Month: October 2019

By Wayne Allyn Root

I have at least 1000 things to write about. I could fill this column for the next 365 days. But I have to scrap them once again. President Trump screws up my plans every time.

That darn Trump economy keeps interfering with my plans. The Trump economy is so good, I have to change the topic of every column back to the booming economy.

Trump did it again. How good is Trump’s economy? Trump’s economy is so good, jobs are booming with such ferocity, the Democrat Party no longer has to depend on Ukrainian gas companies to employ all their sons.

It’s THAT good!

Or didn’t you hear that Paul Pelosi, Nancy Pelosi’s son was also on the Board of a Ukrainian gas company. And Nancy Pelosi appeared in the company’s promotional video. Funny how that works, huh? I’m betting it’s 2 for 1.

It was practically raining Democrat sons in Ukraine. Ukraine is like the “Democrat Child Employment Plan.”

It must be common knowledge for DC Dems- if your kid is a vapid party boy, drunk, coke head, prostitute addict, or a lazy do-nothing, incapable of finding an honest job, just pick up the phone and call Ukraine. They’ll always answer!

Clearly, in Ukraine, they’ll hire any American- as long as your last name is Biden, Pelosi, Clinton or Kerry.

Personally, I’m offended. I was the 2008 Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee. But no one ever offered me a Board position in Ukraine. I wonder why? What’s wrong with my resume?

Maybe it’s because I’m the founder of AARP- “Americans Against Rotten Politicians.”

Maybe it’s because I campaigned for limited government, for corrupt politicians to be indicted, for all politicians to be term limited, for more power to the American people. Could that be it?

Or maybe it’s because I’m a S.O.B. (son of a butcher). And neither my mommy nor daddy controls a $4 trillion US budget? I’m betting that’s it.

But I digress. I have to get back to the topic of the Trump economy. Trump never leaves me any choice.

The poor Democrats tried so hard to talk America into a recession. They preached doom and gloom. They reminded me of Freddie Krueger in “Nightmare on Elm Street.” They wanted us all scared, depressed, seeing visions of our own death and doom.

Oops. Another epic fail. No one listened.

Try as Democrats may, you can’t keep Trump down. Lower taxes, less regulations, and a pro-business attitude just keep beating the Democrats’ brains in.

Jobs numbers were released on Friday morning. Unemployment hit a brand new 50-year low in September. The national unemployment rate is 3.5%. Amazing.

We added 136,000 new jobs in September. Which is good, but not remarkable. You know why? Experts say we are at full employment. There is nowhere else to go. We can’t create any more jobs, because pretty much everyone who wants a job, already has one.

The jobless rate for Hispanics hit the lowest number in history- again. The jobless rate for blacks stayed at the lowest in history.

And the previous two months (July and August) saw jobs numbers revised higher. We just added an extra 45,000 jobs over the summer.

Trump has produced over 6.3 million new jobs in his first 30 months as president. At the exact same time of his presidency, Obama lost 2.5 million jobs. Add it up. Trump is almost nine million jobs better than Obama.

9 million. What a lesson for the electorate.

If you’re the son or daughter of a powerful Democrat, Ukraine has a great job for you.

But if you’re black or Hispanic, and your parents don’t control a $4 trillion budget, and you want a job in the USA, Trump is your man.

Bravo President Trump. You are the greatest non-Ukrainian jobs president ever!

Wayne Allyn Root is the host of “The Wayne Allyn Root Show” on Newsmax TV, nightly at 8 PM ET, found on DirecTV Ch #349, or Dish TV Ch #216, at https://ift.tt/2zOf79k He is also a nationally syndicated radio host of “Wayne Allyn Root: Raw & Unfiltered” found at https://ift.tt/2g4uzmV

The post WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: Trump: The Greatest Non-Ukrainian Jobs President Ever! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Friday night on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin spoke with presidential historian Paul Kengor about a grossly overlooked incident in which a prominent politician sought election help from a dangerous foreign enemy.

The U.S. politician was Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy, the foreign power was the Soviet Union, and the election was the 1984 presidential race.

According to a 1983 KGB document, which wasn’t reported until years later in 1992, a friend of Kennedy’s reached out to the Kremlin to help the Soviets deal with Ronald Reagan in exchange for assistance undermining the president in the upcoming 1984 election.

The memo lists a number of ways that Reagan’s chances for re-election might have been weakened and outlines a number of proposals such as Kennedy meeting with Soviet officials in Moscow, those officials meeting with Kennedy in the United States, and others.

Naturally, the document’s discovery was largely ignored by the American media.

“This was a major effort to get the Soviet Union to interfere in our election,” Levin said.

“Yeah, I think it’s fair to characterize it that way,” Kengor responded.

Kengor then went on to compare the Kennedy-KGB memo to the current debate over President Trump, the Ukrainian government, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter:

“Imagine if Ronald Reagan knew about this memo, Mark, right, in 1984, right? After Ted Kennedy’s shenanigans. And he knows that Kennedy is considering a challenge to Reagan in 1984. And imagine Reagan’s frustration if he would have known that no one in the media cared to even ask Kennedy about this, right? Imagine what Reagan’s frustration would be like. Imagine the temptation of Reagan to try to do what he would be able to do or his staff could do to try to expose what Kennedy did, knowing that no one in the liberal media was going to expose it or even bother to ever report on it.

“And then if Reagan would have done so, or someone in his staff would have tried to call attention to it, Reagan would have been accused by the liberal media of abusing his power, because he’d be facing a possible presidential campaign challenge by Ted Kennedy in 1984. And I think that’s what Donald Trump is facing with Joe Biden.

“Trump wants the liberal media to do its job and expose how Biden abused power, knowing that the liberal media won’t do it, so Trump knows that he has to try to expose it himself.”

Listen:

Don’t miss an episode of LevinTV. Sign up now!

Who Is The Whistle-blower?

Want to see more? Get LevinTV! https://t.co/ICZsTSuMg1 pic.twitter.com/J319W6gur3

— LevinTV (@LevinTV) September 26, 2019

The post Levin: Flashback to 1984 Ted Kennedy: ‘This was a major effort to get the Soviet Union to interfere in our election’ appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com

Wall Street, which in the past three decades has supported far more Democrats than Republicans, is drawing the line at Elizabeth Warren.

According to CNBC:

Democratic donors on Wall Street and in big business are preparing to sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle — or even back President Donald Trump — if Sen. Elizabeth Warren wins the party’s nomination.

In recent weeks, CNBC spoke to several high-dollar Democratic donors and fundraisers in the business community and found that this opinion was becoming widely shared as Warren, an outspoken critic of big banks and corporations, gains momentum against Joe Biden in the 2020 race.

“You’re in a box because you’re a Democrat and you’re thinking, ‘I want to help the party, but she’s going to hurt me, so I’m going to help President Trump,’” said a senior private equity executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity in fear of retribution by party leaders. The executive said this Wednesday, a day after Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House would begin a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump.

Which says a lot about just how left-wing-extreme Warren, the current Democratic Party frontrunner, really is.

These are people who supported candidates as far left as Obama for years. Remember all the Goldman Sachs cash that flowed into the Obama campaign coffers? 

According to Federal Election Commission figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Goldman Sachs‘ political action committee and individual contributors who listed the company as their employer donated $994,795 during 2007 and 2008 to Obama’s presidential campaign, the second-highest contribution from a company PAC and company employees.

Only the PAC and employees of the University of California, which donated more than $1.5 million, topped Goldman Sachs.

…and…

Goldman Sachs contributions to the Obama campaign were more than four times larger than the $230,095 in donations to Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign.

…and…

According to figures dating to 1990, Goldman Sachs’ PAC and employees have consistently contributed more money to Democratic rather than Republican candidates for federal office.

In the 2008 election, three out of every four dollars contributed by Goldman Sachs went to Democrats.

Now they’re saying ‘no’ to Warren? Obviously, they’ve got a sense of self-preservation, which is an outright novelty in any rich blue constituency. Silicon Valley, which also knows the score on Warren and how she’d affect their industry is not quite there, yet. This report here says that Google employees are still donating to her. This report here says the Silicon Valley solons would do anything to meet with her and she won’t give them the time of day. Let’s face it, she’s taken 70,000 selfies with members of the public, according to her campaign staff — heck, she took a selfie with me, a Trumpster, less than a week ago in San Diego, but she sure as heck won’t take one with them. What’s more, Warren is in open attack against Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, as I witnessed in San Diego. Zuck’s response? A weak sort of ‘beat me, beat me’: “Try not to antagonize her further.”

Wall Street seems to have gone well beyond the appeasement approach.

And Warren claims to be enjoying it. Here’s her tweet in response to the shadowy, behind the scenes murmurrings of the Wall Street leftists:

 

I’m fighting for an economy and a government that works for all of us, not just the wealthy and well-connected. I’m not afraid of anonymous quotes, and wealthy donors don’t get to buy this process. I won’t back down from fighting for the big, structural change we need. https://t.co/nx7GczQhHl

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 26, 2019

 

 

I’m Elizabeth Warren and I approve this message. https://t.co/2Ewkbm0ZwA

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 10, 2019

 

Apparently, she doesn’t know where all those workers she claims to champion’s 401(k)s come from.

Speaking of which, the stock market’s downturn has been blamed at least in part on Warren’s rise, which reinforces the argument above that Wall Street isn’t kenning to her. A survey of institutional investors here says they’ve got ”growing anxiety” to what she’s proposing. She apparently thinks money grows on trees — and Wall Street just harvests it.

The fatcats of the Street may be all in for avoiding Warren, who increasingly looks to be the candidate of Big Labor, but Warren says she’s got the love of the little guys, the small dollar donors, the ordinary people, the middle class, right?

That may be her plan, but if it is, she’s got a big as heck problem in that her competition, one President Trump is mopping the floor with such a strategy.

He’s outdrawing her about two-to-one with $45 million in online little-guy donations in just the third quarter alone, including 313,000 first-time donors, ever since the impeachment scam broke. By contrast, Warren’s drawn $24.6 million in the same reporting period.

Funny how the little guys are donating to the billionaire, not the union shill who claims to champion the worker but not his 401(k). Workers apparently have some concern about how their 401(k)s do based on how the stock market performs, and how Wall Street manages those assets, given who they’re donating to. Sure, in Warrenworld the worker 401(k)s could maybe be managed by some union thug instead of a Wall Street pro, but based on these figures here, the workers are pretty sure they won’t like the result. The workers, Wall Street, and the markets, are in sync here.

Which is the message sent in those little-guy donations to Trump. There must be some conversations being heard on Wall Street as word filters upward about how the mainstream feels about Warren’s plan to trash the stock market, government-ize the economy, and say she’s all doing it for the little guy to spite Wall Street and destroy its accumulated wealth. The Wall Street denizens are hearing what they’re hearing, and even with their love for blue-city Democrats, and adjusting their support accordingly. It says something that they’re murmurring to the press about it, too.

Image credit: Twitter screen shot

Wall Street, which in the past three decades has supported far more Democrats than Republicans, is drawing the line at Elizabeth Warren.

According to CNBC:

Democratic donors on Wall Street and in big business are preparing to sit out the presidential campaign fundraising cycle — or even back President Donald Trump — if Sen. Elizabeth Warren wins the party’s nomination.

In recent weeks, CNBC spoke to several high-dollar Democratic donors and fundraisers in the business community and found that this opinion was becoming widely shared as Warren, an outspoken critic of big banks and corporations, gains momentum against Joe Biden in the 2020 race.

“You’re in a box because you’re a Democrat and you’re thinking, ‘I want to help the party, but she’s going to hurt me, so I’m going to help President Trump,’” said a senior private equity executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity in fear of retribution by party leaders. The executive said this Wednesday, a day after Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House would begin a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump.

Which says a lot about just how left-wing-extreme Warren, the current Democratic Party frontrunner, really is.

These are people who supported candidates as far left as Obama for years. Remember all the Goldman Sachs cash that flowed into the Obama campaign coffers? 

According to Federal Election Commission figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, Goldman Sachs‘ political action committee and individual contributors who listed the company as their employer donated $994,795 during 2007 and 2008 to Obama’s presidential campaign, the second-highest contribution from a company PAC and company employees.

Only the PAC and employees of the University of California, which donated more than $1.5 million, topped Goldman Sachs.

…and…

Goldman Sachs contributions to the Obama campaign were more than four times larger than the $230,095 in donations to Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign.

…and…

According to figures dating to 1990, Goldman Sachs’ PAC and employees have consistently contributed more money to Democratic rather than Republican candidates for federal office.

In the 2008 election, three out of every four dollars contributed by Goldman Sachs went to Democrats.

Now they’re saying ‘no’ to Warren? Obviously, they’ve got a sense of self-preservation, which is an outright novelty in any rich blue constituency. Silicon Valley, which also knows the score on Warren and how she’d affect their industry is not quite there, yet. This report here says that Google employees are still donating to her. This report here says the Silicon Valley solons would do anything to meet with her and she won’t give them the time of day. Let’s face it, she’s taken 70,000 selfies with members of the public, according to her campaign staff — heck, she took a selfie with me, a Trumpster, less than a week ago in San Diego, but she sure as heck won’t take one with them. What’s more, Warren is in open attack against Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, as I witnessed in San Diego. Zuck’s response? A weak sort of ‘beat me, beat me’: “Try not to antagonize her further.”

Wall Street seems to have gone well beyond the appeasement approach.

And Warren claims to be enjoying it. Here’s her tweet in response to the shadowy, behind the scenes murmurrings of the Wall Street leftists:

 

I’m fighting for an economy and a government that works for all of us, not just the wealthy and well-connected. I’m not afraid of anonymous quotes, and wealthy donors don’t get to buy this process. I won’t back down from fighting for the big, structural change we need. https://t.co/nx7GczQhHl

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 26, 2019

 

 

I’m Elizabeth Warren and I approve this message. https://t.co/2Ewkbm0ZwA

— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 10, 2019

 

Apparently, she doesn’t know where all those workers she claims to champion’s 401(k)s come from.

Speaking of which, the stock market’s downturn has been blamed at least in part on Warren’s rise, which reinforces the argument above that Wall Street isn’t kenning to her. A survey of institutional investors here says they’ve got ”growing anxiety” to what she’s proposing. She apparently thinks money grows on trees — and Wall Street just harvests it.

The fatcats of the Street may be all in for avoiding Warren, who increasingly looks to be the candidate of Big Labor, but Warren says she’s got the love of the little guys, the small dollar donors, the ordinary people, the middle class, right?

That may be her plan, but if it is, she’s got a big as heck problem in that her competition, one President Trump is mopping the floor with such a strategy.

He’s outdrawing her about two-to-one with $45 million in online little-guy donations in just the third quarter alone, including 313,000 first-time donors, ever since the impeachment scam broke. By contrast, Warren’s drawn $24.6 million in the same reporting period.

Funny how the little guys are donating to the billionaire, not the union shill who claims to champion the worker but not his 401(k). Workers apparently have some concern about how their 401(k)s do based on how the stock market performs, and how Wall Street manages those assets, given who they’re donating to. Sure, in Warrenworld the worker 401(k)s could maybe be managed by some union thug instead of a Wall Street pro, but based on these figures here, the workers are pretty sure they won’t like the result. The workers, Wall Street, and the markets, are in sync here.

Which is the message sent in those little-guy donations to Trump. There must be some conversations being heard on Wall Street as word filters upward about how the mainstream feels about Warren’s plan to trash the stock market, government-ize the economy, and say she’s all doing it for the little guy to spite Wall Street and destroy its accumulated wealth. The Wall Street denizens are hearing what they’re hearing, and even with their love for blue-city Democrats, and adjusting their support accordingly. It says something that they’re murmurring to the press about it, too.

Image credit: Twitter screen shot

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Women who have survived China’s concentration camps for Muslim ethnic minorities reported widespread rape, forced abortions, forced sterilization, and other extreme sexual human rights atrocities in accounts published this weekend.

Speaking to the Washington Post, the women echo the experiences of others who have escaped the estimated thousands of concentration camps built in Xinjiang, China’s largest and westernmost province, to house Uighur, Kazakh, and Kyrgyz ethnic people. While survivors tend to be Kazakh – they can use their dual citizenship to escape to neighboring Kazakhstan – the majority of the 1 to 3 million people trapped in the camps are believed to be Uighurs. Others who have survived have been able to use their marital status to citizens of Pakistan or other neighboring countries to place pressure on Beijing to release them.

The nations themselves have not made any official statements condemning the Communist Party’s attempt to eradicate ethnic minorities in Xinjiang – sometimes actively praising it – but have quietly helped individuals with the influence to get their attention.

Camp survivors have previously testified to extreme torture, killings, live organ harvesting, infanticide, and slavery in the camps. An Associated Press (AP) report published last year revealed that some clothes made in slave facilities in the concentration camps made its way to America.

“Any woman or man under age 35 was raped and sexually abused,” Ruqiye Perhat, a student arrested in Xinjiang in 2009 for four years, told the Post. More recent survivors say that the camps had made rape more systematic than in regular prisons; guards would “put bags on the heads of the ones they wanted” and take the women out of their cells to be raped all night, returned for their fellow prisoners to see in the morning. One human rights activist told the Post they had documented at least seven cases of women being forced against their will to receive intrauterine devices as part of their entering the concentration camp, presumably to keep them from getting pregnant through rape.

Those who were arrested while pregnant – often for “crimes” like downloading the messaging application WhatsApp – were forced into harrowing abortions.

Gulzira Mogdyn told the Post that Chinese regime officials slashed her open without anesthesia and “cut my fetus out.”

The Washington Post testimonies echo those of other survivors who have endured sexual human rights violations and the killing of their unborn children. Many have also stated that the Chinese officials violated their bodily integrity in other ways, such as conducting medical examinations to prepare them for organ harvesting.

Mihrigul Tursun, a camp survivor, testified last year that Chinese authorities killed one of her infant triplets upon imprisoning her. The death occurred while the children were with Chinese authorities, forcibly taken for her. She told reporters she believes the child died of force-feeding.

An unnamed Kazakh concentration camp survivor testified to forced birth control accompanying the systematic use of rape to torture women at the camps.

“Young girls are taken out and raped all night long. If you keep resisting, they will inject you with something and kill you,” the woman told the Epoch Times. “There are usually 40 to 50 people in one small room, but five to 10 are regularly taken out and they just disappear—they never come back. People are being killed in tens all the time.”

Speaking to Radio Free Asia (RFA) last month, Zumuret Dawut described her forced sterilization in a concentration camp. Dawut escaped because her husband, a Pakistani national, petitioned his government to intervene.

“The family planning office gave me a letter and said: ‘Come back on the date stated in the letter and we will offer you a free operation to stop you from becoming pregnant,’” she told the outlet. “On hearing this my husband pleaded, ‘Does she have to undergo this procedure?’ … They said, ‘If you don’t comply it will effect your entry back into the country in the future, also your children’s schooling.’”

“On the day of my operation, I was taken inside the operating room, all I remember was that I was given an infusion. When I opened my eyes … There was no medical staff, doctors or nurses It was a very cold day, and I was covered with only a thin bed sheet,” she noted. “No one was allowed to visit from outside. When I looked around I heard other women moaning from pain. Once the effect of the anaesthetic wore off, I felt a sharp pain in my lower abdominal.”

Dawut added that, in the camp, she was forced to strip naked in front of multiple male officers and forced to take drugs that made her “[become] numb emotionally” and prevented her menstrual cycle from naturally taking place.

She also underwent organ testing to see if doctors could harvest them for profit, she said.

Human rights activists, journalists, and whistleblowers have testified for years to China’s policy of cutting open political prisoners to extract their organs while alive, without anesthesia, and sell them to willing buyers. Speculation first arose when observers noted that the number of organ transplants conducted in China was far greater than the official existing list of organ donors, leaving unclear how the remaining transplants were conducted without organs.

In 2014, Enver Tothi testified to cutting organs out of a live political prisoner in Urumqi, the Xinjiang capital. Tohti told the China Tribunal – a coalition of international legal experts investigating the Xinjiang camps – that he believed China was preparing to conduct these operations on Uighurs and others imprisoned in Xinjiang.

China has traditionally reserved the torturous operation for use on practitioners of Falun Gong, a spiritual movement that it considers a dangerous anti-communist cult.

Jewher Ilham, daughter of imprisoned Uighur scholar Ilham Tohti, similarly accused China of live organ harvesting against her people in July.

“They harvest prisoners’ organs for sale. At the airport, there is now a fast track security lane for organs to pass,” she said.

The Washington Post noted that activists have called these practices “genocide.” The official international legal definition of genocide lists “imposing measures intended to prevent births” on a “national, ethnic, racial, or religious group … to bring about its physical destruction.”

The issue of genocide in China came to the forefront of the sports world on Sunday evening when the NBA forced Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey to effusively apologize to the communist regime for posting a mild statement of support for anti-communist protests in Hong Kong on social media. The NBA itself also apologized to China, triggering a stern response from the World Uyghur Congress, an international organization fighting for human rights in Xinjiang and elsewhere.

“The NBA has a dismal record of silence & self-censorship on Human Rights in China,” the World Uyghur Congress said in a statement on Twitter, noting that the NBA established a training camp in Xinjiang that profits the communist regime without challenging the existence of concentration camps there. “The NBA’s willingness to appease China & overlook its abhorrent behaviour contradicts the core values & business standards it claims to espouse,” the organization observed.

Follow Frances Martel on Facebook and Twitter.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

A female who transitioned to male as a teenager is speaking out about transgender regret. 

Twenty-eight-year-old Charlie Evans told Sky News in a recent interview that she’s spoken to “hundreds” of young people, mostly same-sex attracted women, who regret their gender transition. She also encountered an “online community of 5,000 in a similar position,” according to the network (video report below).  

Evans transitioned and viewed herself as male for almost ten years, before deciding to detransition. 

“I’m in communication with 19 and 20-year-olds who have had full gender reassignment surgery who wish they hadn’t, and their dysphoria hasn’t been relieved, they don’t feel better for it,” she told Sky News, adding, ”I think some of the common characteristics are that they tend to be around their mid-20s, they’re mostly female and mostly same-sex attracted, and often autistic as well.”

“They don’t know what their options are now,” Evans explained.

After dealing with her own experiences and connecting with hundreds of others, Evans  has started a charity called “The Detransition Advocacy Network.” 

“The Detransition Advocacy Network was established to support people who have stopped or reversed gender reassignment,” an ad on Eventbrite for an event for the charity explains. 

To celebrate the launch of The Detransition Advocacy Network on November 30, a group called “Make More Noise” will host an event “discussing the ethics of the social and medical transition of gender non-conforming women and girls” and will feature “talks from professionals working in the field followed by a panel discussion of detransitioned women talking about their experiences.”

After speaking publicly about her transition, Evans recalled being confronted by a young woman “with a beard” who also regretted her transition. “She said she felt shunned by the LGBT community for being a traitor. So I felt I had to do something,” Evans said. 

Another woman who reached out to Evans said she began her transition at the tender age of 13. “After taking testosterone her voice got a lot deeper, she grew facial hair and her body changed. She had been planning to have surgery to remove her breasts this summer,” Sky News reported. 

Now, at 21, the young woman, who only wished to be identified as “Ruby,” wishes to try to undo the damage done to her body and live as a female. 

“I didn’t think any change was going to be enough in the end and I thought it was better to work on changing how I felt about myself, than changing my body,” Ruby said. 

Ruby compared gender dysphoria to an eating disorder; she’s personally suffered with both.

“I’ve seen similarities in the way I experience gender dysphoria, in the way I experience other body image issues,” she said. 

“When I was at my gender clinic to get referred for hormones, we had a session where I went over my mental health issues and I told them about my eating disorder and they didn’t suggest that that could maybe connected with my gender dysphoria,” Ruby explained. “For everyone who has gender dysphoria, whether they are trans or not, I want there to be more options for us because I think there is a system of saying, ‘okay here’s your hormones, here’s your surgery, off you go.’ I don’t think that’s helpful for anyone.”

A spokesperson for the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, which takes on gender-confused “transgender” patients as young as three years old, pushed back on the women’s lived experiences. 

“Decisions about physical interventions made in our care are arrived at after a thorough exploration process. While some of our patients may decide not to pursue physical treatment or drop out of treatment, the experience of regret described here is rarely seen,” the spokesperson said. 

As highlighted by Sky News, questioning gender transition, even within young people, has been largely castigated as “transphobic” rhetoric. Still, folks like Evans and Ruby who regret their transition are resisting pressures to keep quiet. 

And there are more. In 2016, PJ Media ran a piece on two young people, both female, speaking out against transitions of children and young people. One of the women detailed  irrevocable physical harm she had undergone in the process of her own now-regrettable gender transitions.

“I am a real, live 22-year-old woman, with a scarred chest and a broken voice, and five o’clock shadow because I couldn’t face the idea of growing up to be a woman, that’s my reality,” Cari Stella revealed in a YouTube video. As noted by PJ Media, Stella “objected to transgender journalist Julia Serano’s insistence on calling her ‘transgender.’”

“Gender was done to me,” Stella continued, “gender was traumatizing to me, I don’t want anything to do with it anymore.”

“When I was transitioning, I felt a strong desire — what I would have called a ‘need’ at the time — to transition,” she explained, though the transition would eventually have what she underscored were harmful effects. “It can be damn hard to figure out that the treatment you’re being told is to help you is actually making your mental health worse. Testosterone made me even more dissociated than I already was.” 

Another young woman who has decided to detransition after identifying as male, Carey Callahan, voiced frustration with the transgender journalist for “erasing” her lived experience. 

“If self-definition is a human right, I don’t know how much louder we can shout to the world we’re not trans,” she said. “And for me, if you say that I’m on the transgender spectrum, what you’re doing is you’re erasing everything I’m telling you about my life and my story.”

“I had trauma that led to me disassociating from my female body, and … the longer I chased that disassociation — the more I asked people to call me special pronouns, the more I tried to change my body, the more I ensconced myself in a community that would affirm a trans identity, the worse I felt,” Callahan explained. 

“It’s a central story in my life, and you’re erasing it to make me fit into your ideology,” she added. “Your set of ideas of how the world works is not worth acting like I don’t exist, or acting like you get to define my gender for me. No, that’s not how that works. I’m a real person, and you have to deal with my existence.”

Sky News’ report below:

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

(UPI) — Archaeologists uncovered a 5,000-year-old city and a 7,000-year-old religious temple in northern Israel, officials announced Sunday.

Directors for the Israel Antiquities Authority described the city as “the Early Bronze Age New York” of the region spanning more than 160 acres and accommodating about 6,000 inhabitants.

“There is no doubt that this site dramatically changes what we know about the character of the period and the beginning of urbanization of Israel,” Israel Antiquities Authority directors Dr. Ytzhak Paz and Dr. Dina Shalem said in a statement.

During excavations under the city’s houses, archaeologists found a religious temple that was 2,000 years older.

The temple was filled with evidence from various religious rituals including a large stone basin used to hold liquids, burnt animal bones suggesting sacrificial offerings and rare figures.

“These surprising findings allow us, for the first time, to define the cultural characteristics of the inhabitants of this area in ancient times,” the Israel Antiquities Authority said.

Millions of pottery fragments, flint tools and basalt stone vessels were also uncovered at the site.

The discoveries indicated that two springs originating in the area attracted people to the city where researchers believe people made their living from agriculture and traded with different regions.

About 5,000 teenagers and volunteers also participated in the excavations as part of the Israel Antiquities Authority’s Sharing Heritage project for 2 1/2 years in the En Eusr archaeological site near Wadi Ara in the Haifa District.

The site was discovered before the construction of a highway interchange.

“The challenges the archaeological excavation presented the students and the uncovering of its findings, contributed both to their personal development and enriched their acquaintance with the country’s landscape, its sites and history,” guide Noah Shaul said.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

In 2014 a phone call was hacked and released between Victoria Nuland, Asst. Sec. of State for Europe, and US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt. The call was leaked to the news media on February 4, 2014.

From the video—
What’s really important here is the level of planning for the coup that overthrew the elected President Viktor Yanukovych, which brought to power (as heard on the recording) a group of select individuals described as “moderate democrats.”

Nuland and Ambassador Pyatt agreed to who they would allow into the incoming regime.

For some reason this was OK to the US media.

And Joe Biden

Today the Democrats and fake news want President Trump impeached for discussing Joe Biden’s multi-million dollar pay-for-play scheme. The media says this is interference.

The post LEAKED: Obama Officials Including Ambassador Discuss Toppling Ukrainian Government and Replacing Officials, With Biden’s Approval — But This Was OK According to Media? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Americans are beyond angry with the actions the Democrats, elites, the Deep State and their media.

President Donald Trump is a great man and the greatest President of this generation.

His list of accomplishments is unending and proves his devotion to the country.

*The highest stock markets ever – up nearly 50% since his election win
*The most stock market all time daily highs in a year (71)
*The most stock market all time daily highs in a row (12) – tying Reagan
*The largest stock market rally in a day – over 1,000 points
*The lowest overall unemployment in 50 years currently at 3.5%
*The lowest unemployment ever for women, Hispanics and blacks
*The most Americans working in history
*More job openings that employees
*Massive wage increases, especially in the lowest income workers
*Medium level income at highest levels ever recorded
*Over 6 million new jobs since 2017 (good paying jobs too)
*American energy independence for first time in decades
*American energy exporter first time in decades
*Out of Obamacare mandate which forced Americans to pay tax penalty for not affording insurance
*Millions of Americans off of food stamps
*Strongest military ever
*Started Space Force – preparing America for space age defense
*Destroyed evil ISIS in Syria/Iraq after Obama said they would be there for a generation
*Got US out of horrible Obama trade deal with China and Asian countries giving away US jobs
*Drafted new trade deal with Canada and Mexico (USMCA) which will save US jobs
*Drafted new trade deal with Japan
*Drafted new trade deal with Korea
*Standing up to China in trade and intellectual property theft
*Signed lowest corporate tax rates in decades helping US companies and workers
*First President to step inside North Korea
*First President to meet with North Korea leader in effort to achieve peace
*Standing up for America in NATO requesting EU countries to pay fair share
*Record number of regulations eliminated
*Two new Supreme Court judges
*More than 100 new District judges
*Withdrew from horrible Paris accords
*Withdrew from horrible Iran deal

The WhiteHouse.gov lists many,many more.

In addition to all of this, the President was forced to follow the most corrupt administration in US history. 

As a result of the Obama Administration:

*The FBI is no longer trusted let alone respected due to its leaders actions related to Comey, Strzok, Page, McCabe, and others in passing on Hillary crimes while attacking candidate and President Trump
*Corrupt Obama judges like Amy Berman Jackson who put 70 year old Paul Manafort in solitary are still in place
*The DOJ is full of corrupt lawyers who were involved in Obama Administration coverups and illegal and sinister Deep State actions to spy on candidate and President Trump in efforts to prevent him from winning the election and then attempting to remove him from his Presidency
*The media is corrupt. Mainstream outlets like the New York Times, WaPo, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc, etc… are all in the tank with Obama Democrats. They praised him like a god during his realm and now follow his lead in slandering President Trump and ignoring his many accomplishments
*NeverTrumpers and other elites on the right side of the isle (e.g. Mitt Romney, etc..) have shown their real colors and lack of integrity due to their hate for President Trump. They would have preferred Hillary.
*Numerous acts of bribery and extortion were present in Obama’s world and this bled down to into the government as a whole. It appeared that all of DC was corrupt.

Ultimately, President Trump’s greatest accomplishment is that he beat Corrupt Hillary in the 2016 election.  He arguably is the only one who could have beaten her.  The Clinton’s had a machine and no one dared stand up to her but candidate Trump.  Trump pointed out her many corrupt acts and won the greatest election of our lifetime.

The corrupt actors from the DNC, Deep State and media are not happy with President Trump.  They have done all they can to remove him.  Candidate Trump overcame their illegal acts during the election and then the corrupt Mueller investigation, where the President was investigated for no crime for more than three years when you include time before the election.

The Mueller investigation was not an investigation but an obstruction trap.  They did everything they could to get the President to do something they could claim was obstruction but he did not fold.  They brought his son in for hours of testimony, his daughter and her husband, they set up his son in Trump Tower, they invaded his personal attorney’s office, storage locker and home.  They stole documents from his transition team.  They set up and arrested his NSA General Mike Flynn who still is involved in the courts today.  Everyone he knew or touched was investigated, against the law using the Special Counsel Act, but President Trump stood firm.

The President was berated by the far left media every day.  They called him a traitor and fraudulent President.  They claimed he worked with Russians to win the election which never made sense because he was later attacked with dirt supposedly coming from Russia.

President Trump thrived in all of this like no US President since Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War.  Lincoln survived the war started by Democrats who wanted to keep their slaves only to be assassinated a couple weeks after the Civil War’s end.  The Democrats still want Americans to be their slaves!  They seek ultimate power.  This is why America voted for Trump!

Now the Deep State wants to remove President Trump from office in another bogus attempt to manipulate the law to their liking.  This is not how the law is supposed to be used in this country.  Obama destroyed the proper use of the law.

Democrats, their media and their Deep State want to rake the President through more shame and lies and then impeach him based on lies and no crimes.  They do this to prevent their crimes during the Obama years from being outed and them held accountable.  They have to make something up to take down Trump.  Their lies rank them with former totalitarian regimes and banana republics. 

Impeachments are to be only used in rare circumstances.  Again, there is no crime.  The Democrats won’t vote on an impeachment exercise so the President can fight back against them in the courts.  They don’t want Americans to see that this is a one-sided exercise.  A vote would show this.  They want to act quickly and vote on impeachment so they can use this against President Trump and punish him and those who voted for him!

WE WON’T LET THEM!

The post Warning to Deep State Dems and Coastal Elites: Good Americans Will Not Allow Their Innocent President to Be Impeached by Corrupt Politicians over Nothing! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

New York City’s latest effort not to have to go to court over one of its gun laws failed at the Supreme Court on Monday. Justices told the city’s lawyers to wait until December to try again.

The case in question is  New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. [NYSRPA] v. City of New York, New York, which asks whether New York City’s laws about transporting a licensed, unloaded, and locked firearm to a residence or shooting range outside the five boroughs is consistent with the Second Amendment.

The city has tried to make the case that, because it eased its transport restrictions, that the case is now moot. The Supreme Court, however, didn’t see it that way Monday when it issued an order denying New York’s “suggestion of mootness” and adding, “The
question of mootness will be subject to further consideration at oral argument, and the parties should be prepared to discuss it.” Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for early December.

Back in July, the city filed a document making the case for mootness after it put out a new set of regulations that it said “give petitioners everything they have sought in this lawsuit.”

Lawyers for the petitioners in the case — the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association — responded to that by saying the case should nonetheless go before the court.

New York state law requires licenses for handgun ownership that are issued by local authorities; these are either a “possess on premises” or concealed carry permit. The case began over six years ago in March 2013 and deals with the former. Under New York City’s previous set of regulations, a Federalist Society blog post explains, “a New Yorker whom the City itself has licensed to possess a handgun cannot transport her handgun to a weekend second home (even to exercise the core constitutional purpose of self-defense), to an upstate county to participate in a shooting competition, or even across the bridge to a neighboring city for target practice.”

The post Supreme Court rejects NYC’s attempt to get Second Amendment case thrown out appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com

Jill Wine-Banks is a MSNBC contributor and former Watergate prosecutor.

Saturday on AM Joy with homophobic, racist Joy Reid, Jill Wine-Banks drew out the Democrat plan to impeach President Trump and Vice President Pence and replace them with Speaker Nancy Pelosi as president.

This is today’s Democrat Party – power-lusting criminals and tyrants.

Via The Washington Examiner.

Joining the network’s AM Joy on Saturday, Wine-Banks was asked if Congress should look to impeach Trump first or turn their eyes to Pence instead. In response, she suggested going after Pence first and giving Trump the option to either replace him before being impeached himself — so that a Republican can remain in the White House — or decline and let Pelosi take over.

“You could impeach Pence first,” Wine-Banks stated. “The problem is that Donald Trump then has to name his replacement. But I think that maybe a deal could be struck where he was told, ‘If you don’t make a replacement, then Nancy Pelosi does become president. And so, you are going to be impeached and convicted. You need to make this replacement so that the proper party remains in power.’“

These deranged leftists are open about their plans for America.
Complete tyranny and lawlessness.

The post MSNBC Hack Reveals Democrat Party Plans to Impeach Trump and Make Way for President Nancy Pelosi (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com