Trump’s EPA Rolling Back Obama-Era Anti-Coal Regulation

The Environmental Protection Agency will propose easing rules on disposal of coal ash, the residue from burning coal, to make it less likely the federal government would shutter a coal-fired utility plant, in an announcement set for Monday.

The move is part of what has been a larger deregulation push by the Trump administration to roll back strict Obama-era regulations that the industry viewed as the previous administration’s “war on coal,” that pushed to shut down many coal-fired power plants. 

“The EPA is no longer picking winners and losers in electric generation,” Peter Wright, assistant administrator for EPA Office of Land and Emergency Management, told reporters in a conference call Friday.

Coal ash is frequently recycled, and used as material for wallboard and concrete. Thus, according to the EPA, the rule could provide more resources for building the nation’s highways and for agricultural purposes. Coal ash reuse also conserves natural resources and provides viable alternatives to disposal, the agency contends.  

“This demonstrates our support for reuse of coal ash,” Wright said.

More than 500 units at approximately 260 coal-fired facilities may be impacted by Monday’s proposed rule, according to the EPA. 

In 2015, the Obama administration’s EPA imposed a regulation for disposal in landfills and impoundments of coal ash, specifying inspection, monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements.

However, in 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit threw out certain provisions of EPA’s 2015 final rule and remanded it back to the agency. 

To respond to the court’s ruling, the Trump administration proposed amendments to the closure provisions in the 2015 regulations for the disposal of coal ash. 

The EPA notes the new rule has the environmental benefit of reducing coal ash disposal in already crowded landfills. Almost two-thirds, or 64%, of coal ash produced in 2017 was recycled, the third consecutive year that more than half of coal ash in the United States was recycled. 

The agency says the revisions have the economic benefits of increased revenue from the sale of coal ash, and savings from using coal ash in place of other more costly materials. 

Most of the 2015 rule remains in place and the implementation is on schedule with regards to monitoring of groundwater and public reporting data, according to the EPA. 

Last year, the agency approved Oklahoma’s coal ash program. It has proposed certifying Georgia’s plan, which is still awaiting final approval.

The EPA has also been in discussions with about 20 states, which represent approximately 70% of surface impoundments. Wright said these states in discussion with the agency are largely in the Midwest and Southeast. 

Congress passed the 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which among other things, gave states the authority to operate coal ash management permit programs in lieu of the federal requirements, so long as the EPA determines that the state’s requirements are as protective as the federal standards.

The EPA classified coal ash as solid waste, which makes it subject to more flexible regulations than hazardous waste.

The post Trump’s EPA Rolling Back Obama-Era Anti-Coal Regulation appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Joy Behar Of ‘The View’ Says Trump Rallies Are Full Of Paid Actors (VIDEO)

There are some people on the left who will never understand Trump or the people who voted for him.

Joy Behar of The View is one of these people.

She is so blinded by her hatred of Trump, that she has convinced herself that the support shown by people at Trump rallies cannot possibly be real.

It’s sad.

News Busters reports:

Joy Behar: Trump Thinks His Voters Are Stupid; Rallies Are Fake, Full of Paid Actors

Just when you think things can’t get any more ridiculous on The View, the hosts spend time whining the President’s son’s Halloween costume is insensitive to animals. On Friday’s show, they also complained about a 2020 Trump campaign ad, which Joy Behar declared was full of paid actors “just like the ones who go to his rallies.”…

Afterwards, all of the hosts, saved for Miami resident Ana Navarro, cheered President Trump’s decision to move his home residence to Florida. Behar actually thought this would hurt President Trump, because New Yorkers didn’t like Trump so that meant Floridians wouldn’t either when he moved there, because #logic:

“When he lived in New York, New York did not vote for him. Now they’re going to get to know him a lot in Florida, they will not vote for him there either!” she gushed. The hosts went on to trash a 2020 Trump campaign ad against impeachment.

“There was not one black woman in that ad!” Hostin gushed, repeating “They couldn’t pay a black actress, enough money to be in it!”

Joy Behar claimed the ad was fake just like the people who go to his rallies: “To me that says that the Republican party thinks that their constituents are stupid because it says nothing. Those are all paid actors just like the ones who go to his rally.”

Watch the video (link here):

What a vile and stupid thing to say.

Does it ever occur to Behar that she is insulting half of the country on a regular basis?

Cross posted from American Lookout.

The post Joy Behar Of ‘The View’ Says Trump Rallies Are Full Of Paid Actors (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

SPIKED: ABC, CBS, NBC Skip Another New High in Jobs Numbers Under Trump

On Friday, there was another positive report on unemployment in America. While the unemployment rate rose a tick to 3.6 percent, the unemployment rate for African Americans nudged down to a record low 5.4 percent. Also, the total employment level jumped to 158.5 million, also a new high. So the network "newscasts" …skipped it entirely. ABC, CBS, and NBC offered nothing. The networks keep insisting unemployment data isn’t "real news." It’s somehow fake. PBS gave it 28 seconds.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

CRIMINAL DEEP STATE: Corrupt DOJ Admits FBI LOST AND DESTROYED Original 302 Report from Michael Flynn Interview

The Justice Department on Friday responded to Flynn’s lawyer Sidney Powell’s motion to compel production of Brady Material and to hold prosecutors in contempt.

Sidney Powell filed a motion a couple weeks ago revealing that General Flynn was indeed set up by the FBI with an ambush, damaging leaks and altered 302 reports.

Powell revealed that former FBI lawyer Lisa Page EDITED General Mike Flynn’s 302 report, then lied to the DOJ about the edits.

A 302 summary report consists of contemporaneous notes taken by an FBI agent when interviewing a subject.

The DOJ on Friday argued in a surreply that Sidney Powell’s motion should be denied because there were “no material changes made after 2/10/2017 to the draft of the January 24 interview report.”

However, there is evidence to the contrary.

See below for all of the blue-lined insertions [e.g. Russian Ambassador describing a Russian response] are material, via Techno Fog:

The DOJ argued that “Even if an earlier draft of the [302] once existed, there is no reason to believe it would materially differ” from the agents’ notes.” — SERIOUSLY??

So where are the original FBI notes taken on January 24, 2017? The government is now saying if they exist, they wouldn’t be any different than the reports drafted 2 weeks after the ambush interview!

The Justice Department’s decision is that Peter Strzok’s notes were taken contemporaneously during his interview with General Mike Flynn on January 24, 2017.

Techno Fog points out that Peter Strzok’s handwritten notes are way too clean and lack shorthand (screenshot below):

In contrast, Special Agent Joe Pientka, who was with Peter Strzok in the Flynn ambush interview took notes that look like they were taken in real time (shorthand, messy):

And now this…

It appears the DOJ admitted in their surreply that the original 302 report by Strzok was lost or went missing. 

Here the DOJ argues that “even if the original STILL existed” meaning THE ORIGINAL 302 IS MISSING!

Via Techno_Fog:

And here they are admitting the evidence was destroyed.

So how does the premier investigative body in the world lose such an important piece of evidence?
They don’t.

The Flynn case should be dropped immediately.

And if Peter Strzok and these far left Deep State hacks walk free we will ALL KNOW there is no justice in America today.

The post CRIMINAL DEEP STATE: Corrupt DOJ Admits FBI LOST AND DESTROYED Original 302 Report from Michael Flynn Interview appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Activists Want to Abolish Your Kid’s Honors Classes, Cite ‘White Toxicity’ and ‘Supremacist’ Values of High Achievement

School systems across the country are seeking to abolish honors classes, teach how math has been used to oppress people, and let truant students into gifted schools. Advocates say the moves are aimed at diminishing an achievement gap between demographic groups.

In one county, a busing initiative led to a populist uprising and rare bipartisan unity. Parents spanning races and parties say they did not ask for the changes, but politicians are pushing them through anyway.

dailycallerlogo

Washington State

In October, Seattle Public Schools unveiled a “framework” to inject “math ethnic studies” into all K-12 math classes, teaching “how math has been and continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities of color.”

Students will be asked to “identify the inherent inequities of the standardized testing system used to oppress and marginalize people and communities of color” and “explain how math dictates economic oppression.”

“Why/how does data-driven processes prevent liberation?” it asks. “How important is it to be Right? What is Right? Says Who?”

The curriculum was pushed by the school district’s ethnic studies program manager, Tracy Castro-Gill, who on Oct. 19 tweeted a picture with her “Marxist ringleader” and said the “next step is matching ‘INDOCTRINATED’ t-shirts!”

“I am an educator of color in Seattle whose job is anti-racist work within the school district. Seattle is very white—nearly 70%. It’s also one of the most liberal cities in the US, and these liberal, white Seattleites hate being called racist, but the thing is—a lot of them are,” she wrote.

Though she was hired by the superintendent and the school board, Castro-Gill said criticisms of the math proposal from one board member’s Asian wife were racist. She also asked people to “help me push” the board and superintendent to oppose “rewhiting.”

Castro-Gill wrote on her blog that her mother is white and her father is Hispanic, but that she has a strained relationship.

“I’m fairly radical atheist and consider myself a far left anarchist who fights for racial justice,” she wrote. “My parents are both Trump supporting Republicans.”

She is also at odds with her child’s father after their child declared herself “nonbinary” after reading literature about transgenderism.

A spokesman for Seattle’s superintendent, Denise Juneau, did not return a request for comment.

Maryland

In Howard County, Maryland, the school board appears poised to proceed with a plan, drafted by an out-of-state consultant, to bus 7,300 students out of their neighborhood schools to adjust the distribution of impoverished students in each school—despite that no discernible constituency is asking for it.

The county council said its goal is to “address the achievement gaps by racial and socioeconomic factors.” The plan would move students based on how many receive free and reduced meals in those neighborhoods.

Additionally, Howard is the most-integrated school system in the state, the Baltimore Sun reported. But the county council’s resolution says any school with less than 40% white students is defined as segregated.

In Howard County, 39% of students are white, meaning that by its logic, if every school exactly reflected the racial makeup of the county as a whole, every school in Howard County would be segregated.

Resident Carl Manganillo testified Oct. 10 that the board had heard 2,500 comments with opponents outnumbering supporters of the plan 100-to-1.

“As far as I can tell, the only proponents of this plan are the politicians,” he said.

Asian, white, black, and Hispanic parents marched in the streets in massive protests. “I want to stay with my friends,” a fourth-grader pleaded. “Keep the ‘unity’ in community,” a black mother urged.

More than 80 people spoke at a hearing Oct. 7, and not one of them wanted the plan to proceed, CBS’ Baltimore affiliate reported.

Lori Grant, who is an assistant director at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission—the federal government’s anti-discrimination arm—and the mother of a black student in a Howard school, testified in her personal capacity that the school board should not proceed with the plan and that it is likely illegal.

“Basically, they could care less what the parents think,” resident George Henry said in a letter to the Baltimore Sun.

With parents overwhelmingly opposed, state politicians got in the mix—one cutting the line of people testifying—to attempt to push the county policy across the finish line.

In a Facebook group that quickly attracted 4,000 members, a near populist revolt fomented, with members pledging to vote every Howard politician out of office.

Larry Walker, a member of the Attendance Area Committee that helped form the plan, is also a pastor at Celebration Church, and said at a Sept. 8 service:

We have a partnership with the school system and the superintendent is looking for brown people to show up and put our voices behind this plan that he came out with—it’s a bold plan and the community is hatin’ on it right now—they’re hatin’ on it—so he needs … he needs some allies, folks.

School spokesman Brian Bassett did not respond to questions from The Daily Caller News Foundation about what kind of partnership the government has with a church, and why the superintendent was “looking” for people to support a plan rather than drafting one with organic public support.

New York City

In the nation’s largest school system, a panel appointed by the mayor proposed in August to eliminate the city’s gifted and talented schools and programs in the service of racial integration garnered front-page New York Times coverage.

The proposal would end the practice of gifted and talented schools screening students by exams and grades—and even block considering students’ attendance records at their previous schools.

It also said it was unfair that students who were not fluent in English were “underrepresented” in the most rigorous academic programs.

“If you get rid of testing, you’re open to subjective decision-making … you’ll see a lot of parents send their children to private schools, and you’re just furthering the income gap,” David Lee of the Chinese American Citizens Alliance told New York’s CBS affiliate.

Robert Cornegy, a black Democratic city councilman from Brooklyn, told the Times the proposal seemed to come from “uber liberals” and said minorities are not served well by taking the rigor out of education.

“If you eliminate the gifted and talented program it eliminates the chances of getting into specialized programs and institutions of higher learning,” he said. “Just like there’s a pipeline to prison, there is a pipeline to higher academic success and college.”

Jonathan Plucker, a professor at Johns Hopkins University and a member of the National Association for Gifted Children’s board, told the Times, “You can say everyone is being treated the same, but if they are being treated poorly, that’s a horrible form of equity.”

Still, New York schools chancellor Richard Carrenza said “this is not about lowering the bar.”

In May, three white school administrators sued Carrenza’s Department of Education for $90 million, saying, “DOE has swiftly and irrevocably silenced, sidelined and punished plaintiffs and other Caucasian female DOE employees on the basis of their race, gender and unwillingness to accept their other colleagues’ hateful stereotypes about them,” the New York Post reported.

LaShawn Robinson, then the executive director of the DOE’s Office of Equity and Access, said, “Values of white culture are supremacist,” according to the lawsuit. Robinson replaced Lois Herrera, a Harvard graduate who had worked for the schools since 1986, with a black man, stashed her belongings under a stairwell, demoted her three levels, and transferred her to the Bronx, it stated.

Another plaintiff, Jaye Murray, was forced to report her activities to the new boss every 30 minutes, it said. The third plaintiff, Laura Feijoo, was replaced by a black woman who did not have the necessary license to do the job, it stated.

Separately, a fourth white female former employee, Leslie Chislett, sued New York’s DOE for $20 million. Chislett had spearheaded a campaign to promote Advanced Placement classes for more students, but, “unfortunately, under Chancellor Carranza’s leadership, something has gone very wrong with the Equity and Excellence agenda,” she told the Post.

All DOE employees were forced to undergo “training” sessions that told them a desire for “excellence” was part of “white supremacy,” Chislett’s lawsuit stated.

“There is white toxicity in the air,” DOE senior executive Ruby Ababio-Fernandez said in a school presentation, according to the suit.

A spokeswoman did not return a request for comment.

Virginia

In Fairfax County, Virginia, the school board eliminated the position of chief academic officer and replaced it with chief equity officer. It also proposed revising the boundary-drawing process to remove “instructional effectiveness” and “the impact on neighborhoods” as factors, in favor of “the socioeconomic and/or racial composition of students.”

For 18 months, the board repeatedly discussed an imperative to gain “equity” in school demographics, but with an election Nov. 5, it suddenly sought to distance itself from the rhetoric.

The board is “not considering boundary adjustments at this time,” spokeswoman Kathleen Thomas told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The school system hired a consultant to study boundary changes in the context of its “equity” policy. Parent Laura Timmins told The Daily Caller News Foundation she suspects the board is looking to offload it onto a third party to shield politicians from blowback for moves that are unpopular with residents.

Prior to community uproar, the board seemed to recognize that residents would not be in favor of the plan, and that subtlety would be imperative.

Board member Karen Keys-Gamarra said in a school board meeting, “I have no problem with certainly alerting the community as gently as we can, because, like you, I’m not sure I want to hear about this for the next 10 years.”

When constituents from an area with a high-performing school told their school board member, Janie Strauss, that such changes could plummet their home values, Strauss flatly denied any changes were afoot. But she also told colleagues at a board meeting she had “warned” the school’s community that a “big chunk is going to be reboundaried.”

Board member Pat Hynes appeared to acknowledge that removing children from their schools in the name of racial integration would be for naught if the existence of rigorous honors classes still separated children based on test scores.

“Changing school boundaries must be primary tool of integrating schools for diversity. But equally important is ending counter-productive sorting-and-separating that creates segregated schools-within-schools. Goal = integrated classrooms,” she tweeted from a presentation at the National School Board Association’s 2019 conference.

In one school in Fairfax, 78% of students failed “plain English Algebra” and 30% failed a basic competency test in English, leading Timmins and other parents in the second-richest county in the U.S. to wonder how their children could apply to competitive colleges if they were required to take the same classes.

The racial focus of the 12-person school board—fueled by its eight white Democrats—led liberal residents to turn against the party, with one saying she’s cast ballots for Democrats in every election since 1971, but “when it comes to this year’s County level races, that will not happen.”

Minnesota

In July, Eastern Carver County, Minnesota—which is 87% white—revealed it had hired Muhammad Khalifa to do an “equity audit.”

It also hired Keith Brooks as director of equity, who compared himself to Trayvon Martin and said, “My questioning, or asking questions, or looking at things through an equity lens comes off as belligerent or angry.”

In protest against a board they perceived as being unresponsive to their constituency, some residents pledged to vote in November to deny a funding request the school system says is needed for a new school.

“Khalifa was paid $90,000, Dr. Brooks got $138,000, and you’re saying you don’t have enough money for education, then what are you spending it on this stuff for?” Lynn McHale, a member of Parents for D112 schools, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“There’s a girl who came home from school and cried and said, ‘I wish I wasn’t white,’ after she was exposed to this ‘equity’ stuff,” she said.

“The superintendents of the nearby jurisdictions have joined into a group called Reimagine Minnesota, and it’s pushing race,” she continued. She suspects it wants to “consolidate into one metropolitan school district, where they would bus inner-city kids from Minneapolis to the suburbs,” relating to a lawsuit called Cruz-Guzman. Reimagine Minnestoa says its purpose is a “collective action plan to address integration.”

Celi Haga, a school spokeswoman, told The Daily Caller News Foundation the school’s system was not fulfilling its mission “as long as the outcomes for groups of students are meaningfully different.”

At a contentious, standing room-only school board meeting, when residents voiced opposition to the increasing role of race in education, “they told us not to clap, that they would shut down the meeting.”

Some people who spoke in favor of the initiatives were teachers in the school system, taking up limited time from parents. McHale said teachers have been told not to voice criticism of the initiative.

“The way I view it is a coach should try to make everyone a better player, but you never hold someone back,” she said.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The post Activists Want to Abolish Your Kid’s Honors Classes, Cite ‘White Toxicity’ and ‘Supremacist’ Values of High Achievement appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Nation’s Report Card Shows Why We Should Get Washington Out of Education

Across the country, math and reading scores have continued a yearslong stagnation, with students largely showing no progress in academic achievement.

That’s one major takeaway from the 2019 National Assessment
of Educational Progress, released earlier this week by the National Assessment
Governing Board.

Often referred to as the Nation’s Report Card, the assessment tracks the progress of students in the fourth and eighth grade on reading and mathematics achievement, releasing those findings every other year.

The 2019 results were, overall, dismal.

Just one-third of students in the fourth and eighth grade reached proficiency in math and reading nationally.

Harvard professor Paul Peterson writes that “in the first decade of the 21st century, white, black, and Hispanic student performance was on the rise, but in the second [decade], those gains have ground to a halt, with even hints of decline in reading.”

For students who are among the lowest 10% of performers on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, their scores have dropped significantly since 2009, as Brown University professor Susanna Loeb points out.

The Urban Institute’s Matthew Chingos notes that, although the national assessment scores rarely fluctuate more than one or two points, eighth-grade reading scores declined four full points this time.

Ten points on the national assessment is the equivalent of roughly one grade level worth of learning. That means, as Chingos observes, that eighth-graders are reading at a level “comparable to their counterparts of 10-20 years ago.”

Borrowing
from Shakespeare, education researcher
Matthew Ladner

calls the scores for students with special needs an Agincourt-level disaster.

With a few exceptions—including in school choice leader Arizona—eighth-grade math scores for children with special needs saw major declines, as this chart from Ladner shows:

Notably, most of the states that saw gains in this area—Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Tennessee—have education choice options, specifically for children with special needs.

So,
what’s to be made of this great stagnation?

Taxpayers
have spent some $2 trillion on K-12 education programs at the federal level,
with a specific goal of narrowing achievement gaps between children from
low-income families and their more affluent peers.

These policies, launched as part of President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society push, have failed to move the needle on improved education options for students, as these newest scores further demonstrate.

Peterson writes in The Heritage Foundation’s new book “The Not-So-Great Society”:

The achievement gap in the United States is as wide today as it was in 1971. The performances on math, reading, and science tests between the most advantaged and the most disadvantaged students differ by approximately four years’ worth of learning, a disparity that has remained essentially unchanged for nearly half a century.

Federal per-pupil K-12 education spending has quadrupled in real
terms since the 1960s. The policies and programs launched by the Johnson administration as
part of the War on Poverty have not helped students, and neither have more
recent federal policies promulgated by officials in Washington.

As my colleague Jonathan Butcher and I write in “The Not-So-Great Society”:

What is to be done? In education, the first step to improving the quality of pre-K, K-12, and postsecondary learning options is a bold one: eliminating Washington’s involvement.

Education in the U.S. should return to its roots from the earliest days of the republic, when parents had a central role in choosing how and where their child learns …

From
the Great Society to No Child Left Behind to the Common Core national standards
advanced under the Obama administration,
Washington’s intervention in education has been a failure for students and
taxpayers alike.

It’s time to try a different approach.

The post Nation’s Report Card Shows Why We Should Get Washington Out of Education appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

DEVELOPING: Schiff’s CIA “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella May Be Implicated in Upcoming FISA Report

The complete list of anti-Trump CIA “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella’s ties to top Democrat operatives will SHOCK YOU!

CIA snitch Eric Ciaramella filed a whistleblower complaint on August 12 over President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky where the two discussed ferreting out corruption.  This included talk on investigating the Biden crime family.

** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciarmella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.

** Ciaramella  coordinated and took guidance from Adam Schiff’s staff and Schiff lied about it.

** Schiff’s staff recommended attorneys for the so called “whistleblower.”

** Ciaramella was kicked out of the White House for leaking negative stories about Donald Trump in 2017.

** Trump-hater Ciaramella was behind the fake story that Putin told Trump to fire Comey — a COMPLETE FAKE NEWS STORY from 2017!

** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.

** The attorneys for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.

** Ciaramella  worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.

** Ciaramella had no problem with the Joe Biden and Hunter Biden’s million dollar pay-for-play scandal with Ukraine.

** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.

** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.

But Eric Ciaramella may have more problems than just hiding his anonymity from the American public.
FOX News legal expert Gregg Jarrett wrote today that Ciaramella, who was mentioned in the Mueller report, may be implicated in the upcoming IG FISA report.

If this information is true, it is possible that this “whistleblower” could be one of the individuals who might need a defense lawyer in the coming weeks when the findings of the FISA report are made public. The reported direct relationship with James Brennan, the “Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election,” and Susan Rice makes them a likely candidate to be at the very least called as a witness in the cases that are likely to start following the FISA report. In addition, his area of expertise is reportedly Russia and Ukraine; two of the reported locations where information used in the anti- Trump Russian Dossier was “gathered.” The name that Real Clear Investigations revealed is also listed as a source in one of Robert Mueller’s footnotes in his report.

This means that with the Democrats starting the impeachment inquiry the “whistleblower” may be a witness, or a defendant, in a separate case where real evidence has been produced of criminal wrongdoing. In this case, their feelings, opinions, and rumors that they heard will not be important. The facts and potentially illegal actions that took place to start the witch hunt against President Trump will be concrete evidence that the Democrats and the media will be unable to spin politically.

Wouldn’t it be just perfect if Shifty Schiff’s “whistleblower” Mr. Ciaramella is caught up in the IG FISA investigation?

The post DEVELOPING: Schiff’s CIA “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella May Be Implicated in Upcoming FISA Report appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

UK: Historic ‘Little White Town’ Changes Signs After ‘Racism’ Complaints

The historic ‘Little White Town’ of Bideford in Devon, south-west England, is to change its signs over fears “the town council could be classed as a racist white supremacist [sic]”.

Bideford was dubbed “The Little White Town” by the Victorian author Charles Kingsley in the historical novel Westward Ho! more than 160 years ago, in reference to the many white buildings which give the town its character.

But town councillor and former town mayor Dermot McGeough complained that “The wording ‘Little White Town’ can be perceived as causing a racist slur and not politically correct” and should “be rectified immediately”. At a council meeting, he put forward a motion that “Following a number of complaints from parishioners, I propose that the words ‘Little White Town’ are removed from all signs within the town and at the town entrances”.

“If this wording is not removed, the town council could be classed as a racist white supremacist [sic],” McGeough warned colleagues, according to a local report by DevonLive.

A survey on this supposedly contentious issue found that 69 per cent of Bideford residents were in favour of leaving the town sobriquet unchanged, compared to just 31 per cent who thought it should change — so naturally, councillors voted in favour of changing it.

The town council did offer a sop of sorts to traditionalists like councillor Doug Bushby, who said the proposal was “political correctness gone mad”, by not dropping Bideford’s identity as “The Little White Town” entirely.  Instead, they decided that signs will now bear the rather clumsier moniker “Charles Kingsley’s ‘Little White Town’ (1855)” — to add “context”.

It has not been reported how much money will be squandered on the changes, but critics have questioned where the current mania for politically correct revisionism will end.

“[Town councillor] Peter Lawrence didn’t want to cause any offence but [I] did wonder where this might lead asking if ‘Bideford Black’ paint should be renamed ‘Bideford Slightly Dark’?” recounted Peter Christie, another town councillor, in a local newspaper column. (Bideford Black is a unique earth pigment mined in the area.)

McGeough’s efforts to alter Bideford’s identity showcase the determination of social justice-minded politicians to have their way on such issues. A previous attempt by town councillors to scrap ‘The Little White Town’ name in 2008 had failed in the face of local protests.

Follow Jack Montgomery on Twitter: @JackBMontgomery
Follow Breitbart London on Facebook: Breitbart London

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Liberal Washington Nationals Player Won’t Visit White House Due To Trump’s ‘Divisive Rhetoric’

As has been the trend among liberal athletes, a Washington Nationals relief pitcher won’t visit the White House with his teammates because of his disdain for President Donald Trump.

Sean Doolittle had previously remained silent on whether he would visit the White House upon winning the World Series when the prospect was merely a hypothetical. But now that the Nationals have won the title, Doolittle told The Washington Post that he would not visit the president of the United States.

“There’s a lot of things, policies that I disagree with, but at the end of the day, it has more to do with the divisive rhetoric and the enabling of conspiracy theories and widening the divide in this country,” Doolittle told the Post. It is unclear whether Doolittle would decline an invite from a Democratic president, who could just as easily be accused of “widening the divide in this country.”

“My wife and I stand for inclusion and acceptance, and we’ve done work with refugees, people that come from, you know, the ‘s—hole countries,’” he added.

Trump’s rhetoric on refugees was about how we needed to be sure who they were before we let them into our country, as many could be terrorists posing as refugees.

Doolittle also said he feels “very strongly about [Trump’s] issues on race relations” and the LGBT community. Doolittle’s wife “has two mothers who are very involved with the LGBTQ community,” the Post reported.

Trump is the first president to enter office supporting same-sex marriage, yet he has been painted as anti-LGBT. The claims are typically due to his picking Mike Pence as vice president. Pence is religious and believes in religious liberty, which is often at odds with LGBT beliefs. The Left paints religious people as hateful for their religious views.

Doolittle also criticized Trump for mocking a reporter who was disabled, saying he has an autistic family member.

“I have a brother-in-law who has autism, and [Trump] is a guy that mocked a disabled reporter. How would I explain that to him that I hung out with somebody who mocked the way that he talked, or the way that he moves his hands? I can’t get past that stuff,” Doolittle told the Post.

Doolittle was referencing Trump’s alleged mocking of New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski, who has difficulty moving his right arm and hand due to arthrogryposis. Liberal media outlets have maintained that video of Trump mocking Kovaleski shows him mocking the reporter’s disability. Investor’s Business Daily reported that this is how Trump mocks “the mannerisms of people, including himself, who are rattled and exasperated.” Previous videos of Trump show this. As IBD also reported, it didn’t make sense for Trump to mock a man with limited movement by thrashing his arms wildly. Yet the anti-Trump myth persists.

So far no other Nationals player has said they would not attend the White House event honoring their win. Doolittle responded to those who disagreed with his decision not to attend.

“People say you should go because it’s about respecting the office of the president and I think over the course of his time in office he’s done a lot of things that maybe don’t respect the office,” he said. “I don’t want to hang out with somebody who talks like that.”

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

SCOTUS allows Miami to sue BANKS for its economic and social woes

Every major city in America is now run by the hard Left, driven by extreme ideology rather than pragmatic policy outcomes. The result of sanctuary policies, the war on cops, the movement to abolish prisons, and rampant socialism is increasing crime, drugs, criminal alien gangs, homelessness, and poverty. But what happens when they have to face the music of a collapsing tax base? Real simple, according to the federal courts: Just blame the banks and make them pay.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court refused to stay lower court orders essentially holding Wells Fargo and Bank of America responsible for the socio-economic problems of Miami. In what was once considered an outlandishly frivolous but dangerous lawsuit, the Supreme Court has now fully embraced this radical judicial power grab that began several years ago.

In 2017, the high court ruled (Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami) that a failing city can essentially blame all of its financial, economic, and security woes on banks for discriminating against Hispanic and black borrowers with mortgages … by offering them loans they can’t afford! They were accused of predatory lending in order to generate foreclosures. The 5-3 decision demonstrated how the courts will grant standing based on the most absurd claims of injury and twist statutes beyond recognition (as well as the Constitution) in order to enact their social justice agenda. Thomas dissented and was joined by Alito and even Kennedy. But John Roberts joined the left-wing bloc of justices.



The case was sent back to the lower courts once the Supreme Court ruled that the city of Miami had valid standing. Previously, the district judge ruled that it had no standing, but was reversed by the Eleventh Circuit, a decision that was affirmed by Roberts and the four liberal SCOTUS justices. With the frivolous lawsuit continuing for two more years, the banks went to the Supreme Court to end this charade, but evidently, we don’t even have a majority to stop something this insane, after so much talk of the much-vaunted conservative Supreme Court.

Evidently standards, legitimate standing, proof of injury-in-fact, adherence to statute, due process, and all such jurisprudential norms don’t apply when the courts are seeking to make national policy in pursuit of social justice.

So banks have been placed in an untenable situation regarding protected classes. If they deny loans to individuals who can’t afford mortgages, they will be sued, assuming those individuals are not white. If they extend loans to people who can’t afford them, and the system collapses, they will be accused of predatory lending.

But it gets worse. How is there standing in this case? Did individual borrowers who were black or Latino sue the banks and demonstrate evidence of discriminatory practices in violation of the FHA? Not a chance. It was the city government of Miami that sued the banks under dubious accusations of discrimination. Where is the injury-in-fact? How is the city a party to a “dispute” over private mortgages?

Are you ready? The argument is essentially as follows: Racist banks offered mortgages to too many black and Hispanic borrows who couldn’t afford them, which led to default, which led to foreclosures, which led to vacant houses, which brought down the values of the adjacent homes, which led to reduced property taxes, which led to more criminal and social problems, which strained the local services (fire, police, inspectors, debris collectors, etc.).

You see, had the evil banks not insidiously lent to black and Hispanic borrowers who couldn’t pay (at the coercion of government), Miami would not have gangs, drugs, poverty, and urban blight. It would be a utopia.

Shockingly, the Supreme Court bought this zany line of thinking hook, line, and sinker in 2017 and is standing behind its merits now. It’s unclear how many justices agree, but at the very least we can deduce Roberts is still all in on the ultimate bank robbery.

This decision opens the door for every failed liberal city to blame the private sector for its increasingly troubling social and economic problems, place further mandates on business practices, and then hit private entities with lawsuits for doing exactly what was asked of them. This is exactly what cities like Philadelphia, Sacramento, and Oakland, are now doing to Wells Fargo.

In an era when courts are concocting new rights and alleging every social policy they dislike to be a violation of due process, this case will lead to a mass termination of due process for banks. There is no way a bank can ever ascertain ahead of time the chain reaction of cause and effect it might be liable for in the long run, according to failed blue-city politicians. The boundless liability also places banks in an untenable situation given that they are also pressured to go out of their way to lend to protected classes of people, even if specific individuals would not otherwise qualify for a loan.

This precedent on the issue of standing also creates numerous avenues for these same cities to sue all sorts of industries and private businesses for any other grievance under the sun, including even for the weather. This is happening in Baltimore. And guess what? The same “conservative” Supreme Court let this insane lawsuit proceed! All of this has a collective effect of distorting the market, raising the cost of business, and dragging down the economy.

Perhaps the most tragic part of this judicial fiasco is not even what it does to private companies but what it helps obfuscate for the failing cities. These endless shakedowns will have the effect of exonerating these very same big-city politicians of blame for the social, fiscal, and criminal justice policies that are truly fueling the urban blight.



The post SCOTUS allows Miami to sue BANKS for its economic and social woes appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com