Month: March 2018

Posted on

Juanita Broaddrick: Media Won’t Interview Me About Clinton Rape ‘Because I’m Not A Porn Star’

For the mainstream media, the Stormy Daniels story is tailor made. A gigantic-breasted pornographic “actress” who claims she had an extramarital affair with Donald Trump: What could be more perfect than that for the Trump-hating MSM?

Certainly not the tales of the women who say they were assaulted by former President Bill Clinton. The MSM snubbed them and, at various points along the way, even derided them as liars. Although the similarity of the accounts — which just kept piling up — made each more believable than the last, the liberal media shunned the women and defended the Democratic president.

On the other hand, with Daniels, the MSM believes every word out of her mouth — despite many of her claims being completely unverified. The response to her allegations are a far cry from that given to Clinton’s alleged victims: Juanita Broaddrick, who said he raped her in a Little Rock, Arkansas hotel room; Paula Jones, who said he sexually assaulted her; and Kathleen Willey, who accused him of groping her in the Oval Office.

Now, Broaddrick is calling out CNN and Anderson Cooper.

“HEY 60 MINUTES @andersoncooper HOW ABOUT HAVING ME ON To Discuss my Book, “You’d Better Put Some Ice On That”. ….What Bill Clinton said to me after he Raped Me,” Broaddrick said in a Twitter post.

Broaddrick’s book details the incident with Clinton, including the only words he spoke to her after the alleged rape before he “put on his sunglasses” and left. But Broaddrick says because she’s not a porn “star,” the MSM didn’t care.

“I’m not a porn star, I was a hard-working nurse and businesswoman,” Broaddrick said on Fox News’ Sean Hannity show. “I wasn’t a porn star so that’s why they weren’t interested in me.”

Jones also weighed on the exorbitant coverage of Daniels. “There’s no comparison,” she said.

“Jones recalled how political commentator James Carville, then a Clinton White House adviser, told the media ‘you can drag a dollar through a trailer park’ and people like Jones will make allegations against the president for that dollar,” Fox News Insider reported.

Broaddrick and Jones called the coverage of Daniels’ allegations “insane,” and noted that even if Trump had sex with Daniels, it was consensual unlike in the case of Broaddrick’s accusation.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Posted on

75% Of Parents Are Helping Their Adult Children Pay Bills

An astounding 75% of parents with adult children are helping them pay some of their bills, according to a new report from CreditCards.com

The financial planning site found that most parents of kids over the age of 18 “help them pay debts and living expenses. Thirty nine percent pay their cellphone, 36 transportation, 24 rent, 21 utilities and 20 percent pay their kids’ student loans.”

“They pay everything for me, because I just turned 18,” one woman who spoke to CBS news said. She followed that up by saying she knows people in their 40s whose parents still pay their cell phone bill.

Local media covering the study found a variety of excuses from parents whose children still live at home rent-free, or who are subsidizing their kids in other ways, but most of them center around parents willing to pick up the slack while millennials “follow their dreams.”

“As a grad student, it’s kind of impossible to do that – work and study,” one woman told CBS New York.

If they’re working to acquire marketable skills and actively looking for full-time employment, parenting expert Tammy Gold told the same network, paying some of their bills, so that kids are able to stay afloat is fine. But in many cases, parents are being easily taken advantage of.

“If your child is trying and doing everything right, they’re trying to get a job, every day they’re building their skills, and nothing’s working, it’s OK to help them,” Gold told CBS. “If they are spending thousands of dollars, if they’re abusing the privilege of being home, that’s not OK.”

There is a major financial burden on millennials, and it begins with student loan debt. The cost of higher education is steadily climbing, thanks to steadily climbing government subsidies to four year public universities, but so is the availability of degrees with no return on investment. It’s understandable if parents want to help their kids stay afloat during tough times, but it can’t be on parents to make up the difference when students aren’t looking out of themselves.

One parent says she believes her children will repay her by taking care of her in her old age. That may be a bad bet.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Posted on

Trump vindicated on Paris Climate Accord pull-out

When President Trump announced the U.S. pull-out from the Paris Climate Accord last year, the left howled.


Here’s what the top bureaucrats at the United Nations had to say at the time:



[United Nations spokesman Stephane] Dujarric reiterated [U.N. secretary-general Antonio] Guterres’ June 1 statement calling the U.S. decision to withdraw “a major disappointment for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote global security.”


“It is crucial that the United States remains a leader on climate and sustainable development,” Dujarric said.  “Climate change is impacting now.  He looks forward to engaging with the American government and all other actors in the United States and around the world to build the sustainable future for our children and future generations.”


It was all such horse hockey.


Latest news from the International Energy Agency is that Paris Climate Accord nations, which is pretty much all of them, reported not a decline in greenhouse gases, but a 1.7% spike.  Here is what New York magazine reported:


This week, the International Energy Agency announced that carbon emissions grew 1.7 percent in 2017, after an ambiguous couple of years optimists hoped represented a leveling off, or peak; instead, we’re climbing again.  Even before the new spike, not a single major industrial nation was on track to fulfill the commitments it made in the Paris treaty.  To keep the planet under two degrees of warming – a level that was, not all that long ago, defined as the threshold of climate catastrophe – all signatory nations have to match or better those commitments.  There are 195 signatories, of which only the following are considered even “in range” of their Paris targets: Morocco, Gambia, Bhutan, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, India, and the Philippines.


The headline suggests that the whole idea of lowering emissions through an international, Europe-based bureaucracy is increasingly “a fantasy.”


Greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down under this hideous accord, and not just because it gives a pass to rapidly growing third-world countries – pretty much all of them – to pollute away and let cutting emissions be America’s burden.  There is also the phenomenon of how the more a place goes “green,” the more fossil fuels it uses.  Like those electrical cars?  They run on clean, green electricity all right – from plants that burn coal.  Downstream, going green is very, very carbon-intensive, and it should surprise no one that sanctimonious western Europe, with all its green pontificating, is the very worst violator of them all.  How proudly green they are, and how very, very greenhouse-y they go to get there.




The Foundation of Green.  Art Installation at Santa Monica College by Monica Showalter.


The New York magazine article also reports that were nations to really adhere to the Paris accord, it would require land use the size of India and a sacrifice of about 250 million people – roughly a Great Leap Forward’s worth, again, courtesy of central planning.  The United Nations echoed that finding late last year in a report described here, so it’s not an anomalous forecast.  Sound attractive?


What’s efficient is nuclear energy and fossil fuels, something else the left screams about.  Don’t expect the greenhouse gas crowd in Europe to pay attention to this; they are too busy trying to get their Priuses started so they can save the lebensraum, or whoops, the Earth.


What it does amount to is vindication for President Trump, who wanted to get us out of that hellish pact, the work of petty bureaucrats.  The U.S. in fact is the least bad offender compared to Europe, China, and India, and for the obvious reason that the U.S. abhors central planning.  German automakers are all in on greenhouse gas reduction, but they say companies must find ways to do this on their own, not as a function of one-size-fits-all central planning diktats.  The free market can trump anything the central planners claim they can correct.


It’s supremely ironic that the Paris Accord is now synonymous with higher emissions and more greenhouse gases.  But that’s central planning for you.  It’s not at all different from the initial claims about Obamacare as it was being sold to the public: that it would make health insurance more affordable, not less.  Funny how such results happen every time you give central planning a try.


When President Trump announced the U.S. pull-out from the Paris Climate Accord last year, the left howled.


Here’s what the top bureaucrats at the United Nations had to say at the time:


[United Nations spokesman Stephane] Dujarric reiterated [U.N. secretary-general Antonio] Guterres’ June 1 statement calling the U.S. decision to withdraw “a major disappointment for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote global security.”


“It is crucial that the United States remains a leader on climate and sustainable development,” Dujarric said.  “Climate change is impacting now.  He looks forward to engaging with the American government and all other actors in the United States and around the world to build the sustainable future for our children and future generations.”


It was all such horse hockey.


Latest news from the International Energy Agency is that Paris Climate Accord nations, which is pretty much all of them, reported not a decline in greenhouse gases, but a 1.7% spike.  Here is what New York magazine reported:


This week, the International Energy Agency announced that carbon emissions grew 1.7 percent in 2017, after an ambiguous couple of years optimists hoped represented a leveling off, or peak; instead, we’re climbing again.  Even before the new spike, not a single major industrial nation was on track to fulfill the commitments it made in the Paris treaty.  To keep the planet under two degrees of warming – a level that was, not all that long ago, defined as the threshold of climate catastrophe – all signatory nations have to match or better those commitments.  There are 195 signatories, of which only the following are considered even “in range” of their Paris targets: Morocco, Gambia, Bhutan, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, India, and the Philippines.


The headline suggests that the whole idea of lowering emissions through an international, Europe-based bureaucracy is increasingly “a fantasy.”


Greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down under this hideous accord, and not just because it gives a pass to rapidly growing third-world countries – pretty much all of them – to pollute away and let cutting emissions be America’s burden.  There is also the phenomenon of how the more a place goes “green,” the more fossil fuels it uses.  Like those electrical cars?  They run on clean, green electricity all right – from plants that burn coal.  Downstream, going green is very, very carbon-intensive, and it should surprise no one that sanctimonious western Europe, with all its green pontificating, is the very worst violator of them all.  How proudly green they are, and how very, very greenhouse-y they go to get there.




The Foundation of Green.  Art Installation at Santa Monica College by Monica Showalter.


The New York magazine article also reports that were nations to really adhere to the Paris accord, it would require land use the size of India and a sacrifice of about 250 million people – roughly a Great Leap Forward’s worth, again, courtesy of central planning.  The United Nations echoed that finding late last year in a report described here, so it’s not an anomalous forecast.  Sound attractive?


What’s efficient is nuclear energy and fossil fuels, something else the left screams about.  Don’t expect the greenhouse gas crowd in Europe to pay attention to this; they are too busy trying to get their Priuses started so they can save the lebensraum, or whoops, the Earth.


What it does amount to is vindication for President Trump, who wanted to get us out of that hellish pact, the work of petty bureaucrats.  The U.S. in fact is the least bad offender compared to Europe, China, and India, and for the obvious reason that the U.S. abhors central planning.  German automakers are all in on greenhouse gas reduction, but they say companies must find ways to do this on their own, not as a function of one-size-fits-all central planning diktats.  The free market can trump anything the central planners claim they can correct.


It’s supremely ironic that the Paris Accord is now synonymous with higher emissions and more greenhouse gases.  But that’s central planning for you.  It’s not at all different from the initial claims about Obamacare as it was being sold to the public: that it would make health insurance more affordable, not less.  Funny how such results happen every time you give central planning a try.






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Posted on

PAPER: Why The Courts Are Next To Drop Bombshell About Anti-Trump Steele Dossier

PAPER: Why The Courts Are Next To Drop Bombshell About Anti-Trump Steele Dossier


by Joshua Caplan
March 27, 2018

The courts, rather than Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley and House Intelligence chair Devin Nunes, will be next to drop bombshells concerning the Steele dossier, explains  of The Federalist.

Rather, the next big information burst will likely come during the course of Aleksej Gubarev’s twin libel lawsuits, one against the dossier’s author, former British MI6 spy Steele, and the second against BuzzFeed, the online media outlet that first ran Steele’s opposition research in its entirety, and its editor-in-chief, Ben Smith.

In his lawsuits, Gubarev, who emigrated from Russia to Cyprus in 2002, claims Steele defamed him by stating that his companies, XBT Holding S.A. and its Florida-based subsidiary, Webzilla, hacked the Democratic Party by “using botnets and porn traffic to transmit viruses, plant bugs, steal data and conduct ‘altering operations.’” While Gubarev’s lawsuits focus on only a sliver of the Steele dossier, to prove his case—especially against BuzzFeed, which as a U.S. media outlet is protected from liability absent malice—Gubarev needs details.

BuzzFeed needs details as well, because it seeks to avoid liability based on a so-called “Fair Report Privilege” which, according to BuzzFeed, grants “the press (and others) the right to republish allegedly defamatory statements, . . . as long as they were made within the context of government activities.” Accordingly, to (respectively) prosecute and defend the civil claims, Gubarev and BuzzFeed need information from both those responsible for compiling and distributing the Steele dossier and those in the government who used the information.

Click here to read the full report.

Earlier this month, conservative watchdog Judicial Watch sued the Justice Department for records connecting Bruce and Nellie Ohr to Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier.

Steele has admitted in court that the discredited document contains “limited intelligence.”

Steele also admitted part of “his final December memo,” was unvetted.

“Such intelligence was not actively sought; it was merely received,” Steele added.

According to a recent WSJ report, the Obama Justice Department relied on information obtained by Steele, to spy on Trump campaign aide, Carter Page, during the final days of the 2016 presidential election.

Steele infamously compiled the discredited dossier detailing alleged sex acts performed by then-businessman Donald Trump inside a swanky Moscow hotel suite in 2013.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Posted on

Juanita Broaddrick: Media Won’t Interview Me About Clinton ‘Because I’m Not A Porn Star’

Media all over Stormy Daniels, despite the fact that they claimed ‘sex didn’t matter’ when it came to Bill Clinton. Yet, as to actual charges against Clinton of harassment and rape, the media disregarded or diminished it.

Via Fox News Insider:

A woman who accused then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton of raping her said the media is treating porn star Stormy Daniels wildly different than herself.

Sean Hannity asked Juanita Broaddrick if CNN’s Anderson Cooper – who interviewed Daniels for CBS – has called her to hear her own story of alleged sexual misconduct by a president.

Broaddrick said she tweeted at Cooper to ask why he remains silent on her case.

“There’s no comparison,” fellow Clinton accuser Paula Corbin Jones said of the coverage of the Daniels allegations versus her own and those of Broaddrick.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Posted on

California Sheriff’s Office To Publish Inmates’ Release In Pushback Against State’s ‘Sanctuary’ Law

Insane that they have to do this to try to work around nutsy California law. And the California law already violates the federal law which forbids making a state law like the one they made.

Via Fox News:

A California sheriff’s office announced Monday that it will provide public information on when inmates are released from jail — a move coming amid a growing backlash against the liberal state’s “sanctuary” laws that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The Orange County Register reported that the county’s sheriff’s department will publish a “Who’s in Jail” online database, including the date and time of inmates’ release, to help cooperate with other law enforcement agencies including Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE.)

Undersheriff Don Barnes cited California’s sanctuary legislation, which limits the instances when state and local police agencies can inform federal authorities about an illegal immigrant’s release from detention, specifically as a reason for the move.

“This is in response to SB-54 limiting our ability to communicate with federal authorities and our concern that criminals are being released to the street when there’s another avenue to safeguard the community by handing them over (to ICE for potential deportation),” Barnes said, according to the Register.

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

Posted on

CNN agape as their poll shows Trump approval jumping to 11 month high, GOP midterm hopes slowly brighten

CNN agape as their poll shows Trump approval jumping to 11 month high
I would love to have been in the CNN newsroom when these numbers came in. They’ve burned months of airtime on scandal after scandal, negative story and negative story, all in an endless quest to make the country despise Donald Trump. You’re supposed to hate him. He’s supposed to disgust you. His approval numbers are supposed to be down in the low 20s.  Heck, he was supposed to be impeached by now.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Posted on

Democrats DESPERATELY Trying To Form Own Tea Party; There’s Just One Problem …

This is both sad and hilarious.

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

………………………………… ……………………………………………………. ………………………………………………….. ……………………

In one of the most pathetic columns written in recent times, former House Rep. Steve Israel, who as a reminder stepped down from office in January, lay the Democrat’s future (or lack thereof) in the hands of the fictional “Teen Party” he envisions in his deluded head.

And no, he didn’t mean a gathering of rambunctious teens chugging on Kool-Aid and snacking on Doritos as they bond over their shared dislike of Coach Balbricker.

The former congressman meant Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School mass shooting survivor David Hogg and other teens just like him, whose energy at the disturbingly demagogic “March for Our Lives” over the weekend Israel apparently found uber inspiring.

So inspiring, in fact, it reminded him of the Tea Party that helped propel the historic wave that allowed Republicans to recapture the House in 2010:

Now, we see it again, only in hard reverse. Not a Tea Party, but a Teen Party. Not in the diatribe of pundits, but in 11-year-old Naomi Wadler’s captivation of her audience at a rally on Saturday. In the thousands of voters drawn to rallies by the energy of children too young to vote. In the hand-drawn signs and the spontaneous chants of “vote them out” that I heard at a rally in Huntington, Long Island, that attracted more than 1,000 people.  …

Um, signs like this, you mean (H/T RedState)?

“Something powerful is in the air when a discussion of ‘midterms’ at the kitchen table isn’t about school exams but about elections,” Israel continued.

He concluded by arguing that if “the Teen Party, like the Tea Party, ramps up town hall meetings, channels their energy and masses in districts that matter, vulnerable Republicans will find themselves in a perilous place — on the wrong side of energy, and maybe of history as well.”

So let me get this straight: This doofus’ plan for electoral victory entails allowing a bunch of Tide Pod-eating teenyboppers who’re ignorant of the most basic facts to rally a base of grown adults (who in an ideal world would know better) against Republicans?

I don’t mean to be so rough in my language, but these are children. The guy seriously cited the purported wisdom of an an 11-year-old to back his argument, for Pete’s sake.

While I love children and wish them the best luck on Earth, I also recognize that they’re not emotionally or intellectually mature enough to handle what awaits them in the game of politics. Especially given that the chances of their efforts engendering anything meaningful are quite low, as noted over the weekend by Carl Arbogast over at RedState.

“[T]hose same pundits are hoping that thousands of teenagers will carry the day for them. They get on television and say, ‘This is a movement that won’t get stopped.’ They’re lying to these kids,” Arbogast opined.

“That assault weapons ban some people so badly want to pass? It’s not happening. And members of Congress who vote against it will not lose. People should tell these kids the truth. They’re going to be disappointed and it’s going to be worse when they come to the realization that people like Shannon Watts and Charles Schumer were blowing smoke up their rear ends.”

Indeed.

These leftists, including Israel, are setting these kids up for a disappointment they don’t deserve. Let me tell you something. As a hardcore politics aficionado, I experience disappointment all the time. It’s part of the lifestyle.

But could kids handle this sort of disappointment? How about Hogg? He’s almost an adult, yet he frequently lashes out in profanity-ridden rants like an overly emotional fool. How would he handle learning that millions of Americans don’t see eye to eye with him?

Newsflash at former Rep. Steve Israel: These kids aren’t ready to lead your crazy movement, dude. They’re just kids.

Am I against them expressing their opinions? Not at all. But I do take umbrage to the notion that they should be recruited into a “Teen Party” to lead the Democrat Party toward the future.

Not only do I believe they still have a lot more to learn, but I strongly feel that the only “Teen Party” kids should be involved with are those that serve Kool-aid and Doritos!

Personal Note: Thanks to your incredible generosity, as well as some work I picked up on the side as a copywriter, I will be able to continue writing at Downtrend past March. Nevertheless, due to a pay cut at Downtrend.com spurred by Adolf Zuckerberg’s war on conservative thought, I still need YOUR help to keep writing here for the long-term. If interested, please check out my Patreon account here. And a sincere THANK YOU to those who’ve subscribed!

H/T Tom Shillue

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Posted on

Facebook Engineer: Users Having ‘Stupid’ Reaction to Our Quietly Taking Their Personal Data

An anonymous Facebook engineer is going viral in all the wrong ways after a writer accused him of calling users’ concerns over privacy “stupid” and saying that since they checked a box allowing the social media giant to use the data, they oughtn’t to be annoyed that the data was sold to third parties.

The email was put up on social media by Tom Warren, a senior editor at The Verge, a tech publication. Warren recently wrote an article which dealt with Android users’ phone histories being stored by Facebook.

“Facebook has been collecting call records and SMS data from Android devices for years,” Warren wrote.

“Several Twitter users have reported finding months or years of call history data in their downloadable Facebook data file. A number of Facebook users have been spooked by the recent Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal, prompting them to download all the data that Facebook stores on their account.”

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Thanks For Subscribing!

Warren also noted that users “found a similar pattern where it appears close contacts, like family members, are the only ones tracked in Facebook’s call records.”

He noted that iOS devices appear to be unaffected.

While outrage grew on social media, some wondered what all the fuss was about — like Facebook software engineers.

“Your post of fb collecting call history and sms text is pretty dirty,” the engineer supposedly told Warren

“You’re turning a messenger/fb feature into a smear campaign. The app clearly ask (sic) for permission to read these data. Your article takes stupid audience reaction and spin it as a controversy. I think that’s pretty messed up. That’s like people freaking over what they signed in an App EULA and making a big deal about it later. I am a huge fan of the verge but this article is a low blow to fb and you know it. I expected better from you.”

An EULA, for those who aren’t familiar with the parlance of the tech industry, is the “end user license agreement.” That’s the process by which you check a box at the end of a long list of legalese essentially agreeing to the terms that the app or product sets out in said list.

As we all know, everyone reads those terms very carefully and can understand them — right?

Has Facebook lost your trust?

RELATED: More Individuals Horrified, Begin Finding Everything FB Took Off Their Phones

“It’s clear even Facebook employees don’t understand why people are surprised the company even needs to collect call history and SMS data,” Watson wrote.

This is the problem when the cloistered environment of Silicon Valley meets the kind of product that Facebook is providing. As has been made clear a million times, when it comes to Facebook, you are the product. You create reams of data and can be marketed to. That’s how Facebook stays in business.

Cambridge Analytica may have put a spotlight on this, but the fact is that the social media giant has apparently been abusing this trust for quite some time now.

There is a delicate balance for any social media product like this: to remain free, it must have some way to sustain itself, and that will usually involve marketing or sharing of data. The point is for the product to remain trustworthy and upfront about its motives.

Facebook has not passed this test — and this software engineer just proved why in a major way.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Posted on

Democratic Lawmakers Introduce Bill Requiring Background Checks . . . On Ammunition Buyers

Chris Rock used to do a great bit on gun control.

The comedian joked that America doesn’t need gun control, it needs “bullet control.”

“I think all bullets should cost $5,000,” he said to laughter. “$5,000! ‘Cuz you know why? If a bullet cost $5,000, there’d be no more innocent bystanders!”

Now a pair of Democratic lawmakers are making the very same proposal — but they’re not joking.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) on Monday introduced a bill, known as the Ammunition Background Check Act of 2018, that they said will help close a “loophole” in the current law.

“Ammunition sales should be subject to the same legal requirements as firearm sales, and that includes instant background checks. … Closing this ludicrous loophole is a common-sense component of a comprehensive strategy to reduce gun violence,” Blumenthal said.

Schultz added that it is “common-sense legislation” that would close an “absurd loophole.” “Studies show it can help keep ‘bad guys with guns’ from perpetrating another mass slaughter like the one we witnessed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in my Broward County community, or the thousands of other acts of gun violence that devastate communities across the country,” she said in a statement.

The bill would require federally licensed firearms dealers to perform a background check through the National Instant Background Check System on all ammunition buyers. Two states with the most restrictive gun laws in the country — California and New York — already require background checks for ammo. Coincidentally (or not), California had 1,275 gun murders in 2015 — the most in the U.S. — and New York was sixth with 383 gun murders.

“It takes more than just a gun to take an innocent life. It also takes bullets,” said Schultz, who has an “F” rating from the National Rifle Association. “We need to do all we can to make sure neither of them ends up in the wrong hands.”

And unlike Rock, she’s not kidding.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml