Dirty Democrats Panic – Demand Congress Pass a Bill to Protect Crooked Cop Mueller From Being Fired!

Dirty Democrats Panic – Demand Congress Pass a Bill to Protect Crooked Cop Mueller From Being Fired!

The dirty Democrats are moving in to protect crooked cop Mueller who was specifically chosen to take down Trump et al under the guise of a ‘Russian collusion’ investigation. 

As The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft reported Monday morning, former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and business partner Rick Gates were ordered to surrender to federal authorities. Manafort has officially surrendered to the FBI, having entered the Bureau’s Washington, D.C. headquarters shortly after 8:00am EST. 

Mueller announced these charges because he is under such pressure to step down.  There is no reason for his investigation and Americans know it.  Mueller’s announcement is just to change the discussion and narrative in the fake news MSM.

Dirty and corrupt Democrats never recuse themselves from obvious conflicts of interest when required by law. Robert Mueller is example number one.  He should recuse himself from the fraudulent special investigation he is overseeing and then he should be disbarred, prosecuted and punished.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, the 200+ transactions listed in the indictment on pages 7 through 14 – with the exception of 4 transactions from 2014.

All of the transactions listed are from the years 2006 to 2013.

This was years before President Donald Trump announced his intentions to run for President.
This is ALL a witch hunt.

The Democrats know this investigation is a witch hunt which is why they are demanding Congress protect dirty cop Mueller!

The Washington Examiner reported the dirty Dems including Nancy Pelosi are demanding Congress pass a bill to protect Mueller from being fired!

Democrats demanded Monday that Congress approve a bill preventing the special counsel from being fired after Robert Mueller unsealed charges against three former Trump campaign officials concerning their work with or on behalf of Russian interests.

Sen. Mark R. Warner, Virginia Democrat and vice chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, said the charges against Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman and top deputy, and the guilty plea from a foreign policy advisor, are reasons to quickly protect Mr. Mueller from interference by an angry president.

“Members of Congress, Republican and Democrat, must also make clear to the president that issuing pardons to any of his associates or to himself would be unacceptable, and result in immediate, bipartisan action by Congress,” Mr. Warner said in a statement.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she still wants to see yet another investigation launched.

Meanwhile Hillary’s camp paid MILLIONS of dollars for a Russian dossier, a fraudulent document that most likely prompted a FISA warrant and ultimately led to the unmasking of Trump and his associates.

Hillary’s campaign is actually bragging about their collusion with the Russians during the 2016 presidential election.

As previously reported, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders slammed Hillary Clinton Saturday morning after her former spokesman said he’s “damn glad” Clinton’s campaign colluded with the Russians to spread disinformation about Trump.

Hillary Clinton also approved of the sale of 20% of America’s Uranium to a Russian nuclear firm that was under FBI investigation while she was Secretary of State as $145 million flowed to her Clinton Foundation.

Mueller has already proven that he is a dirty cop.  He should now recuse himself, and then be disbarred, prosecuted on numerous crimes and punished.  His scandalous investigation never had and certainly currently has no merit.   “Lock Him Up!”


As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

#NeverTrump Jeff Flake Considers Independent Run in AZ to Screw Republicans

#NeverTrump Jeff Flake Considers Independent Run in AZ to Screw Republicans

#NeverTump RINO Jeff Flake May Not Be Quite Done Yet– First he wants to ensure a Democrat Wins in Arizona

NeverTrumpers NEVER go away quietly.

RINO #NeverTrump Senator Jeff Flake announced last Tuesday he will not seek reelection in Arizona.

Jeff Flakewas down by 26 points in a PRIMARY race in Arizona and had an approval rating of 18% in his home state.

Then Tuesday he took to the Senate floor to audition for a future gig on MSNBC.

The outspoken #NeverTrumper trashed the Republican president and Republican voters in a 17 minute speech.
Of course, liberals loved it.

Now Flake may run as an independent candidate in Arizona.
So he can screw Republicans.

Via US News and World Report:

Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona has considered running for his seat as an independent and given his blessing to an outside organization to conduct polling to explore the possibility, a source familiar with his thinking tells U.S. News.

Flake announced last Tuesday he would not seek re-election to a second Senate term next year in light of his dire chances of winning a Republican primary and his frustration with the tenure of President Donald Trump. Polling showed him trailing his insurgent challenger, Kelli Ward, by double digits.

But The Centrist Project, a group created to recruit independent candidates, approached Flake about running outside the dominant two-party system during a meeting on Friday. The senator signaled he was open to the possibility and interested in what polling would show, according to the source.

A spokesperson for Flake did not respond to an inquiry. After initial publication of this story, the senator tweeted that an independent run is “not gonna happen.”


As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

The Paul Manafort Indictment: Six Takeaways

Indictments against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and business partner Richard Gates were unsealed Monday by special counsel Robert Mueller, the first charges in his investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 Presidential election. (A third, against former Trump adviser George Papadopoulos, was also unsealed.)

In the wake of the unsealing, media figures and public Democrats speculated wildly about the indictments, implying that they may point to much-proclaimed but littleevidenced collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump.

However, the Manafort indictment has little to do with any possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. It concerns Manafort and Gates’s extensive lobbying on behalf of the Ukrainian government which, the indictment alleges, involved numerous violations of federal law, including extensive money laundering. Conspicuously absent from the indictment is any mention of the 2016 campaign or President Donald Trump himself.

Read the full indictment for yourself here. Here are six takeaways from it:

1. The Indictment is Mostly Concerned With Manafort’s Foreign Lobbying

In contravention of federal law, the indictment charges, Manafort and Gates spent eight years lobbying on behalf of the Ukrainian government, then-President Victor Yanukovych (who would eventually flee to Russia), and Yanukovych’s party, the Party of Regions.

"from 2006 until 2014… MANAFORT and GATES engaged in a multi-million dollar lobbying campaign in the United States… without registering and providing the disclosures provided by law," the indictment reads.

Those lobbying activities were focused on shifting policymaker’s perspective on Yanukovych’s regime, as well as his jailing of political rival Yulia Tymoshenko.

Such lobbying activities are illegal unless (among other things) the lobbyist registers with the federal government under the terms of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires that lobbyists on behalf of foreign governments disclose for whom they are lobbying, what they are lobbying about, and how much they are paid for their lobbying.

Manafort registered as a foreign agent in June of this year. However, prior to that, he failed to disclose his lobbying activities, instead creating an elaborate scheme to obscure his lobbying from federal oversight.

2. Manafort’s Money Laundering Via Offshores Accounts

Manafort’s lobbying paid handsomely, but, because it was outside of the federal government’s purview, those payments had to be hidden from sight. Manafort and Gates dealt with this issue, the indictment alleges, by funneling money through offshore bank accounts.

Because the money was held in offshore accounts, Manafort used wire transfers to purchase property and home improvements for his homes across three different states.

"In order to use the money in the offshore nominee accounts of the MANAFORT-GATES entities without paying taxes on it, MANAFORT and GATES caused millions of dollars in wire transfers from these accounts to be made for goods, services, and real estate," the indictment reads.

In total, Manafort wired over $12 million between 2008 and 2014. Said money was not disclosed, in contravention of the Bank Secrecy Act and IRS reporting obligations.

3. The Indictment Has Nothing to Do with Manafort’s Involvement in the Trump Campaign

Manafort was hired as Trump’s campaign chairman in March of 2016; he resigned in August, after information about the foreign lobbying—for which he now faces charges—surfaced. Importantly, none of the charges that Mueller and company have brought against Manafort pertain to his time as campaign chairman, instead concerning the period between when he was hired by Yanukovych and when Yanukovych fled Ukraine in 2014.

This is well within Mueller’s purview. In the original letter appointing Mueller, Acting/Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein empowered him to investigate not only ties between the Russian government and Trump’s campaign, but also "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation." 

4. The Charges Are Not All That Surprising

Manafort’s ties to the Ukrainian government have been public knowledge for some time. Manafort’s resignation from the Trump campaign was prompted by the revelation that Yakunovych had paid him some $12.7 million in off-the-books, cash payments between 2007 and 2012.

Even earlier, in March of 2016, Tymoshenko brought suit against Manafort, among others, alleging that he had worked to target her in a revenge scheme for her impeding the business of Ukrainian gas tycoon Dmitry Firtash.

Furthermore, Mueller’s interest in Manafort has been apparent for months. Back in August, the FBI raided Manafort’s home under the auspices of a warrant issued in connection with Mueller’s investigation.

In other words, the Manafort indictment does not tell us much that we did not already know, especially about to what extent—if any—the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

5. Conspiracy Against the United States Is Not What You Probably Think It Is

Manafort faces nine charges overall: one for false statements, two for his failure to register under FARA, five for money laundering and failure to disclose his accounts, and one charge, drawing a lot of attention, of "conspiracy against the United States." Out of context, this sounds like, well, conspiracy against the United States, a charge that to the naive reader sounds a lot like "treason."

The reality is far less dramatic. "Conspiracy against the United States" is a crime whereby "two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy."

The relevant portion of this section of the U.S. Code (18 U.S.C. § 371) is about conspiring to commit an offense against an agency of the United States. The first charge against Manafort and Gates alleges that they conspired to defraud the Department of Justice and of the Treasury—specifically, by laundering money and failing to register under FARA.

In other words, the charge of conspiracy is simply because the two men worked together; another charge to stack on top of the lengthy list brought by Mueller.

6. The Papadopoulos Problem

While the Manafort indictment is concerned with activities unrelated to the Trump campaign, the other indictment unsealed may be more problematic. George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser to the campaign, was arrested in July (his indictment was only unsealed on Monday), and has since pleaded guilty to charges of lying to the FBI about his communications with a professor with ties to the Russian government.

Specifically, Papadopoulos admitted to coordinating with the professor to set up a meeting—which is not known to have happened—between Trump and Vladimir Putin, as well as being told by the professor that the Russians were in possession of emails from Hillary Clinton. (Papadopoulos had initially lied to the FBI about this relationship, which is the source of the charges.)

It is unclear as of yet what the larger significance of Papadopoulos’s indictment is. However, it may point to other untoward connections between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, or toward problems for bigger targets of Mueller’s investigation.

7. *Bonus* Paul Manafort Really Likes Fancy Rugs 

Enough to drop more than $900,000 on them.

The post The Paul Manafort Indictment: Six Takeaways appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Some anniversaries Hillary Clinton is NOT going to remind everybody about

**Written by Doug Powers

The traditional gift for a one-year anniversary is paper, so if you’re going to give Hillary Clinton a gift for this occasion, make it several boxes of tissues because she’s still crying about the election:

Saturday marked the one-year anniversary of when, with 11 days until Election Day, former FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to members of Congress informing them that the FBI learned of the “existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation” into then-Secretary of State Clinton’s use of a private email server.

“Oh is that today?” Clinton tweeted in response to FiveThirtyEight Editor-In-Chief Nate Silver’s tweet that Clinton would have won the 2016 election if not for Comey’s letter.

Hillary’s happy to have a pollster joining her in blaming the Comey letter for the fact they all totally misread America’s mood in 2016:


It’d be more helpful if Hillary could also help remind everybody when it’s the anniversary of a server being installed in her basement or the day hard drives were scrubbed, mobile devices hammered and gov’t emails were found on serial perv Anthony Weiner’s laptop — all things that sparked the investigation(s) in the first place. Or maybe Hill could serve up reminders when it’s the anniversary of the day she stood in coal country and pledged to put an entire industry out of work or called millions and millions of people deplorable. But of course not, because it’s always somebody else’s fault.

I can’t wait to see what Clinton says on the upcoming one-year anniversary of the election. She probably submitted a tweet for focus grouping months ago and it’ll no doubt be ready to go in a few days.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

via MichelleMalkin.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/xFYtWG

Obama’s Campaign Paid $972,000 To Law Firm That Secretly Paid Fusion GPS In 2016

Was Obama involved in the dossier as well? That would explain the cover-up?

Via The Federalist:

Former president Barack Obama’s official campaign organization has directed nearly a million dollars to the same law firm that funneled money to Fusion GPS, the firm behind the infamous Steele dossier. Since April of 2016, Obama For America (OFA) has paid over $972,000 to Perkins Coie, records filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) show.

The Washington Post reported last week that Perkins Coie, an international law firm, was directed by both the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to retain Fusion GPS in April of 2016 to dig up dirt on then-candidate Donald Trump. Fusion GPS then hired Christopher Steele, a former British spy, to compile a dossier of allegations that Trump and his campaign actively colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 election. Though many of the claims in the dossier have been directly refuted, none of the dossier’s allegations of collusion have been independently verified. Lawyers for Steele admitted in court filings last April that his work was not verified and was never meant to be made public.

OFA, Obama’s official campaign arm in 2016, paid nearly $800,000 to Perkins Coie in 2016 alone, according to FEC records. The first 2016 payments to Perkins Coie, classified only as “Legal Services,” were made April 25-26, 2016, and totaled $98,047. A second batch of payments, also classified as “Legal Services,” were disbursed to the law firm on September 29, 2016, and totaled exactly $700,000. Payments from OFA to Perkins Coie in 2017 totaled $174,725 through August 22, 2017.

FEC records as well as federal court records show that Marc Elias, the Perkins Coie lawyer whom the Washington Post reported was responsible for the payments to Fusion GPS on behalf of Clinton’s campaign and the DNC, also previously served as a counsel for OFA. In Shamblin v. Obama for America, a 2013 case in federal court in Florida, federal court records list Elias as simultaneously serving as lead attorney for both OFA and the DNC.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

President Donald Trump Tweets Clinton/Russia Ties Should Be Investigated

President Donald Trump Tweets Clinton/Russia Ties Should Be Investigated

29 Oct, 2017
29 Oct, 2017

President Donald Trump’s tweeted on Sunday about the lack of investigation into Hillary Clinton and her ties to a number of scandals.

Trump tweeted:

Never seen such Republican ANGER & UNITY as I have concerning the lack of investigation on Clinton made Fake Dossier (now $12,000,000?),….

…the Uranium to Russia deal, the 33,000 plus deleted Emails, the Comey fix and so much more. Instead they look at phony Trump/Russia ….

… ‘collusion,’ which doesn’t exist. The Dems are using this terrible (and bad for our country) Witch Hunt for evil politics, but the R’s …

… are now fighting back like never before. There is so much GUILT by Democrats/Clinton, and now the facts are pouring out. DO SOMETHING!

Trump also expressed his frustration that the latest Russian scandal could distract from the task of tackling tax reform.

“All of this ‘Russia’ talk right when the Republicans are making their big push for historic Tax Cuts & Reform. Is this coincidental? NOT!” Trump tweeted.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Roger Stone Banned From Twitter, Says He’ll Sue…

Any lawyer who takes this case is simply wasting Roger’s time and money.

Via The Wrap:

Longtime Trump associate Roger Stone Jr. said he will sue Twitter in response to the company banning him from the platform.

“I have retained one of the best telecommunications lawyers in the country and will be bringing a legal action against Twitter over the suspension of my account,” he told TheWrap. “The battle for free speech has just begun.”

Stone would not publicly name the attorney until he signed a retainer agreement, which he said he expected to do Monday.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Michael Moore Melts Down Into Glob of Goo After Trump Mocks Broadway Show

Liberal propagandist Michael Moore, an aging whacko who increasingly resembles ten pounds of shit crammed into a one-pound bag went into meltdown mode after a tweet by President Trump mocked his Broadway bomb.

The morbidly obese Moore has seen his star dim considerably over the last several months after his mobs of useful idiot slackers returned to form and stopped turning out to organized protests against Trump and then his overblown one-man play failed to live up to expectations.

You have to give it to the POTUS in that he sure knows how to needle these whining hypocritical leftists and that he did with a Twitter missive on Sunday morning:

The hypersensitive fat man didn’t take kindly to Trump’s mocking of his widely panned one-man show “The Terms of My Surrender” which was just reported to have been a mega-bomb. The play was just Moore regurgitating the same tired attacks on Trump but it was loved by all of the Hollywood liberals who made their pilgrimage to Mecca to be seen with the New York cultural elite and participate in the director’s stupid liberal tricks.

Trump clearly struck a nerve given the response from the snorting porker who went on an Olbermanesque Twitter diatribe defending his shitty show.

But despite Moore’s plaintive wailings, the show was the recipient of bad reviews including from such anti-Trump publications as the Washington Post and New York Times and failed to meet expectations in terms of ticket revenue. In short, it was a stinkeroo, much like Moore’s films have become as his profiteering off of attacking the capitalist system that made him a multimillionaire with ten houses have been.

Way back in the day and despite his liberalism, Moore actually did relevant work but as a man who has always resembled the fat out of a can of pork and beans became assimilated with the Democratic party, the product became as insufferable as the director.

Trump’s tweet clearly hit Moore where it hurts and he will forever be haunted by it while Trump gets over on the buffoons on the left again.

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Liberals Celebrate Shooting Anniversaries, But Here Are 10 Dates They’d Rather Forget

Liberals hate anniversaries of positive things like the founding of our country or our victories in WWII. They do however love grim anniversaries when they can use it to push their agenda. This is especially true with gun control. In December they will say it’s been 5 years since the Sandy Hook shooting, followed immediately by a complaint that nothing has been done to further restrict our Constitutional gun ownership rights. It’s been a month since the Las Vegas shooting and wouldn’t you know it, they are at it again bitching that there has been no action on the gun control front.

The Huffington Post ran this story today: It’s Been One Month Since The Las Vegas Shooting And Bump Stocks Are Still Legal

Of course they fail to mention that it’s been 7 years since the Obama administration approved the sale of bump stocks and still no liberal will acknowledge that fact.

In honor of this narrative-driven bullshit, I thought I’d put out 10 anniversaries liberals don’t want to celebrate so much:

10. October 29, 2017: It’s been 1 day since Planned Parenthood killed 887 unborn children and the country’s biggest abortion provider is still funded by our tax dollars.

9. October 5, 2017: It’s been 3 weeks and 3 days since the NYT broke the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal and liberal Hollywood still blames Donald Trump for the sleaziness of their industry.

8. November 8, 2016: It’s been almost one year since Donald Trump won the presidency and Hillary Clinton still can’t accept the results of the election.

7. December 2, 2015: It’s been almost 2 years since Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 people in San Bernardino, CA and we still have no way of keeping radical Islamic terrorists out of our country.

6. May 24, 2006: It’s been 11 years since Al Gore said the polar ice caps would melt away and they are still as frozen as ever.

5. December 19, 1998: It’s been almost 19 years since Bill Clinton was impeached on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice and liberals still think it’s because he got a blow job.

4. January 8, 1964: It’s been 53 years since LBJ declared war on poverty and democrats are still throwing money at failed social programs that only perpetuate the cycle of poverty.

3. December 5, 1933: It’s been 84 years since this miserable failure of prohibition was repealed and democrats still think government bans are effective.

2. January 1, 1863: It’s been 154 years since Republican Abraham Lincoln took the democrats’ slaves away and liberals still insist the GOP is the party of racism.

1. December 15, 1791: It’s been almost 226 years since our Founding Fathers protected our right to keep and bear arms and liberals still refuse to acknowledge that fact.

Mark your calendars because several of these anniversaries are coming soon.

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

CNN and Mueller ‘Weinstein’ the News Cycle

CNN and Mueller ‘Weinstein’ the News Cycle
Happy Weekend!

Just as you were thinking that the Deep State ongoing soap opera l would end with Special Counsel Robert Mueller recusing himself now that failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and her DNC travelling side show had been outed, comes this:

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/11sy9G3