Wikipedia Allows New Category For Rush Limbaugh Under ‘List of Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients’ — ‘Hatemongers’

On Tuesday, radio superstar Rush Limbaugh attended the State of the Union address at the Capitol. There, one day after he announced he had advanced lung cancer, the 69-year-old Limbaugh was awarded the prestigious Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Liberals’ heads exploded. They trotted out all the same old saws to decry the move, especially their favorite, that Limbaugh is racist.

So we popped over to Wikipedia to see who various presidents had awarded with the prize. There, we saw the recipients were broken into 18 categories. Here are 17 of them:

1. Arts
2. Business and economics
3. Computing
4. Education
6. History
7. Humanitarian
8. Law
9. Media
10. Medicine
11. Military
12. Philanthropy
13. Philosophy
14. Politics and government
15. Religion
16. Science
17. Space exploration
18. Sports

But even before we started reading through the names, category No. 5 caught our eye.

5. Hatemongers.

Wait, there’s a whole category of “hatemongers” who have won the Presidential Medal of Freedom?! Right away we click on that link. Here’s what it says:

“Rush Limbaugh, 2020.”

Seriously. See the picture above.

Wikipedia is a ridiculously biased site. But calling Limbaugh a “hatemonger” is really beyond the pale.

 

The post Wikipedia Allows New Category For Rush Limbaugh Under ‘List of Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients’ — ‘Hatemongers’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

“Acquitted For Life” GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy Trolls Pelosi, Rips Up Articles of Impeachment (VIDEO)

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) trolled Speaker Pelosi after the Senate voted to acquit President Trump.

The Senate on Wednesday voted to acquit President Trump on both articles of impeachment.

Article 1 “Abuse of Power” — Not Guilty! 52-48

Article 2 “Obstruction of Congress” — Not Guilty! 53-47

McCarthy ripped up the bogus articles of impeachment and posted the video to his official Twitter account.

“Acquitted for life,” McCarthy said as he tore the articles of impeachment in half.

WATCH:

In an appalling lack of respect for the House, the country and the President, Speaker Pelosi ripped up President Trump’s SOTU speech Tuesday night.

The post “Acquitted For Life” GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy Trolls Pelosi, Rips Up Articles of Impeachment (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

‘The View’ Complains Medal of Freedom Is for People Who ‘Did Stuff’ – Remember Who Obama Gave It To?

Even cast of “The View” doesn’t usually put its ignorance on view like this.

Regular watchers of ABC’s daily dose of harping shrews had a new chance to witness witlessness in action on Wednesday, when Whoopi Goldberg and her crew decided to take on President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address.

Among other things, the carping coven decided to bash Trump’s decision to award conservative commentator and genuine American change agent Rush Limbaugh with a Medal of Freedom on live television, with the assistance of first lady Melania Trump.

Naturally, Goldberg and most of her co-hosts weren’t happy with the decision – anyone even vaguely familiar with Rush and “The View” knows they aren’t exactly simpatico. (In fact, it was about as predictable as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s sophomoric reaction to the news.)

But complaining, as Goldberg did, that Rush didn’t deserve a medal because it should go to “people who actually did stuff” not only ignored what the radio icon has accomplished over the past three decades, it showed a basic misunderstanding of what the medal is about – and the kind of characters President Barack Obama decided to favor with it, too.

TRENDING: Super Bowl Halftime Show Contained a Subtle Anti-Trump Immigration Message

Check out “The View” segment here:

Has Gloria Estefan done something more important than Rush Limbaugh? Obama gave the medal to former Miami Sound Machine frontwoman in November 2015, according to White House archives.

Did Rush Limbaugh deserve the Medal of Freedom?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

Has cellist Yo-Yo Ma had more impact than Rush? Obama gave Ma the medal in November 2010. (That might have been because he appeared at Obama’s inauguration in 2009, though even NPR had to admit the performance was faked — one of the early signs that honesty wasn’t going to be a hallmark of the Obama years.)

Or, God help us, Joe Biden?

Biden got the Medal of Freedom from Obama in a Stalinesque ceremony conducted in the Obama administration’s dying days. (It was Jan. 12, 2017, as NPR reported at the time – a scant eight days before Trump’s inauguration.)

Not only did Biden get the medal, it was awarded “with distinction.” That’s some pretty rarified air. Only 26 people have received the upgraded version of the medal, and as The Christian Post reported when Biden received it, at the time the previous three recipients were Pope John Paul II, former President Ronald Reagan, and former Secretary of State and former four-star Gen. Colin Powell.

One of them is now a Catholic saint, one of them won the Cold War for the West. And Powell actually received the medal twice — from Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton — the second time “with distinction.”

RELATED: Joy Behar Marks MLK Day with 2 Indefensible Lies About Donald Trump

It’s would be hard for even an occasionally irrational liberal like Goldberg to argue Biden belongs in that company – if he weren’t running for president in 2020, it’s a fair bet he would have been consigned to the history books already as an inconsequential footnote to Obama’s disastrous eight years in power.

(The fact that Obama has not endorsed Biden for the presidency might be a good indication that that “with distinction” business wasn’t all that sincere.)

Rush Limbaugh, meanwhile, has been a genuine cultural force in the United States for more than 30 years.

As usual on social media, liberals were out in force celebrating “The View’s” liberal party line, but there were quite a few sane users too.

 

But this one put it perfectly.

It’s a common misconception that the Medal of Freedom is a kind of civilian equivalent to the Medal of Honor, but it’s not even close. The Medal of Honor is reserved for acts of bravery that are extraordinary even by the extraordinary standards of the U.S. military.

The Medial of Freedom isn’t quite that. Some receive it for genuine meritorious service to the country — like comedy legend Bob Hope getting it in 1963 for his commitment to entertaining American troops abroad. For others, it’s basically an acknowledgment that Very Important People think they’re very important too.

Rush Limbaugh is one of the ones who earned it.

It’s no exaggeration to say he helped transform the political life of the American Republic, from the 1990s on – earning honorary membership in the congressional class of 1995 after the Gingrich revolution engineered the first Republican takeover of the House of Representatives in 40 years. (It must have pained The New York Times to report that.)

Through the Clinton years, through the George W. Bush years, through the Obama years, Rush Limbaugh has been one of the premier spokesmen for the conservative movement – with an impact on American culture few could hope to match.

The harpies on “The View” will never admit it — along with Wednesday’s guest Alec Baldwin — but it would take Joe Biden winning the presidency to even get close to Limbaugh. (And not to pick on Gloria Estafan or Yo Y o Ma, but most other recipients of the medal don’t have a prayer.)

Goldberg and her co-hosts are free to disparage their betters like Rush Limbaugh all they want – it’s a free country.

But they could at least keep their ignorance a little more out of view.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

ICYMI: Here Are the 8 Best Lines from Trump’s State of the Union Address

Hey, we’re all busy people, and perhaps you missed President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address Tuesday night. Nancy Pelosi certainly wished she did, after all, given the fact that she ripped up the paper with the speech on it after spending the entire night looking like she was going to cry.

If you didn’t get the chance to watch, here are eight of Trump’s best lines from the evening:

1) “Socialism destroys nations. But always remember: Freedom unifies the soul.”

For the first time in recent memory, there were scads of actual socialists in the audience at the State of the Union. A socialist had actually come close to winning the Iowa caucuses. (And, given how strange the rules were, could technically have said he won.) And yet, socialism is destroying countries like Venezuela and Bolivia as we speak.

At times like these, it’s good to remember how freedom is always the best medicine.

TRENDING: Super Bowl Halftime Show Contained a Subtle Anti-Trump Immigration Message

2) “Three years ago, we launched the great American comeback. Tonight, I stand before you to share the incredible results. Jobs are booming, incomes are soaring, poverty is plummeting, crime is falling, confidence is surging, and our country is thriving and highly respected again! America’s enemies are on the run, America’s fortunes are on the rise, and America’s future is blazing bright.

“The years of economic decay are over. The days of our country being used, taken advantage of, and even scorned by other nations are long behind us. Gone too are the broken promises, jobless recoveries, tired platitudes, and constant excuses for the depletion of American wealth, power, and prestige.

“In just three short years, we have shattered the mentality of American decline, and we have rejected the downsizing of America’s destiny. We have totally rejected the downsizing. We are moving forward at a pace that was unimaginable just a short time ago, and we are never, ever going back.”

Remember how Barack Obama said that there was no way that one could wave a magic wand and make jobs come back? Well, call Donald Trump the Harry Potter of the White House, because we have record-low unemployment, wage growth, a phase-one deal with China that actually involves respect for our intellectual property and all sorts of other winning. We’re not sick of winning yet.

Do you think Donald Trump gave a good State of the Union address?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

3) “Charles McGee was born in Cleveland, Ohio, one century ago. Charles is one of the last surviving Tuskegee Airmen — the first black fighter pilots … After more than 130 combat missions in World War II, he came back to a country still struggling for civil rights and went on to serve America in Korea and Vietnam.

“On Dec. 7th, Charles celebrated his 100th birthday. A few weeks ago, I signed a bill promoting Charles McGee to Brigadier General. And earlier today, I pinned the stars on his shoulders in the Oval Office. General McGee: Our nation salutes you.”

You can’t add much to that, other than to offer profuse thanks to a man who gave his all for a country that viewed him as a second-class citizen — and then fought for it again, twice. Hero is a word too often used, and yet it’s insufficient for this great man.

4) “Almost every American family knows the pain when a loved one is diagnosed with a serious illness. Here tonight is a special man, beloved by millions of Americans who just received a Stage 4 advanced cancer diagnosis. This is not good news, but what is good news is that he is the greatest fighter and winner that you will ever meet. Rush Limbaugh, thank you for your decades of tireless devotion to our country.

“And, Rush, in recognition of all that you have done for our nation, the millions of people a day that you speak to and that you inspire, and all of the incredible work that you have done for charity, I am proud to announce tonight that you will be receiving our country’s highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.”

RELATED: ‘The View’ Complains Medal of Freedom Is for People Who ‘Did Stuff’ – Remember Who Obama Gave It To?

This one no doubt angered scores of liberals. And good. Rush Limbaugh wouldn’t have had it any other way.

This one meant a lot to me. As a young person in a half-liberal family where You Didn’t Say Such Things, Rush Limbaugh told me that yeah, you could say those things, and you could still be a decent person. You didn’t have to be a shock jock to say something shocking and true.

That’s where America was — and that was 30 years ago. One wishes Limbaugh would spend many years behind the golden EIB microphone with talent on loan from God and half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair. One fears, unfortunately, he won’t. If he doesn’t, this moment meant a lot to Limbaugh, and perhaps even more to people like me.

5) “My Administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the constitutional right to pray in public schools. In America, we do not punish prayer. We do not tear down crosses. We do not ban symbols of faith. We do not muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith. We cherish religion. We lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the glory of God.”

Videographers of conservative America, I give you the easiest commercial in the history of political ads. Look at the footage. Find your opponent. See if they stood up for this. They didn’t? Good work. You’ve earned a few steak dinners without any work.

6) “I’m also calling upon the members of Congress here tonight to pass legislation finally banning the late-term abortion of babies. Whether we are Republican, Democrat, or independent, surely we must all agree that every human life is a sacred gift from God.”

See response to moment number five above.

7) “Our message to the terrorists is clear: You will never escape American justice. If you attack our citizens, you forfeit your life.”

One thing I fear we’ll forget about Qasem Solemani: He was a terrorist. He wasn’t just a guy in an Iranian uniform that we called a terrorist. He was an actual, legitimate, honest-to-God terrorist. He funded client militias that set IEDs in Iraq that blew the legs off of our servicemembers. He helped fund an insurgency in Yemen that turned the country into a (yes) hellhole and then had them shoot a metric ton of rockets into Saudi Arabia.

When protesters in Iraq got tired of the Shiite client government there, he reminded that client government of what could be done: “We in Iran know how to deal with protesters,” Soleimani said during an October visit, according to The Atlantic. “This happened in Iran and we got it under control.”

Qassem Soleimani was turned into a pile of unthinking carbon molecules. More’s the pity. Anyone who picks up his mantle should and will meet his fate. Oh, this kind of actual justice annoys liberals? Thank u, next?

8) “We are Americans. We are the pioneers. We are the pathfinders. We settled the New World, we built the modern world, and we changed history forever by embracing the eternal truth that everyone is made equal by the hand of Almighty God. America is the place where anything can happen. America is the place where anyone can rise. And here, on this land, on this soil, on this continent, the most incredible dreams come true.”

If you disagreed with this statement, you also probably ripped up the speech.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Herman Cain: Don’t Let Dems Who Gave Us Iowa Chaos Go Anywhere Near Health Care, Electricity or Your Life

Op-Ed

Herman Cain: Don’t Let Dems Who Gave Us Iowa Chaos Go Anywhere Near Healthcare, Electricity or Your Life

Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during a campaign event on Feb. 2, 2020, in Dubuque, Iowa.Justin Sullivan / Getty ImagesDemocratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during a campaign event on Feb. 2, 2020, in Dubuque, Iowa. (Justin Sullivan / Getty Images)

Remember when the federal government launched Obama Care, or tried to? Among many other problems, the whole thing got messed up at the start because the website didn’t work.

The federal government has trillions of dollars to spend, but it couldn’t find a web developer that understood the challenges of having millions of people sign up online for health insurance. Or could it be that this is an idiotic way to have people get their health insurance, and the whole idea of managing it through a website was garbage to begin with?

I thought about that as we watched Monday night’s Democratic Iowa caucuses turn into an utter disaster. The app local leaders were supposed to use to report results didn’t work – apparently not having been properly tested – and when people tried to resort to calling a hotline, they ended up waiting on hold for an hour or more.

The common theme is this: Democrats constantly assail free markets and claim that if they were put in charge of running things, they would be smarter and fairer in how they did so. They claim they would go out and find the “best minds” to put in charge and would use the power of government to make sure everything is the way it’s supposed to be.

But here’s the problem: Democrats are better at obtaining power than they are at using it. The caucuses are a perfect example. These things have been held in Iowa for many decades, and there was never a problem reporting the results before Monday night. But someone got just a little too clever and thought they could show their brilliance by imposing a system that hadn’t been tested and couldn’t be shown to be better than the old way.

TRENDING: Super Bowl Halftime Show Contained a Subtle Anti-Trump Immigration Message

No matter. The best minds! Surely they knew what they were doing.

They didn’t, and the result was an embarrassing debacle from which the Democrats will not soon recover.

This is the problem when you centralize power and authority rather than leaving it in the hands of free-market actors and private individuals. In the free market, people make mistakes all the time. But the mistakes of some people are then addressed by others also participating in the free market, and eventually those who make too many mistakes lose opportunities to those who perform better. Sometimes people who make a lot of mistakes lose their role and have to accept a different one, but ultimately most people end up where they belong and the market keeps humming along as a result.

It doesn’t work that way when you centralize power in the form of a government monopoly. Whether it’s a website that doesn’t work, an app that isn’t tested correctly or an economic theory that doesn’t make sense, we all find ourselves having to live with the consequences of “best minds” who aren’t as smart as they want us to think they were.

Do you think the debacle at the Iowa caucuses was the result of government incompetence?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

Now some Democrats want to take over not only what’s left of the private health care market but also electrical production. In addition, they want to impose new regulations on everyone from banks to manufacturers to retailers about how to conduct business.

And yet when given the chance to perform themselves, they have far too often shown themselves to be without a clue.

As most of you know, I came up through the corporate ranks – spending time with corporations like Pillsbury, Burger King and Godfather’s Pizza. I also have served on the boards of organizations like Whirlpool and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

Everywhere I went, the same thing was true: Those who didn’t perform didn’t last long. Private companies can’t just print their own money, nor can they borrow endlessly without having to pay back the debts – like the federal government does. So private companies have to produce results. They’re in trouble if they don’t.

Putting the federal government in charge of anything more than it’s already in charge of means one more segment of the economy that’s run by people who are accountable to politics rather than to performance. The people who couldn’t launch a website correctly to run health care, and couldn’t deploy an app correctly to run simple caucuses, can’t run your life or the nation’s industries any better than we can run them ourselves. They are usually the least talented and least qualified, but most impressed by their own perceived intelligence.

RELATED: Fred Weinberg: Bloomberg Is Anti-Gun Because He Just Doesn’t Trust the Average American Citizen

There’s a reason the government that governs least governs best. Government doesn’t really attract the best and brightest people because the rewards for being that bright are found in the private sector. Government attracts the kind of people who dropped the ball on Monday night in Iowa.

This is one of the reasons Donald Trump has gotten good results as president. He came from the sector that demands results and always has, and he understood the pressure that was on him to perform. But even more important, he knew what strong performance looked like and he knew how to achieve it.

I don’t think the crowd who fumbled the Iowa caucuses can say the same, so maybe we shouldn’t be given them any more responsibility than they already have.

The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

WALSH: Trump Called For A Ban On Late-Term Abortion. Here’s Why The Arguments Against A Ban Are Absurd And Dishonest.

During his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, President Trump called for a ban on late-term abortions. This plea was made all the more vivid and powerful by the presence of a two-year-old girl in the audience who was born at 22 weeks gestation. Medical advances have made pregnancies “viable” well before the third trimester, and there’s no reason to think this trend toward earlier and earlier viability won’t continue.

Of course, the argument for banning late-term abortion is morally unassailable. There is no “clump of cells” dodge available to defender of this practice. Babies in the second trimester are at least the size of an adult’s hand — we’re not talking about a microscopic embryo, as pro-aborts would like us to imagine — and have all of their limbs and other recognizable human features. Midway through the second trimester and thereafter they can be safely delivered.

Abortions at this stage are necessarily brutal. The cervix is pried open; the amniotic fluid around the child is sucked out, and the victim is ripped apart limb-by-limp with a sopher clamp. Third-trimester abortions are even more barbaric. A poison needle is stabbed through the mother’s abdomen and into baby’s skull. Humans at this stage of development have a fully functioning nervous system, so the execution will be agonizingly painful for the child. There is no effort made whatsoever to limit the suffering. Such efforts would acknowledge the humanity or at least the life of the child, which is something the abortion industry cannot do. The mother will be forced to carry her dead baby around in her womb for two days before delivering the corpse. In some cases, the baby survives the initial injection and has to be given another one. It is no exaggeration to say that we treat rats and cockroaches with more dignity than this. And this is what President Trump wants to ban. Hardly an extreme position.

But the abortion industry’s minions in the media cannot accept any restrictions on abortion at all. And lacking any ethically sound argument in favor of literally tearing viable children apart, they resort to lies so shameless they’d be funny if not for the subject matter. In response to Trump’s comments last night, a number of abortion advocates took to social media to spread the absolutely bizarre claim that “there is no such thing” as late-term abortion and late-term abortion  “isn’t a thing.” It wouldn’t be any crazier or more delusional for me to rebut Elizabeth Warren’s “billionaires are evil” schtick by claiming billionaires don’t exist.

On the contrary, late-term abortions are most certainly a thing. Even estimates in liberal publication tell us that this “very rare” (read: existent) procedure accounts for “only” 1.3 percent of abortions. But 1.3 percent amounts to over 5,000 babies torn to pieces or stabbed in the head. If this is a small number, it is only small in comparison to the gargantuan body count the abortion industry racks up every year. Besides, rape and incest also account for only 1 percent of abortions, yet pro-aborts try to bring every abortion discussion back to this minority. You can’t have it both ways. Either the 1 percent cases are relevant or not.

The other lie — only slightly less egregious — is that these abortions are only carried out to save the mother’s life. Yet even former abortionists and current OB/GYNs will tell you that the life-saving abortion, to borrow a phrase, isn’t a thing. It is never necessary to kill a viable baby in order to save his mother. How could it be? If there is a potentially fatal complication with the pregnancy, the child can simply be delivered. Indeed, he will have to be delivered either way. The only question is whether you will take the extra step of executing him first. Obviously this step can have no medical value for the mother.

In reality, late-term abortions can happen simply because the mother decides she doesn’t want the child. Teen Vogue ran a piece in defense of the practice and the first example they gave was a woman who had an abortion in the second trimester because she “wasn’t ready” and didn’t have “financial stability.” Defend the dismemberment of a child for financial reasons if you want, but you can’t claim it’s medically necessary. Other late-term abortions might occur if the child suffers from a serious ailment or disability. But killing a person because he’s disabled or supposedly going to die anyway is not medically necessary either. If it is, then we have ventured fully into eugenics territory and the implications extend far beyond the womb.

No matter how you look at the picture, the talking points offered by the pro-abortion side are ridiculously false. President Trump is right to call for a ban on this barbarity. And all decent people in the country agree with him.

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Did China’s Tencent Accidentally Leak The True Terrifying Coronavirus Statistics

Did China’s Tencent Accidentally Leak The True Terrifying Coronavirus Statistics

Ten days ago, shortly after China first started reporting the cases and deaths associated with the coronavirus epidemic, a UK researcher predicted that over 250,000 Chinese would be infected with the virus by February 4. And while according to official Chinese data, the number of infections has indeed soared in the past two weeks, at just under 25,000 (and roughly 500 deaths), it is a far cry from this dismal prediction, about ten times below that predicted by the epidemiologists.

Is this discrepancy possible? Is the epidemic truly far less serious than conventional epidemiological models predicted? Or is China merely hiding the full extent of the problem?

After all, it the WSJ itself reported in late January , China was explicitly manipulating the casualty number by listing pneumonia as the cause of death instead of coronavirus. Subsequent reports that Wuhan officials were rushing to cremate coronavirus casualties before they could be counted did not add to the credibility of the official data.

But the biggest hit to the narrative and China’s officially reported epidemic numbers came overnight, when a slip up in China’s TenCent may have revealed the true extent of the coronavirus epidemic on the mainland. And it is nothing short than terrifying.

As the Taiwan Times reports, over the weekend, "Tencent seems to have inadvertently released what is potentially the actual number of infections and deaths, which were astronomically higher than official figures", and were far closer to the catastrophic epidemic projections made by Jonathan Read.

According to the report, late on Saturday evening, Tencent, on its webpage titled "Epidemic Situation Tracker", showed confirmed cases of novel coronavirus (2019nCoV) in China as standing at 154,023, 10 times the official figure at the time. It listed the number of suspected cases as 79,808, four times the official figure.

And while the number of cured cases was only 269, well below the official number that day of 300, most ominously, the death toll listed was 24,589, vastly higher than the 300 officially listed that day.

Tencent screengrab as of late Feb 1, showing far higher infections.

Moments later, Tencent updated the numbers to reflect the government’s "official" numbers that day.

Screengrab showing higher numbers (left), chart showing "official" numbers (right). (Internet image)

This was not the first time Tencent has done this: as Taiwan Times notes, Chinese netizens have noticed that Tencent has on at least three occasions posted extremely high numbers, only to quickly lower them to government-approved statistics.

This is where it gets even more bizarre: contrary to claiming that this was just a "fat finger" mistyping of data, observant Chinese netizens also noticed that each time the screen with the large numbers appears, it shows a comparison with the previous day’s data which demonstrates a "reasonable" incremental increase, much like comparisons of official numbers.

This led many in the mainland to speculate that Tencent has two sets of data, the real data and "processed" data.

In short, two camps have emerged: one, the more optimistic, speculates that a coding problem could be causing the real "internal" data to accidentally appear. The other, far more pessimistically inclined, believes that someone behind the scenes is trying to leak the real numbers, as "the "internal" data held by Beijing may not reflect the true extent of the epidemic."

Indeed, as repeatedly pointed out here and according to multiple sources in Wuhan, many coronavirus patients are unable to receive treatment and die outside of hospitals. Furthermore, a severe shortage of test kits also leads to a lower number of diagnosed cases of infection and death. In addition, there have been many reports of doctors being ordered to list other forms of death instead of coronavirus to keep the death toll artificially low.

What is the truth?

We leave it up to readers, but keep this in mind: on Jan 29, Zeng Guang, the chief scientist of epidemiology at China’s CDC, made a rare candid admission about why Chinese officials cannot tell people the truth in an interview with the state-run tabloid Global Times: "The officials need to think about the political angle and social stability in order to keep their positions."

And then, on Monday, none other than China Xi’s called on all officials to quickly work together to contain the Coronavirus at a rare meeting of top leaders, saying the outcome would "directly impact social stability in the country."

Well, if China is mostly concerned about social stability – as it should be for a nation of 1.4 billion – it is easy to comprehend why the entire political apparatus in China would be geared to presenting numbers which seem somewhat credible – in light of the barrage of videos of people dying on the street – but not so terrifying as to cause a countrywide panic.

Then again, if China indeed had over 154,000 cases and almost 25,000 deaths as of 5 days ago, then no attempts to mask the full extent and true severity of the pandemic have any hope of "containing" the truth.


Tyler Durden

Wed, 02/05/2020 – 08:40

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

SOTU: The unspeakable ungraciousness of the Democrats in Congress

President Trump’s SOTU speech Tuesday night was spectacular on every level. It was unabashedly pro-American, pro-law-enforcement, pro-border security, pro-religious freedom, pro-life, pro-school choice and pro-the American job and economic comeback, and then some; there was so much more, all of it positive, optimistic.  This president has indeed begun to make America great again. 

Despite the Democrats’ fervent attempts to see him removed from office, President Trump has succeeded beyond all expectations for the good of the nation.  This is what so enrages the left; the man has done in three years what they have promised their voters for sixty-plus years but never accomplished — on purpose.  The left has always promised what they never intended to deliver. Their plan for decades has been to keep us all down, begging them, the federal government, for sustenance.  Their plan has always been to convince us we cannot thrive without their intervention in our lives and by intervention, they mean they will tell us how to live, breathe, eat, drive, work, etc.  Our left is authoritarian, fascist.  

And they are also as ungracious as any group of people who have ever held office in America. 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yet again embarrassed herself.  This is a woman without an iota of grace or class.  She has been determined to see President Trump unseated since the day he won the election.  She is the wicked witch of the House; all-powerful but losing her grip on her caucus and her sanity; she is melting.  She sat grim-faced, working her mouth in odd ways as always, trying to distract from the content of the speech by shuffling papers to make the point that she was not listening.  She was purposefully rude. Her behavior should be mortifying to her colleagues but they all behaved in like manner.

As the president listed the many successes of his administration so far, the Democrats sat on their hands, refusing to applaud nearly all of the terrific things that have taken place these past three years.  They made a point of appearing dismissive of the man and his words.  They are very angry that it has been a non-ideological Republican who has achieved so much for so many, doing things Democrats have always promised but never fulfilled, stealing their thunder.  

Trump’s economic policies have brought all demographic groups more jobs and higher wages.  No wonder his approval among African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, women, and youth has grown.  They are all better off since he was elected.  He has elicited more money for NATO, passed USMCA and begun to even up trade with China, his initial reason for running for the office of president.

The most egregiously infuriating aspect of the night was the persistent despicable behavior of the Democrats who were in the room.  They acted like small children, infantilized by their hatred of this president and their belief that Americans must be taken care of according to their specifications.  They demeaned themselves with their pathetic behavior at an event like this SOTU speech by refusing to acknowledge any of this president’s  victories.  A few of the usual suspects  walked out during the speech, a feeble attempt to demonstrate their contempt.  They are obviously both angry and embarrassed that their misguided attempt to impeach the president failed.  But they should take their rage out on Reps. Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and Pelosi who truly failed them, not the president.  All those Democrats who sat by and watched the Schiff show systematically destroy their own party are to blame for their own demise.   

Trump will be re-elected in a landslide, with black, Hispanic, gay, and former Democrats in support.  He actually is making America great again.  And for that, the Democrats sat stone-faced, furious, throughout the speech.  They made one thing manifestly clear:  They are anti-American, anti-self-reliance, pro-crime, pro-illegal immigration, pro-sanctuary cites for illegal criminals, anti-Second Amendment and anti-American people.

Americans have just endured three years of the Democrats’ inability to accept the results of the 2016 election and the torment of the costly and phony Russia hoax as well as the Mueller investigation, which was in fact a cover-up scheme.  Then Schiff brought us the long-planned Ukraine nonsense.  We have all watched Schiff’s descent into madness; he is in need of a rubber room with his final ravings, and yet his colleagues still refrain from stopping him from making an ever bigger fool of himself.  They have remained silent as he has made their party a laughingstock.  Not a single Democrat has had the courage to shout that this wanna-be emperor has no clothes.   Schiff’s obsession with removing Trump from office is clearly a sign of his mental instability.  Trump is going to sell Alaska to Russia!  Bring on the straitjacket and an incapacitating agent.

When the president’s speech was over, Pelosi furiously ripped up her copy of it on camera.  

Is there a better, more telling act of her anger and disrespect for the office of the presidency?  She is a harridan, a blight upon her city, her party and the country.  The American Democrat party has become something it was never meant to be: it has morphed into a radically fascist party of autocrats.  Certainly not all of them fall into this category but those who do not are cowards.  Clearly they are afraid of the tyrants who control the party so they sit quietly by in fear of losing their seats.   As we watched them all refuse to applaud the many successes of this administration and the members of the audience Trump celebrated, we should all realize that these people are not on the side of America or Americans.  As Pelosi so ungraciously ripped up her copy of the speech on camera, she proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Democrat party is no longer pro-American, pro-freedom nor pro-democracy.  This SOTU speech was a transformative moment.  Now we know that only one party represents the American people.  The Democrat party as currently constituted, should ship out to Venezuela where they would feel right at home.  

Image credit: YouTube screen grab

President Trump’s SOTU speech Tuesday night was spectacular on every level. It was unabashedly pro-American, pro-law-enforcement, pro-border security, pro-religious freedom, pro-life, pro-school choice and pro-the American job and economic comeback, and then some; there was so much more, all of it positive, optimistic.  This president has indeed begun to make America great again. 

Despite the Democrats’ fervent attempts to see him removed from office, President Trump has succeeded beyond all expectations for the good of the nation.  This is what so enrages the left; the man has done in three years what they have promised their voters for sixty-plus years but never accomplished — on purpose.  The left has always promised what they never intended to deliver. Their plan for decades has been to keep us all down, begging them, the federal government, for sustenance.  Their plan has always been to convince us we cannot thrive without their intervention in our lives and by intervention, they mean they will tell us how to live, breathe, eat, drive, work, etc.  Our left is authoritarian, fascist.  

And they are also as ungracious as any group of people who have ever held office in America. 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yet again embarrassed herself.  This is a woman without an iota of grace or class.  She has been determined to see President Trump unseated since the day he won the election.  She is the wicked witch of the House; all-powerful but losing her grip on her caucus and her sanity; she is melting.  She sat grim-faced, working her mouth in odd ways as always, trying to distract from the content of the speech by shuffling papers to make the point that she was not listening.  She was purposefully rude. Her behavior should be mortifying to her colleagues but they all behaved in like manner.

As the president listed the many successes of his administration so far, the Democrats sat on their hands, refusing to applaud nearly all of the terrific things that have taken place these past three years.  They made a point of appearing dismissive of the man and his words.  They are very angry that it has been a non-ideological Republican who has achieved so much for so many, doing things Democrats have always promised but never fulfilled, stealing their thunder.  

Trump’s economic policies have brought all demographic groups more jobs and higher wages.  No wonder his approval among African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, women, and youth has grown.  They are all better off since he was elected.  He has elicited more money for NATO, passed USMCA and begun to even up trade with China, his initial reason for running for the office of president.

The most egregiously infuriating aspect of the night was the persistent despicable behavior of the Democrats who were in the room.  They acted like small children, infantilized by their hatred of this president and their belief that Americans must be taken care of according to their specifications.  They demeaned themselves with their pathetic behavior at an event like this SOTU speech by refusing to acknowledge any of this president’s  victories.  A few of the usual suspects  walked out during the speech, a feeble attempt to demonstrate their contempt.  They are obviously both angry and embarrassed that their misguided attempt to impeach the president failed.  But they should take their rage out on Reps. Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and Pelosi who truly failed them, not the president.  All those Democrats who sat by and watched the Schiff show systematically destroy their own party are to blame for their own demise.   

Trump will be re-elected in a landslide, with black, Hispanic, gay, and former Democrats in support.  He actually is making America great again.  And for that, the Democrats sat stone-faced, furious, throughout the speech.  They made one thing manifestly clear:  They are anti-American, anti-self-reliance, pro-crime, pro-illegal immigration, pro-sanctuary cites for illegal criminals, anti-Second Amendment and anti-American people.

Americans have just endured three years of the Democrats’ inability to accept the results of the 2016 election and the torment of the costly and phony Russia hoax as well as the Mueller investigation, which was in fact a cover-up scheme.  Then Schiff brought us the long-planned Ukraine nonsense.  We have all watched Schiff’s descent into madness; he is in need of a rubber room with his final ravings, and yet his colleagues still refrain from stopping him from making an ever bigger fool of himself.  They have remained silent as he has made their party a laughingstock.  Not a single Democrat has had the courage to shout that this wanna-be emperor has no clothes.   Schiff’s obsession with removing Trump from office is clearly a sign of his mental instability.  Trump is going to sell Alaska to Russia!  Bring on the straitjacket and an incapacitating agent.

When the president’s speech was over, Pelosi furiously ripped up her copy of it on camera.  

Is there a better, more telling act of her anger and disrespect for the office of the presidency?  She is a harridan, a blight upon her city, her party and the country.  The American Democrat party has become something it was never meant to be: it has morphed into a radically fascist party of autocrats.  Certainly not all of them fall into this category but those who do not are cowards.  Clearly they are afraid of the tyrants who control the party so they sit quietly by in fear of losing their seats.   As we watched them all refuse to applaud the many successes of this administration and the members of the audience Trump celebrated, we should all realize that these people are not on the side of America or Americans.  As Pelosi so ungraciously ripped up her copy of the speech on camera, she proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Democrat party is no longer pro-American, pro-freedom nor pro-democracy.  This SOTU speech was a transformative moment.  Now we know that only one party represents the American people.  The Democrat party as currently constituted, should ship out to Venezuela where they would feel right at home.  

Image credit: YouTube screen grab

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/