Our Future? Liberal Millenials Claim They Would Rather Date MS-13 Members Than Trump Supporters

You learn a lot of things doing this job. For instance, yesterday I learned you can say pretty much whatever you want about any of the Trumps and not get fired from your show, provided you’re suitably liberal. I previously thought there was a line, but nope. Thank you, Ms. Bee.

And today? I found out that some millennials would rather date MS-13 members than Donald Trump supporters.

That’s right, The Daily Caller went out on the town in Washington to find out whether or not our nation’s young people would prefer gang members or people who simply supported the president.

Not only was there a competition, it turns out MS-13 members came out ahead.

TRENDING: Watch: Kimmel Used Blackface, Mocked Black Man But Still Has ABC Show

As The Daily Caller noted, the MS-13 gang “operates by the motto of rape, control and kill. It’s one of the world’s most brutal street gangs and it’s responsible for many murders in the U.S.”

Trump made headlines by calling them “animals,” which aggrieved many liberals. However, I never thought I would see people saying they would rather date gang members than Trump supporters.

Among the reasons given? Well, one person said that Trump supporters “weren’t for them.” It makes one wonder whether they believe MS-13 is.

One of the guys who went with the MS-13 member said it wasn’t young girls’ fault that they’re Trump supporters because it’s not like women can think for themselves.

Do you think President Trump was right to call MS-13 members “animals?”

“A lot of Trump supporters were probably raised by rich white dads and people with lots and lots of money,” the guy said. “And they’re bred into being Trump supporters. I’m from Connecticut and I can tell you 80 percent of the girls in high school would say that they’re ‘Republican’ when they were in high school because their dads were rich white dads and had no idea what Republican even meant.”

So basically what you’re saying is that a) you’re a condescending rich, white liberal who b) doesn’t think that young women can make their own decision about whether or not they’re Republican because men pass on the political opinions.

That doesn’t sound terribly intersectional to me. But trust him. He’s from Connecticut.

Even the yes answers weren’t exactly convincing: “I guess a Trump supporter because I guess they stand for something,” one young woman said.

Well, MS-13 stands for something. It’s just that they stand for murdering anyone who gets in their way.

RELATED: Judge Hands Student Banned From Wearing Trump Shirt to School a Big Win

And then there was the guy who didn’t know what MS-13 was: “Could someone tell me what that is?” he asked. He ended up picking neither.

Now, granted, this isn’t exactly a scientific survey and it’s from a source that isn’t exactly unbiased. However, unless these were actors, this is beyond dispiriting. These people would literally rather be in a relationship with murderers than they would with someone who supported the president.

Thanks, millennials. You’ve now replaced Samantha Bee as the reason why I’m reaching for the Tums. Behold our future.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Millenials Answer: Would You Rather Date An MS-13 Member Or A Trump Supporter?

Full-blown TDS.

Via Daily Caller:

The Daily Caller’s Stephanie Hamill and Julia Nista recently hit the streets of Washington D.C. to ask millennials if they would rather date a Trump supporter or an MS-13 gang member.

Shockingly, the majority of respondents said they would rather date an MS-13 gang member, while some said they had never heard of MS-13 before.

MS-13 operates by the motto of rape, control and kill. It’s one of the world’s most brutal street gangs and it’s responsible for many murders in the U.S.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

After Years of Deep State Spying… James Clapper Admits No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence of Russian Collusion

After Years of Deep State Spying… James Clapper Admits No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence of Russian Collusion

Guest post by Mike LaChance at American Lookout:

Every week, the left’s narrative about Russia stealing the election for Trump gets weaker and weaker. Obama’s intelligence director James Clapper admitted recently that he still hasn’t seen any real evidence.

The Daily Caller reports:

Clapper: No ‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence Of Collusion

James Clapper, the former director of National Intelligence, said he has not seen “smoking gun” or “direct” evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.

“I saw no smoking-gun evidence of collusion before I left the government, and I still haven’t,” Clapper told Vox in an interview Thursday to promote his new book, “Facts and Fears: Hard Truths From a Life in Intelligence.” “There is a lot of circumstantial evidence and reasons to be suspicious, but no smoking gun as of yet.”

Clapper did say he was interested in the number of contacts between members of the Trump campaign and people linked to the Russian government. He wrote in “Facts and Fears” that “the dashboard warning lights were all lit.”

“I certainly wondered about [collusion] when I saw the frequency of meetings between people in the Trump campaign and people with ties to the Russian government,” said Clapper, who now works as a CNN analyst.

This entire affair was about the inability of the Democrats to admit that they lost the 2016 election.
They had to make it about something bigger to explain their embarrassing loss.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Liberals to Roseanne: Do as I Say, Not as I Do

The self-righteous indignation of liberals lining up to demonstrate how much they are against “racism” can be seen with regard to Roseanne Barr’s comment.  ABC jumped at the chance to cancel her show (just as it did with Last Man Standing), something liberals within the network were slavering over.  Whereas liberals’ indignation knows no bounds in regards to Roseanne’s joke, acting horrified, as if she had committed mass murder at a school, a peep hasn’t been heard from these same self-styled morally superior liberals to Louis Farrakhan’s deadly serious call for genocide against white people (and don’t get me started on liberals’ racism against Asians!) – or, for that matter, the simultaneous scandal involving Tommy Robinson.  Their indignation is very selective.


Nor is this the first time that a black racist, or a white communist, called for genocide against whites.  Here is a sample – and note that none of the major players – not CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, etc. – has deigned to report on these instances, much less expressed indignation:



– University of Pittsburgh professor Shanara Reid-Brinkley, speaking at the University of Wisconsin, stated that democracy was built on “anti-blackness,” and white people are the cause of all the problems in the world because they are in charge.  (Presumably, all the problems would disappear the moment blacks were all in charge.  As in Africa.  Which has no problems.) 


– Professor Gregory Jay, a lily-white professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, is calling for the complete “abolition of whiteness.”


– Carmen Goséy, the chair of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s student government, said “all white people are racist” – which in itself is a racist statement.  In this same university, one can enroll in the racist course “Problem of Whiteness,” taught by the African Cultural Studies Department’s Damon Sajnani, all at (white) taxpayers’ expense.


– Johnny Eric Williams, associate professor of sociology at Trinity College in Hartford, calls white people inhuman.  When members of Congress were shot at and wounded by a liberal, Williams wrote an article entitled “Let Them F‑‑‑‑‑‑ Die” instead of aiding the victims.  He was briefly put on leave, then Trinity College president Joanne Berger-Sweeney and Trinity dean and vice president Tom Cresswell came to his aid, embraced him, and reinstated him.


– Sunken-chested George Ciccariello-Maher, a white communist professor of politics and global studies at Philadelphia’s Drexel University, called for white genocide.  He later whined to a sympathetic CNN reporter because he had received nasty phone messages that suggested he should be the first on the white genocide list.  Ultimately, he resigned from Drexel, even though the president of the university had tried to shield him, and was instantly hired by the prestigious New York University, which is infested with Marxists.  He recently compared the American national anthem to – of course – the Nazi salute.


– At St. John’s College in Santa Fe, one racist, Maggie Reitz-Wells, working from the deadwood Office of Student Life, sent a system-wide invitation to attend an indoctrination group.  “The main topic for discussion will be an ongoing one: How do we deal with the depravity of whiteness and the brutality of masculinity?  How can we get to the root of this problem?”  White participants will be encouraged to confess their “white depravity,” as was the case during the Cultural Revolution.  When asked about this event, Assistant Dean Jan Arsenault became upset – not that this bizarre event was taking place, but that outsiders had learned of it


– Recently hired Preston Mitchum, a law professor at Georgetown University, ranted that all white people are racist and all men are sexist.  Furthermore, “I really, really, really, really, really, really hate cops.  Hate them.  The power.  The unfettered abuse.  The narcissism.  Hate, hate them.”  When he next goes on a demonstration, expect him to carry one of those signs that says “Love Trumps Hate.”


– Kevin Allred is an instructor at Montclair State University and Rutgers University who proclaimed, “There are no good white people.  There are only less bad white people.”


– Stanford University will be offering a class on how to abolish whiteness.


– Earlier this year, Portland Community College designated April as a month in which to attack white people.  It was organized by white liberals.


– According to Portland State University Professor’s Rachel Sanders’s “White Privilege” course, “whiteness” must be eliminated.  She, too, is lily-white, which makes you wonder…what is she thinking?


– Angie Wellman, associate director in the Student Life Multicultural Center at Ohio State University, led the “Interrupting Racism: Tips & Tools for White People” event, where white students were essentially insulted and asked to own up to their white shortcomings.


– A conference on Critical Race Theory hosted by Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis became an orgiastic expression of racism against whites by both blacks and white liberals.  Among other things, it was declared that the concept of intellectual diversity is “white supremacist b‑‑‑‑‑‑‑.”


– A St. Louis kindergarten-through-grade 8 school called College School, associated with Webster University, has a “Witnessing Whiteness” program, brainchild of (what else?) school director of equality and inclusion Vincent Flewellen.


– Meanwhile, the elementary schools in Edina, Minnesota are busy brainwashing children, even borrowing a page from Mao’s China by having self-criticism sessions.  An A-B-C book has some gems such as “A is for Activist.”  “F is for Feminist.”  “X is for Malcolm as in Malcolm X.”  The high school in Edina goes a step farther by having a mandatory brainwashing class to eliminate something called “white privilege.”  As usual, conservative and libertarian parents are too apathetic to do anything about it.


– Charles H.F. Davis, a black assistant professor of clinical education and chief strategy officer and director of research of the USC Race and Equity Center, has expressed his desire that whites be destroyed.  He also wrote that policies that punish student-protesters are a form of racism.


– Ekow N. Yankah, a law professor at Yeshiva University, wrote in The New York Times (of course) that he would be teaching his children to be racist towards whites.


– George Washington University, through its (what else?) Multicultural Student Services Center, held an indoctrination session against “Christian privilege,” especially white Christians.  This dovetails nicely with the anti-Christian, pro-Muslim religion rampant in universities.


– At the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, (only) white students can take part in an indoctrination experience in order to obtain a – suitable for framing – Graduate Certificate in Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion that will explain that they are scum because they are white.  And they have to pay only $486 for the experience!  Shelly Tochluk, a professor at Mount Saint Mary’s University (MSMU) in Los Angeles, is the organizer, and it is offered by the nonprofit AWARE-LA (Alliance of White Anti-Racists Everywhere).


But I ask you, what is more contemptible: that such blatant racism is voiced, that liberals applaud it, that the mainstream media keep a lid on it – or that people do nothing about it?


Image: Gustave Doré, “The Hypocrites address Dante.”










The self-righteous indignation of liberals lining up to demonstrate how much they are against “racism” can be seen with regard to Roseanne Barr’s comment.  ABC jumped at the chance to cancel her show (just as it did with Last Man Standing), something liberals within the network were slavering over.  Whereas liberals’ indignation knows no bounds in regards to Roseanne’s joke, acting horrified, as if she had committed mass murder at a school, a peep hasn’t been heard from these same self-styled morally superior liberals to Louis Farrakhan’s deadly serious call for genocide against white people (and don’t get me started on liberals’ racism against Asians!) – or, for that matter, the simultaneous scandal involving Tommy Robinson.  Their indignation is very selective.


Nor is this the first time that a black racist, or a white communist, called for genocide against whites.  Here is a sample – and note that none of the major players – not CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, etc. – has deigned to report on these instances, much less expressed indignation:


– University of Pittsburgh professor Shanara Reid-Brinkley, speaking at the University of Wisconsin, stated that democracy was built on “anti-blackness,” and white people are the cause of all the problems in the world because they are in charge.  (Presumably, all the problems would disappear the moment blacks were all in charge.  As in Africa.  Which has no problems.) 


– Professor Gregory Jay, a lily-white professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, is calling for the complete “abolition of whiteness.”


– Carmen Goséy, the chair of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s student government, said “all white people are racist” – which in itself is a racist statement.  In this same university, one can enroll in the racist course “Problem of Whiteness,” taught by the African Cultural Studies Department’s Damon Sajnani, all at (white) taxpayers’ expense.


– Johnny Eric Williams, associate professor of sociology at Trinity College in Hartford, calls white people inhuman.  When members of Congress were shot at and wounded by a liberal, Williams wrote an article entitled “Let Them F‑‑‑‑‑‑ Die” instead of aiding the victims.  He was briefly put on leave, then Trinity College president Joanne Berger-Sweeney and Trinity dean and vice president Tom Cresswell came to his aid, embraced him, and reinstated him.


– Sunken-chested George Ciccariello-Maher, a white communist professor of politics and global studies at Philadelphia’s Drexel University, called for white genocide.  He later whined to a sympathetic CNN reporter because he had received nasty phone messages that suggested he should be the first on the white genocide list.  Ultimately, he resigned from Drexel, even though the president of the university had tried to shield him, and was instantly hired by the prestigious New York University, which is infested with Marxists.  He recently compared the American national anthem to – of course – the Nazi salute.


– At St. John’s College in Santa Fe, one racist, Maggie Reitz-Wells, working from the deadwood Office of Student Life, sent a system-wide invitation to attend an indoctrination group.  “The main topic for discussion will be an ongoing one: How do we deal with the depravity of whiteness and the brutality of masculinity?  How can we get to the root of this problem?”  White participants will be encouraged to confess their “white depravity,” as was the case during the Cultural Revolution.  When asked about this event, Assistant Dean Jan Arsenault became upset – not that this bizarre event was taking place, but that outsiders had learned of it


– Recently hired Preston Mitchum, a law professor at Georgetown University, ranted that all white people are racist and all men are sexist.  Furthermore, “I really, really, really, really, really, really hate cops.  Hate them.  The power.  The unfettered abuse.  The narcissism.  Hate, hate them.”  When he next goes on a demonstration, expect him to carry one of those signs that says “Love Trumps Hate.”


– Kevin Allred is an instructor at Montclair State University and Rutgers University who proclaimed, “There are no good white people.  There are only less bad white people.”


– Stanford University will be offering a class on how to abolish whiteness.


– Earlier this year, Portland Community College designated April as a month in which to attack white people.  It was organized by white liberals.


– According to Portland State University Professor’s Rachel Sanders’s “White Privilege” course, “whiteness” must be eliminated.  She, too, is lily-white, which makes you wonder…what is she thinking?


– Angie Wellman, associate director in the Student Life Multicultural Center at Ohio State University, led the “Interrupting Racism: Tips & Tools for White People” event, where white students were essentially insulted and asked to own up to their white shortcomings.


– A conference on Critical Race Theory hosted by Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis became an orgiastic expression of racism against whites by both blacks and white liberals.  Among other things, it was declared that the concept of intellectual diversity is “white supremacist b‑‑‑‑‑‑‑.”


– A St. Louis kindergarten-through-grade 8 school called College School, associated with Webster University, has a “Witnessing Whiteness” program, brainchild of (what else?) school director of equality and inclusion Vincent Flewellen.


– Meanwhile, the elementary schools in Edina, Minnesota are busy brainwashing children, even borrowing a page from Mao’s China by having self-criticism sessions.  An A-B-C book has some gems such as “A is for Activist.”  “F is for Feminist.”  “X is for Malcolm as in Malcolm X.”  The high school in Edina goes a step farther by having a mandatory brainwashing class to eliminate something called “white privilege.”  As usual, conservative and libertarian parents are too apathetic to do anything about it.


– Charles H.F. Davis, a black assistant professor of clinical education and chief strategy officer and director of research of the USC Race and Equity Center, has expressed his desire that whites be destroyed.  He also wrote that policies that punish student-protesters are a form of racism.


– Ekow N. Yankah, a law professor at Yeshiva University, wrote in The New York Times (of course) that he would be teaching his children to be racist towards whites.


– George Washington University, through its (what else?) Multicultural Student Services Center, held an indoctrination session against “Christian privilege,” especially white Christians.  This dovetails nicely with the anti-Christian, pro-Muslim religion rampant in universities.


– At the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, (only) white students can take part in an indoctrination experience in order to obtain a – suitable for framing – Graduate Certificate in Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion that will explain that they are scum because they are white.  And they have to pay only $486 for the experience!  Shelly Tochluk, a professor at Mount Saint Mary’s University (MSMU) in Los Angeles, is the organizer, and it is offered by the nonprofit AWARE-LA (Alliance of White Anti-Racists Everywhere).


But I ask you, what is more contemptible: that such blatant racism is voiced, that liberals applaud it, that the mainstream media keep a lid on it – or that people do nothing about it?


Image: Gustave Doré, “The Hypocrites address Dante.”




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

Affirmative action in the control tower

I don’t fly.  When folks ask me why, the short answer is that I know too much: I’m a former FAA air traffic controller.


It’s been recently reported that the FAA is now actively recruiting new trainees to work in the towers and control rooms directing airplanes and that the criteria they now utilize to screen applicants is a curiously absurd “biographical questionnaire.”  Jason L. Riley in the Wall Street Journal:



A recently completed six-month investigation by Fox Business Network found that the Federal Aviation Administration has quietly moved away from merit-based hiring criteria in order to increase the number of women and minorities who staff airport control towers.  The changes come despite the fact that the FAA’s own internal reports describe the evidence for changing the hiring process as “weak.”


Until 2013, the FAA gave hiring preference to controller applicants who earned a degree from one of its Collegiate Training Initiative schools and scored high enough on an eight-hour screening test called the Air Traffic Selection and Training exam, or AT-SAT, which measures cognitive skills.  The Obama administration, however, determined that the process excluded too many from minority groups.  In May 2013, the FAA’s civil rights administrator issued “barrier analyses” of the agency’s employment procedures, which recommended “revising how the AT-SAT is used in establishing best-qualified lists.”


By the start of last year, the FAA was using a biographical questionnaire (BQ) to initially vet potential hires.  The questions – “How many sports did you play in high school?”, “What has been the major cause of your failures?” – seem designed to elicit stories of personal disadvantage or family hardship rather than determine success on the job.


I can tell you with absolute certainty that the FAA Air Traffic Control Division has been down with the affirmative action program for a long time. 


The PATCO controllers’ strike during the summer of 1981 seemingly gave the “fire whitey” gang the opening they craved.  There was one problem.  The air traffic system needed to get back up and running smoothly, and especially safely, so that Ronald Reagan’s mass firing would look reasonable.  So they quickly hired aviation-experienced people, including pilots and experienced military air traffic controllers.  I was one of them.  Granted, some of these well qualified new guys were black, but no one would look upon this new controller work force and call it a model of so-called diversity.  The big push for hiring other than pale males would have to wait.  Safety first, as it were.


A few things happened in the next few years.  First, the FAA stopped reporting aviation incidents, including near mid-air collisions and runway incursions.  When safety incidents are under-reported or deceitfully downgraded, the system starts to look like perfection, and the FAA will gladly report, as it frequently does, that it is “The Safest System In The World.”  These people want the flying public to skate out onto the ice, even as they are lying about how thin the ice is, and while we are at it, how warm it is today.


Along with under-reporting system failures, the FAA started conspiring, almost openly, with leftist groups like the Black and Hispanic Controller’s Coalition.  Gay and lesbian organizations started demanding hiring and promotion slots for their members – as if one’s preference for a particular style of recreational sexual behavior is an indispensable predictor of air traffic control ability.


NATCA (the National Air Traffic Controllers’ Association) replaced PATCO.  I was one of their officers for a period.  The new union gave wide latitude to the wacky leftist organizations, even as they encroached on the union’s right to bargain exclusively for working conditions. 


The FAA “Biographical Questionnaire,” exposed last night by Tucker Carlson Tonight has been known to me for some time.  Knowing the FAA as I do, nothing about it surprises me.  The entire exercise is designed to identify applicants who are white males for the purpose of eliminating them from consideration.  The FAA has been openly hostile to straight white males since 1981.


My novelEXIT 13A – A Control Tower Diary, is an exposé on FAA abuse of power.  It is written in novel form so names could be changed to protect the guilty. 


There are a lot of reasons to limit your flying to only the most necessary flights.  The affirmative action angle is only a part of the problem.  For a more complete report, read the book.  Most people don’t believe me when I tell them that boarding an aircraft is like playing the world’s largest game of Russian roulette. 


 See you on Greyhound.


Willie Shields is a former USMC and FAA air traffic controller.  He has experience at some of the nation’s busiest control facilities.  Mr. Shields resides in Wilmington, Delaware.


I don’t fly.  When folks ask me why, the short answer is that I know too much: I’m a former FAA air traffic controller.


It’s been recently reported that the FAA is now actively recruiting new trainees to work in the towers and control rooms directing airplanes and that the criteria they now utilize to screen applicants is a curiously absurd “biographical questionnaire.”  Jason L. Riley in the Wall Street Journal:


A recently completed six-month investigation by Fox Business Network found that the Federal Aviation Administration has quietly moved away from merit-based hiring criteria in order to increase the number of women and minorities who staff airport control towers.  The changes come despite the fact that the FAA’s own internal reports describe the evidence for changing the hiring process as “weak.”


Until 2013, the FAA gave hiring preference to controller applicants who earned a degree from one of its Collegiate Training Initiative schools and scored high enough on an eight-hour screening test called the Air Traffic Selection and Training exam, or AT-SAT, which measures cognitive skills.  The Obama administration, however, determined that the process excluded too many from minority groups.  In May 2013, the FAA’s civil rights administrator issued “barrier analyses” of the agency’s employment procedures, which recommended “revising how the AT-SAT is used in establishing best-qualified lists.”


By the start of last year, the FAA was using a biographical questionnaire (BQ) to initially vet potential hires.  The questions – “How many sports did you play in high school?”, “What has been the major cause of your failures?” – seem designed to elicit stories of personal disadvantage or family hardship rather than determine success on the job.


I can tell you with absolute certainty that the FAA Air Traffic Control Division has been down with the affirmative action program for a long time. 


The PATCO controllers’ strike during the summer of 1981 seemingly gave the “fire whitey” gang the opening they craved.  There was one problem.  The air traffic system needed to get back up and running smoothly, and especially safely, so that Ronald Reagan’s mass firing would look reasonable.  So they quickly hired aviation-experienced people, including pilots and experienced military air traffic controllers.  I was one of them.  Granted, some of these well qualified new guys were black, but no one would look upon this new controller work force and call it a model of so-called diversity.  The big push for hiring other than pale males would have to wait.  Safety first, as it were.


A few things happened in the next few years.  First, the FAA stopped reporting aviation incidents, including near mid-air collisions and runway incursions.  When safety incidents are under-reported or deceitfully downgraded, the system starts to look like perfection, and the FAA will gladly report, as it frequently does, that it is “The Safest System In The World.”  These people want the flying public to skate out onto the ice, even as they are lying about how thin the ice is, and while we are at it, how warm it is today.


Along with under-reporting system failures, the FAA started conspiring, almost openly, with leftist groups like the Black and Hispanic Controller’s Coalition.  Gay and lesbian organizations started demanding hiring and promotion slots for their members – as if one’s preference for a particular style of recreational sexual behavior is an indispensable predictor of air traffic control ability.


NATCA (the National Air Traffic Controllers’ Association) replaced PATCO.  I was one of their officers for a period.  The new union gave wide latitude to the wacky leftist organizations, even as they encroached on the union’s right to bargain exclusively for working conditions. 


The FAA “Biographical Questionnaire,” exposed last night by Tucker Carlson Tonight has been known to me for some time.  Knowing the FAA as I do, nothing about it surprises me.  The entire exercise is designed to identify applicants who are white males for the purpose of eliminating them from consideration.  The FAA has been openly hostile to straight white males since 1981.


My novelEXIT 13A – A Control Tower Diary, is an exposé on FAA abuse of power.  It is written in novel form so names could be changed to protect the guilty. 


There are a lot of reasons to limit your flying to only the most necessary flights.  The affirmative action angle is only a part of the problem.  For a more complete report, read the book.  Most people don’t believe me when I tell them that boarding an aircraft is like playing the world’s largest game of Russian roulette. 


 See you on Greyhound.


Willie Shields is a former USMC and FAA air traffic controller.  He has experience at some of the nation’s busiest control facilities.  Mr. Shields resides in Wilmington, Delaware.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

After Clinton Buddy Gov. McAuliffe Restores Rights To Felons, Pedophile Runs For Congress In VA

He will split the democrat vote.

Via Yahoo:

Nathan Larson, a 37-year-old accountant from Charlottesville, Virginia, is running for Congress as an independent candidate in his native state. He is also a pedophile, as he admitted to HuffPost on Thursday, who has bragged in website posts about raping his late ex-wife.

In a phone call, Larson confirmed that he created the now-defunct websites suiped.org and incelocalypse.today ― chat rooms that served as gathering places for pedophiles and violence-minded misogynists like himself. HuffPost contacted Larson after confirming that his campaign website shared an IP address with these forums, among others. His sites were terminated by their domain host on Tuesday.

On the phone, he was open about his pedophilia and seemingly unfazed about his long odds of attaining government office.

“A lot of people are tired of political correctness and being constrained by it,” he said. “People prefer when there’s an outsider who doesn’t have anything to lose and is willing to say what’s on a lot of people’s minds.”

When asked whether he’s a pedophile or just writes about pedophilia, he said, “It’s a mix of both. When people go over the top there’s a grain of truth to what they say.”

Asked whether there was a “grain of truth” in his essay about father-daughter incest and another about raping his ex-wife repeatedly, he said yes, offering that plenty of women have rape fantasies.

According to Larson’s campaign manifesto, his platform as a “quasi-neoreactionary libertarian” candidate includes protecting gun ownership rights, establishing free trade and protecting “benevolent white supremacy,” as well as legalizing incestuous marriage and child pornography.[…]

Larson’s political ambitions span more than a decade. He first ran for Congress in Virginia’s 1st District in 2008 on what he described as an “anarcho-capitalist” platform. That same year, he sent a letter to the Secret Service threatening to kill the president, which landed him in federal prison for 14 months and barred him from seeking public office.

But in 2016, then-Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) restored voting and other civil rights to thousands of felons, allowing Larson to campaign yet again. In 2017 he ran in Virginia’s House of Delegates District 31 and secured less than 2 percent of the vote. Now he is gunning for a seat in Virginia’s 10th Congressional District.

Keep reading…

HT: Snyper77

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Left-wing intolerance

It often feels like open season on Trump-supporters:




Doesn’t the left claim to be the model of tolerance in America?  While the left talks a big game about tolerance for a diversity of opinions and political beliefs, this political violence is simply unacceptable.



When Roseanne Barr recently made racist remarks about Valerie Jarrett, the left rightfully pounced.


Yet President Trump also rightly pointed out that when the media or other high-profile personalities use fake news and personal attacks against him, his family, or his supporters, the left remains silent.  Why the double standard?


When President Trump meets Kim Kardashian, he is mocked, yet when President Obama had a stampede of celebrities see him, it was cool.  Almost on cue to highlight the tolerance for intolerance on the left, Samantha Bee leveled a grotesque personal attack against Ivanka Trump on her TBS program just two days after Barr’s comments.  While the mainstream media reported on Bee’s insults, her show remains on the air. 


The left’s double standard applies not just to the president and celebrities – it also impacts everyday hardworking people who choose to engage in political discourse and express their views – and innocent people are being fired, attacked, and hurt because of it.  @AmyMek is a controversial Jewish Twitter influencer and outspoken critic of sharia.  While many of her tweets have been offensive, she has also been retweeted by President Trump and a slew of others.  She has a right to tweet, and her family shouldn’t be attacked for her political beliefs.


Until recently, @AmyMek had remained anonymous online, until HuffPost reporter Luke O’Brien exposed her full name in a recent exposé.  In the name of working on a story to expose @AmyMek’s true identity, O’Brien called her husband’s employer and “outed” his wife as the woman behind @AmyMek.  Her husband was promptly fired.  His offense?  Being married to a woman whose viewpoints some don’t like.


In his article, O’Brien went after Amy’s entire family, naming her father’s and brother’s businesses, neither of whom have anything to do with Amy’s Twitter account.  These attacks are entirely unfair and below the belt.  The implied threat here is that if you choose to speak out, your family will be found and targeted.  How is that fair?  Should people be fired and their businesses harmed for the political views of their family members?


I don’t expect the left to agree with those on the right, but I do expect some tolerance for a different worldview, even when they find that view offensive.  No one deserves to be fired for the views of his family members.  Guilt by association has no place in the American marketplace of ideas, and certainly not in the workplace.


Ronn Torossian is a leading P.R. firm CEO.


It often feels like open season on Trump-supporters:




Doesn’t the left claim to be the model of tolerance in America?  While the left talks a big game about tolerance for a diversity of opinions and political beliefs, this political violence is simply unacceptable.


When Roseanne Barr recently made racist remarks about Valerie Jarrett, the left rightfully pounced.


Yet President Trump also rightly pointed out that when the media or other high-profile personalities use fake news and personal attacks against him, his family, or his supporters, the left remains silent.  Why the double standard?


When President Trump meets Kim Kardashian, he is mocked, yet when President Obama had a stampede of celebrities see him, it was cool.  Almost on cue to highlight the tolerance for intolerance on the left, Samantha Bee leveled a grotesque personal attack against Ivanka Trump on her TBS program just two days after Barr’s comments.  While the mainstream media reported on Bee’s insults, her show remains on the air. 


The left’s double standard applies not just to the president and celebrities – it also impacts everyday hardworking people who choose to engage in political discourse and express their views – and innocent people are being fired, attacked, and hurt because of it.  @AmyMek is a controversial Jewish Twitter influencer and outspoken critic of sharia.  While many of her tweets have been offensive, she has also been retweeted by President Trump and a slew of others.  She has a right to tweet, and her family shouldn’t be attacked for her political beliefs.


Until recently, @AmyMek had remained anonymous online, until HuffPost reporter Luke O’Brien exposed her full name in a recent exposé.  In the name of working on a story to expose @AmyMek’s true identity, O’Brien called her husband’s employer and “outed” his wife as the woman behind @AmyMek.  Her husband was promptly fired.  His offense?  Being married to a woman whose viewpoints some don’t like.


In his article, O’Brien went after Amy’s entire family, naming her father’s and brother’s businesses, neither of whom have anything to do with Amy’s Twitter account.  These attacks are entirely unfair and below the belt.  The implied threat here is that if you choose to speak out, your family will be found and targeted.  How is that fair?  Should people be fired and their businesses harmed for the political views of their family members?


I don’t expect the left to agree with those on the right, but I do expect some tolerance for a different worldview, even when they find that view offensive.  No one deserves to be fired for the views of his family members.  Guilt by association has no place in the American marketplace of ideas, and certainly not in the workplace.


Ronn Torossian is a leading P.R. firm CEO.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Opening the White House to the Muslim Brotherhood

One of the unfortunate side effects of Roseanne’s racist tweet implosion involving Valerie Jarrett is that it may put off limits the documented influence held by the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama administration – influence that was so great that we handed over a loyal ally, Egypt, into its control for a time.


The key player in Obama’s administration is the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.  Her role in the Obama administration has been likened to the mysterious Rasputin in the era of the Russian czars:



Her influence is shown by an account in Richard Miniter’s book “Leading From Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for Him.”


It relates that at the urging of Jarrett, Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden on three occasions before finally approving the May 2, 2011, Navy SEAL mission.  Seems she was concerned about the possible political harm to Obama if the mission failed.


Then there is Huma Abedin, wife of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner and top aide to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.  She is expected to assume the Jarrett role in a Hillary Clinton White House.  Her affiliations and loyalties are also suspect:


Her father is said to be close with the Saudi government’s Muslim World League, and her mother is said to be a member of the Muslim Sisterhood.  World Trade Center bombing prosecutor Andrew McCarthy wrote in National Review: “The ties of Ms. Abedin’s father, mother and brother to the Muslim Brotherhood are both specific and substantiated.”


The Muslim Brotherhood took power in Egypt with the Obama administration’s approval after it had all but abandoned the government of Hosni Mubarak, a long-time ally and friend.  It was while Abedin was advising Hillary that State dropped its long-standing policy of having no dealings with the Muslim Brotherhood.


In early 2015, Jarrett brokered a meeting between Obama and 14 Muslim leaders, some with disturbingly close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:


[T]he White House confirmed that Azhar Azeez, President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), was one of the Muslim leaders that met with President Obama.  ISNA was founded in 1981 by members of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The group was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial[.] …


Azeez’s bio also reveals him as a founding member the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) Dallas/Fort Worth Chapter.  CAIR has also allegedly funneled money to Palestinian terror groups and was also started by members of the Muslim Brotherhood[.] …


Hoda Elshishtawy of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) was also in attendance at the Muslim leaders’ meeting with President Obama.


MPAC, just like CAIR and ISNA, was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood[.] …


Mohamed Majid, who serves as Imam of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS), was also in attendance at the White House meeting with the President, and senior advisors Ben Rhodes and Valerie Jarrett.


In 2002, ADAMS was raided as part of a U.S. government initiative called “Operation Green Quest,” where federal agents suspected the group of supporting terrorist organizations.  Government documents said that the ADAMS Center was “suspected of providing support to terrorists, money laundering, and tax evasion.”


If you have ever wondered just why President Obama could never bring himself to condemn or even say “radical Islamic terrorism,” Valerie Jarrett is one of the reasons.  One of the very first things he did as president was to give a speech to students in Cairo in 2009 in which he apologized for America’s role as the world bully, particularly in the Islamic world, and for our support of our only true ally in the Middle East.  His snubbing of both Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was not subtle, and his push to make Iran a nuclear power, in opposition to the will of Congress and the American people, showed just where his, and Jarrett’s, hearts were.


Christians were being murdered around the world, and little was done by the Obama-Jarrett administration to help them or even acknowledge the fact or that Islamic jihadists have marked them for genocide.  President Obama’s silence on this ongoing slaughter speaks volumes about his and Jarrett’s true loyalties:


From the Christian-influenced Yazidis in Iraq to the Christian schoolgirls targeted by Boko Haram in Nigeria, Christians worldwide have had their churches bombed and burned and themselves murdered, all because of what they believe and who they are.


Yet, with few exceptions, Obama refuses to acknowledge or even mention this fact.


On Sunday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest, who had also expressed the administration’s condemnation of the “random” attacks in Paris, issued a statement condemning the IS’s murder of 21 Egyptian “citizens.” No mention of their being Coptic Christians.


Ft. Hood was “workplace violence.”  Benghazi was a spontaneous response to an inflammatory video.  Paris was just a case of people being in the wrong place at the wrong time.  When world leaders marched in Paris to protest the latest Islamic atrocity, Barack Hussein Obama was conspicuous by his absence.


In Obama’s world, Islam is a religion of tolerance; not so much Christians, maligned as “bitter clingers.”  He took a shot at Christians when he said at an Easter Prayer Breakfast that “I have to say that, sometimes when I listen to other less-than-loving expressions by Christians, I get concerned.”  Not so concerned was he by the mass beheading of Coptic Christians on a Libyan beach by the Islamic State.


The coziness among Obama, Jarrett, Abedin, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other radical Islamic terrorist groups is a historical fact and should not be obscured by a bigoted tweet.


Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.










One of the unfortunate side effects of Roseanne’s racist tweet implosion involving Valerie Jarrett is that it may put off limits the documented influence held by the Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama administration – influence that was so great that we handed over a loyal ally, Egypt, into its control for a time.


The key player in Obama’s administration is the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.  Her role in the Obama administration has been likened to the mysterious Rasputin in the era of the Russian czars:


Her influence is shown by an account in Richard Miniter’s book “Leading From Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for Him.”


It relates that at the urging of Jarrett, Obama canceled the operation to kill Osama bin Laden on three occasions before finally approving the May 2, 2011, Navy SEAL mission.  Seems she was concerned about the possible political harm to Obama if the mission failed.


Then there is Huma Abedin, wife of disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner and top aide to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.  She is expected to assume the Jarrett role in a Hillary Clinton White House.  Her affiliations and loyalties are also suspect:


Her father is said to be close with the Saudi government’s Muslim World League, and her mother is said to be a member of the Muslim Sisterhood.  World Trade Center bombing prosecutor Andrew McCarthy wrote in National Review: “The ties of Ms. Abedin’s father, mother and brother to the Muslim Brotherhood are both specific and substantiated.”


The Muslim Brotherhood took power in Egypt with the Obama administration’s approval after it had all but abandoned the government of Hosni Mubarak, a long-time ally and friend.  It was while Abedin was advising Hillary that State dropped its long-standing policy of having no dealings with the Muslim Brotherhood.


In early 2015, Jarrett brokered a meeting between Obama and 14 Muslim leaders, some with disturbingly close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:


[T]he White House confirmed that Azhar Azeez, President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), was one of the Muslim leaders that met with President Obama.  ISNA was founded in 1981 by members of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The group was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial[.] …


Azeez’s bio also reveals him as a founding member the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) Dallas/Fort Worth Chapter.  CAIR has also allegedly funneled money to Palestinian terror groups and was also started by members of the Muslim Brotherhood[.] …


Hoda Elshishtawy of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) was also in attendance at the Muslim leaders’ meeting with President Obama.


MPAC, just like CAIR and ISNA, was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood[.] …


Mohamed Majid, who serves as Imam of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS), was also in attendance at the White House meeting with the President, and senior advisors Ben Rhodes and Valerie Jarrett.


In 2002, ADAMS was raided as part of a U.S. government initiative called “Operation Green Quest,” where federal agents suspected the group of supporting terrorist organizations.  Government documents said that the ADAMS Center was “suspected of providing support to terrorists, money laundering, and tax evasion.”


If you have ever wondered just why President Obama could never bring himself to condemn or even say “radical Islamic terrorism,” Valerie Jarrett is one of the reasons.  One of the very first things he did as president was to give a speech to students in Cairo in 2009 in which he apologized for America’s role as the world bully, particularly in the Islamic world, and for our support of our only true ally in the Middle East.  His snubbing of both Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was not subtle, and his push to make Iran a nuclear power, in opposition to the will of Congress and the American people, showed just where his, and Jarrett’s, hearts were.


Christians were being murdered around the world, and little was done by the Obama-Jarrett administration to help them or even acknowledge the fact or that Islamic jihadists have marked them for genocide.  President Obama’s silence on this ongoing slaughter speaks volumes about his and Jarrett’s true loyalties:


From the Christian-influenced Yazidis in Iraq to the Christian schoolgirls targeted by Boko Haram in Nigeria, Christians worldwide have had their churches bombed and burned and themselves murdered, all because of what they believe and who they are.


Yet, with few exceptions, Obama refuses to acknowledge or even mention this fact.


On Sunday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest, who had also expressed the administration’s condemnation of the “random” attacks in Paris, issued a statement condemning the IS’s murder of 21 Egyptian “citizens.” No mention of their being Coptic Christians.


Ft. Hood was “workplace violence.”  Benghazi was a spontaneous response to an inflammatory video.  Paris was just a case of people being in the wrong place at the wrong time.  When world leaders marched in Paris to protest the latest Islamic atrocity, Barack Hussein Obama was conspicuous by his absence.


In Obama’s world, Islam is a religion of tolerance; not so much Christians, maligned as “bitter clingers.”  He took a shot at Christians when he said at an Easter Prayer Breakfast that “I have to say that, sometimes when I listen to other less-than-loving expressions by Christians, I get concerned.”  Not so concerned was he by the mass beheading of Coptic Christians on a Libyan beach by the Islamic State.


The coziness among Obama, Jarrett, Abedin, the Muslim Brotherhood, and other radical Islamic terrorist groups is a historical fact and should not be obscured by a bigoted tweet.


Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

Nolte: Media Normalize C*nt, C*ckholster, Joy Reid, Porn Stars, Booing Rape Victims

Which one it was, I don’t remember, but when you’re talking about America’s uninteresting and predictable (in a pedantic left-wing kinda way) Sunday morning news shows, does it really matter?

What I do remember is the fear in the eyes of all concerned. Donald Trump had just won the presidency, our media were still in shock, and this panel of Sunday geniuses were fumbling about trying to prove a nationwide election did not just expose them as the mindless herd of provincial know-nothings they really are.

Oh, and I also remember that about half of the guys on this particular panel were later fired over decades of sexual misconduct (which actually doesn’t help at all to narrow down which Sunday show it was).

Anyway,  one of these panelists (I think the one who masturbated in front of an intern) said to another panelist (I think the one who sent dick pics to an intern while forcing her to watch him take a shower) came up with a word that made this entire panel of emotionally shattered Thought Leaders feel a little better about themselves and their place in the world — and that word was NORMS.

“During the upcoming Trump-era, we in the media have a responsibility to protect the cherished norms Trump is sure to threaten,” one of them managed to squeak out about five months before he was fired for flashing an intern with dick pics of him masturbating in front of an intern watching him take a shower.

“We must protect the norms,” one of the brittle feminist panelists added about six months before we learned she knew all about how the other panelists sexually terrorized interns but said nothing so she could be on a Sunday show.

“Oh, yes, yes… the norms,” One-Of-The-Left-Wing-White-Guys-Who-Knows-Nothing-About-Real-Life-But-Still-Gets-To-Host-A-Sunday-Show, replied, as the confused fear in his eyes sharpened into something closer to zealotry and purpose.

Then, all around the studio table, the full panel of Sunday Morons began to murmur about “norms” until it sounded like Mia Farrow’s neighbors praying to Satan in Rosemary’s Baby. “Norms. Norms. Yes, norms. NORMS! We must protect the norms. PROTECT! We are the keeper of the norms. KEEP! Keep the norms. KEEEEP THEMMMM!”

My reaction watching this was exactly what it has been towards the establishment media since Trump’s victory, since the day I was liberated from 25-years of worrying about the media’s impact on public opinion: “Assholes.”

Imagine the narcissistic arrogance these pompous simpletons must be infected with in order to bestow upon their self-righteous selves the title of America’s Norm Sheriff. I mean, here you are, a member of the establishment media — one of the most distrusted and loathed institutions in the world; no one elected you to do anything, much less to abuse your power to protect our social and democratic norms; no one even elected you through public acclaim (the highest rated Sunday show in the country cannot attract two percent of the population); and yet, here was this group of smug, unelected, know-nothings with approval ratings just above that of “child molester” organizing against a man who had just won the presidency with some 65 million votes.

“Good luck with that, children,” I said to the Sunday Coven, before flipping channels until I found one of those Avengers episodes broadcast in color where Emma Peel’s wearing leather to remind you that life is worth living as long as there is TV.

Flash-forward 18 months and look at the media’s precious norms now…

In summation: “cunt,” “cockholster,” Joy Reid, booing rape victims, Stormy Daniels, and that “divine spark” in MS-13, whose motto is “Rape, Kill, and Control.” (But in their defense, I’m told MS-13 only went with that after learning Ford had already copyrighted, “Quality is job one.”)

The very same media that just 18 months before was in a barely-controlled panic over what Trump might do to norms, now demand we be horrified over the idea of describing MS-13 as “animals,” but does not believe there should be any professional consequences for using the words “cunt” and “cockholster” on national television.

And these were not jokes. I’ll defend a joke to the end of the earth. This was just name-calling; this was two angry leftists, Samantha Bee and Stephen Colbert, screaming sexist and homophobic obscenities at Ivanka “The Feckless Cunt” Trump and Donald “The Cockholster” Trump.

Oh, sure, our media went through the motions of throwing a tut-tut at their ideological colleagues Colbert and Bee, but drew the line at the only true norm-enforcer known as a “professional consequence,” even as this very same media destroyed Roseanne Barr, Justine Sacco, Curt Schilling, and  Elizabeth Lauten.

Welcome to the media’s new norm, y’all — you can now call the president’s daughter a “feckless cunt” and the president a “cockholster” and suffer no professional consequences. Well, done media!

Speaking of “professional consequences,” how about that Joy Reid? America’s Norm Sheriffs would like to announce another new norm: You can now lie to the whole world to cover up your bigoted, anti-Semitic, conspiracy theory-spreading backside; you can even lie to the FBI; and you still get to remain a star at NBC News, an anchor at MSNBC.  

Speaking of backsides, how about that Stormy Daniels? America’s Norm Sheriffs would like to announce another new norm: Since our Russian collusion and obstruction hoax has collapsed, we’re gonna go with the porn star and her hack lawyer.

Speaking of hacks, how about that Jake Tapper, whose ego and self-regard cannot be sated with a trivial title like Norm Sheriff, and so he has anointed himself America’s Decency Czar. And now America’s Decency Czar would like to announce a new standard of decency: In the noble crusade of gun-grabbing, it is totally cool to allow your audience to boo a rape victim. Harrumph. Harrumph.

While the media freak out over Trump’s norm-busting tweets and tariffs, they are gleefully annihilating every norm with respect to journalistic standards of truth, of moral decency, of professional standards and ethics, of not making a political hero out of those who do anal for money, of not filing false reports with the FBI, of not  — my God — booing rape victims.

 

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com