After UK Imposes Strict Gun Laws, Gun Crime Rises 27 Percent

One of the examples Democrats point to when arguing for tighter gun legislation is the U.K., where it is illegal to own a handgun and extremely difficult to own a shotgun.

Liberals claim that fewer guns, even in the hands of law-abiding citizens, equals less crime, but they can’t prove it.

Convincing leftists that taking guns away from people has no effect on the crime rate and leaves some people absolutely defenseless is tough.

For example, in response to a 27 percent increase in crimes involving firearms reported by the Office for National Statistics, Britain is holding a two-week gun amnesty in which it hopes to get even more guns off the streets.

Sky News reported that British citizens are urged to hand over illegal firearms, which would include air guns, rifles, BB guns, shotguns, pistols, antiques and ex-military firearms.

TRENDING: Exclusive: Woman Who Worked for Moore in Her Teens Shakes Left’s Narrative

While law-abiding citizens hand over their arms, the criminals do not.

When people hand over their firearms, they are handing over their safety and security as well as their right to defend themselves.

Assistant Chief Constable and National Police Chiefs’ Council firearms lead Helen McMillan said people do not have to give their names or addresses, adding that the goal of the amnesty is to prevent dangerous situations.

“Each firearm we retrieve has the potential to save a life, so do the right thing and surrender your weapon,” she said.

“Illegal possession of a firearm can result in a five year prison sentence. If you are found guilty of possession with intent to supply, it could lead to a life sentence,” Sky News reported.

The U.K. has done this kind of thing before, and it doesn’t appear to have worked.

Making handguns illegal also hasn’t helped decrease crime in the U.K.

So what makes the government think this new sweep of weapons will make citizens safer?

RELATED: Women’s March Gives Students “Toolkits” to Be Better “Equipped” Feminists

The sad reality is that it most likely won’t.

The 27 percent increase in crime proves that confiscating guns does not make citizens safer. In fact, the statistic from the Office for National Statistics appears to suggest that it increases crime.

Democrats always love to point to the U.K.’s gun laws whenever a mass shooting takes place in the United States, suggesting that if fewer guns were in the hands of honest Americans, there would be less crime.

But they are wrong, as usual. They are pushing a false and dangerous narrative, and we cannot let them get away with it.

H/T Bearing Arms

Please like and share this story on Facebook and Twitter to spread the word about how taking guns away from law-abiding citizens does not decrease crime.

What do you think about the U.K.’s crime rate? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

Hate Crimes Targeting Jews Rise for Second Year in a Row

A cemetary caretaker inspects the damage to Jewish gravestones / Getty Images

BY:

More than half of hate crimes motivated by bias against a particular religion in 2016 were aimed at Jewish Americans even though Jewish Americans constitute just two percent of the population, according to a new FBI report.

The hate crime rate come from the FBI’s report, “Hate Crime Statistics, 2016,” the latest release from its Uniform Crime Reporting system. The overall report shows a five percent increase in hate crimes between 2015 and 2016.

Hate crimes targeted at Jewish Americans, meanwhile, increased by 20 percent in that same time period. The number of victims affected by those crimes also rose, by 17.9 percent. Hate crimes targeting Jews accounted for around 11 percent of 2016 hate crimes overall.

Jewish Americans have been the victim of the majority of religiously motivated hate crimes continuously since 1996, the earliest year for which the FBI has reported statistics. The number of offenses in 2016—833—is notably lower than those through the first ten years of reporting, which averaged more than a thousand offenses per year.

However, the number of hate crimes targeting Jews have increased year-on-year for the past two years. This represents a deviation from past trend, as said crimes decreased continually between 2008 and 2014. 2015 saw a 9 percent increase over the preceding year, and 2016’s 20 percent bump confirms this change in trend.

Although 2016 levels remain below the historical average, this two-year increase may signal a concerning increase in targeting of America’s Jews. It should be noted that violent crimes also reversed trend over the same two-year period.

Jonathan A. Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), called the two-year increase “deeply disturbing,” and called for “improving hate crime data collection, advocating for better hate crime legislation, and working closely with law enforcement on hate crime training” to address the rise.

The majority of hate crimes targeting Jews were non-violent. Thirty-seven percent of the crimes were targeted against individuals, the overwhelming majority of which were instances of intimidation. There were also 61 instances of simple assault, and 12 of aggravated assault.

The remaining 63 percent of the crimes were crimes against property. These were by-and-large instances of vandalism/destruction of property: 489 out of the 522 crimes against property.

These property crimes contribute to an overall sense of a targeting of Jewish community gathering places. Threats against synagogues and Jewish community centers have caused concern among many Americans. More than a hundred community centers have dealt with bomb threats, CNN reported in March. That wave of threats led eventually to the arrest of two men, including former Intercept journalist Juan Thompson.

Congress is considering H.R. 1730, the Combating Anti-Semitism Act of 2017, in response to the threats. That bill would increase criminal penalties for targeting religious buildings. The Muslim Jewish Advisory Council (MJAC), a joint project of the American Jewish Committee and the Islamic Society of North America, applauded H.R. 1730 in its response to the new hate crime numbers.

“We look forward to this bill’s adoption by the Congress in order to send a signal of zero tolerance for hate crimes against people of faith,” said Stanley Bergman, co-chair of the Council.

“The Department of Justice should increase its coordination with the states in public education and community relations, as well as in prosecutions and reporting of hate crimes,” said Co-Chair Farooq Kathwari.

As Bergman, Kathwari, and Congress all express concern about rising hate crimes against Jewish Americans, anti-Semitism is receiving a different hearing among some partisans on the left. Later this month, the New School in New York City will host Linda Sarsour, women’s march organizer and controversial activist for a talk on “Antisemitism and the Struggle for Justice.”

Sarsour may argue at the event that anti-Semitism is more often a charge used to silence than to name real problems. “When anti-Semitism is redefined as criticism of Israel,” the event’s description reads, “critics of Israeli policy become accused and targeted more than the growing far-right.”

Sarsour has a history of comments that critics have derided as anti-Semitic, the Free Beacon has noted:

Sarsour is one such critic of Israel who has made a variety of comments that detractors have accused of being anti-Semitic, including praising children who throw rocks at Israeli soldiers and defending former Palestinian terrorist Rasmea Odeh. She has also called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “waste of a human being,” said that “nothing is creepier than Zionism,” and argued that Zionists cannot be feminists.

This past month has also seen an increase in activity by the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS), an organization which calls for economic political action against Israel. Organizations like the ADL have attacked BDS as employing anti-Semitic strategies and rhetoric.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

More Confederate Monument Topplers Get All Felony Charges Dropped

Why bother to have any law at all? Just give in to all the anarchists now. They caught them on video, they even raided their houses and got evidence of the planning of the event. But they’re dropping the charges with their lawyer claiming there’s ‘no evidence.’ And this is why George Soros is buying DA positions across the country. You’ll see a lot more of this.

Via Daily Caller:

A North Carolinian judge dropped felony charges Tuesday against seven individuals accused of toppling a Confederate monument.

The Durham County Court previously dropped felony charges against three individuals implicated in the toppling a statue of a Confederate soldier in August, reported WNCT 9. The court dropped felony charges against another seven individuals Tuesday.

Police arrested and charged a total of 12 individuals after the Confederate statue was torn down. (RELATED: Rioter Who Toppled Confederate Statue In Durham May Received Scholarship)

Roger Echols, Durham’s district attorney, said there was no evidence indicating that “physically participated in taking the statue down,” according to WNCT 9. He also noted that the court “filed voluntary dismissals for three of the individuals charged.”

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Kneeler League Ratings Continue Slide as Anti-Police National Anthem Protests Continue

The NFL has already lost 2.5 million viewers so far this year.

After decades of American tradition of standing at attention during the National Anthem the National Football League started their own tradition last year and allowed players to kneel, sit, or stretch during the National Anthem before the games.


The Bears-Packers game was half empty on Sunday.

NFL viewership also continues to slide.

Monday Night Football ratings reached a season low this week as Pantherss beat the Dolphins.

Via Free Republic:

The post Kneeler League Ratings Continue Slide as Anti-Police National Anthem Protests Continue appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

BOW DOWN: Companies That Vowed To Stop Advertising On “Hannity” Back Down

And I knew they would.

In response to a smear campaign against Fox News host Sean Hannity led by Media Matters maggot Angelo Carusone following the host’s widely praised interview last week with Alabama senatorial candidate Roy Moore, a number of advertisers vowed to stop advertising on his weeknight news program.

According to The New York Times, however, most of these advertisers appear to be backing down:

[B]y Tuesday, those companies were clarifying — or even deleting — statements they had made on the platform that indicated they had pulled ads from Mr. Hannity’s show. …

Realtor.com said in a tweet over the weekend that “we are not currently, and will not be running TV ads on Hannity.” Later, it deleted the tweet and posted a statement on its website saying the company advertises across “dozens of television networks” and will continue placing ads on Fox News and its top shows.

“Some staff didn’t realize that we have a practice of not engaging in boycotts,” a spokeswoman said of the deleted tweet. “Senior management at Realtor.com became aware over the weekend of the error, and the tweets were taken down Sunday and the policy was posted on our corporate website.”

Volvo Car USA apparently responded to a tweet from a consumer on Monday to say, “We have spoken with our media agency and have advised them to cease advertising on the show.” But that message has disappeared. The company did not respond to requests for comment.

You damn right, mothertouchers!

Here’s Volvo’s deleted tweet:

Yes, it did, you little weasel.

Like the other advertisers, Volvo likely realized that going to war against Hannity and his millions-strong fan base would not be wise. The coffee-maker company Keurig learned this the hard way over the weekend.

As of Wednesday, Keurig had long ago apologized and made it clear it intended to keep advertising on Hannity’s. Thank you, Keurig.

As for Angelo …

I got some advice for you, you little bitch, via the slightly remixed words of Westside: “Bow down when you come to my town, bow down when we [conservative] bound, ’cause we ain’t no haters like you, bow down to some [ladies and gentlemen] that’s greater than you!”

Image H/T Pho.to

Note: The feature image shows Chinese people because trying to find an image of “businessmen bowing down” is way harder than it sounds.

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Silence on Sleaze-Bob Menendez

Silence on Sleaze-Bob Menendez
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2017

The verdict is in.

I pronounce Democrat leaders, left-wing feminists and Beltway journalists guilty of gross negligence and hypocrisy over a dirty rotten sleazeball in their midst.

For the past 11 weeks, Bob Menendez has been on trial for 18 counts of bribery, fraud and corruption involving nearly $1 million in gifts and donations. The jury remained deadlocked as of Tuesday. A new Media Research Center analysis reported that ABC, CBS and NBC devoted 40 times more of their morning and evening TV newscast coverage this past week to Alabama GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore’s alleged sexual assault accusers than to the ongoing federal trial of one of the Democrats’ most powerful, visible and entrenched figures on Capitol Hill.

Four years ago, when the FBI raided the Florida home of creepy Democratic donor and eye doctor Salomon Melgen, Menendez suddenly remembered that he had failed to pay back his “hermano” $60,000 for private-jet flights to the Caribbean — where Melgen owns a tony home in the private Casa de Campo resort.

As the party-boy buds tell it, their two decades of favor-trading were innocent, brotherly acts of affection. That little reimbursement thing for joy rides shuttling Menendez, his girlfriend, his son and his son’s office manager around the world? It “fell through the cracks,” the former chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and lawyer explained.

Oopsie.

As government investigators discovered, the “friendship” entailed much more than backslaps and beach nights. Melgen was convicted this spring on 67 counts of massive Medicare fraud totaling $90 million. Prosecutors allege Menendez and his staff pulled strings and put pressure on public officials to back off Melgen’s billing blow-up. Menendez asserts he did nothing illegal and acted not out of obligation to a high-dollar donor, but because of his sincere policy concerns about how Medicare is run.

How noble.

My favorite M&M production involves what I dubbed the 36DD visa program. This is not in dispute: Menendez and his staff pressured the State Department to expedite the foreign tourist and student visa approval processes for a bevy of buxom foreign beauties. One of them, Brazilian actress and porn pinup star Juliana Lopes Leite (a.k.a. “Girlfriend 1”), had her F-1 student visa application moved to the top of the pile in 2008 after Menendez and his staff intervened as a favor to model-lovin’ Melgen.

Another, Rosiell Polanco-Suera, testified that her rejected visa application (along with her sister’s) received reconsideration and instant approval after Melgen promised to “fix it” by reaching out to Menendez.

Flying the crony skies on taxpayer time. Systematically bilking sick old people. Turning America’s visa programs into an international dating app for Dem donors.

Ho-hum.

Top Democrat leaders, so quick to call for the resignation of GOP candidates convicted in the court of public opinion, remain noncommittal about where they’ll stand if Menendez is convicted. Liberal media partisans are deliberately ignoring the story because they are incapacitated by Trump Derangement Syndrome. Women’s advocates looked the other way at Justice Department court filings on “specific, corroborated allegations that defendants Menendez and Melgen had sex with underage prostitutes in the Dominican Republic.”

The collective silence on Sleaze-Bob — busy raising more than $6 million for his re-election campaign and legal defense fund — roars louder than Melgen’s private jet engines.

Turns out “The Resistance” can’t and won’t resist a crapweasel when Democratic Party coffers and the balance of power in Washington are at stake.

via MichelleMalkin.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/xFYtWG

400 Students Take Matters Into Own Hands After Atheists Tell Coach Not to Pray

When the atheist group Freedom from Religion Foundation sent a letter to Georgia’s East Coweta High School warning them that a tradition of coaches leading or participating in prayer with student athletes was impermissible, they probably thought they had already won the battle.

In a way, they did: the coaches didn’t lead the students in prayer. But that didn’t mean the players — or the fans — weren’t going to bow their heads before the Lord.

Instead, when East Coweta took the field Friday night, according to WAGA-TV, they had more than just the football players bowing their heads.

“Our students have done a great job and our students took it upon themselves to organize a prayer with our students in the stands before the game. Instead of it being 100 players praying, it turned into 400 students praying,” East Coweta coach John Small told the Christian Post. That’s their right and we are going to support them in that.”

And, as you can see, things seemed to have worked.

TRENDING: Mike Huckabee Destroys Colin Kaepernick After GQ Made Him “Citizen of the Year”

The whole thing began when the FFRF sent a letter to Superintendent Steve Barker on Oct. 25 about Coach Small’s praying with the team.

In a statement, the FFRF said they informed the district “that it is illegal for public school athletic coaches to further personal religious beliefs by leading their teams in prayer. Coach-led prayers, FFRF points out, equate to a government advancement and endorsement of religion — a stark violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.”

“Not only must public school coaches refrain from leading prayer themselves, but also from participating in students’ prayers, FFRF informed the district. When a public school employee in that official role organizes and advocates for team prayer, religion is endorsed on the district’s behalf.”

A memorandum drawn up by the school district said that the coaches couldn’t “bow their heads” or “manifest approval” if students led the prayer themselves, but they could still be there for it.

“We are not allowed to be in the middle of it but we have a right to be there with our players. We don’t have to flee (the scene),” Small told the Christian Post.

“If my head is bowed, nobody can tell me what I am thinking. I am not leading the prayer. I am there supporting my kids. Whether I am praying or not, nobody can say I am or I ain’t.”

As you can see, the new student-led prayer certainly didn’t make for any less prayer on the football field.

RELATED: Trump Squashes Obama’s PC Culture, Tells Conservatives Not to Be Silent

Small says that it’s “really turned into a positive” for the team.

“I think what is happened with this organization (FFRF), whatever their intent was, you tell teenagers they can’t do something, surely they are going to do it,” Small noted. “It has really turned into a positive because at the end of the day, we are trying to teach students about leadership and they should be the ones taking the charge on it anyway.”

Amen to that — literally.

H/T Faithwire

Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter if you support what the East Coweta High School football team did.

What do you think about what this team did? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

Dartmouth Prof To Donate Half Of Book Proceeds To Antifa

Does he make the check payable to George Soros?

Via Campus Reform:

A Dartmouth College professor plans to donate half of the proceeds from his latest book to Antifa, the radical protest group labeled as “domestic terrorists” by the federal government.

Mark Bray, a lecturer at the elite college, gained popularity after publishing Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, in which he openly admits that the group rejects the classical understanding of free speech.

“At the heart of the anti-fascist outlook is a rejection of the classical liberal phrase incorrectly ascribed to Voltaire that ‘I disapprove of what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,’” the professor writes, noting that “after Auschwitz and Treblinka, anti-fascists committed themselves to fighting to the death the ability of organized Nazis to say anything.”

While it is unclear how personally involved Bray is in the organization, a recent profile of the controversial professor in The Chronicle of Higher Education briefly notes that he plans to donate half of the proceeds from his book to an unnamed fund that helps support the legal, medical, and personal expenses of Antifa activists.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Tax Dollars Fund Active Military Member’s Sex-Change Surgery

On Tuesday, the Pentagon confirmed that an active-duty United States Military member underwent sex-reassignment surgery which was funded by taxpayer dollars.

“Pentagon confirms an active-duty military member received sex-reassignment surgery today, and it will pay for the procedure for the first time,” reports BuzzFeed’s Jon Passantino.

According to Defense Department spokesman Dana White, the surgery was determined to be “medically necessary” and was thus paid for by the Military’s Supplemental Health Care Program.

“Military hospitals do not have the surgical expertise to perform this type of surgery, therefore it was conducted in a private hospital,” said White, in a statement. “Since this service member had already begun a sex-reassignment course of treatment, and the treating doctor deemed this surgery medically necessary, a waiver was approved by the director of the Defense Health Agency. The Supplemental Health Care Program will cover this surgery in accordance with the Department’s interim guidance on transgender service members.”

In July, President Donald Trump restored a longstanding ban on individuals who suffer from psychological disorders like gender dysphoria, reversing a last-minute Obama Administration directive which lifted the exclusion of transgenders.

“​After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” wrote Trump, via Twitter. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you.”

As noted by Fox News, the president directed Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to pause federal funds paying for sex-reassignment surgeries and medications, “except in cases where it is deemed necessary to protect the health of an individual who has already begun the transition.”

The Pentagon was given six months to form and implement the ban Trump announced on Twitter. In September, General Mattis released a memo indicating trans folks could continue to enlist until the Trump Administration’s plan is finalized.

As reported by The Daily Wire on October 30, a federal judge temporarily blocked Trump’s proposed transgender plan “as a case against his ban works its way through court.” ​

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1TJbF1r

Report: Police Body Cameras Can Threaten Civil Rights Of Black And Brown People…

Social justice warriors wanted police body cameras, they got body cameras.

Via Newsweek:

The number of U.S. police departments outfitting their officers with body cameras increases each year, but the cameras can pose a threat to civil rights if the departments fail to set rules that govern when officers review footage from their cameras, according to a new report.

The vast majority of the nation’s biggest police departments allow officers to watch footage from body cameras whenever they want, including before they write their incident reports or make statements, said the report, which was released Tuesday by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

“Unrestricted footage review places civil rights at risk and undermines the goals of transparency and accountability,” said Vanita Gupta, former head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and current head of the Leadership Conference, in the report’s introduction.

Because an officer’s memory of an event may be altered by watching body camera footage, doing so will likely alter what officers write in their reports. That, in turn, can make it more difficult for investigators or courts to assess whether the officer’s actions were reasonable based on what he or she perceived at the time of the incident, states the report, “The Illusion of Accuracy: How Body-Worn Camera Footage Can Distort Evidence.”

Body camera programs are in place at 62 of the 69 largest U.S. police departments, according to a scorecard released Tuesday by the Leadership Conference. Most of those departments—55, or almost 80 percent—allow officers to view their footage whenever they want.

The Leadership Conference report advises that police departments institute a “clean reporting” policy, under which officers write an initial incident report before reviewing any footage. Only afterward would they watch the footage and write a second, supplementary report.

“We make the case that in the interests of consistency, fairness, transparency and accountability, clean reporting should be adopted as a standard practice for all police departments with body-worn camera programs,” writes Gupta in the introduction.

Some policing experts say officers should view the footage before writing a report to make sure the account is correct.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa