PA Judge Makes Major Decision That Halts Vote Certification

A Pennsylvania judge has ordered the state to temporarily stop any actions to certify its 2020 election results until Friday when the appellate court holds a hearing on a lawsuit seeking to void millions of potentially unconstitutional mail-in ballots. Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough entered a preliminary order Wednesday granting an evidentiary hearing on a…

The post PA Judge Makes Major Decision That Halts Vote Certification appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Second Amendment Under Threat After New Third Circuit Decision

Second Amendment Under Threat After New Third Circuit Decision

Tyler Durden

Wed, 11/25/2020 – 15:55

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

The Third Circuit has issued an opinion that has received little attention over the right to bear arms, but it should. The decision in Folajtar v. The Attorney General of the United States may be one of the most perfectly tailored case for major Supreme Court decision. Indeed, the only thing lacking from the 2-1 decision is a mailing label directly to Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

In ruling that a non-violent tax conviction can result in the denial of gun ownership, the panel presents a clean case to further define the contours of the individual rights recognized in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).

The Third Circuit case concerns Lisa Folajtar who was denied the right to own a firearm. The reason was her pleading guilty in 2011 to willfully making a materially false statement on her tax returns. The plea led to a sentence of three-years’ probation, including three months of home confinement, a $10,000 fine, and a $100 assessment. She also paid the IRS over $250,000 in back taxes, penalties, and interest.

The case falls into the still grey area around the individual right articulated in 2008. The Supreme Court  recognized that this is not an “unlimited” right under the Constitution while affirming the right of “law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home.” Id. at 635. Moreover, the Court ruled two years later that Heller “did not cast doubt on such longstanding regulatory measures as ‘prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons.’” McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 786 (2010) (quoting Heller, 554 U.S. at 626–27).

The question is whether this means any and all felons, even those never accused of violent acts.  The law at issue is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Originally, in 1938, the Congress prohibited only gun ownership to those who were convicted of “crimes of violence.” See Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-351, tit. IV, § 925, 82 Stat. 197, 233–34; id. at tit. VII § 1202, 82 Stat. at 236 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)). That limited the denial of gun ownership to those convicted of murder, manslaughter, rape, mayhem, kidnapping, burglary, housebreaking and various types of aggravated assault. See Federal Firearms Act, ch. 850, § 1(6), 52 Stat. 1250, 1250 (1938).

That changed in the 1960s when Congress expanded the bar on gun ownership. That however was long before the Heller decision recognized gun ownership as an individual constitutional right.

Judge Thomas Ambro wrote the majority opinion with the support of Judge Cheryl Ann Krause.  Judge Stephanos Bibas dissented. Ambro was appointed by President Bill Clinton and Krause by President Barack Obama.  Bibas was appointed by President Donald Trump.

The majority viewed this determination as appropriately within the discretion of Congress and notes that other core rights can be lost by a felony conviction:

“Indeed, we defer to the legislature’s determination that individuals convicted of felonies may forfeit other fundamental rights, such as the right to vote and to sit on a jury, the former being the essence of our democracy. See 28 U.S.C. § 1865(b)(5); Richardson, 418 U.S. at 56; see also Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964) (“The right to vote . . . is of the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative government.”). As felons are rarely protected by the Second Amendment, Congress is also normally entitled to require disarmament as a result of a felony conviction without engaging in an evaluation of each felon’s rehabilitation and likelihood to engage in further criminal activity of any kind. See Medina, 913 F.3d at 160–61. Accordingly, Congress has the flexibility to decide which crimes are captured by § 922.”

Judge Bibas however rejected the “near categorial” rule as a misapplication of prior rulings like Heller. He also faulted the sweeping analysis that brushed over the fact that this is a nonviolent offense and that there is no evidence of dangerousness.

“The majority’s extreme deference gives legislatures unreviewable power to manipulate the Second Amendment by choosing a label. “Unvirtuousness” based on the felony label is a mushy standard that sets no limit. We must not reflexively defer to that label when a fundamental right is at stake, but rather require narrow tailoring to public safety. Felons are more than the wrongs they have done. They are people and citizens who are part of “We the People of the United States.” U.S. Const. pmbl. So they too share in the Second Amendment “right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” subject only to the historical limits on that right. Although Lisa Folajtar was convicted of tax fraud nine years ago, she is not dangerous. Neither the majority nor the Government suggests otherwise. Because she poses no danger to anyone, I respectfully dissent.”

So what now? It is hard to ignore the analogy to one of now Justice Barrett’s prior decisions as an appellate judge in Kanter v. Barr. Rickey Kanter was convicted of one count of felony mail fraud for defrauding Medicare in connection with therapeutic shoe inserts. The Seventh Circuit panel split 2-1 with Barrett in dissent. Focusing on the “history and tradition” of such restrictions, Barrett also took on the voting rights and jury service point with a key distinction:

“The problem with this argument is that virtue exclusions are associated with civic rights—individual rights that “require[ ] citizens to act in a collective manner for distinctly public purposes.” See Saul Cornell, A New Paradigm for the Second Amendment , 22 LAW & HIST. REV. 161, 165 (2004). For example, the right to vote is held by individuals, but they do not exercise it solely for their own sake; rather, they cast votes as part of the collective enterprise of self-governance. Similarly, individuals do not serve on juries for their own sake, but as part of the collective enterprise of administering justice…

Heller , however, expressly rejects the argument that the Second Amendment protects a purely civic right. Moore v. Madigan , 702 F.3d 933, 935 (7th Cir. 2012). It squarely holds that “the Second Amendment confer[s] an individual right to keep and bear arms,” Heller , 554 U.S. at 595, 128 S.Ct. 2783 (emphasis added), and it emphasizes that the Second Amendment is rooted in the individual’s right to defend himself—not in his right to serve in a well-regulated militia, id. at 582–86, 128 S.Ct. 2783.”

That is why the Third Circuit case could be so important. It is Kanter revisited but Barrett is now a justice, not just a judge.  Her view is also shared by new colleagues like Justice Brett Kavanaugh in his own dissent as a judge on the D.C. Circuit when a panel upheld the ban on semi-automatic rifles and the possession of magazines with more than 10 rounds of ammunition (as well as certain registration requirements).

If Barrett and Kavanaugh can get two other justices to accept certiorari, this could be a decision that approaches Heller itself in constitutional importance.

Assuming that you accept that this is an individual right, I have serious reservations with the sweeping analysis of the Third Circuit.  The panel imposed little burden on Congress to extinguish an individual right other than its own categorical declaration. While no right is absolute, most of us would be outraged if such a low burden was imposed on other individual rights under Constitution.  There is a good-faith debate over whether this is an individual right, but the question raised by this case is whether, as an individual right, it can so easily be set aside — particularly under a law that preceded the Heller decision.  Two justices are likely clearing their desks in anticipation of the arrival of this case from the Third Circuit.

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

Judge orders Pennsylvania halt certification of election results as fight over mail-in ballots continues

A Pennsylvania judge has ordered state officials to stop any further action in the certification of election results in the Keystone State until her court is able to hold an evidentiary hearing scheduled on Friday.

Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough, issued the injunction order on Wednesday in response to an emergency request made by Republican lawmakers and candidates who claim that a state law allowing no-excuse absentee voting violated the state constitution.

"To the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results of the 2020 General Election for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States of America, respondents are preliminarily enjoined from doing so, pending an evidentiary hearing to be held on Friday," McCullough wrote in the injunction order. "Respondents are preliminarily enjoined from certifying the remaining results of the election, pending the evidentiary hearing."

McCullough is the presiding judge over a lawsuit brought by Republican lawmakers and candidates against the state, its general assembly, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf, and Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.

The plaintiffs in the case allege that the statute in question, Act 77, "is the most expansive and fundamental change to the Pennsylvania voting code, implemented illegally, to date." They argue that in order for absentee voting to be expanded, a constitutional amendment is required, not just the passage of legislation.

"As with prior historical attempts to illegally expand mail-in voting by statute, which have been struck down going as far back as the Military Absentee Ballot Act of 1839, Act 77 is another illegal attempt to override the limitations on absentee voting prescribed in the Pennsylvania Constitution, without first following the necessary procedure to amend the constitution to allow for the expansion," the lawsuit reads.

The plaintiffs filed the emergency request after they say state officials announced the certification of presidential election results prematurely. The state certified election results on Tuesday. In 2016, Pennsylvania certified the presidential election on Dec. 12, the Epoch Times noted.

Democratic Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro immediately responded to the news, vowing to appeal the order with the state Supreme Court.

This order does not impact yesterday’s appointment of electors. We will be filing an appeal with the Pennsylvania S… https://t.co/2KHTSdmcIY

— AG Josh Shapiro (@AG Josh Shapiro)1606325861.0

News of the order broke as state lawmakers conducted a public hearing on "election issues and irregularities" in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Members of President Trump’s legal team were present at the hearing.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

HUGE! PA Lawmaker: Democrat Governor Wolf MANDATED Dominion Voting Systems — It was NOT Voted on by Lawmakers

The GOP hearing today in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania spells doom for the Democrats.

They tried to steal a 700,000 vote Trump lead.
They were careless and got caught.

We need to see jail time for these criminals who stole our rights as Americans!

A Pennsylvania lawmaker today testified that the legislature DID NOT vote for Dominion voting systems.
Governor Tom Wolf MANDATED the controversial voting systems.

This is big news!

Wolf also removed barcodes from ballots.

The post HUGE! PA Lawmaker: Democrat Governor Wolf MANDATED Dominion Voting Systems — It was NOT Voted on by Lawmakers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

“Baggies of USBs” – PA Witness Gives Explosive Testimony: I Personally Observed USB Cards Being Uploaded to Voting Machines – Now ’47 USB Cards are Missing, Nowhere to be Found’ (VIDEO)

The Pennsylvania state legislature on Wednesday held a hearing on the 2020 election issues and irregularities.

One very credible witness described how he personally observed dozens of USB cards being uploaded to voting machines which resulted in 50,000 votes for Joe Biden in a short period of time.

The witness introduced himself: “My name is Gregory Strenstrom, I am from Delaware county, former Commanding Officer in the Navy, veteran of foreign wars, CEO of my own private company, a data scientist & forensic computer scientist & an expert in security and fraud.”

“I was told that every election they leave a couple of USBs in the voting machines…after talking to law enforcement I found out that was not the case, that more than two [USBs] is unusual — so, they denied they did it but as of today, 47 USB cards are missing and they’re no where to be found…so I was told personally that these cards that were uploaded…they didn’t update the vote live in real time,” Strenstrom said.

He continued, “They only uploaded about once every 2 or 3 hours. I demanded they updated the vote so I could see what the result was and it was 50,000 votes — and as a computer scientist, an American and a patriot it doesn’t matter who those 50,000 votes were — I’ll tell you they were for Biden but what was shocking to me as an American and someone who has gone to sea, gone to war that could even happen.”

WATCH:

Strenstrom said, “In all cases the chain of custody was broken.”

“It was broken for the mail in ballots, the drop box ballots, the election day USB card flash drives, in all cases they didn’t follow any of the procedures defined by the Board of Delaware County of Elections,” he said.

WATCH:

Mr. Strenstrom told the panel that he witnessed a man who was “not a part of the process” walk into the vote tabulation center with “baggies of USBs.”

“I personally observed USB cards being uploaded to voting machines by the voting machine warehouse supervisor on multiple occasions. I saw this personally. I brought it to the attention of the deputy sheriff who was there stationed as a senior law enforcement officer and I brought it to the attention of the clerk of elections — I objected,” he said.

“I said this person is not being observed, he’s not a part of the process that I can see, and he is walking in with baggies which we have pictures of and we have submitted with our affidavits
and he was sticking these USBs into the machines. I personally witnessed that happen over 24 times – we have other witnesses that saw it including Democrat poll watchers.”

WATCH:

The post “Baggies of USBs” – PA Witness Gives Explosive Testimony: I Personally Observed USB Cards Being Uploaded to Voting Machines – Now ’47 USB Cards are Missing, Nowhere to be Found’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Tucker Blasts Liberal Media for ‘Rigging’ the Election as ‘Single Most Dishonest Thing…Ever’ in Politics

Leading off his eponymous Fox News Channel show on Tuesday, host Tucker Carlson analyzed the 2020 election results with two basic questions that, thanks to the liberal media (and as borne out in our new MRC poll), went unanswered: “What does Joe Biden believe? What are his plans for our country?”
Carlson stated that, unfortunately, “we still don’t know the answers to those most basic questions” as “Joe Biden made it through an entire presidential campaign, most of the year, without telling us” thanks to “a partisan press corps let[ting] him get away with it.”
 
 
Speaking about the media, he called the cover-up “may be the single most dishonest thing that has ever happened in American politics.”
“If you’re looking for election rigging, there you go. Tens of millions of people voted for a candidate who wasn’t real. They voted for a ghost with a whitened smile. They had no idea who this man was. They had no idea who they were voting for, or what he might do if he got elected. But at the urging of the media, they voted for him anyway. And so now the rest of us get to find out what they voted for,” he added.
Pivoting to what’s evident in terms of what a Biden administration will look like, Carlson diagnosed it as “a lot like the HR department at a large left-wing multinational, heaps of woke authoritarian social policy mixed with a corporatist economic agenda, so the rest of us will get stern lectures about our moral failings – those never end – while a small group of highly connected people will get even richer.”
Specifically, he said it would be akin to “Jeff Bezos and the Google guys [taking] over the entire U.S. government” even though “effectively they [already] have.”
The FNC host went through a number of examples from his early hires, including incoming Deputy Chief of Staff Steve Ricchetti having been a corporate lobbyist and supporter of the economically-crippling decision by the Clinton administration to have China join the World Trade Organization (click “expand”):
Steve Ricchetti is the archetype for the new Biden aides. He’s now one of Joe Biden’s closest advisers. Ricchetti has spent years as a lobbyist. He is representing companies like General Motors, AT&T, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Nextel, Novartis, Pfizer – all the big – all the big pharma companies. Ricchetti is one of the people who helped lead the alignment of Big Business squarely behind the Joe Biden for president campaign, and he was the perfect man to do it because he shares their goals and their worldview, particularly on the question, the central question of China.
Twenty years ago, Steve Ricchetti was the Deputy Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton and in that role, he helped lead the effort to allow China into the World Trade Organization. That turned out to be not a small thing at all. His lobbying worked. The result, in the end, it was one of the greatest disasters ever to befall this country in peacetime. One study by the Economic Policy Institute – and there are others – but this one found that thanks to that decision to let China into the WTO, the United States lost nearly three and a half million good-paying jobs, and the effects of that have rippled through the generations. If you’re wondering why there’s a fentanyl epidemic in Middle America, if you’re wondering why the life expectancy for American born, middle class Americans is in decline, that’s a big part of the reason. Millions of men lost their jobs, and an entire society collapsed. If you live inward from the coasts, you’ve seen it firsthand. Steve Ricchetti was one of the people behind it, not the only one, but one of the key people. He wasn’t punished for it. In fact, he’s been promoted. Joe Biden wants more of it. Biden also wants less dissent from the population. Biden knows what we all know, which is that an armed society is an independent society.
After highlighting the pro-gun confiscation views of Jennifer O’Malley Dillion and Congressman Cedric Richmond (D-LA), Carlson turned to DHS Secretary designate Alejandro Mayorkas’s hope of using the agency charged with keeping the country safe “to radically increase the amount of immigration from the Third World into America, because America doesn’t have enough going on right now” and expand DACA.
Carlson also tore into longtime Democratic hand and former CNN global affairs analyst Tony Blinken as Biden’s pick to lead the State Department (click “expand”):
CARLSON: How about foreign policy? Well, Joe Biden says he is nominating a man called Anthony [sic] Blinken – Tony Blinken to be Secretary of State, the head of our foreign policy. Blinken is the co-founder of a so-called strategic consulting group known as Westech Advisors. We know that Westech has represented Silicon Valley firms and pharma companies, but because technically, it’s not a lobbying operation, we don’t know that much more. Westech is not legally required to disclose where they are getting their money. We do believe Eric Schmidt of Google, at least reportedly was a client of Westech and that tells you a lot. Blinken himself has written op-eds for The New York Times. He’s been a global affairs analyst at CNN and that tells you a lot. Like everyone else on that channel, Blinken fell hard for the ludicrous Russia collusion line. Watch.
TONY BLINKEN [on CNN’s At This Hour, 12/18/17]: Every time the President tears down the FBI or Mueller or any of our institutions, he is actually doing Mr. Putin’s bidding. It’s exactly what Putin was trying to do in our elections that is sow doubt about the credibility and legitimacy of our institutions. The President’s ongoing collusion with Russia’s plans is really striking, intentional or not.
CARLSON: So, when you criticize the FBI, that’s not your First Amendment right as an American. No, you’re, "doing Mr. Putin’s bidding." It’s all part of, "The President’s ongoing collusion with Russia." Now, Tony Blinken is the best we produce. There’s not a credential that he doesn’t have. He went to Harvard, unlike you. But as with so many people with those credentials, he’s not a genius and you can tell that by his position on the invasion of Iraq. Here was Blinken during the Obama administration, celebrating our occupation of that country like it’s been a roaring success.
BLINKEN [on 03/16/12]: The wisdom of going to war in Iraq is something that is going to be debated for years, and I’ll leave that debate to the historians. But what’s beyond debate and what news coverage of Iraq in my judgment, too often fails to acknowledge is that Iraq today is less violent, more democratic, and more prosperous, and the United States more deeply engaged there than at any time in recent history.
CARLSON: Yeah, Iraq is in great shape. Good point, Tony Blinken. You seem like a pretty smart guy. You should be Secretary of State.
Summarizing what he had outlined, Carlson concluded with a reminder about the like-minded penchant for control of the people between Big Business and the left:
And above all, and this is the defining characteristic so far, more corporate control over our lives. This is the point. This is the theme. Let’s hope we’re wrong. But as of tonight, it looks like this is what we’re staring down. If you believe the federal government is powerful now, in some cases too powerful, wait until it fully aligns with Big Business. That appears to be happening. The question is, how many people knew they were voting for that when they voted for this guy? Probably not too many.
To see the relevant FNC transcript from November 24, click “expand.”
FNC’s Tucker Carlson Tonight
November 24, 2020
8:00 p.m. Eastern
TUCKER CARLSON: So, here’s a question for you. What does Joe Biden believe? What are his plans for our country? Well, it’s hard to comprehend this, but the truth is, we still don’t know the answers to those most basic questions, we don’t. Somehow, Joe Biden made it through an entire presidential campaign, most of the year, without telling us. A partisan press corps let him get away with it. That may be the single most dishonest thing that has ever happened in American politics. If you’re looking for election rigging, there you go. Tens of millions of people voted for a candidate who wasn’t real. They voted for a ghost with a whitened smile. They had no idea who this man was. They had no idea who they were voting for, or what he might do if he got elected. But at the urging of the media, they voted for him anyway. And so now the rest of us get to find out what they voted for.
Joe Biden is starting to assemble his Cabinet, so we’re going to go by his choices to let us know what we can expect. And what is emerging so far, as of tonight, looks a lot like the HR department at a large left-wing multinational, heaps of woke authoritarian social policy mixed with a corporatist economic agenda, so the rest of us will get stern lectures about our moral failings – those never end – while a small group of highly connected people will get even richer. Does that sound familiar to you? If Jeff Bezos and the Google guys took over the entire U.S. government – and effectively they have – this is what it would look like. Steve Ricchetti is the archetype for the new Biden aides. He’s now one of Joe Biden’s closest advisers. Ricchetti has spent years as a lobbyist. He is representing companies like General Motors, AT&T, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Nextel, Novartis, Pfizer – all the big – all the big pharma companies. Ricchetti is one of the people who helped lead the alignment of Big Business squarely behind the Joe Biden for president campaign, and he was the perfect man to do it because he shares their goals and their worldview, particularly on the question, the central question of China. Twenty years ago, Steve Ricchetti was the Deputy Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton and in that role, he helped lead the effort to allow China into the World Trade Organization. That turned out to be not a small thing at all. His lobbying worked. The result, in the end, it was one of the greatest disasters ever to befall this country in peacetime. One study by the Economic Policy Institute – and there are others – but this one found that thanks to that decision to let China into the WTO, the United States lost nearly three and a half million good-paying jobs, and the effects of that have rippled through the generations. If you’re wondering why there’s a fentanyl epidemic in Middle America, if you’re wondering why the life expectancy for American born, middle class Americans is in decline, that’s a big part of the reason. Millions of men lost their jobs, and an entire society collapsed. If you live inward from the coasts, you’ve seen it firsthand. Steve Ricchetti was one of the people behind it, not the only one, but one of the key people. He wasn’t punished for it. In fact, he’s been promoted. Joe Biden wants more of it. Biden also wants less dissent from the population. Biden knows what we all know, which is that an armed society is an independent society. He’s not for that and that’s why he’s hired Congressman Cedric Richmond as a senior adviser. Richmond plans to disarm law-abiding Americans – not criminals – people who commit gun crimes are now being let out of jail, but law-abiding Americans, people who’ve done nothing wrong, who have tried in good faith to protect themselves and their family, they will be punished. That’s not speculation by the way, Richmond has said so on television. Here he is on CNN last year.
CONGRESSMAN CEDRIC RICHMOND (D-LA) [on CNN’s The Situation Room, 08/16/19]: It is a buyback, then I’m all for it. If it’s a mandatory buyback, I think you may run into some complications, but the thought of it does not offend me and it sounds like something I could support.
CARLSON: So, gun control didn’t play a large role in our debates coming up to the election. There was almost no discussion about issues for six months. But it’s becoming clear that preventing Americans from defending themselves and their families is a big part of the Biden agenda, and that’s part of the reason that campaign manager Jennifer O’Malley Dillon to be his Deputy Chief of Staff. At a time when a record number of Americans have purchased legal firearms to protect themselves from skyrocketing crime, Dillon has called for this confiscation of more than 10 million legally owned firearms. Again, we’re not making that up. It’s not propaganda. Here she is saying it herself.
JENNIFER O’MALLEY DILLON [in Beto campaign ad]: Put a plan that supports – we’ll see – mandatory buybacks of weapons of war. The assault weapons ban is very, very important, and we need to have it. But that only takes weapons of war off the streets in the future. It does nothing for weapons of war that are currently out there, and I think there’s 15 or 16 million.
CARLSON: "I think there’s 15 or 16 million." She doesn’t know the numbers. She doesn’t know anything. Imagine what she knows about firearms or about anything else, probably about zero. What end does the bullet come out of? She doesn’t know. But it doesn’t matter, she plans to seize them anyway. Mandatory buybacks are seizure. Taking private property by force. Not because the people who own those firearms have done anything wrong, they haven’t, Jennifer O’Malley Dillon just doesn’t think you should be allowed to have them, so what’s that going to look like? What’s it going to look like when the Biden administration tries to disarm law-abiding Americans? Apparently, we’ll find out. We do know the entire country could look very different very soon. Alejandro Mayorkas will make certain of that. Biden has chosen him to run the Department of Homeland Security. Now, the Department of Homeland Security, if you’re old enough, you will remember was created almost 20 years ago in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, and it had just one purpose, protect the country. Mayorkas has a different plan for DHS though. He plans to use the agency to radically increase the amount of immigration from the Third World into America, because America doesn’t have enough going on right now. We just don’t have enough problems, so we’re going to mix it up a little bit. In an interview a few years ago on PBS, Mayorkas called for amnesty – legal amnesty for anyone who arrived in the United States illegally under the age of 31, regardless of how old they are now. Think about that. How many people would that include? Well, probably tens of millions. Watch.
JUDY WOODRUFF [on PBS NewsHour, 09/05/17]: So what else would you look for?
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS [on PBS NewsHour, 09/05/17]: Perhaps a greater population of individuals who would qualify in terms of their age, so one of the limitations on DACA was one had to be under the age of 31 at the time of application, even though one might have been brought to the United States as a two-year-old decades ago. And so really, the determinative factor should be how old was one when one came to the United States, as opposed to how old one is now.
WOODRUFF [on PBS NewsHour, 09/05/17]: But you could see it being – you’d like to see it expanded?
MAYORKAS [on PBS NewsHour, 09/05/17]: I would.
CARLSON: Yes, I would. Guys like that and Barack Obama is a perfect example, are the opposite of Donald Trump. No matter what Trump says, he could be reading the phone book, he could be reading the lyrics to the birthday song and it always sounds rah, big, loud, jarring. But people like that, the actual radicals, people who are saying things that are completely out of the mainstream – and you can check the polling. That’s not speculation. That view is not a majority view. It’s the view of a tiny group of radicals. But people like that, say those things in the calmest tone, like it’s totally natural, of course, yes. Not a big deal. It is a big deal. If Mayorkas gets his way, this will be a different country overnight, with very different politics. And of course, different politics are the entire point. So that’s a snapshot of domestic policy as it’s shaping up under the Biden administration. How about foreign policy? Well, Joe Biden says he is nominating a man called Anthony [sic] Blinken – Tony Blinken to be Secretary of State, the head of our foreign policy. Blinken is the co-founder of a so-called strategic consulting group known as Westech Advisors. We know that Westech has represented Silicon Valley firms and pharma companies, but because technically, it’s not a lobbying operation, we don’t know that much more. Westech is not legally required to disclose where they are getting their money. We do believe Eric Schmidt of Google, at least reportedly was a client of Westech and that tells you a lot. Blinken himself has written op-eds for The New York Times. He’s been a global affairs analyst at CNN and that tells you a lot. Like everyone else on that channel, Blinken fell hard for the ludicrous Russia collusion line. Watch.
TONY BLINKEN [on CNN’s At This Hour, 12/18/17]: Every time the President tears down the FBI or Mueller or any of our institutions, he is actually doing Mr. Putin’s bidding. It’s exactly what Putin was trying to do in our elections that is sow doubt about the credibility and legitimacy of our institutions. The President’s ongoing collusion with Russia’s plans is really striking, intentional or not.
CARLSON: So, when you criticize the FBI, that’s not your First Amendment right as an American. No, you’re, "doing Mr. Putin’s bidding." It’s all part of, "The President’s ongoing collusion with Russia." Now, Tony Blinken is the best we produce. There’s not a credential that he doesn’t have. He went to Harvard, unlike you. But as with so many people with those credentials, he’s not a genius and you can tell that by his position on the invasion of Iraq. Here was Blinken during the Obama administration, celebrating our occupation of that country like it’s been a roaring success.
BLINKEN [on 03/16/12]: The wisdom of going to war in Iraq is something that is going to be debated for years, and I’ll leave that debate to the historians. But what’s beyond debate and what news coverage of Iraq in my judgment, too often fails to acknowledge is that Iraq today is less violent, more democratic, and more prosperous, and the United States more deeply engaged there than at any time in recent history.
CARLSON: Yeah, Iraq is in great shape. Good point, Tony Blinken. You seem like a pretty smart guy. You should be Secretary of State. And so, under Joe Biden, he will be. Not impressive. But what does it all add up to? It’s starting to look like the opposite, the mirror image of what Donald Trump ran on in 2016. Policies that were so popular, Trump got elected on them, despite having no background in politics whatsoever, coming completely from the outside, and rattling people a little bit and he still got elected, because those policies were popular and they remain popular. But Biden apparently is about to give us the opposite. More giveaways to our chief global rival, the government of China, more pointless wars in the Middle East that no one outside Washington supports, massive increases in illegal immigration, along with a huge drop in American wages that always is the inevitable result of that. When you flood the low-end labor pool, the price of labor goes down. That’s called supply and demand, geniuses, but they don’t care. And then, of course, the attendant chaos and instability at home, which they have stoked for months now. Fewer Americans able to defend themselves and their families in the face of that chaos, which they caused. And above all, and this is the defining characteristic so far, more corporate control over our lives. This is the point. This is the theme. Let’s hope we’re wrong. But as of tonight, it looks like this is what we’re staring down. If you believe the federal government is powerful now, in some cases too powerful, wait until it fully aligns with Big Business. That appears to be happening. The question is, how many people knew they were voting for that when they voted for this guy? Probably not too many.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Democrats, Led by Adam Schiff, Have Meltdown Over Flynn Pardon

Democrats, led by Rep. Adam Schiff (CA), erupted in anger Wednesday afternoon after President Trump pardoned his former National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (U.S. Army Ret.), bringing to an end Flynn’s nearly four year long ordeal of being targeted and prosecuted by the Obama-led Deep State for a crime he did not commit.


File screen image.

Schiff’s statement, “Donald Trump has repeatedly abused the pardon power to reward friends and protect those who covered up for him. This time he pardons Michael Flynn, who lied to hide his dealings with the Russians. It’s no surprise that Trump would go out as he came in —
Crooked to the end.”

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA): “Michael Flynn committed a felony. But since he is a friend of @realDonaldTrump, he gets special treatment no ordinary person gets, like a pardon. This is the kind of behavior that caused voters to fire @POTUS, because Trump repeatedly put himself & his elite friends over America.”

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY): “This pardon is undeserved, unprincipled, and one more stain on President Trump’s rapidly diminishing legacy.”

Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA): “Pardoning Mike Flynn, who lied to the FBI and plead guilty, is an act of extreme corruption. That we expect such underhanded behavior from Donald Trump, the most corrupt president in our history, makes it no less wrong. Donald Trump is crooked.”

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) “Michael Flynn is a criminal. Roger Stone is a criminal. Donald Trump is a criminal. None of them deserve to be pardoned.”

The post Democrats, Led by Adam Schiff, Have Meltdown Over Flynn Pardon appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Dem Mayor Warns Residents To ‘Avoid Travel’ Just Before Flying To Visit Family

The mayor of Denver, Colorado, is facing heavy criticism online after he advised his city’s residents to spend Thanksgiving alone moments before he departed on a flight to leave the state to be with his family. Denver Mayor Michael Hancock, a Democrat, took to Twitter on Wednesday to ask his city’s residents to avoid traveling…

The post Dem Mayor Warns Residents To ‘Avoid Travel’ Just Before Flying To Visit Family appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com