Google Will No Longer Provide Software Tools To Oil/Gas Companies To Combat Climate Change…

LOLOLOLOL

Via CNBC:

Google has pledged to stop building customized artificial intelligence (AI) tools that help oil and gas firms to extract fossil fuels worldwide.

The pledge came after a Greenpeace report on Tuesday highlighted how Google, Microsoft, and Amazon use AI and warehouse servers to help the likes of Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil to locate and retrieve oil and gas deposits from the earth.

A Google spokesperson confirmed to CNBC that the company “will not … build custom AI/ML algorithms to facilitate upstream extraction in the oil and gas industry.”

Google Cloud took approximately $65 million from oil and gas companies in 2019, the spokesperson said, adding that it accounts for less than 1% of total Google Cloud revenues. Given Google Cloud’s relatively small slice of the oil and gas market, it wasn’t a huge stretch for the company to vow not to compete on AI/ML.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Europe’s Coronavirus Numbers Are Still ‘In Check’ Weeks After Lockdowns Lifted

Europe’s coronavirus infections are still “in check” authorites say, weeks after European governments began lifting coronavirus-related lockdowns, defying some experts’ expectations about the continued spread of the novel coronavirus.

Bloomberg reports that European officials are “closely monitoring coronavirus data” for signs of a second wave of infections, but so far, countries like Germany, France, and Italy are still seeing decreases in the number of COVID-19 infections and COVID-19 deaths.

That’s good news for many U.S. residents and American virus experts who feared a second “peak” in coronavirus infections after states like Georgia, Florida, and Texas loosened lockdown restrictions and stay-at-home orders. So far, those three states have seen either a steady number of infections or a slight downward trend in positive coronavirus tests, indicating that “reopening” may not be as dangerous as many believed — at least, with the right restrictions and continued anti-viral measures in place.

According to Bloomberg, France, which once had more than 15,000 cases of coronavirus at its peak, now sees fewer than 100, weeks after lockdowns began to lift in early May.

Italy began lifting its lockdowns on May 4th, after cases of COVID-19 appeared to be on a downward trend from that country’s peak on April 15th. So far, the number of cases have remained on a downard trajectory, and Italy saw its first sub-500 case day on Tuesday, May 19th. Italy is now almost fully reopened; on Monday, “with distancing rules,” “shops, bars, and restaurants were allowed to reopen,” per Bloomberg.

In Spain, cases have been steady at a few dozen, and that trend has continued since the country opened on May 10th.

Now, European officials have shifted their focus to Sweden, where cases remain on the rise, but where the government took few measures to lock down public areas, choosing instead to allow Swedish citizens to follow social distancing guidelines and take personal protective measures, in pursuit of herd immunity to the virus.

Sweden has suffered markedly from that decision, but not as markedly as others. “Sweden still has fewer deaths per capita than the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Belgium and France, which have all opted for lockdowns, but much higher than Nordic neighbours Denmark, Norway and Finland,” US News and World Report says.

Economically, they’re better off than their European neighbors: “Sweden’s open strategy seems to have softened the blow on the economy, with growth shrinking much less than in Denmark and Norway in the first quarter.”

The United States did reach a milestone Wednesday, with all 50 states now releasing some of their lockdown restrictions, with Connecticut being the final state to lift its stay-at-home order, partially, at midnight on May 20th. Some states are still struggling with high infection numbers, but most now believe infections are on a downard trend and that hospital beds and ventilators will be available for those who continued to be affected by novel coronavirus.

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Soros Announces ‘Revolutionary Moment’ Is Here, Can Accomplish the ‘Inconceivable’

On its face, an interview of George Soros by the people at Project Syndicate seems a curious set of affairs.

Project Syndicate, which describes itself as “The World’s Opinion Page,” occasionally has some good material even though you’re never going to see, say, Ben Shapiro or Douglas Murray contributing a piece.

That’s not quite the reason the interview was so curious, however.

Instead, there was the fact that Soros’ Open Society Institute played a critical role in establishing Project Syndicate in the immediate post-Soviet era in Europe.

It’s a bit like Oprah Magazine publishing an interview with its eponymous founder, only if that Oprah Winfrey was known as one of the most identifiable supporters and bankrollers of globalist progressivism and open borders immigration policies.

TRENDING: WH Adviser Responds to Obama’s Dig Against Trump, Labels Barack’s Presidency a ‘Kumbaya of Incompetence’

The occasion had to do with the novel coronavirus and how it’s reshaped the world.

As you can imagine, it was a wildly uncritical interview — which I didn’t mind. I know, you’d prefer Soros to be held to account, too, but sometimes people are more likely to say ugly things when they assume they’re among friends as opposed to being in an adversarial conversation.

On this count, at least, the May 11 interview delivered, particularly with tone-deaf answers like this:

“This is the crisis of my lifetime,” Soros said. “Even before the pandemic hit, I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible, but probably absolutely necessary.

Is George Soros trying to change the global economic system via COVID-19?

100% (14 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“And then came COVID-19, which has totally disrupted people’s lives and required very different behavior. It is an unprecedented event that probably has never occurred in this combination. And it really endangers the survival of our civilization.”

I don’t want to make too much of the order there, but there’s a whiff of a Freudian slip there. Notice the order there. Crisis of his lifetime, revolutionary moment, inconceivable before, required different behavior, unprecedented — oh and yeah, it could potentially endanger the survival of civilization as we know it. We’ll get back to this in a second, but let’s just be clear what the rest of the interview involved.

There’s a lot of boilerplate stuff here from Soros. Take this bit, which could have come from any random glazed-eyed person watching CNN’s COVID-19 coverage 11 hours a day: “We are learning very fast, and we now know a lot more about the virus than we did when it emerged, but we are shooting at a moving target because the virus itself changes rapidly.”

There’s actually some good stuff, too. Even though he favors working with China on beating the virus, he doesn’t particularly feel it’s something we should be doing in the long run: “That makes everything much harder. There are a lot of people who say that we should be working very closely with China, but I am not in favor of doing that. We must protect our democratic open society.”

He also said, “I sympathize with the Chinese people, because they are under the domination of a dictator, President Xi Jinping. I think a lot of educated Chinese are very resentful of that, and the general public is still very angry with him for keeping COVID-19 a secret until after the Chinese New Year.”

RELATED: Hundreds of Criminals Could Soon Be Free in California Thanks to Soros-Backed Org

And then there’s the expected Trump-bashing: “Donald Trump would like to be a dictator. But he cannot be one because there is a constitution in the United States that people still respect. And it will prevent him from doing certain things. That does not mean that he will not try, because he is literally fighting for his life. I will also say that I have put my faith in Trump to destroy himself, and he has exceeded my wildest expectations.”

I’d advise you to look at the politicians that Soros has backed and then call for summary judgment.

It’s that first quote that’s likely to draw the most attention, however.

Apparently, we’re in a revolutionary moment. This is curious, given Soros’ definition of “revolution,” because far-left movements throughout the globe haven’t been doing swimmingly as of late. While New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of “the squad” gets a whole lot of oxygen in the media’s current landscape, let’s be clear about what they are: four women from bright-red districts who managed to win with bright-red rhetoric. There’s a news flash for you.

Oh, and I betcha didn’t know that plenty of far-lefties managed to elect Jeremy Corbyn head of Labour in the U.K. What happened after that? Err … probably best not to ask.

But now comes the pandemic, and things can take a turn. There’s very different behavior, after all, and many of the causes Soros has been bankrolling for decades now — open borders, globalization, increased scope of government on an exponential scale — can become a reality.

By the way, this “don’t let a good crisis go to waste” rhetoric might have been the most disturbing thing in the interview, but surprisingly not by much.

About half of the interview had to deal with the European Union — the eternal bee in Mr. Soros’ bonnet — and, among other things, how it should finance the massive debt it’s incurring because of coronavirus. Soros’ suggestion was perpetual bonds, a financial instrument many won’t be familiar with. Here’s a quick explainer: It’s a bond that cannot be redeemed but pays interest in perpetuity.

“The kind of bonds that I have proposed … would be issued by the EU as a whole, would automatically be proportional, and would remain so eternally,” Soros said. “The member states would have to pay only the annual interest, which is so minimal — at, say, 0.5% — that the bonds could be easily subscribed by the member states, either unanimously or by a coalition of the willing.”

Soros mentioned that these bonds were used in times of yore to cover significant costs — one of the most recent examples being the British Treasury’s financing of World War I.

I bring this up not just because these financial instruments are antediluvian in the modern era but because of what they’d be paying for — namely, Soros’ “revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible, but probably absolutely necessary.”

This is a purposely vague comment, but we can guess at some of the things this would involve, and most of it wouldn’t just be triage from the economic carnage caused by the coronavirus. Is this what countries should be paying interest in perpetuity for?

Soros is a man who’s always been on the lookout for the instrument with which he could reshape not just our political systems but the very nature of capitalism and freedom itself.

One wished the interviewer here had asked some probing follow-ups, but this is what you get when the interviewer has been, in part, bankrolled by the interviewed.

As it stands, we have enough here to make us all very worried.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

CDC Revises Guidance, Says Coronavirus ‘Does Not Spread Easily’ Over Contaminated Surfaces

As we continue through the fifth month of the coronavirus pandemic in the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has updated its guidance on how COVID-19 spreads, saying it “does not spread easily” over contaminated surfaces.

The Blaze reported that the CDC guidance has changed in a “subtle” way, but it is still of interest. “The disease has always been thought to spread mainly through person-to-person contact by respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks. But up until recently, the CDC maintained that the virus could also spread through contact with contaminated surfaces,” the outlet reported.

The guidance now says “the virus spreads easily between people” but “does not spread easily in other ways.” The guidance also says: “It may be possible for COVID-19 to spread in other ways, but these are not thought to be the main ways the virus spreads.”

This is a slight difference from previous guidance, which Yahoo News reported as saying the virus spreading in other ways “may be possible” without the disclaimer noting it is not the main way for the virus to spread.

More from The Blaze:

Much of the thinking on the virus’ spread through contaminated surfaces stemmed from a New England Journal of Medicine study in March that found the virus could survive in the air for hours and on certain surfaces for days. In the study, the virus was detected up to four hours later on copper, up to one day later on cardboard, and up to three days later on plastic and stainless steel.

Though the study never purported to say that people who touched those surfaces could become infected, guidance on the matter advised caution.

In April, when the Food and Drug Administration announced that customers don’t need to worry about contracting the virus from grocery packaging, CDC guidance expressed caution, citing the study.

Yahoo reported that the change wasn’t based on any new study, but epidemiological data.

“Based on the epidemiology, we know that the main way this virus is infecting people is from direct contact with other infected people,” Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told the outlet. “Contaminated surfaces play some role, but it’s likely much smaller.”

“This is a respiratory virus, and respiratory viruses largely spread through breathing in infected respiratory droplets,” Dr. Adalja added.

As with any information about the coronavirus, this shouldn’t be taken to mean people shouldn’t take caution when touching surfaces. The virus may still be present and they can still contract it, so take necessary precautions and use common sense.

“It might be possible to become infected after touching a surface that has the virus, then touching one’s face,” Dr. Richard Watkins, an infections disease physician at Northeast Ohio Medical University, told Yahoo. “That is why handwashing and avoiding touching one’s face are important. However, this isn’t the main way the virus is spread.”

The Daily Wire, headed by bestselling author and popular podcast host Ben Shapiro, is a leading provider of conservative news, cutting through the mainstream media’s rhetoric to provide readers the most important, relevant, and engaging stories of the day. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Trump Issues Major Threat to Michigan Over Mail-In Voting Plan

News

Trump Issues Major Threat to Michigan Over Mail-In Voting Plan

President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with his Cabinet in the East Room of the White House on May 19, 2020, in Washington, D.C.Alex Wong / Getty ImagesPresident Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with his Cabinet in the East Room of the White House on May 19, 2020, in Washington, D.C. (Alex Wong / Getty Images)

President Donald Trump on Wednesday lashed out at two states seeking to embrace mail-in voting.

“Breaking: Michigan sends absentee ballots to 7.7 million people ahead of Primaries and the General Election. This was done illegally and without authorization by a rogue Secretary of State. I will ask to hold up funding to Michigan if they want to go down this Voter Fraud path!” Trump tweeted.

The president tagged Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russ Vought, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and the Treasury Department in a subsequent tweet.

TRENDING: WH Adviser Responds to Obama’s Dig Against Trump, Labels Barack’s Presidency a ‘Kumbaya of Incompetence’

Trump then added another state to his list of targets.

“State of Nevada ‘thinks’ that they can send out illegal vote by mail ballots, creating a great Voter Fraud scenario for the State and the U.S. They can’t! If they do, “I think” I can hold up funds to the State. Sorry, but you must not cheat in elections,” Trump tweeted later.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson fired back at Trump’s tweet.

“I also have a name, it’s Jocelyn Benson. And we sent applications, not ballots. Just like my GOP colleagues in Iowa, Georgia, Nebraska and West Virginia,” she tweeted.

All 7.7 million of Michigan’s registered voters will receive absentee ballot applications before the state’s Aug. 4 primary and the Nov. 3 general election, Benson said Tuesday, according to Reuters.

Michigan is led by Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, who has been touted as a potential vice presidential pick by presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.

RELATED: First Four Facts You Need To Know About Kamala Harris

Should Democratic vote-by-mail plans be stopped to prevent fraud?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“By mailing applications, we have ensured that no Michigander has to choose between their health and their right to vote,” Benson said in a statement. “Voting by mail is easy, convenient, safe, and secure, and every voter in Michigan has the right to do it.”

Nevada is already embroiled in a dispute over its vote-by-mail plan for the state’s June 9 primary elections, according to Fox News.

The Clark County Election Department sent absentee ballots to inactive voters, which includes people who have moved or died. Clark County encompasses Las Vegas.

“What’s going to happen with these things, they’re not secured at all and there are thousands of them just sitting here,” Jenny Trobiani, a postal worker in Clark County, told Fox.

“This just seems fraudulent to me, something stinks here,” she said.

Republicans have said the Clark County elections commission is playing partisan politics with its actions.

“The Democratic county commissioners were working with the Democratic Party on some kind of backroom deal,” Rick Gorka, the deputy communications director for the Republican National Committee, told Fox.

“If Trump was accused of doing this, there would be an outrage.”

“Anyone can turn in a ballot they pick off the ground,” added Keith Schipper, the Nevada Trump Victory communications director. “This is a dangerous proposition.”

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Donald Trump Threatens to Punish Michigan for Mailing Absentee Ballot Applications to Voters

President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to punish Michigan for mailing absentee ballot applications to all state voters ahead of the election.

“This was done illegally and without authorization by a rogue Secretary of State,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “I will ask to hold up funding to Michigan if they want to go down this Voter Fraud path!”

On Tuesday, Michigan’s Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson sent ballot applications to 7.7 million voters in the state.

“By mailing applications, we have ensured that no Michigander has to choose between their health and their right to vote,” Benson said in a statement. “Voting by mail is easy, convenient, safe, and secure, and every voter in Michigan has the right to do it.”

The plan will cost $4.5 million, which the secretary of state said would come from the CARES Act. The act passed by Congress provides funding for Election Security grants.

Recent data has not shown a compelling public health justification for vote-by-mail.

Wisconsin is one of the only U.S. states that held its primary election with in-person voting after the coronavirus lockdown began. Only a few dozen people at maximum were confirmed to have contracted the virus after participating either as voters or poll workers, and none of those cases were fatal.

Out of the 413,000 participants, that equals an infection rate below two-hundredths of one percent. Just days later, South Korea held national elections which did not result in any new coronavirus cases.

 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Obama’s De Facto Russian Collusion Co-Conspirators

The release of both the sworn testimony of those involved in creating and disseminating the Russia collusion hoax and the documentation outlining how General Flynn was framed has confirmed that President Obama was fully involved in and aware of the treasonous effort to use the power of government to undermine the Trump campaign, marginalize the Trump presidency, and destroy General Flynn. 

The most astounding aspect of this entire sorry spectacle is that in a nation with a 244-year history of constitutional republicanism and a free press, a President and his confederates felt so emboldened that they orchestrated what amounts to an attempted coup in what is undoubtedly the greatest political scandal in American history.

So certain were the Obama collaborators they would not only succeed in emasculating President Trump, but they would never be held accountable that one of the prime collaborators, James Clapper, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, unabashedly revealed to Anderson Cooper of CNN in July of 2018 the following (which was completely ignored and buried by the mainstream media):  

If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, including Special Counsel (Robert) Mueller’s investigation.  President Obama is responsible for that.  It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place.

Reading between the lines, Obama not only ordered the review but would have been fully aware of the use of the Steele Dossier.  A totally fabricated document which was the pretext and sole basis of the intelligence assessment, FISA applications and the justification for the Mueller investigation.

President Obama, as he has done throughout his political career, tacitly encouraged his aides and minions to leak to their accomplices in the media any negative, and oftentimes fabricated, whispers about his political rivals.   The Obama Administration holdovers in the new Trump Administration, having been steeped in this duplicity, would also be part of the grand strategy of marginalizing President Trump utilizing an incessant drumbeat of fabricated leaks about Russia, collusion, and Trump’s supposed ineptitude in order to frame public opinion and intimidate the Republicans in Congress. 

During the entirety of the Obama presidency, the Republicans and the mainstream media never held him to account for any scandals that presaged the Russia collusion imbroglio. These include the Fast and Furious cover-up, the use of government agencies to spy on various reporters and news outlets, illegally hacking into the computers in the Senate in order to snoop on and intimidate various senators, and the IRS targeting of conservative organizations in order to undermine their voice in elections.

 

Obama Administration Cabinet, July 2012

Official White House photo by Chuck Kennedy

The egregious, overt and illegal attempt to obliterate Donald Trump and subvert the Constitution was conceived and put into motion by President Obama and his fellow perpetrators because they felt certain that a feckless Republican Party would never fully probe Obama’s motives or actions.   Additionally, Obama was confident a sycophantic mainstream media would never seriously investigate a conspiracy initiated by him, whom they idolized, and they would, in fact, abet the plot to destroy Donald Trump, whom they loathed.

Since 1989 and the election of George H.W. Bush, a majority of Republicans elected to national office have chosen to worship the twin gods of civility and compromise rather than vigorously defend and promote liberty, free enterprise and limited government.  Meanwhile, their political adversaries, the Democratic Party and the Left (now one and the same) had no such compunctions, as they were determined to achieve their ends regardless of the means.  

In conjunction with their accomplices in the mainstream media, Democrats quickly ascertained that any outrageous accusation on their part, such as that Republicans are determined to starve children, would eventuate in the near complete surrender of any opposition to their proposed policies.  Further, rather than support their colleagues in the Party who were oftentimes the victims of specious and malicious accusations, the spineless elites in the Republican Party willingly sacrificed their members on the altar of civility and faux integrity.

On the other hand, in an effort to show a willingness to “compromise” when in control of either or both Houses of Congress, the Republicans inevitably slow-walked or initiated cursory investigations of any Democrat wrongdoing. 

The recently released sworn testimony of Obama’s collaborators, wherein to a person they admit there was no Russian collusion, took place when the Republicans controlled the House of Representatives.  Yet, with this testimony in-hand, Speaker Paul Ryan and Chairman Trey Gowdy publicly proclaimed the FBI and various intelligence agencies did nothing wrong and refused any request by other Republicans on the investigative committees to issue subpoenas to further expose the conspiracy.    Both men also remained steadfast in their support of Robert Mueller and his probe despite the sworn testimony of the Obama co-conspirators. 

In the Republican controlled Senate, the Intelligence Committee under the Chairmanship of Richard Burr essentially exonerated the intelligence community of any wrongdoing by solely focusing on the question of whether Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election in order to assist the Trump campaign and ignoring mountains of evidence that the various intelligence agencies were determined to spy on and undermine the Trump campaign. 

The failure to pursue a thorough and complete investigation to publicly expose the truth allowed the Mueller probe to extend beyond Election Day 2018, costing the Republicans the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi being installed as Speaker, the Ukraine impeachment fiasco, and never-ending investigations of President Trump and his Administration. 

Because of Republican fecklessness nearly 53% of all Americans and 77% of Democrats as of April 2020 still believe the Steele Dossier proved that there was collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign.  Barack Obama and his henchmen’s faith in the spinelessness of the Republicans in Congress was well placed.  

Complicit in skullduggery were the adoring minions in the mainstream media.  Not only were they in the thrall of Obama, but as Donald Trump repeatedly singled them out for their bias and penchant for misreporting during the campaign, they were determined to flex their influence and join in the Obama attempt to destroy him as they breathlessly waited for any leak from their “trusted” sources.   Any story or leak no matter how salacious or false or unproven was banner headlines and fodder for endless cable news coverage.

The obviously inane accusation that Donald Trump was a traitor and beholden to Vladimir Putin was quickly seized upon without any question or justification.

In a little over three years, the Washington Post published nearly 24,000 stories about Trump, Russia and collusion.  The New York Times published over 18,000 stories.  CNN on its website published 11,500 stories.   The wire service Associated Press, which supplies over 1300 local newspapers and broadcasters with news articles, published nearly 12,500 stories.  All told there were probably more than 100,000 stories published in the media, over 90% of which were anti-Trump with virtually no criticism or disclosure of the Obama Administration and their machinations.

Among CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, PBS and NBC, it is estimated that over 20,000 broadcast hours were spent on the Russian collusion narrative again virtually all anti-Trump as many of the Obama collaborators were retained as contributors on these networks.  Barack Obama’s faith in the cooperation of the mainstream media was also well placed.

Standing athwart this onslaught was President Trump, his Twitter account, impartial investigative bloggers, conservative leaning websites, talk radio, a handful of tenacious Republican members of the House and the opinion hosts on Fox News.   

Without Donald Trump’s resolve and tenacity, along with the determination of his small cadre of stalwart allies, the Obama coup attempt might well have succeeded in so marginalizing the Trump presidency that he would have been abandoned by the Republicans in Congress and, in all likelihood, been forced to resign.  No other Republican president since Abraham Lincoln, with the possible exception of Ronald Reagan, would have been able to survive and turn the tables on his tormentors.

Nonetheless, Barack Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their machinations to undermine an election and then overthrow a presidency if it were not for the fecklessness of the Republican Party and the blind eye as well as the overt support of the mainstream media.  His de facto co-conspirators. 

The release of both the sworn testimony of those involved in creating and disseminating the Russia collusion hoax and the documentation outlining how General Flynn was framed has confirmed that President Obama was fully involved in and aware of the treasonous effort to use the power of government to undermine the Trump campaign, marginalize the Trump presidency, and destroy General Flynn. 

The most astounding aspect of this entire sorry spectacle is that in a nation with a 244-year history of constitutional republicanism and a free press, a President and his confederates felt so emboldened that they orchestrated what amounts to an attempted coup in what is undoubtedly the greatest political scandal in American history.

So certain were the Obama collaborators they would not only succeed in emasculating President Trump, but they would never be held accountable that one of the prime collaborators, James Clapper, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, unabashedly revealed to Anderson Cooper of CNN in July of 2018 the following (which was completely ignored and buried by the mainstream media):  

If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, including Special Counsel (Robert) Mueller’s investigation.  President Obama is responsible for that.  It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place.

Reading between the lines, Obama not only ordered the review but would have been fully aware of the use of the Steele Dossier.  A totally fabricated document which was the pretext and sole basis of the intelligence assessment, FISA applications and the justification for the Mueller investigation.

President Obama, as he has done throughout his political career, tacitly encouraged his aides and minions to leak to their accomplices in the media any negative, and oftentimes fabricated, whispers about his political rivals.   The Obama Administration holdovers in the new Trump Administration, having been steeped in this duplicity, would also be part of the grand strategy of marginalizing President Trump utilizing an incessant drumbeat of fabricated leaks about Russia, collusion, and Trump’s supposed ineptitude in order to frame public opinion and intimidate the Republicans in Congress. 

During the entirety of the Obama presidency, the Republicans and the mainstream media never held him to account for any scandals that presaged the Russia collusion imbroglio. These include the Fast and Furious cover-up, the use of government agencies to spy on various reporters and news outlets, illegally hacking into the computers in the Senate in order to snoop on and intimidate various senators, and the IRS targeting of conservative organizations in order to undermine their voice in elections.

 

Obama Administration Cabinet, July 2012

Official White House photo by Chuck Kennedy

The egregious, overt and illegal attempt to obliterate Donald Trump and subvert the Constitution was conceived and put into motion by President Obama and his fellow perpetrators because they felt certain that a feckless Republican Party would never fully probe Obama’s motives or actions.   Additionally, Obama was confident a sycophantic mainstream media would never seriously investigate a conspiracy initiated by him, whom they idolized, and they would, in fact, abet the plot to destroy Donald Trump, whom they loathed.

Since 1989 and the election of George H.W. Bush, a majority of Republicans elected to national office have chosen to worship the twin gods of civility and compromise rather than vigorously defend and promote liberty, free enterprise and limited government.  Meanwhile, their political adversaries, the Democratic Party and the Left (now one and the same) had no such compunctions, as they were determined to achieve their ends regardless of the means.  

In conjunction with their accomplices in the mainstream media, Democrats quickly ascertained that any outrageous accusation on their part, such as that Republicans are determined to starve children, would eventuate in the near complete surrender of any opposition to their proposed policies.  Further, rather than support their colleagues in the Party who were oftentimes the victims of specious and malicious accusations, the spineless elites in the Republican Party willingly sacrificed their members on the altar of civility and faux integrity.

On the other hand, in an effort to show a willingness to “compromise” when in control of either or both Houses of Congress, the Republicans inevitably slow-walked or initiated cursory investigations of any Democrat wrongdoing. 

The recently released sworn testimony of Obama’s collaborators, wherein to a person they admit there was no Russian collusion, took place when the Republicans controlled the House of Representatives.  Yet, with this testimony in-hand, Speaker Paul Ryan and Chairman Trey Gowdy publicly proclaimed the FBI and various intelligence agencies did nothing wrong and refused any request by other Republicans on the investigative committees to issue subpoenas to further expose the conspiracy.    Both men also remained steadfast in their support of Robert Mueller and his probe despite the sworn testimony of the Obama co-conspirators. 

In the Republican controlled Senate, the Intelligence Committee under the Chairmanship of Richard Burr essentially exonerated the intelligence community of any wrongdoing by solely focusing on the question of whether Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election in order to assist the Trump campaign and ignoring mountains of evidence that the various intelligence agencies were determined to spy on and undermine the Trump campaign. 

The failure to pursue a thorough and complete investigation to publicly expose the truth allowed the Mueller probe to extend beyond Election Day 2018, costing the Republicans the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi being installed as Speaker, the Ukraine impeachment fiasco, and never-ending investigations of President Trump and his Administration. 

Because of Republican fecklessness nearly 53% of all Americans and 77% of Democrats as of April 2020 still believe the Steele Dossier proved that there was collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign.  Barack Obama and his henchmen’s faith in the spinelessness of the Republicans in Congress was well placed.  

Complicit in skullduggery were the adoring minions in the mainstream media.  Not only were they in the thrall of Obama, but as Donald Trump repeatedly singled them out for their bias and penchant for misreporting during the campaign, they were determined to flex their influence and join in the Obama attempt to destroy him as they breathlessly waited for any leak from their “trusted” sources.   Any story or leak no matter how salacious or false or unproven was banner headlines and fodder for endless cable news coverage.

The obviously inane accusation that Donald Trump was a traitor and beholden to Vladimir Putin was quickly seized upon without any question or justification.

In a little over three years, the Washington Post published nearly 24,000 stories about Trump, Russia and collusion.  The New York Times published over 18,000 stories.  CNN on its website published 11,500 stories.   The wire service Associated Press, which supplies over 1300 local newspapers and broadcasters with news articles, published nearly 12,500 stories.  All told there were probably more than 100,000 stories published in the media, over 90% of which were anti-Trump with virtually no criticism or disclosure of the Obama Administration and their machinations.

Among CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, PBS and NBC, it is estimated that over 20,000 broadcast hours were spent on the Russian collusion narrative again virtually all anti-Trump as many of the Obama collaborators were retained as contributors on these networks.  Barack Obama’s faith in the cooperation of the mainstream media was also well placed.

Standing athwart this onslaught was President Trump, his Twitter account, impartial investigative bloggers, conservative leaning websites, talk radio, a handful of tenacious Republican members of the House and the opinion hosts on Fox News.   

Without Donald Trump’s resolve and tenacity, along with the determination of his small cadre of stalwart allies, the Obama coup attempt might well have succeeded in so marginalizing the Trump presidency that he would have been abandoned by the Republicans in Congress and, in all likelihood, been forced to resign.  No other Republican president since Abraham Lincoln, with the possible exception of Ronald Reagan, would have been able to survive and turn the tables on his tormentors.

Nonetheless, Barack Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their machinations to undermine an election and then overthrow a presidency if it were not for the fecklessness of the Republican Party and the blind eye as well as the overt support of the mainstream media.  His de facto co-conspirators. 

via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

Newsom holds cops and firefighters hostage to get federal cash to hand out to illegals

California Governor, Gavin Newsom, continues to prove he is an evil tyrant willing to use any and all measures to achieve his goals.

Most recently, despite a $54+ billion budget deficit, he decided to hand out stimulus relief money to illegal invaders. As soon as word got out about this giveaway for those whose first act on American soil was to break the law, phone lines were overloaded and ultimately crashed as illegals called to find out how they could get their money.

No matter that he’s throwing $500 chunks of money at every illegal invader in his sanctuary state, Newsom is demanding a federal bailout claiming the feds have a “social responsibility” and a “moral and ethical obligation.”

And if the federal government doesn’t step up and pay, police and firefighters will be the first to go because, apparently, in Newsom’s world that’s logical and is just how it goes.

Huh?

Why are first responders first up on the chopping block?

Of course, it makes no sense unless you want to use the most critical people and services as hostages. And that’s exactly what Newsom is doing.

All the while, he’s setting the table to frame the GOP as heartless. No sooner had he made his lofty claims about “moral responsibility,” he pre-emptively accused the GOP of depriving first responders of jobs if the federal government doesn’t pay. The Patriot Daily reports:

“…The next time they want to salute and celebrate our heroes, our first responders, our police officers and firefighters, consider the fact that they are the first ones that will be laid off by cities and counties…”

Newsom’s budget has other provisions for trying to close the budget gap, but eliminating first responder jobs is sick threat he will keep front and center as it affords him the most leverage to try to get what he wants.

The GOP had better hold firm. Blue state bailouts will open yet another door to stimulus dollars the rack up trillions in debt while allowing blue states off the hook for financial mismanagement and egregious public policies.

And, as a general rule of thumb, I believe the United States does not pay ransom money for hostages. Let’s not start now.

Image credit: vectorisation

California Governor, Gavin Newsom, continues to prove he is an evil tyrant willing to use any and all measures to achieve his goals.

Most recently, despite a $54+ billion budget deficit, he decided to hand out stimulus relief money to illegal invaders. As soon as word got out about this giveaway for those whose first act on American soil was to break the law, phone lines were overloaded and ultimately crashed as illegals called to find out how they could get their money.

No matter that he’s throwing $500 chunks of money at every illegal invader in his sanctuary state, Newsom is demanding a federal bailout claiming the feds have a “social responsibility” and a “moral and ethical obligation.”

And if the federal government doesn’t step up and pay, police and firefighters will be the first to go because, apparently, in Newsom’s world that’s logical and is just how it goes.

Huh?

Why are first responders first up on the chopping block?

Of course, it makes no sense unless you want to use the most critical people and services as hostages. And that’s exactly what Newsom is doing.

All the while, he’s setting the table to frame the GOP as heartless. No sooner had he made his lofty claims about “moral responsibility,” he pre-emptively accused the GOP of depriving first responders of jobs if the federal government doesn’t pay. The Patriot Daily reports:

“…The next time they want to salute and celebrate our heroes, our first responders, our police officers and firefighters, consider the fact that they are the first ones that will be laid off by cities and counties…”

Newsom’s budget has other provisions for trying to close the budget gap, but eliminating first responder jobs is sick threat he will keep front and center as it affords him the most leverage to try to get what he wants.

The GOP had better hold firm. Blue state bailouts will open yet another door to stimulus dollars the rack up trillions in debt while allowing blue states off the hook for financial mismanagement and egregious public policies.

And, as a general rule of thumb, I believe the United States does not pay ransom money for hostages. Let’s not start now.

Image credit: vectorisation

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Michigan: Gretchen Whitmer seeds the nursing homes with COVID-19

In light of the nursing home disaster in New York, what kind of a ghoul would take that as an example to emulate instead of a baleful death warning, and then order contagious COVID-19 patients into her state’s nursing homes?

Only Michigan’s hard-faced Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, the ambitious Democrat who banned sales of garden seeds to Michiganders, saying she’s doing it in the name of keeping everyone ’safe.’

‘Safe’ to Whitmer is seeding the nursing homes with COVID-19 patients, supposedly as a means of lightening the loads of hospitals. Too bad if granny gets it. Under Whitmer’s executive order, which she just extended yesterday for a week, any nursing home with less than 80% capacity will be forced to create special COVID units, regardless of their ability to protect their other patients, with the special ventilation systems, trained staff, and personal protective gear something like that would require even if it were advisable, and none of which are included in her order.

If I were a nursing home, I’d be offering free places to anyone who wants one just to prevent a breach below that deadly 80-percent threshold. 

 Even New York’s Andrew Cuomo could see the disaster of that outrageous and deadly policy. Nursing home deaths in New York are sky-high at more than 5,000 deaths, and since the outrageous order was exposed as his own administration’s doing, he’s backtracked, blaming everyone but himself.

Yet Whitmer, by contrast, viewed Cuomo’s bad maneuver as a ‘how-to’ guide. There will be deaths with even this one-week extension, and the blood will be on her hands.

It’s as if she wants them all dead. Easier to harvest their ballots when they’re dead come election day is one thought that springs to mind. Or maybe she’s attempting to goose the death count numbers, the better to claim federal funds. Or possibly the opposite. The nursing home figures are muddled and non-transparent, something that leads many observers to think the death toll numbers are far higher than the official count. Hospital figures, by contrast, are more clearly counted and reported. Or maybe she wants to clear out the nursing homes of patients, the better to cut down on the Medicaid expenses to the state.

None of these potential calculi have a scintilla of mortality to them, every last one is utterly vile in intention. Yet here she goes, and now Joe Biden has been holding ‘preliminary‘ talks with her to make her his vice presidential running mate. On top of old people’s bodies.

I have a stake in this personally — my elderly aunt is in one of these Michigan nursing homes – not far from Shelby Township, center of the legislative resistance to this fiasco, and the whole thing is terrifying to the family. For the last two months, her children and grandchildren and great grandchildren have been visiting her through the nursing home glass in order to protect her from potential virus infection, never hugging, never holding hands, just doing it prison-style, solely to protect her. With Whitmer’s order, no there’s no potential virus infection to protect her from, what’s going in now is lethal, live and real, going in by force of law. People inside those homes have absolutely no defense.

Which is more than just immoral, as if that were something that would mean something to her, it’s politically stupid. Cuomo has torpedoed his own chances for ever achieving higher office after revelations came out about his outrageous order. He’s forever associated with nursing home dead people, a charge that will follow him wherever he goes. Whitmer is following him like a lemming off that cliff, not noticing what it’s done to Cuomo. She needs to run, not walk back, that order if she ever wants to save a scrap of hope of saving her political future, running mate or no running mate. Angry voters who’ve just lost their mothers and fathers to this beyond-evil folly are likely to dog her wherever she goes.

And don’t think she doesn’t know it. The Detroit News has run a big editorial demanding that this order be scrapped immediately.

Elderly people have been needlessly exposed to the virus and died as a result of that order.

The Detroit News pointed out that Florida’s Gov. Rick DeSantis has managed to protect Florida’s nursing home population, while New York’s nursing home death toll has exceeded Florida’s 30 times over. It takes no genius — and no ‘study’ as Whitmer put it, to know that that’s a killer.

The Washington Examiner has railed against this Whitmer outrage, too. 

You can bet the voters have noticed and Whitmer might be hearing from them, too. And still she persists.

It goes to show that someone capable of issuing a vindictive little petty tyranny, such as banning sales of garden seeds, is perfectly, capable of issuing a big tyranny, too, a death sentence to innocent old people though the most lethal, harm-inducing order imaginable. Go into that room and breathe the COVID, granny. It’s the doing of someone making the most Machiavellian of calculations, taking everything but the lives of human beings into account, if for nothing else, because she has grown power-mad. One can only hope that in this vile order, she has the sowed seeds of her own political destruction even as the old people are put into the ground. 

Image credit: cjh 1452000 via Wikimedia Commons

 

 

 

 

 

 

In light of the nursing home disaster in New York, what kind of a ghoul would take that as an example to emulate instead of a baleful death warning, and then order contagious COVID-19 patients into her state’s nursing homes?

Only Michigan’s hard-faced Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, the ambitious Democrat who banned sales of garden seeds to Michiganders, saying she’s doing it in the name of keeping everyone ’safe.’

‘Safe’ to Whitmer is seeding the nursing homes with COVID-19 patients, supposedly as a means of lightening the loads of hospitals. Too bad if granny gets it. Under Whitmer’s executive order, which she just extended yesterday for a week, any nursing home with less than 80% capacity will be forced to create special COVID units, regardless of their ability to protect their other patients, with the special ventilation systems, trained staff, and personal protective gear something like that would require even if it were advisable, and none of which are included in her order.

If I were a nursing home, I’d be offering free places to anyone who wants one just to prevent a breach below that deadly 80-percent threshold. 

 Even New York’s Andrew Cuomo could see the disaster of that outrageous and deadly policy. Nursing home deaths in New York are sky-high at more than 5,000 deaths, and since the outrageous order was exposed as his own administration’s doing, he’s backtracked, blaming everyone but himself.

Yet Whitmer, by contrast, viewed Cuomo’s bad maneuver as a ‘how-to’ guide. There will be deaths with even this one-week extension, and the blood will be on her hands.

It’s as if she wants them all dead. Easier to harvest their ballots when they’re dead come election day is one thought that springs to mind. Or maybe she’s attempting to goose the death count numbers, the better to claim federal funds. Or possibly the opposite. The nursing home figures are muddled and non-transparent, something that leads many observers to think the death toll numbers are far higher than the official count. Hospital figures, by contrast, are more clearly counted and reported. Or maybe she wants to clear out the nursing homes of patients, the better to cut down on the Medicaid expenses to the state.

None of these potential calculi have a scintilla of mortality to them, every last one is utterly vile in intention. Yet here she goes, and now Joe Biden has been holding ‘preliminary‘ talks with her to make her his vice presidential running mate. On top of old people’s bodies.

I have a stake in this personally — my elderly aunt is in one of these Michigan nursing homes – not far from Shelby Township, center of the legislative resistance to this fiasco, and the whole thing is terrifying to the family. For the last two months, her children and grandchildren and great grandchildren have been visiting her through the nursing home glass in order to protect her from potential virus infection, never hugging, never holding hands, just doing it prison-style, solely to protect her. With Whitmer’s order, no there’s no potential virus infection to protect her from, what’s going in now is lethal, live and real, going in by force of law. People inside those homes have absolutely no defense.

Which is more than just immoral, as if that were something that would mean something to her, it’s politically stupid. Cuomo has torpedoed his own chances for ever achieving higher office after revelations came out about his outrageous order. He’s forever associated with nursing home dead people, a charge that will follow him wherever he goes. Whitmer is following him like a lemming off that cliff, not noticing what it’s done to Cuomo. She needs to run, not walk back, that order if she ever wants to save a scrap of hope of saving her political future, running mate or no running mate. Angry voters who’ve just lost their mothers and fathers to this beyond-evil folly are likely to dog her wherever she goes.

And don’t think she doesn’t know it. The Detroit News has run a big editorial demanding that this order be scrapped immediately.

Elderly people have been needlessly exposed to the virus and died as a result of that order.

The Detroit News pointed out that Florida’s Gov. Rick DeSantis has managed to protect Florida’s nursing home population, while New York’s nursing home death toll has exceeded Florida’s 30 times over. It takes no genius — and no ‘study’ as Whitmer put it, to know that that’s a killer.

The Washington Examiner has railed against this Whitmer outrage, too. 

You can bet the voters have noticed and Whitmer might be hearing from them, too. And still she persists.

It goes to show that someone capable of issuing a vindictive little petty tyranny, such as banning sales of garden seeds, is perfectly, capable of issuing a big tyranny, too, a death sentence to innocent old people though the most lethal, harm-inducing order imaginable. Go into that room and breathe the COVID, granny. It’s the doing of someone making the most Machiavellian of calculations, taking everything but the lives of human beings into account, if for nothing else, because she has grown power-mad. One can only hope that in this vile order, she has the sowed seeds of her own political destruction even as the old people are put into the ground. 

Image credit: cjh 1452000 via Wikimedia Commons

 

 

 

 

 

 

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Horowitz: We have been lied to: 6 facts that change everything we know about SARS-CoV-2

James Madison once said, “A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both.” The coronavirus fascists have succeeded in cementing their illogical, immoral, and illegal policies through the prism of false information about the timing of the virus, the specific nature and severity of the overall fatality rate, the number of actual deaths, and the utility (or perhaps harm) of lockdown policies in actually mitigating deaths – all the while obfuscating the much higher collateral deaths and damage caused by the lockdown itself.

Every day we learn new information demonstrating the lies driving lockdown. Here are some of the most important ones from over the weekend.

1) The shocking inflation of COVID-19 death numbers: From day one, we were warned that states are ascribing every single death of anyone who happens to test positive for the coronavirus — even if they are asymptomatic — to the virus rather than the clear cause of death. Now, thanks to a lawsuit in Colorado, the state was forced to revise its death count down by 23 % over the weekend — from 1,150 to 878. The state is now publishing numbers of deaths “with” COVID-19 separate from deaths “from” COVID-19. As I reported on Thursday, county officials started accusing the state’s department of health of reclassifying deaths of those who tested positive for the virus but died of things like alcohol poisoning as COVID-19 deaths just to insidiously inflate the numbers. This revision in Colorado is a bombshell story that, of course, will remain unknown to most Americans. Every state needs to do this, and if they did, we would find an across-the-board drop in numbers by at least 25%, the same %age by which Dr. Birx reportedly believes the count is being inflated, according to the Washington Post. For example, in Minnesota, state officials are now admitting that every single person who dies in a nursing home after testing positive is now deemed to have died from the virus, never mind the fact that 25% of all natural deaths in a given week occur in nursing homes and that most cases of COVID-19 are asymptomatic, which means more often than not, they died exclusively of other causes.

2) States with longer lockdowns had worse results: Kyle Lamb posted a solid analysis on Twitter, grouping states by how long they implemented a lockdown and averaging out the deaths per 100,000 people by each grouping. The results are stounding, as there is a perfectly inverse relationship between how long a state implemented a lockdown and how successful it was in keeping the deaths down. I independently cross-checked these numbers, and they appear to be accurate.

While this doesn’t necessarily prove that lockdowns cause more COVID-19 deaths (although they definitely cause other deaths), it’s nearly impossible to assert the other way around – that lockdowns prevent deaths – if we see zero correlation in the data. This is especially true given that Florida is the third most populous state and has the highest concentration of seniors, yet deaths and hospitalizations are way down since the state reopened on May 4. Florida is more densely populated than Michigan and Pennsylvania, yet has one-sixth and one-fourth of the deaths per capita, respectively. The same holds true for Georgia, which is a fairly densely populated state. Infections are down over 40% and deaths are down 31% since reopening. As Secretary of Health Alex Azar said yesterday, “We are seeing that in places that are opening, we’re not seeing this spike in cases. We still see spikes in some areas that are, in fact, closed.”

3) Outside nursing homes, the fatality rate never warranted such action, even if it would work: Every day we find more hard data showing that the overwhelming majority of cases are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, and outside nursing homes, the chance of dying is very low and very limited to a population we can more efficiently shield. For those who are younger and healthier, deaths are almost nonexistent. Spain was one of the hardest-hit countries and has a higher overall fatality rate than others, yet its age-stratified fatality rates mirror what we have seen in the Netherlands, Denmark, France, and elsewhere. One Twitter commentator has broken down the age-based fatality rates of the comprehensive Spanish antibody study, and the results are similar to what we’ve seen elsewhere: 

He used public information to calculate the case data and the population age data, and I have spot-checked some data points and they all seem on target. It’s identical to what the Netherlands found.

Remember, Spain was one of the hardest-hit countries, but even there, 57% of all deaths and the overwhelming majority of deaths of those above age 80 were in senior care facilities. When you take them out of the equation, the death rates are shockingly low. Yet the same politicians who focused on locking up an entire country failed to care for those in nursing homes. This demographic COVID-19 death chart from Massachusetts speaks volumes about the targeted scope of the danger.

It’s essentially the same story in every state.

4) Outside New York, this is barely worse than bad flu seasons: While Europe is opening its schools, almost every U.S. state continues to keep schools shut. Yet according to the CDC’s latest weekly report, “For children (0-17 years), COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than influenza hospitalization rates at comparable time points during recent influenza seasons.” Even the World Health Organization’s top scientist just admitted that children “seem less capable of spreading the virus.” As for everyone else, if you look at the bump in overall deaths for most states (outside the tristate area), they are either at, slightly below, or slight above the 2018 flu season. But at this point, everything is way below a typical flu season in the winter, yet you wouldn’t know it from listening to the media. According to the CDC, hospitalizations and deaths have been declining in all 10 designated regions for the past 3-7 weeks. Still, we are now being more fascist that even Italy in violating civil rights.

5) Excess deaths are from the lockdowns, not the virus: While there is zero evidence that lockdowns saved any lives of coronavirus patients, there is clear evidence they cost other lives. It has been observed in a number of states that there are excess deaths being detected, primarily from people dying at home. The CDC is predicting 21,462-40,097 excess deaths NOT due to COVID-19, likely from those too scared to come to the ER because of the exaggerated risk being associated with COVID-19. Also, a recent analysis of excess deaths in England shows that they are seeing thousands of people dying at home from other symptoms because of the lockdown.

6) Social distancing was invented by a high-school kid and politicians, not scientists: Jeffrey Tucker of the American Institute for Economic research reports that the origin of this cult of “social distancing” being used for totalitarian lockdowns was the brainchild of a high schooler’s sociology paper in 2006, promoted by the Bush administration during the avian flu. It was widely mocked by the epidemiological community, including by Johns Hopkins, for “causing the potential for a ‘serious adverse outcome,’” thereby ensuring that “a manageable epidemic could move toward catastrophe.”

How have we allowed such an illogical approach to crush our liberties, economy, hospitals, education, and criminal justice? How have we lost our freedoms?

The answer is that the public is not getting the right information. This is why the political class is doing everything in its power to censor anyone who dares question the idolatry of this lockdown cult. YouTube has censored the videos of Knut Wittkowski, who was a top epidemiologist in Germany and then served as the head of biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design at Rockefeller University. One would think we’d want to hear his opinion, but there is only one view that is allowed to gain traction. Why is it that only one side is scared of the information of the other side?

As James Madison warned, “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

Editor’s note: This article has been corrected to note that Florida is the third most populous state, not the fourth. CR regrets the error.

The post Horowitz: We have been lied to: 6 facts that change everything we know about SARS-CoV-2 appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com