“Where’s the Senate?” – Rudy Giuliani Joins Chorus of GOP Voters Wondering Why Senate Has Turned Its Back on President Trump

In January 2019 the Republicans with 53 members kept control of the United States Senate.

During the election Republicans promised to investigate the investigators.

Republicans were going to go after all of the corrupt Obama officials in the deep state who were spying on President Trump during his campaign, the transition period and his presidency.

This week we found out the Deep State is still spying on President Trump.  A CIA official filed a “whistleblower” report based on second-hand water cooler rumors about President Trump.  The partisan CIA operative then filed a complaint anonymously in the latest coup attempt on President Donald Trump.

 

After eight months Republican leaders in the US Senate have failed to call ONE WITNESS from the deep state to testify before their GOP led committees.

But they have called Donald Trump Jr. in to testify so they could harass and interrogate the president’s son some more.

So Where the Hell Are the Senate Republicans?

Why do they remain silent?  Where is the subpoena for Joe Biden or Hunter Biden to testify on their $1.5 BILLION pay-for-play scheme?  Where are the subpoenas for Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan, Hillary Clinton, James Clapper, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and the latest CIA whistleblower?

The Senate Republicans are AWOL as Democrats continue their coup to remove President Trump.

On Saturday Rudy Giuliani asked the same question, “Where’s the Senate?”

The silence of the Senate Republicans shows their support for the coup plotters.
Voters need to remember this moment.

The post “Where’s the Senate?” – Rudy Giuliani Joins Chorus of GOP Voters Wondering Why Senate Has Turned Its Back on President Trump appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

‘Derogatory’ Use of the Term ‘Illegal Alien’ and Threatening to Call I.C.E. on Someone is Now Illegal in NYC

In a stunning attack on free speech, New York City has now banned “derogatory” use of the term “illegal alien.”

The NYC Commission on Human Rights has also banned threatening to call Immigration and Customs Enforcement on someone.

A 29-page directive released by City Hall’s Commission on Human Rights on Thursday outlined “new legal enforcement guidance and actions against discrimination based on immigration status and national origin.” Violations of their new “hate” laws are punishable by fines of up to $250,000 per offense.

“‘Alien’ — used in many laws to refer to a ‘noncitizen’ person — is a term that may carry negative connotations and dehumanize immigrants, marking them as ‘other,’” the memo says. “The use of certain language, including ‘illegal alien’ and ‘illegals,’ with the intent to demean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons constitutes discrimination.”

The commission said that they are “currently investigating 4 cases involving discrimination based on threats to call ICE in order to harass, threaten, or intimidate a victim.”

One example of a hypothetical situation that would be a violation of their new rules is if a “hotel prohibits its housekeepers from speaking Spanish while cleaning because it would ‘offend’ hotel guests or make them uncomfortable.”

The New York Post reports that the “Commission on Human Rights made clear that the directive is, at least in part, a rebuke of federal crackdowns on illegal immigration.”

“In the face of increasingly hostile national rhetoric, we will do everything in our power to make sure our treasured immigrant communities are able to live with dignity and respect, free of harassment and bias,” Carmelyn Malalis, the agency’s commissioner, told the Post.

While the new laws were being released, the NYC mayor’s office also announced a joint $1 million investment with the state to provide legal services to illegal aliens facing imminent deportation.

The post ‘Derogatory’ Use of the Term ‘Illegal Alien’ and Threatening to Call I.C.E. on Someone is Now Illegal in NYC appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Car Breaks Down Outside Coffee Shop, Homeless Man Decides To Help Change Woman’s Tire

After a woman’s tire blew in Ogden, Utah, an unlikely good Samaritan lent her a hand — a homeless man named Chuck.

The owners of the coffee shop across the street witnessed the heartwarming exchange and posted it on Facebook as a reminder that “those people” don’t deserve the labels so easily cast upon them.

Anna Davidson beamed as she watched Chuck go out of his way to help the woman with her tire and was so moved that she felt obligated to share the moment with others.

Davidson knows Chuck because he often works at her and her husband’s coffee shop, Jessie Jean’s. Ron and Anna Davidson allow him to do work around the shop to earn his next meal, according to KSTU.

Chuck has been in and out of prison from early on in his life, but now, at 56, he is on a new path.

TRENDING: Rush Limbaugh Says ‘Blowback’ Is Already Happening Against Democrats over Impeachment Push

He largely credits Ron and Anna Davidson for helping him start out on that new path.

“I wouldn’t be right here, right now, talking to you, if wasn’t for them two,” he said through tears.

The Davidson’s investment in Chuck is surely making a difference based on the kind act Anna witnessed on Sept. 23.

“Looked out the window to see this happening. This is Chuck,” Anna wrote on Jessie Jean’s Facebook page. “He’s homeless and works his a– off helping every day in the cafe.”

“This is ‘one of those people’ that get labeled. Ya know the ones everyone wants outta sight, outta mind,” she continued.

“I didn’t see anyone else out helping this young lady, just Chuck.”

Anna told KSTU she hoped the moment would help others see the person behind the judgmental labels that are often too quickly thrown on homeless people.

“I just wanted them to put a face to who they are judging,” she said. “Like, ‘Hey, here you go, that’s one of those folks you want us to hide away somewhere where we can’t see them.’”

RELATED: Woman Reportedly Takes Group of Homeless People to Dinner at Taco Bell and Gets Kicked Out

Helping those in need is a regular rhythm; the Davidsons feed about 20 homeless people thanks to “pay it forward meals” each week.

For only $6.25, other patrons can buy a meal for someone else who needs it.

Ron is especially passionate about helping those in need because he has experienced that hardship himself. According to KSTU, he was homeless for two years.

“I know what it’s like to be out there when it’s cold, I know what it’s like to be out there when it’s hot, I know what it’s like to be out there hungry,” he said.

Anna’s post has since gained the attention of thousands on social media, but she hopes that those people will think the next time they pass judgment on a homeless person.

“We need to look at each person’s story one by one and start seeing people for who they are, people,” she said.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Watch Nadler and Biden Rail Against Impeachment Back When Their Party Faced It

There has been no shortage of tough talk from prominent Democrats on the topic of impeachment following House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s decision to officially characterize the existing congressional investigations against President Donald Trump as part of a formal impeachment probe.

From 2020 Democratic presidential primary candidates to longtime congressmen — from moderately bipartisan Democrats like former Vice President Joe Biden to the radical progressive members of “the squad” — it was made clear this week that impeachment had become the unanimous party line.

The only difference is that, unlike Rep. Rashida “Impeach the Motherf—–!” Tlaib of Michigan and her band of freshman impeachment zealots, a great many of these tough-talking impeachment supporters have not been long for the cause.

In fact, some were singing exactly the opposite tune just a few presidential administrations ago, when former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his impassioned Republican revolutionaries sought to impeach then-Democratic President Bill Clinton.

House Judiciary Chairman Nadler, for example, has spent a significant amount of time pressuring Pelosi to pursue the unpopular measure — even as the Russian collusion narrative fizzled out entirely with the release of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

TRENDING: Rush Limbaugh Says ‘Blowback’ Is Already Happening Against Democrats over Impeachment Push

“Personally, I think the president ought to be impeached,” Nadler said less than two weeks ago, according to Politico, around the time that Pelosi declared in a closed-door meeting the party lacked the votes for impeachment.

“This is formal impeachment proceedings,” Nadler told CNN in August. “We are investigating all the evidence, we’re gathering the evidence.”

“We will at the conclusion of this — hopefully by the end of the year — vote to vote articles of impeachment to the House floor,” he added.

But a much different side of Nadler can be seen in a 1998 video showcasing the New York Democrat’s feelings toward the impeachment push against Clinton, who had lied under oath about a sexual affair with a White House intern.

At that time, Nadler saw impeachment as a partisan process — the “undoing” of a duly elected president for purely political reasons.

“An impeachment of a president is an undoing of a national election,” Nadler at an anti-impeachment rally in 1998.

“And one of the reasons we all feel so angry about what they are doing is that they are ripping … asunder our votes,” he said. “They are telling us our votes don’t count and that the election must be set aside.”

Of course, now the impeachment of a duly elected president is simply justice at work and nothing more — at least that’s how Nadler sees it.

RELATED: Jon Voight Declares ‘This Is War,’ Calls Trump ‘Highest Noble Man’ in Viral Video Sure To Offend All of Hollywood

Do you think pro-impeachment Democrats are nothing but partisan hacks?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

And Nadler is far from the only Democrat to have flip-flopped so strongly on the issue of impeachment.

Biden, though not so staunch in his support for the measure in recent weeks, was set firmly in opposition to it as a senator during the Clinton administration.

“The American people don’t think that they have made a mistake by electing Bill Clinton,” Biden said in 1998.

“And we in Congress had better be very careful before we upset their decision, and make darn sure that we are able to convince them if we decide to upset their decision that our decision to impeach him was based upon principle and not politics.”

The same standard is less of a concern for the Delaware Democrat these days as his fellow partisans seek to unseat Trump — a man who won the office of the president by promising to raze the works of the administration in which Biden was vice president.

Still, let’s give Biden a break. He can’t seem to remember where he is or who the last president was half the time anyway.

As for Nadler and the rest, however — they’ve shown themselves to be nothing more than partisan hacks.

Nadler and his ilk lack any semblance of honor, decency or respect for the United States Constitution.

Having used it as a shield to defend their man in 1998, they would seek to burn it for an opportunity to unseat a president they disagree with today.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

BLM Screams for Justice for Man Killed by Cop, but Bodycam Video Shows Justice Already Done

Five years ago, the death of Michael Brown inspired the “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” line.

That’s because witnesses had claimed Brown, who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, put his hands up and told police not to shoot.

All over America, the slogan and gesture became emblematic not only of the Black Lives Matter movement but of a burgeoning left-wing indictment of law enforcement as systematically biased against and violent toward young black men.

There was one problem, though: It was all complete fiction. Michael Brown had done nothing of the sort.

Instead, he’d attacked a police officer. That’s how he ended up dead — not because of prejudice or improper use of force.

TRENDING: Report: As Warren Closes Gap, Major Dem Donors Say They’d Rather Support Trump

Five years later, activists haven’t learned a whole lot. In St. Paul, Minnesota, protesters organized by a number of groups — including the local Black Lives Matter chapter — are protesting the death of a 31-year-old man who was killed by police Sept. 15.

Was he unarmed? Well, no, he had a knife on him. In fact, body camera video shows he charged at the officer who shot him. He was given repeated warnings to drop the knife.

And, after all that, he ended up dead.

Protesters, meanwhile, want “justice.”

Do you think this shooting was justified?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“Dozens of people marched Sunday evening from a St. Paul police station to the spot where a Little Canada man was shot and killed by an officer last week, where they spoke against police violence at a candlelight vigil,” the Twin Cities Pioneer Press reported Sunday.

The event was organized by a number of groups including Black Lives Matter Twin Cities Metro, Communities United Against Police Brutality, Twin Cities Coalition for Justice 4 Jamar, Justice4MarcusGolden and Justice for Justine Damond Ruszczyk.

“Ronald Davis, 31, was fatally shot by Officer Steven Mattson last Sunday during an encounter at Thomas Avenue and Griggs Street,” the newspaper reported.

“Davis rear-ended Mattson‘s squad car when the officer was stopped at a stop sign, according to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, the agency conducting the investigation,” the story continued. “Both men exited their vehicles, and Davis brandished a knife and ignored repeated commands to drop it, the BCA said in a statement. During the confrontation, Mattson fatally shot Davis.”

Even though the officer’s body camera footage was to be released later that week, protesters still weren’t going to wait for the facts to lambaste law enforcement over the shooting.

RELATED: Race Baiters Attack Group That Helps Chicago Youth Quit Gangs After NFL Partnership

“Enough is enough,” activist and civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong said at the event.

“This man should still be alive,” she added. “I don’t care what happened in that car situation.”

Perhaps she should care. When the body camera footage was released on Tuesday, it showed that Davis was clearly intent on attacking Mattson and presented a clear and imminent threat to the officer’s life.

“As soon as Mattson exited the vehicle, Davis can be seen charging straight at him with what police identified a knife in his hand,” NBC News reported Tuesday.

“Mattson immediately moved back as the 31-year-old man continued to swipe at him with the knife, and at one point Mattson fell to the ground.”

In the video, Mattson can be heard repeatedly warning Davis to ditch the weapon: “Drop the knife. Drop the f—ing knife,” he says.

The body camera footage can be see below.

WARNING: The following video contains graphically violent images that some viewers may find disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised.

St. Paul Police Chief Todd Axtell said Mattson had “no choice but to defend himself.”

“While I recognize the trauma that has been caused by a history of policing practices throughout our country, that have disproportionately affected communities of color, I cannot stand by — I simply can’t sleep at night — knowing that a good officer and all of our officers are being assailed by people who simply do not have the facts,” Axtell told reporters.

“I look forward to moving forward together with our entire community and in good faith to achieve the outcomes that we all desire.”

The problem is that only works if the entire community is grounded in reality.

KARE reported during the protest that several of the protesters didn’t even believe that Davis had a knife. This was before the body camera footage was released, but that still shows a remarkable amount of credulousness by activists who simply didn’t want to acknowledge the facts.

But that’s how it always is with activists’ narratives regarding police shootings.

If the facts don’t fit, they don’t exist at all. Davis wasn’t a threat. He may not have even had a knife. Hands up, don’t shoot. The fallacies, as always, will live on even after the facts have come out.

The Pioneer Press’ article shows one of the signs at the rally: “Delay of justice is justice delayed.”

Nope. Davis got his justice on Sept. 15.

He attacked a police officer with a deadly weapon and ended up dead. That’s what happens when you do that.

When activists cover for people who are killed after violently attacking police, they’re teaching everyone the wrong lesson.

Nobody wants to see someone end up dead.

However, all of the narrative-building in the world can’t change the fact that Ronald Davis was the sole author of his own demise.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Italian Scientist Who Studied Link Between Pizza and Decreased Cancer Risk Wins Eccentric Award

Lifestyle News

Italian Scientist Who Studied Link Between Pizza and Decreased Cancer Risk Wins Eccentric Award

Fresh Homemade Italian PizzaV. Matthiesen / ShutterstockFresh homemade Italian pizza. (V. Matthiesen / Shutterstock)

By Kim Davis
Published September 28, 2019 at 9:47am

An Italian scientist has determined that eating pizza made and consumed in Italy may be beneficial to your health, confirming your hunch that your heart, soul and stomach belong in the Mediterranean.

Dr. Silvano Gallus, an epidemiologist in Milan, has made headlines for his research work indicating that pizza may prevent illness — provided the pizza is Italian through and through.

On Sept. 12, at the 29th First Annual Ig Nobel Prize ceremony held at Harvard University, Gallus received an eccentric award for his unusual research: the Ig Nobel prize.

The playful award, given by the Annals of Improbable Research magazine, is designed to give people a reason to chuckle and inspire thoughtfulness.

TRENDING: Report: As Warren Closes Gap, Major Dem Donors Say They’d Rather Support Trump

The Improbable Research program exists to “honor achievements that make people LAUGH, and then THINK [and] to celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative — and spur people’s interest in science, medicine, and technology.”

Gallus’ award came after he published three papers between 2003 and 2006 that suggested pizza made and consumed in Italy may reduce the risk of heart attacks and different types of cancer.

Gallus was quick to point out that Italian pizza in and of itself is not the shining star health food that saves lives, but is indicative of how people in Italy regularly eat — a Mediterranean diet, which typically includes fish, olive oil, tomatoes and fresh vegetables.

“What did we find in our research? We found that analyzing data from a combination of large Italian epidemiological studies, we found that people who regularly consumed pizza had a decreased risk of digestive cancer and myocardial infarction,” Gallus said during his speech, Fox News reported.

“Our interpretation is that pizza may represent a general indication, a marker, of the Italian diet that, as other Mediterranean diets [have], has been shown to have major health benefits,” Gallus said.

“In conclusion, we recommend eating Italian pizza, but please, please hold the pepperoni for health reasons.”

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Migrants Set up Favela-Like Camp Steps Away from Roman Colosseum

Around 50 illegal migrants have set up a makeshift camp in Rome’s Colle Oppio park, only steps away from the iconic Roman Colosseum.

The camp, which is said to resemble a favela, contains illegal migrants primarily from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, with some even staying in archaeological sites, such as the ruins of the Domus Aurea villa of the infamous Roman Emperor Nero, Il Giornale reports.

The paper spoke to a migrant from Mali named Ibrahim, who claimed that around 50 migrants reside in the park in total and that he was angry and would prefer to return to his home country.

Another migrant, a Pakistani, told the paper that other migrants “rob me all the time” and showed off his sharpened screwdriver saying: “I swear that if they try again I will kill someone.”

While the park is incredibly close to one of Rome’s main tourist areas, it has been plagued for years by homelessness and criminality.

Only two years ago, an American tourist was sexually attacked by a migrant from Africa who initially asked her for a cigarette and then proceeded to try and drag her into a nearby bush.

Valentina Salerno of the Citizens’ Committee of Colle Oppio expressed concern that such incidents could reoccur saying, “Many people are mentally ill from the psychiatric point of view, because of their difficult past, for the conditions they find here, and for how they are forced to live.”

The area is not the only part of Rome that has become a hub for illegal migrant criminal activity.

The city’s main railway station Termini is also known as a hotspot for illegal migrants, with a Moroccan man arrested in the area in April of this year for stabbing a homeless man because he was wearing a crucifix necklace.

Only months before, two illegals from Egypt were arrested in the same area after they brutally beat up and tried to rob a woman in her 60s.

Follow Chris Tomlinson on Twitter at @TomlinsonCJ or email at ctomlinson(at)breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Vegans Threaten to Sue over Policy of Serving Milk to Nursery Tots

Vegans are threatening to sue the government for not providing a plant-based alternative to milk in its Nursery Milk Scheme.

The government scheme provides one-third of a pint of milk daily to every child under the age of five in nursery school, but the Vegan Society claims the government’s lack of a plant-based alternative to cow’s milk is “discrimination”, according to The Mirror.

The Vegan Society wrote in a letter to the government that they would be taking it to court unless children on vegan diets are offered a fortified plant-based “milk” under the scheme, writing: “Public authorities are under a general duty under the Equality Act 2010 to avoid discrimination by limiting the Nursery Milk Scheme only to cow’s milk, the Department of Health is failing in that duty.”

Campaigns manager at the charity Mark Banahan claimed that “vegan children are unfairly treated”, lamenting that parents have to buy their own “plant milk” for them, “something that is not always possible for low-income families and causes a great deal of inconvenience to families who should be entitled to free milk alternatives”.

The European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) had said in May 2017: “Studies have shown that children who follow a vegan diet are leaner and smaller than those children who consume meat or those who have vegetarian diets.”

Attending the 50th annual meeting of the ESPGHAN, Mary Fewtrell, a professor of Childhood Nutrition at University College London, had warned of the dangers of young children being fed a vegan diet without proper supplementation and advised parents to strictly follow doctors’ guidelines.

Professor Fewtrell said: “It is difficult to ensure a healthy and balanced vegan diet in young infants, and parents should understand the serious consequences of failing to follow advice regarding supplementation of the diet.

“The risks of getting it wrong can include irreversible cognitive damage and, in the extreme, death.”

In May 2019, parents in Sweden were jailed for putting their toddler on a strict vegan diet that left her malnourished, almost killing her.

Vegan activists have called for their dietary choice to be deemed a protected characteristic — such as sexuality, gender, age, or race — and discrimination against it an offence, with three philosophers speaking to Quartz last year saying it should be given the same legally-protected status as religion.

Utilitarian philosopher at Princeton University Peter Singer said veganism was “a sounder belief than any of the religions” which “rests on a strong moral foundation. It’s clearly a deep belief, it affects your life and the way you behave and outlook on the world, and I think should count as philosophical belief.”

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook: Breitbart London

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Democrat Former CIA Officer: Impeachment Inquiry Sets ‘Horrific Precedent’

House Democrats who are moving ahead with an impeachment inquiry on President Trump have set a “horrific precedent,” said Democrat former CIA officer Bryan Dean Wright.

“Now the American people are being told we’re going to impeach the president … but guess what America, you can’t ask any questions of any of these people because they have certain protections,” Wright said during an interview on Fox & Friends Friday.

“That’s a sham; that doesn’t make any sense. That is an effort ultimately to kneecap … the president of the United States. This president or any other president, it is a horrific precedent,” he concluded.

The former CIA officer said that if the “whistleblower” is being used in an effort to try and remove President Trump, the individual should be forced to testify before Congress.

“You better stand up and do it publicly,” said Wright. He also criticized House Democrats for moving forward without gathering all of the facts.

“This isn’t about trying to get facts. We’ve already decided, as a partisan Democratic Party. I’m sorry to say, we’ve already decided we have to get rid of the president. We’re moving forward with it, irrespective of facts. That is clear.”

On Friday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) claimed, without evidence, that Russia was involved in the phone conversation in July between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“I think Russia has a hand in this, by the way,” Pelosi said during an interview on MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

She continued:

We saw what the Russian disruption of our election last time, their interference, 100% confidence of the intelligence community, high confidence in the intelligence community, that the Russians disrupted our election. That was wrong. The integrity of our elections is central to our democracy. So what the president did in inviting outside intervention into our election, it goes beyond the pale.

On Saturday, President Trump criticized Democrats on Twitter for focusing all of their efforts on impeachment:

On September 21, Breitbart News reported that Congressional Republicans defended President Trump against the Democrats and the accusations made by the “whistleblower.”

“It’s not like we haven’t seen this movie before,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).

“Democrats come out, they’re all spun up, Adam Schiff makes all kinds of statements, and then when the facts come out — Whoa, different story! This seems to be the same kind of deal,” he concluded.

However, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said Friday that she hopes the impeachment inquiry will be completed before 2020 primary voting begins in February.

“Do you think it’s important that all of this be wrapped up before voting begins in February?” CNN’s political correspondent, MJ Lee, asked Warren on Friday’s broadcast of OutFront.

“Oh, I hope that it is. I’d like to see us get to the bottom of this as quickly as possible,” she replied.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Hundreds of Yale Students Abandon Class to Protest Climate Change

Hundreds of students at Yale University abandoned their classes this week in an attempt to draw attention to climate change.

According to a report by the Yale student newspaper, hundreds of students abandoned their classrooms on Wednesday afternoon to bring attention to the university’s financial relationship with companies that have been accused of negatively impacting the environment through their business practices.

During the protest, Yale student Peter Steinmann read a list of demands directed at university officials. The students’ primary demand involves selling off the university’s financial interests in fossil fuel companies.

One student organizer of the demonstration estimated that as many as 1,500 Yale students participated in the “walk-out” protest. Some professors even allowed, or encouraged, their students to participate in the “walk-out” protest. Professor Sarah Mahurin was teaching “African American Autobiography” at the time of the protest. One student in her class claims that Mahurin permitted her students to leave class to attend the protest.

Yale officials claim that they do no invest in companies “that refuse to acknowledge the social and financial costs of climate change” and other that fail to take “economically sensible steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”

However, the report also notes that the Yale Investments Office has refused, on more than one occasion, to answers calls from student activists to divest their interest in fossil fuel companies.

According to a report on its website, the Yale Investments Office, which oversees the University’s almost $30 billion endowment, decided in 2014 and 2016 to retain its holdings in fossil fuel companies. Because of increased pressure from student groups, the Advisory Committee on Investor Responsibility, which is composed of students, faculty, staff and alumni, addressed the issue of Puerto Rican debt. But they found that divestment “is not warranted when an investor is abiding by the applicable legal framework.” In the ACIR’s January 2018 decision, they added “there have been no allegations of unethical debt collection efforts or practices.”

Stay tuned to Breitbart News for more campus updates.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com