It Already Pays Better To Be Unemployed… Illegals Next?

It Already Pays Better To Be Unemployed… Illegals Next?

Tyler Durden

Mon, 05/18/2020 – 13:30

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk,

In many states workers can do better collecting unemployment than being employed.

Please consider the Coronavirus Unemployment Calculator to determine when and where it’s better not to work.

Under the CARES Act, Americans laid off due to the coronavirus receive an additional $600 a week for the next four months, ending July 31st or upon employment. In addition, the unemployment window has been increased in each state by 13 weeks.

Massachusetts generous unemployment policies combined with the stimulus means all workers making under $73,996 would receive more a week unemployed than they do from working.

Many of these salaries outstrip the state’s median income, meaning the majority of workers would receive more from an unemployment check than a paycheck.

The stimulus package made significant changes to state unemployment. For the next four months, the unemployed will receive an additional $2,400 a month. Similarly, the added 13 weeks provides people longer to find a job in a new hostile job market.

The new package does mean a good chunk of the workforce are now receiving paychecks smaller than they would on unemployment. This includes workers in essential businesses, including hospitals and super markets, who are putting themselves in harm’s way to keep society running.

This is ridiculous of course.

The next stimulus measure needs to cap the benefit at some percentage below what people were making. 

Instead, the next package aims to increase the amounts and pay illegal immigrants as well.

Under threat of a progressive revolt, the House Narrowly Passes $3 Trillion Aid Package

The House narrowly passed a sprawling, $3 trillion coronavirus-relief package Friday night, capping a weeklong effort by Democratic leaders to quash rebellions from various wings of their party.

The House bill includes about $1 trillion in direct aid to states and localities, including grants and education assistance, to deal with the effects of the pandemic. It would put a new round of one-time cash payments into Americans’ bank accounts, extend the duration of enhanced jobless benefits, help cover some rents and mortgages, forgive some student-loan debt and send premium pay to essential workers in fields such as health care.

The bill overcame a key hurdle Friday night when Democratic leaders were able to beat back a Republican effort to strip out a contentious provision enabling undocumented immigrants who have tax identification numbers to receive direct stimulus paymentsKey blocs of liberal and Hispanic lawmakers had threatened to oppose the overall bill if that measure were removed, but voting to preserve it was a political challenge for more centrist Democrats, particularly those in districts won by President Trump.

Republicans made clear that the bill has no prospect of advancing in the GOP-led Senate. “It’s a parade of absurdities that can hardly be taken seriously,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said Thursday on Fox News. Mr. McConnell said that he had spoken recently with President Trump and cabinet officials and that they agree another bill is probably necessary but that “it’s not going to be a $3 trillion left-wing wish list like the speaker is apparently going to try to jam down the throats of her majority.”

Undocumented Definition

Undocumented means illegal.

But it is politically incorrect to be correct. 

Dead on Arrival

The bill of course is dead on arrival in the Senate. 

Heck even 14 Democrats could not stomach the bill, and that’s saying quite a lot.

Undocumented Giveaway in California

Meanwhile, in California, Governor Newsom will give $125 million to "undocumented immigrants" affected by coronavirus. 

They can apply for Covid-19 Relief starting Monday.

California is home to more than 2 million undocumented immigrants who aren’t eligible to receive unemployment or stimulus checks from the government.

But the state has set up funding to help support them during the coronavirus crisis, providing $125 million through a public-private partnership. It’s been touted as the first fund of its kind to support undocumented immigrants. The state will contribute $75 million to the fund, with the remaining $50 million coming from private philanthropic partners.

Public-Private Giveaway

California is willing to give $75 million in taxpayer money to illegal immigrants if private philanthropic partners contribute $50 million to the pot. 

Lovely.

This Mess Could Have Been Largely Solved

On January 24, 2018, Democrats offered Trump $20 billion for a wall. .

Senate minority leader Schumer went to the White House and told Trump he could have his wall. “The president picked a number for the wall, and I accepted it,” Schumer recalled in the midst of the shutdown. He had agreed to a significant sum of money for the wall—reported to be $20 billion, though the Democrat’s office will neither confirm nor deny that figure—in exchange for Trump’s support of permanent protections for the nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants covered under the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Negotiation Points

  • Dreamers need to verify address

  • Dreamers need to have no criminal background

  • Dreamers need to have been in the US for x number of years (x negotiable)

  • Dreamers need to apply for a Dreamer’s Card and will immediately be accepted if they meet the above criteria

  • Dreamers not applying for a card and caught in a crime would immediately be deported

  • e-Verify tightened

That was one hell of a great starting point that Schumer threw on Trump’s lap.

Instead, Trump got next to nothing for a wall and we still have an immigration mess.

Some of these illegals have been here 5 years or longer, have kids that are US citizens, and are productive members of society. 

Instead of verifying criminal backgrounds and granting a path for citizenship for those who have been her five years or more, the plan is to slosh around money to  all the illegals on a first come first serve basis in California, and to all of them in the House Plan.

This kind of progressive nonsense will not help the Democrats in  November.

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

OUTRAGEOUS! Another Delay! — Judge Emmet Sullivan’s ‘Stand-in’ Judge Gleeson to Argue Against DOJ in Flynn Case … NEXT MONTH!


John Gleeson

Last week Judge Emmet Sullivan appointed a retired Clinton Judge to fight back against Trump’s DOJ, US Attorney General William Barr and General Flynn.

The Justice Department dropped its case against General Mike Flynn a couple weeks ago after bombshell documents released proved he was framed by Comey’s FBI.

But Judge Sullivan last Tuesday extended the case by soliciting amicus briefs to allow for public comment on Flynn’s criminal case.

Then Judge Sullivan took his unethical behavior to a whole other level.

In a dirty, politically motivated move, Judge Sullivan appointed retired Clinton judge John Gleeson to argue against the government’s motion to dismiss the charge against Flynn and to look at whether Flynn could be held in criminal contempt for perjury.

On Monday, it was revealed John Gleeson will file an initial amicus brief by JUNE 10!

Another huge delay!

John Gleeson in a motion filed Monday asked the Court permission to submit a brief addressing three issues.

One of the issues: “any factual development I may need before finalizing my argument in opposition to the government’s motion in this case.”

By “factual development” – he may claim he needs to interview witnesses, says attorney Techno Fog.

On May 11, 2020, John Gleeson penned a Washington post article titled, “The Flynn case isn’t over until the judge says it’s over“.

John Gleeson also represented despicable deep state heroine Sally Yates and supervised Mueller’s “pitbull” Andrew Weissmann.

If John Gleeson calls in additional witnesses, this may delay Flynn’s case well into late summer/early fall!

The post OUTRAGEOUS! Another Delay! — Judge Emmet Sullivan’s ‘Stand-in’ Judge Gleeson to Argue Against DOJ in Flynn Case … NEXT MONTH! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

WAYNE ROOT: Obama and Me: How I Knew Obama Was a Bad Guy Before Anyone Else

By Wayne Allyn Root

I’ve been writing about “Obama the bad guy” for many years. I was the first to name him the head of the “Obama Crime Family.” I was the first to coin the phrase “Obamagate” to describe his reign of crimes against candidate and then President Donald J. Trump.

Obama’s public persona was always a scam. I just knew the real Obama- way before anyone else caught on.

Take the column published days ago at Slate magazine by a liberal hack apologist for Obama. He sounded the usual liberal talking points: there is no “Obamagate.” There is no scandal. It’s a conservative conspiracy.

Then this liberal “Obama denier” named names of who the conservative liars are- Trump, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity and Wayne Allyn Root (yours truly).

These liberal hacks must all be reading off the same talking points. Only days before, I received a text from a liberal group urging Democrat voters to call their Congressman demanding more free money. Then they named the enemies of Democrats, standing in the way of more government aid- President Trump, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin and Wayne Allyn Root.

The same five names in both attack pieces. Interesting. All I can say is, “What an honor to be on that list. I’ve clearly just made All-Pro.”

But the liberal hack at Slate got the timing wrong. He quoted my column about “Obamagate” from 2019. I’ve actually been on top of this story since 2016.

Throughout 2016 and 2017, I wrote dozens of newspaper columns about the deep state conspiracy against Trump. In my newspaper column on September 23, 2017, I finally gave it a name, “Obamagate.” Because I knew every part of the scandal had Obama’s fingerprints all over it.

Obama was the capo di tutti of the Obama Crime Family. He gave the orders, he gave the approval, he was always in the room as each crime was hatched.

How did I know before anyone else? Why did I believe Obama was capable of committing such high crimes and treason? Because of my personal history with Obama.

I was Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, Class of 1983. We were both Pre-Law and political science majors. I was also on the Libertarian Presidential ticket in 2008- the first time in US history that college classmates ran on opposing presidential tickets. What are the odds?

During the 2008 campaign, I was asked in hundreds of media interviews, “Were you two friends at Columbia University? What was Obama like?” I always answered honestly, “I never met him, never saw him, never heard of him. And I don’t know a single classmate who ever met him either.” I repeated this story hundreds of times.

At the time, I was also a regular guest on Fox News, where I branded Obama as a radical socialist whose policies would ruin the US economy, retard economic growth, and kill millions of jobs. I was proven right. That must have made Obama even more angry.

I had clearly gotten under President Obama’s skin. Soon the IRS came knocking. I was targeted for destruction. It was a witch hunt, persecution and intimidation all in one.

It was the worst IRS attack any tax lawyer I spoke to had ever heard about. They all agreed that I was on the president’s “Enemies List.”

Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch took my case and together over a two-year period we forced the IRS to hand over my personal tax files. This was a political persecution based on my conservative political beliefs. The proof was literally written all over my files.

Who do you think ordered it?

President Obama clearly hated my guts because I had embarrassed him repeatedly in the national media. So, he decided to use the power of government to destroy me. That’s a crime, by the way.

If Obama hated me that much, think how he felt about famous billionaire celebrity Donald Trump, who had questioned whether Obama was even an American citizen. Trump had tortured Obama in the national media. Now Trump was about to succeed Obama as president with a promise to erase everything Obama had accomplished.

That’s how I knew.

If Obama sent multiple government agencies after his college classmate Wayne Root, think what he’d be willing to do to Donald Trump? The answer is anything and everything. Spying; unmasking; leaking; framing Trump and his top advisors; and then eventually in desperation when all else failed- a full-blown coup.

It was all Obama. It was always Obama.

The real Obama is nothing like his public persona. The real Obama is a ruthless bad guy. I should know. I was the first to experience the crimes of Barack Obama- up close and personal.

That’s how I knew Obama was a bad guy before anyone else.

Wayne Allyn Root is the host of the nationally-syndicated radio show, “Wayne Allyn Root: Raw & Unfiltered” on USA Radio Network from 6 PM to 9 PM EST M-F. Listen live at https://ift.tt/2g4uzmV

The post WAYNE ROOT: Obama and Me: How I Knew Obama Was a Bad Guy Before Anyone Else appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

WATCH: Trump Campaign Launches New True Crime Style Video and Website Aimed At Joe Biden

The Trump campaign has launched a true crime style website and YouTube show aimed at former Vice President Joe Biden titled “The Truth Over Facts.”

The website aims to uncover “the truth behind Joe Biden’s never-ending, seemingly incomprehensible statements.”

The branding is likely a play on a gaffe Biden made during a speech in Iowa last year, saying “we choose truth over facts.”

“If you have any tips related to the discovery of truth over facts, text TRUTH to 88022,” the website says.

The Trump campaign told The Wrap that they will be trying to “unlock the secrets behind Joe Biden’s incomprehensible babbling.””

“The American people deserve to know the truth behind Joe Biden’s delirious and nonsensical claims on the campaign trail,” said Tim Murtaugh, the Trump campaign’s communications director. “When he’s mangling the text of the Declaration of Independence or calling someone a ‘lying, dog-faced pony soldier,’ is he really speaking a language that only he and a select group of others understand? This campaign for president cannot be allowed to continue for one more minute until we try to unlock the secrets behind Joe Biden’s incomprehensible babbling.”

The post WATCH: Trump Campaign Launches New True Crime Style Video and Website Aimed At Joe Biden appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

The real climate science deniers

The real climate science deniersManmade climate crisis promoters reject inconvenient evidence of natural climate change 

Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that pollution, often dramatically. 

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

BREAKING: Plandemic Documentary Website Hacked and Defaced

The website for the viral Plandemic documentary has been hacked and defaced by what appears to be a very outraged leftist.

The documentary has faced intense backlash from Democrats, with journalists even taking the time to write scripts for leftists to use to counter any friends or relatives who may have watched it.

Despite being censored by YouTube, the documentary has been viewed millions of times on BitChute and other platforms. It features an interview with Dr. Judy Mikovitz, a virologist who claims that the coronavirus was created in a laboratory and that wearing a mask will endanger people and cause them to be repeatedly reinfected.

On Monday afternoon, PlandemicMovie.com website, which redirects to WatchPlandemic.com, was hacked and replaced with a black screen and bullet points claiming that the film is wrong and that Dr. Mikovitz, the focus of the documentary, is “bat sh-t crazy.” The site normally features places for people to watch it, since it keeps getting censored and removed from various platforms.

“The world is scary now. Believing that this is all part of a global conspiracy is more comforting than the truth. If we give into fear and ignore *actual* science things will only get worse,” the hacker wrote.

The hacker did not provide any sources or material to refute specific claims in the documentary, simply a bullet point list of assertions.

The Gateway Pundit has reached out to people working on the documentary for comment and will update this article if one is provided.

The post BREAKING: Plandemic Documentary Website Hacked and Defaced appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Elon Musk Ignites Firestorm with Cryptic Message Suggesting He’s Turning to the Right

Tesla CEO Elon Musk ignited a firestorm on social media after he tweeted a cryptic message apparently linking himself to the conservative movement.

The sometimes controversial billionaire has been critical of the heavy-handed government response to the coronavirus pandemic in recent weeks, and has been particularly open about his displeasure with the state of California, where Tesla is headquartered.

Sunday, Musk tweeted a reference to the film “The Matrix” which has become synonymous with those aligning themselves with free-thinking, anti-Big Brother conservative ideology.

Musk posted a red rose emoji on Twitter and told his 34 million followers: “Take the red pill.”

TRENDING: Hospital Worker with Coronavirus Found Dead with Her Small Child by Her Side, Hospital Issues Statement

The post was followed by another cryptic reference to “The Matrix,” in which Musk shared an image of the film’s character Morpheus, portrayed by actor Laurence Fishburne, displaying a red pill and a blue pill.

Do you agree with Elon Musk that California officials are ignoring constitutional rights?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

In the 1999 film, Morpheus presents the film’s protagonist with the option of taking either a red pill to experience an awakening of truth or a blue pill to continue living in ignorance.

Musk’s “red pill” tweet immediately drew responses from both conservatives and liberals and was shared nearly 100,000 times in less than 24 hours.

Ivanka Trump, the eldest daughter of President Donald Trump, responded to Musk and wrote that she had “taken” the red pill.

RELATED: Podcasting Giant Threatens To Leave California for Texas Over Lockdown, Taxes: ‘I’m Not Kidding’

The Tesla co-founder’s post was well-received by many of Twitter’s most ardent conservatives, while liberals on the social media site expressed their vexation at Musk.

“The Matrix” co-director, a man born as Andrew Paul Wachowski who announced he was transgender in 2016 and began going as Lilly Wachowski, attacked both musk and Ivanka Trump for referencing his movie.

“F— both of you,” Wachowski wrote in response to Ivanka’s tweet.

Musk, who shared in 2018 that he viewed himself as a “socialist,” has emerged as an unlikely ally to those arguing against government lockdown orders in recent months.

On March 6, before much of the country was shut down, Musk described the panic surrounding the coronavirus as “dumb.”

On May 14, Musk shared a popular meme on Twitter poking fun at Karl Marx.

The meme shows a philosophical argument about time throughout history and portrays Marx as arguing that time was invented by capitalists so that they can “sell more clocks.”

On May 9, Musk threatened to leave California and take his company with him, reminding the state’s leaders that Tesla is the last remaining car manufacturer in the Golden State.

In the same thread, he blasted an “unelected” health official for defying President Donald Trump and the “Constitutional freedoms” of Californians.

On May 11, Musk stated that he had ordered his Tesla production facility in Fremont, California, to reopen in defiance of California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s stay-at-home mandate.

“Tesla is restarting production today against Alameda County rules. I will be on the line with everyone else. If anyone is arrested, I ask that it only be me,” he wrote.

President Trump tweeted in support of Musk reopening his facility.

“California should let Tesla & @elonmusk open the plant, NOW. It can be done Fast & Safely!” Trump tweeted.

CNN Business reported that during an April Tesla earnings call, Musk labeled stay-at-home orders “fascist.”

The billionaire stated his belief that lockdown orders were “forcibly imprisoning people in their homes.”

Musk has also recently been critical of CNN — a position many American conservatives would also support.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Video Shows Woman Arrested for Sitting on Beach, Holding ‘We Are Free’ Sign

Here’s a hypothetical for you.

Let’s say you’re a police officer in Miami Beach. Your beaches are still closed even though most of the rest of Florida’s beaches are still open. Needless to say, you’re facing some protests.

When it comes to protesters, you don’t want to send the wrong message: You’re not heavy-handed, you just want to enforce the law. So how do you approach the case of a woman who’s flopped herself down on a closed beach with a sign saying “We Are Free” and refuses to leave?

If your choice is to send a handful of police officers out there to force her to leave and then carry her prone body off of the beach when she refuses, I’d argue you made the wrong choice. But then, I’m not a member of the Miami-Dade Police Department, who made that choice over the weekend.

According to WTVJ, Kimberly Falkenstine, 33, was arrested by four police officers after she entered the beach as part of a coronavirus lockdown protest Sunday. Falkenstine was part of a protest that started in nearby Lummus Park, although she broke off to protest on the shoreline.

TRENDING: Hospital Worker with Coronavirus Found Dead with Her Small Child by Her Side, Hospital Issues Statement

“The defendant stated she left the designated protest area and wanted to sit on the beach to make a statement,” a police report said.

According to the report, four officers went out to inform her that she was in violation of the emergency lockdown order. They told her to leave, but she refused.

“The defendant mentioned that the beach was for the public and that it was her right to be there,” the report said. She now faces charges of violating an emergency order, resisting an officer without violence and trespassing. She was booked into jail and released on $2,500 bail.

This is a very just-the-facts, inverted-pyramid-style way of reporting the encounter, however. It doesn’t hammer home just how farcical and counterproductive the whole thing was.

Do you think this arrest was called for?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

Here’s the full livestream video, posted by fellow protester Chris Nelson. The arrest itself begins around the 28:00 mark:

There’s nothing that looks like the overuse of force quite like four men carrying a lockdown protester off of the beach even though she was posing no danger to anyone. This is especially true when she’s on the beach, where the coronavirus is unlikely to spread.

One of the great canards used against lockdown protesters is that these are usually people who would be telling other protesters to respect police authority — particularly if they were liberal protesters violating the law.

The same thing could be turned around, though: Those cheering on the arrest of lockdown protesters are usually those who would frown upon an excessive display of police authority.

RELATED: Leftists Will Be Furious with Ron DeSantis After He Said Governors Are Not ‘Dictators’

The question, in the end, is one of proportionality. If a single liberal protester were to rip through some fluorescent orange tape, plop themselves in the sand on a closed beach and tell police officers that they’d have to drag her off of there, at what point would anyone want to see them arrested? Wouldn’t you assume that’s what they wanted you to do when they went through the barriers in the first place?

Instead, this woman’s forcible removal from the beach was livestreamed on Facebook and has gotten play in not just local media but outlets like the Washington Times, the U.K. Daily Mail and the New York Daily News. Nice work.

Beyond the self-defeating aspect of the arrest, however, is how it focused attention on the disproportionate use of force in lockdown enforcement. This was a wretchedly ugly moment that could only be cheered on by the kind of people who believe that, by singling out a single protester on a beach, what they’re doing is right and good.

In a much different way, this is what resonated about the story of Shelley Luther, the Dallas salon owner who opened her shop before the state had given the go-ahead.

Appearing before the judge, Luther was told she could avoid jail if she were to “acknowledge that your own actions were selfish, putting your own interest ahead of those in the community in which you live.”

Instead of doing that, she said that feeding her kids or keeping her employees paid wasn’t selfish. She went to jail for it — and became a folk hero in the process.

No, this isn’t quite that. It’s still a potent example of why people chafe at the enforcement of lockdown orders. This was hardly what most people thought they were signing on for at the beginning of the process.

So, in short: If you’re a police officer in Miami Beach, I know people breaking the law is hardly an ideal situation, but neither is the maintenance of overly broad lockdown orders which, at least in the case of the closing of beaches, have outlived their purpose. Using four officers to arrest someone with a sign that says “We Are Free” is a rejoinder which, in return, forcefully tells everyone: “No, You’re Not.” That’s no way to maintain order and respect for the law, lockdown or no lockdown.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com