NYT Blames Test-Prep Tutoring for Black, Latino Decline in Best Schools

The number of African-American students in New York’s selective high schools has crashed as more immigrant Asian students win seats — yet the problem is not the federal policy of mass immigration, says the New York Times.

The real cause is that fewer African-American and Latino students are enrolling in commercial cram courses, the newspaper insists:

For years, most who took the admissions test had little to no preparation. Today, test prep is a rapidly expanding local industry. At the same time, many accelerated academic programs in mostly black and Hispanic neighborhoods have closed as Asian immigrants have embraced the specialized high schools as tickets out of poverty.

As test prep has become all but a prerequisite over the last decade, advanced academic classes have evaporated for many black and Hispanic students.

The schools, such as Stuyvesant High School, play an outsized role in the city’s politics and culture because they have helped generations of clever working-class kids jump into the middle class. The article noted:

In interviews, more than a dozen black and Hispanic students who graduated from New York City’s specialized high schools from 1975 to 1995 described the schools as oases for smart children from troubled neighborhoods. But the alumni said they were anguished that the schools have since lost nearly all of their black and Hispanic students.

But the article’s graphics and the text undermine the ‘blame test-prep’ explanation.

Instead, the article reveals how the African-American and Latino shares of the schools have declined as the immigrant Asian share has risen.

The article’s text acknowledges the population shift:

White enrollment has also fallen while Asian enrollment has ballooned. Among the most drastic shifts: Brooklyn Technical High School’s black population dropped to 6 percent in 2016 from 51 percent in 1982 …

Black and Hispanic students currently represent 70 percent of the school system, but make up just 10 percent of the enrollment in the specialized schools.

From 1970 to 2011, the number of Asia-born immigrants living in New York City increased about eightfold to 843,000 from 105,000.

The New York Times article tries to hide another big shift amid the immigration — a huge drop in the share of school slots going to white students. For example, the percentage of white students in Stuyvesant fell from roughly 65 percent in 1976 to just 19 percent in 2016. During the same period, the percentage of black and Latino students fell from roughly 14 percent to just 4 percent, while the Asian percentage spiked to from roughly 17 percent to 74 percent.

While trying to blame test prep courses, the New York Times article tiptoes close to the central issue — immigration — which it indirectly and passively describes as “demographics.”

Since … 1978, the specialized school admissions process has been transformed by changes in the city’s demographics, its public school system and the culture around the schools’ entrance exam, which is at the center of the debate over the future of the elite schools.

Yet the city’s demographics are not a passive, inanimate thing, like gravity, earthquakes or the tides.

The city’s demographics are shaped by federal, state, and city policies, for example, which could try to encourage Americans to migrate to New York and to get married and have more kids.

But federal, state and city policies are instead encouraging the inflow of Asian immigrants, as part of the deliberate federal policy of stimulating the economy by legally importing 1 million foreign workers, consumers, and residents each year.

That huge foreign influx adds roughly one new legal immigrant for every four Americans who turn 18 each year. That influx is welcomed in New York City which has declared itself a “sanctuary city” to shield its roughly 500,000 cheap-labor illegal immigrant service workers from deportation. The illegal and legal cheap workers are a boon to the city’s elite, which gains cheaper services, higher rents and more wealth as more migrants crowd into the city’s labor market, apartments and groceries.

The federal policy also makes it difficult for Americans to have kids — especially in New York — because the flood of legal and illegal migrants cuts their wages and drives up their housing costs, especially for blue-collar Americans of every color and hue.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Two Illegal Aliens Accused of Gang-Raping 13-Year-Old North Carolina Girl

Two teenagers arrested months ago for allegedly gang-raping a 13-year-old girl in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, are illegal aliens, Breitbart News has confirmed.

Allan Rafael Cardenas Delcid, an 18-year-old illegal alien, and Jose Kevin Ortiz-Torres, a 19-year-old illegal alien, were arrested in April after police said they allegedly raped a 13-year-old girl at a local park trail.

Records obtained by Breitbart News reveal that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has placed a detainer on Delcid, demanding that he be turned over to federal agents for deportation should he be released from custody at any time.

Likewise, ICE has also placed a detainer on Ortiz-Torres. A law enforcement official told Breitbart News that the illegal alien was in the process of being deported when he was arrested for rape.

In 2015, Ortiz-Torres was arrested by ICE after entering the country through the U.S.-Mexico border as an Unaccompanied Minor Child (UAC). His last immigration hearing was on April 4, 2018.

Police officers said they first discovered the 13-year-old girl in a car with the two illegal aliens while they were patrolling the area, but did not witness the alleged rape. Further evidence in the case led to the statutory rape charges against Delcid and Ortiz-Torres.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.  

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Bette Midler Shares Fake Trump Meme, Gets Roasted. Her Non-Apology Apology Includes More Fake News.

Actress and vocal Trump hater Bette Midler offered a quasi-apology after she was ripped online for sharing a widely-debunked meme of President Donald Trump with her 1.6 million Twitter followers. Offering her non-apology apology, the actress suggested it was Trump’s fault she shared the fake meme because he “lies” so much; she also spread another lie about Trump in the process of her “apology.”

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Violent Leftist Thug Attacks Trump Supporters at Protest — Spits in Woman’s Face – Is Quickly Arrested (VIDEO)

On Sunday a group of Trump supporters held a rally in California.

During the protest an unhinged anti-Trumper attacked the group.

The thug screamed, pushed, cursed at and bullied the Trump supporters.

Then he spit on a female Trump supporter… in the face!

Via That’s the Point with Brandon.

The good news is… The thug got arrested.

And at one point one of the attackers tried to steal a skateboard and US flag from the Trump supporters.
The attacker was not able to get away with his crime. He got whacked instead.

Brandon told The Gateway Pundit — “It was a pro-Trump rally at the Federal Building in Los Angeles. At first it was just a pro-Trump rally. Counter-protesters from Antifa were there earlier in the day and they were overtaken by MAGA supporters with no violence. Then later after Antifa left the area this guy parked his car and got out and started threatening people as the video shows.

Here is the full video…
Via That’s the Point with Brandon.

The post Violent Leftist Thug Attacks Trump Supporters at Protest — Spits in Woman’s Face – Is Quickly Arrested (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Strzok-Page Emails Show Gaps In Clinton Probe Files, Alleged ‘Special Treatment’ For Her Lawyer

They failed to document four interviews. Why? Via Fox News: Internal FBI emails released Monday show FBI officials in 2016 sought to “expeditiously” accommodate a request for information from then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, in what a conservative watchdog group claimed is evidence of “special treatment.” Judicial Watch – a group that routinely sues […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

BOOM! Sean Hannity: According to Sources the Horowitz IG Report Was Handed Over to AG Bill Barr — May Be Released this Week

On Monday night Sean Hannity invited Judicial Watch founder and president Tom Fitton and investigative reporter Sara Carter on to discuss the double standards of the unethical Obama DOJ and FBI.

Towards the end of the segment Sean Hannity dropped a bomb on the deep state.

According to Sean Hannity and what he is hearing from his sources Inspector General Horowitz has turned over his report to Attorney General Bill Barr and the report may be released this week.

Via Hannity:

The post BOOM! Sean Hannity: According to Sources the Horowitz IG Report Was Handed Over to AG Bill Barr — May Be Released this Week appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Judge rejects House Democrats’ attempt to block border wall spending

In April, House Democrats sued the Trump administration claiming the President was violating Congress’ constitutional authority to appropriate funds by re-allocating money for his border wall. Today, a federal judge rejected that claim:

A federal judge in Washington on Monday denied a request by House Democrats to block President Donald Trump from transferring funds from appropriated accounts to construct his wall.

Judge Trevor McFadden said the House lacks standing to bring the challenge and also he does not believe the court should step into the fight between the President and Congress.

“The Court declines to take sides in this fight between the House and the President,” McFadden wrote.

Fox News reports that Judge McFadden found Congress had other means to address Trump’s spending if it was so inclined:

McFadden noted in particular that Democrats retained the power to modify or even repeal the appropriations law if they wanted to “exempt future appropriations” from the Trump administration’s reach…

“Congress has several political arrows in its quiver to counter perceived threats to its sphere of power,” McFadden wrote. “These tools show that this lawsuit is not a last resort for the House. And this fact is also exemplified by the many other cases across the country challenging the administration’s planned construction of the border wall.”

McFadden continued: “The House retains the institutional tools necessary to remedy any harm caused to this power by the Administration’s actions. Its Members can, with a two-thirds majority, override the President’s veto of the resolution voiding the National Emergency Declaration. They did not. It can amend appropriations laws to expressly restrict the transfer or spending of funds for a border wall under Sections 284 and 2808. Indeed, it appears to be doing so.”

Back in February, President Trump issued an emergency declaration on the border and announced his intent to redirect money that had already been appropriated by Congress toward the construction of the wall. Democrats, with some help from Republicans, passed a bill aimed at blocking President Trump from spending the money in March. President Trump vetoed the bill the day after it passed the Senate. It was the first veto of his presidency. With that effort having failed, Democrats sued the administration.

Judge McFadden himself expected the case would be appealed regardless of what decision he reached. “I’m not sure how much necessarily our views will carry the day for the courts above us,” he said at a hearing last month.

The post Judge rejects House Democrats’ attempt to block border wall spending appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

3 Things to Know About a Disaster Spending Bill Conservatives Couldn’t Stop

A  $19.1 billion disaster aid bill that faced significant opposition from conservative Republicans passed the House on Monday evening by a lopsided vote of 354-58.

Only Republicans voted against the measure, which includes funding in the aftermath of hurricanes, wildfires, and other storms as well as money to help Puerto Rico rebuild from hurricane damage in 2017.

President Donald Trump is expected to sign the spending bill.

Here are three things to know about the bill, which amounts to more than four times what Trump previously requested to construct a wall or other barriers at the southern border.

1. Conservatives Stalled It

Three conservative Republicans—Chip Roy of Texas, then Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and finally John Rose of Tennessee—last week blocked the spending bill three separate times.

“If the speaker of this House thought that this was must-pass legislation, the speaker … should have called a vote on this bill before sending every member of Congress on recess for 10 days,” Massiesaid of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi when he blocked the measure Tuesday.

The Senate already had passed the spending bill. Since the House was on recess last week, a single lawmaker could object to prevent passage by unanimous consent rather than a recorded vote.

“You can’t have bills passed in Congress with nobody voting on them,” Massie said. “That is the definition of the swamp, and that’s what people resent about this place.”

The move by the three Republicans was met with criticism from some in their own party as well as Democrats, with Rep. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., saying that “many will not be able to plant this year” if the disaster aid package did not go through.

Roy had objected to the bill last Monday, blocking passage, as had Rose on Thursday.

Roy said on Twitter: “Congress should not attempt to pass major spending bills when members of Congress aren’t even in Washington, D.C., to debate and vote on said bills, especially when that bill provides no funding to address the humanitarian crisis on our border.”

2. Unrelated Funding

The disaster relief measure also contains elements that are completely unrelated.

The bill includes funding for block grants sponsored by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Justin Bogie, a senior policy analyst in fiscal affairs at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal in an email that

“Something that we have consistently been critical of in these bills is funding for the Community Development Block Grant,” Bogie, who works in Heritage’s Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget, said.

“This bill has another $2.4 billion for it,” he said. ”We have called for this grant to be eliminated in [Heritage’s] “Blueprint for Balance,” as it is poorly targeted and there is little evidence that it is effective.”

“Payouts from these grants have also been notoriously slow, meaning that it’s hard to make the argument they are appropriate ‘emergency’ response,” Bogie said..

In a radio interview published Saturday on “Larry Glover Live,” Massie said the bill was reckless spending.

“This is not a trivial bill, this is unbudgeted, this is nowhere in the budget,” Massie said. “I think any time Congress spends any amount of money, certainly more than let’s say a million dollars, there should be a recorded vote.”

3. No Wall Funding

The legislation does not include funding for a wall or other barrier along portions of the southern border, which Trump has requested for months.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said that wall funding was not a top priority for the legislation.

“The president said OK,” Shelby said, according to NPR. “I’m sure he wanted the border [wall funding] but we took that all out and we’re going to try to push that separately.”

The post 3 Things to Know About a Disaster Spending Bill Conservatives Couldn’t Stop appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

These Are the Hollywood Studios Threatening to Boycott Georgia Over Pro-Life Law

A growing number of Hollywood studios said they will consider no longer conducting their filming business in Georgia should the heartbeat law take effect in 2020.

The film industry adds about $9.5 billion to Georgia’s economy, but a variety of Hollywood studios said the heartbeat law violates Roe v. Wade and that they are considering taking their filming elsewhere, NBC News reported.

dailycallerlogo

Republican Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp signed a fetal heartbeat bill in May that is set to go into effect Jan. 1, 2020, banning most abortions in Georgia after a heartbeat is detected. The bill makes exceptions in cases of rape and incest with a police report, and when the mother’s health is at risk.

Hollywood studios are threatening to withhold their business, noting they are each monitoring the situation and will pay attention to their actors’ and production teams’ wishes.

Netflix said the Georgia ban would make the company rethink its investment in Georgia.

“We have many women working on productions in Georgia, whose rights, along with millions of others, will be severely restricted by this law,” said Netflix chief content officer Ted Sarandos. “It’s why we will work with the ACLU and others to fight it in court. Given the legislation has not yet been implemented, we’ll continue to film there — while also supporting partners and artists who choose not to.

Disney CEO Bob Iger said he doesn’t see how it is practical for Disney to continue shooting in Georgia if the law goes into effect, adding that the law would make it “very difficult” for Disney to keep filming there.

“I rather doubt we will,” Iger told Reuters. “I think many people who work for us will not want to work there, and we will have to heed their wishes in that regard. Right now we are watching it very carefully.”

Though the company is vocal about boycotting Georgia, Disney profits from doing business in China, a notorious human rights violator that has undertaken mass detentions of Uighur Muslims, placing them in internment camps.

Disney also filmed movies in Middle Eastern countries with stricter abortion laws than the Georgia bill, including Jordan and the United Arab Emirates.A

NBC Universal said it expects the bill will meet serious challenges.

“We fully expect that the heartbeat bills and similar laws in various states will face serious legal challenges and will not go into effect while the process proceeds in court,” NBC stated. “If any of these laws are upheld, it would strongly impact our decision-making on where we produce our content in the future.”

Warner Media said the company respects due process, adding that it often works in countries that might not hold stances Warner Media agrees with.

“We operate and produce work in many states and within several countries at any given time and while that doesn’t mean we agree with every position taken by a state or a country and their leaders, we do respect due process,” Warner Media said in a statement.

“We will watch the situation closely and if the new law holds we will reconsider Georgia as the home to any new productions. As is always the case, we will work closely with our production partners and talent to determine how and where to shoot any given project.”

Sony commented on the heartbeat law as well.

“As the MPAA has noted, the outcome of the Georgia ‘heartbeat law,’ and similar proposed legislation in other states, will be determined through the legal process,” Sony said. “We will continue to monitor that process in close consultation with our filmmakers and television showrunners, talent and other stakeholders as we consider our future production options.”

Viacom said it expects the legislation to face “significant legal challenges.”

“We are closely monitoring the situation in Georgia and expect the legislation will be subject to significant legal challenges,” Viacom said. “Should the new law ever take effect, we will assess whether we will continue to produce projects in Georgia.”

AMC and CBS Showtime also expressed concerns over the law and mentioned the possibility of reconsidering where they’d take future business.

STX Entertainment CEO Robert Simonds reportedly told employees in an email that relocating STX production would hurt crew members. Although Simonds said STX does not believe the heartbeat bill accurately “represents the will of the people in Georgia,” the company will not be leaving the state.

“After thoughtful consideration about how best to move forward, we feel that relocating production would penalize the hundreds of talented crew members who would abruptly be out of jobs,” Simonds reportedly wrote in an email to employees, according to NBC. “In an effort to aid those on the ground fighting to reverse this legislation, STX will be making a donation to the ACLU of Georgia. Should HB 481 ever officially come into effect, we will reassess filming any future projects in the state.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The post These Are the Hollywood Studios Threatening to Boycott Georgia Over Pro-Life Law appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/