O-BUMMER: Even South Africans Want NOTHING To Do With Barack Hussein O.

Sucks to be you, bro.

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

Thanks to an invitation from the Nelson Mandela Foundation, former President Barack Hussein Obama is slated to travel to South Africa next month to deliver a speech to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the anti-apartheid revolutionary’s birth.

There’s just one problem: Some South Africans want nothing to do with him because of his administration’s “War on Terror.”

In an open letter sent earlier this month, the Cage Africa advocacy organization accused Obama of being a warmonger whose administration oversaw the “torture, arbitrary imprisonment and rendition, and extrajudicial killings through indiscriminate drone and air attacks” of “thousands of innocent” Africans.

“Giving this man a platform would be tantamount to condoning the commission of the
international crimes linked to him and his administration,” the organization wrote.

“Obama himself has even conceded that he took the lives of innocents and yet neither
he nor his administration has taken a step to apologise or compensate the victims of his
army’s killing sprees, torture programme or rendition networks. None of them have been
held accountable. Such arrogance is reminiscent of our apartheid abusers, and your
Foundation surely cannot condone this.”

Obama arrogant!? What you talkin’ ’bout, Willis!?

Cage Africa Letter To Nelson Mandela Foundation About Barack Obama by Vivek Saxena on Scribd

Oumar Ba, a professor of international relations in Atlanta, told the media that Obama would be remembered for “the militarization of US foreign policy on the African continent, his use of drones, his immigration policy and his disastrous intervention in Libya.”

And also for having the tendency to lecture the African people, according to Al Jazeera:

In a 2015 speech at the African Union headquarters in Ethiopia, Obama called on some of the continent’s elder statesmen to step down. But critics said the president of the US had “no moral right to lecture Africans”, dismissing what they said appeared to be a tone-deaf message given his country’s continued support for some of the continent’s autocratic leaders.

“Obama pursued the same predatory and criminal policies that provoked international anger and hatred under his predecessor George W Bush,” Ibrahim Vawda, of the South Africa-based Media Review Network, said in a statement also calling the Nelson Mandela Foundation to withdraw its invitation.

“His stated theme of promoting ‘democracy’ in Africa was absurd and hypocritical.”

Na’eem Jeenah, the director of the Johannesburg-based Afro-Middle East Centre (AMEC), told Al Jazeera that he expects the opposition to Obama’s speech to grow as July approaches.

“The argument is that Obama, through his actions as president, most certainly does not represent Mandela’s legacy … [and] the past decade of Obama’s life does not suggest to us that he has the credentials to talk about renewing Mandela’s legacy or that he has been active in promoting active citizenship — either in his own country or abroad,” he said.

“At the very least, they [critics] believe that the speaker, especially on Mandela’s 100th birthday, should be someone who actually does represent Mandela’s legacy, and it should preferably be an African,” he added.

H/T The_Donald

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

CNN Touts Town With All Black Criminal Justice System, But There’s One Glaring Problem

Uh oh …………

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

CNN ran a story over the weekend about a Georgia town where eight black women “hold the reigns of power.” Why does anyone care that black women happen to command political power in this town? Beats me …

Especially since the composition of South Fulton’s judicial system makes perfect since given the town’s demographics: Almost 90 percent of its residents are black. So of course blacks comprise the majority of its government!

Nevertheless, CNN and a boatload of other outlets enthusiastically ran stories about these eight women and how they run their court system. Much like former President Barack Obama, they strongly believe in leniency for suspected criminals:

So is justice really any different in South Fulton compared to the rest of the country, where it’s mostly meted out by white men?

Yes, the women say. Being both black and female means they see things a little bit differently. Being black means they have empathy for many of the defendants who end up in police custody or appear in the courtroom, and they understand the fear that the criminal justice system will be biased against them because of the color of their skin.

They also say that as women they are natural nurturers, so they care deeply about the citizens they meet and want to help them succeed in life.

Does anyone else find it disturbing that these powerful women believe in glaring lies about America’s criminal justice system? Or that they assume white courtroom officials lack empathy?

As Manhattan Institute fellow and criminal justice expert Heather Mac Donald noted back in 2008, “The black incarceration rate is overwhelmingly a function of black crime. Insisting otherwise only worsens black alienation and further defers a real solution to the black crime problem.”

Speaking in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee seven years later, Mac Donald again reiterated this point, saying, “The most dangerous misconception about our criminal justice system is that it is pervaded by racial bias.

“For decades, criminologists have tried to find evidence for that bias, and they have always come up short. In fact, racial differences in criminal offending account for all of the racial disproportionality of blacks in prison.”

Fast-forward to the 2:03:00 mark below if you want to hear her for yourself:

The eight women who run South Fulton clearly believe otherwise, and I suspect this could potentially be a problem.

Mind you, interim police chief Sheila Rogers is adamant “that being black and a woman doesn’t change the way she enforces the law,” according to CNN. “But she believes her empathic point of view and nurturing tendencies do influence how she treats people, and that trickles down through her 91-person department.”

But is policing about being empathetic or about enforcing the law? And what about courtroom justice — is it about being empathetic or is it about doling out proper justice?

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

‘Crisis of Democracy’: N.Y. Times Op-Ed Supports Abusing Republicans in Public, Ignores Liberals Shooting, Beating Conservatives

‘Crisis of Democracy’: N.Y. Times Op-Ed Supports Abusing Republicans in Public, Ignores Liberals Shooting, Beating Conservatives

The New York Times published an op-ed by Michelle Goldberg Monday night that supports the public abuse Republicans and Trump administration officials have been subjected to this past week. Goldberg’s op-ed is titled, “We Have a Crisis of Democracy, Not Manners“.

A sample of liberal violence against conservatives in recent years: A Republican Congressman shot, a Trump supporter attacked, a limo set ablaze at Trump’s inauguration.

The central premise is incorrect as the U.S. is a republic, not a democracy. Democracy is straight majority rule–mob rule, as has been witnessed this past week in mob actions against woman GOP government officials Sarah Huckabee, Pam Bondi and Kirstjen Nielsen.

Goldberg’s article is intellectually dishonest as it falsely paints liberals as peaceful, unarmed saints, who have reached the limit of their saintliness, confronting evil Republicans.

Goldberg opens talking about white racist Richard Spencer, whom the media has elevated from a nobody to use as a cudgel against the Trump administration. Curiously though, Goldberg writes about Spencer being kicked out of a membership gym rather than the infamous “punch a Nazi” attack on him last year seen in a viral video cheered by liberals. As many conservatives who loathe Spencer and his racism warned, liberals call all conservatives Nazis and were therefore justifying attacks on conservatives.

Sure enough a few months after liberals proclaimed “punch a Nazi” was acceptable, a Democrat tried to mass assassinate a group of Republican Congressman and Senators, grievously wounding Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) and several others.

That mass assassination attempt by a Democrat on Republicans just last year goes unmentioned in Goldberg’s article, even as Goldberg rightly calls out the murder of abortion providers.

Goldberg does not mention riotous attacks on Trump supporters by liberals at President Trump’s inauguration last year.

Also not mentioned by Goldberg are the many violent attacks by liberals on Trump supporters attending Trump campaign rallies in 2016.

Goldberg chastises Trump for his intemperate comments encouraging violence against protesters repeatedly disrupting his rallies, but does not put them in the context that he was reacting to the continuous incivility of liberals at his rallies and their violent attacks on his supporters.

Unmentioned by Goldberg is that a protester attempted to assassinate candidate Trump at a rally by trying to grab a gun off a law enforcement officer to shoot Trump. At another rally a deranged protester charged the stage as Trump was speaking, jumping over a barricade and reaching the edge of the stage before being stopped.

Nor does Goldberg talk about Antifa, the violent organized wing of liberalism that riots and attacks conservatives in public. Goldberg falsely states that liberals have not protested Trump and conservatives while carrying “assault weapons” when that has occurred many times in states that allow open carry.

See: Antifa: The hard left’s call to arms

Image by John Mees, ABC Australia.

And:

Liberals are cheering Goldberg’s column because of passages like these:

It’s a little more complicated when the professional racist is the president of the United States. The norms of our political life require a degree of bipartisan forbearance. But treating members of Donald Trump’s administration as ordinary public officials rather than pariahs does more to normalize bigotry than exercising alongside a white separatist.

…Whether or not you think public shaming should be happening, it’s important to understand why it’s happening. It’s less a result of a breakdown in civility than a breakdown of democracy. Though it’s tiresome to repeat it, Donald Trump eked out his minority victory with help from a hostile foreign power. He has ruled exclusively for his vengeful supporters, who love the way he terrifies, outrages and humiliates their fellow citizens. Trump installed the right-wing Neil Gorsuch in the Supreme Court seat that Republicans stole from Barack Obama. Gorsuch, in turn, has been the fifth vote in decisions on voter roll purges and, on Monday, racial gerrymandering that will further entrench minority rule.

All over the country, Republican members of Congress have consistently refused to so much as meet with many of the scared, furious citizens they ostensibly represent. A great many of these citizens are working tirelessly to take at least one house of Congress in the midterms — which will require substantially more than 50 percent of total votes, given structural Republican advantages — so that the country’s anti-Trump majority will have some voice in the federal government.

But unless and until that happens, millions and millions of Americans watch helplessly as the president cages children, dehumanizes immigrants, spurns other democracies, guts health care protections, uses his office to enrich himself and turns public life into a deranged phantasmagoria with his incontinent flood of lies. The civility police might point out that many conservatives hated Obama just as much, but that only demonstrates the limits of content-neutral analysis. The right’s revulsion against a black president targeted by birther conspiracy theories is not the same as the left’s revulsion against a racist president who spread birther conspiracy theories.

…Faced with the unceasing cruelty and degradation of the Trump presidency, liberals have not taken to marching around in public with assault weapons and threatening civil war.

…Instead, some progressive celebrities have said some bad words, and some people have treated administration officials with the sort of public opprobrium due members of any other white nationalist organization. Liberals are using their cultural power against the right because it’s the only power they have left, and people have a desperate need to say, and to hear others say, that what is happening in this country is intolerable.

Sometimes, their strategies may be poorly conceived. But there’s an abusive sort of victim-blaming in demanding that progressives single-handedly uphold civility, lest the right become even more uncivil in response. As long as our rulers wage war on cosmopolitan culture, they shouldn’t feel entitled to its fruits. If they don’t want to hear from the angry citizens they’re supposed to serve, let them eat at Trump Grill.”

A sample of liberal and Blue Checkmark reaction:

Last word goes to the spot-on Chuck Woolery:

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

WATCH: ABC News Goes To Southern Border, Runs Into Smuggler With Illegal Aliens

A reporter with ABC News accompanied a border patrol agent to the U.S.-Mexico border on Monday where they ran into a group of alleged illegal aliens and a suspected human smuggler.
The agent chased the smuggler down a dirt path in McAllen, Texas until he reached the river and started heading south, back to Mexico.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

WATCH: Steven Crowder Confronts Death-Threat Making Liberal, Things Get Crazy

During the recent filming of one of his "Change My Mind" sessions in Texas, conservative comedian and political commentator Steven Crowder noticed that a left-wing activist that had recently called for the firebombing of his crew’s van in Austin was at the event. So, as Crowder is famous for doing, he went over to try to talk to her.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

James Woods Levels Maxine Waters, Tells Conservatives To Arm Themselves

I always thought if there was a Democrat who was going to go completely off the rails and more or less call for violence — or at least physical resistance — to the Trump administration, the clear choice was Maxine Waters. I mean, the writing was on the wall: The California Democrat has been saying some pretty outré stuff since Donald Trump was elected, and it’s become clear that whatever tenuous ties to reality she may have had were loosed on Nov. 8, 2016.

Nevertheless, despite Waters’ tendencies, I still imagined this to be a relatively long shot. So, imagine my surprise when Maxine decided to go full Maxine and call for physical confrontation with Trump cabinet members.

“Let’s make sure we show up, wherever we have to show up,” Waters told a crowd in Los Angeles protesting immigration on Sunday.

“If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you cause a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome — anymore, anywhere.”

TRENDING: Kamala Harris Refused To Help Disabled Iraq War Vet After Illegal Immigrants Ruined His Life

“Mr. President, we will see you every day, every hour of the day, everywhere that we are to let you know you cannot get away with this,” she added.

So, there you have it: Maxine going full Maxine. And, as usual, James Woods couldn’t resist responding.

And his thoughts were spot on.

“Now that a United States Congresswoman has called for harassment against Republicans and the inevitable violence that will come of it, I urge all of you to a) get armed, and b) vote,” Woods said.

Do you think Americans should take James Woods’ advice?

“Your life literally depends on it.”

Each one of these is true. First, it’s not exactly like this is just hypothetical. Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was harassed at a showing of a documentary about (of all things) Mr. Rogers. This is going to move from harassment to violence very quickly — unless, of course, these individuals know that conservatives are going to be exercising their Second Amendment rights.

And secondly, get out and vote. This sort of rhetoric works among the most rabid of Democrats. Yet, that’s not most Americans, as we found out in the 2016 election.

Woods was hardly the only one who urged conservatives to take similar precautions in the wake of Waters’ threat. Former Milwaukee County, Wisconsin Sheriff David Clarke also advised similar actions.

RELATED: Mike Pence Issues a Bold Challenge to the Mainstream Media

However, Woods put it most succinctly and most brilliantly.

Let’s pray it never comes to this. However, if it does, it’s important for every American citizen to be prepared.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Even Red Cross Can’t Take MSNBC, Publicly Corrects Fake News About Trump

The frothing forces fighting President Donald Trump have been making quite a name for themselves in recent days.

Between a D.C.-area restaurant kicking out White House press secretary Sarah Sanders Friday night and the reliably deranged Rep. Maxine Waters calling on her followers on Sunday to physically harass Trump cabinet members they happen to see out in public, it’s been an interesting time to watch liberals in action.

But “Morning Joe” co-host Joe Scarborough, on the uber liberal MSNBC network, might have outdone them all.

Pretending to take the side of the American Red Cross, an iconic philanthropic group in American culture, Scarborough ended up essentially calling its leaders liars – because they had the temerity to correct him in public.

The incident started Friday evening, when Scarborough pounced on a Red Cross announcement that it had not yet been granted permission by the federal government to visit facilities where illegal immigrant children have been detained.

TRENDING: Kamala Harris Refused To Help Disabled Iraq War Vet After Illegal Immigrants Ruined His Life

Scarborough inflamed that rather dry bureaucratic statement into the idea that the Trump administration “is even banning” the Red Cross from the detention centers.

By any honest reckoning, that’s “fake news.”

To be fair to the turncoat former Republican, Scarborough wasn’t the only Trump hater to leap to that conclusion. The responses to the Red Cross Twitter post were replete with references to the Nazi concentration camps and genocide. (They’re the kinds of tricks leftists like Hitler and Stalin pull when they get their hands on absolute power.)

But the Red Cross still had to respond to Scarborough, explaining that the MSNBC host was in error. The response was politely worded and even apologized unnecessarily for Scarborough leaping to a conclusion that played into his biases, but the message was that he was simply wrong. “No one is ‘banning’ us from anything,” the Red Cross wrote.

Another man might have let it go. Scarborough had already used the Red Cross as a prop to attack the Trump administration, he could have dropped it and declared victory. But that’s not the way the anti-Trump crowd works these days.

He ended up attacking the organization he started out defending.

“Leave the spin to Sarah Huckabee Sanders,” he practically sneering in a responding tweet.

RELATED: White House Fires Back After MSNBC’s Scarborough Compares Immigration Policy to Nazis

Scarborough’s reaction is typical of the anti-Trump partisans these days.

Blinded by fury at an administration they despise, they are unable to see that there might be something – anything – that’s beyond what they think of as a malicious White House.

And when an innocuous group like the Red Cross dares to correct them in the humblest, mildest terms, they turn on what had only a moment before been a victim of Trump – and brand it essentially as a collaborationist organization lying to the American public on behalf of the Trump administration.

The saner part of the American public understands this, even if Scarborough and his crowd of deranged followers don’t. And the results of November’s midterms are likely to show it.

The past few days of liberal lunacy could well be setting up a liberal defeat come the fall.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

11 Up and Coming Young Conservatives You Should Know About

Some days it feels like everyone under 40 is liberal — at least, that’s what the media loves to tell us. But, yes, there are plenty of up and coming young conservatives you should be paying attention to.

For the purposes of this article, we’re going to assume you’re already familiar with young conservatives like Ben Shapiro and Steven Crowder. If you’re not, by all means, you should check them out, too. However, we’re going to focus on a few that might have escaped your attention.

Here are 11 reasons why the under-40 crowd isn’t as liberal as you might have thought.

Young Conservative #1: Katie Pavlich

Katie Pavlich is one of the most eminent conservative opinion journalists working today, currently writing for both Townhall.com and The Hill. She’s also been a contributor on Fox News’ “The Five.” In other words, she’s pretty much everywhere.

TRENDING: Kamala Harris Refused To Help Disabled Iraq War Vet After Illegal Immigrants Ruined His Life

A 29-year-old graduate of the University of Arizona, Pavlich moved to Washington, D.C. after graduation and became an editor for Townhall. She slowly moved up from there, making appearances on most of the major cable networks. In addition to her media appearances, she also authored, “Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-Up.”

Young Conservative #2: Lila Rose

Taking on abortion giant Planned Parenthood is a difficult task no matter who you are, particularly if you’re under the age of 30. However, the 29-year-old Rose has quickly established herself as one of America’s most preeminent pro-life activists, standing up to the abortion mill and other pro-death forces on the left.

Rose, an evangelical Protestant who converted to Catholicism, started Live Action when she was only 15-years-old. Rose met James O’Keefe of Project Veritas fame while she was in college and was inspired to take undercover videos of Planned Parenthood clinics. One of those videos even resulted in a loss of $61 million in state funding to the abortion giant. Anyone who can do that is well on their way to being a conservative legend, and all before the age of 30.

Here’s Rose discussing Trump’s decision to cut Title X funding for Planned Parenthood on Fox News:

Young Conservative #3: Ryan T. Anderson

Back in 2015, The Washington Post called Anderson “the conservative movement’s fresh-faced, millennial, Ivy League-educated spokesman against same-sex marriage.” He’s a bit more than that. Anderson, who’s received his Ph.D., is currently the William E. Simon senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation and an author of several books, mostly taking on the media’s narrative on issues of religious freedom.

His books include “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom” and “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment.” He’s also been cited in two Supreme Court cases.

RELATED: As Anger Mounts Over Restaurant Booting Sanders, Big Democrats Start Backpedaling Fast

Watch him debate same-sex marriage with Piers Morgan on CNN:

Young Conservative #4: Michael Knowles

Don’t let Knowles‘ patrician bearing fool you. Even though The Daily Wire podcast host may have a distinctly Buckley-esque bent, he’s only 28-years-old. The Yale graduate began in acting, including in several web-based series. After acting didn’t quite seem to work out, Knowles was invited onto The Daily Wire program of the decidedly not-under-30 Andrew Klavan, who hired him as a cultural correspondent in 2016. It was around this time that Knowles released the best-selling Amazon book, “Reasons to Vote for Democrats: A Comprehensive Guide.” (It’s totally blank.)

Knowles has gotten his own podcast with The Daily Wire, joining Klavan and Wire impresario Ben Shapiro. No word yet on whether he plans a follow-up to his book, but he’ll probably require words this time.

Watch him in this PragerU video below:

Young Conservative #5: Kristin Tate

Kristin Tate isn’t a fan of government waste. In fact, the self-described “Libertarian Chick” writes columns about how the federal government is spending your money for The Hill, in between visits to Fox News, CNN and MSNBC. Her latest book is called “How Do I Tax Thee?” Her first book, “Government Gone Wild,” was a smash hit when it was released. And all of this well before she’s hit 30.

Tate, needless to say, isn’t a fan of the swamp: “Both the Democrats and the Republicans have shown over and over, year in and year out, no matter who controls Congress or the White House, they’re not interested in us as individuals or in protecting our rights and freedoms,” Tate wrote in “Government Gone Wild.”

“They prefer to call all the shots in Washington, D.C. They claim to know what’s best for us. But for them, it’s not about us. Instead it’s all about their power, their privilege, and doing just enough to make sure they’re elected to another term. And another, and another…”

Young Conservative #6: Jimmy Sengenberger

At some point, Rush Limbaugh will have to give up the golden EIB microphone and Dennis Prager will be gone from the airwaves. Will radio all go over to liberals at that point? Not if Jimmy Sengenberger has anything to do with it. The host of “Business for Breakfast with Jimmy Sengenberger” probably isn’t well known outside of Denver, where he hosts shows on both KDMT-AM and KNUS-AM, but the young host is making a name for himself in a medium that usually skews older in terms of demographics. And he’s been doing it since 2008 — meaning he’s a veteran of an industry when most people his age are simply doing news on the 8’s.

Sengenberger is also the president of the Liberty Day Institute, a non-profit founded in 1996. “Its longest-running initiative educates students, particularly fifth graders, on the U.S. Constitution and American government through Constitution booklets, classroom resources, and school volunteers,” Sengenberger notes on his webpage.

Here’s Sengenberger on social justice:

Young Conservative #7: Matt Walsh

We’ve all been conditioned so that when we hear the words “Christian conservative,” our mind immediately floats to someone older. Matt Walsh could change that.

Bearded, young and opinionated, Walsh has recently joined Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire, where he’s become somewhat well-known for doing his podcast from the confines of his car. Unlike his co-worker Michael Knowles, Walsh doesn’t have a blank book to his name; his “The Unholy Trinity: Blocking the Left’s Assault on Life, Marriage, and Gender” actually has words in it. Walsh is well-known for touching upon many themes, including moral rot in American society, the lack of responsibility among younger Americans and the importance of family.

Young Conservative #8: Kyle Kashuv

In the wake of the tragic Parkland shooting in February, many of the students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School became well-known political activists. While most of these were calling for gun control, Kashuv believed students could be kept safe without throwing the Second Amendment into the trash can.

This led to plenty of flak from the media — when they didn’t outright ignore him — including a bizarre saga where Newsweek reporter Kurt Eichenwald emailed Ben Shapiro insinuating that Kashuv was mentally ill. Throughout all of this, Kashuv has managed to maintain level while speaking out for his principles — both signs this is one young conservative who will go far.

Young Conservative #9: Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk began a career of conservative activism young — during his high school years, actually, when he started the group SOS Liberty. In 2012, he gained a modicum of fame when, upon graduating high school, he wrote an op-ed piece for Fox News about the national debt.

“In two weeks I will graduate from Wheeling High School,” Kirk wrote. “It is going to be a day to remember for the rest of my life. My principal will hand me a diploma, but that diploma is also an invoice for $870,000 — my share of America’s 2012 debt burden. The average American earns $1.3 million during their working career. When we factor in future deficit spending and interest, every single high school student owes the federal government more than they will ever earn in their lifetime. Since the day I was born, the United States has accrued eleven trillion dollars worth of new debt; and for those eighteen years of my existence, I haven’t even had a say in it.”

Kirk would begin having a say in it very soon. You may have heard of his forming a conservative group — Turning Point USA, home of Candace Owens, says that its “mission is to identify, educate, train, and organize students to promote the principles of freedom, free markets, and limited government.” It bills itself as “the largest and fastest growing youth organization in America.”

Kirk may have accomplished quite a bit at such a young age (24), but you can imagine we’ll see even more in the years to come. After all, as he said in his Fox News piece just a few short years ago: “There is significant promise in my generation. It is not too late to turn our fiscal ship around. Together we, the young people of America, can send a clear and concise message to every single Congressman, Senator, and Representative: We can’t afford it.”

Young Conservative #10: James O’Keefe

While many of you may know James O’Keefe’s videos or his Project Veritas, many of you aren’t familiar with the man behind the projects. You know the drill when it comes to Project Veritas: They target a liberal organization, liberal organization says the video was “edited as to remove context,” the people speaking in the video end up getting fired and/or resigning anyway.

With his very first video, O’Keefe managed to take down “community organizing” group ACORN by pretending to be a pimp trying to find lodging with his, um, employee — and getting plenty of help from members of the organization. On Project Veritas’ page, O’Keefe notes that his “investigations have led directly to the passage of new legislation, federal and state investigations, congressional inquiries, the de-funding of taxpayer-funded groups, arrests, resignations, firings, re-trainings and disciplinary action.”

And he’s still at it. Check out this recent undercover video his journalists did that exposed teachers’ unions (which, we must warn you, contains some sensitive material. Viewer discretion is advised):

Young Conservative #11: Candace Owens

For Candace Owens, getting a name-check from Kanye West its just part of the gig. The Turning Point USA pundit has been gaining a huge following on YouTube, to the point where the fine liberal folks at Salon have actually dubbed her the “toxic right’s newest African-American star.” I’m not quite sure what a rightist has to do in order to be labeled “toxic” or what Owens’ melanin has to do with this, but I’m going to chalk this up to having a lot more to do with the media than with any actual concern.

Owens is probably best known for her “Red Pill Black” YouTube vodcast, but she’s been an activist for a number of years now. In fact, her conservative activism has gone back to high school, when racist threats against her were linked to the son of the Democrat mayor of Stamford, Connecticut. That’s not the kind of thing that’s going to stop Owens, however, and she now has over 200,000 subscribers on YouTube.

These are the young conservatives. They’ve used new media — YouTube, podcasting, social media — to make a name for themselves. Yet the principles that they’re advocating — limited government, strong families, patriotism — are as old as the country.

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct