EXCLUSIVE: Brilliant! America’s Online Minutemen and Women Just Uncovered the Dominion Plot Transferring Vote Ratios between Pennsylvania Precincts (VIDEO)

Trump supporters wearing red MAGA hats and patriotic attire in the front rows at the Trump 2020 kickoff rally at the Amway Center, Orlando, FL, June 18, by Kristinn Taylor

Another individual on the Internet has put together what he believes is evidence of the Dominion company transferring votes between precincts in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election in an effort to ultimately steal the election for Biden while concealing their diabolical scheme.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported on the votes for President Trump in three Pennsylvania counties dropped off at the same exact time!

More “Glitches” in Pennsylvania: Votes for Trump Drop IN THREE DIFFERENT COUNTIES SIMULTANEOUSLY — Almost As If It Was Coordinated

The brilliant minds in America are joining forces.  They are the modern day Minutemen and women of America today.  Our ancestors fired rifles and birthed a nation.  We destroy enemies of the Union both foreign and domestic through data, analysis and programming genius.

Another American patriot by the name of Edward Solomon believes he has uncovered how Joe Biden was able to steal the 2020 election.

In his video entitled: Smoking Gun: Dominion Transferring Vote Ratios between Precincts in PA, Solomon explains his thesis and provides numerous examples to support it.

In a prelude to the video Solomon shares:

In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November 4th.

In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below):
https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall data set spanning an entire week.

Original data sets:
https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6

“The Dominion System isolated a “Flip Set” from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple “ratio sets” and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular “ratio set” receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it’s trail, Dominion reassigns the same “ratio set” to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn’t keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trump an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I’m a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election).”

This analysis appears to coincide with the report from two days ago where another patriot who goes by Sean on Twitter shared his thesis and calculations showing hundreds of thousands of votes flowing from Trump and sometimes through the Third Party candidates and ultimately to Biden.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: The Steal Was MASSIVE! – Expert Reveals How Hundreds of Thousands of Trump Votes Were Shifted to Biden on Election Night!

Americans cannot be stopped.  We thirst for freedom and the truth.  Our army is strong, wide, deep, smart and powerful.

(Note that we are still reviewing this data but to date have uncovered no instances or calculations presented that indicate the information in this video is false.  If we hear anything which materially refutes this information we will provide once confirmed.)

The post EXCLUSIVE: Brilliant! America’s Online Minutemen and Women Just Uncovered the Dominion Plot Transferring Vote Ratios between Pennsylvania Precincts (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Court Protects Life, Upholds State Ban on Abortion Due to Down Syndrome

A federal appeals court ruled Friday that Tennessee can begin outlawing abortions because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome or if they’re based on the race or gender of the unborn baby. Tennessee Republican Gov. Bill Lee enacted the so-called “reason bans” earlier this year as part of a sweeping pro-life measure. The law…

The post Court Protects Life, Upholds State Ban on Abortion Due to Down Syndrome appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

‘Widespread destruction to businesses’ in Portland by violent black bloc vandals

Destructive saboteurs purposely damaged at least two dozen businesses in Portland on Friday night. The Portland Police Bureau declared that the night of civil unrest resulted in "widespread destruction to businesses in Hollywood neighborhood."

The Portland Police Bureau stated that a "group of nearly 50 people gathered" and then "vandalized many businesses including many small businesses in their path." The vandals were "dressed in all black and seen wearing helmets and carrying umbrellas."

Tonight, a separate group of nearly 50 people gathered at NE Halsey St and NE 52nd Ave before moving to NE 43rd Ave… https://t.co/G8qgD4zfNq

— Portland Police (@Portland Police)1605942662.0

Police found that the violent black bloc anarchists "vandalized and destroyed private property in both Downtown and Northeast Portland." The rioting group also vandalized the Mexican Consulate.

This evening, a group gathered outside the Mexican Consulate in Downtown Portland. The group was described as dress… https://t.co/xkED441uQL

— Portland Police (@Portland Police)1605938771.0

In videos of the destruction, you can hear glass being shattered as windows of storefronts are destroyed.

Portland still at it I guess, breaking windows on what I’m sure is corporate buildings only. https://t.co/yMH70FZjMw

— Kitty Shackleford (@Kitty Shackleford)1605937773.0

The anti-cop acronym A.C.A.B., which stands for "All Cops Are Bastards," was spray-painted on numerous stores. Banks and a Whole Foods were targeted

(Content Warning: Explicit language)

Portland building damage from the "Trans Day of Rage" (Whole Foods)(BehindEnemyLinesNews Twitch) https://t.co/RUQYmr9vrZ

— Kitty Shackleford (@Kitty Shackleford)1605939048.0

Whole Foods windows damaged on NE Sandy Blvd. #koin6news #Oregon #Portland #pdx #pnw https://t.co/XwssT8DBTa

— Jennifer Dowling (@Jennifer Dowling)1605939798.0

Windows also broken at Chase. #koin6news #pdx #pnw #Oregon #Portland https://t.co/ieWCN1cGxJ

— Jennifer Dowling (@Jennifer Dowling)1605940118.0

Portland Bank of America(BehindEnemyLinesNews Twitch: https://t.co/7KhdKsknN8) https://t.co/n7HIT0JD94

— Kitty Shackleford (@Kitty Shackleford)1605941475.0

Glass door smashed at the Wells Fargo. #koin6news #pdx #pnw #Oregon #Portland https://t.co/uoZ3hXImmG

— Jennifer Dowling (@Jennifer Dowling)1605940454.0

The vandals also spray-painted "Black Trans-Lives Matter," "Gentifiers," and sent a message to the Portland mayor by writing: "F*** Ted Wheeler."

There is a group of antifa in black bloc smashing up numerous businesses again in Portland. They announced their ga… https://t.co/WN0gNMR6sp

— Andy Ngô (@Andy Ngô)1605937908.0

Portland police officers were dispatched to the area. Despite the widespread destruction, no arrests were made.

Also on Friday night, a UPS driver was robbed at gunpoint and kidnapped in Northeast Portland. While the UPS driver was delivering packages, four suspects approached him. One pointed a gun at him and the other three duct-taped his wrists.

The thieves heisted the UPS truck and put the UPS driver in a light-colored Honda. "After a short distance, the suspects stopped, stole packages from the truck, released the driver and took off in their Honda. The driver was not hurt," as reported by KOIN-TV.

On Thursday in Portland, there were tense confrontations between Black Lives Matter militants and police.

There have been regular, near-nightly protests and riots in Portland since late May, following the death of George Floyd, who died in police custody.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

Why Dennis Quaid’s ‘Reagan’ Biopic Can’t Arrive Soon Enough

Hollywood can multitask as well as any industry.
Stars, producers and screenwriters spent the last four years castigating anyone, and anything, associated with President Donald Trump. That didn’t stop them from proselytizing about open border policies, gun control and other progressive issues. 
Showtime is no different.
The network that just released a profoundly dishonest two-part miniseries attacking President Trump is back to savage another GOP figure.
President Ronald Reagan.
The just-released docuseries The Reagans does little to hide its rage against the nation’s 40th president. Early reviews highlight the film’s critical take on his presidency and cultural impact.
 
 
The Reagans director Matt Tyrnauer previously lensed the anti-Trump documentary Where’s My Roy Cohn? Even the Showtime press materials share the project’s critical take on Reagan.
By shining a light on the truths behind the Reagan myth and critically analyzing Ronald Reagan’s quest for power, his mode of governing, the ripple effects of his economic policies and the unprecedented role Nancy Reagan played in the White House, the series redefines the Reagans a generation after they stood at the center of the national and global stage. Covering Reagan’s rise from movie star to politician and tackling his questionable record on race, the administration’s near collapse amid the Iran-Contra scandal, and inaction in the face of the HIV pandemic, THE REAGANS offers an epochal look at a recent past that has much to do with our turbulent present.
It’s hardly Hollywood’s only attempt to dismantle Reagan’s legacy.
Showtime first slammed the Reagans way back in 2003. The Reagans miniseries started out as a CBS project until Reagan defenders called out its baldly partisan attacks:
In the production Reagan appears heartless toward AIDS suffers and calls himself “the Antichrist.” His wife Nancy is portrayed as a domineering witch who controls the complacent president.
CBS brass admitted to the problem … and then shuttled the miniseries off to corporate partner, Showtime. Per an CBS statement, the project “does not present a balanced portrayal of the Reagans for CBS and its audience. Subsequent edits that we considered did not address those concerns.”
The creative industry struck again with 2013’s  Lee Daniels’ The Butler, a look at Eugene Allen’s 30-plus years of service in the White House. President Reagan, portrayed by Alan Rickman, is shown as indifferent to the plight of blacks both in America and South Africa, among other character attacks. The film also hired Jane Fonda, a woman most conservatives loathe for her ghastly Vietnam War activism, to play Nancy Reagan.
 
 
Reagan biographers quickly rose up to refute the material.
More recently, the FX series Fargo inserted President Reagan into the narrative  Cult fave Bruce Campbell took a turn playing the man affectionately known as The Gipper, but this time the portrayal was smaller, more difficult to tease out for greater meaning.
The 2017 documentary The Reagan Show removed political commentary and simply showed news footage of Reagan during his two terms in office.
Fair-minded conservative critic Kyle Smith called the project an example of “Reagan Derangement Syndrome” all the same.
It’s almost as if the directors of The Reagan Show are, like the characters in The Americans, still mired in the mid 1980s, unaware how all of this turned out. Reagan not only didn’t start a nuclear war, he achieved victory against the Soviets without firing a shot, and his SDI idea turned out not to be a pipe dream.
Perhaps the most ghastly anti-Reagan project never got off the ground due to instant, and sizable, backlash. Far-left director Adam McKay and Will Ferrell planned a wacky political comedy about a dementia-addled Reagan’s final days in the Oval Office.
The duo quickly retreated from the project once word leaked about its nature, even while McKay pretended the theme wasn’t as cruel as critics suggested. The actual script screamed otherwise.
It’s why another Reagan project is so very necessary, at the very least to add balance to the pop culture record.
 
Dennis Quaid will play the actor turned Commander in Chief in Reagan, a film biopic currently in production. Quaid joined the long-gestating movie two years ago. Recent cast additions include Mena Suvari and Kevin Dillon. They join previously announced co-stars like Jon Voight and Robert Davi.
Penelope Ann Miller is set to play Nancy Reagan.
 
 
Soul Surfer director Sean McNamara is behind the camera for “Reagan,” influenced by The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism by author Paul Kengor. Reagan producer Mark Joseph previously gave us last year’s stunning docudrama No Safe Spaces, a film that accurately predicted the current attacks on free speech.
President Reagan wasn’t perfect. No political leader is, and fair criticism is always welcome. That’s not what we’ve seen from Hollywood over the years for one of their own.
Reagan should help balance the ledger on a historic leader and his legacy.
[Cross-posted from Hollywood in Toto.] 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

BREAKING Video: Young Internet Sleuth Reveals Evidence Showing Over 23K PA Ballots Were Filled Out and Returned Before They Were Ever Mailed To Voters (and MORE)

On November 11, Petr Svab of the Epoch Times wrote about the improbability of more than 10,000 ballots being returned in the state of Pennsylvania on a date that precedes the date they were sent. The article, as one would expect, was completely ignored by the Democratic Party mainstream media.

From 100 Percent Fed Up – Here’s something else that didn’t receive any traction in the media, the investigative work of a young citizen journalist, known as “Greg On The Right,” may have provided the single biggest piece of evidence to date that Pennsylvania’s elections were anything but free and fair.

In a 3-part video series, the young man, known as “Greg on The Right,” first posted his explosive video from the PA.gov website on Tik Tok, where curiously, it was removed. Greg promptly posted his video to Twitter, where he has a little over 5.6K followers.

Here’s a screenshot of the PA.gov website:

In his first of a 3-part series of videos, Greg explains that he could only review about one-third of the data set related to the mail-in ballots on the PA.gov website.

From “Greg On The Right:”

The following information’s straight from the PA.gov website and has almost 3.1 million entries. I exported all that information into an Excel sheet, but I was cut off at about 1 million rows, so keep in mind, we’re working with one-third of the whole data set.  

So, the first thing I did was to create a column to see if any ballots were mailed out by the government the same day that they were received, filled out, through the mail, by the voter.

It turns out, about 11,000 were filled out by the voter and returned back to the government the same day the government mailed them out to the voter.

I then created a column to see if there and there were any applications that were approved by the government, mailed out by the government, received by the voter, and then filled out by the voter and mailed back to the government on the same day. And there were 8,205 cases of that.

And lastly, I created a column to see if there were any ballots that were received through the mail, filled out before they were even mailed out and received by the government. There were 7,403 cases of that. 

If anyone’s able to make sense of these numbers without saying it’s fraud, please let me know in the comments.

Watch Greg’s incredible Pennysylvania Mail-In Ballot Video Part 1.

Pennysylvania Mail-In Ballot Video Part 2 (video can be seen below images).

Greg explains: “This data comes straight from Pennsylvania.gov,” Greg explains.

On this page, we have the total amount of ballots that the Pennsylvania government sent out through the mail.

Here on the left, we have the year the voter was born, the county name that they reside in, their registered party, the congressional district, and the application type.

This page shows the amount of ballots that were mailed out by the Pennsylvania government but were never returned.

This page shows the amount of ballots that were mailed out by the government and received and filled out by the voter on the same day.

This page shows the amount of mail-in ballots that were approved, mailed out and received, and filled by the voter on the same day.

This page shows the amount that were returned and filled out by the voter before they were even mailed out!

And lastly, this page shows the amount of mail-in ballots that were returned by the voter, but never mailed out to the voter!

Pennysylvania Mail-In Ballot Video Part 3.

In this video, Greg gives viewers an up-close and easy to understand example of how in what can only be described as “impossible,” a ballot was mailed out by a voter two days before the PA government ever mailed the ballot out.

On the same day that Greg posted his videos to Twitter, he received a message from the Knox Tea Party informing him that the dataset from the November 2020 election has been removed from the PA government website. According to Greg, who spoke to 100 Percent Fed Up today, the data appears to have been moved, and the state of PA requires anyone who wants to see the data, to pay $20 for the privilege. We cannot confirm if the data on the PA.gov website has been amended since Greg first videotaped his findings or if the dataset he’s provided remains the same.

 

An article written by Petr Svab of the Epoch Times seems to back up many of the young data sleuth’s allegations, who goes by “Greg On The Right.”

From the Epoch Times– More than 20,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have impossible return dates and another more than 80,000 have return dates that raise questions, according to a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database.

Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date.

The state’s voter records are being scrutinized as President Donald Trump is challenging the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania and other states where his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, holds a tight lead. The Trump campaign is alleging that invalid ballots have been counted for Democrats and valid ballots for Republicans were thrown away.

The post BREAKING Video: Young Internet Sleuth Reveals Evidence Showing Over 23K PA Ballots Were Filled Out and Returned Before They Were Ever Mailed To Voters (and MORE) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

New York Times Job Listing Shows How Western Propaganda Operates

New York Times Job Listing Shows How Western Propaganda Operates

Tyler Durden

Sat, 11/21/2020 – 14:30

Authored by Caitlin Johnstone,

People who are only just beginning to research what’s wrong with the world often hold an assumption that mainstream news reporters are just knowingly propagandizing people all the time. That they sit around scheming up ways to deceive their audiences into supporting war, oligarchy and oppression for the benefit of their plutocratic masters.

Once you’ve learned a bit more you realize it’s not quite happening that way. Most mainstream news reporters are not really witting propagandists–those are to be found more in plutocrat-funded think tanks and other narrative management firms, and in the opaque government agencies which feed news media outlets information designed to advance their interests.

The predominant reason mainstream news reporters say things that aren’t true is because in order to be hired by mainstream news outlets, you need to jack your mind into a power-serving worldview that is not based in truth.

A recent job listing for a New York Times Russia Correspondent which was flagged by Russia-based journalist Bryan MacDonald illustrates this dynamic perfectly. The listing reads as follows:

Vladimir Putin’s Russia remains one of the biggest stories in the world.

It sends out hit squads armed with nerve agents against its enemies, most recently the opposition leader Aleksei Navalny. It has its cyber agents sow chaos and disharmony in the West to tarnish its democratic systems, while promoting its faux version of democracy. It has deployed private military contractors around the globe to secretly spread its influence. At home, its hospitals are filling up fast with Covid patients as its president hides out in his villa.

If that sounds like a place you want to cover, then we have good news: We will have an opening for a new correspondent as Andy Higgins takes over as our next Eastern Europe Bureau Chief early next year.

Does this sound like the sort of job someone with a less than hostile attitude toward the Russian government would apply to?  Is it a job listing that indicates it might welcome someone who sees mainstream Russia hysteria as cartoonish hyperbole designed to advance the longstanding geostrategic interests of western power structures against a government which has long resisted bowing to the dictates of those power structures? Someone who voices skepticism about the plotholeriddled establishment narratives of Russian election meddling and Novichokassassinations? Someone who, as Moon of Alabama notes, might point out that Putin is in fact at work in the Kremlin right now and not "hiding out" in a "villa"?

Of course not. In order to get a job at the New York Times, you need to demonstrate that you subscribe to the mainstream oligarchic imperialist worldview which forms the entirety of western mass media output. You need to demonstrate that you have been properly indoctrinated, and that you can be guided into toeing the imperial line with simple attaboys and tisk-tisks from your superiors rather than being explicitly told to knowingly lie.

Because if they did tell you to knowingly lie to the public to advance the interests of the powerful, that would be propaganda. And propaganda is what what happens in evil backwards countries like Russia.

Mainstream establishment orthodoxy is essentially a religion, as fake and power-serving as any other, and if you want to work in mainstream politics or media you need to demonstrate that you are a member of that religion. 

That’s all you’re ever seeing when you notice blue-checkmarked reporters tweeting in promotion of imperialist interests and status quo politics. They are not laboring under the delusion that they are saying anything new or insightful that a hundred other people aren’t saying at the exact same time; they are signaling. They are letting current and prospective peers and employers know, "I am a believer. I am a member of the faith." This way they are ensured the continued advancement of their careers in mainstream news media.

This is why you have labels for anyone expressing skepticism of establishment narratives like "conspiracy theorist", "useful idiot", "Russian asset" or "Assadist"; the powerful people who understand that whoever controls the narrative controls the world need labels to separate the faithful from the heathens. It means the same thing as "heretic".

The fast and easy way to get rich and famous has always been to promote the interests of the powerful. This is as true in every other sector as it is in media. For this reason, those who pour their energy into criticizing existing power structures and shining a bright light on their dynamics aren’t likely to be living in fancy mansions or going to ritzy parties any time soon, while those who do the opposite actually will. And yet when someone sets up a Substack or a Patreon account to make criticizing the powerful their life’s work, it is they who will get called money-grubbing grifters by the propagandized.

The faces you see thrust onto screens by the plutocratic media are not spouting falsehoods while being aware of their deception, any more than any preacher is knowingly lying when they say you’ll burn for eternity if you don’t accept the gospel. Most of them believe everything they are saying, because they have been propagandized into becoming good acolytes and proselytizers of the faith.

The most propagandized people on earth are those who are responsible for promulgating propaganda.

*  *  *

Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise, buying my new book Poems For Rebels or my old book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

Donald Trump Improved Standing With Latinos In 78 Of America’s 100 Majority-Hispanic Counties

Democrats and their media allies spent four years claiming President Donald Trump was a racist, yet he improved his standing with Latinos across the country. Politico’s Marc Caputo reported that Trump improved his standing with Latinos in 78 of America’s 100 Majority-Hispanic counties and did better with Latinos “in exit polls of each of the […]

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

If You’re A Gun Owner, Get A Lawyer Before You Need One

(Thank you for your support of the Gateway Pundit as we bring you occasional offers through promoted posts. We appreciate your consideration of this important message, as ordering through the links below benefits Gateway Pundit). 

If you own a gun, you may someday find yourself using it for self-defense.

If that should happen to you, the USCCA has prepared a video on why it’s important to have a lawyer on call.

In this video, lawyer Lee McMillan shares these points:

– Self-defense incidents don’t always happen during business hours. If one happens at night, you don’t want to wait until the lawyer’s office opens the next day.

– Most lawyers won’t defend a capital case without an initial deposit of $50,000.

– To defend a capital case in court will usually cost over $100,000.

Watch the video here:

Here’s a message from Tim Schmidt, president of the USCCA, which provides legal protection for people involved in self-defense incidents:

It’s every responsible gun owners worst nightmare…

You’ve just pulled the trigger in self-defense and called the authorities, but what now?

You might think the worst is over — after all you’re the good guy, right?

Unfortunately you couldn’t be more wrong…

You see, the deck’s already stacked against you as a responsibly armed American…

As a USCCA Member, you have up to $2,250,000 in up-front legal and financial protection behind you should you ever be forced to use your gun in self-defense.

The moment you activate the education, training and protection of a USCCA membership you gain access to:

  • Up to $2.25 million in Self-Defense SHIELD protection…

  • Up-Front Funding For Criminal Defense & Bail Bonds: No out-of-pocket expenses…

  • Protection For Use Of ALL Legal Weapons: Never second-guess defending your family…

  • No Annual Cap: Your Plan Benefit Limits are fully reinstated for each qualified self-defense incident…

  • Member-Only Access: Enjoy exclusive discounts and unlimited access to thousands of videos and articles in your training archive…

Protect What You’ve Earned: Join The USCCA Today…

Take care and stay safe,

Tim Schmidt
President | USCCA

P.S. – Check out one of my favorite quotes from a USCCA Member…

“I am a loyal member of USCCA because, God forbid, if a situation were to ever a raise where I needed to protect my family or a fellow American I will be covered, and helped out for doing the right thing.” — U.S. Marine Veteran Josh L., Ohio

The USCCA is MORE than a community of over 400,000 like-minded Americans — it’s the complete peace of mind you’ll get knowing that no matter what, we’ve got your back.

———-

To get peace of mind, USCCA memberships start at just $25 per month.

With your membership, you get:

– 24/7/365 Critical Response Team On Call

– Your Choice of Criminal Defense Attorney

– Up-Front Funding for Criminal Defense & Bail Bonds

– Protection for Use of All Legal Weapons

In addition to legal protection, joining the USCCA provides you:

– A subscription to Concealed Carry Magazine

– CCW Reciprocity Map With Permit Expiration Reminders

– Member-Only USCCA App Features

– Weekly updates on news, changing laws and gear reviews

– 10 Lifesaving Checklists

– And much more…

The USCCA provides three tiers of membership for every comfort level and budget:

 – Gold Membership $25/mo

 – Platinum Membership $34/mo

 – Elite Membership $42/mo

If you’re ready to join a community of pro-2A responsibly-armed Americans, click here.

The post If You’re A Gun Owner, Get A Lawyer Before You Need One appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

‘Time To Fact-Check the Fact-Checkers’: Candace Owens Suing Facebook, Alleging Defamation

Thanks to various left-wing-biased “fact checkers,” the left has established a monopoly on “truth” when it comes to social media. Well, the left’s version of the truth, anyway. Now, conservative activist and BLEXIT founder Candace Owens said she has had enough of one-sided fact checking, and she’s fighting back. In a Nov. 5 video released…

The post ‘Time To Fact-Check the Fact-Checkers’: Candace Owens Suing Facebook, Alleging Defamation appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Facebook Denies ‘Science’ – Blocks Danish Study Questioning Efficacy Of Masks 

Facebook Denies ‘Science’ – Blocks Danish Study Questioning Efficacy Of Masks 

Tyler Durden

Sat, 11/21/2020 – 14:55

On Wednesday, scientists in Demark published a "revolutionary" study that demonstrates mask-wearing does very little to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. By Friday, an Oxford University professor, citing the study in an article published on The Spectator, reported that he was flagged by Facebook for "false information" as he attempted to repost the article on the social media platform. 

Before we begin, we want to remind readers that hours after the study’s publication in Annals of Internal Medicine, titled "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearer," we asked a straightforward question of how social media companies would respond to these new developments. 

Well, that answer quickly appeared as director of the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University Carl Heneghan tweeted Friday that his article titled "Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers," citing the new study, was flagged as false information by Facebook. 

Here’s Heneghan’s tweet explaining what happened:

"Here’s what happened when I posted our latest @spectator article to Facebook – I’m aware this is happening to others – what has happened to academic freedom and freedom of speech? There is nothing in this article that is ‘false.’" 

In the article, published in The Spectator, he spoke about the new study: 

"Yesterday marked the publication of a long-delayed trial in Denmark which hopes to answer that very question. The ‘Damask-19 trial’ was conducted in the spring with over 6,000 participants, when the public were not being told to wear masks, but other public health measures were in place. Unlike other studies looking at masks, the Danmask study was a randomised controlled trial – making it the highest quality scientific evidence."

He continued:

"Around half of those in the trial received 50 disposable surgical face masks, which they were told to change after eight hours of use. After one month, the trial participants were tested using both PCR, antibody, and lateral flow tests and compared with the trial participants who did not wear a mask.

"In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small."

RT News points out Heneghan was also "under attack" by academic scholars, such as Thomas Conti of Brazil, who said the study was poorly designed – arguing that masks work.

Besides the publication of the study and Heneghan, arguing about the ineffectiveness of masks, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (a Republican) said there’s "science on both sides" of the mask debate. However, Reynolds still went ahead with imposing a new mask mandate in her state, along with other measures, as COVID-19 cases surge across the country, with the Midwest as the hardest-hit region.

"There’s science on both sides, and you know that," Reynolds said, without providing details. "If you look, you can find whatever you want to support wherever you’re at."

Most media outlets that reported on those remarks noted that the governor’s statement contradicted the official CDC guidelines. But it’s worth remembering that at one point or another, the FDA, the CDC, the Surgeon General, etc. have all suggested that masks do little to stop the spread of COVID-19. The CDC admitted that 80% of newly infected wore their masks following all restrictions.

The CDC recently released a new study purporting to show that masks protected both the wearer and the general public. Still, as the Danish researchers noted in their summary, the scientific links there actually aren’t at all well-established. The researchers even cautioned that their findings are hardly conclusive, and shouldn’t be relied upon by policymakers.

What’s clear is that Facebook moderators are not allowing for both sides of the mask debate to be heard. 

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml