WATCH: Tom Cotton On China: ‘I Have Never Trusted A Communist And I Never Will Trust A Communist’

On Thursday, Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) appeared on Fox News’  “The Story” with Martha MacCallum, who asked him if the United States could ever trust China again after their machinations regarding  the coronavirus, prompting Cotton to snap, “I have never trusted a Communist and I never will trust a Communist. That’s who runs China — the Chinese Communist Party.”

MacCallum started the segment by quoting from a FoxNews.com op-ed from Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro, who had written, “The Chinese government is chiefly responsible for the explosion of this pandemic . . . to trust the Chinese government after a global betrayal of this magnitude would not only be foolish, it would be immoral.”

MacCallum asked,“Does this fundamentally change our relationship with China and can we trust the government of China anymore?”

Cotton answered:

I have never trusted a Communist and I never will trust a Communist. And that’s who runs China, is the Chinese Communist Party. China doesn’t deserve to be trusted, as the president said; they unleashed this pandemic on the world. In early December, they knew that there was some kind of outbreak happening with the novel coronavirus in Wuhan.

If they had acted quickly, rather than lying to their own people, suppressing the whistleblowers, and lying to the world, then not only China but U.S. and other scientists and researchers and epidemiologists and other experts from around the world could have helped them contain this in Whuhan or in Hubei Province. Look what we have now: A pandemic and a severe global recession. Again, because of the Chinese Communist Party’s dishonesty, corruption, and incompetence.

MacCallum noted that in the early stages of the coronavirus, President Trump trusted the Chinese. She asked, “Can we ever work with them again?”

Cotton replied, “Simply because we can’t trust a Communist like [Chinese President] Xi Jinping doesn’t mean that we don’t have to talk with him. As Ronald Reagan said when we talked to Soviet leaders, ‘Trust but verify.’”

He continued:

So of course President Trump has to maintain open lines of communication with all of our adversaries around the world; however, we cannot trust China to continue to manufacture our pharmaceuticals, things like antibiotics and penicillin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen, so say nothing of dozens of other basic pharmaceutical ingredients.  That’s why I would say that the military, health and human services, meaning Medicare and Medicaid, the VA, can no longer buy drugs that are sourced from China and I would give incentives for companies to bring manufacturing of basic pharmaceuticals back to the United States.

MacCallum asked what differentiated Cotton’s bill from other bills with similar intent.

Cotton answered, “There’s a lot of different approaches; what we do is use the purchasing power of the entire United States government, every agency in the United States government that buys pharmaceuticals at scale.  We don’t say, ‘Study the problem,’ we don’t say, ‘Form a commission and get back to us,’ we just tell them within a certain time, stop buying these drugs.  And at the same time we provide incentives so we can start making those drugs here.”

Video below:

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Adam Schiff Doesn’t Want You To Know About His Impeachment Subpoena Records

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has led the charge against President Donald Trump since he was inaugurated, is fighting in court to keep secret the subpoenas he issued last year as part of Democrats’ impeachment investigation into the president.

Jerry Dunleavy reported at The Washington Examiner (my former employer) that Schiff has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, who sought access to “the controversial subpoenas issued for phone records,” that led to the revealing of contact between Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) and journalist John Solomon, among others.

“[Schiff’s] legal team, led by Douglas Letter, the Democratic-led House’s general counsel, told the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday that ‘these requests and subpoenas were integral to the Committee’s inquiry and consistent with its mandate to investigate and issue a report’ about whether Trump should be impeached,” Dunleavy reported.

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit had argued: “The records are of critical public importance as the subpoenas were issued without any lawful basis and violated the rights of numerous private citizens.” It further stated that “disclosure of the requested records would serve the public interest by providing information about the unlawful issuance of the subpoenas” and that “the requested records fall within the scope of the public’s right of access to governmental records.”

Schiff’s motion argued that Judicial Watch “has not demonstrated that the public interest in disclosure outweighs the House Defendants’ interest in non-disclosure,” adding that “it is unclear for what precise purpose” the conservative watchdog group wanted the records, claiming it “does not allege whose rights have been violated.”

More from Dunleavy:

Schiff’s lawyers cited four reasons why the court should dismiss the case: They claimed that “the doctrine of sovereign immunity” deprives the court of jurisdiction over House Democrats, argued the records sought by Judicial Watch “are absolutely protected by the Speech or Debate Clause” of the Constitution because they were obtained during impeachment, asserted that the subpoena documents are not “public records” and thus aren’t subject to the common law right of public access, and said Judicial Watch “fails to state a claim because Congress has created a comprehensive scheme for the review of government records — the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — that preempts the common law right sought to be vindicated by this litigation.”

As The Daily Wire previously reported, during the course of Schiff’s partisan investigation into whether Trump abused his power when speaking to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and then obstructed congress, phone records were selectively released to implicate Nunes, Giuliani, and Solomon in Trump’s alleged misdeeds.

Part of the attempt was to tie Solomon to Lev Parnas, who was indicted for lying and falsifying records, though Solomon spoke to Parnas for a story months before the indictment and journalists often have to speak to bad people for a story.

When The Daily Wire originally wrote that article, Nunes provided a response to Schiff’s publishing of the California Republican’s phone records.

“The Democrats’ impeachment charade is flailing, and desperate people do desperate things,” Nunes said. “So, Schiff suddenly published phone records of myself, current and former Republican staff members, and a journalist whose reporting he doesn’t like. It’s a gross abuse of power for a congressman to go after his political opponents, staffers, and reporters in this way, but it’s characteristic of the way Schiff has run this entire show. He’s going to need a long rehabilitation period when this is over.”

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Christian Artist Lecrae Donates Hand Washing Stations for Atlanta Homeless

Atlanta (AP) — Grammy-winning hip hop recording artist Lecrae joined forces with non-profit organization Thursday to assemble and distribute portable hand-washing stations throughout Atlanta in areas with a high density of homeless people.

Lecrae Moore and volunteers with Love Beyond Walls assembled 15 wash stations, filled them with water and hand sanitizer and loaded them onto a truck for distribution.

Lecrae, winner of the Best Gospel Album Grammy award in 2013 for his album “Gravity,” rolled up his sleeves and went to work early, his mind set on helping the less fortunate.

“I wanted to continue doing the same stuff that I have been doing just in any city I’ve lived in and that’s just being close to the disenfranchised and the marginalized communities,” Lecrae said.

Terence Lester, founder of Love Beyond Walls, told the AP that disenfranchised people on the streets are in need as the new coronavirus spreads.

“You know, whether people like it or not, man we’re out here doing our part to ensure that people have access to this basic necessity during this pandemic,” Lester said.

For most people, the new coronavirus causes only mild or moderate symptoms, such as fever and cough.

For some, especially older adults and people with existing health problems, it can cause more severe illness, including pneumonia.

The vast majority of people recover from the new virus.

According to the World Health Organization, people with mild illness recover in about two weeks, while those with more severe illness may take three to six weeks to recover.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Lobby Insists Abortions Must Continue Unabated During Coronavirus Crisis

Several medical and advocacy groups have insisted abortion services should be considered as essential health care during the Chinese coronavirus pandemic and not subject to delays or a reduction of availability that will affect other health services.

Noting that some health systems “are implementing plans to cancel elective and non-urgent procedures to expand hospitals’ capacity to provide critical care” to victims of the crisis, a joint statement by several health organizations has urged that abortion providers should be exempt from such cutbacks.

A “Joint Statement on Abortion Access During the COVID-19 Outbreak” was issued Wednesday by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, together with the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, the American Gynecological & Obstetrical Society, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Society of Family Planning, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

“While most abortion care is delivered in outpatient settings, in some cases care may be delivered in hospital-based settings or surgical facilities. To the extent that hospital systems or ambulatory surgical facilities are categorizing procedures that can be delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic, abortion should not be categorized as such a procedure,” the statement declares.

“Abortion is an essential component of comprehensive health care,” the statement insists. “It is also a time-sensitive service for which a delay of several weeks, or in some cases days, may increase the risks or potentially make it completely inaccessible.”

The statement echoes a similar appeal by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), which “calls on leaders to ensure that outpatient abortion clinics can remain open and urges hospitals to continue to provide abortion care” even while other medical services are reduced or suspended.

According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association (ASCA), a surgery “may be deemed urgent and necessary if the treating physician decides that a months-long delay would increase the likelihood of significantly worse morbidity or prognosis for the patient.”

In Wednesday’s joint statement, the group of signatories declare that they “do not support COVID-19 responses that cancel or delay abortion procedures,” while adding that community-based and hospital-based clinicians “should consider collaboration to ensure abortion access is not compromised during this time.”

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Is The Panic Worse Than The Virus?

Is The Panic Worse Than The Virus?

Authored by MN Gordon via EconomicPrism.com,

The Great Panic of 2020 is already one for the history books.  Yet the damage has only just begun.  We suspect the stock market crash, economic destruction, and forfeiture of freedoms will persist long after the coronavirus hobgoblin has been put to bed.

With respect to the stock market, the modus operandi of the last 11 years is being stood on its head.  Rather than ‘buy the dip.’  The new divine mantra is ‘sell the rip.’  Here’s why…

If you recall, the U.S. stock market commenced a multi-year swan dive in autumn of 1929.  About that time, the economy also commenced a decade long Great Depression.  Given the rapid and relentless stock market carnage over the last month, and the prospect of a lengthy depression, a closer look is in order.

From September 3, 1929 to November 13, 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) lost 48.9 percent.  Then, as rarely noted, it rallied 48.1 percent through April 17, 1930.  This had the adverse effect of luring the buy the dip crowd back into the stock market just in time for the next massacre.

The 1929 through 1932 bear market, as noted by Pater Tenebrarum, was like a rubber ball bouncing down stairs.  With each bounce, even the most savvy of investors were given another chance to lose their money.  Taken in sequence, the repeated bounces provided many opportunities to lose money over and over again.

In the end, the bounce up between November 13, 1929 and April 30, 1930, turned out to be the ultimate sucker’s rally.  The DJIA subsequently crashed 89.2 percent from its initial peak, along with the hopes, dreams, and aspirations of an entire generation.

Such a colossal collapse could never, ever happen again, right?

Well, if it happened before, by definition, it could happen again.  Hence, if an interim bottom is put in over the next several weeks, and the DJIA attempts to retrace towards its February 12 all-time closing high, take this as a gift.  An opportunity to sell the rip.

Bend the Curve

The economy’s being fundamentally pummeled by coronavirus containment.  Long term damage will be sustained.  The type of damage that takes a decade – or more – to recover from.  Fake money won’t fix it.  But, nonetheless, there’s no shortage of solutions being offered to save us from ourselves.

Coronavirus, according to scientific prophecy, spreads exponentially.  The only way to contain it is to “flatten the curve” through “social distancing.”  The world must “hunker down” in unison; if not voluntarily, by government decree.

Bars, restaurants, gyms, schools, and many employers are shutting down.  San Francisco has ordered all residents to “shelter in place.”  The Maltese Falcon can only screech to itself from within a vacant John’s Grill.

The former Mayor of San Francisco, and now California Governor, Gavin Newsom, has ordered all residents to stay at home until further notice.  According to Newsom, “We need to bend the curve in the state of California.”

Perhaps these solutions have merit.  But they’re disastrous for the economy.  Cash flows are running dry.  Credit markets are freezing up.  People are losing their jobs.  Full mobilization is needed, we’re told, in the war on coronavirus.

For example, Fed Chairman Jay Powell’s pulling out all the monetary stops – zero interest rate policies, quantitative easing, repo madness – to pump liquidity into credit markets.  But that’s not all…

The Fed’s now accepting stocks as collateral in exchange for liquidity.  The Fed also established a Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF).  The sole intent of the MMLF is to keep short-term credit markets from frosting over like the Alaskan tundra, and breaking the buck.

On the fiscal side, the Treasury Department’s angling with Congress to send out $1,000 checks – possibly, two of them – to struggling Americans.  Mitt Romney, a man of discretion, is onboard with $1,000 checks.  Chuck Schumer says it won’t be enough.  Cory Booker wants to send out $4,500 checks.

But why stop there?  Why not send out $45,000 checks?  If a little helicopter money’s good, isn’t more always better?

Is the Panic Worse than the Virus?

If only the world was as simple as potato brains Booker believes.  Remember, when the U.S. Treasury borrows money created out of thin air from the Fed to send out checks, it’s executing a program of mass currency debasement.

A check may arrive in your mailbox.  But its face value constitutes a fraud.  Moreover, this fraud constitutes a down payment on tomorrow’s disorder.

Yet, by the doom being proffered on the matter, mass currency debasement and systematic hunkering is needed to win the war on coronavirus and save the economy.  Or is it?

For perspective, we’ll draw from words first scribbled in 1841 by Charles MacKay.  Here’s a brief excerpt from MacKay’s timeless classic, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds…

“During seasons of great pestilence men have often believed the prophecies of crazed fanatics, that the end of the world was come.  Credulity is always greatest in times of calamity.  Prophecies of all sorts are rife on such occasions, and are readily believed, whether for good or evil.

“During the great plague, which ravaged all Europe, between the years 1345 and 1350, it was generally considered that the end of the world was at hand.  Pretended prophets were to be found in all the principal cities of Germany, France, and Italy, predicting that within ten years the trump of the Archangel would sound, and the Saviour appear in the clouds to call the earth to judgment.”

As far as we can tell, the coronavirus has attracted prophets of all stripes like bees to a honey pot.  Mass coronavirus hysteria has led to public and pretend prophetic histrionics.

According to Bill Ackman, “hell is coming.”

Maybe so.  Or maybe the mass panic has been slightly overblown.  By this, is the panic worse than the virus?  Who knows?

What we do know, is the spring equinox has arrived…marking the earliest coming of spring in 124 years.  After the last several weeks of winter, we’ll take it.


Tyler Durden

Fri, 03/20/2020 – 10:50

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

Hospitals, leftists prioritize abortion over other surgeries in coronavirus epidemic

Thousands of restaurant and bar servers were abruptly unemployed Sunday night, March 15, 2020, and other business closed their doors immediately under orders from the Ohio Department of Health (ODH).  But there is one group of people who have job security and are still working instead of applying for unemployment.

“Our doors are open” is the message when calling abortion facilities (Planned Parenthood) in the Cleveland, Ohio area.  Those people all continue to work and get paid.  While hospitals have canceled non-essential surgeries, abortions apparently don’t fall under that category.  Planned Parenthood’s motto should be “Let no child stay alive.”

The National Abortion Federation (NAF) sent out the following:

As state and municipalities exact measures to slow the spread of COVID-19, more non-essential businesses will be instructed — or required — to close. At the same time, hospitals are preparing for a surge in COVID-19 cases and increased strain on their staff, resources, and systems, and will likely begin indefinite postponing non-essential or elective procedures.  During this public health crisis, pregnancy care, including abortion care, remains an essential health service.  The NAF calls on leaders to ensure that outpatient abortion clinics can remain open and urges hospitals to continue to provide abortion care.

While schools and churches have been shuttered and longed-for graduation ceremonies have been canceled, apparently it is okay to congregate at an abortion facility or use limited hospital resources.  Planned Parenthood phone messages comfort the caller by adding that the abortionists are working with the CDC and the ODH to ensure the safety of their patients and that the chance of catching the coronovirus remains low.  ”Leave a message to make an appointment.”

While Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House, tried to pad a bill infusing more money into abortions, a bill that was designed to help fight the Chinese Virus, as President Trump calls it, her efforts failed.

Massachusetts hospitals are forbidden from performing non-essential procedures, but the abortions continue.  A state agency memorandum opines: “Terminating a pregnancy is not considered a nonessential, elective invasive procedure for the purpose of guidance.  However, the ultimate decision is based on clinical judgment by the caring physician.”

President Mark Harrington of Created Equal, a pro-life organization, said: “Clearly, the abortion industry will not ‘allow this crisis to go to waste.'”

Hundreds of thousands of people across the country are now unemployed and worried about paying the rent or buying food, but the government keeps the abortion industry workers employed doing the essential work of the killing of babies. 

Susan Daniels has been an Ohio-licensed private investigator for twenty-seven years.  She uncovered Barack Obama’s phony social security number in 2009.

Thousands of restaurant and bar servers were abruptly unemployed Sunday night, March 15, 2020, and other business closed their doors immediately under orders from the Ohio Department of Health (ODH).  But there is one group of people who have job security and are still working instead of applying for unemployment.

“Our doors are open” is the message when calling abortion facilities (Planned Parenthood) in the Cleveland, Ohio area.  Those people all continue to work and get paid.  While hospitals have canceled non-essential surgeries, abortions apparently don’t fall under that category.  Planned Parenthood’s motto should be “Let no child stay alive.”

The National Abortion Federation (NAF) sent out the following:

As state and municipalities exact measures to slow the spread of COVID-19, more non-essential businesses will be instructed — or required — to close. At the same time, hospitals are preparing for a surge in COVID-19 cases and increased strain on their staff, resources, and systems, and will likely begin indefinite postponing non-essential or elective procedures.  During this public health crisis, pregnancy care, including abortion care, remains an essential health service.  The NAF calls on leaders to ensure that outpatient abortion clinics can remain open and urges hospitals to continue to provide abortion care.

While schools and churches have been shuttered and longed-for graduation ceremonies have been canceled, apparently it is okay to congregate at an abortion facility or use limited hospital resources.  Planned Parenthood phone messages comfort the caller by adding that the abortionists are working with the CDC and the ODH to ensure the safety of their patients and that the chance of catching the coronovirus remains low.  ”Leave a message to make an appointment.”

While Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House, tried to pad a bill infusing more money into abortions, a bill that was designed to help fight the Chinese Virus, as President Trump calls it, her efforts failed.

Massachusetts hospitals are forbidden from performing non-essential procedures, but the abortions continue.  A state agency memorandum opines: “Terminating a pregnancy is not considered a nonessential, elective invasive procedure for the purpose of guidance.  However, the ultimate decision is based on clinical judgment by the caring physician.”

President Mark Harrington of Created Equal, a pro-life organization, said: “Clearly, the abortion industry will not ‘allow this crisis to go to waste.'”

Hundreds of thousands of people across the country are now unemployed and worried about paying the rent or buying food, but the government keeps the abortion industry workers employed doing the essential work of the killing of babies. 

Susan Daniels has been an Ohio-licensed private investigator for twenty-seven years.  She uncovered Barack Obama’s phony social security number in 2009.

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Coronavirus Pandemic Highlights Importance of Economic Freedom

More
than ever, economic freedom matters.

The mysterious coronavirus, which originated from Wuhan, China, in December 2019, has engulfed countries across the globe. In dealing with an emerging pandemic such as this unpleasantly contagious one, principled approaches are essential, including keeping the crisis in context, pushing for full transparency, and ensuring international coordination and cooperation.

At the core of effectively fulfilling these fundamental tasks lies a system that preserves and enhances freedom.

As The Heritage Foundation’s just-released annual Index of Economic Freedom reminds us, policies and governing systems that promote freedom, whether through improvements in the rule of law, the promotion of competition and openness, or suitable restraints on the size and economic reach of government, turn out in practice to offer advance practical solutions to a wide range of challenges that constantly confront the world.  

The link between economic freedom and human wellbeing is undeniable. People in economically free societies live longer, have better health, and take better care of the environment.

They also tend to have greater capacity to counter infectious diseases that know no borders, such as the current coronavirus pandemic.

As shown in the following chart, nations with greater levels of economic freedom are clearly better positioned to ensure better outcomes given their superior overall capacity “to prevent, detect, and respond to significant disease outbreaks,” as defined by the Global Health Security (GHS) Index.

The
Global Health Security Index is a comprehensive assessment of health security
and related capabilities jointly published by the Johns Hopkins Center for
Health Security, the Nuclear Threat Initiative, and The Economist Intelligence
Unit.

As
its report emphasizes, a resilient
country not only must “prioritize and exercise the capabilities required to
prevent, detect, and rapidly respond to public health emergencies,” but also “be
transparent about its capabilities to assure neighbors it can stop an outbreak
from becoming an international catastrophe.” 

Fundamentally,
nations’ capacity to handle pandemics hinges on the quality of their
institutions and economic systems, particularly given the positive linkage between
economic freedom and health security capacities that’s shown in the chart
above.

In a quite similar context, Josh Rogin of The Washington Post pointed out in his recent commentary:

Some commentators are arguing that China’s coronavirus response attests to the superiority of its authoritarian brand of governance and crisis management. In reality, it turns out that democracies are better suited to protect public health–at least, when they take advantage of their inherent strengths. One country is showing how it’s done: South Korea…. Democracies strike a balance between personal liberty and government responsibility. Our citizens live better lives because they are promised dignity and entrusted with truth. Our values are not what make us vulnerable; they are what make us strong.

Indeed, countries with higher degrees of freedom are more resilient in times of calamity because they capitalize more fully on the capacity of their free-market democracies to reinforce human ingenuity and empowerment.

Perhaps most remarkably, they constantly push forward the frontiers of human achievement in science, medical breakthroughs, and technology through greater innovation facilitated by free enterprise.

In a period of growing uncertainty and anxiety, the world is witnessing how countries across the economic freedom spectrum respond to the coronavirus pandemic. As this critical effort continues, preserving policies that advance economic freedom should be an integral dimension of combating the infectious disease.

Now is the time to take decisive yet targeted prudent policy actions to minimize human cost and mitigate the economic effects associated with the coronavirus.  

As The Heritage Foundation’s guiding document “True North: The Principles of Conservatism” reminds us, “America is strongest when our policies protect our national interests, preserve our alliances of free peoples, vigorously counter threats to our security, and advance prosperity through economic freedom at home and abroad.”

The post Coronavirus Pandemic Highlights Importance of Economic Freedom appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Democrat Sen. Feinstein Also Sold Stocks After Closed Door Meeting on Coronavirus

You knew this was going to happen.
Last night news broke that Republican senators Richard Burr, Kelly Loefner, Ron Johnson and Jim Inhofe sold significant stock shares following a January 24th meeting on the coronavirus threat.

Well, as predicted, it wasn’t just Republicans.
Senator Dianne Feinstein of California also sold stocks after the meeting.

The media is being very silent on Senator Feinstein for some reason.

So will Senator Feinstein step down and be prosecuted?

The post Democrat Sen. Feinstein Also Sold Stocks After Closed Door Meeting on Coronavirus appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Political tectonic plates are shifting as media and other Dems start praising Trump’s crisis management (and as his polls rise)

Political tectonic plates are shifting as progs like Ilhan Omar start praising Trump’s crisis management (and as his polls rise)

At first, the growing wave of praise for President Trump’s handling of the Coronavirus catastrophe seemed like pigs flying, an unexpected and rare event. But now that the governors of deep blue California and New York have been joined by Ilhan Omar in admiring his handling of the crisis, we can see that forces far larger than individuals going rogue from Trump Derangement Syndrome are at work. TDS  is being swamped by the reality of an existential crisis.

 

 

The latest Harris polls show rising approval for the federal government’s handling of the crisis:

Conducted using a nationally representative sample of 2,050 Americans over two waves, March 14-15 and March 17-18, the poll provided some quick feedback on how the public’s perception can change overnight even as the government shifts its response to a crisis in which the news seemingly changes by the hour.

Overall, both waves showed around 60% of Americans “satisfied” with how the federal government has handled the coronavirus crisis so far.

Of the president’s performance, 56% of the second wave approve of the way Trump has handled the COVID-19 crisis, with 44% disapproving. This is up five percentage points from the first wave, conducted only two days before. Meanwhile, Trump’s overall approval jumped four percentage points between waves, from 49% to 53%.

Democrat politicians have access to far more granular polling data that must show them that Americans want a strong leader in a time of mortal peril facing them, and that President Trump is rising to the challenge of his office. The smarter ones among them may also understand that the nonstop carping, criticizing every move that Trump has made since taking office, has created cynicism and doubt about the sincerity of the continuous nit-picking. President Trump is not about to let them forget the wave of criticism denouncing his prescient ban on arrivals from China as racist, either, so they had better get on board and earn his favor, lest they be called out.

REPORTER: “You did say a few days ago that you did have a sense that this was a pandemic that was coming. So why was the United States not prepared with more testing — “

TRUMP: “We were very prepared. The only thing we weren’t prepared for was the media. The media has not treated it fairly. I will tell you how prepared I was, I called for a ban from people coming in from China long before anybody thought it was — in fact, it was your network, I believe they called me a racist because I did that. It was many of the people in the room, they called me racist and other words because I did that, because I went so early. So when you say we weren’t prepared, had I let these tens of thousands of people come in from China a day, we would have had something right now that would have been — you wouldn’t have even recognized it compared to where we are. How many people have passed away? How many people have died as of this moment? You could multiply that by a factor of many, many, many. So when you say that I wasn’t prepared, I was the first one to do the ban. Now other countries are following what I did. But the media doesn’t acknowledge that. They know it’s true. They know it’s true, but they don’t want to write about it. Yeah, go ahead.”

The plain fact is that Americans rally behind their presidents when the nation is under attack, whether by a nation state or a virus. In recent adult memory, President George W. Bush reaped such support. Those who appear to be hobbling the effectiveness is the response to such as a personal and lethal threat earn contempt from the majority, who want to pull together to overcome the threat that faces us as a people. Nothing unifies more powerfully than an external threat to the collectivity. When Ilhan Omar understands this,  we can be sure that the message is sinking in to all but the thoroughly dysfunctional deranged (who are still numerous on the left, to be sure).

 It helps a lot that President Trump’s management style is well-adapted to crisis management in the face of an unprecedented threat full of unknowable factors. He is the very opposite of the traditional bureaucratic approach of appointing a task force and waiting for a report on the best way to handle matters. His style is to identify the best people (in his eyes) and give them room to move quickly, and monitor the results closely, making changes as the situation warrants.

The top-down bureaucratic approach minimizes visible mistakes, at least when the situation is well understood, but at the cost of delay. And bureaucrats loathe being held responsible for mistakes, so they instinctively go for a strategy that minimizes personal liabilities.

Trump, whose history includes a lot of scrambling to make, and then save, complex real estate deals, is comfortable with a looser, ad hoc approach, always trying to minimize the downside, but unafraid to take calculated risks and rapidly act when events go south. And in his daily briefings with his team, he is unafraid to act and justify his actions on the basis of the best information available at the time, and then revise those decisions (such as his characterization of the seriousness of the threat) as data warrants.

To my eyes, he also seems to be getting his metaphorical sea legs as a presidential crisis leader, backing his team strongly (and receiving visible and effusive support back from them) while bringing along the public with them as they scramble to figure out together what is in the best interests of the nation.

Seven and a half months, the amount of time until the nation votes, is an eternity in politics, and a lot can happen. But right now, President Trump is solidifying his role as our leader, who is doing his best to save his allies and his foes alike from a threat that could kill any or all of us.

Photo credit: Grabien screen grab

Political tectonic plates are shifting as progs like Ilhan Omar start praising Trump’s crisis management (and as his polls rise)

At first, the growing wave of praise for President Trump’s handling of the Coronavirus catastrophe seemed like pigs flying, an unexpected and rare event. But now that the governors of deep blue California and New York have been joined by Ilhan Omar in admiring his handling of the crisis, we can see that forces far larger than individuals going rogue from Trump Derangement Syndrome are at work. TDS  is being swamped by the reality of an existential crisis.

 

 

The latest Harris polls show rising approval for the federal government’s handling of the crisis:

Conducted using a nationally representative sample of 2,050 Americans over two waves, March 14-15 and March 17-18, the poll provided some quick feedback on how the public’s perception can change overnight even as the government shifts its response to a crisis in which the news seemingly changes by the hour.

Overall, both waves showed around 60% of Americans “satisfied” with how the federal government has handled the coronavirus crisis so far.

Of the president’s performance, 56% of the second wave approve of the way Trump has handled the COVID-19 crisis, with 44% disapproving. This is up five percentage points from the first wave, conducted only two days before. Meanwhile, Trump’s overall approval jumped four percentage points between waves, from 49% to 53%.

Democrat politicians have access to far more granular polling data that must show them that Americans want a strong leader in a time of mortal peril facing them, and that President Trump is rising to the challenge of his office. The smarter ones among them may also understand that the nonstop carping, criticizing every move that Trump has made since taking office, has created cynicism and doubt about the sincerity of the continuous nit-picking. President Trump is not about to let them forget the wave of criticism denouncing his prescient ban on arrivals from China as racist, either, so they had better get on board and earn his favor, lest they be called out.

REPORTER: “You did say a few days ago that you did have a sense that this was a pandemic that was coming. So why was the United States not prepared with more testing — “

TRUMP: “We were very prepared. The only thing we weren’t prepared for was the media. The media has not treated it fairly. I will tell you how prepared I was, I called for a ban from people coming in from China long before anybody thought it was — in fact, it was your network, I believe they called me a racist because I did that. It was many of the people in the room, they called me racist and other words because I did that, because I went so early. So when you say we weren’t prepared, had I let these tens of thousands of people come in from China a day, we would have had something right now that would have been — you wouldn’t have even recognized it compared to where we are. How many people have passed away? How many people have died as of this moment? You could multiply that by a factor of many, many, many. So when you say that I wasn’t prepared, I was the first one to do the ban. Now other countries are following what I did. But the media doesn’t acknowledge that. They know it’s true. They know it’s true, but they don’t want to write about it. Yeah, go ahead.”

The plain fact is that Americans rally behind their presidents when the nation is under attack, whether by a nation state or a virus. In recent adult memory, President George W. Bush reaped such support. Those who appear to be hobbling the effectiveness is the response to such as a personal and lethal threat earn contempt from the majority, who want to pull together to overcome the threat that faces us as a people. Nothing unifies more powerfully than an external threat to the collectivity. When Ilhan Omar understands this,  we can be sure that the message is sinking in to all but the thoroughly dysfunctional deranged (who are still numerous on the left, to be sure).

 It helps a lot that President Trump’s management style is well-adapted to crisis management in the face of an unprecedented threat full of unknowable factors. He is the very opposite of the traditional bureaucratic approach of appointing a task force and waiting for a report on the best way to handle matters. His style is to identify the best people (in his eyes) and give them room to move quickly, and monitor the results closely, making changes as the situation warrants.

The top-down bureaucratic approach minimizes visible mistakes, at least when the situation is well understood, but at the cost of delay. And bureaucrats loathe being held responsible for mistakes, so they instinctively go for a strategy that minimizes personal liabilities.

Trump, whose history includes a lot of scrambling to make, and then save, complex real estate deals, is comfortable with a looser, ad hoc approach, always trying to minimize the downside, but unafraid to take calculated risks and rapidly act when events go south. And in his daily briefings with his team, he is unafraid to act and justify his actions on the basis of the best information available at the time, and then revise those decisions (such as his characterization of the seriousness of the threat) as data warrants.

To my eyes, he also seems to be getting his metaphorical sea legs as a presidential crisis leader, backing his team strongly (and receiving visible and effusive support back from them) while bringing along the public with them as they scramble to figure out together what is in the best interests of the nation.

Seven and a half months, the amount of time until the nation votes, is an eternity in politics, and a lot can happen. But right now, President Trump is solidifying his role as our leader, who is doing his best to save his allies and his foes alike from a threat that could kill any or all of us.

Photo credit: Grabien screen grab

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

HUGE DEVELOPMENT! … Now 3 International Studies Find Chloroquine with Azithromycin Shows 100% Success Rate in Treating Coronavirus in 6 Days! (VIDEO)

HUGE BREAKING NEWS—

There are now THREE international studies — China, Australia and France — that found that Chloroquine with Azithromycin Shows 100% Success Rate in Treating Coronavirus in 6 Days!

We have reported on the success of Chloroquine earlier today and this week.

President Trump announced on Thursday morning that the CDC had approved use of the drug in treating coronavirus patients.

But tonight we heard more from Rep. Mark Green, a former Army Flight Surgeon, that the combination of Chloroquine with  Azithromycin cleared the virus in 3 days in 100% of the patients in the study.

That is THREE international studies now that show the success of the Chloroquine treatment.

Rep. Mark Green (R-TN) :  The old reliable Malaria drug chloroquine, the newer version hydroxychloroquine has shown really good, three studies, one in Australia, one in China and now one in France mixed with azithromycin, just the old Z-Pac that we take for bronchitis, has had 100%.  It cleared the virus, in some cases in three days,  that cocktail in every one of the patients in that study…  It’s very promising, 100% of the virus gone in six days!

Via FOX News @ Night:

The post HUGE DEVELOPMENT! … Now 3 International Studies Find Chloroquine with Azithromycin Shows 100% Success Rate in Treating Coronavirus in 6 Days! (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com