Two people charged with defrauding minority set-aside program in Chicago

When governments play favorites on the basis of race in awarding contracts, the real scandal isn’t people who illegally pretend to be of the favored race or gender or ethnicity, but the discrimination practiced by the government. That is my takeaway from this story by Samantha Bonkamp of the Chicago Tribune.  


The president and manager of a car wash that was under contract to wash city vehicles have been charged with defrauding Chicago of more than $900,000 by allegedly using suppliers that didn’t comply with the minority business requirements. The two allegedly devised a scheme to inflate prices and make it appear as if the car wash was in line with the rules.



Apparently, they did business with suppliers of the “wrong” ethnicity and then inflated the prices as well as pretended that they were of the “correct” (i.e., favored by the government) ethnicity or sex.


According to a news release distributed by the attorney general’s office, the Balzanos, who are married, worked with a subcontractor sanctioned by the city’s minority business enterprise rules, Oak Park-based PJ’s Ace Hardware, who then allegedly created fake invoices for car wash products that were sold and delivered by suppliers who were not minority-owned.


John Balzano placed orders directly with those suppliers, the attorney general’s office said, and then PJ’s Ace Hardware allegedly created new invoices, marked up by 15 to 20 percent. Balzano paid those, officials allege, to make it appear that J&J Car Wash was complying with the city’s minority business contract goal to spend at least 16.9 percent of the total contract price with minority-owned businesses.


J&J President Natalie Balzano then submitted bids to the city for car wash contracts. The city estimates it lost $931,949 in the so-called “pass-through” scheme.


It is unclear to me if the total sum of nearly a million dollars represents the fraudulent markups, or the total spent on the suppliers of the “wrong” disfavored ethnicity. The fraudulent markups would be illegal under any system of law, but the portion of the actual spending (minus the markup) is only fraudulent under  scheme of governmental racial preferences. If the suppliers had been of the “correct” ethic status, apparently the extra money paid via markups would be just fine as far as the government is concerned.


To me, the scandal of crooks inflating invoices is ordinary crime, detestable but not indicative of a rotten system. But the government playing favorites, and evidently allowing – even demanding — higher prices be paid to people of an immutable status that the state favors in the current moment, is corrosive to foundational principles of this country.


When governments play favorites on the basis of race in awarding contracts, the real scandal isn’t people who illegally pretend to be of the favored race or gender or ethnicity, but the discrimination practiced by the government. That is my takeaway from this story by Samantha Bonkamp of the Chicago Tribune.  


The president and manager of a car wash that was under contract to wash city vehicles have been charged with defrauding Chicago of more than $900,000 by allegedly using suppliers that didn’t comply with the minority business requirements. The two allegedly devised a scheme to inflate prices and make it appear as if the car wash was in line with the rules.



Apparently, they did business with suppliers of the “wrong” ethnicity and then inflated the prices as well as pretended that they were of the “correct” (i.e., favored by the government) ethnicity or sex.


According to a news release distributed by the attorney general’s office, the Balzanos, who are married, worked with a subcontractor sanctioned by the city’s minority business enterprise rules, Oak Park-based PJ’s Ace Hardware, who then allegedly created fake invoices for car wash products that were sold and delivered by suppliers who were not minority-owned.


John Balzano placed orders directly with those suppliers, the attorney general’s office said, and then PJ’s Ace Hardware allegedly created new invoices, marked up by 15 to 20 percent. Balzano paid those, officials allege, to make it appear that J&J Car Wash was complying with the city’s minority business contract goal to spend at least 16.9 percent of the total contract price with minority-owned businesses.


J&J President Natalie Balzano then submitted bids to the city for car wash contracts. The city estimates it lost $931,949 in the so-called “pass-through” scheme.


It is unclear to me if the total sum of nearly a million dollars represents the fraudulent markups, or the total spent on the suppliers of the “wrong” disfavored ethnicity. The fraudulent markups would be illegal under any system of law, but the portion of the actual spending (minus the markup) is only fraudulent under  scheme of governmental racial preferences. If the suppliers had been of the “correct” ethic status, apparently the extra money paid via markups would be just fine as far as the government is concerned.


To me, the scandal of crooks inflating invoices is ordinary crime, detestable but not indicative of a rotten system. But the government playing favorites, and evidently allowing – even demanding — higher prices be paid to people of an immutable status that the state favors in the current moment, is corrosive to foundational principles of this country.






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Iran’s mullahs go bonkers after Saudi crown prince’s 60 Minutes interview

Well, the reactions are out. Saudi Arabia’s decisive new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, has ruffled the mullahs’s feathers in Iran, following his interview Sunday with 60 Minutes and the preview of it earlier last Thursday. The prince came off as charming, articulate, smooth, intelligent and very sane. That was enough to trigger from Tehran a whole lot of inchoate fury after the crown prince outlined his country’s reforms and put them in contrast to Iran’s miserable tyranny, throwing in a putdown about the regime’s falling power and influence.


Get a load of this exchange, reported by RT News, citing the Tehran Times:



“Iran is not a rival to Saudi Arabia. Its army is not among the top five armies in the Muslim world,” the royal added. “The Saudi economy is larger than the Iranian economy. Iran is far from being equal to Saudi Arabia.”


However, Qasemi responded harshly to the prince’s criticisms while also highlighting the success of the Iran nuclear deal. “His words are not worth responding to, because he is a delusional naive person who just tells bitter lies and nothing but inconsiderate remarks,” he replied.


“It is better for a country which has been brought to its knees after three years of committing war crimes against the besieged and defenseless Yemeni people not to talk about its army and economy and be happy with buying ‘beautiful’ weapons and the remain importer of security and be silent in the face of a powerful country like Iran,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry said as cited by The Tehran Times.


It’s interesting that this mullah response didn’t get much play in the press – the only source I could find it in was RT News, the Russian propaganda organ that enjoys stirring up the pot. Touchy, touchy, sensitive mullahs when the Saudi crown prince calls them out on their support for terrorism in Yemen and their miserable condition – so miserable, the Saudi declared they weren’t even a rival, which is stretching it, but we liked the insult.


If the mullahs don’t like what the Saudi crown prince said, it’s all the more reasons to like him. President Trump sure seemed to enjoy him, and joked around with the man, too. Hard to not like the gutsiness of the Saudi for saying this stuff – and directing it right at a country whose leadership is probably the most destructive in the region, both to its own people and to its disgusted neighbors.


 


 


Well, the reactions are out. Saudi Arabia’s decisive new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, has ruffled the mullahs’s feathers in Iran, following his interview Sunday with 60 Minutes and the preview of it earlier last Thursday. The prince came off as charming, articulate, smooth, intelligent and very sane. That was enough to trigger from Tehran a whole lot of inchoate fury after the crown prince outlined his country’s reforms and put them in contrast to Iran’s miserable tyranny, throwing in a putdown about the regime’s falling power and influence.


Get a load of this exchange, reported by RT News, citing the Tehran Times:


“Iran is not a rival to Saudi Arabia. Its army is not among the top five armies in the Muslim world,” the royal added. “The Saudi economy is larger than the Iranian economy. Iran is far from being equal to Saudi Arabia.”


However, Qasemi responded harshly to the prince’s criticisms while also highlighting the success of the Iran nuclear deal. “His words are not worth responding to, because he is a delusional naive person who just tells bitter lies and nothing but inconsiderate remarks,” he replied.


“It is better for a country which has been brought to its knees after three years of committing war crimes against the besieged and defenseless Yemeni people not to talk about its army and economy and be happy with buying ‘beautiful’ weapons and the remain importer of security and be silent in the face of a powerful country like Iran,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry said as cited by The Tehran Times.


It’s interesting that this mullah response didn’t get much play in the press – the only source I could find it in was RT News, the Russian propaganda organ that enjoys stirring up the pot. Touchy, touchy, sensitive mullahs when the Saudi crown prince calls them out on their support for terrorism in Yemen and their miserable condition – so miserable, the Saudi declared they weren’t even a rival, which is stretching it, but we liked the insult.


If the mullahs don’t like what the Saudi crown prince said, it’s all the more reasons to like him. President Trump sure seemed to enjoy him, and joked around with the man, too. Hard to not like the gutsiness of the Saudi for saying this stuff – and directing it right at a country whose leadership is probably the most destructive in the region, both to its own people and to its disgusted neighbors.


 


 






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

“Depraved” Somali Cop ‘Mistakenly’ Kills Innocent Woman, So Prosecutor KNOCKS HIS ASS OUT Out With A Murder Charge

He’s in some deep shit, and rightly so.

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

While responding to a report of possible sexual assault last July in Minneapolis, Minnesota, a Somali cop who had reportedly graduated from a “quicker, nontraditional” fast-track training program discharged his weapon, killing an Australian white woman by the name of Justine Damond, according to the Star Tribune:

The shot came after [Somali cop Mohamed] Noor and his partner, Matthew Harrity, had driven through the alley behind Damond’s home, saw no suspicious activity and were preparing to leave when they were surprised by someone outside the police car. Harrity, the driver, told investigators he was “spooked,” feared for his life, and took his gun from its holster before Noor reached across and fired his weapon out the driver’s side window.

Harrity looked out his window and saw Damond clutching her abdomen with both hands. He recalled her saying, “I’m dying,” or “I’m dead.”

Following the fatal shooting, Noor’s family released a statement claiming his decision to reach across his partner and discharge his weapon at Damond had been nothing but a simple ol’ mistake.

“We feel so bad about this, we are traumatized ourselves. It’s so unfortunate. If you wait for the investigation you’ll know it was an honest and sincere event that transpired. Until then we can’t really say anything,” his family said.

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman disagreed. On Tuesday he reportedly indicted Noor on third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, citing the Somali cop’s “depraved mind” as evidence:

“A person sitting in a passenger seat of a squad car takes a gun, hears a noise, maybe sees some object … he reaches across in front of his partner, shoots a gun at an object that he can’t see. That’s evidence of a depraved mind in my view,” he said.

“There is no evidence that … Officer Noor encountered, appreciated, investigated or confirmed a threat that justified the decision to use deadly force. Instead, Officer Noor recklessly and intentionally fired his handgun from the passenger seat, a location at which he would have been less able than Officer Harrity to see and hear events on the other side of the squad car.”

However, there’s plenty of evidence to suggest Noor should never have been hired. Though he’d been on the force for only two years, he already “had three complaints on file,” including two that still remained under investigation, as reported last year by Saint Paul station KSTP.

Moreover, The Australian confirmed that he graduated “after being placed in an ­accelerated program and spent just eight months in the classroom, because he already had a business degree.”

While it’s unclear whether racial quotas played a role in Noor being hired, the Star Tribune pointed out that “[s]ome law enforcement professionals” support the accelerated program because it’s “a way to attract more diverse people with broader life experiences.”

In other words, they support it because it promotes so-called diversity …

Question: How’s that “diversity” working out for ya’ll?

H/T RedState

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Judicial Watch Sues for Records of Clinton State Department Protocol Officer

Judicial Watch Sues for Records of Clinton State Department Protocol Officer
WASHINGTON—Judicial Watch announced today that it sued the U.S. Department of State for emails, calendar entries and other information in the electronic file of Dennis Cheng, who was Deputy Chief of Protocol for two years under former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Judicial Watch v U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv-00221)).

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

SCOTUS Concerned with CA Law

SCOTUS Concerned with CA Law

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument today for National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra, one of four cases brought by crisis pregnancy centers challenging a California law as a violation of the First Amendment. Argument inside the Court lasted for one hour.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Plot Twist: WE Paid For Hillary To Travel To India And Talk Shit About Us

This really ticks me off!

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

Remember how earlier this month failed Democrat presidential nominee and loser Hillary Clinton traveled to India to talk garbage about half of America?

As noted by Katherine Timpf over at National Review, Clinton “basically called half the country racist” and “basically characterized women who voted for Trump as thoughtless vacuums for their husband’s opinions rather than as actual human beings.”

Charming woman.

Unfortunately, because Clinton is a former First Lady, she gets to benefit from “U.S. Secret Service protection for life,” including while on trips, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

And since we the American people fund the Secret Service (whose members themselves have certainly never been a fan of Clinton), this in turn means WE essentially paid for her to travel to India and talk garbage.

We paid “at least $22,000,” to be precise:

[T]he State Department awarded two contracts worth $16,143 and $6,301 for her security detail’s travel and lodging on the trip.

The contracts do not name Clinton but say they are awarded for the Secret Service to “support FFLOTUS,” an acronym used for former first ladies, on a March 2018 trip to India. The contract was awarded by the U.S. embassy in New Delhi, which operates under the State Department’s Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs.

Both contracts are for “logistic services for USSS to support FFLOTUS visit” and say they are for “travel/lodging.”

It is unclear whether the two contracts account for all of the government spending related to Clinton’s India trip.

Two other contracts, one worth $21,093 and another worth $23,690, were awarded by the American Consulate in Mumbai for March hotel reservations for Secret Service agents in Mumbai and Maheshwar, another town Clinton visited on her trip.

I’m not certain why the $21,093 and $23,690 cited at the end weren’t included in the Beacon’s total estimate. If you combine all four values ($16,143, $6,301, $21,093 and $23,690), you get a total of $67,227 of our money wasted to fund Clinton’s bitchfest.

And because of our government’s misguided commitment to treating former presidents and their families like lifelong rock stars, this likely won’t be the last time we pay for Clinton talk shit.

Annoying!

H/T TheBlaze