Posted on

Socialism Promises a Utopia, but Delivers Suffering

Presidential contenders are in a battle to out-give one another.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., proposes a whopping $50,000 per student college loan forgiveness. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., proposes free health care for all Americans plus illegal aliens. Most Democratic presidential candidates promise free stuff that includes free college, universal income, “Medicare for All,” and debt forgiveness.

Their socialist predecessors made promises, too.

“Freedom and Bread” was the slogan used by Adolf
Hitler during the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) campaign
against President Paul von Hindenburg. Hitler even promised, “In the Third
Reich every German girl will find a husband.”

Stalin promised a great socialist-Marxist society that
included better food and better worker conditions.

China’s Mao Zedong promised democratic constitutionalism and
the dream that “farmers have land to till.” These, and other
promises, gave Mao the broad political support he needed to win leadership of
the entire country in 1949.

Socialism promises a utopia that sounds good, but those
promises are never realized. It most often results in massive human suffering.

Capitalism fails miserably when compared with a heaven or
utopia promised by socialism. But any earthly system is going to come up short
in such a comparison. Mankind must make choices among alternative economic
systems that actually exist.

It turns out that for the common man capitalism, with all of
its alleged shortcomings, is superior to any system yet devised to deal with
his everyday needs and desires. By most any measure of human well-being, people
who live in countries toward the capitalistic end of the economic spectrum are far
better off than their fellow men who live in countries toward the socialist
end. Why?

Capitalism, or what some call free markets, is relatively
new in human history. Prior to capitalism, the way individuals amassed great
wealth was by looting, plundering, and enslaving their fellow man. With the
rise of capitalism, it became possible to amass great wealth by serving and
pleasing your fellow man.

Capitalists seek to discover what people want and produce
and market it as efficiently as possible as a means to profit. A historical
example of this process would be John D. Rockefeller, whose successful
marketing drove kerosene prices down from 58 cents a gallon in 1865 to 7 cents
in 1900. Henry Ford became rich by producing cars for the common man.

Both Ford’s and Rockefeller’s personal benefits pale in
comparison to the benefits received by the common man who had cheaper kerosene
and cheaper and more convenient transportation. There are literally thousands
of examples of how mankind’s life has been made better by those in the pursuit
of profits.

Here’s my question to you: Are the people who, by their actions, created unprecedented convenience, longer life expectancy, and a more pleasant life for the ordinary person—and became wealthy in the process—deserving of all the scorn and ridicule heaped upon them by intellectuals and political hustlers today?

In many intellectual and political circles, the pursuit of
profits is seen as evil. However, this pursuit forces entrepreneurs to find
ways to either please people efficiently or go bankrupt. Of course, they could
mess up and avoid bankruptcy if they can get government to bail them out or
give them protection against competition.

Nonprofit organizations have an easier time of it. As a matter of fact, people tend to be the most displeased with services received from public schools, motor vehicle departments, and other government agencies. Nonprofits can operate whether they please people or not. That’s because they derive their compensation through taxes.

I’m sure that we’d be less satisfied with supermarkets if they had the power to take our money through taxes, as opposed to being forced to find ways to get us to voluntarily give them our money.

By the way, I’m not making an outright condemnation of
socialism. I run my household on the Marxist principle, “From each
according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

That system works when you can remember the names of all
involved.

COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

The post Socialism Promises a Utopia, but Delivers Suffering appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Posted on

Continuing plunge of CNN, MSNBC ratings reveals that fake news is a bad business strategy

The catastrophic ratings decline for both CNN and MSNBC was no temporary blip following publication of the Mueller report. Both cable news outlets had heavily promoted the hoax of Russian collusion with the Trump administration, teasing the hopes of Trump-haters for impeachment and prosecution for treason. Now, those disappointed viewers have gone away, and continue to stay away.

Fake (“replica”) CNN Newsroom at CNN Center in Atlanta (Photo credit: Doug Waldron)

TV Newser (free registration required) reveals the continuing loss of a substantial portion of the viewership for both cable news networks in the third week of May:

CNN experienced its lowest-rated week since November 2015 in the 25-54 demo. Additionally, MSNBC marked its lowest-rated prime time week of the year in the demo. Rachel Maddow delivered her lowest-rated week of the year in both total viewers and the 25-54 demo.

The most dramatic decline was in the prized demo, age 25 – 54, with MSNBC down 42% and CNN down 43%. Advertisers are getting barely more than half as many potential consumers watching their ads in both cable news outlets.

To be fair, last year was an election year, and Fox News also experienced a decline of 22%, but that is roughly half the decline of the two progressive outlets.

Fox News lost the crown of the most-viewed cable channel to ESPN, which benefitted from the NBA playoffs.

Overall cable channels rankings:

PRIME TIME

  1. ESPN (2,720,000)

  2. Fox News Channel (2,333,000)

  3. TNT (2,123,000)

  4. MSNBC (1,487,000)

  5. HGTV (1,160,000)

  6. NBC Sports Network (1,133,000)

  7. USA (1,076,000)

  8. TBS (934,000)

  9. Hallmark Channel (893,000)

  10. History (893,000)

TOTAL DAY (6a – 6a)

  1. Fox News (1,313,000)

  2. ESPN (887,000)

  3. MSNBC (848,000)

  4. TNT (799,000)

  5. HGTV (665,000)

  6. Investigation Discovery (641,000)

  7. Nickelodeon (638,000)

  8. USA (536,000)

  9. CNN (520,000)

  10. History (507,000)

John Nolte of Breitbart points out that the unmasking of the Russia Hoax is only the latest example of fake news purveyed by both progressive cable networks (as well as most of the MSM). He lists the fake news frauds of recent memory:

  • George Zimmerman: White Racist Killer

  • Hands Up, Don’t Shoot

  • Trump Can’t Win

  • Brett Kavanaugh: Serial Rapist

  • The KKKids from KKKovington High School

  • Trump Colluded with Russia

To that list must be added the incredible on-air promotion of Michael Avenatti, just indicted for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from his client Stormy Daniels, adding to his existing indictments in New York and Los Angeles for attempting to shake down Nike.

Both CNN and MSNBC are subsidiaries of large publicly-held corporations, AT&T and Comcast, respectively. It is time for the grown-ups at the corporate level to recognize that each of their subsidiaries have adopted a losing business strategy of focusing on left-wing propaganda, a declining market niche. Shareholders need to demand that existing management be replaced at both cable news operations. They have squandered their credibility and need to provide former viewers with visible evidence that they have learned their lessons.

The move of CNN’s New York operations from Columbus Circle to Hudson Yards has already been used as an excuse to lay off more than a hundred staffers, a typical move of companies in decline. But that cost-saving measure will not persuade former viewers to return, much less add new viewers. Firing Jeff Zucker, head of CNN who was promoted by AT&T and given broader responsibilities, would be a visible sign that corporate understands the need to change and to win back lost viewers.

Hat tip: Roger Luchs

The catastrophic ratings decline for both CNN and MSNBC was no temporary blip following publication of the Mueller report. Both cable news outlets had heavily promoted the hoax of Russian collusion with the Trump administration, teasing the hopes of Trump-haters for impeachment and prosecution for treason. Now, those disappointed viewers have gone away, and continue to stay away.

Fake (“replica”) CNN Newsroom at CNN Center in Atlanta (Photo credit: Doug Waldron)

TV Newser (free registration required) reveals the continuing loss of a substantial portion of the viewership for both cable news networks in the third week of May:

CNN experienced its lowest-rated week since November 2015 in the 25-54 demo. Additionally, MSNBC marked its lowest-rated prime time week of the year in the demo. Rachel Maddow delivered her lowest-rated week of the year in both total viewers and the 25-54 demo.

The most dramatic decline was in the prized demo, age 25 – 54, with MSNBC down 42% and CNN down 43%. Advertisers are getting barely more than half as many potential consumers watching their ads in both cable news outlets.

To be fair, last year was an election year, and Fox News also experienced a decline of 22%, but that is roughly half the decline of the two progressive outlets.

Fox News lost the crown of the most-viewed cable channel to ESPN, which benefitted from the NBA playoffs.

Overall cable channels rankings:

PRIME TIME

  1. ESPN (2,720,000)

  2. Fox News Channel (2,333,000)

  3. TNT (2,123,000)

  4. MSNBC (1,487,000)

  5. HGTV (1,160,000)

  6. NBC Sports Network (1,133,000)

  7. USA (1,076,000)

  8. TBS (934,000)

  9. Hallmark Channel (893,000)

  10. History (893,000)

TOTAL DAY (6a – 6a)

  1. Fox News (1,313,000)

  2. ESPN (887,000)

  3. MSNBC (848,000)

  4. TNT (799,000)

  5. HGTV (665,000)

  6. Investigation Discovery (641,000)

  7. Nickelodeon (638,000)

  8. USA (536,000)

  9. CNN (520,000)

  10. History (507,000)

John Nolte of Breitbart points out that the unmasking of the Russia Hoax is only the latest example of fake news purveyed by both progressive cable networks (as well as most of the MSM). He lists the fake news frauds of recent memory:

  • George Zimmerman: White Racist Killer

  • Hands Up, Don’t Shoot

  • Trump Can’t Win

  • Brett Kavanaugh: Serial Rapist

  • The KKKids from KKKovington High School

  • Trump Colluded with Russia

To that list must be added the incredible on-air promotion of Michael Avenatti, just indicted for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from his client Stormy Daniels, adding to his existing indictments in New York and Los Angeles for attempting to shake down Nike.

Both CNN and MSNBC are subsidiaries of large publicly-held corporations, AT&T and Comcast, respectively. It is time for the grown-ups at the corporate level to recognize that each of their subsidiaries have adopted a losing business strategy of focusing on left-wing propaganda, a declining market niche. Shareholders need to demand that existing management be replaced at both cable news operations. They have squandered their credibility and need to provide former viewers with visible evidence that they have learned their lessons.

The move of CNN’s New York operations from Columbus Circle to Hudson Yards has already been used as an excuse to lay off more than a hundred staffers, a typical move of companies in decline. But that cost-saving measure will not persuade former viewers to return, much less add new viewers. Firing Jeff Zucker, head of CNN who was promoted by AT&T and given broader responsibilities, would be a visible sign that corporate understands the need to change and to win back lost viewers.

Hat tip: Roger Luchs

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Posted on

Levin: ‘The president of the United States cannot, must not be blackmailed by the Democrat House of Representatives’

“Nancy Pelosi wants to be speaker of the House more than she wants to be a patriot,” LevinTV host Mark Levin concluded on the radio Tuesday evening of the California Democrat’s actions, after her attacks on President Trump torpedoed a bipartisan infrastructure meeting at the White House.

Levin pointed to news of a scheduled meeting earlier that day at the White House between congressional Democrats and President Trump about infrastructure. Immediately before that meeting, however, Pelosi attacked the president by telling reporters he was “engaged in a cover-up” in reference to the House of Representatives’ investigations against him.

Trump later left the meeting before announcing from the White House Rose Garden that he would not work with congressional Democrats until the Democrat-led investigations were brought to a halt.

“So I’ve said from the beginning, right from the beginning, that you probably can’t go down two tracks,” President Trump said. “You can go down the investigation track, and you can go down the investment track or the track of ‘Let’s get things done for the American people.’ I love the American people.”

Levin said that was the right move.

“You’re not going to sit down and do a deal with somebody who just accused you of a crime,” Levin said in defense of Trump’s decision.

“The president of the United States cannot, must not be blackmailed by the Democrat House of Representatives,” Levin added. “He must not serve at their demand. He’s not their staffer. He’s not a defendant to the House of Representatives. … The president replied the way he should have replied.”

Listen:

Don’t miss an episode of LevinTV. Sign up for your FREE 30-day trial now!

The post Levin: ‘The president of the United States cannot, must not be blackmailed by the Democrat House of Representatives’ appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com

Posted on

Poll: 71 Percent of Voters Positive on Economy — Highest Rate in Almost 18 Years

American voters like today’s economy so much that the percentage who say it is “excellent” or “good” represents 71 percent. That’s the highest total number in almost 18 years, according to a Quinnipiac University National poll issued on Tuesday.

The poll found 22 percent responded that the economy is “excellent” and 49 percent said it is “good.”

The majority of American voters also are happy with their own economic outlook.  

“Some 52 percent of American voters say they are better off financially today than they were in 2016, while 21 percent say they are worse off and 23 percent say they are the same,” the polling group says of its findings.

Quinnipiac reports, however, even with those positive numbers, President Donald Trump isn’t getting credit for those high economic scores or the fact that his policies have positively impacted the economy.

The poll asked: Do you think President Trump’s trade policies are good or bad for the U.S. economy?

Those who answered “good” were 40 percent compared to 48 percent who responded “bad.”

That is, however, better than his rating on July 2, 2018 — 39 percent good, 50 percent bad.

“American voters give Trump mixed grades for his handling of the economy as 48 percent approve and 45 percent disapprove,” the polling group reports.

“The nation’s economy is pretty darn good and President Donald Trump’s approval numbers are pretty darn awful,” Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll,” said of the poll. “So what to make of the good news, bad news mashup and how to correct it?”

When the numbers behind the good economy are broken down along party lines, 50 percent of Republicans answered “excellent,” where only 3 percent of Democrats choose that word to describe today’s economy.

But more Democrats rated the economy as “good” than Republicans — 51 percent to 42 percent respectively.

The telephone survey was conducted from May 16 – 20, 2019 across the country and included 1,078 “self-identified” registered voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.7 percent.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

Beverly Hills Bans Sale Of Tobacco Products – Except Where The Wealthy Smoke

Beverly Hills, California, voted this week to become the first city in the nation to ban the sale of tobacco products within the city limits, except for three high-end cigar lounges where the wealthy hang out.

The city council voted Tuesday to approve the ban, which would apply to gas stations, convenience stores, pharmacies, and grocery stores. High-end hotels are also exempt, but can only sell the products through concierge services.

Wealthy residents, including actor and former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, lobbied the city to exempt their favorite haunts.

“Great cities are defined by their great people, places and institutions, and the Grand Havana Room is a signature location where these three things come together in Beverly Hills,” Schwarzeneggar wrote in a March 11 letter to the city panel considering the policy, according to CNBC.

“It is unthinkable that the city might adopt a policy that would intentionally or unintentionally cause the closure of this character-defining institution, and it should not do so,” he added.

Nick Miller, who operates a gas station in the city, told CNBC before the vote that it would hurt his business. Further, he told the outlet it was hypocritical of the city to carve out exemptions for the elite.

“The level of hypocrisy that has been displayed at this time by the Beverly Hills Council is just astonishing,” he said. “They’re allowing hotels to maintain the sale of cigarettes because apparently [sic] to somebody buying a $4,000 a night room.”

Hotels were exempted thanks to lobbying by the Beverly Hills Chamber of Commerce. Chamber CEO Todd Johnson wrote a letter to the city on April 17 urging them to exempt hotels.

“Approximately 80% of our guests were from cities outside of the United States, many from cultures where smoking is more prevalent,” Johnson said in his letter, according to CNBC. “It is our concern that a ban on tobacco sales will deter such visitors, including prominent dignitaries, from staying in Beverly Hills, and will both hurt hotel revenues upon which the city depends as well as encourage people to stay elsewhere.”

Fox News reported that policy and management analyst for Beverly Hills, Logan Phillippo, provided a report to the city council warning about potential legal challenges.

“Courts have not yet reviewed citywide bans on tobacco sales, however, so there is still uncertainty as to whether a court would uphold this type of ban if challenged,” the report said. “Given that no other City in the United States has adopted a comprehensive ban on all tobacco products, the City is likely to face legal challenges.”

The report also explained how to implement the ban.

As Beverly Hills becomes the first city to ban the sale of tobacco to anyone but the wealthy, the U.S. Senate has introduced a bill that would increase the age that someone can purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21. The bill was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). The bill sends the message that an American is old enough to die for their country at age 18, but too immature to smoke for another three years.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Posted on

John Cusack Attacks ‘MAGA F*cks’ After Photo Shows Him Sitting During Cubs Game Military Salute

Actor John Cusack lashed out at supporters of President Donald Trump after a photo showed him sitting in his seat during a military salute at a recent Chicago Cubs game.

“I didn’t stand up for Boeing military salute – fast enough for some maga fuck – see? don’t even have taste not to brand weapons company all over score board,” John Cusack said soon after a photo of him sitting during a Cubs game Boeing Military Salute went viral on social media.

The Twitter account CWBChicago later acknowledged that it had been blocked by Cusack.

“Flag sucking halfwits – maga deathkkkult freaks Being anti war – is pro troops – pro human,” the Hot Tub Time Machine star later said. Cusack also took a shot directly at President Trump, saying, “Trump. Wraps himself in the us flag – literarily hugs it . You think he’s a patriot ?”

Cusack, an ardent Bernie Sanders supporter, barely goes a day without calling the president, his supporters, or Republicans members of a “deathkkkult.” The 2012 actor also constantly calls for the impeachment of President Trump.

Last week, Cusack huddled with Democrats in Washington, D.C. for their “marathon public marathoning” of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report and demanded that President Trump be “removed from office.”

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

New study reveals Trump Derangement Syndrome even weirder

The psychiatric profession, a generally leftist group, does not yet recognize Trump Derangement Syndrome as an official malady, but the evidence is everywhere that large numbers of people have become mentally disturbed by their hatred of Donald Trump. Examples abound, even within the last few days. For instance, actor Robert De Niro hijacked an award ceremony for his friend Al Pacino by launching an obscenity-laced attack on Trump, appearing to channel the murderously insane character Travis Bickel he portrayed in Taxi Driver.  And author Fran Liebowitz embarrassed TV host Bill Maher with her comment implying President Trump ought to be murdered and dismembered, triggering an apology and expression of regret.

As if that is not bizarre enough, my friend Andrew Malcolm reports:

 A new study finds many Democrats were exaggerating the anxiety and stress they felt after the absolutely certain presidential election of Hillary Clinton that didn’t happen. You may recall Clinton herself was so shook up she could not appear on TV to concede on election night. She had to wait a day to compose herself.

Well, now this new study published in the journal SageOpen finds that many Democrats were, as Mark Twain would put it, telling stretchers about their stress and anxiety levels as a twisted way, they felt, of supporting their party.

“Our research suggests that for many Democrats, expressing mental distress after the election was a form of partisan cheerleading,” said the researchers Masha Krupenkin, David Rothschild, Shawndra Hill and Elad Yom-Tov.

“Clearly,” they added, “many Democrats were, and are, upset about the 2016 Republican victory. These findings do not invalidate those feelings but put their depth and related actions into perspective.”

Is this an example of Munchausen Syndrome (now-renamed Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self)? As described by the Cleveland Clinic it is:

…a mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical, emotional or cognitive disorder when, in truth, he or she has caused the symptoms. People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured, not to achieve a concrete benefit, such as financial gain. They are even willing to undergo painful or risky tests and operations in order to get the sympathy and special attention given to people who are truly ill.

 Or perhaps it is simply a play for prestige among other progressives. People gain prestige within a social system by claiming to embody the values of that group.

Even CNN notices TDS (Vimeo screen grab)

But how looney is it to pretend to be looney? Is that crazier than just being crazy itself?

We live in the weirdest political moment of my lifetime.

The psychiatric profession, a generally leftist group, does not yet recognize Trump Derangement Syndrome as an official malady, but the evidence is everywhere that large numbers of people have become mentally disturbed by their hatred of Donald Trump. Examples abound, even within the last few days. For instance, actor Robert De Niro hijacked an award ceremony for his friend Al Pacino by launching an obscenity-laced attack on Trump, appearing to channel the murderously insane character Travis Bickel he portrayed in Taxi Driver.  And author Fran Liebowitz embarrassed TV host Bill Maher with her comment implying President Trump ought to be murdered and dismembered, triggering an apology and expression of regret.

As if that is not bizarre enough, my friend Andrew Malcolm reports:

 A new study finds many Democrats were exaggerating the anxiety and stress they felt after the absolutely certain presidential election of Hillary Clinton that didn’t happen. You may recall Clinton herself was so shook up she could not appear on TV to concede on election night. She had to wait a day to compose herself.

Well, now this new study published in the journal SageOpen finds that many Democrats were, as Mark Twain would put it, telling stretchers about their stress and anxiety levels as a twisted way, they felt, of supporting their party.

“Our research suggests that for many Democrats, expressing mental distress after the election was a form of partisan cheerleading,” said the researchers Masha Krupenkin, David Rothschild, Shawndra Hill and Elad Yom-Tov.

“Clearly,” they added, “many Democrats were, and are, upset about the 2016 Republican victory. These findings do not invalidate those feelings but put their depth and related actions into perspective.”

Is this an example of Munchausen Syndrome (now-renamed Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self)? As described by the Cleveland Clinic it is:

…a mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical, emotional or cognitive disorder when, in truth, he or she has caused the symptoms. People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured, not to achieve a concrete benefit, such as financial gain. They are even willing to undergo painful or risky tests and operations in order to get the sympathy and special attention given to people who are truly ill.

 Or perhaps it is simply a play for prestige among other progressives. People gain prestige within a social system by claiming to embody the values of that group.

Even CNN notices TDS (Vimeo screen grab)

But how looney is it to pretend to be looney? Is that crazier than just being crazy itself?

We live in the weirdest political moment of my lifetime.

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Posted on

KLAVAN: Why Democrats Are The Dragon Queen

Andrew Klavan discusses the series finale of the HBO fantasy series “Game of Thrones” and discusses how Democrats are becoming the dragon queen on Monday’s episode of “The Andrew Klavan Show.” Video and partial transcript below:

Democrats are the dragon queen. They are the dragon queen. You know, last week we saw not just in my Stanford address, where they tried to start trouble, where the administration tried to start trouble and kind of shut me down and get people upset. But we saw — we had my friend on Michael Loftis the comedian, who told you how he couldn’t get his stuff sold because he was a right-winger. So, they want to silence him.

We saw Jenna Ellis, now Mrs. Reeves, Jenna Ellis Reeves, was blocked on Facebook for supporting Matt Walsh in his anti-abortion fight. We see all these people being thrown off. We see people using power without thinking about the fact that power contradicts the very things they are trying to achieve. And you know, I know they started out, or at least in their hearts, wanting to do good. I know they want to reverse racist policies of the past, but the Left has become truly, truly wicked in their racist ideas. You know, this is something enormous, identity politics which is racism with a smiley face, is simple evil. And I mean I see it all the time, I see like segregated dorms and colleges.

In my profession and storytelling, they now have a thing called “own story” which is you can only tell your own story or the story of people like you. We saw this with Elton John’s movie coming out and people started to complain about the fact that the actor who plays the gay Elton John is not himself gay, and Elton John, to his credit, came out said that’s garbage that is B.S. because it’s just a movie. But if you think about it, the thought … that there is something about it between a black person and a white person, between a gay person and a straight person; some barrier that keeps an artist, whose job is to portray all of humanity, that keeps them apart. So, they’ve come back to the kind of racism, the Left has come back to the kind of racism they practiced under Jim Crow. They keep saying, “Well that was different because now you got Nixon’s Southern strategy changing everything.” The same attitude. It is the same thing.

So, it’s evil stuff they’re pushing on people. They start out trying to do good; they wind up doing evil because they feel that they have got what’s right and they’re going to eliminate all choice. Eliminate all voices on the other side. And that is the journey of the dragon queen in “Game of Thrones.” But what we should have been doing instead of going on and saying I didn’t want this person to take the throne and I didn’t do this and why didn’t they say this on Twitter, which is what conservative Twitter looks like. We should have been saying “oh look the Democrats, the Democrats are the dragon queen, they have started out trying to do good and now they’re so convinced that only their way is good that they are going to enforce that on everybody else.” And what the queen says is they don’t get to decide. Those people that she’s liberating, she’s going to liberate them, and they don’t get to decide what’s good because she knows what’s good. She’s a Leftist. She becomes a Leftist.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Posted on

ANOTHER CLOWN JOINS THE CIRCUS

ANOTHER CLOWN JOINS THE CIRCUSThe 2020 presidential election started on the night Donald Trump was elected President of the United States. Since that night, Democrats and their allies in the media have been working tirelessly to undermine his agenda and harm his standing with the American people.

The Mueller investigation was a bogus two-year effort to sabotage President Trump and drive him from office. Fortunately, the scheme did not work, and most congressional Democrats realize that impeachment is unlikely and politically unpopular.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/