Democrats and Republicans alike seem to have it in their head that President Donald Trump is failing to drain the swamp.

He is draining it, however, and he’s doing so with the very best of conservative style:

His administration is cutting through Obama-era regulations like a hot knife through butter.

According to a statement the White House made in July, Trump’s making good on his promise to slash bureaucratic, ineffective regulations.

“Agencies withdrew 469 actions proposed in the Fall 2016 Agenda,” the White House stated. In other words, Trump slashed former President Barack Obama’s regulatory agenda by cutting literally hundreds of actions.

TRENDING: Clinton Nightmare: Uranium One Informant Has Video of “Briefcases Full of Cash”

The administration also “reconsidered 391 active regulatory proceedings by reclassifying them as long-term (282) or inactive (109), allowing for further careful review,” meaning that the wheat will most likely be separated from the chaff in a very big way.

And if we know the Obama administration, there’s going to be a whole lot of chaff.

Combined, that’s more than 800 regulations removed from active consideration by Trump and his team of swamp-drainers.

More good news from the statement included a fall in “economically significant regulations” by about 50 percent, down to 58.

Mick Mulvaney, Office of Management and Budget Director for President Trump, stated the administration was dealing with “that slow cancer that can come from regulatory burdens that we put on our people,” according to Reuters.

The Washington Examiner even reports that Trump is on course to top Former President Ronald Reagan when it comes to cutting regulations.

That’s a record hardly dreamed by many conservatives, but according to Competitive Enterprise Institute Vice President Clyde Wayne Crews, “It took a few years for Ronald Reagan to achieve his ultimate, one-third reduction in Federal Register pages following Jimmy Carter’s then-record Federal Register.

“So by this metric, Trump is moving much faster.”

RELATED: Defense Dept. Twitter Account Openly Attacks Trump… “Deep State” Is Everywhere

Folks, this administration might not get everything right, and we might not have everything Trump pledged yet, but know this:

Trump is making good on his promises.

H/T The Daily Wire

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about this story!

What’s the next step in draining the swamp? Scroll down to comment below!

When Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) was first indicted on corruption charges on April Fool’s Day 2015, there was widespread suspicion in the pro-Israel community that he was being punished by President Barack Obama for opposing the Iran nuclear deal.

Menendez was the second Democrat in the Senate to oppose the deal after Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), and he was also the most vociferous public critic of Obama’s policy towards Iran.

A year later, then-Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), who was often Menendez’s bipartisan partner on Iran sanctions bills, told political donors that he was convinced the Obama administration had prosecuted Melendez in retaliation. “And let me say something about Bob Menendez. I believe that Bob Menendez was indicted solely on the crime of opposing the President on Iran,” Kirk said, according to a secret audio recording of a Chicago fundraiser given to Politico.

That suspicion faded somewhat after Menendez’s friend and benefactor, Dr. Salomon Melgen, was convicted earlier this year on 67 counts of Medicare fraud. The judge in Menendez’s case also seemed inclined to believe that there was a reasonable chance the jury would convict him. But in the end, the jury could not decide whether Menendez had broken the law when he did favors for Melgen, or whether he simply did what they assume all politicians do.

Certainly Melgen had other friends in the Democratic Party, including former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. They did not face prosecution. Moreover, it soon emerged that the Obama administration had spied on opponents of the Iran deal, including members of Congress, wiretapping Israeli officials and unmasking the American citizens on the line.

Given those methods, and the mistrial, it seems more likely that Menendez was the victim of a political hit.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He was named one of the “most influential” people in news media in 2016. He is the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

With the current outrage over sexual harassment and abuse gobbling up the headlines, “brave” liberals have finally started acknowledging that democrats have a serious problem with serial rapist Bill Clinton. Sure, they just now figured out that it’s wrong to rape and grope, even for a democrat, but at least they are finally coming around. Sen Kristin Gillibrand recently said that she thought Clinton should have resigned following his very public extramarital affair and like clockwork she was attacked by one of her own.

Yesterday in The New York Times, Gillibrand went where no democrat has gone before:

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, who holds Hillary Clinton’s former seat, said on Thursday that Bill Clinton should have resigned the presidency after his inappropriate relationship with an intern came to light nearly 20 years ago.

Asked directly if she believed Mr. Clinton should have stepped down at the time, Ms. Gillibrand took a long pause and said, “Yes, I think that is the appropriate response.”

Of course Gillibrand is only talking about Clinton’s affair with intern Monica Lewinsky and ignoring the groping of Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones. She also didn’t go anywhere near the rape of Jaunita Broaddrick. Still, it is at least an acknowledgement that Bill is a scumbag.

This apparently didn’t sit well with longtime Hillary Clinton advisor Philippe Reines, who tweeted out this:

Ken Starr spent $70 million on a consensual blowjob. Senate voted to keep POTUS WJC. But not enough for you @SenGillibrand? Over 20 yrs you took the Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite.

Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck.https://t.co/KIsnfY4WLT

— Philippe Reines (@PhilippeReines) November 17, 2017

“Ken Starr spent $70 million on a consensual blowjob. Senate voted to keep POTUS WJC. But not enough for you @SenGillibrand? Over 20 yrs you took the Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite. Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck,” wrote Reines.

Wow, is this guy mad or what? Not only does he completely misrepresent everything about the Starr/Clinton investigation, he insinuates that Kristin Gillibrand will be voted out of office for questioning the mighty Clintons. Actually, if I were her, I’d be more worried about the Clinton’s erasing her from the planet as they tend to do with their enemies.

The reality of things is that Ken Starr was appointed as a special council to investigate the Clinton’s crooked Whitewater real estate deal in which dozens of people not named Clinton went to jail. During the course of his investigation he stumbled upon things like Vince Foster’s impossible suicide and Bill using an intern as a humidor. Bill lied under oath about this, which is why he was impeached and stripped of his law license. This was never a $70 million dollar blowjob investigation.

And for the record, the Whitewater investigation cost $60 million and much of that expense is attributed to the the Clinton’s filing lawsuit after lawsuit to block the investigation and to withhold evidence.

All of this is very amusing to me by the way. Kristin Gillibrand was hand-selected by Hillary to take her NY Senate seat. The Clintons have campaigned for and supported her and yet here she is with a conscience, turning on them. On top of that we have Hillary’s attack dog going after Gillibrand for stating something a democrat should have said 20 years ago. It’s kind of like watching a snake eat itself.

So liberals are finally coming around to the fact that Bill Clinton is a a total sleaze. Better late than never, I guess, but I’ll truly be impressed when one of them actually says, “Hey, maybe Bill shouldn’t have raped and groped all of those women too.”

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

Would it surprise you to know that the change to the climate so strenuously projected by scientists to occur after the year 2000 hasn’t really materialized?

Yeah, me neither.

In a study published Monday in Nature Geosience, a group of scientists confirmed what we already knew — models being used to predict global warming were way wrong.

In fact, as The Daily Caller notes, there hasn’t been very much of a temperature change at all between the years 1998 and 2014, and that models were unable to predict a 15-year “hiatus” on global warming.

“Satellite data showed a more than 20-year ‘hiatus’ in warming,” The Daily Caller writer Michael Batasch remarked.

TRENDING: Hannity Calls off Ultimatum After Receiving Letter From Roy Moore

Michael Grubb, a professor of international energy and climate change at University College London and one of the authors of the study, admitted that his initial projections were, in fact, wrong. “When the facts change, I change my mind, as (John Maynard) Keynes said,” he noted according to The Times.

He probably meant for that to sound intelligent, but basically the man believed what he believed until he was proven to be categorically wrong. That’s hardly praise-worthy.

Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at the University of Oxford, and another author of the study, said, “We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models. We haven’t seen that in the observations,” according to The Times.

They’re not the only scientists reporting the discrepancies between scientific models and reality, either. Another study in Nature Geoscience published May 2017 said the same thing.

“In the early twenty-first century, satellite-derived tropospheric warming trends were generally smaller than trends estimated from a large multi-model ensemble,” the study states in its abstract.

What’s more frustrating is that these reports of climate change models coming up short will be ignored by so many because, thanks to a rigorously “progressive” Democrat agenda, science has been turned into a political battlefield.

What do you think? Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

RELATED: Democrat Legislator Loses Her Mind After Officer Pulls Her Over

How will the left try to spin this? Scroll down to comment below!