Levin slams ‘feckless’ Senate Republicans for trying to keep the identity of the ‘so-called whistleblower’ secret

Thursday night on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin criticized a handful of Senate Republicans for saying that they don’t want the American people to know the identity of the federal employee behind the whistleblower complaint.

Levin pointed to reports that Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., said that the federal employee’s identity shouldn’t be disclosed. “We protect whistleblowers. We protect witnesses in our committee,” Burr told reporters on Thursday. Other Senate Republicans such as Mitt Romney, Utah, have made similar statements about shielding the employee’s identity from the public.

“This is not only embarrassing to these senators,” Levin said, “it is a grave disservice to the American people.”

Levin rebutted the idea that the employee’s identity is shielded from becoming public information, pointing out the limits of the relevant whistleblower statute, noting that the law does not guarantee plenary anonymity to any whistleblower. “There is absolutely no legal reason — none — for the so-called whistleblower’s identity to be kept secret,” he concluded.

“It is wholly relevant for the American people, the committee, the full Congress, and the president to know about this individual’s conduct, contacts, partisanship, etc. — absolutely relevant,” Levin concluded. “And that’s why the Democrats, the media, and some feckless Republicans would apparently have the nation go through an impeachment process and a trial, if they have their way, without ever knowing who started it. Now that would be unconscionable, and yet that’s what they insist on.”

Listen:


Don’t miss an episode of LevinTV. Sign up now!

The post Levin slams ‘feckless’ Senate Republicans for trying to keep the identity of the ‘so-called whistleblower’ secret appeared first on Conservative Review.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com

Report: Student Refuses To Wear LGBT ‘Rainbow Poppy’, Distributes Poster With Her Reasons. Then She’s Suspended.

According to a former Conservative Party candidate from northern Manitoba in Canada, her 17-year-old cousin was suspended from school when she refused to wear a Remembrance Day poppy containing a rainbow in support of LGBT+ causes.

A report from The Post Millennial indicated the teenager was suspended for distributing a poster outlining her reasons for refusing to wear the rainbow poppy.

Cyara Bird of the Little Black River First Nation, whose grandfather was reportedly a World War II veteran, wrote on Twitter that her 17-year-old cousin Natalie and another student said they would not wear the rainbow poppy at Stonewall Collegiate as they preferred to wear the traditional red-and-black poppy, with Natalie reportedly saying the rainbow poppy was “disrespectful” to the World War II veterans in her family.

Bird wrote:

My 17-year-old cousin was suspended today… want to know why? Her choir teacher was demanding that the choir wear rainbow poppies during their performance in the Remembrance Day ceremony. She and another student rejected that idea, and both were suspended for “hate speech.”

The poster allegedly distributed by Natalie read:

Never seen something so disrespectful in all my days. What does LGBTQ have to do with the war? Red represents Blood, Black represents widows and loved ones, green represents land the blood was spilled on. NEVER change the poppy. Way to un-do centuries of blood sweat and tears all because you needed to do the dishes. Keep it in your pants nobody wants or needs to see it.

You’ve got a whole month dedicated to the LGBTQ community, but the people who legitimately made a difference and died so that we could live decent lives get one day. You don’t need a poppy, you just clearly want attention. One day to celebrate the real hero’s how about we don’t make it about your sexuality for once?

If you didn’t make such a big deal about it and force people to make it a part of their lives it would be no problem.

Natalie told The Post Millenial, “It all started when teachers, counselors, and some students said we should wear the rainbow poppy … I typed up papers on a computer, printed them off, and taped them up in the halls. As I was putting them up, teachers were taking them down. I watched as they took them to the office and gave them to the secretary.”

Natalie said she was taken to the principal’s office; she continued, “They accused me of hate speech and endangering the physical safety of the group of individuals (LGBT students). They asked me what I was thinking, and I told them everything … I said I was just voicing my beliefs and morals. I got to the point of almost crying, but I didn’t. I had to be the voice for all those families who were greatly disrespected and offended … So I asked why? Why am I being suspended and punished for expressing my feelings? And they said everybody is entitled to their own beliefs, opinions, and way of life. So I asked, why am I not?”

Remembrance Day is observed in the countries and states of the British Commonwealth to honor the members of their armed forces who have died in the line of duty since the end of the First World War.

Traditionally, the day was observed in Canada by people wearing a poppy made of paper or fabric red material and a black center, as The Post Millenial observed. Funds collected from the sale of the poppies have gone to the Legion Poppy Fund for financial assistance to veterans.

Bird added on Twitter, “I should add that the school screamed at her to stay quiet about it.” She posted a message from Natalie’s father reading, “Good the school was trying to hush her about it they literally both screamed at her she tried to voice record them on her phone and they tried to take it away from her.”

Cyara Bird told the Post Millennial, “At 17, you are growing into yourself, you are learning to speak out against things you think are wrong. What kind of message does this send to a young woman? That they are not supposed to speak out against something they disagree with.” She added, “The pride we have because of our grandfather fighting in World War II is strong. We all wear poppies. [Natalie] was not opposing wearing one—she just did not want to wear one she felt was disrespectful to the veterans.”

Board chair Alan Campbell of The Interlake School Division told LifeSite News, “In the interests of maintaining confidentiality, we would not publicly comment on any student matter whatsoever.” He added, “But what I can tell you is that at no point did a staff member of Stonewall Collegiate or Interlake School Division direct, mandate or suggest that any student should have to wear a rainbow poppy.”

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Teacher Gives Homework Where Students Pack Their Bags As Trump ‘Is Trying To Take Control Of The United States!’

On Wednesday, a teacher at a Pennsylvania middle school issued a homework assignment in which students were instructed to photograph themselves packing a bag to pretend they were refugees forced to leave their homes as “President Trump is trying to take control of the United States! There are fights in the streets!” according to WPXI.

The homework assignment at the middle school in the Penn Cambria School District in Gallitzin, PA, reportedlyupset parents. Penn Live reported, “District Superintendent William Marshall says the teacher realized the ‘huge error’ and has called each parent individually to apologize.”

The assignment stated:

President Trump is trying to take control of the United States! There are fights in the streets! You have to pretend that you are a refugee being forced to leave your home, never to return. Please have a parent to time them for ten minutes while they packed a bag. When the time was up they were to take a picture of the contents of their backpack and then email it to me. If no picture, then draw it. You will have to present to us why you chose those items. This is due on Thursday. Worth 10 points.

The teacher’s actions would seem to be out of place at the school; the middle school itself adheres to conservative principles. Its dress code reads:

Shirts must cover the midriff at all times. Shirts must reach the waistband of pants whether sitting or standing. Halter, tube tops, spaghetti strap shirts are NOT permitted. Tops must be wide enough to cover bra straps. Pants for boys and girls must fit at the waist so that your underwear does not show when you are sitting or standing. Logos on the back of pants or shorts are not permitted. Shorts and skirts must be at least the length of student’s fingertips when hands are dropped to the side.

The middle school website also notes, “We had the privilege of having the U.S. Honor Flag Network visit the Middle School on Wednesday, October 2nd.  They held a presentation that focused on America’s Heroes, Integrity, Patriotism, and sharing the U.S. Honor Flag.”

On September 24, a Computer Applications teacher at Watson B. Duncan Middle School in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida gave students a quiz with a question in which students were asked which president, Donald Trump, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, or Jimmy Carter, was the “45th Pres; 2017; Republican; Real Estate businessman; Idiot.”

The teacher claimed she downloaded the quiz from Quizlet, and had not reviewed the question before making it part of the quiz, as WPTV reported.

As ABC Action News reported, the school’s principal sent a letter to parents that read:

Hello Duncan Middle School Parents, this is Principal Philip D’Amico. A question on a quiz given by your child’s Computer Applications teacher yesterday was brought to my attention this morning. The question was inappropriate and demonstrated an unacceptable lack of good judgment on the part of the teacher. An investigation is now underway, and the teacher has been reassigned during this process. Because this is an open inquiry, I am not at liberty to share any additional details with you at this point. I apologize for this incident, and for the offensive verbiage used in the question. Thank you for your patience, and your continued support of Watson B. Duncan Middle School.

The school district released this statement to to WPTV: “Despite the fact that the teacher didn’t write, or intentionally select the question, the District views this error as a display of unprofessional behavior. The School District of Palm Beach County holds our educators to the highest standards. The teacher has been disciplined.”

 

 

 

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Dennis Prager Asks Is Trump a Fascist? Bill Maher Says He ‘Wants to Be’

The panel discussion on Friday’s edition of Real Time focused on the impeachment inquiry; with a specific emphasis on the events leading up to it.The segment featured a lot of loaded language to describe President Trump and his actions; with former Time editor Richard Stengel describing the President’s phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart as an “extortion” and host Bill Maher claiming that Trump “wants to be” a fascist.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Decoding Trump Derangement Syndrome

The monsoons in Mumbai are particularly punishing especially when you are the sole occupant of  open-air rickshaw, engulfed in traffic beyond your range of vision. After several minutes the static traffic began to move, the collective noise of automobile engines was about to drown every sounds in the vicinity.

Suddenly a shrill wail penetrated through, the sort of cry that would cause the most heartless of individuals to shudder. Quite soon, it was discovered that a puppy had surreptitiously crept under a taxi cab to avoid the heavy rains. Everybody stepped out of their cars fearing the worst. Then the taxi driver emerged with the puppy in his arms, fortunately, it was only a minor limb injury.

For devout Hindus, the dog is sacred, the cab driver pledged to nurse the puppy to recovery and even adopt it.  People around tried to console the man who was clearly distraught by the accident. Then a young man in his early twenties rushed through the crowd, pushed his way all through to confront the driver.

He began by calling the driver a monster and went on to accuse him of not caring for lives, other than his. for. The taxi driver pleaded forgiveness with her asserting that it was an honest mistake. But he didn’t stop, he accused him of trying ‘murder’ a helpless animal. His voice turned louder as the accusations continued. The taxi driver stood there helplessly.

The young man by then tried to grab the taxi driver by his collar when he was restrained by the crowd, then cursed the driver wishing him a very painful death for ‘harm’ caused.  He then vowed to have the taxi driver ‘punished’. The police arrived and order was restrained.

                                                          ***

Several weeks later, on a Friday night, I was at a crowded restaurant with friends discussing politics. As always the discussion devolved into an argument but before we could even think of contemplate raising out decibels, a familiar voice drew everybody’s attention. The voice drowned every sound in the noisy restaurant.

Lo and behold it was the same young man, the animal rights activist. This time the dispute was about the meal served. When the server asked him to calm down so they could resolve the matter amicably, he accused him of being ‘inconsiderate’. Soon the manager arrived at the scene only to be viciously berated by the youth.

In minutes an elderly woman hurried toward the scene. She tried to pacify the unruly young man but to no avail. When she tried to convince the young man that the food served what she had ordered, before she stepped out for a phone call, his rage reached its peak.

“You never support me, always siding with the other. Enjoy your meal.” bellowed the youth as darted out of the restaurant.

The elderly woman said she was his mother profusely apologized to all, said that her son had a ‘temper problem’ but ‘a kind soul’, paid the bill and left.

                                                          ***

It struck me how my perception of the youth with a ‘temper problem’ changed. When he viciously attacked the cab driver over the injured animal, I viewed him from the prism of an individual who had deep compassion for animals. An individual who couldn’t restrain himself because she saw an innocent puppy in pain. I thought his reaction was extreme but on some level that it was from a good place. But the same behavior replicated at the restaurant showed that the outburst had very little to do with the injured puppy and all to do with him. It just that when he had found cause to hide behind and give him a license to behave badly

It struck me that this is no different from the ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’. We have seen Trump supporters sporting MAGA hats regularly incur the wrath of haters, Trump family members have been verbally attacked in airplanes and spat at in restaurants, Trump cabinet members being driven out of restaurants, the list of abominable behavior is endless.

Social media often plays a vital role in unmasking pretenders. In the absence of a pre-approved script and a visible audience, the visceral hate oozes out like septic puss. We have seen many people of ‘eminence’ scoff, scorn and even turn viciously abusive Trump and his supporters. They have called Donald Trump a traitor, a criminal, a Russian puppet and a con man. They have used expletives and vulgarities. Some have called for a coup, have called Trump’s youngest child to be attacked. They even wish for an assassination. They want to blacklist all Trump supporters rendering them jobless.

Like parasites who attach themselves to any host to serve their purpose. These deranged individuals have attached themselves to the host called  ‘The Resistance’. The purpose is to earn their vile behavior a backbone of morality. When people call them out they say ‘we are angry because Trump is in office’. They claim to be ‘custodians of empathy’ whose heart goes out for all the downtrodden that they claim are being hurt by Trump.

Beyond the glaring limelight, they have been known to leave viciously abusive voice messages for their daughter, threaten their assistant, and even physically attack people around them. The #MeToo movement has exposed many of them as sexual predators, destroying lives and careers and preying mercilessly on the innocent. Equally to blame are those who turned a blind eye toward the predators because they profited from them. So much for their morality and compassion.

Ironically Trump has implemented policies that they claim to stand for, such as criminal justice reform and pulling out of unnecessary wars. His strong economy means that everybody including people from minority groups, who they claim to stand for, are earning more and leading better lives.

The term ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ was coined to explain this irrational and inconsolable rage against Trump. But dig deeper and you find that much like the livid man at the restaurant, these are hateful individuals, and have serious anger management issues and personal problems. It’s just that Trump is the latest whom the can vent out on with impunity.

If this were just a few loons, the behavior could be ignored. But at the bottom of this, all is a blatant attempt delegitimize a democratically elected president without any evidence of wrongdoing. A lot of other unstable individuals out there feel empowered to conduct themselves in the most despicable manner because the eminent and prominent are doing it. An example is the shooting of Republican members of Congress by an individual at a softball practice back in 2017. It just takes one individual to opt for an extreme move.

Since the media is largely anti-Trump, the perpetrators know they will get a pass. In fact, CNN did a very favorable interview of an individual who tried to attack Trump at a rally during the primaries in 2016. Most of the rioters who wreaked havoc after Trump’s election were euphemistically termed as protestors.

In the end, their hate knows no bound. Before Trump came along, their targets were President Reagan, Presidents Bush, Republicans, conservatives, people of faith, pro-lifers and anybody who disagrees with them. If nothing else they probably vicious feud among themselves.

To call it ‘Trump derangement syndrome’ only serves to accept their premise that Trump is the cause of their hatred. Their hate is irrational and despicable that what should be called.

Graphic credit: Max Pixel

The monsoons in Mumbai are particularly punishing especially when you are the sole occupant of  open-air rickshaw, engulfed in traffic beyond your range of vision. After several minutes the static traffic began to move, the collective noise of automobile engines was about to drown every sounds in the vicinity.

Suddenly a shrill wail penetrated through, the sort of cry that would cause the most heartless of individuals to shudder. Quite soon, it was discovered that a puppy had surreptitiously crept under a taxi cab to avoid the heavy rains. Everybody stepped out of their cars fearing the worst. Then the taxi driver emerged with the puppy in his arms, fortunately, it was only a minor limb injury.

For devout Hindus, the dog is sacred, the cab driver pledged to nurse the puppy to recovery and even adopt it.  People around tried to console the man who was clearly distraught by the accident. Then a young man in his early twenties rushed through the crowd, pushed his way all through to confront the driver.

He began by calling the driver a monster and went on to accuse him of not caring for lives, other than his. for. The taxi driver pleaded forgiveness with her asserting that it was an honest mistake. But he didn’t stop, he accused him of trying ‘murder’ a helpless animal. His voice turned louder as the accusations continued. The taxi driver stood there helplessly.

The young man by then tried to grab the taxi driver by his collar when he was restrained by the crowd, then cursed the driver wishing him a very painful death for ‘harm’ caused.  He then vowed to have the taxi driver ‘punished’. The police arrived and order was restrained.

                                                          ***

Several weeks later, on a Friday night, I was at a crowded restaurant with friends discussing politics. As always the discussion devolved into an argument but before we could even think of contemplate raising out decibels, a familiar voice drew everybody’s attention. The voice drowned every sound in the noisy restaurant.

Lo and behold it was the same young man, the animal rights activist. This time the dispute was about the meal served. When the server asked him to calm down so they could resolve the matter amicably, he accused him of being ‘inconsiderate’. Soon the manager arrived at the scene only to be viciously berated by the youth.

In minutes an elderly woman hurried toward the scene. She tried to pacify the unruly young man but to no avail. When she tried to convince the young man that the food served what she had ordered, before she stepped out for a phone call, his rage reached its peak.

“You never support me, always siding with the other. Enjoy your meal.” bellowed the youth as darted out of the restaurant.

The elderly woman said she was his mother profusely apologized to all, said that her son had a ‘temper problem’ but ‘a kind soul’, paid the bill and left.

                                                          ***

It struck me how my perception of the youth with a ‘temper problem’ changed. When he viciously attacked the cab driver over the injured animal, I viewed him from the prism of an individual who had deep compassion for animals. An individual who couldn’t restrain himself because she saw an innocent puppy in pain. I thought his reaction was extreme but on some level that it was from a good place. But the same behavior replicated at the restaurant showed that the outburst had very little to do with the injured puppy and all to do with him. It just that when he had found cause to hide behind and give him a license to behave badly

It struck me that this is no different from the ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’. We have seen Trump supporters sporting MAGA hats regularly incur the wrath of haters, Trump family members have been verbally attacked in airplanes and spat at in restaurants, Trump cabinet members being driven out of restaurants, the list of abominable behavior is endless.

Social media often plays a vital role in unmasking pretenders. In the absence of a pre-approved script and a visible audience, the visceral hate oozes out like septic puss. We have seen many people of ‘eminence’ scoff, scorn and even turn viciously abusive Trump and his supporters. They have called Donald Trump a traitor, a criminal, a Russian puppet and a con man. They have used expletives and vulgarities. Some have called for a coup, have called Trump’s youngest child to be attacked. They even wish for an assassination. They want to blacklist all Trump supporters rendering them jobless.

Like parasites who attach themselves to any host to serve their purpose. These deranged individuals have attached themselves to the host called  ‘The Resistance’. The purpose is to earn their vile behavior a backbone of morality. When people call them out they say ‘we are angry because Trump is in office’. They claim to be ‘custodians of empathy’ whose heart goes out for all the downtrodden that they claim are being hurt by Trump.

Beyond the glaring limelight, they have been known to leave viciously abusive voice messages for their daughter, threaten their assistant, and even physically attack people around them. The #MeToo movement has exposed many of them as sexual predators, destroying lives and careers and preying mercilessly on the innocent. Equally to blame are those who turned a blind eye toward the predators because they profited from them. So much for their morality and compassion.

Ironically Trump has implemented policies that they claim to stand for, such as criminal justice reform and pulling out of unnecessary wars. His strong economy means that everybody including people from minority groups, who they claim to stand for, are earning more and leading better lives.

The term ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ was coined to explain this irrational and inconsolable rage against Trump. But dig deeper and you find that much like the livid man at the restaurant, these are hateful individuals, and have serious anger management issues and personal problems. It’s just that Trump is the latest whom the can vent out on with impunity.

If this were just a few loons, the behavior could be ignored. But at the bottom of this, all is a blatant attempt delegitimize a democratically elected president without any evidence of wrongdoing. A lot of other unstable individuals out there feel empowered to conduct themselves in the most despicable manner because the eminent and prominent are doing it. An example is the shooting of Republican members of Congress by an individual at a softball practice back in 2017. It just takes one individual to opt for an extreme move.

Since the media is largely anti-Trump, the perpetrators know they will get a pass. In fact, CNN did a very favorable interview of an individual who tried to attack Trump at a rally during the primaries in 2016. Most of the rioters who wreaked havoc after Trump’s election were euphemistically termed as protestors.

In the end, their hate knows no bound. Before Trump came along, their targets were President Reagan, Presidents Bush, Republicans, conservatives, people of faith, pro-lifers and anybody who disagrees with them. If nothing else they probably vicious feud among themselves.

To call it ‘Trump derangement syndrome’ only serves to accept their premise that Trump is the cause of their hatred. Their hate is irrational and despicable that what should be called.

Graphic credit: Max Pixel

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Islamic slave markets flourish with high tech help

It has been going on for years; the UN says it is fighting modern slavery, and international civil servants are either corrupt or incompetent, because nothing changes. The BBC has discovered Islamic slave markets on Instagram and other applications.

A secret investigation by BBC News Arabic revealed that domestic workers are being bought and sold illegally online and that the market is booming, thanks to new technologies.

Go figure: it is the whites who are being asked to “repair” the slavery of the 18th century while turning a blind eye to the slavery of the 21st century.

Some of the transactions are carried out on Instagram, owned by Facebook, messages are promoted via hashtags and algorithms, and sales are negotiated via private messages.

Thousands of women are bought and sold as domestic or other workers.

Other messages are delivered by approved applications and provided by Google Play and Apple App Store, as well as on e-commerce platform websites.

“What they are doing is promoting an online slave market,” said Urmila Bhoola, UN Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery.

“If Google, Apple, Facebook or other companies host applications like these, they must be held accountable.”

After being alerted about this, Facebook said it had banned one of the hashtags involved. Google and Apple said they were working with application developers to prevent illegal activities.

However, the BBC has discovered that there are still many related lists active on Instagram, and other applications available through Apple and Google.

Slave Market

Nine out of ten Kuwaiti households have a domestic worker — they come from some of the poorest regions of the world.

Posing as a newly arrived couple in Kuwait, the BBC’s Arab infiltration team interviewed 57 application users and visited more than a dozen people who were trying to sell them their domestic workers through a popular application called “4Sale”.

Almost all vendors advocated confiscating women’s passports, locking them in the house, denying them leave and giving them little or no access to a telephone.

The “4Sale” application made it possible to filter by race, with different price ranges clearly proposed, according to the categories.

“African worker, clean and smiling,” says one of the announcements.

Another: “Nepalese who dares to ask for a day off.”

When talking to the sellers, the undercover team often heard racist comments. “Indians are the dirtiest,” said one of them, describing a woman being advertised.

Human rights violations? The media don’t care; they’ve decided that Islam is a religion of love.

The BBC team was encouraged by the users of the application, who acted as if they were the “owners” of these women, to deny them other fundamental human rights, such as giving them a “day or minute or second” holiday.

A man, a policeman, trying to get rid of his slave said: ”Believe me, she’s very sweet, she laughs and has a smiling face. Even if you keep her awake until 5:00 in the morning, she won’t complain.”

He explained to the BBC team how domestic slaves were used as a commodity.

“You will find someone who will buy a voucher for 600 KD ($2,000) and sell it for 1,000 KD ($3,300),” he says.

He suggested how the BBC team should treat her: “Don’t give her the passport. You are her godfather. Why give him her passport?”

In one case, the BBC team was offered a 16-year-old girl.

Fatou is a victim of the slave trade from Guinea in West Africa and was a domestic worker in Kuwait for six months when the BBC discovered her. Kuwait’s laws stipulate that domestic workers must be over 21 years of age.

Her landlord’s sales argument included the fact that she had not given Fatou a holiday, that her passport and phone had been taken away from her and that she had not allowed her to leave the house alone – which is illegal in Kuwait.

Authorization of the slave sponsor

“This is the ultimate example of modern slavery,” said Urmila Bhoola. “Here, we see a child sold and exchanged as movable property, as property.”

In most parts of the Gulf, “domestic workers” are brought into the country by “agencies” and are then officially registered with the government.

Potential “employers” pay remuneration to agencies and become the “official sponsor” of the domestic worker.

In the so-called Kafala system, a domestic worker cannot change or leave her job or leave the country without the permission of her sponsor.

In 2015, Kuwait passed laws to help protect domestic workers. But the law was not popular with everyone.

All over the Arab world

The online slave market is not only taking place in Kuwait but all over the Arab world.

However, to protect the image of Islam, the media and major international organizations are drowning the fish by pointing the finger at some Asian countries, incorporating the painful hours imposed on workers to a “form” of modern slavery. This allows them to help the Arab world save face, for reasons that are difficult to understand, since in general, the left touts the defense of human rights.

In Saudi Arabia, the survey revealed that hundreds of women were sold on “Haraj”, another popular application. There were hundreds more on Instagram, which belongs to Facebook.

The BBC team went to Guinea to try to contact Fatou’s family, the girl they had discovered for sale in Kuwait.

Every year, hundreds of women are victims of the black slave trade from Guinea to the Gulf.

Fatou was found by the Kuwaiti authorities and taken to a government-run reception center for domestic workers. Two days later, she was deported to Guinea because she was a minor. She told the BBC about her experience working in three homes during her nine months in Kuwait: “They were yelling at me and calling me an animal. It hurt me, it made me sad, but there was nothing I could do. »

She is now back at school in Conakry, where the BBC visited her.

“My life is better now. I just came back from slavery.”

When questioned by the BBC, the Kuwaiti government declared itself “at war with this kind of behavior” and insisted that the applications would be “highly scrutinized.”

To date, no significant action has been taken against the platforms.

There were no legal proceedings against the woman who tried to sell Fatou.

Since the BBC team contacted Silicon Valley applications and companies about the findings of their investigation, “4Sale” has removed the “domestic workers” section from its platform.

Facebook said it had banned the Arab hashtag “خادمات للتنازل#” – which translates as “#Housemaids”.

“We will continue to work with law enforcement, expert organizations and industry to prevent this behavior on our platforms,” added a Facebook spokesperson.

The Saudi application “Haraj” is still active.

Google said it was “deeply disturbed by these allegations.”  ”We asked the BBC to share additional details so that we could conduct a more in-depth investigation,” he added. “We ensure that application developers put in place the necessary protection measures to prevent individuals from carrying out this kind of activity on their platforms.

Apple has stated that it is “strictly prohibited” to promote human trafficking and child exploitation in the applications made available on its market. “Application developers are responsible for controlling user-generated content on their platforms,” he says. “We work with developers to take immediate corrective action whenever we find problems and, in extreme cases, we will remove the application. We also work with developers to report any illegality to local authorities.”

However, Apple and Google continue to distribute “4Sale” and “Haraj” applications, on the grounds that their main purpose is to sell legitimate goods and services.

“4Sale” may have addressed the problem, but at the time of publication, hundreds of domestic workers were still being exchanged on “Haraj,” Instagram and other applications that the BBC has seen.

PUBLISHED BY CHRISTIAN LARNET ON 2 NOVEMBER 2019

Reproduction authorized with the following mention: © Christian Larnet for Dreuz.info. Translated with the help of DeepL.

It has been going on for years; the UN says it is fighting modern slavery, and international civil servants are either corrupt or incompetent, because nothing changes. The BBC has discovered Islamic slave markets on Instagram and other applications.

A secret investigation by BBC News Arabic revealed that domestic workers are being bought and sold illegally online and that the market is booming, thanks to new technologies.

Go figure: it is the whites who are being asked to “repair” the slavery of the 18th century while turning a blind eye to the slavery of the 21st century.

Some of the transactions are carried out on Instagram, owned by Facebook, messages are promoted via hashtags and algorithms, and sales are negotiated via private messages.

Thousands of women are bought and sold as domestic or other workers.

Other messages are delivered by approved applications and provided by Google Play and Apple App Store, as well as on e-commerce platform websites.

“What they are doing is promoting an online slave market,” said Urmila Bhoola, UN Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Slavery.

“If Google, Apple, Facebook or other companies host applications like these, they must be held accountable.”

After being alerted about this, Facebook said it had banned one of the hashtags involved. Google and Apple said they were working with application developers to prevent illegal activities.

However, the BBC has discovered that there are still many related lists active on Instagram, and other applications available through Apple and Google.

Slave Market

Nine out of ten Kuwaiti households have a domestic worker — they come from some of the poorest regions of the world.

Posing as a newly arrived couple in Kuwait, the BBC’s Arab infiltration team interviewed 57 application users and visited more than a dozen people who were trying to sell them their domestic workers through a popular application called “4Sale”.

Almost all vendors advocated confiscating women’s passports, locking them in the house, denying them leave and giving them little or no access to a telephone.

The “4Sale” application made it possible to filter by race, with different price ranges clearly proposed, according to the categories.

“African worker, clean and smiling,” says one of the announcements.

Another: “Nepalese who dares to ask for a day off.”

When talking to the sellers, the undercover team often heard racist comments. “Indians are the dirtiest,” said one of them, describing a woman being advertised.

Human rights violations? The media don’t care; they’ve decided that Islam is a religion of love.

The BBC team was encouraged by the users of the application, who acted as if they were the “owners” of these women, to deny them other fundamental human rights, such as giving them a “day or minute or second” holiday.

A man, a policeman, trying to get rid of his slave said: ”Believe me, she’s very sweet, she laughs and has a smiling face. Even if you keep her awake until 5:00 in the morning, she won’t complain.”

He explained to the BBC team how domestic slaves were used as a commodity.

“You will find someone who will buy a voucher for 600 KD ($2,000) and sell it for 1,000 KD ($3,300),” he says.

He suggested how the BBC team should treat her: “Don’t give her the passport. You are her godfather. Why give him her passport?”

In one case, the BBC team was offered a 16-year-old girl.

Fatou is a victim of the slave trade from Guinea in West Africa and was a domestic worker in Kuwait for six months when the BBC discovered her. Kuwait’s laws stipulate that domestic workers must be over 21 years of age.

Her landlord’s sales argument included the fact that she had not given Fatou a holiday, that her passport and phone had been taken away from her and that she had not allowed her to leave the house alone – which is illegal in Kuwait.

Authorization of the slave sponsor

“This is the ultimate example of modern slavery,” said Urmila Bhoola. “Here, we see a child sold and exchanged as movable property, as property.”

In most parts of the Gulf, “domestic workers” are brought into the country by “agencies” and are then officially registered with the government.

Potential “employers” pay remuneration to agencies and become the “official sponsor” of the domestic worker.

In the so-called Kafala system, a domestic worker cannot change or leave her job or leave the country without the permission of her sponsor.

In 2015, Kuwait passed laws to help protect domestic workers. But the law was not popular with everyone.

All over the Arab world

The online slave market is not only taking place in Kuwait but all over the Arab world.

However, to protect the image of Islam, the media and major international organizations are drowning the fish by pointing the finger at some Asian countries, incorporating the painful hours imposed on workers to a “form” of modern slavery. This allows them to help the Arab world save face, for reasons that are difficult to understand, since in general, the left touts the defense of human rights.

In Saudi Arabia, the survey revealed that hundreds of women were sold on “Haraj”, another popular application. There were hundreds more on Instagram, which belongs to Facebook.

The BBC team went to Guinea to try to contact Fatou’s family, the girl they had discovered for sale in Kuwait.

Every year, hundreds of women are victims of the black slave trade from Guinea to the Gulf.

Fatou was found by the Kuwaiti authorities and taken to a government-run reception center for domestic workers. Two days later, she was deported to Guinea because she was a minor. She told the BBC about her experience working in three homes during her nine months in Kuwait: “They were yelling at me and calling me an animal. It hurt me, it made me sad, but there was nothing I could do. »

She is now back at school in Conakry, where the BBC visited her.

“My life is better now. I just came back from slavery.”

When questioned by the BBC, the Kuwaiti government declared itself “at war with this kind of behavior” and insisted that the applications would be “highly scrutinized.”

To date, no significant action has been taken against the platforms.

There were no legal proceedings against the woman who tried to sell Fatou.

Since the BBC team contacted Silicon Valley applications and companies about the findings of their investigation, “4Sale” has removed the “domestic workers” section from its platform.

Facebook said it had banned the Arab hashtag “خادمات للتنازل#” – which translates as “#Housemaids”.

“We will continue to work with law enforcement, expert organizations and industry to prevent this behavior on our platforms,” added a Facebook spokesperson.

The Saudi application “Haraj” is still active.

Google said it was “deeply disturbed by these allegations.”  ”We asked the BBC to share additional details so that we could conduct a more in-depth investigation,” he added. “We ensure that application developers put in place the necessary protection measures to prevent individuals from carrying out this kind of activity on their platforms.

Apple has stated that it is “strictly prohibited” to promote human trafficking and child exploitation in the applications made available on its market. “Application developers are responsible for controlling user-generated content on their platforms,” he says. “We work with developers to take immediate corrective action whenever we find problems and, in extreme cases, we will remove the application. We also work with developers to report any illegality to local authorities.”

However, Apple and Google continue to distribute “4Sale” and “Haraj” applications, on the grounds that their main purpose is to sell legitimate goods and services.

“4Sale” may have addressed the problem, but at the time of publication, hundreds of domestic workers were still being exchanged on “Haraj,” Instagram and other applications that the BBC has seen.

PUBLISHED BY CHRISTIAN LARNET ON 2 NOVEMBER 2019

Reproduction authorized with the following mention: © Christian Larnet for Dreuz.info. Translated with the help of DeepL.

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

President Trump’s Pledge to American Workers

President Trump’s Pledge to American Workers

According to K1FO News, President Trump’s agenda is driving an economic resurgence.  The President’s agenda is creating more and more opportunities for American workers.

  • More than 5.3 million jobs were created between President Trump’s election and his second State of the Union Address alone.
  • June 2019 marked the 16th consecutive month that America’s unemployment rate remained at 4 percent or below.
  • In early 2019, wage growth for U.S. workers hit its fastest pace in a decade.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Impeachment Resolution is a “Coup Resolution”—Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton

Just how is the impeachment investigation into President Trump highly irregular?

Why does Tom Fitton think there are more FISA abuses that might be uncovered in the soon-to-be-released Horowitz report?

And why does he think President Obama was ultimately responsible for the Spygate scandal?

.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://canadafreepress.com/

Larry C. Johnson: Growing Indicators of Brennan’s CIA Trump Task Force

Guest post by Larry C. Johnson

The average American has no idea how alarming is the news that former CIA Director John Brennan reportedly created and staffed a CIA Task Force in early 2016 that was named, Trump Task Force, and given the mission of spying on and carrying out covert actions against the campaign of candidate Donald Trump.

This was not a simple gathering of a small number of disgruntled Democrats working at the CIA who got together like a book club to grouse and complain about the brash real estate guy from New York. It was a specially designed covert action to try to destroy Donald Trump.

A “Task Force” is a special bureaucratic creation that provides a vehicle for bring case officers and analysts together, along with admin support, for a limited term project.  But it also can be expanded to include personnel from other agencies, such as the FBI, DIA and NSA. Task Forces have been used since the inception of the CIA in 1947. Here’s a recently declassified memo outlining the considerations in the creation of a task force in 1958.  The author, L.K. White, talks about the need for a coordinating Headquarters element and an Operational unit “in the field”, i.e. deployed around the world.

A Task Force operates independent of the CIA “Mission Centers” (that’s the jargon for the current CIA organization chart).

So what did John Brennan do? I am told by an knowledgeable source that Brennan created a Trump Task Force in early 2016. It was an invitation only Task Force. Specific case officers (i.e., men and women who recruit and handle spies overseas), analysts and admin personnel were recruited. Not everyone invited accepted the offer. But many did.

This was not a CIA only operation. Personnel from the FBI also were assigned to the Task Force. We have some clues that Christopher Steele’s FBI handler, Michael Gaeta, may have been detailed to the Trump Task Force (see here).

So what kind of things would this Task Force do? The case officers would work with foreign intelligence services such as MI-6, the Italians, the Ukrainians and the Australians on identifying intelligence collection priorities. Task Force members could task NSA to do targeted collection. They also would have the ability to engage in covert action, such as targeting George Papadopoulos. Joseph Mifsud may be able to shed light on the CIA officers who met with him, briefed on operational objectives regarding Papadopoulos and helped arrange monitored meetings. I think it is highly likely that the honey pot that met with George Papadopoulos, a woman named Azra Turk, was part of the CIA Trump Task Force.

The Task Force also could carry out other covert actions, such as information operations. A nice sounding euphemism for propaganda, and computer network operations. There has been some informed speculation that Guccifer 2.0 was a creation of this Task Force.

In light of what we have learned about the alleged CIA whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, there should be a serious investigation to determine if he was a part of this Task Force or, at minimum, reporting to them.

When I described this to one friend, a retired CIA Chief of Station, his first response was, “My God, that’s illegal.” We then reminisced about another illegal operation carried out under the auspices of the CIA Central American Task Force back in the 1980s. That became known to Americans as the Iran Contra scandal.

I sure hope that John Durham and his team are looking at this angle. If true it marks a new and damning indictment of the corruption of the CIA. Rather than spying on genuine foreign threats, this Task Force played a critical role in creating and feeding the meme that Donald Trump was a tool of the Russians and a puppet of Putin.

The post Larry C. Johnson: Growing Indicators of Brennan’s CIA Trump Task Force appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

President Clinton Committed 11 Crimes per Independent Counsel for Which He Was Impeached – President Trump Committed Nothing – What the Hell is Going On?

 

President Bill Clinton was impeached because an independent special counsel found that he committed 11 crimes, including multiple counts of lying and obstructing justice.

Today the Democrat led House is attempting to impeach President Donald Trump after a corrupt and biased Mueller Special Counsel found no crimes – zero!  What the hell is going on?

The far-left Washington Post listed all 11 crimes an independent counsel identified leading to President Clinton’s impeachment –

I. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton lied under oath as a defendant in Jones v. Clinton regarding his sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

(1) He denied that he had a “sexual relationship” with Monica Lewinsky
(2) He denied that he had a “sexual affair” with Monica Lewinsky
(3) He denied that he had “sexual relations” with Monica Lewinsky
(4) He denied that he engaged in or caused contact with the genitalia of “any person” with an intent to arouse or gratify (oral sex performed on him by Ms. Lewinsky)
(5) He denied that he made contact with Monica Lewinsky’s breasts or genitalia with an intent to arouse or gratify
A. Evidence that President Clinton Lied Under Oath During the Civil Case
1. President Clinton’s Statements Under Oath About Monica Lewinsky
2. Monica Lewinsky’s Testimony
(i) Wednesday, November 15, 1995
(ii) Friday, November 17, 1995
(iii) Sunday, December 31, 1995
(iv) Sunday, January 7, 1996
(v) Sunday, January 21, 1996
(vi) Sunday, February 4, 1996
(vii) Sunday, March 31, 1996
(viii) Sunday, April 7, 1996
(ix) Friday, February 28, 1997
(x) Saturday, March 29, 1997
(xi) Two Subsequent Meetings
3. Phone Sex
4. Physical Evidence
5. Testimony of Ms. Lewinsky’s Friends, Family Members, and Counselors
(i) Catherine Allday Davis
(ii) Neysa Erbland
(iii) Natalie Rose Ungvari
(iv) Ashley Raines
(v) Andrew Bleiler
(vi) Dr. Irene Kassorla
(vii) Linda Tripp
(viii) Debra Finerman
(ix) Dale Young
(x) Kathleen Estep
6. Summary

II. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton lied under oath to the grand jury about his sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

A. Background
B. The President’s Grand Jury Testimony
C. Summary

III. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton lied under oath during his civil deposition when he stated that he could not recall being alone with Monica Lewinsky and when he minimized the number of gifts they had exchanged.

A. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton lied under oath when he testified that he could not specifically recall instances in which he was alone with Monica Lewinsky.
1. The President’s Civil Deposition Testimony
2. Evidence That Contradicts the President’s Testimony
3. The President’s Grand Jury Testimony
4. Summary
B. There is substantial and credible information that the President lied under oath in his civil deposition about gifts he exchanged with Monica Lewinsky.
1. The President’s Civil Deposition Testimony About His Gifts to Monica Lewinsky
2. Evidence that Contradicts the President’s Civil Deposition Testimony
3. President’s Civil Deposition Testimony About Gifts from Monica Lewinsky to the President
4. Evidence that Contradicts the President’s Testimony
(i) Monica Lewinsky’s Testimony
5. Grand Jury Testimony of the President and Ms. Currie
6. Summary

IV. There is substantial and credible information that the President lied under oath during his civil deposition concerning conversations he had with Monica Lewinsky about her involvement in the Jones case.

A. Conversations with Ms. Lewinsky Regarding the Possibility of Her Testifying in the Jones Case
1. President Clinton’s Testimony in His Deposition
2. Evidence that Contradicts the President’s Civil Deposition Testimony
(i) Ms. Lewinsky’s Testimony
(ii) The President’s Grand Jury Testimony
3. Summary
B. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition when he denied knowing that Ms. Lewinsky had received her subpoena at the time he had last talked to her.
1. Evidence
2. Summary

V. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by engaging in a pattern of activity to conceal evidence regarding his relationship with Monica Lewinsky from the judicial process in the Jones case. The pattern included:

(i) concealment of gifts that the President had given Ms. Lewinsky and that were subpoenaed from Ms. Lewinsky in the Jones case; and
ii) concealment of a note sent by Ms. Lewinsky to the President on January 5, 1998.
A. Concealment of Gifts
1. Evidence Regarding Gifts
2. The President’s Grand Jury Testimony
3. Summary of Gifts
B. January 5, 1998, Note to the President
1. Evidence Regarding the January 5, 1998 Note
2. President Clinton’s Testimony
3. Summary on January 5, 1998, Note

VI. There is substantial and credible information that

(i) President Clinton and Ms. Lewinsky had an understanding that they would lie under oath in the Jones case about their relationship; and
(ii) President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by suggesting that Ms. Lewinsky file an affidavit so that she would not be deposed, she would not contradict his testimony, and he could attempt to avoid questions about Ms. Lewinsky at his deposition.
A. Evidence Regarding Affidavit and Use of Affidavit
B. Summary of President’s Grand Jury Testimony
C. Evidence Regarding Cover Stories
D. The President’s Grand Jury Testimony on Cover Stories
E. Summary

VII. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by helping Ms. Lewinsky obtain a job in New York at a time when she would have been a witness against him were she to tell the truth during the Jones case.

A. Evidence
B. Summary

VIII. There is substantial and credible information that the President lied under oath in describing his conversations with Vernon Jordan about Ms. Lewinsky.

A. President’s Testimony in the Jones Case
B. Evidence That Contradicts the President’s Civil Deposition
C. Summary

IX. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by attempting to influence the testimony of Betty Currie.

A. Evidence
1. Saturday, January 17, 1998, Deposition
2. Sunday, January 18, 1998, Meeting with Ms. Currie
3. Conversation Between the President and Ms. Currie on Tuesday, January 20, 1998, or Wednesday, January 21, 1998.
B. The President’s Grand Jury Testimony
C. Summary

X. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice during the federal grand jury investigation. While refusing to testify for seven months, he simultaneously lied to potential grand jury witnesses knowing that they would relay the falsehoods to the grand jury.

A. The Testimony of Current and Former Aides
1. John Podesta
2. Erskine Bowles
3. Sidney Blumenthal
4. Harold Ickes
B. The President’s Grand Jury Testimony
C. Summary

XI. There is substantial and credible information that President Clinton’s actions since January 17, 1998, regarding his relationship with Monica Lewinsky have been inconsistent with the President’s constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws.

A. Beginning on January 21, 1998, the President misled the American people and Congress regarding the truth of his relationship with Ms. Lewinsky.
B. The First Lady, the Cabinet, the President’s staff, and the President’s associates relied on and publicly emphasized the President’s denial.
C. The President repeatedly and unlawfully invoked the Executive Privilege to conceal evidence of his personal misconduct from the grand jury.
D. The President refused six invitations to testify to the grand jury, thereby delaying expeditious resolution of this matter, and then refused to answer relevant questions before the grand jury when he testified in August 1998.
E. The President misled the American people and the Congress in his public statement on August 17, 1998, when he stated that his answers at his civil deposition in January had been “legally accurate.”

Here is a list of all the crimes President Trump committed leading to the current corrupt impeachment hearings going on by the corrupt Democrat House –

Zero-nadda-none

The corrupt Mueller Special Counsel gang led by the most conflicted, biased and criminal gang of Democrat crooks in US history could not find a single crime after spending $40 million of tax payer money on a fraudulent ‘Russia Collusion’ scam.

The President was never allowed to defend himself or call out in court any of the abuses and crimes the Mueller gang took part in during the scandalous investigation.

Today the Democrats are creating their own investigation of a phone call President Trump had with the newly elected Ukrainian leader into their own hands.

1. The Democrats investigation is taking place in the Democrat led House.

2. They are holding it behind closed doors in a room in the basement of the capital.

3. They are leaking anti-Trump smears daily as a result of their investigation.

4. The corrupt media is doing all it can to promote the fraudulent investigation, like it did with the fraudulent Mueller sham.

5. The Republicans are not allowed to call witnesses.

6. Only one person in Congress knows who the whistleblower is – the same individual who is running the sham investigation – Lying and chronically dishonest Adam Schiff.

7. Schiff and the Democrats are interrupting any questions allowed by the Republicans in the House.

8. Schiff is coaching witnesses.

9.Schiff is allowing witnesses not to answer Republican questions.

10. Schiff is withholding transcripts of interviews from Republicans.

11. The President is not allowed to rebut any accusations or even have his lawyers present in the meetings.

What the hell is going on? This is not my America! This is a kangaroo court in a banana republic brought to you by Representatives from New York and California and the left coasts.

The post President Clinton Committed 11 Crimes per Independent Counsel for Which He Was Impeached – President Trump Committed Nothing – What the Hell is Going On? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com