“Shifty Schiff, Nine Inches Around the Neck – World’s Smallest Collar – Should be in Jail!” – President Trump Unloads on Liar Adam Schiff following Document Release

On Friday afternoon Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) asked President Trump about the non-stop lies of the left and the documents released on Thursday on the attempted coup by the Obama deep state.

Trump unloaded on serial liar Adam Schiff.

President Trump: A lot of bad things went on. All we can do is keep winning and if we keep winning eventually they’re going to come around one way or another. It may not be from them because I’m not sure you can do it with them. Tremendous dishonesty from Schiff and from others. And they know… These are not stupid people. They know it was a hoax. They know better than anyone in this room it was a hoax. They set it up. They’re not aggrieved. I watched Schiff, shifty Schiff. Nine inches around the neck. And I watch this guy, uses the world’s smallest collar. But I watched him, I guess this morning talking about. He acts so aggrieved. So aggrieved. He knows it was a… He got caught! And not only caught, if he weren’t in the halls of Congress he’d be in jail because he made up phony stories and phony speeches and everything was phony.

President Trump is right.
Documents released on Thursday prove Adam Schiff and several Obama Democrats lied for years about Trump-Russia collusion.
And they all knew it was a lie.

The post “Shifty Schiff, Nine Inches Around the Neck – World’s Smallest Collar – Should be in Jail!” – President Trump Unloads on Liar Adam Schiff following Document Release appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Senator Ted Cruz Gets His Hair Cut at Shelley Luther’s Salon in Dallas (VIDEO)

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Friday flew from Houston to Dallas to get his hair cut at Shelley Luther’s salon after her release from jail.

Texas salon owner Shelley Luther broke the state quarantine in late April to save her business and feed her children.

Shelley was later served a citation from the city of Dallas the following morning for breaking state stay-at-home policies.

At a rally that day SHE RIPPED IT UP during her speech!

On Tuesday Shelley Luther was sentenced to 7 days in jail and a $7,000 fine.

Shelley refused to apologize to the liberal judge for opening her business.

On Thursday Governor Greg Abbott announced changes to his stay-at-home orders to prevent more mothers from being jailed for opening their businesses in order to feed their children.

Shelley Luther’s Salon a La Mode is open for business and she proudly served Senator Cruz!

WATCH:

Ted Cruz blasted the far left radical judge who sentenced Shelley Luther to 7 days in jail for the ‘crime’ of working to feed her children.

Cruz said he was disgusted by the judge and reminded Americans they should never ever apologize to elected officials.

WATCH:

A GoFundMe for Shelley Luther raised over $500,000!

The post Senator Ted Cruz Gets His Hair Cut at Shelley Luther’s Salon in Dallas (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Twitter Defends China After State Department Identifies Coronavirus Propaganda Network

Twitter Defends China After State Department Identifies Coronavirus Propaganda Network

Twitter is refuting claims from the US State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), which found that it was "highly probable" that the Chinese government is behind networks of Twitter accounts spewing disinformation related to COVID-19.

Illustration: Soohee Cho/The Intercept, Getty Images

GEC head Lea Gabrielle said that the US "has uncovered a new network of inauthentic Twitter accounts, which we assess were created with the intent to amplify Chinese propaganda and disinformation," according to CNN.

After reviewing 5,000 of 250,000 accounts flagged by the State Department, however, Twitter said the accounts belong to government entities, nongovernmental organizations, and journalists – which, we would point out, are frequent mouthpieces for the Chinese Communist Party.

Twitter – which went on a Russian account-killing spree following pressure from congressional Democrats during the Mueller investigation – doesn’t see it that way.

Yet in March, an extensive investigation by ProPublica  found that China has built a massive Twitter propaganda network and is using it to influence the coronavirus narrative.

Since August 2019, ProPublica has tracked more than 10,000 suspected fake Twitter accounts involved in a coordinated influence campaign with ties to the Chinese government. Among those are the hacked accounts of users from around the world that now post propaganda and disinformation about the coronavirus outbreak, the Hong Kong protests and other topics of state interest.

Our examination of an interlocking group of accounts within our data linked the effort to OneSight (Beijing) Technology Ltd., a Beijing-based internet marketing company. OneSight, records show, held a contract to boost the Twitter following of China News Service, the country’s second-largest state-owned news agency.

Others accounts we found have taken a darker turn in response to the pandemic, using it as a vehicle for disinformation and attacks on Beijing’s usual political opponents.

We will completely wipe out the belligerent rioters, just like the coronavirus!” declared a user who called herself Melinda Butler. Her post slammed Joshua Wong, a leader of the Hong Kong protests who spoke out in support of a medical workers’ strike in early February. Another post by Butler called on the Hong Kong Hospital Authority to “clean out” the striking “black medical workers,” alongside a graphic accusing protestors of wanting a “color revolution” in Hong Kong. –ProPublica

CCP-linked Twitter propaganda uncovered by ProPublica

According to the report, "the GEC provided Twitter with a small sample of the overall dataset that included nearly 250,000 accounts," adding that it "was not surprising that there are authentic accounts in any sample."

"Our overall analysis is based on a confluence of factors that drive our assessment, which we stand by."

The GEC’s latest assertions come as China has faced serious criticism over its handling of the outbreak which originated in country. The State Department has led an aggressive campaign aimed at calling out Beijing for a lack of transparency and pushing disinformation.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has repeatedly accused China of withholding key information about the virus, particularly in its early stages, and has claimed without public evidence that it may have escaped from a lab in Wuhan.

"It is critical that like-minded countries and free societies call out Beijing’s use of disinformation and propaganda during this crisis to prevent these behaviors becoming the norm for Beijing," Gabrielle told CNN. –CNN

Of course, Twitter also ignored the GEC when they claimed in February that Russian accounts were spreading coronavirus disinformation.

"We welcome the opportunity to collaborate with the government agencies and build on our joint efforts to address a shared threat. Twitter will continue its zero-tolerance approach to platform manipulation and any other attempts to undermine the integrity of our service," said Twitter on Friday. "When we identify information operation campaigns that we can reliably attribute to state-backed activity — either domestic or foreign-led — we disclose them to the public."

According to the report, the GEC determined the accounts were linked to Chinese state-run propaganda due to their "characteristics, content and behavior," noting that they examine whether the "accounts are being created during and doing most of their activity during Beijing business hours."

"We also assess that this is a coordinated and interconnected effort. Nearly every diplomatic account shares at least one follower with every other account, with some instances of diplomatic accounts sharing more than 1,000 followers," added Gabrielle – who also said that "a significant portion of these ‘follower accounts’ are newly created – and align with China’s push to convince various global audiences of their global leadership."

"Additionally, these accounts are pushing pro-CCP (Chinese Communist Party) narratives – praising China’s fight against the virus, claims that China promptly reported the outbreak to WHO, and accusations the Western media of providing bad coverage of China."

Twitter fired back, saying that some of the accounts provided by the State Department actually criticized the CCP.

Perhaps their accounts will be banned?


Tyler Durden

Fri, 05/08/2020 – 19:05

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

Documents: Obama Knew Details of Michael Flynn’s Call with Russian Ambassador

Then-President Barack Obama was intimately aware of the details of December 2016 intercepted phone calls between President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, and then-Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak, according to court documents released Thursday.

The former president’s knowledge and role in his administration’s investigations of the Trump campaign have long been an open question. The revelation puts the former president right in the center of the last administration’s efforts to investigate and target Flynn, whom the Justice Department just dropped their case against on Thursday. Obama had appointed Flynn as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency but had fired him in 2014, and he had reportedly warned Trump not to hire Flynn.

The newly released documents from the government’s motion to dismiss their case against Flynn show, however, that at a January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting with then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Obama had asked Comey and Yates to “stay behind.”

Obama told them he had “learned of the information about Flynn” and his conversation with Kislyak, where they discussed sanctions his administration had levied against Russia. (A memo penned by then-National Security Adviser Susan Rice also showed that Biden stayed behind as well.)

Obama “specified he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”

“Yates had no idea what the president was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an ‘investigation.’ Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting,” the documents said.

“It was not clear to Yates from where the President first received the information. Yates did not recall Comey’s response to the President’s question about how to treat Flynn. She was so surprised by the information she was hearing that she was having a hard time processing it and listening to the conversation at the same time,” the documents said:

The documents also showed how the Obama FBI justified an investigation into Flynn beginning August 2016, just a few months before the election. The reasons were that Flynn was “cited as an adviser to the Trump team on foreign policy issues February 2016; he has ties to various state-affiliated entities of the Russian Federation, as reported by open-source information; and he traveled to Russia in December 2015, as reported by open-source information.”

The FBI’s Washington office was prepared to close that investigation due to not finding “derogatory” information, but then-FBI agent Peter Strzok pushed to keep the investigation open.

Strzok and another agent interviewed Flynn at the White House on January 24, 2017, to ask him about his phone calls with Kislyak. Recently released notes from the DOJ showed agents discussing whether their goal during that interview was to get him to admit violating the Logan Act or to get him to lie so that he could be prosecuted or fired. The FBI already had transcripts of Flynn’s call, raising questions about if the FBI was simply trying to catch him in a perjury trap.

A handwritten note, presumably from then-head of FBI counterintelligence Bill Priestap, said, “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?”

According to an interview summary by Strzok and the other agent, they did not detect that Flynn was lying or believed he was lying. However, later, special counsel Robert Mueller would charge him with one count of lying to federal prosecutors, and Flynn pleaded guilty as part of a plea deal. Flynn later requested to withdraw that guilty plea, citing pressure from prosecutors.

On Thursday, the DOJ moved to drop the case against Flynn, concluding that an FBI interview of Flynn related to his calls with Kislyak that led to one charge of lying to federal investigators was “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”

Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter or on Facebook.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

How Tiny Estonia Became an Outsized Partner for Economic Freedom

Estonia is a shining example of why
freedom matters.

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, this
tiny northern Baltic country that shares a border with Russia has made huge
progress in implementing democracy and economic freedom and in developing a
strong national defense.

Estonia has aligned itself with the West—particularly the United States—and since has dramatically demonstrated the power of liberty and democratic values.

Estonians have fought often for freedom
throughout their history. They won the battle against communism and decisively
rejected socialism. Since they regained their sovereignty in 1992, they have
taken swift and decisive policy reforms that have enhanced economic freedom.

Others delayed necessary policy
decisions and reform actions, which caused problems that might have been
avoided if those changes had occurred at the right time. But Estonia got this
right, stayed true to its commitment to freedom, and has the results to show
for it.  

In 1994, Estonia became the first
country in modern times to enact a flat tax, setting a positive example for its
neighbors, who soon enacted reforms on their own.

Regulatory modernization followed, which
allowed Estonia to set aside its socialist past and emerge as one of the freest
and most resilient economies in the world, with a transparent government and free
markets under the rule of law.

According to The Heritage Foundation’s 2020 Index of Economic Freedom, Estonia’s economic freedom score is 77.7, making its economy the 10th-freest this year, with an overall score well above the regional and world averages.

The Estonian economy has been ranked in the upper reaches of the mostly free category for nearly two decades, with solid gross domestic growth and increases in both private consumption and investment.

In addition to tax and regulatory
reform, Estonia opened its markets. It reduced tariffs and non-tariff
barriers to trade, and abolished all export restrictions, which enabled it to transition
rapidly to a functioning and efficient market economy.

Estonia’s famous e-government feature has provided a sparkling example of its commitment to open governance, and its innovative use of the internet in general has enhanced the country’s regulatory efficiency and created unique opportunities for a number of globally known high-tech enterprises, including Skype.

Its political stability and growing
economic prosperity has enabled Estonia to become a competitive and willing
ally of the United States on many key fronts.

Although small in size and population—about
three-fourths the size of West Virginia, with a population roughly equal to
Dallas—the county firmly represents something much bigger geopolitically as a
staunch defender of economic freedom and democracy, alongside the United States.

It’s working with the United States on the Three Seas Initiative, which facilitates interconnectivity through
digitalization, energy, and infrastructure projects in Central and Eastern
Europe.

The U.S. has strongly supported Three Seas since it began in 2015. President Donald Trump attended a meeting of the group in 2017, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced an American commitment of $1 billion to the Three Seas Initiative Investment Fund at the recent Munich Security Conference.

Estonia’s Three Seas Initiative Summit,
originally planned for June, has been postponed till October because of the
COVID-19 pandemic. The summit now will offer an excellent opportunity for the
U.S. and Estonia and other European partners to work together to reboot and
revitalize our economies in the post-COVID-19 era.

If the U.S. government commits to
sending a senior-level delegation to the summit, other countries will follow
suit.

Grasping and practically capitalizing
on all opportunities to further deepen the transatlantic relationship is in the
mutual interests of America and Estonia.

The two countries share fundamental
values, and Estonia, though small in size, has established itself as big in
terms of leadership in promoting democracy and economic freedom.

The post How Tiny Estonia Became an Outsized Partner for Economic Freedom appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Nurse Fires Back at White House Reporter Who Shamed Her for Not Wearing a Mask

A nurse pushed back when a reporter asked President Donald Trump Wednesday why she and several other nurses gathered in the Oval Office during a press conference were not wearing masks or social distancing.

“We’re all COVID-19-free. We were all tested,” said the nurse, identified by ABC News as American Association of Nurse Practitioners President Sophia Turner.

dailycallerlogo

The reporter had asked the president why the nurses who flanked him during the meeting were not keeping their distance.

“We are not socially distancing because we are all negative … and we wouldn’t do anything to harm our president, obviously,” the nurse said before adding that she works at a center in Louisiana and frequently gets tested.

The nurses were at the briefing to talk about the country’s supply of personal protective equipment, like masks.

The nurses said they have ample access to personal protective equipment, even after the Department of Homeland Security stated May 3 that the Chinese government lied to the World Health Organization about the significance of the pandemic to hoard personal protective equipment, among other medical supplies.

Some officials have been critical of people who do not wear face masks. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a May 4 press conference that local officials should impose a “penalty” for “disrespectful” people not wearing masks.

“And by the way, you don’t wear a mask for yourself,” an unmasked Cuomo said during the conference. “You wear a mask to protect me. I wear a mask to protect you. We owe each other a certain amount of reasonableness and respect in society, and I owe you that level of respect, that if I’m sick, I should wear a mask.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The post Nurse Fires Back at White House Reporter Who Shamed Her for Not Wearing a Mask appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Newly released material in the Flynn case implicates Obama

A newly released document indicates that Obama pushed the FBI to go after Michael Flynn. It’s not yet clear, though, if this was part of a larger plot on Obama’s part to destroy Trump’s presidency or was merely part of Obama’s vendetta against Flynn himself. It appears, too, that while Biden probably wasn’t part of masterminding the plot, he was in on it from the beginning.

Obama and Flynn had a history, for the latter had once served as Obama’s director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. In April 2014, the Obama administration forced Flynn to retire. By February 2017, Adam Kredo reported that the break had come about because Flynn opposed Obama’s disastrous Iran deal.

In August 2016, the FBI opened its investigation into General Flynn to determine whether Flynn “may wittingly or unwittingly be involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation which may constitute a federal crime or threat to the national security.” The FBI had four pathetic grounds for this extraordinarily serious charge against a man who had spent his life serving America:

Specifically, CR [Flynn] has been cited as an advisor to the Trump team on foreign policy issues February 2016; he has ties to various state-affiliated entities of the Russian Federation, as reported by open source information; and he traveled to Russia in December 2015, as reported by open source information. Additionally, CR has an active TS/SCI clearance.

When Trump won the election, Obama warned Trump not to hire Flynn. Trump ignored that warning and, instead, appointed Flynn as his incoming director of the National Security Agency. It was in this capacity that, on December 29, 2016, Flynn had a phone call with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

According to the Department of Justice’s motion to dismiss the Flynn prosecution, the FBI’s transcript of that call revealed that

Mr. Flynn’s request that Russia avoid ‘escalating’ tensions in response to U.S. sanctions in an effort to mollify geopolitical tensions was consistent with him advocating for, not against, the interests of the United States.

That is, the transcript revealed on its face that the phone call did not show Flynn engaging in treasonous behavior.

By January 4, the FBI had prepared its “Closing Communication,” detailing its decision to end the investigation into Flynn because it had no derogatory information that justified continuing to investigate him. The FBI leadership, however, worked with Peter Strzok to keep the investigation open, using the Kislyak call as an excuse – even though everyone involved knew from the transcript that the Kislyak call was as innocent as the rest of Flynn’s behavior.

And that gets us to Barack Obama’s role in all this. On January 5, 2017, a crowd that included Obama, Comey (FBI), Biden, Brennan (CIA), Clapper (DNI), Sally Yates (the acting Attorney General), and Susan Rice (NSA) gathered in the Oval Office. The main topic was Russian election interference.

After the meeting, with Biden and Rice still present, Obama asked Yates and Comey to stay behind as well. According to Yates’s just-released statement, Obama announced that he had “‘learned of the information about Flynn,’ and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions.” Obama was “seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”

While Obama did not give an explicit order about Flynn, one can almost hear him saying, “Hint, hint, hint.” Then, perhaps in the interests of plausible deniability, Obama “specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter….”

Given that Obama knew about the Flynn/Kislyak call, it’s reasonable to believe that he knew about the call’s contents. And if he knew about the contents, he also knew that Flynn had not said anything inappropriate or illegal.

Yates, who testified about this meeting, was vaguely aware that Obama and Comey were making plans to prosecute Flynn:

At that point, Yates had no idea what the President was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an “investigation.”

One week after the meeting, an illegal leak of classified information resulted in the Washington Post reporting on the call between Flynn and Kislyak. Two weeks after the meeting, on the day that Trump was inaugurated, Rice wrote her bizarre “memo to self” about the January 5 meeting in which she stated that Obama had insisted that the investigation should be done “by the book.” The recently released documents show that the book was The Deep State’s Guide To Destroying Your Political Enemies.

Four days later, Comey violated all standard protocol to sneak into the White House and have his agents blindside Flynn with the interview that led to his prosecution. 

Whether all of the above events are connected is not yet clear. What we can see, though, is a straight line from Obama firing Flynn over the Iran Deal, to Obama unsuccessfully trying to keep Flynn out of the Trump government, to Obama sending strong signals to his henchman that the Flynn-Kislyak call could be used to destroy Flynn, to Obama’s Deep State agents in fact using that call to destroy Flynn.

The old saying that “a fish rots from the head” is old for a good reason: Human nature and experience tell us that when an institution is corrupt, that corruption begins at the top and seeps downwards. Even as rank-and-file agents were still doing their jobs, upper-level management was not only breaking the law but seemed to be getting the go-ahead from Obama himself to do that.

And as we head into the 2020 election, we can’t ignore the fact that Biden was present for all of this….

A newly released document indicates that Obama pushed the FBI to go after Michael Flynn. It’s not yet clear, though, if this was part of a larger plot on Obama’s part to destroy Trump’s presidency or was merely part of Obama’s vendetta against Flynn himself. It appears, too, that while Biden probably wasn’t part of masterminding the plot, he was in on it from the beginning.

Obama and Flynn had a history, for the latter had once served as Obama’s director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. In April 2014, the Obama administration forced Flynn to retire. By February 2017, Adam Kredo reported that the break had come about because Flynn opposed Obama’s disastrous Iran deal.

In August 2016, the FBI opened its investigation into General Flynn to determine whether Flynn “may wittingly or unwittingly be involved in activity on behalf of the Russian Federation which may constitute a federal crime or threat to the national security.” The FBI had four pathetic grounds for this extraordinarily serious charge against a man who had spent his life serving America:

Specifically, CR [Flynn] has been cited as an advisor to the Trump team on foreign policy issues February 2016; he has ties to various state-affiliated entities of the Russian Federation, as reported by open source information; and he traveled to Russia in December 2015, as reported by open source information. Additionally, CR has an active TS/SCI clearance.

When Trump won the election, Obama warned Trump not to hire Flynn. Trump ignored that warning and, instead, appointed Flynn as his incoming director of the National Security Agency. It was in this capacity that, on December 29, 2016, Flynn had a phone call with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

According to the Department of Justice’s motion to dismiss the Flynn prosecution, the FBI’s transcript of that call revealed that

Mr. Flynn’s request that Russia avoid ‘escalating’ tensions in response to U.S. sanctions in an effort to mollify geopolitical tensions was consistent with him advocating for, not against, the interests of the United States.

That is, the transcript revealed on its face that the phone call did not show Flynn engaging in treasonous behavior.

By January 4, the FBI had prepared its “Closing Communication,” detailing its decision to end the investigation into Flynn because it had no derogatory information that justified continuing to investigate him. The FBI leadership, however, worked with Peter Strzok to keep the investigation open, using the Kislyak call as an excuse – even though everyone involved knew from the transcript that the Kislyak call was as innocent as the rest of Flynn’s behavior.

And that gets us to Barack Obama’s role in all this. On January 5, 2017, a crowd that included Obama, Comey (FBI), Biden, Brennan (CIA), Clapper (DNI), Sally Yates (the acting Attorney General), and Susan Rice (NSA) gathered in the Oval Office. The main topic was Russian election interference.

After the meeting, with Biden and Rice still present, Obama asked Yates and Comey to stay behind as well. According to Yates’s just-released statement, Obama announced that he had “‘learned of the information about Flynn,’ and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions.” Obama was “seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.”

While Obama did not give an explicit order about Flynn, one can almost hear him saying, “Hint, hint, hint.” Then, perhaps in the interests of plausible deniability, Obama “specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter….”

Given that Obama knew about the Flynn/Kislyak call, it’s reasonable to believe that he knew about the call’s contents. And if he knew about the contents, he also knew that Flynn had not said anything inappropriate or illegal.

Yates, who testified about this meeting, was vaguely aware that Obama and Comey were making plans to prosecute Flynn:

At that point, Yates had no idea what the President was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can’t recall if he specified there was an “investigation.”

One week after the meeting, an illegal leak of classified information resulted in the Washington Post reporting on the call between Flynn and Kislyak. Two weeks after the meeting, on the day that Trump was inaugurated, Rice wrote her bizarre “memo to self” about the January 5 meeting in which she stated that Obama had insisted that the investigation should be done “by the book.” The recently released documents show that the book was The Deep State’s Guide To Destroying Your Political Enemies.

Four days later, Comey violated all standard protocol to sneak into the White House and have his agents blindside Flynn with the interview that led to his prosecution. 

Whether all of the above events are connected is not yet clear. What we can see, though, is a straight line from Obama firing Flynn over the Iran Deal, to Obama unsuccessfully trying to keep Flynn out of the Trump government, to Obama sending strong signals to his henchman that the Flynn-Kislyak call could be used to destroy Flynn, to Obama’s Deep State agents in fact using that call to destroy Flynn.

The old saying that “a fish rots from the head” is old for a good reason: Human nature and experience tell us that when an institution is corrupt, that corruption begins at the top and seeps downwards. Even as rank-and-file agents were still doing their jobs, upper-level management was not only breaking the law but seemed to be getting the go-ahead from Obama himself to do that.

And as we head into the 2020 election, we can’t ignore the fact that Biden was present for all of this….

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Jimmy Kimmel Busted for ‘Misleading’ Video Edit to Bash Mike Pence

ABC’s Left-wing late-night host Jimmy Kimmel is getting blasted for airing a deceptively edited video implying that Vice President Mike Pence was faking his recent effort to help a health care facility. In addition to social media backlash, journalists at NBC News and Buzzfeed News called out Kimmel for putting out “misleading” and “selective” video, adding that the original C-SPAN footage disproves his claim.

Vice President Pence was seen on Thursday delivering boxes of personal protection equipment to a health care facility in Alexandria, Virginia. At the end of the version that aired on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!, the vice president is heard saying, “Well, can I carry the empty ones? Just for the camera?”

Kimmel then chimed in: “Mike Pence pretending to carry empty boxes of PPE’s into a hospital is the perfect metaphor for who he is and what he’s doing — a big box of nothing delivering another box of nothing.”

But the longer C-SPAN version of the video tells a different story than the one Kimmel was spinning. In the original footage, Pence appears to make his remark as a joke before closing a van door and leaving the empty boxes for someone else to carry.

NBC News investigative reporter Emmanuelle Saliba tweeted: “I went back to the original @cspan footage and sounds like @VP was making a joke about the empty boxes. He doesn’t carry those last boxes. He shuts the van doors and turns to speak CEO of @fedresources.”

Likewise, Buzzfeed deputy director of breaking news David Mack noted that Kimmel’s version of the video omits crucial context.

“The clip cuts out at a selective point. When you watch the CSPAN footage (9 min in), Pence makes the crack about carrying the empty ones and the guy says “Absolutely. They’re a lot easier!” Pence laughs then immediately shuts the van door.

Kimmel’s deceptively edited video went viral after it aired late Thursday thanks in large part to a tweet by a pollster named Matt McDermott who wrote, “Mike Pence caught on hot mic delivering empty boxes of PPE for a PR stunt.”

McDermott works for the polling and political advisory firm Whitman Insight Strategies, which has close ties to Democrat candidates. He is also on the campaign board for the LGBTQ Victory Fund, a PAC dedicated to electing gay public officials.

In the past, McDermott has used his Twitter account to accuse Vice President Pence and his wife, Karen Pence, of homophobia and bigotry toward gays.

Still, the political and Hollywood left fell for Kimmel’s deception and attacked Pence.

Jimmy Kimmel has often used his perch at Disney-owned ABC to mock President Trump as well as member of his administration and family. At press time, the ABC funnyman had not commented on his doctored video or the backlash it caused.

Follow David Ng on Twitter @HeyItsDavidNg. Have a tip? Contact me at dng@breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com