Report: Biden campaign is in direct contact with Palestinian Authority, which financially supports terrorists

Former Vice President Joe Biden’s Democratic presidential campaign is directly communicating with the Palestinian Authority, reports say.

Two anonymous sources who spoke with The Media Line claimed that a Palestinian-American businessman helped the Biden campaign establish contact with Palestinian leadership, which supports terrorists and their families with government funds.

"Having dialogue with the Democratic candidate is important to the leadership," one of the officials said, The Media Line reported. "We want to let Mr. Biden know that we are willing and ready to talk."

The Palestinian government has vigorously opposed President Donald Trump’s pro-Israel policies, halting all contact with the administration since 2017 after the president recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moved the U.S. Embassy there. Trump has ended millions of dollars of American aid to the Palestinians, shut down Palestinian diplomatic offices in Washington D.C., and pursued deals with Arab states to normalize their relations with Israel over Palestinian objections.

According to The Media Line’s sources, the Palestinians believe a Biden administration will be far more favorable to their interests.

"We are sure that if he wins, he will reassert the US position on the two-state solution and order the PLO office in Washington reopened," the other PA official said.

Jihad Harb, a political analyst for several Palestinian media outlets, said the Palestinians are watching the U.S. election closely.

"The Palestinians have reestablished relations with an important segment of the congressional leadership in the past few years," he told The Media line. "The Democratic Party has a majority in the House of Representatives, and there are certainly channels of communication."

"They [Palestinian leaders] definitely want Trump to leave," he explained. "He imposed a set of cruel, unfair and anti-Palestinian measures, and therefore they prefer Biden, at least because of their experience with him during his years as vice president in the Obama administration."

"The Palestinians usually prefer the Democrats, and the Palestinian leadership prefers that the president be from the Democratic Party," he added.

Recently, the Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh publicly opposed Trump’s re-election in a Facebook post decrying the current U.S. administration.

"If we are going to live another four years with President Trump, God help us… and the whole world," Shtayyeh said, according to the Times of Israel.

"Four years have been really wasted," Shtayyeh continued. "We were waiting for the ultimate deal and everyone was hoping that the ultimate deal would really be a deal and be ultimate. Unfortunately it has not been."

Shtayyeh expressed hope that Biden would oust Trump from office.

"If things are going to change in the United States I think this will reflect itself directly on the Palestinian-Israeli relationship," he said. "And it will reflect itself also on the bilateral Palestinian-American relationship."

The Palestinian government financially supports terrorism through the Palestinian Liberation Organization and has continued to do so despite fiscal constraints, the Washington Free Beacon reported Friday.

From the Free Beacon:

Known as a policy of "pay to slay," the Palestinian government uses money from international donors and other aid groups to financially support imprisoned terrorists and their families. The practice has long attracted international scorn and played a significant role in the Trump administration’s 2018 decision to cut nearly $200 million in U.S. funding to the Palestinian government. While the move was meant to pressure Palestinian leaders into ending the payments, the PLO has continued the practice under the radar, according to a recent report submitted by the State Department to Congress.

"Despite fiscal constraints … the [Palestinian Authority] continued to make payments through the PLO to Palestinians connected to terrorism," according to the report. "This is despite Israel’s decision to suspend extension of sovereignty into the West Bank. The recipients of the payments included Palestinian terrorists in Israeli prison, released Palestinian terrorists, and the families of Palestinians who were wounded or died while committing terrorist acts or in connection with terrorism."

The continuation of these payments is likely to frustrate lawmakers and U.S. diplomats who have been working to make the Palestinian government solvent and more likely to engage in peace talks with Israel. While the State Department did not say how much the Palestinian government spends on terrorists, outside groups put the number at upwards of $300 million a year. The pay-to-slay program has been a major roadblock with Israel, which moved in February to fine any banks that facilitate these payments. Palestinian leaders, however, have vowed to continue supporting terrorists.

The Biden campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Blaze.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

Election Day “Shocker”: Mueller Went After WikiLeaks & Roger Stone For DNC Hacks But Found ‘Lack Of Evidence’

Election Day "Shocker": Mueller Went After WikiLeaks & Roger Stone For DNC Hacks But Found ‘Lack Of Evidence’

Tyler Durden

Tue, 11/03/2020 – 17:05

Much belatedly and amazingly a mere hours before election day Buzzfeed News published a bombshell report late Monday night based on the DOJ newly declassifying previously secret portions of the Mueller report (following a successful FOIA lawsuit to obtain them). It’s yet more smoking gun evidence proving long after the fact that core aspects of now deflated ‘Russiagate’ that American media spent years devoting wall-to-wall coverage to were deliberate manufactured falsehoods (shocker!), specifically as regards claims of early collaboration and "collusion" between Trump staffers, WikiLeaks, and the Russian government.

Unfortunately, like with the latest news that put the final nail in the coffin of the Steele dossier hoax, this too will fast be memory-holed given it’s now election day. We learn 18-months after the initial report’s redacted release that despite putting one of the most hyped central allegations facing Trump’s team and his past campaign adviser Roger Stone under a microscope, Mueller’s team of hundreds of FBI agents simply "did not have sufficient evidence" and thus never pursued charges, as the Buzzfeed report begins:

Prosecutors investigated Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, and Roger Stone for the hacking of Democratic National Committee servers as well as for possible campaign finance violations, but ultimately chose not to charge them, newly released portions of the Mueller Report reveal.

Although WikiLeaks published emails stolen from the DNC in July and October 2016 and Stone — a close associate to Donald Trump — appeared to know in advance the materials were coming, investigators "did not have sufficient evidence" to prove active participation in the hacks or knowledge that the electronic thefts were continuing. In addition, federal prosecutors could not establish that the hacked emails amounted to campaign contributions benefitting Trump’s election chances and furthermore felt their publication might have been protected by the First Amendment, making a successful prosecution tenuous.

Getty Images

Recall that throughout years it was an unquestioned article of faith communicated to the American public over the airwaves of MSNBC, CNN, CBS, and others that WikiLeaks essentially ran cover for Russia in a grand DNC email hack conspiracy designed to influence the 2016 presidential election while embarrassing Hillary. We were "assured" that this played a crucial role in Trump’s victory over Clinton.

The widespread unfounded allegations also served to permanently taint WikiLeaks as some kind of Moscow influence op, which also no doubt added pressure to UK attempts to apprehend Julian Assange from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, which ended up happening.

The relevant newly unredacted section details that investigators "considered whether to charge WikiLeaks, Assange, or Stone as conspirators in the computer-intrusion conspiracy," given WikiLeaks’ "role in disseminating the hacked materials, and the existence of some evidence that Stone played a role in coordinating" the publication of Clinton adviser John Podesta’s emails:

"While the Office cannot exclude the possibility of coordination between Stone and WikiLeaks or that additional evidence could come to light on that issue, the investigation did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove facts establishing such coordination beyond a reasonable doubt," the newly released portion said.

Buzzfeed presents one illuminating passage as follows:

"While the investigation developed evidence that the GRU’s hacking efforts in fact were continuing at least at the time of the July 2016 WikiLeaks dissemination," a newly unredacted section of the report reads, prosecutors "did not develop sufficient admissible evidence that WikiLeaks knew of — or even was willfully blind to — that fact."

For comparison of how the same page looked before Monday:

Phrases that are deeply inconvenient to longtime Russiagate peddlers appear in the newly released sections, such as "factual…hurdles" and "proof..lacking". Speaking of these legal hurdles the report said bluntly:

Regardless, success [of criminal charges] would also depend upon evidence of WikiLeaks’s and Stone’s knowledge of ongoing or contemplated future computer intrusions – the proof that is currently lacking.

And Buzzfeed continues:

Likewise, prosecutors faced what they called factual hurdles in pursuing Stone for the hack. The report notes they lacked proof "beyond a reasonable doubt that Stone knew or believed that the computer intrusions were ongoing at the time he ostensibly encouraged or coordinated the publication of the Podesta emails."

Mueller wrote that the Justice Department "did not have admissible evidence," for conspiracy convictions to stick. This definitive confirmation comes a whopping 18-months after the original redacted report’s release.

The DOJ tried to argue it could "compromise ongoing investigations" or possibly reveal sensitive law enforcement tactics or procedures in keeping the new information classified.

Or perhaps given they understood it would inevitably be released one day, why not release when it’s too late for the information to make a major impact? That is… now that the election is already upon us and with Americans having voted or made up their minds. But as a reminder, this is precisely how propaganda is supposed to work after all.

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml

NYPD Union Endorses Trump, Cites His ‘Undisputed Record of Supporting Police’

A New York Police Department union officially endorsed President Donald Trump for re-election on Tuesday. President Ed Mullins of the NYPD Sergeants Benevolent Association encouraged citizens, on behalf of his organization, to “vote for President Trump.” This marks yet another law enforcement organization backing the president’s re-election campaign following months of major leaders in the…

The post NYPD Union Endorses Trump, Cites His ‘Undisputed Record of Supporting Police’ appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Prolific Christian Author Gives 20 Powerful Reasons To Support Trump

New York Times bestselling author Joel C. Rosenberg, a onetime NeverTrumper who decided just days before the 2016 election to vote for the Republican candidate, is now fully aboard the Trump train. And he’s offering 20 reasons why other people should support Trump too. Rosenberg, a dual citizen of the United States and Israel, recounted…

The post Prolific Christian Author Gives 20 Powerful Reasons To Support Trump appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Multiple Dead People Caught Voting, Election Records Reportedly Show

The dead voter phenomenon is already rearing its ugly, ugly head in the 2020 presidential election. According to a Monday report from the New York Post, at least two ballots have been mailed to the New York City Board of Elections by citizens deceased before their vote was cast. Records apparently reviewed by the outlet…

The post Multiple Dead People Caught Voting, Election Records Reportedly Show appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Here Are The Celebrities Who Have Vowed To Leave U.S. Should Trump Win

Every four years, limousine liberals vow that they’ll leave the U.S. if the Republican presidential candidate wins. Of course, they never do, but they vow to, anyway. Here are the celebrities who have said they’ll abandon America if President Trump wins re-election. Bruce Springsteen The Boss said he’d quit the U.S. and just might move […]

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

Antifa gearing up for false flag violence disguised as Trump-supporters


With merchants in Democrat-run cities boarding up their storefront windows, the possibility of serious urban violence is well-understood.  As horrific as that could get (ask anyone who lives in Minneapolis), the progressive fascists appear to have a plan in place to make it even worse: disguising their rioters as Trump supporters in order to make the case that Donald Trump truly is a dictator that must be violently overthrown if he wins, or arrested and prosecuted if he loses.

A source that has always been reliable was able to photograph an Antifa flyer:

What makes all of this particularly chilling is that progressives already are absurdly claiming that the threat of violence comes from our side. Portland’s Mayor Ted Wheeler warns of white racist rioters inspired by the rhetoric from Washington, DC (i.e., Trump):

 

 

Other media players, such Vox and New York Times warn of both sides, a disguise of balance, but ridiculously unrealistic, considering the utter lack of property destruction by the right, and massive destruction at the hands of the left since Gorge Floyd’s death in police custody.

Tucker Carlson and Lisa Boothe last night addressed Ted Wheeler’s warning, and correctly pointed out its absurdity.  As they noted, if merchants believed that white supremacists were the threat, they would not be spray painting “We support Black Lives Matter” on their plywood window coverings. If they thought Ted Wheeler were for real, not a vicious lair, they would spray white power rhetoric. The segment begins at about 1:30 in the video below (courtesy of Media Matters!)

Speaking of Tucker C., his opening monologue last night nailed it, explaining what this election is all about. Do yourself a favor and devote 5 minutes to watching if you missed it. It demonstrates why Tucker is now the most important figure in television today.

With merchants in Democrat-run cities boarding up their storefront windows, the possibility of serious urban violence is well-understood.  As horrific as that could get (ask anyone who lives in Minneapolis), the progressive fascists appear to have a plan in place to make it even worse: disguising their rioters as Trump supporters in order to make the case that Donald Trump truly is a dictator that must be violently overthrown if he wins, or arrested and prosecuted if he loses.

A source that has always been reliable was able to photograph an Antifa flyer:

What makes all of this particularly chilling is that progressives already are absurdly claiming that the threat of violence comes from our side. Portland’s Mayor Ted Wheeler warns of white racist rioters inspired by the rhetoric from Washington, DC (i.e., Trump):

 

 

Other media players, such Vox and New York Times warn of both sides, a disguise of balance, but ridiculously unrealistic, considering the utter lack of property destruction by the right, and massive destruction at the hands of the left since Gorge Floyd’s death in police custody.

Tucker Carlson and Lisa Boothe last night addressed Ted Wheeler’s warning, and correctly pointed out its absurdity.  As they noted, if merchants believed that white supremacists were the threat, they would not be spray painting “We support Black Lives Matter” on their plywood window coverings. If they thought Ted Wheeler were for real, not a vicious lair, they would spray white power rhetoric. The segment begins at about 1:30 in the video below (courtesy of Media Matters!)

Speaking of Tucker C., his opening monologue last night nailed it, explaining what this election is all about. Do yourself a favor and devote 5 minutes to watching if you missed it. It demonstrates why Tucker is now the most important figure in television today.

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

Not The Onion: Most Common Female Name For A Biden Voter Is “Karen”

Not The Onion: Most Common Female Name For A Biden Voter Is "Karen"

Tyler Durden

Mon, 11/02/2020 – 15:30

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A study by the New York Times and Siena College has revealed that the most common female name for someone voting for Joe Biden is ‘Karen’.

The figures show that Karens are more likely to vote for Biden over Trump by a 60/40 margin.

The most common female name for a Trump voter is ‘Nancy’, while the most common male name is ‘Richard’.

The ‘Karen’ meme – which came to prominence earlier this year, describes an overly interfering, obnoxious, self-entitled female who always tries to police other people’s behavior and ‘complain to the manager’.

The left tried to hijack the meme by asserting that its common stereotype was a white woman, almost always a Trump supporter, who unfairly called the police on black people because she is racist.

Its other main trope was a mentally deficient but loudly boisterous white woman who got into arguments with store employees and other customers by refusing to wear a face mask.

However, as the video below highlights, anecdotal evidence suggests ‘Karens’ are just as likely to be vehement leftist control freaks who are righteously indignant in lecturing others about not wearing masks or maintaining ‘social distancing’.

While ‘Karen’ is just a meme used to describe the behavior of people who may not actually be called Karen, the fact that a clear majority of Karens are voting for Biden goes some way to overturning the meme being used as a pejorative to ridicule people on the right and Trump supporters.

*  *  *

New limited edition merch now available! Click here.

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Also, I urgently need your financial support here.

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.zerohedge.com/fullrss2.xml