British Scientists May Have Found Cure For Cancer. By Accident.

British scientists may have discovered a cure for cancer — by accident.

As The Telegraph reports, “Researchers at Cardiff University were analyzing blood from a bank in Wales, looking for immune cells that could fight bacteria, when they found an entirely new type of T-cell. That new immune cell carries a never-before-seen receptor which acts like a grappling hook, latching on to most human cancers, while ignoring healthy cells.”

What makes this new discovery so exciting is that prior therapies, referred to as CAR-T and TCR-T therapies, which use immune cells to attach to HLA molecules on cancer cells’ surface, fight cancer but are incapable of fighting solid tumors. As The Telegraph points out, HLA molecules vary in people, but the new therapy attaches to a molecule called MR1, which does not vary in humans, which gives it the chance of fighting most cancers and additionally means people could share the treatment, allowing banks of the cells to be stored and thus be offered quickly to people suffering from the disease.

Immune cells from the new treatment have killed lung, skin, blood, colon, breast, bone, prostate, ovarian, kidney and cervical cancer cells. The study stated:

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-independent, T cell-mediated targeting of cancer cells would allow immune destruction of malignancies in all individuals. Here, we use genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screening to establish that a T cell receptor recognized and killed most human cancer types via the monomorphic MHC class-I related protein, MR1, while remaining inert to noncancerous cells … These finding offer opportunities for HLA-independent, pan-cancer, pan-population immunotherapies.

The study concluded, “In summary, we describe a TCR that exhibits pan-cancer recognition via the variant MR1 molecule, and, by equipping patients with melanoma T cells that lacked detectable cancer reactivity with the MC.7 G5 TCR, we rendered the T-cells capable of killing autologous melanoma.”

Professor Andrew Sewell, lead author on the study, enthused to the Telegraph, “This was a serendipitous finding, nobody knew this cell existed. Our finding raises the prospect of a ‘one-size-fits-all’ cancer treatment, a single type of T-cell that could be capable of destroying many different types of cancers across the population. Previously nobody believed this could be possible.”

Astonishingly,T-cells of skin cancer patients altered by the treatment were apparently capable of killing the patient’s cancer cells and other patients’ cancer cells as well. The team of researchers posited that trials on terminally ill patients could conceivably start in November.

Professor Oliver Ottmann, Cardiff University’s Head of Haematology, stated: “This new type of T-cell therapy has enormous potential to overcome current limitations of CAR-T, which has been struggling to identify suitable and safe targets for more than a few cancer types.”

Professor Awen Gallimore of Cardiff University’s division of infection and immunity and cancer immunology lead for the Wales Research Centre, added, “If this transformative new finding holds up, it will lay the foundation for a ‘universal’ T-cell medicine, mitigating against the tremendous costs associated with the identification, generation and manufacture of personalized T-cells.  This is truly exciting and potentially a great step forward for the accessibility of cancer immunotherapy.”

The research was published here.

 

 

 

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

CREEPY AND BIZARRE: Biden Has INSANE Meltdown on Reporter When Asked About His Attacks on Sanders (VIDEO)

Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden had an extremely bizarre and unsettling reaction to a reporter asking him about his latest attacks on fellow candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Appearing at a campaign event in Mason City, Iowa, Biden was asked by Ed O’Keefe of CBS why he continued to attack Sanders, despite accepting his apology over an op-ed by one of the Vermont senator’s surrogates, which called the former Vice President “corrupt.”

In response to the question, Biden turned to the reporter and repeatedly shouted “why why why why why why” before telling the reporter to “calm down,” adding “you’re getting nervous, man.”

Biden went on to say that Sanders apologized for saying he was corrupt, but did not say anything about whether or not he was telling the truth about social security.

True to form, Biden had his hands all over the reporter during the incredibly creepy exchange — even jabbing him in the chest before walking away.

The post CREEPY AND BIZARRE: Biden Has INSANE Meltdown on Reporter When Asked About His Attacks on Sanders (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Texas Church Hero: Bloomberg’s Gun Controls Would Have Meant ‘Carnage’

Texas church hero Jack Wilson said that Democrat presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg’s gun control positions would have rendered congregants defenseless on the day of the church attack.

On December 29, 2019, an attacker opened fire on congregants at the West Freeway Church of Christ in White Settlement, Texas. Within second the attacker was killed by armed congregant Wilson, while other armed congregants also drew their guns and walked toward the shooter.

On December 30, 2019, Breitbart News reported Wilson commenting on his actions, saying, “I feel like I killed evil.”

Bloomberg addressed the Texas church shooting by saying he does not believe congregants should be armed.

On January 3, 2020, Breitbart News reported that Bloomberg did praise the heroics of armed congregants, but said gun possession ought to be reserved for law enforcement.

Wilson warned that Bloomberg’s gun control would have cost congregants’ lives the day of the attack, because they would have been defenseless until police arrived, Fox News reported.

He said, “Even though the White Settlement police department did arrive in roughly two minutes from the time the first call went it, by that time…the carnage would have been much, much worse.”

Wilson suggested that if Bloomberg would give up his armed guards he could better understand the struggle of the common man.

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Florida GOP Leader Joe Gruters: Politicians Are Afraid of Standing Up to Big Tech

Florida state senator and GOP chairman Joe Gruters joined Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow on Breitbart News Daily Tuesday to discuss his bill to defeat social media censorship.

Identifying the social media giants as the new “digital public square,” Sen. Gruters said censorship is a “First Amendment thing — it’s freedom of speech, the right to be out there, the right to be heard.”

Gruters went on to thank Breitbart News for helping to spread the truth about social media censorship.

“This is the second time we’ve brought it up. The good news is there’s momentum growing. There are now fourteen variations of this same bill that [have] now been introduced across the country. And it’s bipartisan — we’ve got [state] senator Gabbard to introduce it in Hawaii of all places, the father of the presidential candidate.”

“I think it’s unfair that conservatives are being targeted [in] the way that they are. I think we need to step up, and I think we need to realize that these large social media companies [are] the digital public square.”

“I never see [Breitbart’s] news in the Google searches, it never comes up. They definitely suppress conservative voices.”

“We are in the fight for our lives in this presidential cycle, there’s no question about it. We’re fortunate here in Florida to have America’s most popular governor, Ron DeSantis, and that’s really going to help us carry the day.”

“A lot of times these bills take a couple of years to filter through the system. I think we can get a senate hearing this year; I’m hoping to move it past one or two committees. I think we’re still a year out from passing the actual bill — so I don’t think it will happen in 2020, I’m thinking maybe 2021… [but] there’s an outside chance we could pass it this year.”

“We’re going to push, and do everything we possibly can, but this a difficult subject — a lot of people don’t want to take on these big social media companies because they’re afraid of the repercussions. And listen, they are heavy-handed, they do play a role in the political system here in Florida, and no-one wants to get on their bad side.”

“The problem, as a candidate, if you get banned — look at Laura Loomer: she can’t do anything on social media, she can’t even take an Uber or a Lyft, she’s been banned from all the platforms — it is a problem … Look at everyone looking at their phones, all day long, they’re on all these social media giants, checking their status, checking other people, and when you can’t communicate, for me, it comes right back to violating your freedom of speech and being able to be out there in the digital public square and say your peace.”

“We’ve got to continue to push this across the country — once we get one state that passes it, hopefully it [gives] courage and strength to other leaders around the country to do the same thing, to make sure we protect conservative candidates and conservatives overall from being censored.”

Are you an insider at Google, Facebook, Twitter or any other tech company who wants to confidentially reveal wrongdoing or political bias at your company? Reach out to Allum Bokhari at his secure email address allumbokhari@protonmail.com

Allum Bokhari is the senior technology correspondent at Breitbart News.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Florida Voters Reject Impeachment, Back Trump in New Poll

A poll of Florida voters released Tuesday shows a majority of Sunshine State voters are opposed to removing President Trump from office over impeachment charges and that Trump leads all major Democrat rivals.

President kicked off his 2020 reelection campaign with a massive rally at the 20,000 seat Amway Center in Orlando, Florida June 18, 2019.

President Trump speaks at his 2020 reelection campaign kickoff rally at the Amway Center, Orlando, FL, June 18, by Kristinn Taylor

President Trump looks out at cheering supporters following speech at his 2020 reelection campaign kickoff rally at the Amway Center, Orlando, FL, June 18, by Kristinn Taylor

The poll by the Florida Chamber of Commerce also shows Republican Governor Ron DeSantis with overwhelming approval, 68%, a little over a year after he won a squeaker election with help from Trump who campaigned for him at rallies held the days before the election.

The poll is broken down by Republicans, Democrats and independents. Trump is underwater from independents while receiving very strong support from Republicans. The surge for Trump in Florida is coming from a surprising level of support from Florida Democrats.

After impeachment, should President Trump be removed from office?
TOTAL VOTERS: 52% disapprove, 43% approve
DEMOCRATS: 73% approve, 20% disapprove
NPAs: 50% approve, 46% disapprove
REPUBLICANS: 87% disapprove, 9% approve

Presidential Head-to-Heads

Head-to-Head DEM REP NPA

Trump/Biden 49/45 16/78 88/7 41/51

Trump/Warren 50/43 17/75 90/7 41/50

Trump/Bloomberg 49/44 16/75 87/8 40/53

Trump/Buttigieg 50/43 19/72 87/9 40/51

Methodology: “The Florida Chamber of Commerce political poll was conducted on January 3-12,2020 by Cherry Communications during live telephone interviews of likely voters, and has a margin of error of +/- 4 percent. The sample size included 247 Democrats, 241 Republicans and 120 Others for a total of 608 respondents statewide. The samples for the polls conducted by the Florida Chamber are consistently drawn from likely voters and newly registered voters, meaning those voters who have the propensity and past performance of voting in elections, rather than simply including registered voters. Voters are again screened for likelihood of voting.”

The poll also focused on state and small business issues. All results at this link.

The post Florida Voters Reject Impeachment, Back Trump in New Poll appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Schiff Admits In Senate Trial That Impeachment About Stopping Trump Re-Election

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), who is serving as a Democratic impeachment manager during President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial, admitted on Wednesday that Democrats’ partisan impeachment was about stopping the president from being re-elected.

“The House did not take this extraordinarily step lightly,” Schiff began. “As we will discuss, impeachment exists for cases in which the conduct of the president rises beyond mere policies, disputes to be decided otherwise, and without urgency at the ballot box.”

“Instead, we are here today to consider a much more grave matter and that is an attempt to use the powers of the presidency to cheat in an election,” Schiff continued. “For precisely this reason, the president’s misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box, for we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won.”

WATCH:

Numerous top Democrats have essentially admitted that their pursuit of having Trump removed from office was about stopping him from being re-elected.

In May, Rep. Al Green (D-TX) said, “I’m concerned that if we don’t impeach this president, he will get re-elected.”

Also in May, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “We have to make sure — this will sound political but we have to make sure that the Constitution wins the next presidential election. We can’t be worrying about well, how long is this going to take? Well, that will take as long as it does. And we will press the case so that in the court of public opinion. People will know what is — is right. But we cannot accept a second term for Donald Trump if we are going to be faithful to our democracy and to the Constitution of the United States.”

In November, socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, “At the end of the day, we have to be able to come together as a caucus and if it is this Ukrainian allegation that is what brings the caucus together, um, then I think we have to run with however we unify the House. We also need to move quite quickly because we’re talking about the potential compromise of the 2020 elections,” Ocasio-Cortez continued. “And so this is not just about something that has occurred; this is about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year.”

Last month, Green told C-SPAN that there was “no limit” to the number of times that Democrats could pursue impeaching Trump.

“A president can be impeached more than once,” Green said. “So, we can do this, we can move forward with what we have on the table currently, we can take this before the Senate and we can still investigate other issues and when the president has committed additional offenses, and my suspicion is that he will, we can take those before the Senate.”

“There is no limit on the number of times the Senate can vote to convict or not a president, no limit to the number of times the House can vote to impeach or not a president,” Green continued. “So, my belief is that the speaker will probably say we’re going to move forward with what we have now, but we’re not going to end investigations and that there may be possible opportunities to do other things at a later time.”

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Sanders Group Hit With Complaint Over Alleged Campaign Finance Violations

Bernie Sanders

A group founded by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) was hit with a complaint alleging that it violated campaign finance laws by accepting contributions that exceed federal limits.

Our Revolution, a nonprofit established by Sanders, is at the center of a new complaint filed Wednesday to the Federal Election Commission by watchdog group Common Cause. An attorney for the watchdog said the pro-Sanders group violated the law by backing the Vermont senator’s presidential candidacy without registering with the FEC.

"Because Sanders set up Our Revolution and they have raised and spent money in candidate elections, Our Revolution is required to comply with contribution limits, register with the FEC, and disclose its donors—but it hasn’t," Paul S. Ryan, an attorney for Common Cause, told the Associated Press. "It’s his establishment of the group that triggers these laws. That means a $5,000 limit, full donor disclosure and no contributions from prohibited sources."

Under FEC regulations, groups established by political candidates cannot "solicit, receive, direct, transfer, or spend funds" for federal election activity that exceeds legal limits. Individual contributions to a campaign are capped at $2,800 per election, while contributions to a political action committee are capped at $5,000.

The new complaint comes as Sanders has surged in national polls ahead of next month’s Iowa caucus.

While Sanders has assailed big money donors and undisclosed cash in politics, Our Revolution has taken large checks while hiding its funding sources. The group has received nearly $1 million in contributions, including six-figure donations. It is working to increase voter turnout for Sanders and has spent money on social media advertisements.

Our Revolution did not respond to a request for comment.

The post Sanders Group Hit With Complaint Over Alleged Campaign Finance Violations appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

Media Interest in Jeffrey Epstein Heightens Amid Scrutiny of Environmental Record

Media interest in Jeffrey Epstein, the sexual deviant and Democratic donor who was most likely murdered in his jail cell in 2019, has ticked up amid scrutiny of the late pedophile’s environmental record.

CNN reports that a U.S. Virgin Islands lawsuit against the multi-millionaire pervert’s estate accuses Epstein of having "potentially damaged the delicate environment with illegal construction projects and brushed aside fines and other efforts to curb his behavior." These alleged environmental offenses, according to the lawsuit, were "part of a pattern of behavior in flouting the laws of the Virgin Islands and holding [Epstein] above the law."

Perhaps if American journalists had known of Epstein’s environmental crimes much earlier, they might have been compelled to report on the massive international sex-trafficking ring Epstein allegedly oversaw. The U.S. media took credit for Epstein’s arrest in July 2019—credit it certainly did not deserve.

The increased public scrutiny on Epstein’s egregious criminal activity, coming more than a decade after the financier negotiated a sweetheart plea deal with federal prosecutors in Florida, was the result of a local newspaper (the Miami Herald) pursuing a Donald Trump-related angle to the story. Trump’s former secretary of labor, Alexander Acosta, signed off on Epstein’s plea deal while serving as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida.

Indeed, in the absence of a connection linking Epstein to Trump, the U.S. media was for years reluctant to publish credible allegations against the wealthy pedophile. As early as 2002, Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter killed a story on Epstein’s inappropriate relationships with underage girls after Epstein objected. In 2019, leaked video showed ABC News anchor Amy Robach complaining that she "had this [Epstein] story for three years" and criticizing the network for repeatedly refusing to air her interview with one of Epstein’s alleged victims.

If only Greta Thunberg had been around to put him on blast for polluting the sea.

The post Media Interest in Jeffrey Epstein Heightens Amid Scrutiny of Environmental Record appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

Poll: Two-Thirds of Americans Want Candidate Who Supports ‘Significant Restrictions’ on Abortion

Democratic presidential candidates have eagerly embraced radical pro-abortion stances, but two-thirds of Americans want to vote for political candidates who favor "significant restrictions" on abortion, according to a recent poll.

The annual Marist poll commissioned by the Knights of Columbus showed that 55 percent of Americans identify as pro-choice. However, 70 percent of the country, including nearly half of self-described pro-choice respondents, oppose all abortions or believe they should be permitted only during the first 12 weeks, in medical emergencies, or in cases of rape or incest.

The data do not bode well for the leading Democratic presidential candidates, all of whom espouse ambitious pro-abortion policy platforms. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) wants to install a federal statutory right that "parallels the constitutional right in Roe v. Wade" and prohibit states from restricting abortion in later months of pregnancy. Former vice president Joe Biden also capitulated to a progressive outcry last year and committed himself to oppose the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding for abortion through Medicaid.

Most Americans oppose these policy positions put forth by the presidential contenders, according to the poll. Three-in-five Americans want the Supreme Court to reinterpret Roe v. Wade to either abolish all abortions or allow states to impose certain restrictions on abortion, and 60 percent of the country opposes the use of taxpayer money to fund abortion. Support for such restrictions crosses ideological lines, including many people who want abortion to remain legal.

"The variation of what people mean when they say pro-choice runs the gamut from so-called abortion-on-demand to really substantial restrictions," Andrew Walther, vice president of the Knights of Columbus, said during a press call. "So, that label as an indicator of position is largely meaningless."

President Donald Trump has enacted several pro-life policies in office. He has reinstated the Mexico City policy, which prohibits government funding to NGOs that promote abortion abroad. He has also prohibited recipients of federal Title X family planning programs from advising patients to seek abortion except in case of rape, incest, or medical emergency. Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, dropped out of the program, rather than comply.

The general public tends to support Trump’s policy on abortion. For example, more than 75 percent of Americans oppose using tax dollars to support abortion in other countries.

The survey found that pro-life Americans are more likely than their pro-choice counterparts to consider a presidential candidate’s abortion stance as a "major factor" when deciding their vote. Furthermore, while 78 percent of Democrats identify as pro-choice, more than two-in-five of them support some sort of "significant restriction" on abortion.

Pollsters interviewed more than 1,200 adults across the United States in early January. The results are statistically significant within a margin of 3.7 percent.

The post Poll: Two-Thirds of Americans Want Candidate Who Supports ‘Significant Restrictions’ on Abortion appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

HE DID IT AGAIN! LIAR Adam Schiff Makes Up ANOTHER Fake Trump Quote in His Opening Argument (VIDEO)

Adam Schiff went off on a deranged Trump-Russia screed during his opening arguments at the Senate Impeachment Trial.

Schiff went from lie to conspiracy throughout his more than an hour long opening argument.

It was outrageous and insane!

Schiff opened up calling President Trump a “king” and “cheat” and then moved on to assert that President Trump is a puppet of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

At one point in his speech Adam Schiff played a joke by Trump at one of his massive rallies as EVIDENCE of wrongdoing!
It was a joke!

And then around 1 hour and 45 minutes into his speech Adam Schiff made up another fake conversation between President Trump and President Zelensky.

Adam Schiff: And I know this is astonishing. So much of the last few years has been a combination of shock and no surprise. And yet even when the president is saying, no quid pro quo, what does he say? “Zelensky must publicly announce the two political investigations and he should want to do it,” No quid pro quo except this quid pro quo.

This is a COMPLETE FAKE QUOTE!

Adam Schiff assigns this quote to Trump, as if it is confirmed that President Trump said this. Schiff lied in the House and made up the Zelensky/Trump conversation, not realizing that president Trump would release the complete transcript.
Today he lied in the senate, repeatedly.

This is a complete new lie. Schiff is the U. S. House’s Baron von Munchausen. He appears to suffer from Munchausen Syndrome since he can’t stop his lies.

The post HE DID IT AGAIN! LIAR Adam Schiff Makes Up ANOTHER Fake Trump Quote in His Opening Argument (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com