Texas Governor Erupts After Proposal To Change the Way the Alamo Is Taught


Commentary Real World

Texas Governor Erupts After Proposal To Change the Way the Alamo Is Taught

Drew Anthony Smith / Getty ImagesTexas Governor Greg Abbott holds a roundtable discussion with victims, family, and friends affected by the Santa Fe, Texas school shooting at the state capital on May 24, 2018 in Austin, Texas. Representatives from Sutherland Springs, Alpine, and Killeen were also invited and address the governor. (Drew Anthony Smith / Getty Images)

If you want to transform a society — start with the children. Teach them at an early age what you want society to be like in the future and they will make it so.

The left and conservatives have been in a virtual war for the minds of our youth for decades and now some Texans are fighting to keep the valor and heroism of one of their greatest historical battles at the forefront of history in school curriculums in their state.

In the never ending shifting of curriculum standards, state school boards struggle to jam pack content into daily lesson plans for K-12 courses of study. However Texans are conflicted as how to teach their students to remember the Alamo.

The Dallas News reported the struggle between the Texas State Board of Education and conservatives who want to keep heroism alive in the minds of Texas youths.

“A panel advising the State Board of Education on what seventh-graders should learn in their social studies courses has urged deleting the label “heroic” from a curriculum standard about the Alamo’s defenders.”

TRENDING: Kamala Harris Tries Defending Protesters; Suddenly, Protester Tanks Her Interview

The word was value charged, in their opinion.

Why yes it is, and Texans — who are proud of their state heritage and values — are up in arms over this suggestion.

Barbara Stevens, president of Daughters of the Republic of Texas feels the word “heroic” is “critical” in teaching children the values of the soldiers who fought and died at the Alamo.

“Words like ‘heroic’ to describe such men are indeed ‘value charged,’ and it is because anything less would be a disservice to their memories. To minimize the study of the Republic of Texas is to fail to teach a pivotal portion of the state’s history,” she said.

Should Texas schools take heroism out of their Alamo history lessons?

Governor Greg Abbott has declared war on political correctness as the TSBOE tries to diminish the heroism of those brave soldiers who fought and died trying to protect the Alamo. He tweeted out a call for Texans to make their voices heard on this issue.

In addition to removing heroism from the description, the advisory panel advised removing the Tavis Letter, or the “Victory or Death” letter from the curriculum as well.

“The advisory committee, made up of educators and historians, also suggested removing the requirement that students explain ‘the Travis Letter,’ sometimes referred to as the ‘Victory or Death’ letter. It was written by Lt. Col. William Barrett Travis during the Alamo battle. In it, he declared, ‘I shall never surrender or retreat’ from the thousand or more Mexican soldiers besieging the Alamo.

‘I am determined to sustain myself as long as possible and die like a soldier who never forgets what is due to his own honor and that of his country — victory or death,’ Travis wrote in 1836.”

RELATED: Texas Governor Greg Abbott Reveals Innovative Plan To Stop School Shootings

The argument made by the advisory panel is that teachers can explain the context of the battle instead of requiring separate discussions of the details of the letter.

Texans are a proud people and the governor wasn’t the only one to speak in defense of not diminishing history.

State Board of Education Chair Donna Bahorich made this diplomatic statement on Twitter.

In September of 2017 The Washington Post published a piece by Andrew Hartman, and he made an excellent point about how the public education is in a battle for the upper hand in the culture war.

“These curriculum controversies are not new. At their core is a debate over power and hierarchy in U.S. society. Those individuals and viewpoints that are valued in school curriculums have a decided advantage when it comes to making claims of moral authority. If American children, for example, grow up learning that evolutionary biology is the key to understanding human origins, creationist Americans will have a much more difficult time getting a hearing for their views and will thus lack moral authority in the important realm of science. Yet while curriculum battles shape and are shaped by the nation’s larger cultural wars, they also threaten to undermine a pillar of American democracy that should concern both sides: public education.”

“Heroism” is worth fighting for. It’s great to see that there are still those out there who are willing to stand up for what is right in spite of political correctness.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Army veteran’s company releases ‘Just Stand’ T-shirt in opposition to Nike’s Colin Kaepernick ads

Army veteran Tyler Merritt’s company, Nine Line Apparel, is releasing a t-shirt that reads “Just Stand,” in opposition to Nike’s new “Just Do It” campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick.

Kaepernick is the former NFL quarterback who started a trend of protesting police violence and racial inequality in America by kneeling during the national anthem at games. Although it spread throughout the league and other players participated, Kaepernick has faced backlash from critics who maintain the protest is disrespectful to the country. Among his critics are President Donald Trump.

Kaepernick is also involved in a lawsuit that alleges the NFL is colluding to keep him out of the league because of the protests.

Why did he do it?

“They decided to take a stance. This is our stand,” Merritt, a former Army captain and CEO of Nine Line, told Fox News on Saturday.

Nike’s agreement with Kaepernick includes his own apparel line, video ads, billboards with his image, and a contribution to the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback’s Know Your Rights charity, according to reports.

Nike faced backlash on social media after it released Kaepernick ads featuring the slogan: “Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything.”

Merritt said Saturday that it’s difficult to compare an athlete’s sacrifice to that of a soldier’s.

“The word ‘sacrifice’ in the military members — it’s something severe,” Merritt said.

Nike’s use of Kaepernick in its ad campaign flies in the face of those who might believe the former quarterback’s stance is offensive, Merritt said.

“I agree that police brutality is bad, but you know, wearing socks that say pigs…” he said. Merritt was referring to a time when Kaepernick wore socks that depicted police officers as pigs.

“Actions speak louder than words,” Merritt said. “If you want to say that you’re promoting social injustice, then actually do something.”

Have sales suffered?

Some critics called for boycott of Nike after the ad campaign was rolled out. Initially it was thought that it would hurt Nike sales. However, new information suggests that is not the case.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Obama cracks up with Trump Derangement Syndrome


On September 7, Barack Obama gave a speech in Illinois bitterly attacking President Trump and talking about his favorite subjects: himself and slavery.


Obama is angry.  He called on his followers to get out and vote in November to defeat Trump.  He is angry that the voters rejected him in 2016 by electing Trump instead of Hillary.  He knows that this was a rejection of his policies, and more importantly, it was a rejection of Obama personally.  Obama cannot accept this.  He and Joe Biden campaigned for Hillary daily, and Obama even said he would take it as a personal insult if black voters didn’t vote for Hillary.



Black voters and Hispanic voters ignored Obama’s orders. Trump got more black and Hispanic voters than Romney in 2012.


Obama cannot stand the success of President Trump.  The economy is booming, the stock market is booming, and unemployment is down, but Obama does not care that our country is doing well.  Obama has to give a speech to again try to divide us.


Obama went so far as to claim that the economy is doing well because of his policies.  He cannot accept that Trump turned around the weak Obama economy.   If he really believes this, he is delusional.


Obama said he does not need the Trump tax cuts.  Nobody is forcing Obama to take the tax cuts.  He can write a check to the IRS for any amount he wishes as a gift in addition to the tax he owes.  Who believes he will do this?


Obama trotted out the same class warfare talking points.


Obama said Trump is “cozying up” to Putin.  Obama and Hillary approved the sale of 20% of our uranium to Putin’s Russia, but this isn’t “cozying up.”


Obama cannot accept that Trump is dismantling Obama’s legacy.  Trump canceled the Iran sellout deal, where Obama gave Iran 150 billion dollars, plus billions in cash, and Trump is applying sanctions against Iran.  Trump has rejected the Paris Climate Accord, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which the N.Y. Times called “Obama’s Signature Trade Deal.”


Obama knows that Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed as a Supreme Court justice and that Kavanaugh was brilliant in the hearings, making the Dem senators look foolish.


Unlike Obama, Trump does not apologize for American power.  Trump is proud of our country.


The bottom line is that Obama is angry.  He did all he could to defeat Trump and elect Hillary.  His corrupt FBI/DOJ whitewashed the Hillary email scandal and used the unverified, Hillary-paid-for Steele dossier to obtain FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign, which led to the Mueller investigation.  But Obama’s efforts failed to elect Hillary.


Further, a grand jury is investigating Andrew McCabe, the second in command at the Obama FBI.


Obama knows that this investigation will lead to Comey; his A.G., Lynch; Hillary; and ultimately himself.  The major players in the Obama FBI and DOJ will be investigated.


Obama failed to defeat Trump.  He is angry and desperate and will campaign to elect enough Dems in the November election to impeach Trump.  Obama’s campaigning will have the same success as his campaign to elect Hillary.


Image: Ari Levinson via Wikimedia Commons.


On September 7, Barack Obama gave a speech in Illinois bitterly attacking President Trump and talking about his favorite subjects: himself and slavery.


Obama is angry.  He called on his followers to get out and vote in November to defeat Trump.  He is angry that the voters rejected him in 2016 by electing Trump instead of Hillary.  He knows that this was a rejection of his policies, and more importantly, it was a rejection of Obama personally.  Obama cannot accept this.  He and Joe Biden campaigned for Hillary daily, and Obama even said he would take it as a personal insult if black voters didn’t vote for Hillary.


Black voters and Hispanic voters ignored Obama’s orders. Trump got more black and Hispanic voters than Romney in 2012.


Obama cannot stand the success of President Trump.  The economy is booming, the stock market is booming, and unemployment is down, but Obama does not care that our country is doing well.  Obama has to give a speech to again try to divide us.


Obama went so far as to claim that the economy is doing well because of his policies.  He cannot accept that Trump turned around the weak Obama economy.   If he really believes this, he is delusional.


Obama said he does not need the Trump tax cuts.  Nobody is forcing Obama to take the tax cuts.  He can write a check to the IRS for any amount he wishes as a gift in addition to the tax he owes.  Who believes he will do this?


Obama trotted out the same class warfare talking points.


Obama said Trump is “cozying up” to Putin.  Obama and Hillary approved the sale of 20% of our uranium to Putin’s Russia, but this isn’t “cozying up.”


Obama cannot accept that Trump is dismantling Obama’s legacy.  Trump canceled the Iran sellout deal, where Obama gave Iran 150 billion dollars, plus billions in cash, and Trump is applying sanctions against Iran.  Trump has rejected the Paris Climate Accord, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which the N.Y. Times called “Obama’s Signature Trade Deal.”


Obama knows that Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed as a Supreme Court justice and that Kavanaugh was brilliant in the hearings, making the Dem senators look foolish.


Unlike Obama, Trump does not apologize for American power.  Trump is proud of our country.


The bottom line is that Obama is angry.  He did all he could to defeat Trump and elect Hillary.  His corrupt FBI/DOJ whitewashed the Hillary email scandal and used the unverified, Hillary-paid-for Steele dossier to obtain FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign, which led to the Mueller investigation.  But Obama’s efforts failed to elect Hillary.


Further, a grand jury is investigating Andrew McCabe, the second in command at the Obama FBI.


Obama knows that this investigation will lead to Comey; his A.G., Lynch; Hillary; and ultimately himself.  The major players in the Obama FBI and DOJ will be investigated.


Obama failed to defeat Trump.  He is angry and desperate and will campaign to elect enough Dems in the November election to impeach Trump.  Obama’s campaigning will have the same success as his campaign to elect Hillary.


Image: Ari Levinson via Wikimedia Commons.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Obama’s bitter sore spot: The Trump economy


Back on center stage and partisan as ever, President Obama leaped back into politics Friday with a stemwinder stump speech on behalf of his fellow Democrats, declaring Democrats the fount of all progress, bringing up his favorite hobbyhorses, and, most notably, blasting Trump for his economy…before saying the economy was all his.


I think we know what Obama’s sore spot is now.



His whole speech shows he has no idea how economies work.  According to the Daily Caller citing the speech:


Obama mentioned the financial crisis at the beginning of his term saying “When I came into office in 2009 we were losing 800,000 jobs a month.”


“Millions of people were losing their homes.  Many were worried we were entering into a second Great Depression.  So we worked hard to end that crisis but also to break some of these longer-term trends,” Obama said, “And initiated the longest streak of job creation on record.  We covered another 20 million Americans with health insurance and we cut our deficits by more than half, partly by making sure people like me who have been given such amazing opportunities by this country, pay our fair share of taxes, to help folks coming up behind us.”


“I mention all this just so when you hear how great the economy is doing right now, let’s just remember when this recovery started,” Obama then said, “I’m glad it’s continued but when you hear about this economic miracle that’s been going on, when the job numbers come out, monthly job numbers, suddenly Republicans are saying ‘It’s a miracle.’  I have to remind them, actually, those job numbers are the same as they were in 2015 and 2016.”


According to The Hill:


The former president tore into Trump and the Republicans for offering tax cuts to wealthy Americans, while neglecting the impact that the reduced duties would have on the nation’s deficit.


“With Republicans in control of Congress and the White House, without any checks or balances whatsoever, they’ve provided another $1.5 trillion in tax cuts to people like me, who I promise don’t need it, and don’t even pretend to pay for them,” Obama said.


“It’s supposed to be the party supposedly of fiscal conservatism,” he continued.  ”Suddenly deficits do not matter.”


…and…


Obama also suggested Trump gets too much credit for the soaring economy and that not enough credit is given to his administration by Republicans.


What makes this whole thing pathetic is that Trump really is governing differently compared with how Obama governed.


Trump gave us tax cuts, deregulation, and an equalization of international trade terms.  Net result: Jobs are up, and black employment is reaching record highs, as is youth, Hispanic, and female employment.  Those 3% unemployment numbers are good news for everyone.


Instead of admitting that and promising to go Trump one better the next time around, Obama described this tired scenario going on, as if it were still 2008:


For those with unique skills or access to technology and capital, a global market has meant unprecedented wealth.  For those not so lucky, for the factory worker, for the office worker, or even middle managers, those same forces may have wiped out your job, or at least put you in no position to ask for a raise.  As wages slowed and inequality accelerated, those at the top of the economic pyramid have been able to influence government to skew things even more in their direction: cutting taxes on the wealthiest Americans, unwinding regulations and weakening worker protections, shrinking the safety net.  So you have come of age during a time of growing inequality, of fracturing of economic opportunity.


Poor fella.  He still lives in the past.


Likely that’s because, on some level, he can’t reconcile what is happening now with his own sorry, sorry economic record.


Obama failed to consider the economy important at all during his two terms, and as for jobs, well, all we heard was that some politically connected cronies were getting “green jobs.”  As for industrial private-sector jobs, “those jobs aren’t coming back.”  He was so neglectful of the economy during his eight long years in office that the only logical conclusion one can deduce from it was that he didn’t want a good economy.


Instead of any serious moves on the economy – he didn’t even bust the fast-buck bankers who triggered the 2008 meltdown – he focused on a trillion-dollar stimulus, driving up the massive U.S. debt load, which only ended up bailing out failing city government pensions.  His economic plan focused on welfare-shoveling for “poverty alleviation,” as if redistributed money actually creates wealth.  He focused on centrally planned “green jobs” and subsidized unsustainable green energy schemes, leaving the landscape littered with bird Cuisinarts when the cash ran out.  He favored bailouts of failing industries such as the auto industry yet also imposed impossible-to-fulfill green mandates on fuel efficiency on these same automakers.  He had some cold spots for the coal and oil industries, drawing a rebuke from a federal judge for his illegal ban on drilling (while promising to buy oil instead from Brazil) and only late and desperately claiming credit for the fracking revolution, which came despite, not because of, his administration.  He was also all in for imposing occasional aimless punitive tariffs to please Big Labor, and he delayed critical strategic free trade pacts with allies such as Colombia and South Korea.  All industries where people work with their hands – whether farms, fisheries, timber, or mines – were his targets.  He damaged the workforce by allowing millions of unchecked, unvetted illegal immigrants into the country to drive down wages and bring in opiates, which had a devastating impact on the heartland.  As for jobs, the jobs Obama created were government bureaucrat jobs, siccing the regulators onto the producers and padding up the welfare bureaucrats to extend handouts to the non-producers.  On his watch, the Washington, D.C. suburbs grew fat and wealthy, while the rest of the country, grotesquely taxed and regulated, as well as demonized as “the rich,” fell into shambles.


Obama during his terms repeatedly dismissed tax cuts, which a Republican Congress put in front of him and he refused to so much as consider.  He’s still spouting the line that tax cuts all go to the rich, and he claims there is no connection among the Trump tax cuts, the falling black, Hispanic, youth, and female employment rates.  And that 4.2% GDP boom, coming up in the second year of President Trump’s administration?  He says that’s his.


It’s such garbage.


Note also that he still believes the same tired leftist canard that if you cut taxes, you will run deficits because taxpayer behavior never responds to incentives.  Investor’s Business Daily, which is the expert on these matters, notes that tax receipts went up 9% for the government as the U.S. economy boomed.  That’s bad news for Obama’s beliefs, but hasn’t stopped his lies.


Here’s the hard reality: Obama could have had Trump’s economy if he had signed on to tax cuts.  One wonders if it eats at him that he didn’t.  Like any Democrat, he thinks tax cuts are a “scam” because he thinks allowing people to control their own money is a bad thing, and all of their moneys are his.  Yet the economy is an “it” – it’s not a partisan thing. It behaves exactly the same way whether a Republican cuts the taxes or a Democrat cuts the taxes.  It simply goes up.  Want an economy to improve, cut taxes.  This isn’t complicated.


He failed.  And President Trump’s amazing success, that success that may well propel a red wave come November if voters want to keep things like this has got to eat at him as he feebly insists that the economy is all his.


This is wretched.  What a nasty, bitter little man, trying to take credit for an economy he never understood.  What we are seeing here is a big reason why Republican voters must go to the polls in November.  Obama’s sorry record and miserable self-justification is providing the reason.


Image credit: YouTube screenshot.


Back on center stage and partisan as ever, President Obama leaped back into politics Friday with a stemwinder stump speech on behalf of his fellow Democrats, declaring Democrats the fount of all progress, bringing up his favorite hobbyhorses, and, most notably, blasting Trump for his economy…before saying the economy was all his.


I think we know what Obama’s sore spot is now.


His whole speech shows he has no idea how economies work.  According to the Daily Caller citing the speech:


Obama mentioned the financial crisis at the beginning of his term saying “When I came into office in 2009 we were losing 800,000 jobs a month.”


“Millions of people were losing their homes.  Many were worried we were entering into a second Great Depression.  So we worked hard to end that crisis but also to break some of these longer-term trends,” Obama said, “And initiated the longest streak of job creation on record.  We covered another 20 million Americans with health insurance and we cut our deficits by more than half, partly by making sure people like me who have been given such amazing opportunities by this country, pay our fair share of taxes, to help folks coming up behind us.”


“I mention all this just so when you hear how great the economy is doing right now, let’s just remember when this recovery started,” Obama then said, “I’m glad it’s continued but when you hear about this economic miracle that’s been going on, when the job numbers come out, monthly job numbers, suddenly Republicans are saying ‘It’s a miracle.’  I have to remind them, actually, those job numbers are the same as they were in 2015 and 2016.”


According to The Hill:


The former president tore into Trump and the Republicans for offering tax cuts to wealthy Americans, while neglecting the impact that the reduced duties would have on the nation’s deficit.


“With Republicans in control of Congress and the White House, without any checks or balances whatsoever, they’ve provided another $1.5 trillion in tax cuts to people like me, who I promise don’t need it, and don’t even pretend to pay for them,” Obama said.


“It’s supposed to be the party supposedly of fiscal conservatism,” he continued.  ”Suddenly deficits do not matter.”


…and…


Obama also suggested Trump gets too much credit for the soaring economy and that not enough credit is given to his administration by Republicans.


What makes this whole thing pathetic is that Trump really is governing differently compared with how Obama governed.


Trump gave us tax cuts, deregulation, and an equalization of international trade terms.  Net result: Jobs are up, and black employment is reaching record highs, as is youth, Hispanic, and female employment.  Those 3% unemployment numbers are good news for everyone.


Instead of admitting that and promising to go Trump one better the next time around, Obama described this tired scenario going on, as if it were still 2008:


For those with unique skills or access to technology and capital, a global market has meant unprecedented wealth.  For those not so lucky, for the factory worker, for the office worker, or even middle managers, those same forces may have wiped out your job, or at least put you in no position to ask for a raise.  As wages slowed and inequality accelerated, those at the top of the economic pyramid have been able to influence government to skew things even more in their direction: cutting taxes on the wealthiest Americans, unwinding regulations and weakening worker protections, shrinking the safety net.  So you have come of age during a time of growing inequality, of fracturing of economic opportunity.


Poor fella.  He still lives in the past.


Likely that’s because, on some level, he can’t reconcile what is happening now with his own sorry, sorry economic record.


Obama failed to consider the economy important at all during his two terms, and as for jobs, well, all we heard was that some politically connected cronies were getting “green jobs.”  As for industrial private-sector jobs, “those jobs aren’t coming back.”  He was so neglectful of the economy during his eight long years in office that the only logical conclusion one can deduce from it was that he didn’t want a good economy.


Instead of any serious moves on the economy – he didn’t even bust the fast-buck bankers who triggered the 2008 meltdown – he focused on a trillion-dollar stimulus, driving up the massive U.S. debt load, which only ended up bailing out failing city government pensions.  His economic plan focused on welfare-shoveling for “poverty alleviation,” as if redistributed money actually creates wealth.  He focused on centrally planned “green jobs” and subsidized unsustainable green energy schemes, leaving the landscape littered with bird Cuisinarts when the cash ran out.  He favored bailouts of failing industries such as the auto industry yet also imposed impossible-to-fulfill green mandates on fuel efficiency on these same automakers.  He had some cold spots for the coal and oil industries, drawing a rebuke from a federal judge for his illegal ban on drilling (while promising to buy oil instead from Brazil) and only late and desperately claiming credit for the fracking revolution, which came despite, not because of, his administration.  He was also all in for imposing occasional aimless punitive tariffs to please Big Labor, and he delayed critical strategic free trade pacts with allies such as Colombia and South Korea.  All industries where people work with their hands – whether farms, fisheries, timber, or mines – were his targets.  He damaged the workforce by allowing millions of unchecked, unvetted illegal immigrants into the country to drive down wages and bring in opiates, which had a devastating impact on the heartland.  As for jobs, the jobs Obama created were government bureaucrat jobs, siccing the regulators onto the producers and padding up the welfare bureaucrats to extend handouts to the non-producers.  On his watch, the Washington, D.C. suburbs grew fat and wealthy, while the rest of the country, grotesquely taxed and regulated, as well as demonized as “the rich,” fell into shambles.


Obama during his terms repeatedly dismissed tax cuts, which a Republican Congress put in front of him and he refused to so much as consider.  He’s still spouting the line that tax cuts all go to the rich, and he claims there is no connection among the Trump tax cuts, the falling black, Hispanic, youth, and female employment rates.  And that 4.2% GDP boom, coming up in the second year of President Trump’s administration?  He says that’s his.


It’s such garbage.


Note also that he still believes the same tired leftist canard that if you cut taxes, you will run deficits because taxpayer behavior never responds to incentives.  Investor’s Business Daily, which is the expert on these matters, notes that tax receipts went up 9% for the government as the U.S. economy boomed.  That’s bad news for Obama’s beliefs, but hasn’t stopped his lies.


Here’s the hard reality: Obama could have had Trump’s economy if he had signed on to tax cuts.  One wonders if it eats at him that he didn’t.  Like any Democrat, he thinks tax cuts are a “scam” because he thinks allowing people to control their own money is a bad thing, and all of their moneys are his.  Yet the economy is an “it” – it’s not a partisan thing. It behaves exactly the same way whether a Republican cuts the taxes or a Democrat cuts the taxes.  It simply goes up.  Want an economy to improve, cut taxes.  This isn’t complicated.


He failed.  And President Trump’s amazing success, that success that may well propel a red wave come November if voters want to keep things like this has got to eat at him as he feebly insists that the economy is all his.


This is wretched.  What a nasty, bitter little man, trying to take credit for an economy he never understood.  What we are seeing here is a big reason why Republican voters must go to the polls in November.  Obama’s sorry record and miserable self-justification is providing the reason.


Image credit: YouTube screenshot.




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Klein: Evidence Mounting of Trump Tower Collusion… Against Don Jr.

NEW YORK — Multiple recent Breitbart News investigations into the infamous brief meeting at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016 between individuals tied to Russia, Donald Trump Jr. and other campaign officials point to the increasing likelihood of the confab being set up as a dirty trick against Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

WATCH: Obama calls Benghazi attack a ‘wild conspiracy theory.’ Benghazi hero decimates him.

Former President Barack Obama was in mid-season form on Friday when he launched a broadside against President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans at the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign.

One attack in particular earned the scorn of Kris Paronto, one of the heroes of Benghazi.

What did Obama say?

Obama suggested that outrage over the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi — which resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens — was the result of Republican “conspiracy theories.”

“But over the past few decades, the politics of division and resentment and paranoia has unfortunately found a home in the Republican party,” Obama said.

The former president accused the Republican-controlled Congress of “unwinding campaign finance laws,” “systematically [attacking] voter rights,” implementing tax cuts “without regard to deficits,” “slashing the safety net,” and casting votes to “take away health insurance from ordinary Americans.”

Obama then charged that Republicans in Congress have “embraced wild conspiracy theories, like those surrounding Benghazi.”

In actuality, Republicans in Congress, though they pursued the truth behind the attack with tenacity, did not push conspiracy theories during the Benghazi investigations. It was the Obama administration that blamed the attack on a YouTube video, which was later proved categorically false.

How did Paronto respond?

The former U.S. Army Ranger — who worked as a CIA security contractor to protect the CIA’s Benghazi annex saving countless lives during the coordinated terrorist attack — had strong words for Obama.

Paronto’s tweet received widespread attention, garnering nearly 60,000 “likes” as of Saturday afternoon.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

Army Veteran’s Apparel Line Counters Nike-Kaepernick Campaign with ‘Just Stand’ Shirt


Nike is down across all demographics.

Via Fox News Insider:

An Army veteran called out Nike Saturday on Fox & Friends for featuring Colin Kaepernick at the center of the company’s “Just Do It” campaign.

Tyler Merritt’s company, Nine Line Apparel, has countered Nike by releasing a shirt of its own that reads “Just Stand.”

Merritt, a former Army captain and Nine Line’s CEO, said Saturday, “They decided to take a stance. This is our stand.”

Nike recently announced a multiyear agreement with Kaepernick, including for his own apparel line, video ads and billboards featuring his image, and a contribution to the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback’s Know Your Rights charity.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us