Posted on

Teen Who Said There Are Only Two Genders Expelled from School, GoFundMe Shut Down

A Scottish 17-year-old who was suspended for filming his teacher telling him that he could not say in class that there are only two genders has been told he cannot return to his school.

The Aberdeenshire pupil, named Murray, had shared the video to social media because, according to a friend, he wanted to expose the left-progressive, anti-scientific ideologies being taught at Scottish schools, and expressed concern that telling very young children that “boys are girls and girls are boys” is “a very dangerous thing”.

The viral footage revealed that the teen had been removed from class for stating that there are only two genders, with the teacher telling him that whilst the boy was entitled to his “opinion”, he could not share it at school because “the authority” and school policy dictated that there are many genders and to assert otherwise was “not acceptable” and tantamount to discrimination.

“I know what you think, and I know what the authority thinks, I know the authority’s point of view is very clear,” the teacher is heard saying.

Murray had been suspended for one week, according to the school on grounds of sharing the footage of his teacher without his consent, later tripled to three weeks. Now, the pupil has been told that he will not be able to return to Mearns Academy to finish his education, the Evening Standard reports.

The teen told a YouTuber who goes by I, Hypocrite — who helped the original story go viral — that he and his mother had been called in for a meeting with school where he said “people higher up [in the school] said it’s not OK for me to finish my education at that school, effectively, and they told me there’s no chance I can return.”

An Aberdeenshire council spokesman told the Evening Standard: “The young man in question has not been permanently excluded from Mearns Academy, but rather at the age of 17, has reached the end of his time in compulsory education.”

“Staff from the school are working hard to ensure that the young man has a positive future placement either in further education or in an area that he chooses,” they added.

The teen told the YouTuber that he was concerned that being barred from his old school could affect him getting into another one, particularly if a prospective new school requires a previous academic reference, saying: “I’m kind of in limbo at the moment. I really don’t know what is going to happen… I’m either going to have to find a new school or go to college… but it’s definitely a big speed bump in my life at the moment.”

A crowdfunding page was set up on Monday to cover getting him into a new school and living expenses, and raised more than $2,000 — before reportedly being shut down for breaching GoFundMe’s terms of service in an unspecified manner. The page address now shows the message: “Campaign Not Found.”

“So, GoFundMe has cancelled the campaign and also banned my account. I have not been given any reason other than I violated the terms somehow. All donations were refunded,” I, Hypocrite stated.

Last year, Scotland became the first country in the world “to have LGBTI-inclusive education embedded within the curriculum”.

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook: Breitbart London

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

Funny how death threats against mini-Ocasio-Cortez came just as Frederica Wilson called for prosecuting congressional ridicule

I was going to write this piece on the left’s ugly way of censoring little eight year olds who make fun of congressional members, such as the precocious Ava Martinez whose satirical impersonations of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are preternaturally brilliant. The child’s family got doxxed and death-threatened, and as a result, the little girl’s parents announced the shutdown of all the child’s social media accounts, whose videos have delighted conservatives. (A few can still be seen here and here.)

Image montage by Monica Showalter with shareable YouTube screen shot and public domain sourcing

It shows that the left is synonymous with censorship in every awful way – from social media censorship, to campus silencings, to the brutal attack on journalist Andy Ngo, to the gaslighting in the press about President Trump being the censor instead. But this sort of censorship, depriving all of us who enjoy these hilarious videos, every one of them a work of genius, is the worst.  The child is eight years old. Democrats have made a huge stink about the treatment of foreign eight year olds in illegal immigrant detention camps. Where’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s concern about this eight year old dealing with death threats and doxxing in a bid to ensure that lots of fear if not some death might happen? 

Actually, nowhere. But in light of this outrageous silencing of a child, something did come to light a couple days ago that gives one pause.

According to the Washington Examiner, Rep. Fredericka Wilson made this argument:

“Those people who are online making fun of members of Congress are a disgrace, and there is no need for anyone to think that is unacceptable [sic],” Wilson said during comments made Tuesday outside of the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children in Homestead, Florida.

“We’re gonna shut them down and work with whoever it is to shut them down, and they should be prosecuted,” she continued. “You cannot intimidate members of Congress, frighten members of Congress. It is against the law, and it’s a shame in this United States of America.”

What a coincidence. And maybe it was just a coincidence that this call to prosecute those who make fun of Congress, as if America is now Castroite Cuba, is just a coincidence that Mini-Ocasio was suddenly in for a surge of death threats in a bid to shut her down, same as would happen if prosecutions became the norm of the day.

And surprise, surprise: Wilson just happens to be an unusually close ally of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as I noted in December here.

Might this Wilson stunt have had Ocasio-Cortez more in mind than Wilson herself? Could the death threats and doxxings have actually come from some member of Ocasio-Cortez’s or Wilson’s political machines? It would be useful to know who did them and if I were an investigator, it’s one place where I’d look. We already know what kinds of people are in those congressional political machines, given the recent jail sentences meted out to a couple of Democratic congressional staffers over the doxxing of then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

There’s also certainly reason for Wilson to reciprocate: Last December, Ocasio-Cortez started something with General John Kelly in defense of her friend Wilson. She had nothing to gain from it, she just wanted committee seat assignments at the time and Wilson had ties to all the right people. I wrote about it here. At the time, Ocasio-Cortez was trying to demonstrate her loyalty to the touchy, egotistic Wilson, who by the way, wears ridiculous hats. Since then, Wilson has owed her one.

Wilson loudly called for censorship in prosecution form for making fun of congressional members, in an astonishing call to nullify the First Amendment. It was weird at the time and people assumed it was because people made fun of her hats. But now we see a little child targeted, first with threats, second with doxxing, all of which serve to silence in a far more brutal manner. So the timing here is really very strange. 

At a minium, we can surmise that congressional leftists are really very angry at anyone making fun of them, even a little kid. It’s important to note that Mini-Ocasio-Cortez was very very effective at her ridicule of Ocasio-Cortez and every leftist knows Saul Alinsky’s dictum that ridicule is a powerful tool. 

Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez, who’s not above talking out of turn on principle, as she did in her defense of Paul Manafort stuck on Rikers Island – is weirdly silent on this, from her ally, as a little kid disappears from the Internet based on death threats from people who clearly support her.

Yes, maybe a coincidence. But knowing that Wilson owes Ocasio-Cortez, I am not so sure. 

I was going to write this piece on the left’s ugly way of censoring little eight year olds who make fun of congressional members, such as the precocious Ava Martinez whose satirical impersonations of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are preternaturally brilliant. The child’s family got doxxed and death-threatened, and as a result, the little girl’s parents announced the shutdown of all the child’s social media accounts, whose videos have delighted conservatives. (A few can still be seen here and here.)

Image montage by Monica Showalter with shareable YouTube screen shot and public domain sourcing

It shows that the left is synonymous with censorship in every awful way – from social media censorship, to campus silencings, to the brutal attack on journalist Andy Ngo, to the gaslighting in the press about President Trump being the censor instead. But this sort of censorship, depriving all of us who enjoy these hilarious videos, every one of them a work of genius, is the worst.  The child is eight years old. Democrats have made a huge stink about the treatment of foreign eight year olds in illegal immigrant detention camps. Where’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s concern about this eight year old dealing with death threats and doxxing in a bid to ensure that lots of fear if not some death might happen? 

Actually, nowhere. But in light of this outrageous silencing of a child, something did come to light a couple days ago that gives one pause.

According to the Washington Examiner, Rep. Fredericka Wilson made this argument:

“Those people who are online making fun of members of Congress are a disgrace, and there is no need for anyone to think that is unacceptable [sic],” Wilson said during comments made Tuesday outside of the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children in Homestead, Florida.

“We’re gonna shut them down and work with whoever it is to shut them down, and they should be prosecuted,” she continued. “You cannot intimidate members of Congress, frighten members of Congress. It is against the law, and it’s a shame in this United States of America.”

What a coincidence. And maybe it was just a coincidence that this call to prosecute those who make fun of Congress, as if America is now Castroite Cuba, is just a coincidence that Mini-Ocasio was suddenly in for a surge of death threats in a bid to shut her down, same as would happen if prosecutions became the norm of the day.

And surprise, surprise: Wilson just happens to be an unusually close ally of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as I noted in December here.

Might this Wilson stunt have had Ocasio-Cortez more in mind than Wilson herself? Could the death threats and doxxings have actually come from some member of Ocasio-Cortez’s or Wilson’s political machines? It would be useful to know who did them and if I were an investigator, it’s one place where I’d look. We already know what kinds of people are in those congressional political machines, given the recent jail sentences meted out to a couple of Democratic congressional staffers over the doxxing of then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

There’s also certainly reason for Wilson to reciprocate: Last December, Ocasio-Cortez started something with General John Kelly in defense of her friend Wilson. She had nothing to gain from it, she just wanted committee seat assignments at the time and Wilson had ties to all the right people. I wrote about it here. At the time, Ocasio-Cortez was trying to demonstrate her loyalty to the touchy, egotistic Wilson, who by the way, wears ridiculous hats. Since then, Wilson has owed her one.

Wilson loudly called for censorship in prosecution form for making fun of congressional members, in an astonishing call to nullify the First Amendment. It was weird at the time and people assumed it was because people made fun of her hats. But now we see a little child targeted, first with threats, second with doxxing, all of which serve to silence in a far more brutal manner. So the timing here is really very strange. 

At a minium, we can surmise that congressional leftists are really very angry at anyone making fun of them, even a little kid. It’s important to note that Mini-Ocasio-Cortez was very very effective at her ridicule of Ocasio-Cortez and every leftist knows Saul Alinsky’s dictum that ridicule is a powerful tool. 

Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez, who’s not above talking out of turn on principle, as she did in her defense of Paul Manafort stuck on Rikers Island – is weirdly silent on this, from her ally, as a little kid disappears from the Internet based on death threats from people who clearly support her.

Yes, maybe a coincidence. But knowing that Wilson owes Ocasio-Cortez, I am not so sure. 

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Posted on

How to Stop Digitial ‘Fingerprinting’ Used to Track You Online

The New York Times recently published an article that details how advertisers use online “fingerprinting” to track users with up to 99 percent accuracy, and more importantly, how to prevent it.

The New York Times writes in an article titled “‘Fingerprinting’ to Track Us Online Is on the Rise. Here’s What to Do,” that advertisers are turning to invisible methods to track information about users and discover their identity, a practice that many may find intrusive and worrying. The Times goes on to discuss the rise in this practice and how users can prevent it.

The Times begins by explaining what fingerprinting is, stating:

What is it exactly? Fingerprinting involves looking at the many characteristics of your mobile device or computer, like the screen resolution, operating system and model, and triangulating this information to pinpoint and follow you as you browse the web and use apps. Once enough device characteristics are known, the theory goes, the data can be assembled into a profile that helps identify you the way a fingerprint would.

So how does fingerprinting work? How are these companies gaining access to users data collected through their cell phones and computers? The Times writes:

But fingerprinting collects seemingly innocuous characteristics that are generally shared by default to make apps and websites work properly.

With enough information gathered, fingerprinting can be very reliable. In a study last year in France, researchers found that about one-third of digital fingerprints they collected were unique and therefore identifiable. In a 2017 study, researchers at Lehigh University and Washington University tested a fingerprinting method that identified 99 percent of users.

How can Internet users protect against fingerprinting? The Times says that Apple has some of the best defenses:

  • Apple users have protections in Safari for computers and mobile devices.

    For those who use iPhones and Macs, Apple introduced a fingerprinting defense mechanism in its Safari browser last year. It basically makes many Macs and iPhones look the same to a website by sharing the bare minimum of information that the site need to load properly. (For example, if you are using MacOS 10.14.5, the browser will tell the website only that you are using MacOS 10.14.)

    To take advantage of this defense, just make sure you are running a recent version of the iPhone and Mac operating systems.

For Android users, experts suggest the Mozilla mobile browser, which included technology to block at least some of the data used to complete digital fingerprinting.

On other platforms like Windows computers, there are browser plug-ins that have similar features for Chrome and other browsers.

Now that we know more about how our private information is used to track and control our Internet experience, whether we consent or not, it is important to begin to protect our own privacy — we can no longer trust the Silicon Valley Masters of the Universe to do so.

Read the full report in the New York Times here. 

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or email him at lnolan@breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Posted on

Betsy Ross was a great American

Nike pulled a line of sneakers, Air Max 1 USA, after Colin Kaepernick reportedly complained that the Betsy Ross flag depicted on the heel of the shoes is an “offensive symbol because of its connection to an era of slavery,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

The ignorance bouncing around in the minds of America’s Left is intolerable. So now, poor Betsy Ross’ name is being dragged through the mud.

Betsy Ross was a great American who worked hard her entire life until she went blind, pulled herself up though being widowed three times, and did her best to live life during the most tumultuous time in our nation’s history. She was a true American unsung heroine.

Born a Quaker in 1752, Elizabeth Griscom was already a fourth-generation American. Her great-grandfather, a carpenter, emigrated to New Jersey from England and shortly thereafter moved to Pennsylvania to join the movement of Quakers. Quakers were opposed to war and marriage outside the faith; however, Betsy defied those constraints and married John Ross, an Episcopal man involved in the local militia.

John was the son of an assistant rector at Philadelphia’s Christ Church, the birthplace of the American Episcopal Church, where fellow worshippers included General George Washington and Benjamin Franklin.

Betsy and John were upholsterer apprentices, and her marriage to John caused her to be disowned by the Quakers. Regardless, the newlyweds opened an upholstery shop and prospered.

According to Historic Philadelphia’s website, the Rosses made bed hangings for General George Washington while he was in Philadelphia for the First Continental Congress in 1774. This is important because many websites today feature historians who consider the idea that Betsy Ross sewed the first real American flag impossible to corroborate and doubt she actually did. However, if the Rosses had George Washington as a client, it is more believable that he would appear two years later with John’s uncle, George Ross, to commission Betsy to make the new American flag.

I choose to believe the affidavit of her daughter given in 1871, describing Betsy’s making of the first flag and many flags thereafter.

The story of Betsy’s life is as intriguing as any in those days of insults and injury to a people who knew they could govern themselves and had to take a stand against the British. In 1774, Americans decried the Intolerable Acts instituted by Great Britain and boycotted British goods, while assembling militias and a network of resistance to the British oppressors.

In 1776, at the age of 24, Betsy became a widow when John was killed while serving in the local militia. In May or June, General George Washington, George Ross, and Robert Morris, known by Betsy to be a secret committee of Congress, the Committee of Three, met with the newly widowed Betsy and commissioned her to make the new American flag.

Betsy later married Joseph Ashburn, a sea captain whose ship was seized by the Brits, and he would die in a British prison. The couple had two girls. A fellow prisoner and family friend, John Claypoole, became Betsy’s third and final husband, whom she married at 31 years of age. They had five more daughters.

All the while, Betsy kept her upholstery business going. She was an entrepreneur, a skilled tradeswoman, and a strong American woman who nurtured her family, not unlike millions of Americans now.

Betsy’s eyesight failed in her later years, perhaps due to the arduousness of sewing by hand her entire life in poor light. She was completely blind for the final three years of her life and died at the age of 84 in 1836.

Betsy Ross has become a legend. She was a friend and fellow churchgoer of General George Washington; she was widowed at the tender age of 24 in a revolution that meant either victory or death for many. Perhaps it was John Ross’ vigor in defending his American way of life that set Betsy against her pacifist community. Perhaps Betsy felt the undying love of country and freedom that so many Americans still feel today.

Here we are in 2019, defending our American way of life against enemies within. The American Left spends most of its time trying to denigrate our nation’s Founding and boiling down years of monumental historical acts to focus solely on the scourge of slavery.

If it were not for the American Revolution, slavery would have existed even longer in this nation. If it were not for the belief as defined in our Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, slavery would never have been addressed. It is upon the shoulders of the resolute in 1776 that we are able to soar today.

And the people like Kaepernick who are propagating lies to sell their Alinsky agitation are only causing strife to upend that glorious American Revolution.

Fly your flags and remember Betsy Ross this Independence week, Americans, and never give an inch to those seeking to take away the freedom and liberty that so many have died to achieve and defend.

The post Betsy Ross was a great American appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com

Posted on

Trump, RNC Completely CRUSH Democrats In Second Quarter Fundraising

President Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee absolutely crushed the president’s prospective Democratic opponents in second quarter fundraising, according to internal reports from both entities.

Late last week, candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination began announcing their second quarter fundraising hauls, and for the most part, they seemed impressive.

South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg — still a surprise contender for the nomination — took in more than $24 million in March, April, and May, tripling his first quarter haul of around $7 million. Former Vice President Joe Biden hasn’t released official numbers yet, but his take is believed to also be in the tens of millions, earned mostly through the high-dollar fundraisers he’s been attending instead of being on the campaign trail.

But late Tuesday, Trump’s campaign announced that the sitting president raised approximately $54 million for his re-election campaign during the second quarter — a number nearly matched by the Republican National Committee, which announced in a companion press release that it has taken in around $51 million.

That means the president has around $105 million in his war chest going into the second half of 2019 — far more than any of his Democratic contenders, and more than enough to demonstrate a solid base of support heading into the fall.

Better still, it appears the president has raked in most of his cash from small-money donors. The campaign lists 725,000 individual donations with an average contribution of $4.

It’s also important to note that the president’s fundraising efforts are just beginning; Trump has yet to engage in any serious fundraising strategy or make overt efforts to solicit major donations from high-money donors. In fact, the president’s official re-election campaign only kicked off late last month, so while the campaign has been collecting donations since Trump officially won his first term, real fundraising is only just starting in earnest.

All accounts seem to show the president will need everything he can get. So far, Trump is running neck-and-neck with the generic Democrat in key swing states like Wisconsin and Florida, and the Democratic Party is likely to learn from Hillary Clinton’s 2016 mistakes, even if Hillary Clinton has not. It’s unlikely any candidate will willfully ignore rust-belt swing states this time around, or cede Florida to the RNC.

But that said, the Democrats are still at a fundraising disadvantage, both individually and as a group.

A handful of the 20-something contenders for the Democratic nomination have been cagey about their second quarter takings. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders matched his first quarter, raising around $18 million, but that’s not nearly enough to keep him in a highly competitive race. Former Texas Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke told reporters over the weekend that he couldn’t remember how much his campaign had brought in during the second quarter — a sure sign that the one-time-wunderkind raised less than expected and may be on the verge of dropping out over lack of finances.

As a whole, the party is currently lagging behind, as well. Without a candidate or limited slate of candidates to rally behind, the Democratic National Committee won’t be able to effectively raise money for its own war chest — a big problem, especially considering that the DNC has had difficulty raising any money since losing to Trump in 2016. There’s no opportunity to set an agenda or target donors until the field is down from 20-plus candidates to five or six frontrunners.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Posted on

Before Nike’s Done Trashing the Betsy Ross Flag, They Need to See This Pic of Obama’s Inauguration

Apparently, one of the earliest iterations of the American flag is racist. Who would have thought? If you’re late to the party and haven’t turned on the TV or been on the internet in the last 48 hours, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick managed to get Nike’s special Fourth…

The post Before Nike’s Done Trashing the Betsy Ross Flag, They Need to See This Pic of Obama’s Inauguration appeared first on Conservative Tribune.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Posted on

Leftists Angry After Ruth Bader Ginsburg Praises Fellow Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh (VIDEO)


Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Wednesday praised fellow justice Brett Kavanaugh for appointing an all female staff.

Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee is the second woman in US history to be added to the Supreme Court.

As expected, the left was not happy about Ginsburg’s praise of Kavanaugh, a man who was unfairly smeared by the lying left during his confirmation hearings.

“There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term and it’s thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh whose entire staff are all women. All of his law clerks are women,” Ginsburg said.

“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men,” she said.

Of course there was a delayed applause by the liberals there who were in utter shock over Ginsburg’s praise of Kavanaugh.

WATCH:

Leftists continued to smear Kavanaugh and accused him of ‘hiring a harem’ because he’s a pervert.

Dianne Feinstein, Christine Blasey Ford and the lying media is responsible for these smears against Kavanaugh, a man who was never convicted of a crime, but still considered guilty in the public court of opinion over baseless accusations that he sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford at a decades-old high school party.

The post Leftists Angry After Ruth Bader Ginsburg Praises Fellow Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Posted on

Black Reporter Blows Liberals’ Minds, Sets Record Straight on Police Shootings & Black Suspects

In St. Louis, Missouri, Bonette Meeks was recently arrested for killing a police officer. Circumstances of the arrest went viral. Elliott Davis recounted the arrest Tuesday in a Facebook post that has more than 8,000 shares in roughly 24 hours. Davis, an African American investigative reporter for KTVI from St. Louis, took the opportunity to…

The post Black Reporter Blows Liberals’ Minds, Sets Record Straight on Police Shootings & Black Suspects appeared first on Conservative Tribune.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct

Posted on

Court may rule that you can call non-meat meat

What’s the harm, many of you said. So people are creating fake meat out of genetically modified enzymes from soy roots. And they’re supposedly making it juicy and creating it to taste almost like actual meat. Why panic? Nobody is making us eat it, right?

Don’t say I didn’t warn you. The vegans are on the march and they’re coming for our cows. And now they’ve gone to court and asked a judge to go along with their evil plans. In a recently filed suit out of Chicago, the plaintiffs are asking to have a Mississippi law struck down. The measure bans companies from calling their Frankenstein products “meat” and the plaintiffs are objecting that this is a violation of their freedom of speech. (CBS Chicago)

A federal lawsuit filed by a Chicago vegan food maker says Mississippi is violating free-speech rights by banning makers of plant-based foods from using terms such as “meatless meatballs” and “vegan bacon.”

The lawsuit was filed Monday by the Plant Based Foods Association and Chicago-based Upton’s Naturals Co., which makes vegan products and sells them in many states, including Mississippi.

It was filed the same day Mississippi enacted a new law that bans plant-based products from being labeled as meat.

Here’s one of the cunning plant-peddlers now, complaining about the law.

You see where this is going, right? If they can pull off some sort of bogus free speech argument, pretty soon they’ll be able to start pawning off their creations on an unknowing public and just start calling the Impossible Burgers meat. Or even beef. Meanwhile, all the cows will be loaded up and taken to no-kill shelters or something.

Not everyone is giving up without a fight, however. Louisiana just passed a new law demanding honesty in food labeling and it goes into effect next year.

In Louisiana, Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards has signed a law to keep veggie products from being called meat, non-rice products from being described as rice and sugar alternatives from being marketed as sugar. It becomes law in October 2020.

Thanks to Governor Edwards for trying to hold the line. And just keep in mind what some of these people are out there selling. Impossible Foods uses “heme” to make their monstrous creations look like the real deal. And what is “heme,” you ask? They provide an answer.

We started by using the heme-containing protein from the roots of soy plants. It’s called soy leghemoglobin. We took the DNA from soy plants and inserted it into a genetically engineered yeast. And we ferment this yeast—very similar to the way Belgian beer is made. But instead of producing alcohol, our yeast multiply and produce a lot of heme.

Makes your mouth water just reading the words, doesn’t it?

The post Court may rule that you can call non-meat meat appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com