and space, outside of the framework of history and law; a gang led by Trump and [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, together with blonde model Ivanka [Trump] and her little Zionist husband [Jared] Kushner. More importantly, when the dust cleared the gang was exposed in its wretched celebration, and most importantly — Jerusalem is still preserving its Palestinian Arab identity.

Still another called for Gazans to “sprinkle your pure blood over their putrid heads … of the moron Trump and his staff.” He also referred to Trump as a “rebellious cowboy” and Israel as a “satanic Zionist plant.”

Gaza … your enemies and the robbers of the land and the homeland are vampires who are shepherded by a rebellious cowboy as history is slaughtered, the facts are turned upside down in the name of the wretched promise of the moron Trump and his staff who are obsessed with Armageddon — sprinkle your pure blood over their putrid heads that are contaminated with the conduct of capitalists, that are mired in the bog of robbing the peoples and planting the satanic Zionist plant in the inhabited home and homeland.

An article published the day after the move said Trump belongs in a “mental asylum.”

“This man needs rehabilitation in a mental hospital or to be hospitalized in an asylum, because if he remains free, the world will see how he enjoys and takes pleasure like no other while the world goes up in the flames of his sadism and naivety!”

Another writer viewed the opening of the embassy in Jerusalem and the recognition of the city as the capital of Israel as an example of the U.S. alleged track record of “abuse and bullying toward small peoples.”

The U.S. in its various administrations, has never known a thing about qualities of chivalry or empathy, tolerance and human understanding. For a long time it has abused — and is still abusing — the poor and small peoples! … The reality is that it would be hard for us to tell all the stories of “the ugly American,” which are full of blood, systematic violence and a violence of abuse and bullying toward small peoples. This is currently being expressed in a most ugly fashion by its abuse of our people. … It is going wild in its aggression towards [our people], which is being expressed by the American administration’s responsiveness to all of the Zionist activity’s demands. What is more, this administration — while transferring its embassy from Tel Aviv to occupied Jerusalem in contradiction to all the decisions of the international institutions, after it declared it the capital of the occupation state (!!) — has turned into a completely Zionist administration.

The cartoon below slammed Trump for focusing on the embassy opening ceremony and ignoring the killings of Palestinian rioters in Gaza on the same day.

The embassy move coincided with the so-called March of Return, violent riots on the border between Israel and Gaza that saw 60 Palestinians killed by Israeli fire on Monday. Hamas admitted that 50 of the 62 dead were its members. Palestinian Islamic Jihad said three others were its members.

Hamas officials have admitted that the notion of peaceful, civilian-led protests is a farce. Last week co-founder Mahmoud al-Zahhar told Al Jazeera that the term “peaceful resistance” was coined to “deceive the public.”

Women and children were called to the front lines as human shields with the promise that the Israeli “army won’t kill them.” The riots included swastika-emblazoned bomb-carrying kites, knives, Molotov cocktails, explosive devices, guns and terrorists storming the border with the express intent of “liberating Palestine.”

Gazans were also encouraged to bring their weapons to the riots, but were told it was preferable to capture Israelis rather than kill them since Israel will do anything to rescue one of their own.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Louisiana Becomes 25th State to Bar Business Ties with Companies Boycotting Israel

TEL AVIV – Louisiana on Tuesday became the 25th U.S. state to bar state government agencies from doing business with companies that are involved in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

“The United States, and by affiliation Louisiana, have benefited in innumerable ways from our deep friendship with Israel. Any effort to boycott Israel is an affront to this longstanding relationship. I am pleased that Louisiana will join what is now a critical mass of states in supporting our closest ally,” Gov. John Bel Edwards, a Democrat, said in a statement.

The order directs the state commissioner of administration to terminate existing state contracts with companies that are either currently boycotting Israel or supporting those who do. It further stipulates that future state contracts will first require parties to sign an agreement stating their compliance with the new law.

The executive order specifies BDS and says it hopes to reverse the anti-Israel movement’s aim to isolate the Jewish state. “The state of Louisiana unequivocally rejects the BDS campaign and stands firmly with Israel,” the order reads.

Edwards issued the order on the same night the Governor’s Mansion celebrated the 70th anniversary of Israel’s creation. Earlier on Tuesday, the House passed a resolution praising the anniversary.

Pro-Israel groups lauded Edwards’ move.

The Israel Project said in a statement from its CEO Josh Block:

The Israel Project is grateful to the governor for his leadership in fighting back against BDS discrimination. Advocates of BDS discrimination remain committed to their anti-Semitic agenda of isolating and demonizing the world’s only Jewish State. Its founders have openly called for Israel’s destruction and made it clear that they target Israel’s very existence, not its policies. From the North to South, in blue and red states – and with strong bipartisan support – lawmakers in 25 states have now declared BDS a form of discrimination and sent a clear signal that their states will not tolerate or condone taxpayer dollars going to subsidize anti-Israel hate.

“We are heartened that Louisiana has taken a strong stand opposing discrimination against Israel,” Roz Rothstein, CEO of StandWithUs, said. “Earlier this year, the city of New Orleans rejected an anti-Semitic resolution, and now the state has made clear that taxpayer funds should not support businesses which discriminate.”

The Jewish Federations of North America said that the move marks “a critical moment in which fifty percent of U.S. states have received the message that boycotting Israel is bad for business,” according to a statement released by the group’s Senior Vice President of Public Policy William Daroff.

“These state actions address the discriminatory nature of BDS and the ability for states to control their own commerce. We thank the governor and the many community activists who made this possible in Louisiana,” Daroff added.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Union leaders upset over Trump executive orders to weed out under-performing federal employees

President Donald Trump is making it easier to tell federal employees, “You’re fired.”

And union leaders are not happy.

What has changed?

Trump has issued three executive orders aimed at getting rid of low-performing federal employees, the White House announced Friday. The changes could save taxpayers an estimated $100 million per year, according to the announcement.

The new rules promote basing employment on merit rather than tenure. Additionally, federal agencies are encouraged to fire employees instead of suspending them. Employees will also have less time to improve their performance, according to published reports.

A White House announcement stated, “Tenured federal employees have stolen agency property, run personal businesses from work, and been arrested for using drugs during lunch breaks and not been fired.” In a statement accompanying the release, Trump said the government must “operate more efficiently and more securely.”

Under the new orders, federal workers will be expected to devote at least 75 percent of their time on direct job duties.

How did a federal employee union respond?

The American Federation of Government Employees, a union for federal workers, said that 700,000 members have denounced the reforms. Political opposition and potential litigation may result, union leaders suggested.

“We will see him in court, we will see him in the street, we will see him wherever we can be,” AFGE president J. David Cox Sr. said in a Washington Examiner report.

He called the orders “a classic example of this administration’s attack and assault on women, attack and assault on minorities.”

Cox told the Washington Examiner the new rules were “modeled after the VA Accountability Act” that recently became law, allowing for expedited firing of Veterans Administration workers.

He also said he fears the orders are a step toward making federal workers “at will” employees. That could mean taking political considerations in into account for hiring and firing decisions.

Cox said that in his opinion, “President Trump has no respect for the rule of law and this is just the latest case.”

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Publix caves to David Hogg, will suspend donations to pro-gun politician

They’re suspending all political donations temporarily while they reevaluate their policy or whatever but that’s a fig leaf to justify cutting off pro-gun gubernatorial candidate Adam Putnam, to whom Publix has donated big bucks over the years and whom Hogg and the Parkland kids want to make an example of.

If you’re a gun-rights supporter and you continue to shop there, you’re subsidizing the new policy. Gun-grabbers have every right to try to influence Publix’s political giving by damaging their bottom line. So do you.

“We would never knowingly disappoint our customers or the communities we serve,’’ said company spokesman Dwaine Stevens in a statement Friday. “As a result, we decided earlier this week to suspend corporate-funded political contributions as we reevaluate our giving processes.’’…

“At Publix, we respect the students and members of the community who have chosen to express their voices on these issues,’’ Stevens’ statement said. “We regret that our contributions have led to a divide in our community. We did not intend to put our associates and the customers they serve in the middle of a political debate.’’…

Despite Publix’s longtime support of conservative causes and candidates, it’s rare for the company to become the center of controversy, said Aubrey Jewett, a professor of political science at the University of Central Florida.

“In a serious political game of chicken, Publix blinked,” Jewett went on to say. Indeed. The impetus for this surrender was Hogg organizing a protest in the parking lot of a Publix store in Coral Springs in which he and others drew chalk outlines of bodies on the asphalt. The law on whether the First Amendment applies to parking lots in shopping centers has been iffy over the years at the federal level and among the states. The Warren Court once held that because parking lots were held open to the public, they were a de facto public forum covered by the First Amendment even though privately owned. The Burger Court later reversed that. Assuming Publix owned the land, presumably they could have had the cops come and move Hogg et al. out if they were loitering. But protesting in a large parking lot is about as non-disruptive as a demonstration on private property can be and the store manager probably assumed it wasn’t worth making a fuss about given the poor “optics” of forcible removal.

Hogg himself seemed to think he had a First Amendment right to do it, but then he would.

The protest didn’t stay outside, though. Later Hogg and his fellow demonstrators moved inside and staged a “die-in” right there in the produce aisle — leading to this surreal scene:

Hogg’s mother, who participated in the die-in, told the Orlando Sentinel that “people were stepping over her to get to their fruit.” Let no amount of theatrical wokeness stop you from getting those pineapple chunks you came for.

Anyway, can they do that? Can they just lie down on the store floor to make a political point while customers are trying to shop? Uh, no, of course not. Publix could have called PD. But the die-in lasted all of 12 minutes and Hogg has a *lot* of sympathizers in media, local and national. It’ll be many years before he annoys enough people to shed the aura of Absolute Moral Authority that he enjoys on the left right now. Publix is going to follow the path of least resistance on public relations here for as long as they can so as not to make an enemy of the Parkland crowd and their press phalanx. Don’t complain about the protesters, don’t hassle them, certainly don’t call the police on them. Just let them do their stunt, let Hogg get his adoring media coverage for the day, and wait for the Parkland organizers to have their attention diverted by another corporation guilty of wrongthink. Hogg could have pinched a loaf in the middle of the frozen foods aisle and a company spokesman would have issued a statement congratulating him on its healthy size and color.

I assume this ends with Publix agreeing to make a hefty donation to the PAC of his choice. Here’s a bit of the scene yesterday. Yes, there were gun-rights supporters there too, as you’ll see.

The post Publix caves to David Hogg, will suspend donations to pro-gun politician appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

Right-Wing Animal Rights Group Exposes USDA’s Deadly Taxpayer-Funded Tests on Kittens and is Fighting to Stop Them

Right-Wing Animal Rights Group Exposes USDA’s Deadly Taxpayer-Funded Tests on Kittens and is Fighting to Stop Them

A new investigation from White Coat Waste Project has exposed that taxpayers have been funding cruel and deadly tests on kittens in a secretive U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland.

The right-wing organization is now working with Congress to stop it.

WCW prides themselves on being both animal lovers and liberty lovers. Their goal, according to their website, is to “STOP taxpayer-funded experiments on dogs, monkeys, cats and other animals, we must stop wasteful government spending. Our approach? Drain the swamp: cut federal spending that hurts animals and Americans.”

According to their new report, documents obtained by WCW through the Freedom of Information Act include their experimental protocols, animal purchase orders and photographs.

The documents reveal that a USDA Agricultural Research Service laboratory “breeds 100 kittens a year, feeds the 2-month-old kittens Toxoplasma-infected raw meat, collects their feces for 2-3 weeks to harvest the parasite for use in other experiments, and then kills, bags and incinerates the kittens like they’re trash.”

“The USDA kills all of the kittens, even though it admits that virtually all of them are healthy after the experiments. Expert authorities–including the American Veterinary Medical Association, the American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–agree that Toxoplasma-exposed cats are safe and adoptable because after just one Toxoplasma exposure, cats shed the parasite, become immune and won’t transmit to humans or other animals,” the report adds.

The USDA currently spends $650,000 of taxpayer’s money annually on the testing.

Congressman Mike Bishop (R-MI), who has been at the forefront of the efforts to end taxpayer funded animal testing, is now demanding answers. Following the release of WCW’s findings, he sent a strongly worded letter to Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue accusing the USDA of using “kittens as test tubes.”

“Put simply, it creates life to destroy life,” he added. “While I support the objective of making food safer and protecting people and animals from infectious diseases, we must ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively, efficiently and humanely.”

Bishop has now joined forces with House Agriculture Committee member Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA) to introduce a bill called the KITTEN Act to end the wasteful and cruel killing.

“I’m proud to introduce the bipartisan KITTEN Act to put a stop to USDA’s tax-funded experiments on cats and kittens. My constituents and other Americans have made it clear that they don’t want the federal government spending their hard-earned tax dollars to abuse and kill cats in cruel, inhumane and outdated experiments. The USDA must stop killing kittens, and I hope to work collaboratively with the agency towards that goal,” Bishop said in a statement about the bill.

According to a 2016 poll by Lincoln Park Strategies, 75% of US voters oppose cat experiments.

In 2018, Congress enacted legislation that cut funding for dog experiments at the VA, largely due to work done by WCW.

If you wish to support the cause or learn more about what is going on, visit USDA Stinks.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

I Spy: The Media and President Lyndon Baines….Obama?

Hmmm. President Lyndon Obama?

So finally, someone stands up to remind the media that when it comes to the FBI and CIA spying on a political opponent of a president –  America has in fact been here before.

Admittedly, it helps to have been around at the time of the Johnson-Goldwater election in 1964. Not to call attention to age, but I was an eager-beaver eighth grader from a Republican family who, wonderfully ignorant about the history of the American Left, crusaded in my own fashion for LBJ. To my parents’ eye-rolling, head-shaking resignation.  The GOP nominee, the “Mr. Conservative,” Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater, was taking all kinds of flak of a type I would later come to understand in vivid fashion. The media of the day was ripe with suggestions that the libertarian Goldwater was a racist (horrifically untrue) and, but of course, had an affection for Nazis.

Indeed, the very week Goldwater was nominated in San Francisco, CBS’s Daniel Schorr went on the air with a report that once the GOP Convention was over, Goldwater will be “starting his campaign…in…..Bavaria, center of Germany’s right wing.” Where specifically in Bavaria? Why, but of course, “Berchtesgaden, Hitler’s onetime stamping ground.” 

The story was false from beginning to end. Goldwater wasn’t going to Germany, much less to “Hitler’s onetime stamping ground.” A particularly insulting attack on a man who was not simply a senator and presidential nominee but had served as a U.S. Army Air Force pilot in World War II, later retiring with the rank of Major General.  Be that as it may, CBS had said it was so until it was clear it wasn’t. Goldwater was still fuming about this media characterization of him as some sort Nazi decades later when writing his memoirs.

But there was another story from that 1964 campaign – and it comes to mind as the media goes crazy over the Trump charge that the FBI and CIA were busy implanting spies in his campaign – “Spygate” as the branding President has named it.  None other than the redoubtable Dr. Lee Edwards, now of the Heritage Foundation but in 1964 a Goldwater staffer and later the Senator’s biographer (Goldwater: The Man Who Made a Revolution)  has stepped forward to remind – not for the first time – that in 1964 America in fact had a president who was using both the FBI and the CIA to spy on his opponent. Writing in the Wall Street Journal,  Dr. Edwards dips back into his Goldwater biography to remind in his headline:

The FBI Spied for LBJ’s Campaign
On the president’s orders, the bureau wiretapped Barry Goldwater’s plane and headquarters.

Writes Edwards:

In 1971 Robert Mardian, who had been a regional director in the Goldwater campaign, became (in the Nixon administration) assistant attorney general for internal security. During a two-hour briefing with Hoover, Mardian asked about the procedures for electronic surveillance. To Mardian’s amazement, Hoover confessed that in 1964 the FBI had wired the Goldwater campaign plane, under orders from the White House. When Mardian asked Hoover why he had complied, the director answered, “You do what the president tells you to do.”

In a later conversation with Mardian, William C. Sullivan, the bureau’s No. 2 man, verified the FBI’s spying operation against the Goldwater campaign. In a 1992 interview, Mardian told me that Sullivan was appalled at LBJ’s partisan use of the bureau.”

And also:

(President) Johnson also illegally ordered the FBI to conduct security checks of Goldwater’s Senate staff. Cartha “Deke” DeLoach, the FBI’s liaison with the White House and a top aide to Director J. Edgar Hoover, denied at a 1975 Congressional hearing that the bureau had investigated Goldwater’s staff. But through the Freedom of Information Act, I obtained copies of FBI memoranda detailing the results of the bureau’s illegal file check of 15 Senate staffers. “No derogatory information was located concerning” any of the people in Goldwater’s Senate office, stated one memo that bore DeLoach’s initials.”

Of the CIA, Edwards notes:

Former intelligence officer E. Howard Hunt, best known for his role as an orchestrator of the Watergate bugging, told a Senate committee in 1973 that his CIA superior had ordered him to infiltrate the Goldwater campaign. Hunt claimed to have questioned the order, only to be told that it had been a personal request of President Johnson and that the information he recovered would be delivered to a White House aide.

CIA Director William Colby confirmed the White House’s role in the illegal surveillance while addressing a congressional hearing in 1975. That the CIA is prohibited by law from operating within the U.S. didn’t matter to the Johnson campaign. The Goldwater people never suspected that one of them was a spy for the Democrats.”

Now. Question. Where was the liberal media in 1964 on this hot story? Answer, all too predictably, exactly nowhere. Not a peep of this made the liberal media of the day, much less did this explode into a massive scandal along the lines of what Dr. Edwards once called, quite accurately, “Johnson’s Watergate.” Why? The liberal media of the day was the only media of the day.

Be that as it may, the fact that a president would use the FBI and CIA to spy on his opponents is established. With that in mind, where is the liberal media feeding frenzy on this news from, yes, not 1964 – but today? Fox News (but of course!) has done its due diligence and headlines: 

Grassley rips Strzok-Page redactions amid mystery text: Obama ‘White House is running this’

This jewel of a story says, in part, this, bold print supplied:

A top Senate Republican is challenging the Justice Department over extensive redactions made in files showing text messages between anti-Trump FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, drew particular attention to one text that suggested the Obama ‘White House is running this,’ in reference to an unspecified investigation.

But, like in so many of the files, a name was redacted and the context was unclear, though one report suggests that was related to the Russia probe.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Grassley called for all redactions to be removed.

‘The manner in which some redactions have been used casts doubt on whether the remaining redactions are necessary and defensible,’ Grassley wrote.”

Then there was also the text from Lisa Page on September 2, 2016, which said to her lover, Strzok, that: “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” “POTUS”, of course, is the acronymn for “President of the United States.”

And the media reaction here? Ho-hum.

Here is a central fact, a fact that Dr. Edwards’ reminder raises and should raise. America has already had a president who used the FBI and the CIA to spy on his political opponent. And the media of the day had not the slightest curiosity — then or later — to investigate. No, there was no such thing as Fox news or even cable news in that time, much less talk radio and the Internet. Which makes it all the more curious — make that predictable — why the mainstream media of the day didn’t investigate LBJ’s abuse of the FBI and CIA for political purposes.

That being the case, this reminder of events from Dr. Edwards should serve as a prod for today’s media to take a hard look at these texts from the FBI’s star-crossed anti-Trump-hating lovers Strozk and Page that pose the obvious question about President Obama that was once famously asked by the late Tennessee Republican Senator Howard Baker during Watergate.

That question: “What did the President know- and when did he know it?”

One can be justifiably suspicious that the reason for all the bureaucratic foot-dragging by the Justice Department and the FBI today is nothing more than a stall, a slow-walking obstruction to get past a supposed “Blue Wave” election in which Democrats will supposedly take charge and remove the power to investigate from the Devin Nunes’ and Charles Grassleys of the House and Senate, effectively shutting the investigation of “Spygate” down.

With a compliant media cheering them on in a campaign of silence surrounding any serious investigation into a possible abuse of the FBI and CIA by the Obama White House -not at all unlike the media silence that surrounded the LBJ use of the FBI and CIA to spy on the 1964 Goldwater campaign.

President Lyndon Obama? One way or another, the American people have a right to know. And the media has an obligation to report the truth.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/