KASSAM To BBC: Bannon-Trump ‘Feud’ is Tittle-Tattle, There’s a Revolution in Iran, A Little Rocket Man in North Korea

KASSAM To BBC: Bannon-Trump ‘Feud’ is Tittle-Tattle, There’s a Revolution in Iran, A Little Rocket Man in North Korea



Breitbart London editor in chief Raheem Kassam rejected the suggestion present media scrutiny on the relationship between President Trump and Breitbart chief executive Steve Bannon would drive voters away in a television interview Thursday.

Speaking to Britain’s state-backed media channel BBC News, Kassam noted that while the words between Bannon and President Trump made good television, there were ultimately more important global developments going on which by comparison reduced the episode to little more than “tittle-tattle”.

Noting the back and forth was situation normal for national politics, Kassam said the state of North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme deserved more attention: “I think it’s a spectacle, a spectacle because there are a lot of people out there who want to make it a spectacle. If you look at the Drudge Report website in the United States and the breathless coverage of it in the media, people enjoy this, they love the tittle-tattle.

“Fair enough, fair play to them if that’s what they want to do. Let us not forget, there’s an Iranian revolution going on, there’s a little rocket man with a little nuclear button out there, there are bigger issues in the world.”

Kassam also emphasised that the episode wouldn’t damage the conservative movement in the United States. Asked whether this event would “diminish” the President’s standing with his own base, Kassam replied: “I think his supporter base is pretty firm.

“At Breitbart News, we host six hours of live radio a day, and it’s a call in show — 99 per cent of people who have called in over the past 24 hours are staunchly supportive of both Breitbart’s Steve Bannon and supportive of Trump and his political agenda.”

Kassam was the first ally of Steve Bannon on Wednesday when he appeared on the BBC’s flagship political programme Newsnight, when he reminded the host that far from there being a great rift between Bannon’s Breitbart News and the White House, Breitbart remained an ally. He said: “It sticks all together… If you look at what Steve Bannon is doing, if you look at Breitbart News, it is the only news site in the world which truly endorses the MAGA agenda, and it doesn’t need to be ‘either/or’.

“When Donald Trump is himself on the stump, he has the best political instincts of anyone in the past couple of decades, at least, to build that base and get all those people voting and to the rallies… we’re not on different sides here.”

Follow Oliver Lane on Facebook, Twitter: or e-mail: olane[at]breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Clinton Secret Trips Outside WH To See Girlfriends Almost Cost Secret Service Officer His Life

Via Washington Examiner:

A new book from one of his former Secret Service officers claims that Bill Clinton often snuck away from his wife and out of the White House to cozy up with “well-known and lesser-known mistresses,” and that a Secret Service officer in the motorcade was nearly killed in a crash during one secret escape.

Gary J. Byrne, a former Uniform Division officer at the center of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, writes in his latest book, Secrets of the Secret Service: The History and Uncertain Future of the U.S. Secret Service, that Clinton demanded a tiny motorcade to secretly dash around Washington unnoticed, ordering that the cars try to obey laws like stopped lights.

And in one of those motorcades, an unnamed Uniform Division officer trying to keep up ran a red light and was T-boned in an intersection, suffering a traumatic brain injury.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Delingpole: The Frozen U.S. Is Paying a Terrible Price for Green Lies

Delingpole: The Frozen U.S. Is Paying a Terrible Price for Green Lies



Happily the New York Times is here to put it all in context. It’s all further evidence of global warming, of course!

All is ‘explained’ in a story headed “Why so cold? Climate Change May Be Part of the Answer”

As bitter cold continues to grip much of North America and helps spawn the fierce storm along the East Coast, the question arises: What’s the influence of climate change?

Some scientists studying the connection between climate change and cold spells, which occur when cold Arctic air dips south, say that they may be related. But the importance of the relationship is not fully clear yet.

The Arctic is not as cold as it used to be — the region is warming faster than any other — and studies suggest that this warming is weakening the jet stream, which ordinarily acts like a giant lasso, corralling cold air around the pole.

The facts need not detain us here – because there aren’t any. It’s just speculation – “could”, “may” – gleaned from conversations with tame “experts” at institutions like the notoriously alarmist and fervently left-wing Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. And there’s plenty more nonsense where this came from, as Thomas Williams reported here earlier.

This determination to argue, against all evidence, that the planet is in a warming phase and that we must do more to try to cool it down would be quite funny if it didn’t have such terrible real world consequences.

One of these is the current energy crisis being experienced across New England. Blue states which bought into the man-made global warming narrative, shut down their coal-fired power stations, rejected the Access Northeast Pipeline and instead, despoiled their landscapes with more ugly, expensive, bat-chomping, bird-slicing eco crucifixes are now paying a bitter price.

As Michael Bastasch reports at Climate Change Dispatch:

Unrelenting cold since late December has caused energy demand to spike, pushing up prices and straining supplies. New England power companies are struggling to keep up with demand.

New England’s current energy woes are the result of years of state and federal policies aimed at closing coal and oil-fired power plants, largely as part of the region’s effort to fight global warming.

Yep. It’s true that mostly liberals are affected by this – and created this mess. But still, liberals’ children feel the cold as badly as conservatives’ children. In fact, being less robust and more snowflakey, probably even more so. Must they really suffer for their parents’ stupidity?

Another is the havoc the green ideology has wreaked on honest science and on once-trustworthy government institutions such as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The doughty Paul Homewood has unearthed what looks very much like yet another NOAA data-rigging scandal.

Put simply, researchers such as Marlene Kretschmer – the expert from the Potsdam Institute heavily quoted in the New York Times piece – are trying to pin recent cold winters on movements of the jet stream. This enables them to promote their “global warming is still happening” narrative. But for it to work it requires them to write off the recent cold winters, such as the one in 2013/14, as being “anomalous” – ie abnormally cold.

If they are anomalous, though, how come this fact doesn’t show up in NOAA’s temperature charts?

Homewood notes:

When she introduced [Kretschmer’s] work on the subject in 2014, Jennifer Francis specifically referred to the severe cold snap that affected the Northeast in January and February 2014, using it as an example.

The cold weather began on Jan 2nd, and lasted into April.

Yet again NOAA show absolutely nothing unusual going on in either of those months..

multigraph

multigraph

Homewood smells a rat:

Put very simply, NOAA’s temperature record bears no relevance to reality.

Knowing what I do of NOAA’s data-faking track record, I think I’m inclined to agree…

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Trump Uses Media to Pressure GOP’s Pro-Amnesty Senators

President Donald Trump used his White House meeting with pro-amnesty GOP Senators to publicly pressure them to support his popular pro-American immigration priorities.

But the group of pro-amnesty GOP’s Senators — led by Sen. Lindsey Graham — dodged the pressure as they tried to flatter Trump into weakening his support for his election-winning, immigration reform agenda.

As the Senators sat around him in the White House, Trump spoke to the voters via the media’s cameras, saying:

Our current immigration system fails Americans.  Chain migration is a total disaster, which threatens our security and our economy and provides a gateway for terrorism.  Likewise, the visa lottery is bad for our economy and very bad for security.  You saw that recently in New York along the West Side Highway.

We need a physical border wall.  We’re going to have a wall — remember that — we’re going to have a wall to keep out deadly drug dealers, dangerous traffickers, and violent criminal cartels.  Mexico is having a tremendous problem with crime, and we want to keep it out of our country.

We need to ensure our immigration officers finally have the resources, tools, and authorities that they desperately deserve and need to save and protect American lives.  Even the Border Patrol agents, as you saw recently, killed — a couple of them killed; one very badly hurt.  It’s a rough job and they’re incredible people, along with the ICE agents.  These are incredible people.  They’ve been with me right from the beginning, and they love what we’re doing.

Trump then turned on the Senators, pressuring them to support his popular goals, while his top immigration aide, Steve Miller, watched from the sidelines.

Trump got easy agreement from Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley and from Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, both of whom are pushing bills that would end the visa-lottery and chain-migration. According to the transcript, which was rushed out in full by the White House, Cotton said:

We have to end chain migration to prevent a future set of new chain migrants coming.  We have to secure our border.  We have to enforce our laws on the interior, as well, to decrease the illegal immigration that will inevitably encourage overstays.

The President and our group have been clear on that from the very beginning.  And I hope the Democrats will sit down with us and finally take yes for an answer on it.

Grassley, who is leading a loose coalition of Senators towards a Trump-style plan, said:

What you said, we were here, I think, with you on November the 8th.  We set out a program that we all agreed to here.  We know that there has to be negotiations in regard to that, but you’ve laid out some principles that we will not compromise on.

Trump called on Grassley first, and complimented Cotton and also his own chief of Staff, John Kelly, who was also in the room.

But Trump faced careful pushback from Sen. Lindsey Graham, who is sponsoring the Democrats’ main amnesty, the DREAM Act.

That huge amnesty would offer 3.25 million illegals a quick path to jobs, the welfare office and the ballot box, at a low-ball taxpayer cost of $26 billion during the first ten years. The amnesty would also mark the political death of Trump’s pro-American labor policies because it would show that business can persuade Congress to import more workers whenever wages start to rise.

Graham refused to endorse Trump’s plan, and instead tried to flatter the President, saying:

[President Barack] Obama couldn’t do it.  Bush couldn’t do it.  I think you can do it.  There’s a bill to be had.  If you want it bad enough, we’ll get it and it will be good for the country.  Everybody has got to give a little bit.  But I’ve never been more optimistic about an immigration reform proposal making it to the President’s desk right now.

Trump, however, was ready for the flattery, and flattered his former enemy in the GOP establishment and the 2016 primary race races:

Lindsey used to be a great enemy of mine, and now he’s a great friend of mine.  I really like Lindsey.  Can you believe that?  I never thought I’d say that, but I do like him a lot.

That mutual flattery hides the huge policy differences between Graham and Trump. For example, before the White House meeting, Graham chatted with radio host Hugh Hewitt and outlined his priorities. They include only small-scale wall construction, token “down payment” changes to the chain-migration system, and the reallocation of the 50,000 visa-lottery visas to business priorities. Graham said:

So here’s what’s going to happen. The diversity lottery is stupid – literally drawing names out of a hat. President Trump is right. We need to replace that and take those 50,000 visas and use them more rationally. We need to secure our border with a wall component where it makes sense. The DACA kids, you know, need a pathway forward, those who are non-felons, and we’ve got to make sure you don’t have a down payment on chain migration. We’re not going to fix it all. We’re going to break it into two parts. But the first round, there will be a down payment on breaking chain migration.

Two other pro-amnesty GOP Senators also declined to endorse Trump’s popular pro-American priorities.

Outsourcing advocate Sen. Thom Tillis repeated Graham’s flattery:

Mr. President, I just want to say exactly what Lindsey did.  And if you think about in the Obama administration, when you had the votes to pass Obamacare and you couldn’t get the DREAM Act passed, then you know there’s something structurally wrong with just the baseline.  I mean, if you just think about it, you’re providing the leadership to come up with a balance where you’re going to produce a bipartisan solution and a solution that’s consistent with your principles, which I think are important for us to fulfill the promises that we made to the American people.  And we can provide certainty to the DACA population.

Tillis also complained about public support for the wall, saying:

And shame on anybody for getting caught up in words.  The wall, for example — when we’ve got the opportunity to provide a solution, achieve your objectives, and do something good for the DACA population, then I think we should.

Tillis’ ally, Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford, also joined the flattery, while also pushing the business-first claim that there is a March 1 deadline for a DACA/Dreamer amnesty:

Mr. President, thank you for bringing all of us together.  I mentioned to you in September, when you first made the announcement about DACA, that you’d given a tremendous gift to the American people.  It’s been 20 years since we’ve had a vote on immigration of any type that’s actually passed and become law.

The immigration issues are very hard, they’re very emotional.  But there’s been no deadline.  So every time that Congress starts to work on it, they work on it for a while and then drop it because it’s difficult. You gave us a deadline, and setting that for March the 1st, and that’s a tremendous gift to be able to get that done.

Thanks for your engagement on this.  I do absolutely agree with your heart on the issues on DACA and for those kids, and be able to find — we’ve got to get a legislative solution, but we’ve got to deal with every other issue as well or we’ll just keep having DACA votes every 10 years, and we can’t do that.  So, thanks.  And, by the way, thanks for the new leadership in DHS as well.  And looking forward to seeing your leadership in the days ahead

Tillis and Lankford are pushing their SUCCEED Act amnesty. In a press conference, Lankford said illegal immigration is a good thing because it promotes competition in the labor market with Americans.

Graham is trying to include some of their SUCCEED Act proposals in the Democrats’ DREAM Act, according to media reports.

Texas Sen. John Cornyn also evaded Trump’s focus on chain-migration and the visa lottery, while touting an amnesty as a “great opportunity.” He said;

Well, Mr. President, thank you for having us here. America is the most generous country in the world when it comes to legal immigration, but that generosity has been abused by people who are exploiting the vulnerabilities we have along the border with the lack of enforcement.

And we saw the previous administration that tried to usurp the authority that only Congress and the White House have in passing immigration laws.  They tried to do it by executive action and the courts, who struck that down.

So I do think this is an important opportunity for those of us who care not only about the people and about our legal immigration system that’s benefitted us all, but also are determined to eliminate and stop illegal immigration, along with the drugs and the harm that that causes. And I do think this is a great opportunity.  I hope we make the most of it.

Coming from a border state with 1,200 miles of common border with Mexico, my constituents in Texas all understand the importance of border security and enforcement.  At the same time, they’re people with big hearts … And like you and like the rest of us who want to do the right thing by these young adults who came here as children, and I think we have a great opportunity

Vice-President Pence was in the room, and carefully distanced himself from Trump’s pro-American push by not mentioning chain-migration and the visa-lottery while he touted an amnesty. Pence said:

 Mr. President, you’ve made immigration a centerpiece in the national debate over the last year and a half.  And you said all along the way we’re going to build a wall and reform our immigration system.  We’re going to enforce the laws of this country for the citizens of this country.

But you’ve also said along the way we’re going to do it with a big heart.  And you’ve opened the door to an agreement on DACA, and today is part of an ongoing discussion with these Republican leaders but also with Democrats on Capitol Hill to accomplish that.  And I look forward to being a part of it.

Throughout the event, Trump emphasized the needs of Americans, even as he said he wants to be generous to the illegals. He said:

If we have support from the Democrats, I think DACA is going to be terrific.  We have people that have been working on this issue for a long time.  As Lindsey said, as others have said, we really are at a point where I think we could do something spectacular for the people on the border, the people coming through.

We have to be careful because there’s a drug epidemic like the likes of which we’ve never seen in this country.  We need protection.  We need the wall.  We need all of those things.  And, frankly, I think a lot of Democrats agree with us.  When they see what’s happening, when they see the kind of problems we’re having at the border, they really understand it.  Whether they’ll vote that way is another situation, but they really understand it.

So we want to thank you all for being here.  We have a great spirit going in the Republican Party.  I think it can be bipartisan.  I hope it’s going to be bipartisan.  And we take care of a lot of problems.  We can take care of a lot of problems.  It would be really nice to do it in a bipartisan way.  Okay?

Read it all here.

Trump’s priorities are very popular with voters and likely will help in the 2018 elections.

A December poll of likely 2018 voters shows two-to-one support for Trump’s pro-American immigration policies, and a lopsided four-to-one opposition against the cheap-labor, mass-immigration, economic policy pushed by bipartisan establishment-backed D.C. interest-groups. The poll for NumbersUSA is another reminder to politicians that the business-funded ‘Nation of Immigrants” polls distract attention from voters’ private views, which were shockingly displayed on the evening of November 8, 2016.

Business groups and Democrats tout the misleading, industry-funded “Nation of Immigrants” polls because they which pressure Americans to say they welcome migrants, including the roughly 700,000 ‘DACA’ illegals and the roughly 3 million ‘dreamer’ illegals.

The alternative “priority or fairness” polls — plus the 2016 election — show that voters in the polling booth put a much higher priority on helping their families, neighbors, and fellow nationals get decent jobs in a high-tech, high-immigrationlow-wage economy.

Four million Americans turn 18 each year and begin looking for good jobs in the free market.

But the federal government inflates the supply of new labor by annually accepting 1 million new legal immigrants, by providing work-permits to roughly 3 million resident foreigners, and by doing little to block the employment of roughly 8 million illegal immigrants.

The Washington-imposed economic policy of mass-immigration floods the market with foreign laborspikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.

The cheap-labor policy has also reduced investment and job creation in many interior states because the coastal cities have a surplus of imported labor. For example, almost 27 percent of zip codes in Missouri had fewer jobs or businesses in 2015 than in 2000, according to a new report by the Economic Innovation Group. In Kansas, almost 29 percent of zip codes had fewer jobs and businesses in 2015 compared to 2000, which was a two-decade period of massive cheap-labor immigration.

Because of the successful cheap-labor strategy, wages for men have remained flat since 1973, and a large percentage of the nation’s annual income has shifted to investors and away from employees.

 

 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Here we go: Breitbart board members reportedly debating dumping Bannon; Update: Mercer rebukes

Drudge heard the whispers this morning and now here’s the WSJ with confirmation. The end of “Bannonbart” really might be at hand.

Bannon’s seeing firsthand now in the harshest possible way how thin his populist-nationalist “movement” is. He says all the right things on policy, he boosts all the right candidates, but a few harsh words on Russiagate about Trump’s top cronies and he’s on the brink of losing everything, including the “killing machine” he launched into the stratosphere online. It’s a cult of personality, Steve, whatever you may have thought it was. You helped build it and then you crossed it. Enjoy the ride.

Please, though, if he ends up being fired, let us be spared from the turd-polishing spin we had to endure after he was kicked out of the White House. “He’s liberated now! He’ll be more effective on the outside!” For God’s sake, knock it off. Have some dignity.

Mr. Bannon’s longtime benefactors, billionaires Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah Mercer, are actively distancing from him even before the expected release of Michael Wolff’s book “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” according to two people close to the Mercers.

They and other Breitbart News Network LLC board members on Thursday were debating whether to oust Mr. Bannon as chairman, with many supportive of the move, according to a person familiar with the exchanges. Among the considerations are Breitbart’s contractual relationships with other entities, including Sirius XM radio, that involve Mr. Bannon…

The quarrel between the onetime political partners also is raising doubts about whether Mr. Bannon will have a financial benefactor for his run at establishment Republicans, a project that he has said is ultimately aimed at toppling Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.).

That last part is the acid test of how real Bannon’s populist movement is. If it’s about draining the swamp and making Mitch McConnell cry, not just blind loyalty to Trump, Bannon should still be able to attract money and votes for his primary challengers to GOP incumbents. His feelings on Russiagate have nothing to do with whether Kelli Ward or Chris McDaniel should be nominees for Senate if there’s any policy meat on the nationalist bone. You want a trade war with China? Stiffer borders? Less interventionism abroad? Then it’s all systems go for the Bannon candidates. But of course that won’t be the case in practice — unless Trump endorses them independently — since in the end Republicans are Trumpists, not populists. Even the ones on Breitbart’s board. “If you support the president, you can’t support Steve Bannon,” said one big GOP donor to the WSJ, matter of factly. I almost feel bad for the guy. Remember how excited he was, or pretended to be, after leaving the White House and reclaiming control of his “machine”?

Maybe he’ll catch on with that new Peter Thiel right-wing news network that may or may not be in the works. If it happens it’ll probably end up trying to get to Fox’s right by being even more slavishly pro-Trump than FNC is. Bannon’s already proved his ability to mastermind spectacular growth for a right-wing media outlet with an agenda along those lines. And now, oh the irony, he may be unhireable by Thiel or anyone else in the near term because he’s perceived as being too … anti-Trump.

Here’s McConnell on one of the best days of his political life.

Update: The kiss of death?

In a new statement Thursday, billionaire conservative donor Rebekah Mercer said that she has not spoken to Bannon, the former White House chief strategist, in many months and that she continues to support President Trump.

“I support President Trump and the platform upon which he was elected,” Mercer said. “My family and I have not communicated with Steve Bannon in many months and have provided no financial support to his political agenda, nor do we support his recent actions and statements.”

She’s Breitbart’s chief financier. How can he go on if she’s no longer supporting his agenda?

Update: Sweet Jesus. They’re not messing around.

The Mercer family, which had largely subsidized Mr. Bannon’s enterprises, began drifting from Mr. Bannon months ago amid concerns about how the controversy he was generating was affecting the family, according to family associates. The Mercers were upset further when they learned that Mr. Bannon had privately boasted that they would back him if he ran for president, according to one family associate. The Mercers cut off their funding for Mr. Bannon’s personal protective detail, the associate added.

When did it dawn on them, exactly, that Bannon wasn’t great for the Mercer family’s image? Did they think Breitbart being known, in Bannon’s own words, as “the platform for the alt-right” was going to endear them to their social circle?

The post Here we go: Breitbart board members reportedly debating dumping Bannon; Update: Mercer rebukes appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

RIP, vote-fraud commission, we hardly knew ye

In any other news cycle, this Trump administration initiative’s failure would get maximum airplay. With Donald Trump firing rhetorical missiles at both Kim Jong-un and Steve Bannon over Michael Wolff’s demeaning look at the president and his first year, the Voter Fraud Commission’s decommissioning is almost an afterthought. That’s an unfortunately appropriate end to a panel which never really got started on its mandate:

President Trump on Wednesday announced that he is disbanding a controversial panel studying alleged voter fraud that became mired in multiple federal lawsuits and faced resistance from states that accused it of overreach.

The decision is a major setback for Trump, who created the commission last year in response to his claim, for which he provided no proof, that he lost the popular vote to Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 because of millions of illegally cast ballots.

The commission met only twice amid the series of lawsuits seeking to curb its authority and claims by Democrats that it was stacked to recommend voting restrictions favorable to the president’s party.

The main problem with the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (its official title) was the environment in which it was birthed. The country has dealt with a broad range of election integrity issues for decades, including access, voting systems, counting and challenge processes, as well as proper identification and securing of the franchise itself. At times, those issues have risen to national-crisis levels, such as the aftermath of the 2000 election in which a few hundred punch-card ballots in Florida managed to stall the certification of a presidential election for two months.

In the aftermath of that crisis, Congress attempted to delve into election-integrity issues but did more damage than good. That effort prompted a push for electronic balloting that turned out to be a bad mistake, so much so that Congress will now debate a bill that would outlaw electronic-only systems altogether:

A bipartisan group of six senators has introduced legislation that would take a huge step toward securing elections in the United States. Called the Secure Elections Act, the bill aims to eliminate insecure paperless voting machines from American elections while promoting routine audits that would dramatically reduce the danger of interference from foreign governments.

The legislation comes on the heels of the contentious 2016 election. Post-election investigation hasn’t turned up any evidence that foreign governments actually altered any votes. However, we do know that Russians were probing American voting systems ahead of the 2016 election, laying groundwork for what could have become a direct attack on American democracy. …

The first objective is to get rid of paperless electronic voting machines. Computer scientists have been warning for more than a decade that these machines are vulnerable to hacking and can’t be meaningfully audited. States have begun moving away from paperless systems, but budget constraints have forced some to continue relying on insecure paperless equipment. The Secure Elections Act would give states grants specifically earmarked for replacing these systems with more secure systems that use voter-verified paper ballots.

The legislation’s second big idea is to encourage states to perform routine post-election audits based on modern statistical techniques. Many states today only conduct recounts in the event of very close election outcomes. And these recounts involve counting a fixed percentage of ballots. That often leads to either counting way too many ballots (wasting taxpayer money) or too few (failing to fully verify the election outcome).

This is a long overdue step, although it would be better for states to have concluded on their own to get rid of electronic-only systems rather than have it become a federal mandate. More to the point, though, it shows that election integrity continues to be a worrisome issue for the nation. Had the PACEI been launched on that basis and contemplated a broad range of issues, it might have had more chance of survival, let alone success.

Unfortunately, it was widely perceived as an exercise in validating Donald Trump’s claims that Hillary Clinton got 3 million or more votes illegally and nothing more. That perception sprang from Trump’s own promotion of his panel, which continued after he shut it down:

That’s a loss for election integrity that might last longer than this presidency. It will be difficult after the failure of the PACEI for Republicans to raise the issue again without the connotations to irresponsible claims related to the popular-vote totals from the 2016 presidential election. A fair review would have shown that voter-ID laws do not hamper legitimate access to the ballot — as Alabama’s special election last month proved — and given a forum to address serious concerns about security and process issues that still exist in many states, even if they have had no discernable impact on presidential elections.

Hopefully, Congress will follow up on the bill (sponsored by Oklahoma Republican James Lankford) with the broader review that the PACEI failed to provide. Otherwise, we may have to deal with these issues for another decade or more until the taint clears on presidential reviews of election integrity.

The post RIP, vote-fraud commission, we hardly knew ye appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com

BREAKING: DOJ Deal Gives Chairman Nunes Access to ‘All’ Unredacted Docs and Witnesses Sought in Russia Witch Hunt

BREAKING: DOJ Deal Gives Chairman Nunes Access to ‘All’ Unredacted Docs and Witnesses Sought in Russia Witch Hunt

House investigators this week will have access to all unredacted documents and witnesses they had sought under a deal between Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, Catherine Herridge of Fox News reported.

Among the eight witnesses the House investigators will have access to is Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page.

The remainder of the hateful text messages between the two lovebirds will be delivered to investigators by January 11.

Fox News reported:

The letter, from Nunes to Rosenstein, summarizes an “agreement” reached on a phone call Wednesday evening and also says key FBI and Justice Department witnesses in the probe will be provided for interviews later this month.

“It is my hope that this agreement will provide the Committee with all outstanding documents and witnesses necessary to complete its investigations,” Nunes wrote.

[…]

Nunes’ letter outlines the terms of the deal reached, as he seeks information that could shed light on whether the controversial anti-Trump “dossier” was used to open the Russia probe and justify surveillance on Trump campaign officials.

[…]

According to the letter, committee investigators also will get access to eight key witnesses this month including FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who exchanged anti-Trump text messages during an affair and previously worked on the special counsel’s Russia probe; FBI general counsel James Baker, who was reassigned; FBI head of counterintelligence Bill Priestap, whom ex-FBI boss James Comey testified made the decision not to brief Congress about the Russia case during last year’s election; and Bruce Ohr, a DOJ official reassigned after concealing meetings with figures involved in the dossier.

Nunes and GOP lawmakers on the Intel Committee gave the Department of Justice and FBI until Wednesday (January 3rd) to turn over requested documents on the phony Trump dossier.

On Wednesday night Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), a member of the House Freedom Caucus, told Lou Dobbs Congress may file contempt of Congress charges against the DOJ and FBI for failing to produce documents subpoenaed by Congress.

On Wednesday afternoon Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray met with Speaker Paul Ryan for two hours on Capitol Hill. The two Deep State officials told Ryan they will finally deliver the subpoenaed documents to Congress.

It took House investigators threatening DOJ and FBI officials with jail to have them turn over these requested documents. Unbelievable.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

2018 Starts with a Bang! Dow Breaks 25,000 – Ties Record for Fastest 1,000 Point Jump in History

Guest post by Joe Hoft

2018 is starting off where 2017 left off.  The Dow reached 25,000 for the first time in history as the Dow reached new all time highs two of the first three days the market was open. 

President Trump’s first year in office resulted in the greatest year in stock market history! The Dow ended up nearly 5,000 points for the year which was the highest increase in the Dow’s more than 100 year history. The Dow reached all-time new highs a record 71 times in 2017, breaking the record for the most all-time highs in a calendar year set in 1995.

At the final bell today the Dow closed at its highest closing amount ever at 25,075. Since the 2016 election the Dow is up almost 37%!

* The Dow increased more than 6,700 points since the November 8th 2016 election when the Dow closed at 18,333. This is the largest point increase in this amount of time in Dow history. This has never happened in the more than 100 years in the Dow.

* The Dow increased more in 2017 than any year ever in Dow history! The Dow ended 2016 at 19,763 and increased nearly 5,000 points. This is the most ever by more than 40% over the next best year ever! (In 2013 the Dow was up 3,472 points.

* Since the election the Dow has surpassed 7 major milestones – 19,000, 20,000, 21,000, 22,000, 23,000, 24,000 and 25,000.

* President Trump’s stock market rally is historical! No President has seen more all time highs (71) in their first year in office than President Trump. No one has seen more all-time highs in a year ever.

* President Trump set the record earlier this year for the most all time closing stock market highs during his first year in office. By year end the Dow has set 90 closing highs since the 2016 election. (As a comparison, President Obama had no stock market highs his entire first term.)

* More than one in four days since the election has ended in a new stock market high.

* The Dow closed above 20,000 on January 25th 2016 and the March 1st 2016 rally matched the fastest-ever 1,000 point increase in the Dow at 24 days that the markets were open or 35 actual days.  Today’s rally matched this record.

* The Dow took just 66 market open days to climb from 19,000 to above 21,000, the fastest 2,000 point run ever. The Dow closed above 19,000 for the first time on November 22nd 2016 and closed above 21,000 on March 1st 2017. The previous record was in 2007 when the Dow took nearly three times as long to cover 2,000 points.

* The Dow took just 173 days to surpass the 3,000 point milestone between November 22, 2016 when the Dow surpassed 19,000 and August 2nd, 2017 when the DOW surpassed 22,000. The prior record was in 1999 when the Dow took more than four times as long to reach these heights.

* The Dow surpassed the 23,000 mark on October 18th. This increase of 4,000 points in all-time highs in this amount of time is unheard of in US history!

* On November 30th the Dow broke the 24,000 barrier for the first time ever and today the Dow topped 25,000!

* Since President Trump’s Inauguration on January 20th the Dow is up 26%. (It was at 19,827 at January 20th.)

* President Trump is the only President in US history to oversee two stock market rallies of nine days or more where the markets set new highs each and every day.

* On February 28th President Trump matched President Reagan’s 1987 record for most continuous closing high trading days when the Dow reached a new high for its 12th day in a row!
* Then in early August President Trump reigned over a 9 day stock market rally with each day reaching record highs.

* The S&P 500 and the NASDAQ have both set new all-time highs during this period.
* The US Stock Market has gained more than $5 trillion in wealth since Trump was elected!
* Virtually every major stock index is in record territory.

In nearly every economic indicator the economy is moving in the right direction. If this continues President Trump will sit over one of the greatest, if not the greatest economic boom in US history.

Stock Market – Winning! Jobs – Winning! GDP – Winning! Trump – Winning! USA – Winning!

The post 2018 Starts with a Bang! Dow Breaks 25,000 – Ties Record for Fastest 1,000 Point Jump in History appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Report: More Than A Dozen Dem Lawmakers Met With Psychiatrist For 2 Days To Discuss Trump’s Mental Health

Completely improper for any psychiatrist to make any diagnosis without actually examining a patient. And lawmakers catering to such nonsense are just as ridiculous. And this is all about helping sell the book the psychiatrist wrote with other psychiatrists who violated their oath.

Via Biz Pac Review:

President Trump’s brazen and unconventional style has Democrats quivering on the edge of their seats with fear and anticipation.

More than a dozen lawmakers met with a Yale University psychiatry professor last month to discuss the mental health of the Commander-in-Chief, Politico reported.

Dr. Bandy X. Lee was invited to brief the lawmakers after she had issued a warning that President Trump was showing “signs” that he was “going to unravel.”

The lawmakers in attendance were all Democrats except for one unidentified Republican senator who Lee refused to disclose to Politico.

The President’s tweets seem to be at the core of concern.

“We feel that the rush of tweeting is an indication of his falling apart under stress,” Lee told Politico.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Pro-Lifers Celebrate as 7 States Compete to Be the First That Is Abortion-Clinic Free

There are currently seven states that have only one abortion clinic left in operation: Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming and West Virginia.

That in itself is good news.

Even better news is that Kentucky is poised to become the first state without any abortion clinics at all.

The fate of the EMW Women’s Surgical Center in Louisville is in the hands of the court — a case that goes back months due to the clinic’s failure to comply with state regulations. The clinic reportedly is not adequately prepared to help patients should an emergency arise, according to The Associated Press.

Pro-life Gov. Matt Bevin wants to see the clinic shut down.

TRENDING: Race-Baiters Take 1 Look at GA Dep. of Correction’s Christmas Card and Lose It

His administration claimed that the EMW clinic is not equipped to handle emergencies, and that it is not in compliance with state laws that require it to have arrange for hospital and ambulance services for any such emergencies.

The governor’s administration moved to revoke the clinic’s license if it did not comply with regulations.

The state also did not grant Planned Parenthood in Louisville a license for the same reason — it was not equipped to handle emergency situations. This happens to be the same facility that was caught performing abortions without a license in 2016.

Of course, the EMW clinic and Planned Parenthood are suing the state.

The hearing took place in September, but a verdict was not decided. The EMW clinic remains open — for now.

That could change soon, and Kentucky could make history for the best reason ever: life.

A decision in the case could be made as early as this month, reported The Telegraph.

With any hope, we will see this happen not just in Kentucky, but other states as well.

RELATED: Billboards Begin Popping Up With Bold-Faced Lie About “Safer” Solution With Abortions

Abortion clinics have been closing at a rapid rate in the past few years. A report by Bloomberg claimed that at least 162 abortion facilities have closed or stopped offering abortions, while just 21 opened since 2011.

Abortion rights activists would say that clinics are targeted by conservatives and pro-life proponents, but what they cannot bring themselves to accept is that more women are simply choosing not to have abortions.

This is incredible news for pro-lifers and the unborn.

H/T The Daily Wire

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter to spread the word about this amazing news.

What do you think about these states having just one abortion clinic? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE