Amazon’s Halo Device Will Tell You If You’re Condescending, Opinionated, Or Fat

Amazon’s Halo Device Will Tell You If You’re Condescending, Opinionated, Or Fat
Tyler Durden
Thu, 12/17/2020 – 20:00

Authored by Robert Wheeler via The Organic Prepper blog,

As small businesses disappear into the black hole of “pandemic restrictions,” major international corporations devour what is left of the market. Those institutions, which Carroll Quigley referred to as future “corporate overlords,” are rolling out new technologies just in time for the “Great Reset.”

Just when you think technology couldn’t get any more invasive

There’s nothing angelic about Amazon’s new wearable technology.

Halo, Amazon’s new AI health bracelet, offers body composition analysis, tone of voice analysis, sleep & activity tracking. Presumably, this new tech is another convenient application to bring awareness to users of such things as too much body fat or if their tone is a bit too abrasive or “condescending.”

While some individuals may benefit from both of these nudges, a recent review of Halo by the Washington Post (the unabashed purveyor of the loss of civil liberties) forcibly admits that Halo is the “most invasive tech we’ve ever tested.” 

Authors Geoffrey Fowler and Heather Kelly wrote: 

Hope our tone is clear here: We don’t need this kind of criticism from a computer. The Halo collects the most intimate information we’ve seen from a consumer health gadget – and makes the absolute least use of it. This wearable is much better at helping Amazon gather data than at helping you get healthy and happy.

Incidentally, Amazon’s CEO Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.

So, we could reasonably expect the authors of this review, Fowler and Kelly, to soon have to look for other employment avenues. Either that or the review was a cleverly placed advertisement, designed to draw controversy to an app that could use some in house advertisement. And to target those readers who don’t seem to care much about their own privacy.

AI now informs people they are condescending, opinionated, and fat

Halo collects more invasive information than FitBit or Apple Watch. With no screen, sounds, vibrations, or any striking design, Halo uses sensors to monitor physical activity, sleep, skin temperature, and heart rate. The only way to read that data is through a companion phone app.

The wearable device collects new information like body photos (of a scantily clad user) and voice recordings, feeding the data into Amazon’s AI software for analysis.

Amazon says HALO requires users to be nearly naked for the complete body scan to calculate body fat percentage. This scan requires users to stand in front of their phone’s camera in their underwear for a 360-degree scan.

The shots then go to Amazon’s cloud for analysis.

Remember when people scoffed at the phrase, “Big Brother is always listening?”

This new device is. And it tells you when you are being condescending or sound opinionated. Although, supposedly, you can push a button and cut off the microphone. Temporarily…sure you can. 

The WaPo writers seemed considerably more concerned with the device’s voice analysis, focused on the fact that it is not as accurate as they would like. No mention of the frightening reality that Halo possibly represents the last vestiges of privacy and personal data. 

The Halo’s voice tone analysis is questionable on a whole other level. You train the device to recognize your voice by reading sample phrases, and then it listens out constantly for moments in conversation that go beyond your neutral tone. (There is a button you can press to temporarily turn off the microphone.) The Halo plots these moments as positive vs. negative and high vs. low energy, and then applies more nuanced descriptors to them – for example, a voice that registers as negative and low energy might be classified as “discouraged.” You can review a dozen, or more, of these per day in the Halo app.

“For the most part, people are relatively unaware of how they sound to others and the impact that may have on their personal and professional relationships,” said Amazon’s medical officer Maulik Majumudar.

Do we want another product designed to mine for personal data?

The Halo is designed to mine your data. As with all devices like this one, the privacy policy states Amazon won’t sell or share your data without your explicit permission and that you are in control of it. The writer’s of the WaPo article had this to say: 

But that still leaves open plenty of other ways for Amazon to profit from your information. In an anonymized way, it can data mine the heart rate, activity, sleep and tone patterns of Halo owners, using it to tailor its health algorithms and learn about human bodies. Make no mistake: disrupting medicine is the next goal for big tech.

Medical industries are attempting to push digestible microchips to monitor patients’ intake of medicine from afar by their doctor. Halo is just one more step in that direction. First, there were the handhelds. Now we are in the age of wearables“Ingestibles” are next in line on our way to merging man and machine.

Undoubtedly, those concerned with the direction in which humanity is heading will be labeled as Luddites and conspiracy theorists. We won’t be vindicated when we are proven right, either. It hasn’t happened any other time. One must wonder what kind of person would welcome such invasive technology.  And could THEIR wearable technology eventually invade OUR privacy? 

Override Early Access
On

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://cms.zerohedge.com/

ATF Raids Business Making 80% Lower Receivers, Seizes Customer Lists…


The ATF has officially gone rogue.

Via RGJ:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives raided a Dayton-based gun manufacturing company, Polymer80, on Dec. 10.

Polymer80 is suspected of manufacturing and selling illegal firearms, failing to properly pay taxes, shipping firearms to customers in different states and failing to conduct background checks on customers who want to purchase a firearm, according to an affidavit filed in U.S District Court by ATF Special Agent Tolliver Hart on Dec. 9.

Polymer80 sells a product called the “Buy Build Shoot” kit which includes all the necessary parts to build a functioning firearm. ATF agents purchased several kits and had them delivered to California, according to the affidavit.

These guns, which do not have a licensing serial number or manufacturer’s mark, are referred to as “ghost guns”.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

BREAKING: Georgia Conducting Statewide ‘Signature Match Review’ Of Absentee Ballots

Georgia is conducting a statewide review of signatures on absentee ballots after weeks of pressure from President Trump and his campaign. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced the statewide review in a press release on Thursday. The announcement comes after his office approved an initial signature review in one county, Cobb, on Monday. “We […]

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

SPECIAL REPORT: Big Tech Stole 2020 Election by Weaponizing Platforms

Big Tech companies, outraged at President Donald Trump’s win in 2016, put everything they had into ensuring that he would lose in 2020.
In seven key swing states, one in seven Biden voters (14 percent) said they primarily relied on sites such as Facebook or Twitter for their election news, according to a survey from the Media Research Center conducted by The Polling Company, which polled 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states. But on Twitter and Facebook, conservatives, Trump supporters, and news that damaged the Biden campaign were regularly stifled, especially in the months leading up to the 2020 election.
Campaign messages only have value when they are heard. Trump and his campaign suffered the most in the censorship melee. Before the election, Twitter and Facebook had censored them 65 times but left former Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, unscathed. Twitter was the bulk of the problem, with 98 percent of all the instances of censorship.
A bombshell New York Post report implicating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, in corrupt dealings in Ukraine was almost immediately suppressed on both Facebook and Twitter. The Post reported on “smoking-gun email[s]” that purportedly revealed “how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman” to his father, the then vice president. Polling showed that if all Biden voters had known about this story, enough would have changed their votes to swing the election to Trump. The same story that the Post was banned for is in every publication now, from The New York Times to CNN. After the election, of course.
A similar incident happened when the Post released a story showing Biden’s corrupt dealings with China. In a separate national survey, four percent of all Biden voters, had they known the story, would not have voted for Biden.
According to an analysis done by Newsweek, the suppression worked. The Post’s story only reached roughly half the audience that other viral news stories reached on Facebook. Anti-Trump stories like The New York Times story on Trump’s taxes reached roughly 5.37 million people, while the Post story only reached about 1.94 million.
The denial of facts from the liberal media left voters in the dark. Many Biden voters were not aware of the broad censorship Big Tech companies used to silence conservatives and Trump supporters.  Thirty-four percent of Biden voters were not aware that Trump had been censored by Twitter and Facebook, while Biden was not censored at all, according to the poll from The Polling Company. Fifty-two percent of Biden voters were not aware that Antifa pages were allowed on Facebook, while many conservative pages had been taken down. Sixty percent of Biden voters were not aware that Facebook and Twitter prevented users from mocking or posting satire of Biden and his campaign.
But Big Tech denies it censors conservatives every time while finding new ways to suppress, label, and remove information posted on their platforms. The liberal media insist that tech companies are not removing content, but still urge Facebook, Twitter, and Google to do more to remove ideas and opinions that go against their established narrative. From criticism of mail-in ballots to satirical posts about Biden, Big Tech took them all down. YouTube’s latest policy that will ban content that contests the 2020 election results is proof of the overwhelming direction toward censorship.
The Gaslight Strategy
The liberal media covered up the fact that Big Tech companies censored conservatives. “Republicans and right-wing media outlets have been all too happy running with the narrative that social media companies are censoring conservatives, regardless of the facts,” stated CNN Senior Media Reporter Oliver Darcy. Vox Associate Editor of Politics and Policy Aaron Rupar tweeted in 2018: “.@foxandfriends gave @GOPChairwoman a platform to tout, without any pushback, hoax stories about conservatives being ‘censored’ on Twitter.” Popular Information founder Judd Legum tweeted in 2019: “The core claim, that conservatives are being censored on social media IS TOTALLY MADE UP.” Media ignored Big Tech censorship reports, hearings in the House and Senate, and labeled censorship concerns as a “conspiracy theory.” The strategy was to make it seem as if censorship wasn’t happening.
“I doubt I would be here if it weren’t for social media, to be honest with you,” said Trump to Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo in 2017. Big Tech heard and reacted. Out of the 100 new tech policies introduced in 2020, 26 were touted as election-related. Some of these policies included Twitter’s attempt to disable simple retweeting of content; Facebook’s plan to shut down political ads after the election; and YouTube’s removal of content aimed at content that would potentially reduce voter participation.
When Microsoft CEO Bill Gates and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticized the practice of micro-targeted ads, Big Tech listened and obeyed. Google restricted micro-targeted ads a few weeks after the public outcry from Democrats.
“[T]he timing cannot be pure coincidence,” writes Senior Writer Will Oremus at tech magazine OneZero, at Medium. He explained that some of the changes Facebook has made over the past year “position Facebook to better defend itself against a potential president and party that has raised the specter of regulations that could seriously damage its business.”
Big Tech Strongly Supported Biden
Companies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter picked sides before the election and used all their power to further the win. 
Ninety percent of donations from Twitter and Facebook employees went to Democratic campaigns, according to OpenSecrets.org. Facebook contributed 91.68 percent ($2,409,464 out of $2,628,040) of its donations to Democrats collectively between individual donations ($2,400,269) and PAC donations ($234,000) equaling $200 or more. Affiliates of Alphabet, Inc., Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple donated $10,243,589 to the Biden campaign during the 2020 presidential race, according to OpenSecrets. Trump received only $427,047 from the aforementioned Big Tech companies.
When the left embraced mail-in ballots, so did Big Tech. But that meant a hasty suppression of any criticism of mail-in voting. A letter from the Biden campaign, obtained by Axios, proclaimed that Donald Trump Jr.’s public statements of concern over mail-in voting were dangerous to democracy itself. Biden specifically condemned the platform for allowing “this dangerous claptrap to be spread to millions of people.” The liberal media, including CNN and TechCrunch,  previously had warned about the dangers of mail-in ballots. “Yet votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show,” wrote The New York Times in 2012. 
Trump was fact-checked by Twitter for condemning “Mail-In Ballots” as “substantially fraudulent” in May 2020. GOP Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel called out Twitter for censoring critiques of mail-in voting earlier this year: “Twitter falsely claims there is no evidence of mail-in ballot fraud.” She added: “That’s odd since NJ’s all-mail primary this month was ‘plagued’ by fraud concerns, with 3,000 votes set aside.” The censorship seemed to come as a response to criticism from the Biden campaign.
Conclusion
Big Tech companies wield an incredible amount of power when it comes to informing and influencing their users. They knew it and abused that power to help steal a presidential election.
Google Responsible Innovation Head Jen Gennai was caught on camera by Project Veritas in 2019 saying, “We’re training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have … would the outcome be different?” Gennai bragged that Google was going to prevent “the next Trump situation.”
Forbes wrote that “72% of U.S. citizens of voting age actively use some form of social media.” More than 172 million potential voters were subject to the subtle changes online. Feeds were manipulated, conservative politicians were censored, and stories were suppressed in order to affect these voters in some way.
Both Facebook and Twitter continued to manipulate what they allowed users to see even after the election. Facebook modified its feed to restrict conservative sites and emphasize traditional news outlets who pride themselves on being against Trump.
It affected voters, according to the MRC survey: One of every six Biden voters surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one of eight key stories about either Biden and Trump. The Hunter Biden story was the strongest example out of the eight and 9.4 percent of those surveyed said that would have caused them to change their vote — if they had known about it.
Big Tech proved that they were out to influence the election by continuing to hammer Trump into the ground with censorship even after all was over. Trump and his campaign have been censored at least 486 times on Twitter, with more than 400 of those instances occurring after November 3.
If liberal Big Tech companies have so much power and influence to manipulate an election, can any election really be fair? That’s the question that both political parties, Congress and the federal government must address. Before the next election.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

SCOTUS Delivers Another Win For Places Of Worship

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court, drawing from the ruling they issued last month in favor of New York churches and synagogues against New York governor Andrew Cuomo’s pandemic restrictions in the case Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, issued an unsigned order that sided with a Colorado church in one case and a Catholic priest […]

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

While Restaurants Die Left And Right, NYC Wants To Make It Even HARDER To Terminate Workers…


Via NY Post:

Two City Council bills that seek stiff regulations to how fast-food restaurants can fire employees were blasted by the business community Tuesday as a “sucker punch” to the COVID-19-ravaged restaurant industry.

“As we rally to save our restaurants, fight to prevent another full-scale shutdown of the economy and push for a federal aid package, the New York City Council sucker punches the business community by pushing this legislation through,” Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce President Randy Peers railed at an afternoon press conference.

“This is the ultimate expression of how disconnected the City Council is from the reality the small businesses are facing today.”

The bills, which the Committee on Civil Service and Labor voted through 5-1 Tuesday, would bar fast-food establishments from firing workers without just cause and require new staff to be canned before tenured workers if layoffs are necessary.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

The 1st Over-the-Counter Rapid COVID Test Will Soon Be Available in US Stores

The first home test for COVID-19 that doesn’t require a prescription will soon be available in U.S. stores. The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday authorized the rapid test, which can be done entirely at home. Regulators granted emergency use for a similar home test last month, but that one needs a doctor’s prescription. The…

The post The 1st Over-the-Counter Rapid COVID Test Will Soon Be Available in US Stores appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

AZ GOP Chair: When 30% of Democrats Think the Election Was Stolen from Trump, You Know Something’s Wrong

The voting public needs to be confident that in our state, and in our nation, we hold free and fair elections. That is why the Arizona Republican Party is doing everything we can to ensure voters trust that a free process leads to fair results. The media pollsters this cycle were terribly wrong, about which…

The post AZ GOP Chair: When 30% of Democrats Think the Election Was Stolen from Trump, You Know Something’s Wrong appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Watch: Kayleigh McEnany Walks Into Press Briefing and Immediately Lists Media ‘Fact Checks’ That Were Wrong

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany forced the establishment media’s leftist shills to sit and eat their own words Tuesday with regard to the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine. During a media briefing, McEnany reminded the activist reporters of the ongoing logistical operation to get vaccines out to Americans. More importantly, she reminded the…

The post Watch: Kayleigh McEnany Walks Into Press Briefing and Immediately Lists Media ‘Fact Checks’ That Were Wrong appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com