MSM Unleashes Desperate Attacks on Stephen Miller in Latest Push for Open Borders

MSM Unleashes Desperate Attacks on Stephen Miller in Latest Push for Open Borders

The mainstream media has unleashed a brand new round of attacks against White House Adviser Stephen Miller, in a last-ditch push to rally left-wing support for open borders policies.

In a coordinated round of attacks disguised as ‘reports’, the usual suspects unleashed on Stephen Miller Saturday night.

Stephen Miller has been a stalwart of tough policies to stop illegal immigration for a White House under siege by democrats, the media and pro-amnesty republicans. From comparing Stephen Miller to Hitler to ridiculing his looks, the attacks initiated on Saturday Night were without any boundaries of decency.

With 68% of Americans opposed to illegal immigration, many members of the mainstream media have resorted to saying that Trump is running “concentration camps”.

 

 

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Child Border Crossers Have Higher Standard of Living than 13M Impoverished American Children

Migrant children who cross into the United States either alone or with adults have a higher standard of living once they are put into federal care than the more than 13 million American children who are living in poverty across the country.

In Fiscal Year 2017, the federal government referred nearly 41,000 unaccompanied minor border crossers to the Unaccompanied Alien Children program which is facilitated by the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

Data provided to Breitbart News reveals that each unaccompanied minor costs the federal government about $34,660 annually. This is a higher standard of living per child than the roughly 13 million American children who continue to live below the U.S. poverty line.

In 2016, there were about 13.2 million American children under the age of 18 living in poverty. These are U.S. children, for example, whose parents or guardians –in a household of four — earn less than $24,500 a year.

This annual income for an impoverished American family is $10,000 less than the more than $34,500 in federal funds which are spent on each unaccompanied minor border crosser.

Overall, about $1.4 billion is spent on unaccompanied minor border crossers every year, which American taxpayers foot the bill for, as Breitbart News reported.

Most recently, Breitbart News‘s Senior Editor-at-Large Joel Pollak revealed the comfortable living conditions that unaccompanied minor border crossers are placed into by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Those comfortable living conditions include lodging, meals, clothing, medical care, education, recreation, counseling, among other services.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder. 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

SPLC Exposes Epidemic of Nonexistent White-on-Black Violence


And besides, says the report at great length, Roof is merely the intellectual love child of other really really bad people like William Shockey and Jared Taylor whose work includes the unanswerable — even unaskable — questions: What’s up with all this black violent crime? And why is black on white crime so wildly out of proportion?


And what would happen to the real numbers for black crime look if we eliminated witness intimidation, stitches for snitches, and the self-fulfilling prophecy of getting rid of the cradle to prison pipeline because there are too many black people in prison for no reason whatsoever? (Spoiler Alert: They would go from very very bad, to ridiculously bad.)


Any how do so many people get away with blaming all this black criminal dysfunction on other people?


The SPLC cares desperately about these questions: That is why they work so hard to make sure no one is allowed to ask them.


What a long and transparent list this is:


In Chicago, this year’s sport is riding the subway to that city’s nicest neighborhoods and attacking white people. Local news calls the hundreds of black perps “teens” and pretend there are no dots to connect.


Cops at the Second City Blog site don’t have problem saying what they see on the streets — but never in Chicago’s legacy media: Black crime is out of control and spreading.


It’s not hard to find similar violence and denial in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Brooklyn, New Orleans, and hundreds of other Chocolate Cities. And let’s not forget Des Moines (Beat Whitey Night!), Cedar Rapids, Omaha, Springfield, (Missouri or Illinois or Ohio, it does not matter), and lots of other cities in the Heartland where people used to think they were safe to the point of boredom. Not anymore.


Now they wonder what happened to their once peaceful towns. And why so many people pretend black crime is not ruining yet another city. And why they have to go along with this delusion.


As long as SPLC keeps reassuring them, news directors will keep ignoring increasingly insistent emails from more and more viewers asking the same question: How can you be in such denial, deceit, and delusion about the pattern of black crime and violence we see on your channel every night?


After muttering something about the unreliability of “anecdotal evidence” (read: news stories) of black on white crime, they return to what they do with the most enthusiasm but least amount of video: reminding people of the enormous amount of imagined white racism and white on black violence that black people must suffer every day at the hands of bigots.


It’s a long list: so long that Pulitzer prize winners and public officials across the country are now insisting that white people simply stop calling police when they see black people breaking the law. 


So long that Starbucks paid for 177,000 white employees to learn about white racism and black victimization that apparently runs rampant at that ultimate hipster haven.


News directors cannot get enough of that, the coffee or the fairy tales. Now Google, YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook also depend on the SPLC as their curator of what is real and what is not.


Yet black crime and denial continues. And if you do not know the numbers by now, there is only one reason: you don’t want to know them.


My own favorite story comes out of a Chicago courtroom: A 20-year-old California white girl was arrested at a Chicago airport for acting crazy. A day later city officials decided she was too crazy even for jail, so they released her into the biggest and baddest and blackest neighborhood of South Chicago.


No phone. No money. No nothing. Within a few hours she was raped and thrown off a seven-story building by a group of black people. She lived, barely.


Her family sued the Chicago police, saying they put her in danger by releasing her in that black neighborhood. They brought in a famous sociologist from Harvard University who introduced the surprised judge and jury and even more stunned reporters to the idea of Routine Activity Theory:  white people in black neighborhoods can expect to be routine victims of black violence.


Yes, that applies to Asians in black neighborhoods. But not black people in white neighborhoods — sorry about that, SPLC.


The judge ruled against the city and the $22.4 million settlement stands as the largest in Chicago history. In his ruling, he said the white girl would have been safer had the police taken her down and released her in the lion’s cage at the Chicago Zoo.


The ruling got little attention in Chicago, and almost none outside of it. Certainly none from the SPLC. But it was fully documented in that scintillating bestseller Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry.


That’s as good as reason as any to visit what was supposed to be one of the nicest entertainment districts in America: Country Club Plaza in Kansas City. For more than ten years, large groups of black people from nearby housing projects (ooops!) have turned this plaza into a frequent and predictable site of large-scale black mob violence and even some garden variety “give me your money” assaults and murders.


The former mayor — now Congressman Emmanuel Cleaver — talked about the riots and how he was not in favor of the increasingly popular curfew: “All that is going to do is make a lot of black kids angry,” he prophesied correctly.


Black on white crime in Kansas City is still a thing. So is blaming it on white racism. 


One of the pioneers of the “blame black crime on white racism” movement is Judge Susan Dlott out of Cincinnati. In the law game, she is revered for her early rulings that essentially outlawed racial profiling.


Race has nothing to do with crime, she said over and over. And if it does, well… it’s really all about poverty, not black on white hostility. Thanks again SPLC.


Anyway, just a few years ago, the judge and her uber-successful trial lawyer husband were enjoying the good life as Cincinnati’s most prominent liberal couple in the largest mansion in their region when several people broke in and did a bit of pistol whipping and threatening and robbing of the judge and her elderly husband.


The judge managed to escape.  And after running barefoot in the snow for two miles to reach a phone, the first thing she did was throw her ruling out the window and described her attackers as black to the 911 operator.


The second thing she did was describe her attackers as black again. All caught on video: Colin Flaherty and Judge Dlott.


No talk about poverty. Or class. Or economic desperation like something out of Les Miserables.


Her racial description helped police find a carful of black people who had just left her house.


In the end, it was just another black on white home invasion robbery, with a heap of violence tossed in for good measure. For you numbers freaks, this is a black thing, with black rates of this kind of crime exceeding whites by 5, 10, or 100 times, depending.


Throw in Asian numbers, and that disparity is multiplied by hundreds.


Now the SPLC says that is all a lie. The Biggest Lie. Doing the most damage. So please ignore the videos, the victims, the 911 calls, the witnesses, and all the rest of the relentless hardcore evidence of black on white crime, violence, denial, and hostility to the contrary. 


It’s all anecdotal. 


News directors may return to their all-white, gated communities with private police forces now. Where they and their neighbors cannot wait to open the mail they receive from America’s most successful direct-mail money grabbers.


Pedaling the greatest lie of our generation: the hoax of black victimization.


Colin Flaherty has written more about the hoax of black victimization in books, videos and articles than anyone. The SPLC says he is a very bad person — so bad that he created a climate of hate that caused Moslems to bomb the Boston Marathon. He is the author of Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry.










Much to the relief of news directors everywhere, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) released this week its long-awaited report about the Biggest Lie that the baddest people believe: The myth of black on white crime.


The real problem is white on black violence, says the SPLC in its new fairy tale called “Hate: The Biggest Lie.” And this white on black crime has been going on for a long time, doing a lot of damage, including from killers like Dylan Roof.


And besides, says the report at great length, Roof is merely the intellectual love child of other really really bad people like William Shockey and Jared Taylor whose work includes the unanswerable — even unaskable — questions: What’s up with all this black violent crime? And why is black on white crime so wildly out of proportion?


And what would happen to the real numbers for black crime look if we eliminated witness intimidation, stitches for snitches, and the self-fulfilling prophecy of getting rid of the cradle to prison pipeline because there are too many black people in prison for no reason whatsoever? (Spoiler Alert: They would go from very very bad, to ridiculously bad.)


Any how do so many people get away with blaming all this black criminal dysfunction on other people?


The SPLC cares desperately about these questions: That is why they work so hard to make sure no one is allowed to ask them.


What a long and transparent list this is:


In Chicago, this year’s sport is riding the subway to that city’s nicest neighborhoods and attacking white people. Local news calls the hundreds of black perps “teens” and pretend there are no dots to connect.


Cops at the Second City Blog site don’t have problem saying what they see on the streets — but never in Chicago’s legacy media: Black crime is out of control and spreading.


It’s not hard to find similar violence and denial in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Brooklyn, New Orleans, and hundreds of other Chocolate Cities. And let’s not forget Des Moines (Beat Whitey Night!), Cedar Rapids, Omaha, Springfield, (Missouri or Illinois or Ohio, it does not matter), and lots of other cities in the Heartland where people used to think they were safe to the point of boredom. Not anymore.


Now they wonder what happened to their once peaceful towns. And why so many people pretend black crime is not ruining yet another city. And why they have to go along with this delusion.


As long as SPLC keeps reassuring them, news directors will keep ignoring increasingly insistent emails from more and more viewers asking the same question: How can you be in such denial, deceit, and delusion about the pattern of black crime and violence we see on your channel every night?


After muttering something about the unreliability of “anecdotal evidence” (read: news stories) of black on white crime, they return to what they do with the most enthusiasm but least amount of video: reminding people of the enormous amount of imagined white racism and white on black violence that black people must suffer every day at the hands of bigots.


It’s a long list: so long that Pulitzer prize winners and public officials across the country are now insisting that white people simply stop calling police when they see black people breaking the law. 


So long that Starbucks paid for 177,000 white employees to learn about white racism and black victimization that apparently runs rampant at that ultimate hipster haven.


News directors cannot get enough of that, the coffee or the fairy tales. Now Google, YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook also depend on the SPLC as their curator of what is real and what is not.


Yet black crime and denial continues. And if you do not know the numbers by now, there is only one reason: you don’t want to know them.


My own favorite story comes out of a Chicago courtroom: A 20-year-old California white girl was arrested at a Chicago airport for acting crazy. A day later city officials decided she was too crazy even for jail, so they released her into the biggest and baddest and blackest neighborhood of South Chicago.


No phone. No money. No nothing. Within a few hours she was raped and thrown off a seven-story building by a group of black people. She lived, barely.


Her family sued the Chicago police, saying they put her in danger by releasing her in that black neighborhood. They brought in a famous sociologist from Harvard University who introduced the surprised judge and jury and even more stunned reporters to the idea of Routine Activity Theory:  white people in black neighborhoods can expect to be routine victims of black violence.


Yes, that applies to Asians in black neighborhoods. But not black people in white neighborhoods — sorry about that, SPLC.


The judge ruled against the city and the $22.4 million settlement stands as the largest in Chicago history. In his ruling, he said the white girl would have been safer had the police taken her down and released her in the lion’s cage at the Chicago Zoo.


The ruling got little attention in Chicago, and almost none outside of it. Certainly none from the SPLC. But it was fully documented in that scintillating bestseller Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry.


That’s as good as reason as any to visit what was supposed to be one of the nicest entertainment districts in America: Country Club Plaza in Kansas City. For more than ten years, large groups of black people from nearby housing projects (ooops!) have turned this plaza into a frequent and predictable site of large-scale black mob violence and even some garden variety “give me your money” assaults and murders.


The former mayor — now Congressman Emmanuel Cleaver — talked about the riots and how he was not in favor of the increasingly popular curfew: “All that is going to do is make a lot of black kids angry,” he prophesied correctly.


Black on white crime in Kansas City is still a thing. So is blaming it on white racism. 


One of the pioneers of the “blame black crime on white racism” movement is Judge Susan Dlott out of Cincinnati. In the law game, she is revered for her early rulings that essentially outlawed racial profiling.


Race has nothing to do with crime, she said over and over. And if it does, well… it’s really all about poverty, not black on white hostility. Thanks again SPLC.


Anyway, just a few years ago, the judge and her uber-successful trial lawyer husband were enjoying the good life as Cincinnati’s most prominent liberal couple in the largest mansion in their region when several people broke in and did a bit of pistol whipping and threatening and robbing of the judge and her elderly husband.


The judge managed to escape.  And after running barefoot in the snow for two miles to reach a phone, the first thing she did was throw her ruling out the window and described her attackers as black to the 911 operator.


The second thing she did was describe her attackers as black again. All caught on video: Colin Flaherty and Judge Dlott.


No talk about poverty. Or class. Or economic desperation like something out of Les Miserables.


Her racial description helped police find a carful of black people who had just left her house.


In the end, it was just another black on white home invasion robbery, with a heap of violence tossed in for good measure. For you numbers freaks, this is a black thing, with black rates of this kind of crime exceeding whites by 5, 10, or 100 times, depending.


Throw in Asian numbers, and that disparity is multiplied by hundreds.


Now the SPLC says that is all a lie. The Biggest Lie. Doing the most damage. So please ignore the videos, the victims, the 911 calls, the witnesses, and all the rest of the relentless hardcore evidence of black on white crime, violence, denial, and hostility to the contrary. 


It’s all anecdotal. 


News directors may return to their all-white, gated communities with private police forces now. Where they and their neighbors cannot wait to open the mail they receive from America’s most successful direct-mail money grabbers.


Pedaling the greatest lie of our generation: the hoax of black victimization.


Colin Flaherty has written more about the hoax of black victimization in books, videos and articles than anyone. The SPLC says he is a very bad person — so bad that he created a climate of hate that caused Moslems to bomb the Boston Marathon. He is the author of Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry.




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

Report: Obama Presidential Center in Chicago will cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars

Work related to the Obama Presidential Center, which will be located in Chicago on the city’s south side and include former President Barack Obama’s presidential library, will reportedly cost Illinois taxpayers nearly $200 million.

What are the details?

The Washington Examiner reported:

The state of Illinois has approved $224 million to pay for street and transportation projects in Chicago’s South Side neighborhood around the Obama Presidential Center site, $199 million of which will fall directly on the shoulders of Illinois taxpayers.

Gov. Bruce Rauner signed into law the legislature’s budget on June 4, which included $174 million for road work in and around Jackson Park — where the 235-foot-tall building would be located — and another $50 million to renovate an above-ground rail stop two miles away.

“Bringing the Obama Presidential Center to Chicago took leadership and vision, and we are gratified that our partners in Springfield also saw the potential for what this means for all of Illinois,” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel said, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

“The state’s $174 million investment in infrastructure improvements near the Obama Center on the South Side of Chicago is money well spent,” he added.

The Chicago City Council approved the project last month despite significant resistance from groups skeptical of the benefits the center will bring to The Windy City, in addition to groups protesting the center’s use of the famed-Jackson Park.

Public activists even filed a lawsuit in federal court last month seeking to bar the Obama Center from being built on park land, arguing the Obama Foundation pulled an “institutional bait and switch.”

The Obama Foundation originally said it would build Obama’s presidential library on the land, and vowed the National Archives would oversee the library. However, that — and the plans for the Obama Center — have evolved over the last several years. Officials now say the center will be privately managed.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Blast From The Past: Obama Administration Handed Child Migrants Over To Human Traffickers

Unaccompanied minors requiring placement in the United States.

Via NY Mag:

The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report released on Thursday.

In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America. At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death. Local law enforcement uncovered the operation last year, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.

“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers.”

As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed. But in many cases, officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Nearly 220 Texas School Districts Allow School Staff to be Armed

Nearly 220 Texas school districts allow school staff to be armed for defense of themselves and their students.

The Corpus Christi Caller-Times reports that the exact number of school districts allowing armed staff sits at 217.

At the beginning of February there were just over 170 Texas districts allowing armed staff, but that number grew as district after district responded to Parkland and other school shootings by changing policies to allow staff to defend their students.

The 217 school districts that allow armed staff represent 21 percent of Texas’s 1,023 independent school districts. That is 21 percent or just over one in five.

Texas implemented their armed staff policy in the months after the heinous December 14, 2012, Sandy Hook Elementary School attack. In that attack a man entered the school with stolen guns and spent over nine minutes shooting innocents without any armed response. The policy adopted by Texas “allows school districts to arm school employees and created an additional category of a certified peace officer known as a ‘school marshal’ who can conceal carry a handgun.” It is intended to ensure a Sandy Hook-style attacker will not find a school full of defenseless innocents if he dares to attack.

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Bottom line? Obama single-handedly ruined the FBI and the DOJ

Naturally, the political-media left that crowds out saner voices on television was quick as jackrabbits to announce that the FBI was vindicated by the I.G. report that was released on Thursday.  “Nothing to see here, move along” was their mantra.  But one only has to scroll through the list of columns posted at RealClearPolitics on Friday to grasp the abyss between the left and right re: the report.


The report contained an executive summary that said, “We found no documentary evidence of political bias.”  That means they did not find written confessions by all those Trump-hating higher-ups at the once-great law enforcement agency.  But the five-hundred-page body of the report is chock-full of extreme political anti-Trump mendacity.  Why the hundreds of texts between several like-minded agents that reek of profound bias against Trump are not documentary evidence is a mystery.



Nevertheless, it is an indisputable fact that a cabal of conspirators on the seventh floor of the FBI building, led by Comey and McCabe, along with John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (DNI), Sally Yates, and Rod Rosenstein at Justice coordinated their attempts to prevent Trump from winning the election by all manner of illegal means.  Most likely, much of this was at the bidding and with permission of Barack Obama.


Once Trump won, their focus switched to taking him out before he could be inaugurated.  They hope still to see him impeached, despite the thriving economy, low unemployment, and possible rapprochement with North Korea.


The New York Times continues to attack Trump, to accuse him of numerous crimes for which the paper’s reporters have no evidence.  Leftist voices of rage continue to defend Hillary, to claim she was not treated with sufficient deference, even as her many crimes were overlooked.  Paul Manafort was sent to jail on Friday while Hillary and this bunch of crooks at the FBI and DOJ are walking free, complaining all the while that Trump should never have been elected.


They’ve not learned a thing.  They hate Trump and every person who voted for him with the “white-hot heat of a thousand suns.”  Like deluded Marxists in every nation they inhabit, this bunch feels entitled to reign over the rest of us.  Their contempt for American voters and the law as written oozes off every page of that I.G. report.  Their excuses for their criminal behavior are pathetic.


Hollywood is on the same page as the media.  Look no farther than Robert De Niro, that empty suit who used to be an actor.  Even Piers Morgan recognizes the insanity of the celebrity left.  So isolated in their bubbles of wealth and privilege, they do not seem to realize their public, profane tantrums are insuring GOP success in November and Trump’s re-election in 2020.


This I.G. report is only half, or maybe only a third of the whole story.  Next will be Horowitz’s report on the FISA warrants, the justification of which was invented out of whole cloth by the selfsame overlords who gave Hillary a pass. These are police state operatives, reminiscent of the Soviet Union, East Germany before the wall fell, and North Korea.  They freely abused their power to surveil and spy on countless private citizens who had any connection, however flimsy, to Trump and his family. 


Mueller and his team of hired guns have nearly bankrupted many of the people they have targeted.  There is a special place in Hell for this swarm of rats.  Mueller’s past record of horrific ethical lapses should have seen him disbarred years ago; his mistakes have cost the taxpayers millions of dollars.  The same is true of several others on his hand-picked team of hit men. 


While the devious machinations of the Deep State are not new, it was the Obama administration, most likely Obama himself, who brought us to this low point, the wholesale corruption of the FBI and the DOJ leadership.  Obama surrounded himself with like-minded globalist elites who thought no laws applied to them: Susan Rice, Samantha Power, Valerie Jarrett, the Podestas, Ben Rhodes, Jonathan Gruber, and more.  Eric Holder was the most unprincipled attorney general, more even than John Mitchell, who served time in federal prison. 


We learned from the I.G. report that Obama lied when he said he learned of HRC’s private server from the media.  He knew because he, too, corresponded with her from a private email, just as Comey used a non-FBI email account.  None of these people, not one, respected our Constitution or the laws meant to govern their agencies.


This is what Obama did to America.  He virtually destroyed the FBI, the CIA, and the DOJ by turning them into weapons with which to destroy his opponents.  They learned their Stasi lessons well.  President Trump’s outsider ways are like blessed sunlight on these institutions that had been allowed to deteriorate and decay over the eight years of Obama rule.


Naturally, the political-media left that crowds out saner voices on television was quick as jackrabbits to announce that the FBI was vindicated by the I.G. report that was released on Thursday.  “Nothing to see here, move along” was their mantra.  But one only has to scroll through the list of columns posted at RealClearPolitics on Friday to grasp the abyss between the left and right re: the report.


The report contained an executive summary that said, “We found no documentary evidence of political bias.”  That means they did not find written confessions by all those Trump-hating higher-ups at the once-great law enforcement agency.  But the five-hundred-page body of the report is chock-full of extreme political anti-Trump mendacity.  Why the hundreds of texts between several like-minded agents that reek of profound bias against Trump are not documentary evidence is a mystery.



Nevertheless, it is an indisputable fact that a cabal of conspirators on the seventh floor of the FBI building, led by Comey and McCabe, along with John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (DNI), Sally Yates, and Rod Rosenstein at Justice coordinated their attempts to prevent Trump from winning the election by all manner of illegal means.  Most likely, much of this was at the bidding and with permission of Barack Obama.


Once Trump won, their focus switched to taking him out before he could be inaugurated.  They hope still to see him impeached, despite the thriving economy, low unemployment, and possible rapprochement with North Korea.


The New York Times continues to attack Trump, to accuse him of numerous crimes for which the paper’s reporters have no evidence.  Leftist voices of rage continue to defend Hillary, to claim she was not treated with sufficient deference, even as her many crimes were overlooked.  Paul Manafort was sent to jail on Friday while Hillary and this bunch of crooks at the FBI and DOJ are walking free, complaining all the while that Trump should never have been elected.


They’ve not learned a thing.  They hate Trump and every person who voted for him with the “white-hot heat of a thousand suns.”  Like deluded Marxists in every nation they inhabit, this bunch feels entitled to reign over the rest of us.  Their contempt for American voters and the law as written oozes off every page of that I.G. report.  Their excuses for their criminal behavior are pathetic.


Hollywood is on the same page as the media.  Look no farther than Robert De Niro, that empty suit who used to be an actor.  Even Piers Morgan recognizes the insanity of the celebrity left.  So isolated in their bubbles of wealth and privilege, they do not seem to realize their public, profane tantrums are insuring GOP success in November and Trump’s re-election in 2020.


This I.G. report is only half, or maybe only a third of the whole story.  Next will be Horowitz’s report on the FISA warrants, the justification of which was invented out of whole cloth by the selfsame overlords who gave Hillary a pass. These are police state operatives, reminiscent of the Soviet Union, East Germany before the wall fell, and North Korea.  They freely abused their power to surveil and spy on countless private citizens who had any connection, however flimsy, to Trump and his family. 


Mueller and his team of hired guns have nearly bankrupted many of the people they have targeted.  There is a special place in Hell for this swarm of rats.  Mueller’s past record of horrific ethical lapses should have seen him disbarred years ago; his mistakes have cost the taxpayers millions of dollars.  The same is true of several others on his hand-picked team of hit men. 


While the devious machinations of the Deep State are not new, it was the Obama administration, most likely Obama himself, who brought us to this low point, the wholesale corruption of the FBI and the DOJ leadership.  Obama surrounded himself with like-minded globalist elites who thought no laws applied to them: Susan Rice, Samantha Power, Valerie Jarrett, the Podestas, Ben Rhodes, Jonathan Gruber, and more.  Eric Holder was the most unprincipled attorney general, more even than John Mitchell, who served time in federal prison. 


We learned from the I.G. report that Obama lied when he said he learned of HRC’s private server from the media.  He knew because he, too, corresponded with her from a private email, just as Comey used a non-FBI email account.  None of these people, not one, respected our Constitution or the laws meant to govern their agencies.


This is what Obama did to America.  He virtually destroyed the FBI, the CIA, and the DOJ by turning them into weapons with which to destroy his opponents.  They learned their Stasi lessons well.  President Trump’s outsider ways are like blessed sunlight on these institutions that had been allowed to deteriorate and decay over the eight years of Obama rule.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Report: US planning ‘imminent’ withdrawal from the UN Human Rights Council. Here’s why.

In what would be a monumental decision, the United States is reportedly seeking to formally withdraw from the United Nations’ Human Rights Council.

What are the details?

According to Reuters, which broke the news, the withdrawal is “imminent.” Diplomats told Reuters the U.S. withdrawal is “not a question of if but of when.”

The news comes just days before the 47-nation body will meet together for a three-week session in Geneva.

Why would the U.S. withdraw?

Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., threatened a pull out last year over what she described as “chronic anti-Israel bias,” something the U.S. argues has been present in the council since its establishment in 2006.

“It is essential that this council address its chronic anti-Israel bias if it is to have any credibility,” she said at the time, adding the U.S. was becoming increasingly concerned the council was a waste of American time and money.

“If the Human Rights Council is going to be an organization we entrust to protect and promote human rights, it must change. If it fails to change, then we must pursue the advancement of human rights outside of the council,” Haley explained.

As Reuters noted, the council “has a permanent standing agenda item on suspected violations committed by Israel in the occupied Palestinian territories, which Washington wants removed.”

The council even voted last month to begin an investigation into deaths related to Gaza protests, accusing Israel of using excessive force to quell the Hamas-led violence.

What did U.S. officials say?

One U.S. official told Reuters: “We are still moving ahead with our engagement for the coming session.”

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Democratic Rep. Admits Child Migrant Crisis ‘Kept Very Quiet Under Obama Admin’

Whoops.

Via Daily Caller:

Democratic Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar admitted Saturday that the Obama administration attempted to cover up the child migrant crisis occurring at the Souther border.

“It was kept very quiet under the Obama Administration. There were large numbers of people coming in. The Obama administration was trying to keep this quiet,” Cuellar told CNN’s Fredricka Whitfield.

Whitfield displayed a 2014 image of migrant children held in cages at a detention center, and Cuellar said that he released similar photos of children separated from their parents.

Cuellar added that the number of children being held at the border right now is similar to the amount during the Obama administration.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

CNN, MSNBC Bury the Bombshell that FBI Got Freebies From Reporters

Of course, they don’t want people to know of that relationship. And that they may bebe bribing them for leaks. And that’s one of the reports that’s still to come.

Via Daily Caller:

CNN and MSNBC buried the inspector general report’s revelation that a number of FBI agents were receiving unauthorized free handouts, such as dinners and tickets, from reporters.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz noted in his report on the Clinton investigation, which was released Thursday, that his department found numerous instances in which FBI agents were improperly in contact with reporters and were receiving a number of free perks from their relationships. (RELATED: IG Report: FBI Agents Regularly Received Free Handouts From Journalists)

The department “identified numerous FBI employees, at all levels of the organization and with no official reason to be in contact with the media, who were nevertheless in frequent contact with reporters.”

FBI agents’ relationships with the media extended to “improperly receiving benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic social events” and could have encouraged some agents to leak information to the press, Horowitz implied in the report.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us