On Father’s Day, Kamala Harris Compares Military Dads to Illegal Aliens and Criminals

Democratic Party presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (CA) posted Father’s Day greetings to Twitter on Sunday comparing deployed military fathers who are away from their children on Father’s Day to illegal aliens and accused criminals.

Harris listed them in presumed order of dearness to her heart, putting US military dads third behind first-in-her heart illegal aliens and accused criminals who can’t make bail.

“Today I’m thinking of the fathers who can’t be with their children because they were ripped from their sons and daughters at the border. The fathers who can’t celebrate today because they can’t afford bail. The fathers who are deployed. Don’t forget them. #FathersDay”

Your Democratic Party, America.

Happy Father’s Day.

(Note: Harris posted Happy Father’s Day greetings to her husband, Douglas Emhoff, earlier Sunday.)

The post On Father’s Day, Kamala Harris Compares Military Dads to Illegal Aliens and Criminals appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Why liberal Jews are really not informed

Is it any wonder that most American Jews who do not read any conservative news outlets are completely clueless about the perfidy of the Democrat Party and its leftist partners? At the Jewish Week, one learns that “Ilhan Omar is Joining [the] Newly Formed Black-Jewish Congressional Caucus.”  That is like saying that the fox has deigned to come to the chicken coop for a sit-down chat before consuming the hapless fowl. 

The Black-Jewish Caucus is being convened by the American Jewish Committee (AJC).  A little background on the AJC is in order. In 2013 Ronn Torossian revealed that 

The American Jewish Committee (AJC)… claims to be ‘strictly non-partisan’ – yet cannot be non-partisan when they continually support a failed peace process and a two-state solution. In 2004, the leadership of the AJC met with Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat’s national security adviser, Jibril Rajoub, and the AJC leader, David Harris, publicly urged Israel to use the ‘road map’ to get to ‘peace.’

More recently, Daniel Greenfield asserts that “[t]he American Jewish Congress, [is] a liberal group that, despite its name, represents Jews no more than any of the other alphabet soup non-profits with a ‘J’ thrown in there [.]” His conclusion is that “the struggle between Jews and the anti-Jewish Left goes on.”

According to the Jewish Week the newly formed caucus includes “Reps. Brenda Lawrence, D-Mich, Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., Will Hurd, R-Texas and John Lewis, D-Ga., a revered veteran of the 1960s civil rights movement.” While Lewis was certainly active in the 1960s civil rights movement, it behooves the writer to shed light on Lewis’ connections to the following: 

In 1969, Lewis was listed as a sponsor of the GI Civil Liberties Defense Committee, an anti-U.S. military organization dominated by the Socialist Workers Party.  In May 1973 Lewis was listed as a sponsor of . . . the National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, a Communist Party USA front group that grew out of the movement to free the incarcerated Marxist revolutionary and Black Panther ally Angela Davis.

In October 2008, Lewis accused Republican presidential candidate John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, of promoting racism in their campaign against Democratic nominee Barack Obama. ‘What I am seeing reminds me too much of another destructive period in American history,’ Lewis said in a statement. ‘Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division, and there is no need for this hostility in our political discourse.’

That Obama turned out to be good friends with known anti-Semites such as Edward Said, Rashid Khalidi and Linda Sarsour was simply ignored.

Right on cue, “the Minnesota Democrat’s spokesman, Jeremy Slevin, confirmed to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that [Omar] is planning to join the group.”  Yet, Minnesota is becoming ground zero for terrorist recruiting.  In fact, “Federal data show people leave or attempt to leave Minneapolis in hopes to join Islamic terrorist networks abroad more than any other city in the U.S.  So big is the problem that Minnesota U.S. attorney general Andrew Lugar said in 2015 that ‘Minnesota has a terror recruiting problem.’” So instead of sanctioning Omar for her raving anti-Semitism, the Jewish Congressional Democrats have decided to join her.

Actually, anti-Semitism is hardly a priority at this caucus since Omar is concerned about “the common threat of white nationalism faced by Muslim, Black and Jewish Americans.” Omar and Rep. Jan Schakowsky, (D-Ill) have decided to confront the “white supremacy that threatens both Jews and Blacks.”  According to the Jewish Press, an orthodox, politically conservative-leaning paper, “Schakowsky “is among the most Progressive members of Congress and is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.” She has called senior-editor-at-large for Breitbart News Joel Pollak a “Jewish, Orthodox Tea Party Republican.”

As writer David Israel has sardonically asserted “So, all in all, a fine pick to represent U.S. Jewish politicians in a solidarity group with Congresswoman Omar, whose command of classic anti-Semitism is impressive for an east-African Muslim.”

What is puzzling is that Zeldin is involved in this caucus.  In the past he and Omar have butted heads in their tweets when Zeldin stated: “Those poor innocent ISIS fighters & Palestinian terrorists right? Give me a break! That’s a problem no matter your religion or gender Ilhan. Your anti-Semitic & anti-Israel hate is strong & wrong & those terrorists have US blood on their hands as well.”

Omar responded with “Don’t mind him, he is just waking up to the reality of having Muslim women as colleagues who know how to stand up to bullies! It’s gonna be fun watching him lose his marbles.”

Although there were hyperlinks in the Jewish News paper that alluded to Omar’s anti-Semitism, would a reader be aware that Omar is a strong supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement which seeks to destroy Israel? Would the average reader of the Jewish News know that “[i]n February 2019, Omar was scheduled to speak at a Florida event sponsored by Islamic Relief USA (IRUSA), the American branch of an international organization that has been designated as a terror financier by the governments of the United Arab Emirates and Israel?”

Moreover, “[i]n March 2019 in Los Angeles, Omar was the keynote speaker at a Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) benefit event titled ‘Advancing Justice, Empowering Valley Muslims.’ Sharing the stage with Omar was CAIR-Florida executive director Hassan Shibly, who rejects the notion that Hezbollah and Hamas are terrorist organizations. At the same event, Omar said: ’CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people [the 9/11 terrorists] did something, and that all of us [Muslim civilians] were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.’ (In fact, CAIR was founded in 1994, not 2001.)”  The manipulation of facts is not surprising given that Omar’s Congressional buddy Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez maintains that “there’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

Omar has used anti-Semitic tropes about Jewish influence and money. In fact, the Jewish Press newspaper highlights that Omar has emphatically stated that “just to be clear, [her] endorsement of the caucus and willingness to unite our communities against the threats of White supremacy isn’t an endorsement of Zeldin’s bigotry.” 

Lastly, the article asserts that “[t]he American Jewish Committee said it hoped being part of the caucus ‘will sensitize Rep. Omar to the importance, history and achievements of Black-Jewish relations in our country.'” In her best smarmy tone, Omar tweeted that ’my hope here is that Zeldin can learn and grow.’

Additionally, comes the most recent news that Ilhan Omar has most likely committed a remarkable number of  felonies due to her fraudulent 2009-2017 marriage. Michelle Malkin has underscored this and pointedly asks if it is time to get the federal IRS officials involved.   

As Valerie Sobel so eloquently stresses in her “Dear Jewish-American Leftists: It’s Time for a Talk,” Jews must come to understand that the Democrat Party does not serve the interests of American Jewry. A vote for a Democrat is a vote “for a party that morally equates Israel to terror groups and Islamic countries of horrendous human rights abuses.” The Democrat Party is accepting of the anti-Semitism of Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.  How can anyone support a party that does this? Abe Greenwald amplifies this when he writes:

Disease is reversible — rot isn’t. Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib brought the disease of anti-Semitism into the upper echelons of the Democratic Party when they were elected in November. The party could have fought the disease. It chose instead to nurture it. And that’s when the irreversible rot set in.

This caucus is a sham, a set-up and a feel-good exercise.  Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding himself.  The fox is hungry and it will consume its prey.

Photo credit: Lorie Shaull

Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com

Is it any wonder that most American Jews who do not read any conservative news outlets are completely clueless about the perfidy of the Democrat Party and its leftist partners? At the Jewish Week, one learns that “Ilhan Omar is Joining [the] Newly Formed Black-Jewish Congressional Caucus.”  That is like saying that the fox has deigned to come to the chicken coop for a sit-down chat before consuming the hapless fowl. 

The Black-Jewish Caucus is being convened by the American Jewish Committee (AJC).  A little background on the AJC is in order. In 2013 Ronn Torossian revealed that 

The American Jewish Committee (AJC)… claims to be ‘strictly non-partisan’ – yet cannot be non-partisan when they continually support a failed peace process and a two-state solution. In 2004, the leadership of the AJC met with Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat’s national security adviser, Jibril Rajoub, and the AJC leader, David Harris, publicly urged Israel to use the ‘road map’ to get to ‘peace.’

More recently, Daniel Greenfield asserts that “[t]he American Jewish Congress, [is] a liberal group that, despite its name, represents Jews no more than any of the other alphabet soup non-profits with a ‘J’ thrown in there [.]” His conclusion is that “the struggle between Jews and the anti-Jewish Left goes on.”

According to the Jewish Week the newly formed caucus includes “Reps. Brenda Lawrence, D-Mich, Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., Will Hurd, R-Texas and John Lewis, D-Ga., a revered veteran of the 1960s civil rights movement.” While Lewis was certainly active in the 1960s civil rights movement, it behooves the writer to shed light on Lewis’ connections to the following: 

In 1969, Lewis was listed as a sponsor of the GI Civil Liberties Defense Committee, an anti-U.S. military organization dominated by the Socialist Workers Party.  In May 1973 Lewis was listed as a sponsor of . . . the National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, a Communist Party USA front group that grew out of the movement to free the incarcerated Marxist revolutionary and Black Panther ally Angela Davis.

In October 2008, Lewis accused Republican presidential candidate John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, of promoting racism in their campaign against Democratic nominee Barack Obama. ‘What I am seeing reminds me too much of another destructive period in American history,’ Lewis said in a statement. ‘Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division, and there is no need for this hostility in our political discourse.’

That Obama turned out to be good friends with known anti-Semites such as Edward Said, Rashid Khalidi and Linda Sarsour was simply ignored.

Right on cue, “the Minnesota Democrat’s spokesman, Jeremy Slevin, confirmed to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that [Omar] is planning to join the group.”  Yet, Minnesota is becoming ground zero for terrorist recruiting.  In fact, “Federal data show people leave or attempt to leave Minneapolis in hopes to join Islamic terrorist networks abroad more than any other city in the U.S.  So big is the problem that Minnesota U.S. attorney general Andrew Lugar said in 2015 that ‘Minnesota has a terror recruiting problem.’” So instead of sanctioning Omar for her raving anti-Semitism, the Jewish Congressional Democrats have decided to join her.

Actually, anti-Semitism is hardly a priority at this caucus since Omar is concerned about “the common threat of white nationalism faced by Muslim, Black and Jewish Americans.” Omar and Rep. Jan Schakowsky, (D-Ill) have decided to confront the “white supremacy that threatens both Jews and Blacks.”  According to the Jewish Press, an orthodox, politically conservative-leaning paper, “Schakowsky “is among the most Progressive members of Congress and is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.” She has called senior-editor-at-large for Breitbart News Joel Pollak a “Jewish, Orthodox Tea Party Republican.”

As writer David Israel has sardonically asserted “So, all in all, a fine pick to represent U.S. Jewish politicians in a solidarity group with Congresswoman Omar, whose command of classic anti-Semitism is impressive for an east-African Muslim.”

What is puzzling is that Zeldin is involved in this caucus.  In the past he and Omar have butted heads in their tweets when Zeldin stated: “Those poor innocent ISIS fighters & Palestinian terrorists right? Give me a break! That’s a problem no matter your religion or gender Ilhan. Your anti-Semitic & anti-Israel hate is strong & wrong & those terrorists have US blood on their hands as well.”

Omar responded with “Don’t mind him, he is just waking up to the reality of having Muslim women as colleagues who know how to stand up to bullies! It’s gonna be fun watching him lose his marbles.”

Although there were hyperlinks in the Jewish News paper that alluded to Omar’s anti-Semitism, would a reader be aware that Omar is a strong supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement which seeks to destroy Israel? Would the average reader of the Jewish News know that “[i]n February 2019, Omar was scheduled to speak at a Florida event sponsored by Islamic Relief USA (IRUSA), the American branch of an international organization that has been designated as a terror financier by the governments of the United Arab Emirates and Israel?”

Moreover, “[i]n March 2019 in Los Angeles, Omar was the keynote speaker at a Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) benefit event titled ‘Advancing Justice, Empowering Valley Muslims.’ Sharing the stage with Omar was CAIR-Florida executive director Hassan Shibly, who rejects the notion that Hezbollah and Hamas are terrorist organizations. At the same event, Omar said: ’CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people [the 9/11 terrorists] did something, and that all of us [Muslim civilians] were starting to lose access to our civil liberties.’ (In fact, CAIR was founded in 1994, not 2001.)”  The manipulation of facts is not surprising given that Omar’s Congressional buddy Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez maintains that “there’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

Omar has used anti-Semitic tropes about Jewish influence and money. In fact, the Jewish Press newspaper highlights that Omar has emphatically stated that “just to be clear, [her] endorsement of the caucus and willingness to unite our communities against the threats of White supremacy isn’t an endorsement of Zeldin’s bigotry.” 

Lastly, the article asserts that “[t]he American Jewish Committee said it hoped being part of the caucus ‘will sensitize Rep. Omar to the importance, history and achievements of Black-Jewish relations in our country.'” In her best smarmy tone, Omar tweeted that ’my hope here is that Zeldin can learn and grow.’

Additionally, comes the most recent news that Ilhan Omar has most likely committed a remarkable number of  felonies due to her fraudulent 2009-2017 marriage. Michelle Malkin has underscored this and pointedly asks if it is time to get the federal IRS officials involved.   

As Valerie Sobel so eloquently stresses in her “Dear Jewish-American Leftists: It’s Time for a Talk,” Jews must come to understand that the Democrat Party does not serve the interests of American Jewry. A vote for a Democrat is a vote “for a party that morally equates Israel to terror groups and Islamic countries of horrendous human rights abuses.” The Democrat Party is accepting of the anti-Semitism of Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib.  How can anyone support a party that does this? Abe Greenwald amplifies this when he writes:

Disease is reversible — rot isn’t. Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib brought the disease of anti-Semitism into the upper echelons of the Democratic Party when they were elected in November. The party could have fought the disease. It chose instead to nurture it. And that’s when the irreversible rot set in.

This caucus is a sham, a set-up and a feel-good exercise.  Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluding himself.  The fox is hungry and it will consume its prey.

Photo credit: Lorie Shaull

Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

“This Was a Global Effort to Take Trump Down” – George Papadopoulos: Obama State Department Prodded Foreign Governments to Spy on Trump Campaign (VIDEO)

Former Trump campaign advisor George Papadolpoulos joined Jeanine Pirro on Saturday to discuss his latest book and the ongoing investigation into the Obama Spygate scandal.

President Obama used his administration and all of the power of the US government to spy on candidate Trump and then his Transition Team during and after the 2016 election.

George Papadopoulos told Judge Jeanine that Italy was already investigating Joseph Misfud and the Italian intel community’s role in spying on the Trump campaign.

Papadopoulos said it was all being run from the Obama State Department.

Papadopoulos: This was a global effort to take Trump down… Absolutely, I believe all these foreign governments were being prodded by the State Department to essentially weaponize their intel agencies against us. That’s why you saw many Trump associates who were abroad being spied on. And, hopefully the president did bring this up during his last visit to the UK. Cause the UK was heavily involved in this and this should be called out to the light right now.

Via Justice with Judge Jeanine:

The post “This Was a Global Effort to Take Trump Down” – George Papadopoulos: Obama State Department Prodded Foreign Governments to Spy on Trump Campaign (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Legal Insurrection’s Thread Explains The Horrible Things Oberlin College Did To Gibson’s Bakery

If you wondered why Oberlin got smacked with such compensatory and punitive damages when they went after Gibson’s Bakery and accused them of being racist to try to put them out of business, this thread from Legal Insurrection explains in great detail how pervasive the effort of the college was against the business and how […]

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.weaselzippers.us

This Father’s Day, Thank Dad for His Hard Work

Dads are sometimes labeled lazy, but they don’t deserve to be, a new research brief from the Institute for Family Studies argues.

In the past several years, both entertainment media and the think-piece-industrial complex have tended to paint a not-so-friendly pictures of dads. Moms are said to be suffering under "second-shift motherhood," while the "working dad" commands less and less respect, thanks to the perception that he does not pull his weight.

But is every dad really a shiftless Homer Simpson? Not quite, according to new work by IFS research fellow Robert VerBruggen. In honor of Father’s Day, he looked at data from the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), a time diary study that tracks how Americans spend our days.

"Among married couples living together with kids, if anything, it’s dads who do more work in total—adding up paid work, housework, child care, and even shopping," VerBruggen wrote. "Moms do work more in some specific circumstances, but the data acquit fathers as a group of the slacking charges so frequently leveled against them."

To reach this conclusion, VerBruggen looked at the behaviors of respondents to the ATUS who were married, with kids, and living with their spouse. Combining data on how much time parents report spending at work, doing household chores, and caring for kids shows that in the aggregate men outpace women. Specifically, dads do about 59 hours of work per week, while moms do about 55.

Part of this finding is a function of difference between the two groups—if moms are more likely to stay home and work less, and dads go to the office, that could explain the gap. But VerBruggen compared working moms and dads apples-to-apples and found that in all but one configuration, dad put in more time.

The above chart shows that when mom and dad both work—even when they both work full-time—dad works slightly more. Only in one situation (to be discussed below) do dads do less work: when they are staying at home, while their wives work full-time.

It is worth emphasizing that VerBruggen looked only at married different-sex couples with kids. These data do not, for example, cover the one-third of children living with a single mother; they also do not cover same-sex couples, who represent a small fraction of all married couples but tend to divide responsibilities up differently.

That said, we can understand why married heterosexual men work more in toto by breaking down work activities. Using VerBruggen’s data (which he provided to the Free Beacon), we can look at three broad categories: employment, household chores, and childcare.

The underlying trend should be unsurprising: Men do less work at home, but more on the job, and so do more work overall. Some point to this as evidence of gender inequity, with women kept at home and men out in the workplace. But VerBruggen thinks that much of this gap is explained by preference, pointing to surveys finding that women generally prefer either no or only part-time work, and evidence that such disparities exist even in highly gender-equitable countries like Sweden. What is more, even if preferences do not adequately explain the gap (and systemic factors are at play), it would only be fair to call dads lazy if labor force work is less strenuous or valuable than household work, a claim few would agree with.

The gender labor gap has persisted even as the American labor/household division has become more gender-equitable. According to the Pew Research Center, the number of dual-income families has risen from 49 percent in 1970 to 66 percent in 2016 (VerBruggen’s previous research has explored the class composition of these new working moms).

But the gap has shrunk some: Pew found that dads today spend 2.5 times longer on housework and 3.2 times longer on childcare than they did in 1965. In other words, dads have taken on more household responsibilities while still doing the lion’s share of the job-market work, a reality which helps explain why they do the most work in total.

What about those men who stay at home? VerBruggen specifically isolated respondents to the ATUS who both did not work and were not disabled. His finding replicates the conclusions of political demographer Nicholas Eberstadt’s monograph Men Without Work, which finds that men out of the labor force spend substantially less time on childcare and household chores than their female counterparts. What is more, the number of these men has been steadily growing over the past several decades.

It is not clear why this is. As Eberstadt recently argued, we do not even really have the numbers needed to tell us. And there is an open debate about why those men have dropped out of the labor force, whether they can be induced back in, and why they seem so reticent to take up household labor.

But while this share of the population is growing, it still remains a distinct minority. Most dads—at least in married families—work, and in fact do the most work on average. So, VerBruggen concludes, "we should stop whining about dads as a group not doing their share of the work their families depend upon—because that’s not true."

The post This Father’s Day, Thank Dad for His Hard Work appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

How Convenient! — Christopher Wray’s Corrupt FBI ‘Loses’ Notes from Meeting Where Corrupt Cop Peter Strzok was Told CHINA was Hacking Hillary’s Emails

Corrupt Deep State FBI has misplaced emails that would prove that Peter Strzok was lying to Congress last year about knowing about Hillary Clinton’s emails being hacked by China.  Imagine that!

Last year representative Louie Gohmert from Texas interviewed corrupt cop Peter Strzok before Congress  about whether he remembered anyone mentioning that China was hacking Hillary Clinton’s emails.  Strzok lied and said he didn’t remember which led Gohmert to call out his lying, especially about his affair with Lisa Page.  Gohmert said –

How many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her about Lisa Page?

The point that Gohmert was trying to make was that the FBI knew that China was hacking Hillary’s emails but ignored it.  Instead the FBI selectively addressed whether Russia was hacking Hillary’s emails and used this story to make up the fake Trump – Russia collusion narrative.

This past week Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch released information related to China spying on the US.  Fitton says in the video below at the 3 minute mark –

Take this as an educated guess that the notes [lost by the FBI] reference a discussion and a warning given by the IG of the Intelligence community to Peter Strzok who’s running the investigation effectively for the FBI at the time that the Clinton’s email system, namely Hillary Clinton’s email server had likely been hacked in some way by the Chinese.  In a way that allowed them to get a copy of all the emails that were being sent and received.

The timing is, according to Louie Gohmert, about the same time, because he says the meeting took place in 2015.  And sure enough, the meeting that we’re referencing here was in August of 2015.  And Gohmert exposed that the investigator advises Strzok of an anomaly of Hillary Clinton’s emails going to the private server.  Forensic analysis found out that all those emails except four of the 30,000 were going to an address that was not on her distribution list.  It was later reported that it was a Chinese state owned company that hacked Clinton’s email server.

The ICIG referred the Clinton email investigation to the FBI on July 6, 2015, just under a month before the meeting for which the notes were lost.

So the FBI has lost the notes from 2015 that show that dirty cop Peter Strzok, who oversaw Hillary’s email investigation, was notified that China was spying on Hillary.  Corrupt cop Christopher Wray’s FBI does not want the American public to see these notes and therefore his FBI is now saying that the notes are conveniently lost.

The fact that the FBI would ignore China spying on Hillary’s emails was material to the Spygate story.  The FBI didn’t want to look into spying on Americans, they wanted to exonerate Hillary Clinton and go on to frame candidate and President Trump on bogus Russia collusion lies.

Will the Deep State ever be cleaned up and brought to justice?

 

The post How Convenient! — Christopher Wray’s Corrupt FBI ‘Loses’ Notes from Meeting Where Corrupt Cop Peter Strzok was Told CHINA was Hacking Hillary’s Emails appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Robert Mueller: A Scary and Mendacious Man

Robert Mueller’s troublesome, unethical, and corrupt FBI career prior to his appointment as the special counsel on the Trump-Russia Collusion investigation deserves a serious vetting.  I provide here two points of reference: a monograph by sitting congressman and former Texas State Court judge Louie Gohmert titled “Robert Mueller: Unmasked” and a book by Louisiana attorney and sitting Louisiana state senator John Milkovich titled Robert Mueller: Errand Boy for the New World Order.

Congressman Gohmert’s 48-page monograph is a discussion of a “long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.  He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone.”  Gohmert focuses on 18 examples, including: 

  • Collusion with Boston mobster Whitey Bulger in criminality and framing innocent men for murder that resulted eventually in the release of innocent parties and 100 million dollars in compensation for for DOJ Boston Office misconduct. 
  • The FBI with Mueller as director harassed and hounded Congressman Curt Weldon in revenge for criticizing FBI failures related to 9-11.
  • Dishonest prosecutions of Senator Ted Stevens.
  • Prosecutorial abuses in the anthrax murder investigations post 9-11, producing one suicide and one award of 6.8 million dollars to the other innocent target.  
  • Mueller’s unethical acceptance of the special prosecutor position when he was conflicted by his longtime personal and professional relationship with James Comey.
  • Mueller hired extremely partisan, biased, and conflicted attorneys for his special counsel team. 
  • Mueller’s investigation ignored that FISA applications evidence presented to justify warrants to surveil Trump associates were not verified and thus a fraud on the court and illegal.

Louisiana State Senator John Milkovich

Milkovich’s book, Robert Mueller: Errand Boy for the New World Order (2018), recounts Robert Mueller’s history of prosecutorial misconduct before his appointment as special counsel in the Trump matter.   

Mr. Milkovich: “Mueller has left his imprint on some of the most notorious episodes of government wrongdoing of the last thirty years.”  Mr. Milkovich is and was assiduous in his research and provides almost 400 endnotes and more than 125 items of bibliography as reference sources for his 165-page self-published book.  When I asked him about the tough calls, he pointed to the sources and compelling evidence.   

Mueller misconduct and his position in the DOJ/FBI:

  1. 9-11-2001 — FBI Director Failure of the FBI to investigate suspicious characters reported to the FBI in the fall of 2000 by Dr. David Graham, former Air Force officer and dentist friend of Mr. Milkovich, who suspected that the men were planning a terrorist attack on Barksdale Air Force Base, home for a Nuclear B52H Air Wing.  Dr. Graham reported his concerns to the local FBI office and was “stunned and outraged” in September 2001 when he saw after 9-11 that two of the men were in the group of 9-11 terrorist hijackers.  Dr. Graham protested to the FBI, was rebuffed, raised a political ruckus, threatened to write a book, and shortly thereafter was poisoned but survived with severe injuries and disability.  During his treatment at two medical facilities, FBI agents appeared and encouraged physicians to let Dr. Graham die because they said he was mentally ill and suicidal.  
  2. Boston Mob 1984 — Asst. U.S. Attorney and Acting U.S. Attorney Boston Providing cover for the Whitey Bulger Winter Hill  Boston gang that committed murders and, of course, other crimes.  The FBI framed four men, who were convicted and incarcerated for murder.  The FBI was found culpable, and more than $100 million was awarded in compensation to the injured parties.     
  3. Pan Am 103 1988–2001 — Chief of the Criminal Justice Division of the DOJ Was in charge of the investigation of the 1988 Pan Am 103 Lockerbie plane bombing killed 258 passengers and 11 on the ground.  Army major Charles McKee, who headed a Middle East hostage rescue team, was returning to the U.S. on Pan Am 103 with evidence to expose CIA-sponsored criminal activity.   After the plane was destroyed, Mr. Mueller supervised an army of FBI agents on the investigation, and finally, 12 years later, the case went to trial by a panel of Scottish judges.  Two Libyans were tried for murder; Al Amin Fhima was found not guilty, and Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was found guilty, sentenced to 20 years.  Many references by Mr. Milkovich provide a case that asserts that the FBI’s incompetent investigation failed to bring to justice Ahmed Jibril, the terrorist who arranged to plant the bomb, and others, including CIA agents, who were complicit in the bombing order to eliminate Major McKee.      
  4. BCCI 1991,92 — Chief of the FBI Criminal Justice Division Mr. Mueller was actively and energetically involved in providing cover for the criminal malfeasance and perfidy by officials of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), cover-ups for black ops, money-laundering, and financing of international criminal activities.  Mr. Mueller and the FBI interfered with the investigation by Manhattan district attorney Robert Morgenthau.   
  5. Ruby Ridge 1992 — Chief of the FBI Criminal Division The FBI tried to get Randy Weaver to be an undercover informant on separatist groups in Idaho, but he was not cooperative.  Then federal agents (Marshals and what the FBI claimed to be a hostage rescue team) surrounded his isolated cabin in the mountains, and there was a 11-day siege, punctuated by a killing of Weaver’s wife from cover while she stood on a porch holding a baby.  In addition, the son was shot in the back with a machine gun, running from the gunfire.  Mueller objected publicly to anyone who would criticize the FBI conduct.
  6. 9-11-2001 — FBI Director Mueller was named FBI director one week before 9-11-2001, and his conduct and actions related to the catastrophe are another indication of his corrupt nature.  Milkovich makes the case that not only did Mueller arrange to evacuate Saudis after 9-11, but he obstructed, covered up, and obfuscated what the FBI knew about the terrorist plot and Saudi involvement before the attacks.
  7. Anthrax Terror Post 9-11-2001 — FBI Director when the post-9-11 anthrax mailings killed five and injured 14 others in the D.C. area shortly after 9-11, Mr. Mueller as FBI director was heavily involved in the investigations and accusations of two scientists who ended up innocent.  Dr. Bruce Ivins committed suicide, and Steve Hatfill won an award of $5.8 million dollars when he sued the FBI for prosecutorial misconduct.  Mr. Milkovich focuses on Ivins and does not discuss the Hatfill matter in his book.  

Mueller said he had no regrets about the anthrax investigations even though the perps were never found and two men’s lives were turned upside-down by FBI malfeasance and incompetent, abusive investigations.  Mr. Milkovich details the incompetence and abuse in the Ivins investigations and indictment.

The last two chapters of Mr. Milkovich’s book lay out the case for the danger of the expanded power and reach of the administrative and surveillance state and the effort led by Mueller and his prosecution gang to accomplish a coup d’état.

Robert Mueller’s troublesome, unethical, and corrupt FBI career prior to his appointment as the special counsel on the Trump-Russia Collusion investigation deserves a serious vetting.  I provide here two points of reference: a monograph by sitting congressman and former Texas State Court judge Louie Gohmert titled “Robert Mueller: Unmasked” and a book by Louisiana attorney and sitting Louisiana state senator John Milkovich titled Robert Mueller: Errand Boy for the New World Order.

Congressman Gohmert’s 48-page monograph is a discussion of a “long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence.  He lacks the judgment and credibility to lead the prosecution of anyone.”  Gohmert focuses on 18 examples, including: 

  • Collusion with Boston mobster Whitey Bulger in criminality and framing innocent men for murder that resulted eventually in the release of innocent parties and 100 million dollars in compensation for for DOJ Boston Office misconduct. 
  • The FBI with Mueller as director harassed and hounded Congressman Curt Weldon in revenge for criticizing FBI failures related to 9-11.
  • Dishonest prosecutions of Senator Ted Stevens.
  • Prosecutorial abuses in the anthrax murder investigations post 9-11, producing one suicide and one award of 6.8 million dollars to the other innocent target.  
  • Mueller’s unethical acceptance of the special prosecutor position when he was conflicted by his longtime personal and professional relationship with James Comey.
  • Mueller hired extremely partisan, biased, and conflicted attorneys for his special counsel team. 
  • Mueller’s investigation ignored that FISA applications evidence presented to justify warrants to surveil Trump associates were not verified and thus a fraud on the court and illegal.

Louisiana State Senator John Milkovich

Milkovich’s book, Robert Mueller: Errand Boy for the New World Order (2018), recounts Robert Mueller’s history of prosecutorial misconduct before his appointment as special counsel in the Trump matter.   

Mr. Milkovich: “Mueller has left his imprint on some of the most notorious episodes of government wrongdoing of the last thirty years.”  Mr. Milkovich is and was assiduous in his research and provides almost 400 endnotes and more than 125 items of bibliography as reference sources for his 165-page self-published book.  When I asked him about the tough calls, he pointed to the sources and compelling evidence.   

Mueller misconduct and his position in the DOJ/FBI:

  1. 9-11-2001 — FBI Director Failure of the FBI to investigate suspicious characters reported to the FBI in the fall of 2000 by Dr. David Graham, former Air Force officer and dentist friend of Mr. Milkovich, who suspected that the men were planning a terrorist attack on Barksdale Air Force Base, home for a Nuclear B52H Air Wing.  Dr. Graham reported his concerns to the local FBI office and was “stunned and outraged” in September 2001 when he saw after 9-11 that two of the men were in the group of 9-11 terrorist hijackers.  Dr. Graham protested to the FBI, was rebuffed, raised a political ruckus, threatened to write a book, and shortly thereafter was poisoned but survived with severe injuries and disability.  During his treatment at two medical facilities, FBI agents appeared and encouraged physicians to let Dr. Graham die because they said he was mentally ill and suicidal.  
  2. Boston Mob 1984 — Asst. U.S. Attorney and Acting U.S. Attorney Boston Providing cover for the Whitey Bulger Winter Hill  Boston gang that committed murders and, of course, other crimes.  The FBI framed four men, who were convicted and incarcerated for murder.  The FBI was found culpable, and more than $100 million was awarded in compensation to the injured parties.     
  3. Pan Am 103 1988–2001 — Chief of the Criminal Justice Division of the DOJ Was in charge of the investigation of the 1988 Pan Am 103 Lockerbie plane bombing killed 258 passengers and 11 on the ground.  Army major Charles McKee, who headed a Middle East hostage rescue team, was returning to the U.S. on Pan Am 103 with evidence to expose CIA-sponsored criminal activity.   After the plane was destroyed, Mr. Mueller supervised an army of FBI agents on the investigation, and finally, 12 years later, the case went to trial by a panel of Scottish judges.  Two Libyans were tried for murder; Al Amin Fhima was found not guilty, and Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was found guilty, sentenced to 20 years.  Many references by Mr. Milkovich provide a case that asserts that the FBI’s incompetent investigation failed to bring to justice Ahmed Jibril, the terrorist who arranged to plant the bomb, and others, including CIA agents, who were complicit in the bombing order to eliminate Major McKee.      
  4. BCCI 1991,92 — Chief of the FBI Criminal Justice Division Mr. Mueller was actively and energetically involved in providing cover for the criminal malfeasance and perfidy by officials of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), cover-ups for black ops, money-laundering, and financing of international criminal activities.  Mr. Mueller and the FBI interfered with the investigation by Manhattan district attorney Robert Morgenthau.   
  5. Ruby Ridge 1992 — Chief of the FBI Criminal Division The FBI tried to get Randy Weaver to be an undercover informant on separatist groups in Idaho, but he was not cooperative.  Then federal agents (Marshals and what the FBI claimed to be a hostage rescue team) surrounded his isolated cabin in the mountains, and there was a 11-day siege, punctuated by a killing of Weaver’s wife from cover while she stood on a porch holding a baby.  In addition, the son was shot in the back with a machine gun, running from the gunfire.  Mueller objected publicly to anyone who would criticize the FBI conduct.
  6. 9-11-2001 — FBI Director Mueller was named FBI director one week before 9-11-2001, and his conduct and actions related to the catastrophe are another indication of his corrupt nature.  Milkovich makes the case that not only did Mueller arrange to evacuate Saudis after 9-11, but he obstructed, covered up, and obfuscated what the FBI knew about the terrorist plot and Saudi involvement before the attacks.
  7. Anthrax Terror Post 9-11-2001 — FBI Director when the post-9-11 anthrax mailings killed five and injured 14 others in the D.C. area shortly after 9-11, Mr. Mueller as FBI director was heavily involved in the investigations and accusations of two scientists who ended up innocent.  Dr. Bruce Ivins committed suicide, and Steve Hatfill won an award of $5.8 million dollars when he sued the FBI for prosecutorial misconduct.  Mr. Milkovich focuses on Ivins and does not discuss the Hatfill matter in his book.  

Mueller said he had no regrets about the anthrax investigations even though the perps were never found and two men’s lives were turned upside-down by FBI malfeasance and incompetent, abusive investigations.  Mr. Milkovich details the incompetence and abuse in the Ivins investigations and indictment.

The last two chapters of Mr. Milkovich’s book lay out the case for the danger of the expanded power and reach of the administrative and surveillance state and the effort led by Mueller and his prosecution gang to accomplish a coup d’état.

via American Thinker

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/

MUELLER’S GOING DOWN: One of General Flynn’s New Attorneys Wrote the Book on Prosecutorial Ethics and Misconduct

Earlier this week it was widely reported that General Mike Flynn has hired well-known defense attorney Sidney Powell to represent him after abruptly firing his lawyers last week.

In a recent interview with The Epoch Times Sidney Powell blasted the appalling two-tiered judicial system in the United States today where General Michael Flynn can get set up and prosecuted by deep state operatives while Peter Strzok can leak and lie and get off scot free.

In December 2018 Powell accused the Mueller team of destroying evidence and obstructing justice in the Flynn case.

But General Flynn also hired several more attorneys besides Sidney Powell.

The team consists of new members — Jesse Binnall, Philip John Harvey & W. William Hodes, along with Sidney Powell — to represent him in his ongoing case.

These attorneys have entered notices of appearance in the EDVA case against Flynn’s former business partner where Flynn is expected to testify.

W. William Hodes is the author of “Law and Lawyering” a nationally recognized treatise on legal ethics that is updated annually. Hodes was a member of the Advisory Council to the American Bar Association’s Ethics 2000 Commission.

This should keep Robert Mueller and his far left “pitbull” Andrew Weissmann up at night.

The boomerang is coming folks.
Bill Barr and the DOJ have a lot of work to do if they want to regain the American public’s trust in the judicial system.

The post MUELLER’S GOING DOWN: One of General Flynn’s New Attorneys Wrote the Book on Prosecutorial Ethics and Misconduct appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Watch: U.S. Video Shows Iran Military Recovering Mine from Oil Tanker in Gulf of Oman

The U.S. military has released video it says shows Iran’s Revolutionary Guard taking an unexploded mine from the hull of one of two oil tankers attacked in the Gulf of Oman. Tehran hit back, accusing the U.S. of waging an “Iranophobic campaign.”

The Japanese-owned Kokuka Courageous and the Norwegian-owned Front Altair were attacked early Thursday morning. Both vessels suffered explosions, forcing crews to abandon ship and leave them adrift in waters between Gulf Arab states and Iran.

Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said the United States has assessed that Iran is responsible for the attacks and U.S. Central Command confirmed the details.

Centcom spokesman Lt. Col. Earl Brown said the U.S. Navy had responded immediately to the initial threat in the Gulf of Oman:

U.S. Naval Forces in the region received two separate distress calls at 6:12a.m. local time and a second one at 7:00 a.m. U.S. Naval Forces Central Command received the calls from the M/V Front Altair and M/V Kokuka Courageous, who were operating in international waters of the Gulf of Oman.

USS Bainbridge (DDG 96) was operating in the vicinity and provided immediate assistance to the M/V Kokuka Courageous. Twenty-one mariners from the M/V Kokuka Courageous, who abandoned ship, are currently aboard USS Bainbridge. A Navy P-8 is also providing support.

Iran has rejected the U.S. accusation against it as “baseless”. In a tweet posted early Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif accused the U.S. of “immediately” jumping to make allegations against Tehran without “a shred of factual or circumstantial evidence”.

The attack made it “abundantly clear that the #B_Team is moving to a #PlanB: Sabotage diplomacy — including by @AbeShinzo — and cover up its #EconomicTerrorism against Iran”.

Zarif regularly uses the term “B Team” to refer to U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton as well as Israel’s prime minister, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Thursday’s attack occured while Japanse Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was in Iran seeking to defuse tensions between Washington and the Islamic Republic.

Thursday’s attack resembled a similar operation in May targeting four oil tankers off the nearby Emirati port of Fujairah. U.S. officials similarly accused Iran of targeting the ships with limpet mines, which are magnetic and attach to the hulls of a ship. The mines disable, but don’t sink, a vessel.

The U.N. Security Council held closed consultations on the tanker incidents late Thursday at the request of the United States but took no action.

AFP contributed to this report

Follow Simon Kent on Twitter: or e-mail to: skent@breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com