The Modern Democratic Party: 2020 Candidate Throws Support Behind ‘Third Gender’ at Federal Level

Presidential races never shape up the way you think they’re going to.

For instance, at this moment in time back in 2015, we were all talking about how Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio were going to be duking it out for the Republican nomination.

That being said, the official wisdom for the Democrat nomination in 2020 is that Joe Biden will be sucking up all the air in the establishment and Bernie Sanders will have solidified the socialist segment of the party, so the key is staking out a position somewhere on the not-quite-socialist identity politics left.

The problem is that’s a crowded market segment. Democrat Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Kirsten Gillibrand — all of whom fit in that political niche — have already declared their intentions to run. And then there’s Beto O’Rourke — an insanely rich, insanely privileged white guy the Democrats still seem to believe is an identity politics hero because he livestreams himself skateboarding an awful lot, or something — who will probably end up in the race, too.

How, then, to differentiate one’s brand in such a crowded field?

TRENDING: Epic: Trump Just Used Twitter To Send Calif. Gov. Newsom a Bill for $3.5 Billion

Elizabeth Warren has called for an “ultra-millionaire tax” which is probably unconstitutional and a bad idea even if it weren’t.

Kamala Harris seems to be on board for doing something about legalizing marijuana at the national level, telling interviewers, according to Politico, that “it gives a lot of people joy. And we need more joy.”

Cory Booker has been talking about his vegan diet as if it were an actual campaign issue, even though he swears “whatever you eat is a very personal decision and everybody should what eat what they want to eat.”

So, taxing the heck out of the rich is taken. Cory Booker and Kamala Harris have both taken plant advocacy off the table, albeit in very different ways. What’s left for Kirsten Gillibrand?

Well, how about endorsing the legal recognition of a third gender classification at the federal level?

“New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a 2020 candidate, endorsed federal implementation of a third gender listing for Americans who identify as non-binary. Speaking at an LGBTQ-focused meet and greet in New Hampshire on Friday, Gillibrand emphatically said ‘yes’ about recognizing ‘X’ as a third gender marker,” CBS News reported.

“Palana Belken, a transgender woman and organizer for the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire, asked Gillibrand the question and applauded her quick answer.”

The ball’s in your court now, Kamala.

RELATED: Second Apparently Racist Yearbook Page Surfaces as Things Go from Bad to Worse for Northam

The “X” identification is currently available in a number of states as well as individual cities, but no move has been made to implement it on a federal level.

“Belken said her question originated from the efforts of New Hampshire State Rep. Gerri Cannon, a transgender lawmaker who recently introduced two similar identification bills at the state level to present this third option on birth certificates and driver’s licenses,” CBS News continued.

Cannon believes federal recognition is important because of confusion involving what the “X” means when traveling in other states.

“Right now, especially non-binary people, when they go to one state to another, some state trooper may take a look at a license with an ‘X’ on it and go, ‘What is this?’” Cannon said.

Should the federal government recognize a third gender?

First, let’s state the obvious: There’s not a particularly large body of science that proves identifying as non-binary is in any way biological. While there’s an incredibly small number of individuals who are born with intersex traits, that’s definitely not what this is addressing.

Instead, this is mostly about individuals who identify as a sex different from the one they were born — people who claim they’re demigender, third-gender, genderfluid, whatever the case may be. Nobody particularly has to care about this third-gender identification in almost any other aspect of life. When dealing with the government, however, these individuals are either biologically male or female. Putting an X on their driver’s license doesn’t change this very salient fact.

But that isn’t really the point, is it? For the segment of the Democrat field that Sen. Gillibrand finds herself in, the next few months will look increasingly like a leftist political version of “Survivor.”

If all of the aforementioned candidates stay in the race, you’re pretty much guaranteed to see a Biden-Sanders showdown with almost none of these individuals having a shot.

As The Hiill reported Friday, a new poll by the Morning Consult shows that those two men are not only the most popular potential Democratic contenders for 2020 (29 percent of Democrats for Biden, 22 percent for Sanders), but each is backed by the other’s supporters as a second choice. That means they have support that’s both wide and deep.

So, for one of the non-Biden-Sanders candidates to be viable, the others need to get voted off the island. If you want immunity, you need to get yourself noticed, and the best way to do that is conspicuously getting behind something the left will love. Massive taxes! Lettuce! Hippie lettuce! A third gender!

If your pet issue doesn’t catch on, well, the tribe has spoken.

All of this nonsense will either be inconsequential to or deleterious for most of us, mind you. In Gillibrand’s case, I don’t think that individuals who choose to identify as something other than a man or a woman are going to be profoundly validated by seeing an “X” on their driver’s license. In the meantime, we’ll have committed our government to supporting an unscientific-yet-trendy gender movement.

Perhaps most telling is the fact that this idea would have been considered insanely radical just five years ago.

Now we have Gillibrand — arguably the most vanilla of the candidates jockeying to be the not-Biden-not-Sanders torch-bearer — supporting this without a second thought.  In fact, if any Democratic candidates disagreed with this, you can imagine the political firestorm they’d find themselves in. Such is the state of the Democrats in 2019, a party which is more concerned with third genders than the security of the United States.

With all of this posturing, I can’t wait to see what the next few weeks bring.

Kamala Harris livestreaming herself smoking some “joy?” Cory Booker announcing his support for massive kale subsidies, calling it the Very Green New Deal? Beto O’Rourke entering the race and declaring, in a Vermin Supreme-esque move, that he’s going to give everyone a free skateboard? The imagination reels at the possibilities.

Presidential races are unpredictable, of course, and I can’t tell you who the winner will be, but  among the losers will be a) common sense and b) America.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Creepy Joe Biden Goes to Europe and Trashes America, Says Our Nation is an ‘Embarrassment’

Creepy former-Vice President Joe Biden spoke at the NATO Munich Security Conference on Saturday and called the United States an “embarrassment.”

Speaking to European allies, Biden trashed America with an open hostility, violating the unspoken tradition of leaving political gripes at home when speaking in foreign nations.

“The America I see values basic human decency, not snatching children from their parents or turning our back on refugees at our border. Americans know that’s not right,” Biden asserted. “The American people understand plainly that this makes us an embarrassment. The American people know, overwhelmingly, that it is not right. That it is not who we are.”

Biden has not ruled out running for president — and is seen as a favorite to win the nomination by pollsters.

“While I cannot speak today as an elected government official who is able to set policy, I can speak as a citizen. I can offer insight into my country. I know we’ve heard a lot today about leadership, but in my experience, leadership only exists if somebody — and others — are with you. Leadership in the absence of people who are with you is not leadership,” Biden continued.

The 76-year-old added that it is wrong “to disagree with your brothers and sisters in public. Today because of, I think, a lack of leadership coming from the other side of the Atlantic, we find ourselves in a different place, and it’s uncomfortable.”

“I can assure you, that the American people, the ultimate wellspring of power in the United States of America, remain committed to engaging the world with decency and respect,” Biden said.

The post Creepy Joe Biden Goes to Europe and Trashes America, Says Our Nation is an ‘Embarrassment’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

HIDE YOUR CHILDREN: Sexual Predator Anthony Weiner Released From Federal Prison

Disgraced former Rep. Anthony Weiner has been released from prison and placed in a residential re-entry facility. He had been sentenced to 21 months in prison for sending sexually explicit messages to a minor.

Weiner had been sending graphic and sexually explicit messages to a 15-year-old North Carolina girl in 2017.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons has Weiner listed as being in the custody of a Residential Re-entry Management office in Brooklyn, New York, according to a report from the Associated Press.

The investigation into his chats with the girl led to a laptop being seized from the home Weiner shared with his wife Huma Abedin, a top aide to Hillary Clinton. Two weeks before the election, FBI Director James Comey announced that emails related to the candidate’s private email server may have been found on a laptop used by both Weiner and Abedin, prompting the agency to reopen their probe into the scandal.

Weiner’s predatory messages to the teen were not his first sex scandal.

In 2011, Weiner tweeted a photo of his crotch, which lead to his resignation from Congress.

During his run for mayor of New York, Weiner’s weiner made headlines once again after porn star Sydney Leathers went to the media with their explicit chats.

During the 2016 election season, the New York Post obtained new graphic chats between Weiner and a “busty brunette,” including a photo of his crotch — taken with his five-year-old son sleeping in the bed in the background.

Weiner’s wife Huma Abedin has worked closely with Clinton since the 1990s, during Bill Clinton’s presidency. She has been a top aide to the former First Lady ever since.

Weiner’s sexual scandals were chronicled in a now-popular documentary called Weiner, in which Abedin’s contempt for him was impossible to miss.

The post HIDE YOUR CHILDREN: Sexual Predator Anthony Weiner Released From Federal Prison appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Hamas Claims Israel Sent Bugged Shoes To Spy On The Terrorist Group…

And Hamas fell for it. Via JPost: A Fatah breakaway group in the Gaza Strip claimed its members have intercepted a shipment of military boots equipped with “secret electronic tracking chips,” that were on their way to market, according to a Palestinian news source. Hamas: Israel sent us shoes equipped with secret electronic tracking chips […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

TRUMP Calls for Investigation into Rigged, Liberal Channels That Constantly Spew Hatred at Republicans

It’s no secret that the media is liberal.

Last night, “Saturday Night Live” opened with another anti-Trump skit with Alec Baldwin impersonating Trump’s Rose Garden presser where he announced he was declaring a national emergency to secure funding for the southern border.

Alec Baldwin called the national emergency “fake” and mocked the drug and opioid crisis gripping the nation due to porous borders.

“You all see why I gotta fake this emergency, right? I have to because I want to. It’s really simple. We have a problem. Drugs are coming into this country through no wall,” Baldwin said.

Baldwin continued: “Wall works, wall makes safe. You don’t have to be smart to understand that, in fact it’s even easier to understand if you’re not that smart.”

The anti-Trump skits by Alec Baldwin are old and tired, but the ‘get Trump’ media won’t stop until the president is removed from office.

President Trump called for an investigation into rigged, liberal media networks.

TRUMP: Nothing funny about tired Saturday Night Live on Fake News NBC! Question is, how do the Networks get away with these total Republican hit jobs without retribution? Likewise for many other shows? Very unfair and should be looked into. This is the real Collusion!

Trump slammed the media again, calling them the enemy of the people in a follow up tweet.

The post TRUMP Calls for Investigation into Rigged, Liberal Channels That Constantly Spew Hatred at Republicans appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Game Over: Chicago Police Believe Jussie Smollett Paid Two Brothers To Stage Attack

Even CNN is finally reporting on it now. Via Daily Mail: Empire star Jussie Smollett paid two men to stage an assault against him which he later claimed was an attack motivated by racism and homophobia, investigators in Chicago now believe. The two men involved in the alleged hoax are now fully cooperating with law […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

KLAVAN: Is Trump Playing A Long Game On The Border?

There is an ongoing debate among right-leaning thinkers. How smart — or stupid — is Donald Trump? Is he some barely animate idiot bouncing around like a Pachinko ball, hitting upon occasional success at random? Or is he the orange version of Mr. Spock, playing multi-dimensional chess with Earthlings who simply cannot comprehend his genius?

I tend to come down in the middle of this question. Trump doesn’t strike me as the deepest thinker in the world. But a guy who changed the skyline of New York when everyone else was abandoning the sinking leftist ship, who fronted a hit TV show for nearly a decade and a half, and who made the geniuses of political commentary look like monkeys by winning the White House, may be many things, but he’s not just lucky.

I compare Trump to a great running back, a man who knows where political daylight is without even thinking about it. He’s a gut guy. Brain guys despise gut guys, but an awful lot of brain guys end up working for gut guys because the gut guys sense things what the brain guys are too smart to observe. That’s Trump.

In keeping with this theory, I notice that Trump does something important that a lot of the people observing him never do. He changes. He adapts. He finds new ways to daylight. Because the people who observe him don’t do this — because they have their ideas and they stick to them and crunch the facts to fit them — this tactic is invisible to them. They think he’s always acting the same way, and he’s just not.

So I wonder: is Trump losing the battle over border security as badly as it seems he is? Or is he playing the sort of long game no one ever expects of him? Not three-dimensional chess exactly. Let’s call it Patience.

His emphasis on the caravan and border security during the mid-terms did not serve him well. The people voted the map — they went the way you would expect them to go in their states and districts. That means that all the talk about criminals invading our country excited the usual Trump supporters, but did not expand the base the way smart politics should.

In the aftermath, Trump started leaning hard on the wall at a time when it was nigh on impossible he was going to get much of what he wanted. The government shutdown went badly for him. Pelosi won everything, Trump nothing. The new bill to keep the government funded seems pretty much more of the same. And Trump’s declaration of a national emergency has conservatives (like me) very worried that the president is extending executive power beyond the proper bounds and giving the Democrats an excuse to do the same the next time they’re in power. No matter what the diehard Trump-bots say, this is not the typical national emergency and it does not seem to me like a good idea.

However. On the flip side of this, I can’t help noticing that since the mid-terms, Trump has been different. He’s been less, well, Trumpy. Less visible. More restrained. His border security speech from the Oval Office was solid. His offers to negotiate have been fair. His State of the Union was excellent. Even his recent rally in El Paso was less belligerent than the norm. The insults (Beto has nothing going for him but a great first name) were smarter, less childish, less cruel. He remains his essentially pugilistic self, but he’s also been — forgive the cliché — more presidential.

Meanwhile, the Democrats have unleashed a Green New Deal that is a blueprint for ending American freedom and prosperity. They have allowed the bubble-headed Alexandria Occasio-Cortez and the vicious Ilhan Omar to seize the headlines with their ignorance and racism. Virginia is an intersectional clown show that even the news media can’t bury. And new revelations out of the Justice Department give credence to Trump’s repeated charges that he is the victim of an unconstitutional Deep State witch hunt.

I cannot believe I’m saying this, but right this minute, Donald Trump is coming across like the grown-up in the room, the all-American man of practical sense beleaguered by raving ideological incompetents.

Is that just luck, or is it part of a new strategy: the long game?

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Report: Border Patrol Museum in El Paso Attacked by Protesters; Memorial to Fallen Agents Vandalized

There is an unconfirmed report from El Paso, Texas, that the National Border Patrol Museum was attacked by protesters on Saturday. A poster on Twitter, whose report about the attack was retweeted by a Texas Border Patrol union account, stated the protesters attacked every exhibit at the museum including the Memorial Room dedicated to agents who gave their lives in the line of duty. The poster, Gloria Ham, appears to be current or former Border Patrol by her use of the word “our” to describe the attack. Ham’s account states she is in El Paso. In some tweets she states she is a federal employee. Ham copied President Trump, his son Don, Jr., and Dan Bongino on her tweets.

“Today a group of protesters invaded the Border Patrol Museum and defaced all of the exhibits honoring our history including our sacred Memorial Room. These patriots died in the line of duty. Efforts to prosecute them will be pursued.”

“Today a group of protesters invaded the Border Patrol Museum and defaced all of the exhibits honoring our history including our sacred Memorial Room. These patriots died in the line of duty. Disgrace to decency.”

The Border Patrol union account, Border Patrol RGVTX @rgv3307, posted in reply to Ham, “Our Agency’s history and legacy is shared through those doors, and the memories of our fallen Agents are told through the BP Museum’s Memorial Room.”

The museum has not reported the attack on its website, nor has any mention been made on its Twitter or Facebook accounts. The last Facebook post was early Saturday morning.

Good Morning….Just a quick reminder folks…We are not federally funded…We are a non-profit museum so donations,…

Posted by U.S. Border Patrol Museum on Saturday, February 16, 2019

A recent photo of the exterior of the museum.

Good Morning Folks…We are back for another year…We believe that 2019 will be even a better year for the museum…So…

Posted by U.S. Border Patrol Museum on Wednesday, January 2, 2019

Recent Gloria Ham tweets stating her background and support for President Trump.

A call to the El Paso police PIO Saturday night was not returned as of publication of this article. Nor was a request for comment from Gloria Ham replied to.

UPDATE: Another El Paso based account states the attackers were with Occupy Tornillo, a radical open borders group holding a long weekend of protests in El Paso from the 14th through the 18th.

PRESS ADVISORY FOR IMMEDIATE RELASE February, 14th 2019 Activists with Tornillo: The Occupation launch of their…

Posted by Tornillo: The Occupation on Thursday, February 14, 2019

Excerpt:

“While the group has called for disruptive Nonviolent Direct Actions at detention centers, and ICE field offices, across the nation, in solidarity with the Weekend of Revolutionary Love, Tornillo: The Occupation will focus its weekend efforts on the Tornillo/El Paso area.

“The El Paso region is ground zero for a corrupt and broke immigration system, there are many detention centers that are operating with impunity and are largely unnoticed. This weekend aims to continue the spread of a culture of resistance in El Paso, and across the nation.” Elizabeth Vega, organizer Tornillo: The Occupation.”

The post Report: Border Patrol Museum in El Paso Attacked by Protesters; Memorial to Fallen Agents Vandalized appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Prager on AOC Push to Reject Amazon HQ2: ‘Leftism Is an Emotion — It’s Not a Position’

Saturday on Fox News Channel’s “Justice,” conservative radio talker Dennis Prager explained how Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and her efforts to fight Amazon’s now-canceled plans to put a headquarters in New York City was emblematic of leftism’s obsession with equality.

Prager called “leftism” an emotion and not a position.

“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a good example of the left since Marx,” he said. “This is not new. They are not liberals. They are leftists. For the left, the love of idea is much greater than the love of people. That 25,000 people would have jobs, good-paying jobs, that massive numbers of workers in Long Island City and environs would benefit from Amazon coming there is of no consequence to them. They care about corporate greed, not about bettering the life of human beings. In the name of equality, people don’t realize how much evil has been done. This is a little example.”

Prager cited the French Revolution, Venezuela, and the Soviet Union as examples where the ideal is more important than human beings.

“[L]eftism is an emotion,” Prager added. “It’s not a position. And so, they so loathe that anybody is richer than anyone else that it is better that everyone suffer at a low level than everyone be improved, but there still be much richer people. They live the idea of the violation because I think in biblical terms, often, of the Tenth Commandment: Don’t covet what belongs to someone else. The left is based on coveting. They loathe the idea that [Amazon CEO Jeff] Bezos is rich. I can’t stand Bezos. But I don’t loathe that he’s a billionaire. It is irrelevant to me. The question is, will he do good by bringing business to my city. The answer is an unequivocal yes.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Stop Sneering at Evangelicals for Supporting Trump

The religious left is still looking down on conservative Christian peons for supporting imperfect, feisty Trump.  Throughout social media and elsewhere, the left accuses us of compromising our faith and standards.


Prof. Randall Balmer of Dartmouth University recently posted an opinion piece at the Los Angeles Times with the ironic title “God Is on Team Trump? Let’s take a quick check with the Bible.” The sarcasm is seen when God is on Trump’s team, not the other way around. Then he proceeds to dismantle — at least in his mind — evangelical support for Trump.



He starts off with more sarcasm that God put his thumb on the scale of the election, so that Trump barely won and only by the Electoral College. Some victory for God! In reply, just because we cannot figure out the details of how God works in an ocean of humanity does not mean God does not have his purposes and works them out. Prof. Balmer seems to assume that if a victory is not a landslide, then God was not at work. Since he wrote a book about evangelicals, he must know that some of them with a more prophetic gifting predicted long before the November 2016 elections that Trump’s victory would stun the world. It did.  


Next, Prof. Balmer tackles immigration and summarized some verses in Leviticus and one in the epistle to the Hebrews (since Heb. 13:2 is talking about household hospitality — not on a national scale — and the possibility that an angel could be a guest without our knowledge, let’s skip past his wrenching that verse out of context). It is difficult to find mass migration in the ancient world, but let’s assume that millions and millions of immigrants moved into ancient Israel in 20-30 years. And let’s assume that a certain percentage of them raped and assaulted women and children at the border and transported some sort of ancient, mind-altering drugs. Yes, protect the innocent, but there would be nothing wrong with building a wall back then, much as Israel has done today, to good effect. Obama and other Democrats in the past have said there was a crisis at the border. And there is nothing immoral with securing our borders today with a wall or updating the one that is already there. In any case, these are two different contexts, so let’s move on.


Then Balmer brings up separating children from their parents at the border. Yes, it happened, but it is a sure thing that he knew that under the Obama administration, the border authorities did the same thing. It is also a certainty that Balmer wrote at least a dozen opinion pieces denouncing Obama’s same policies, since the professor was concerned back then about human rights and not just scoring political points against Trump today.


Balmer turns his attention to the environment. Yes, God cares for his creation and called it good, but alarmism from faithless, panicky humans is a concern too. Neither he nor I is an expert here, but surely Balmer has read outside his Dartmouth blue bubble and found a huge number of credentialed climate scientists who are skeptical about all the alarmism from the left, as embodied nowadays in Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s recent prediction of earth-shattering disasters by 2030 and her recent green new deal, which would slam the American economy so hard that Dartmouth might lose its big funding and lay off some of the faculty.


Then the professor goes on to the standard leftist notions about tax cuts for the rich and quasi-socialism or its full-scale version as the only expression of justice, and quotes Isaiah. However, taxes were cut for a large number of people on a variety of social levels, including the middle class. When “we the people” keep our own money through lower taxes, then the economy grows and jobs become plentiful because we can spend or invest or give away our new wealth, as we see fit. Businesses can reinvest their capital in their own companies, upgrade, and expand. When businesses expand, they hire new people. And sure enough, this explains, to a large degree, why the economy is booming right now, with record low unemployment for everyone, including an historical low for black Americans.


So the best biblical justice is not rapacious taxes on the producers in society — the ones who started businesses that grew into major corporations that then fund universities like Dartmouth — but limited government, lower taxes and financial liberty for the people.


Here’s an easy-to-remember formula for biblical economic justice:


Leftist economic policy = slow economy = injustice


Conservative economic policy = growing economy = justice.


It was especially reassuring for us believers when in his recent SOTU address Pres. Trump denounced socialism as contrary to America’s founding in liberty. So true. So magnificent. It is gratifying to see that 76% approved of the speech and 72% liked his proposals on immigration, showing once again how anti-commonsense leftist professors are out of step with commonsense Americans.


The obligatory mention of adultery and the seventh commandment: everyone who voted for Trump knew about his multiple affairs and marriages. No one saw him as a saint. But we also know, as does Balmer, that the sweep of the entire Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, is about salvation, redemption, and forgiveness, and God helping broken humanity to live better lives. There is no evidence that Trump has turned the White House into a Pleasure Palace, much like JFK and Bill Clinton did. Just the opposite. The president often invites numerous evangelical leaders into the White House, and prayer meetings happen often enough.


Revealingly, one area that Balmer overlooked is the snuffing out of prenatal life. He knows that New York now has a bloodthirsty law that allows third trimester abortions. HillaryHillary  Clinton had won, the court system would have been stockpiled with judges and justices who would gladly reinforce the bloodguilt in America. The courts and abortion are the major reasons evangelicals voted for Trump.


And they are amply satisfied with his support for Israel; his picks of judges and justices who may give the innocents a chance for life and protect religious freedom; his willingness to negotiate with dictators like Kim Jung Un (Balmer would have applauded Obama had he done this, since leftists value dialogues, trialogues, tetralogues, pentalogues, and so on); Trump’s economic policies; and his support for churches against legalistic attacks from leftists.


I used to be a NeverTrumper and even wrote articles against him (I won’t link to them), until I set aside my Pharisaical self-righteousness and gave the man a chance. No more condescension.


So, a look over the past two years makes it is easy to believe that God indeed chose Trump, and believers are genuinely grateful to God that Hillary Clinton is not in the White House.


James Arlandson’s website is Live as Free People, where he has posted Leftwing NY Hillsong Pastor Carl Lentz Misses Facts on Race, and William Penn Proclaims Pennsylvania’s Charter of Privileges.










The religious left is still looking down on conservative Christian peons for supporting imperfect, feisty Trump.  Throughout social media and elsewhere, the left accuses us of compromising our faith and standards.


Prof. Randall Balmer of Dartmouth University recently posted an opinion piece at the Los Angeles Times with the ironic title “God Is on Team Trump? Let’s take a quick check with the Bible.” The sarcasm is seen when God is on Trump’s team, not the other way around. Then he proceeds to dismantle — at least in his mind — evangelical support for Trump.


He starts off with more sarcasm that God put his thumb on the scale of the election, so that Trump barely won and only by the Electoral College. Some victory for God! In reply, just because we cannot figure out the details of how God works in an ocean of humanity does not mean God does not have his purposes and works them out. Prof. Balmer seems to assume that if a victory is not a landslide, then God was not at work. Since he wrote a book about evangelicals, he must know that some of them with a more prophetic gifting predicted long before the November 2016 elections that Trump’s victory would stun the world. It did.  


Next, Prof. Balmer tackles immigration and summarized some verses in Leviticus and one in the epistle to the Hebrews (since Heb. 13:2 is talking about household hospitality — not on a national scale — and the possibility that an angel could be a guest without our knowledge, let’s skip past his wrenching that verse out of context). It is difficult to find mass migration in the ancient world, but let’s assume that millions and millions of immigrants moved into ancient Israel in 20-30 years. And let’s assume that a certain percentage of them raped and assaulted women and children at the border and transported some sort of ancient, mind-altering drugs. Yes, protect the innocent, but there would be nothing wrong with building a wall back then, much as Israel has done today, to good effect. Obama and other Democrats in the past have said there was a crisis at the border. And there is nothing immoral with securing our borders today with a wall or updating the one that is already there. In any case, these are two different contexts, so let’s move on.


Then Balmer brings up separating children from their parents at the border. Yes, it happened, but it is a sure thing that he knew that under the Obama administration, the border authorities did the same thing. It is also a certainty that Balmer wrote at least a dozen opinion pieces denouncing Obama’s same policies, since the professor was concerned back then about human rights and not just scoring political points against Trump today.


Balmer turns his attention to the environment. Yes, God cares for his creation and called it good, but alarmism from faithless, panicky humans is a concern too. Neither he nor I is an expert here, but surely Balmer has read outside his Dartmouth blue bubble and found a huge number of credentialed climate scientists who are skeptical about all the alarmism from the left, as embodied nowadays in Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s recent prediction of earth-shattering disasters by 2030 and her recent green new deal, which would slam the American economy so hard that Dartmouth might lose its big funding and lay off some of the faculty.


Then the professor goes on to the standard leftist notions about tax cuts for the rich and quasi-socialism or its full-scale version as the only expression of justice, and quotes Isaiah. However, taxes were cut for a large number of people on a variety of social levels, including the middle class. When “we the people” keep our own money through lower taxes, then the economy grows and jobs become plentiful because we can spend or invest or give away our new wealth, as we see fit. Businesses can reinvest their capital in their own companies, upgrade, and expand. When businesses expand, they hire new people. And sure enough, this explains, to a large degree, why the economy is booming right now, with record low unemployment for everyone, including an historical low for black Americans.


So the best biblical justice is not rapacious taxes on the producers in society — the ones who started businesses that grew into major corporations that then fund universities like Dartmouth — but limited government, lower taxes and financial liberty for the people.


Here’s an easy-to-remember formula for biblical economic justice:


Leftist economic policy = slow economy = injustice


Conservative economic policy = growing economy = justice.


It was especially reassuring for us believers when in his recent SOTU address Pres. Trump denounced socialism as contrary to America’s founding in liberty. So true. So magnificent. It is gratifying to see that 76% approved of the speech and 72% liked his proposals on immigration, showing once again how anti-commonsense leftist professors are out of step with commonsense Americans.


The obligatory mention of adultery and the seventh commandment: everyone who voted for Trump knew about his multiple affairs and marriages. No one saw him as a saint. But we also know, as does Balmer, that the sweep of the entire Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, is about salvation, redemption, and forgiveness, and God helping broken humanity to live better lives. There is no evidence that Trump has turned the White House into a Pleasure Palace, much like JFK and Bill Clinton did. Just the opposite. The president often invites numerous evangelical leaders into the White House, and prayer meetings happen often enough.


Revealingly, one area that Balmer overlooked is the snuffing out of prenatal life. He knows that New York now has a bloodthirsty law that allows third trimester abortions. HillaryHillary  Clinton had won, the court system would have been stockpiled with judges and justices who would gladly reinforce the bloodguilt in America. The courts and abortion are the major reasons evangelicals voted for Trump.


And they are amply satisfied with his support for Israel; his picks of judges and justices who may give the innocents a chance for life and protect religious freedom; his willingness to negotiate with dictators like Kim Jung Un (Balmer would have applauded Obama had he done this, since leftists value dialogues, trialogues, tetralogues, pentalogues, and so on); Trump’s economic policies; and his support for churches against legalistic attacks from leftists.


I used to be a NeverTrumper and even wrote articles against him (I won’t link to them), until I set aside my Pharisaical self-righteousness and gave the man a chance. No more condescension.


So, a look over the past two years makes it is easy to believe that God indeed chose Trump, and believers are genuinely grateful to God that Hillary Clinton is not in the White House.


James Arlandson’s website is Live as Free People, where he has posted Leftwing NY Hillsong Pastor Carl Lentz Misses Facts on Race, and William Penn Proclaims Pennsylvania’s Charter of Privileges.




via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/