Hogg Targets Iconic Gun Manufacturer After Ingraham Boycott Falls Flat

David Hogg, a senior at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, has become the face of the gun control movement in the wake of the massacre at his school on Feb. 14.

Hogg is now using his new-found media fame to mount a targeted anti-gun boycott against the financial backers of one of the most popular firearms manufacturers in America — Smith & Wesson —  according to The Washington Times.

In a series of tweets posted Tuesday afternoon, Hogg directed his 765,000 Twitter followers to boycott and sever all ties with a number of high-profile investment groups, specifically Blackrock and the Vanguard Group.

Hogg tweeted, “[email protected] and @Vanguard_Group are two of the biggest investors in gun manufacturers; if you use them, feel free to let them know. Thanks.”

Both Blackrock and Vanguard manage mutual funds that spread investors’ money to a variety of stocks, and both hold significant shares in the American Outdoor Brands Corporation, the parent company of Smith & Wesson.

According to the New York Post, Blackrock is the second-largest investor in the American Outdoor Brands as well as Vista Outdoors — another parent company that oversees some gun and ammunition manufacturers — and is the single largest institutional-investor of gun manufacturer Sturm Ruger.

Vanguard is the second largest investor in Sturm Ruger and the third largest for both American Outdoor Brands and Vista Outdoors.

Do you think this boycott effort will fall flat?

Both of the firms have been under pressure from anti-gun rights advocates to divest from the firearms industry for some time, and both have taken steps to placate the vociferous anti-gun crowd by offering funds which specifically don’t include any investments in that industry.

While some executives and investors may be concerned about becoming the target of a boycott, others may be thrilled, given the outcome of the last two major boycott efforts launched by Hogg.

In late March, Hogg launched a boycott against advertisers on Fox News host Laura Ingraham‘s program after she had criticized Hogg in a tweet. According to Newsbusters, that boycott effort appears to have backfired spectacularly.

Though Ingraham lost some of her sponsors, she did not suffer for lack of viewers. In fact, her ratings surged by 20 percent in the weeks after Hogg vindictively targeted her.

Prior to that, Hogg led the charge in demanding a boycott against the National Rifle Association, as he and other anti-gun advocates ludicrously held the organization responsible for the deadly mass shooting that took place in Parkland.

RELATED: Apple Tells Gun-Control Advocates To Get Lost with Their Outrageous Demands

According to the U.K. Daily Mail, the NRA saw a spike in new members in the weeks following the targeted campaign against them — as did other gun rights advocacy organizations — though the group declined to specify how many new members they received.

Searches on Google’s search engine for “NRA membership” rose by nearly 4,900 percent in the week following the massacre, and there was plenty of anecdotal evidence on social media as thousands of Facebook and Twitter users posted that they had joined or renewed their memberships with the NRA.

If this latest boycott effort by Hogg is anything like his first two efforts, the targeted firms should see an increase in investments and fund contributions, and may even consider expanding their holdings in the firearms industry to boot.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://conservativetribune.com

Lawmakers Recommend Clinton, Comey, Lynch, McCabe for Criminal Referrals

Republican lawmakers on Wednesday sent a slew of criminal referrals to Attorney General Jeff Sessions for a number of Obama administration officials and senior FBI employees for violations of the law in connection to the Clinton email and Trump-Russia investigations.

Specifically, they sent criminal referrals to Sessions for: former FBI Director James Comey, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, as well as FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his lover, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, for separate violations.

The criminal referrals, first reported by investigative journalist Sara Carter, were made by Rep. Ron Desantis (R-FL), a senior member of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees who is leaving the House to run for Florida governor, and nine other colleagues.

Signatories included: GOP Reps. Andy Biggs (AZ), Dave Brat (VA), Jeff Duncan (SC), Matt Gaetz (FL), Paul A. Gosar (AZ), Andy Harris (MD), Jody Hice (GA), Todd Rokita (IN), Claudia Tenney (NY), and Ted Yoho (FL).

“Because we believe that those in positions of high authority should be treated the same as every other American, we want to be sure that the potential violations of law outlined below are vetted appropriately,” said the letter.

They said Comey potentially broke the law when he chose not to seek charges against Clinton, for leaking classified memos of his conversations to President Trump to his friend Daniel Richman to give to the press, and for lying to lawmakers.

They said Clinton potentially broke the law when disguising payments to Fusion GPS, the firm that produced the Trump dossier, despite mandatory disclosures to the Federal Election Commission.

Lynch, they said, potentially broke the law when she threatened a former FBI informant, William Douglas Campbell, who had tried to come forward in 2016 with information related to the Uranium One deal that was approved in 2010.

McCabe potentially broke the law when he lied to investigators four times when questioned about a leak that he had arranged, they said.

Strzok and Page potentially violated the law by interfering in the investigation of Clinton’s private email server, they said. The letter cites a Wall Street Journal report that said their text messages to one another revealed FBI officials tried to eliminate evidence that Clinton had compromised high-level communications with then-President Obama.

“The report provides the following alarming specifics, among others: ‘Mr. Strzok texts Ms. Page to tell her that, in fact, senior officials had decided to water down the reference to President Obama to ‘another senior government official,” the criminal referral said.

Finally, the lawmakers referred all Justice Department and FBI personnel, including Comey, McCabe, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, and former Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente, for potentially breaking the law by using unverified and/or false information to obtain a surveillance warrant on former Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page.

Carter also reported that other recent documents obtained by congressional investigators suggest possible coordination by the Obama White House, the CIA, and the FBI in investigating the Trump campaign.

“According to those documents, the senior Obama officials used unsubstantiated evidence to launch allegations in the media that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election,” Carter reported.

CIA Director John Brennan had briefed Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) in August 2016, prompting Reid to send a letter to then-FBI Director James Comey asking him to investigate allegations of collusion. Reid then reportedly stayed in close touch with Comey.

472EBC7D8F55C0F9E830D37CF96376A2.Final Criminal Referral by Kristina Wong on Scribd

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

Washington, DC, considering lowering voting age to just 16 years old

Washington, D.C., is considering lowering the voting age to just 16 years old — in time for the 2020 presidential election.

What are the details?

WUSA-TV reported that D.C. City Council Member Charles Allen (D) was moved propose the measure last week after witnessing the Parkland, Florida, students’ youth-led initiative, March for Our Lives.

“At the age of 16, our society already gives young people greater legal responsibility,” Allen said, according to NBC News. “They can drive a car. They can work. Some are raising a family or helping their family make ends meet. They pay taxes. And yet, they can’t exercise their voice where it matters most — at the ballot box.”

“Two years ago, the argument that I would hear people make was, really? Have you met a 16-year-old?” Allen added. “What we’ve seen over the last several months has just completely eviscerated that argument.”

According to the report, seven of 13 council members support the measure, as well as Mayor Muriel Bowser, according to NBC News.

The measure’s supporters are attempting to set up a public hearing by June and secure a vote by year-end.

Alisha Chopra, a local 18-year-old, told USA Today that, if passed, the legislation could effect great change in the U.S.

“I think people are getting excited about this, especially with what’s going on in the nation right now in terms of youth leading social change,” she said. “So I think that people are going to be very excited about it and want to get on board.”

The nation’s voting age was last lowered — from 21 years old to 18 years old — in 1971 through the 26th Amendment after citizens argued that if a young person should be able to fight in the Vietnam War, they should be able to legally vote as well.

According to USA Today, “[W]hile cities can only extend voting rights in municipal elections, the District of Columbia is treated as a state in some cases, and can, therefore, change the voting age to allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote for President of the United States in addition to local elections.”

Congress, however, has the authority to strike down the legislation. According to the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973, Congress reserves the right to block any legislation passed by the D.C. City Council.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.theblaze.com

CNN Washes Out Its Own Role in Outing Hannity’s Legal Chat with Michael Cohen

Greg P. at Twitchy reports the attorney who pressured federal judge Kimba Wood into releasing Sean Hannity’s name is a lawyer for liberal media outlets.

According to reports from inside the courtroom, Judge Wood was ready to allow Michael Cohen to submit the name of his third client — who we now know is Sean Hannity — under seal, but an attorney for five news organizations, including CNN and the New York Times, convinced her otherwise. 

From Natasha Bertrand, The Atlantic: “Robert Balin is the attorney’s name. Thanks everyone who commented with it!”

CNN’s Shimon Prokupecz confirmed the ‘under seal’ part, but omitted that the attorney was representing his employer. Prokupecz merely tweeted: “I was in court yesterday and if it wasn’t for the attorney representing the press, Sean Hannity’s name would have been filed under seal. Judge Kimba Wood was ready to accept the name under seal, when the attorney representing the press stood up and argued successfully against it.”

Couldn’t that be because “the press” — the liberal press — wants to tear down Fox News and run around claiming they shouldn’t be defined as a “news organization”? The competitive and ideological juices are flowing all through this controversy. 

According to the New York Times, Mr. Balin does indeed represent CNN and the Times:

Robert D. Balin, a lawyer for various media outlets, including The New York Times, CNN and others, interrupted the hearing to argue that embarrassment was not a sufficient cause to withhold a client’s name, and Judge Wood agreed.

After Mr. Hannity was named, there were audible gasps from the spectators.

So all the liberal-media zone-flooding about Hannity’s lack of disclosure came in part with a lack of disclosure. Fascinating. But not unusual. These people use anonymous sources, so why wouldn’t they like to be anonymous from time to time?

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

California Tenured Professor Celebrates Barbara Bush Dying: ‘I’m Happy the Witch Is Dead’

California State University, Fresno professor Randa Jarrar celebrated former First Lady Barbara Bush passing away Tuesday evening by calling her an "amazing racist" and boasting she was "happy the witch is dead."

Jarrar, a professor in Fresno State’s Department of English, started sending out tweets celebrating Bush’s death within an hour after media outlets reported she had passed away at the age of 92 years old.

"Barbara Bush was a generous and smart and amazing racist who, along with her husband, raised a war criminal. Fuck outta here with your nice words," Jarrar tweeted.

Her now-private tweet generated a lot of controversy with over 3,000 comments, many of which were critical of her comments and called for her to be fired. Several people tagged the Twitter handles of Fresno State’s President Joseph Castro, prompting her to brag about being a "tenured professor" and about how she cannot be fired.

"sweetie i work as a tenured professor. I make 100K a year doing that. i will never be fired. i will always have people wanting to hear what i have to say. even you are one of them! <3," Jarrar tweeted.

She replied to another user: "you can try all you want. i will not be fired. and i know how much that hurts you :)."

She went on to she is "happy" knowing former President George W. Bush is  "probably really sad right now."

"Professor Randa Jarrar is an award-winning novelist, short story writer, essayist, and translator,"  Jarrar’s bio on the university’s website reads. "Her essays have appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The Utne Reader, Salon, Guernica, The Rumpus, The Sun, and others."

Jarrar continued her attack on Barbara and the Bush family, accusing them of exhibiting "genocidal ways."

"PSA: either you are against these pieces of shit and their genocidal ways or you’re part of the problem. that’s actually how simple this is. I’m happy the witch is dead. can’t wait for the rest of her family to fall to their demise the way 1.5 million iraqis have. byyyeeeeeeee," continued Jarrar in an another tweet.

This isn’t the first time Jarrar has responded without sympathy to a Republican fighting for his or her life. Last June, Jarrar tweeted, "I don’t give a single fuck" in response to tweet from Politico reporter Rachael Bade about House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R., La.) fighting for his life after he was shot in the hip.

Castro, the university’s president, sent out a statement a few hours after Jarrar’s tweets, which have since been made private and only viewable to only her followers, went viral. Castro distanced the university from her comments, saying the tweets were "made as a private citizen, not as a representative of Fresno State."

"Professor Jarrar’s expressed personal views and commentary are obviously contrary to the core values of our University, which include respect and empathy for individuals with divergent points of view, and a sincere commitment to the mutual understanding and progress," the statement said.

Bush, who had been battling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart problems in recent years, was the wife of the 41st president, George H.W. Bush, and mother of the 43rd, George W. Bush, according to Reuters.

The Bushes had six children. A daughter, Robin, died of leukemia in 1953 at age 3. Barbara Bush’s hair began to turn prematurely white after the shock of the girl’s death. In addition to George W. and Jeb, the other Bush children were sons Neil and Marvin and daughter Dorothy.

The Bushes married on Jan. 6, 1945, and Barbara set up households in numerous cities as her husband moved from being a Texas oilman to being a member of Congress, Republican Party leader, U.S. envoy to China and the United Nations and head of the CIA.

The post California Tenured Professor Celebrates Barbara Bush Dying: ‘I’m Happy the Witch Is Dead’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Fresno State Professor Who Celebrated Barbara Bush’s Death on Leave from Spring Classes

Fresno State Professor Who Celebrated Barbara Bush’s Death on Leave from Spring Classes



Fresno State Professor Randa Jarrar has requested leave from her teaching duties this spring, according to her Twitter account and information provided to Breitbart News by the university.

Jarrar, a professor of English at Fresno State, is facing quite the backlash after she published several tweets celebrating the death of former First Lady Barbara Bush.

“Barbara Bush was a generous and smart and amazing racist who, along with her husband, raised a war criminal. F**k outta here with your nice words,” Jarrar tweeted on Tuesday.

In a separate tweet, Jarrar said that the news made her “happy” because Barbara Bush’s death likely made George W. Bush upset.

After Jarrar’s tweet invoked a tidal wave of responses, the professor bragged that she could never be fired because she had tenure.

“Sweetie i work as a tenured professor,” she tweeted at one user. “I make 100K a year doing that. i will never be fired. i will always have people wanting to hear what i have to say. even you are one of them!”

Following the backlash, Jarrar set her Twitter account to private. She edited her Twitter biography to add the line: “currently on leave from Fresno State.”

In a comment to Breitbart News, Fresno State said that Professor Jarrar has “requested a leave” for the spring semester and will not be teaching classes.

In a public statement, Fresno State President Joseph Castro said that he was concerned by the remarks Jarrar made about Bush on Twitter.

On behalf of Fresno State, I extend my deepest condolences to the Bush family on the loss of our former First Lady, Barbara Bush. We share the deep concerns expressed by others over the personal comments made today by professor Randa Jarrar, a professor in the English Department at Fresno State.

Her statements were made as a private citizen, not as a representative at Fresno State.

Professor Jarrar’s expressed personal views and commentary are obviously contrary to the core values of our University, which include respect and empathy for individuals with divergent points of view, and a sincere commitment to mutual understanding and progress.

This is not the first incident at Fresno State featuring a crazed professor. In November, Fresno State Professor Gregory Thatcher was forced by a court to pay a $17,000 fine after he was caught on camera erasing the chalk messages of a pro-life student group.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.breitbart.com

America’s Third Civil War began November 8, 2016

America’s Third Civil War began November 8, 2016
America’s First Civil War began on July 4, 1776 with the ratification of the Colonies’ Declaration of Independence.  An international and internecine war followed.

On the American Revolutionaries side of the battlefield stood the irregular Militia from various states and the regular Continentals – the originating nucleus of today’s United States Army.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Stephanopoulos Whines to Comey About Costing Hillary the Election

Recapping his Sunday night interview with former FBI Director James Comey on Monday’s Good Morning America, ABC anchor and former Clinton White House political operative George Stephanopoulos complained that the ex-Bureau chief’s decision to re-open the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation in October of 2016 cost the Democrat the election.

In a report at the top of the morning show, Stephanopoulos highlighted how he grilled Comey about the Clinton investigation: “Comey explains his thinking on the October surprise that Hillary Clinton believes cost her the White House. Why did he reveal he was re-opening the Clinton e-mail investigation?”

 

 

The host fretted: “You could try to find out first whether or not they were, indeed, relevant. Whether there was evidence there of a crime.” Comey replied: “My view is that would be a potentially deeply irresponsible and dangerous thing to do.” Stephanopoulos pleaded: “But we don’t know what’s in it.” Comey explained: “We know there are hundreds of thousands of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails there, that’s an affirmative act of concealment.”

Stephanopoulos then ominously told viewers: “What the public doesn’t know at the time is that the FBI is actively investigating the Trump campaign, and whether members were working with the Russians to influence the election.”

Turning back to Comey, the anchor scolded: “Your critics say this is a clear, clear, clear double standard. You revealed information about Hillary Clinton. You concealed information about Donald Trump. That elected Donald Trump.”

Even though Comey spent much of the hour-long interview personally attacking President Trump, even he admitted that it would have been “brutally unfair” to say anything about the investigation into the Trump campaign at the time because “we were not investigating Donald Trump” and “We had just started the investigation, didn’t know whether we had anything.”

During the ABC News special Sunday night, Stephanopoulos also bemoaned: “And as this heated campaign goes down to the wire, Comey closes the Clinton investigation for a second time. But to the Clinton campaign, the damage has been done.”

Sympathizing with Clinton, Stephanopoulos pressed Comey: “If she were sitting right here today, what would you tell her?” Comey objected to Clinton’s assertion in her book that he “shivved” her: “I mean, that sounds like I was trying to knife somebody, I was out to get her.”

Stephanopoulos followed up: “If you knew that letter would elect Donald Trump, you’d still send it?” Comey assured him: “I would. Down that path lies the death of the FBI as an independent force in American life. If I ever start considering whose political fortunes will be affected by a decision, we’re done.”

While Stephanopoulos interrogated Comey when it came to his treatment of Hillary Clinton, the former Clinton hack had no problem teeing up the former FBI director to repeatedly slam Trump and even allowed him to give a “free political commercial” against the President.

Here is a transcript of the April 16 exchange aired on Monday’s GMA:

7:04 AM ET

(…)

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Comey explains his thinking on the October surprise that Hillary Clinton believes cost her the White House. Why did he reveal he was re-opening the Clinton e-mail investigation?

HILLARY CLINTON: We knew about it is, I assume, when you knew about it.

STEPHANOPOULOS: He says he had no choice after additional e-mails were found on the computer of Anthony Weiner, husband of one of Clinton’s top aides.

You could try to find out first whether or not they were, indeed, relevant. Whether there was evidence there of a crime.

JAMES COMEY: Well, maybe. And maybe another director might have done that. My view is that would be a potentially deeply irresponsible and dangerous thing to do.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But we don’t know what’s in it.

COMEY: We know there are hundreds of thousands of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails there, that’s an affirmative act of concealment.

STEPHANOPOULOS: What the public doesn’t know at the time is that the FBI is actively investigating the Trump campaign, and whether members were working with the Russians to influence the election.

Your critics say this is a clear, clear, clear double standard. You revealed information about Hillary Clinton. You concealed information about Donald Trump. That elected Donald Trump.

COMEY: Take a step back and stare at the two cases and the posture they were in. The Hillary Clinton e-mail case was public and the counterintelligence investigation was trying to figure out whether a small group of people, not Donald Trump, we were not investigating Donald Trump –  whether this small group of Americans was coordinating anything with the Russians. We had just started the investigation, didn’t know whether we had anything. So it would have been brutally unfair to those people to talk about it and it would have jeopardized the investigation.

(…)

Here is an excerpt of the exchange aired during the Sunday ABC special:

10:22 PM ET

(…)

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And as this heated campaign goes down to the wire, Comey closes the Clinton investigation for a second time. But to the Clinton campaign, the damage has been done.

HILLARY CLINTON: If the election had been on October 27th, I’d be your president.

STEPHANOPOULOS: If she were sitting right here today, what would you tell her?

JAMES COMEY: As Hillary Clinton wrote in her book, I “shivved” her? I mean, that sounds like I was trying to knife somebody, I was out to get her. And it’s illustration of our polarization here that you’ve got the Trump camp, which I guess thinks I was trying to save Hillary Clinton. I would hope both camps will read this and, I hope, see a deeply flawed human surrounded by other flawed humans trying to make decisions with an eye, not on politics, but on those higher values.

STEPHANOPOULOS: If you knew that letter would elect Donald Trump, you’d still send it?

COMEY: I would. Down that path lies the death of the FBI as an independent force in American life. If I ever start considering whose political fortunes will be affected by a decision, we’re done. We’re just another player in the tribal battle.

(…)

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Feminists Attack Tomi Lahren’s Appearance

If there is one thing consistent about modern feminists, it is their blatant hypocrisy. These alleged warriors for gender equality claim it’s sexist and wrong to attack a woman’s appearance, for example, unless that woman happens to hold some conservative views.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml