Top 10 Worst Cases of Big Tech Censorship in 2020

Online platforms got to use their favorite tool in 2020 before and even after the election: censorship.
During one of several Senate hearings into Big Tech bias this year, even the CEOs of Facebook and Twitter could not name a single high-profile leftist person or entity that had been censored on their platforms when asked. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) admonished Big Tech executives in a different hearing, saying specifically to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg: “You have used this power to run amok. You have used it to silence conservatives.”
Heavily censored themes included anything related to the election, COVID-19 and the response to it and statements released by President Donald Trump. However, Big Tech even found reasons to censor conservatives over things as innocuous as a children’s book celebrating women’s suffrage. 
Given the rampant censorship that was perpetrated in 2020, coming up with the top ten was a daunting task. Here is the 2020 Top Ten list of the worst cases of Big Tech censorship. 
Big Tech shuts down New York Post’s bombshell reporting on Hunter Biden:
The shuttering of the New York Post’s (the Post) bombshell reporting on Hunter Biden stands apart from all other examples of censorship on this list. The worst censorship this year was the insidious attempt to silence the Post’s reporting on a scandal involving former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter. The report allegedly showed evidence of Hunter introducing his father to a Ukrainian executive who was working as an advisor to Burisma. After the election, it was revealed that there has been an ongoing federal investigation into Hunter’s taxes that involved the allegations reported by the Post. However, Big Tech went to great lengths to suppress the story when it broke.
Twitter disabled the link to the story, calling it potentially unsafe, and then it censored the Post, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany, the Trump Campaign and even the House Judiciary Committee for sharing it. Twitter also locked the Post out of its account unless it agreed to delete the tweet, which it refused to do. Twitter later unblocked the story, and it finally unlocked the Post’s account after 17 days.
Facebook joined the suppression of the Post. The outlet relied on its stable of liberal fact-checkers to discredit the report, and limited the reach of the article even before the fact-check was complete.
The result of the censorship by Big Tech, combined with widespread suppression of the story by the liberal media, was stunning. A Media Research Center survey conducted by The Polling Company showed that 4.6% of Biden voters would have changed their vote had they known about the scandal. The MRC poll showed that Trump would have won six key battleground states, giving him 311 electoral votes, thus flipping the election to Trump.
Twitter censors Trump tweet about mail-in voting in unprecedented manner:
Twitter took censorship of Trump to new heights in 2020. Certainly, censorship of the president is not new, with analysis showing that Twitter has censored him at least 625 times since May 31, 2018, while Biden has not been censored once in that time.
A tweet on Oct. 26 criticizing mail-in voting set a new precedent, though. The tweet read: “Big problems and discrepancies with Mail In Ballots all over the USA. Must have final total on November 3rd.” Twitter placed an interstitial filter over the tweet, indicating that “Some or all of the content shared in this Tweet is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process. Learn more[.]” This filter must be clicked through just to read the tweet.
If a user clicks to read the tweet, that warning message remains above the text of the tweet, along with a label under it that reads: “Learn how voting by mail is safe and secure.” The label under Trump’s tweet links to a Twitter information page titled “Voting by mail is legal and safe, experts and data confirm.” The information page contains unattributed summaries of key points about voting by mail. It also contains tweets from various liberal media outlets reaffirming the same.
Twitter did not stop there. Should a user wish to like this tweet, they are not allowed to do so. Likes have been turned off for the tweet. Comments and sharing have also been turned off for the tweet. 
Finally, if a user clicks to retweet the tweet, they will first be presented with yet another warning. The warning on the tweet states: “Learn how voting by mail is safe and secure. Help keep Twitter a place for reliable info. Find out more before sharing.” The warning then links to the same mail-in voting information page provided on the previously noted warning beneath the tweet. At the bottom of this warning pop-up there is a small link to “Quote Tweet” the tweet. However, while a user is often able to use the “Quote Tweet” function to retweet something by just not adding a comment, in this case the tweet button is not activated until a comment is added. The Trump tweet would still contain the interstitial in the “Quote Tweet” as well.
Candace Owens’s Facebook page is “demonetized” and “suppressed”:
Conservative commentator and BLEXIT founder Candace Owens has been censored by Big Tech so many times that she is suing Facebook fact-checkers over it. She explained that she has had multiple fact-checks overturned, but that each time she must get a lawyer involved before she can get a resolution.
Owens’s Facebook page was reportedly “demonetized” over a fact-check of a post she made about Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) in August. In the post, she expressed her excitement about seeing Harris play the “black woman” card as a nominee for Vice President after being sworn into the Senate as an Indian-American woman. Facebook’s fact-checkers ruled this post as “false information,” and allegedly suppressed her page over it. 
YouTube removes COVID video featuring Trump advisor Dr. Scott Atlas:
Big Tech appointed itself the arbiters of what constitutes accurate information on COVID-19 as the virus gained pandemic status. While there has been rampant censorship of any views that did not align with Big Tech’s stance on the virus, one incident stood out from the rest. 
White House presidential advisor, Dr. Scott Atlas, MD, was featured in a video produced by Stanford University’s Hoover Institute about “The Efficacy Of Lockdowns, Social Distancing, And Closings.” YouTube claimed that the video contradicted “the World Health Organization [WHO] or local health authorities’ medical information about COVID-19,” and removed it. 
Facebook demonetizes The Babylon Bee page over Monty Python joke:
Big Tech does not seem to enjoy the satirical musings of The Babylon Bee and has fact-checked and censored it before. However, Facebook not only deleted a Babylon Bee article, but also demonetized its page over an article that the platform claimed incited violence. 
The deleted article was actually a riff on a Monty Python joke, from the “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” movie. The story, regarding the Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, was titled: “Senator Hirono Demands ACB Be Weighed Against A Duck To See If She Is A Witch.” Upon review, The Babylon Bee said Facebook stood by its determination, and even advised The Babylon Bee not to speak about the incident publicly.
Twitter removes all instances of Joe Biden meme:
Twitter declared all-out war on a Joe Biden meme, insisting that it was “misleading information about voting.” The meme was styled to look like a Biden campaign ad, and included a photo of him with a bright light shining out of his chest. The meme said, “His Brain? No, His Heart.” 
Twitter used Artificial Intelligence tools to find instances of anyone tweeting the meme, and instantly locked users’ accounts until they removed the offending meme. The users typically then were forced to serve a 12-hour suspension, though some were out longer. Post Millennial editor Anna Slatz and conservative activist Mindy Robinson were two of the Twitter users censored for sharing this meme.
Instagram removes FBI Crime statistics, calling them “hate speech”:
Instagram users who shared FBI crime statistics in an effort to critique the Black Lives Matter narrative found themselves accused of “hate speech.” Instagram removed posts that cited actual FBI crime statistics that showed black on white violence and murders are more prevalent than white on black. BlazeTV host and producer Elijah Schaffer even noted that, according to the crime statistics, “cops kill as many unarmed whites as unarmed blacks.” Eventually Instagram reversed its decision and reinstated the deleted posts.
YouTube removes video featuring man who reversed his transgender surgery:
Walt Heyer said he regretted his decision to surgically alter his body so he could live as a woman and had the surgery reversed. In a video posted to YouTube, he detailed his story and his position that children should not be pushed into such gender transitions. YouTube ultimately censored the video, citing its “hate speech policy,” and removed it. 
YouTube pointed to one claim made by Heyer in particular: that transgenderism is “a childhood developmental disorder.” The video was re-uploaded by The Heritage Foundation after it “bleeped” the statement as though it were a curse word. This resolution appears to have satisfied YouTube, as the modified video is still available.
YouTube suspends and demonetizes conservative news network One America News (OAN):
Up and coming conservative news network One America News (OAN) was suspended for a week by YouTube over a video that the network said was not even publicly available. YouTube claimed the network published a video that violated its COVID-19 rules, promoting a false cure, according to Axios. However, OAN’s Alex Salvi stated in a tweet that the video in question was “‘unlisted’ and not available publicly on YouTube.” In addition to the week-long suspension, OAN’s YouTube channel has also been demonetized. The network has since announced a move to conservative YouTube alternative Rumble.
Instagram bans ads for Senator Marsha Blackburn’s children’s book:
Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and her daughter wrote a children’s book to highlight Tennessee’s role being the final state to meet the minimum number to ratify the 19th Amendment, granting women the right to vote. Instagram refused to allow paid ads to promote this book three separate times, including on day of the book’s launch.
Instagram indicated after the first two instances that it had automatically banned the ads because they had the potential to “influence the outcome of an election, or existing proposed legislation.” Instagram ultimately reversed its decisions and allowed the ads. After the first instance, the platform requested that Blackburn’s daughter and co-author, Mary Morgan Ketchel, “register her personal account as a political group or influencer,” according to The Federalist. She refused.
 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump In Pennsylvania, Data Scientists Say

Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump In Pennsylvania, Data Scientists Say

Authored by Allen Zhong via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Pennsylvania election data shows that over 432,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump during the November election, data scientists say.

According to an analysis by the Data Integrity Group, obtained exclusively by The Epoch Times, votes for Trump – from both Election Day and mail-in ballots – were removed from the totals in at least 15 counties.

Time-series election data shows Trump’s votes decrementing in various counties at numerous time points instead of increasing as would be expected under normal circumstances.

The group said that Election Day vote removals happened during the vote tabulation process in at least 15 counties, including Lehigh County, Chester County, Allegheny County, Armstrong County, Westmoreland County, Northampton County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, Lackawanna County, Dauphin County, Pike County, Carbon County, Washington County, Erie County, and Luzerne County.

Meanwhile, absentee vote removals happened in Allegheny County, Chester County, and Lehigh County.

At least 432,116 votes—213,707 election day votes and 218,409 absentee votes—were removed in total.

There were vote movements across all candidates. However, we did not see the same type of negative decrements to any of the [other] candidates that we saw with President Trump’s tallies, and they happened repeatedly with no explanation,” Lynda McLaughlin, a member of the group, told The Epoch Times.

The Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.

Pennsylvania data shows Trump’s votes decrementing at various time points in Allegheny County (L) and Chester County (R), the Data Integrity Group says. (Screenshot)

The Data Integrity Group is a group of scientists, engineers, and machine learning experts who have been working together to check whether or not there was manipulation of data in the 2020 general election.

The group’s lineup of data scientists includes Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue.

Mealey is a nine-year veteran of the U.S. Navy, where he worked as an electronic warfare technician, cryptologic technician, and Arabic linguist. He worked at the NSA as a mission manager for Levant/North Africa and later worked as a CIA contractor at the National Counter-Terrorism Center.

Lobue has 12 years of experience in data science and machine learning across financial services, telecommunications, and research consulting industries. He currently specializes in artificial intelligence applications.

Data scientists from the group have analyzed the election data for several states including Arizona and Georgia.

In their analysis of Georgia’s election data, the group said it found that more than 30,000 votes had been removed from Trump’s tally, and another 12,173 votes were switched to Biden.

The group didn’t name any state official, county official, or related voting machine manufacturers for wrongdoing.

However, the group urged the state to authorize forensic audits to uphold election integrity and said it’s irresponsible to certify the results before the alleged errors and anomalies are explained.

The bottom line is the errors were made. Data confirms these errors and it shouldn’t matter if they were machine or human, they’re still errors and deserve a second review and thorough analysis with forensic audits to find the answers,” the group said.

Pennsylvania’s electors cast their votes for Biden and Kamala Harris as president-elect and vice president-elect on Dec. 14, 2020.

State-certified results show Biden won the Keystone State by 80,555 votes.

Edison Admits One Error in Vote Switching

During the vote tabulation process, the results, which are commonly known as tabulated results, are sent to the secretary of state’s office. The data is then also shared with the media via Edison Research.

Errors could be made in several steps in the election result reporting process.

Though it’s unclear what caused the errors that were flagged by the Data Integrity Group, Edison Research did admit a reporting error that happened separately.

In a widely-circulated video clip of CNN’s live election night broadcast, 19,958 votes were seen being switched from Trump to Biden in 30 seconds.

Rob Farman, executive vice president at Edison, admitted that the “switching” stemmed from a brief reporting error from Edison Research.

He told The Associated Press that a state feed from Armstrong, Pennsylvania, first showed the correct values of 24,233 votes for Trump and 4,275 for Biden, but a team member had mistakenly entered them backward—4,275 for Trump and 24,233 for Biden. Farman said the company’s quality control team discovered the error and corrected it that night.

Follow Allen on Twitter: @AllenZM

Tyler Durden
Mon, 01/04/2021 – 17:40

via ZeroHedge News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://cms.zerohedge.com/

Some don’t want us to know about safe pre-hospital treatments for Covid

When Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reached out to the White House with his discovery that a pre-hospital treatment of zinc, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin reduced by 84 percent the number of his Covid patients needing to be admitted to the hospital, it was hailed as a treatment that could save hundreds of thousands of lives.

President Trump touted the treatment as a “game changer,” but certain factions had other plans. The President’s enemies didn’t want him to get a win. Anthony Fauci, a member of the Leadership Advisory Team for the Bill & Melinda Gates’ Foundation’s “Decade of Vaccines,” immediately downplayed the treatment and pushed for a vaccine instead – without ever disclosing his conflict of interest. Next thing you knew, a drug that is sold over the counter in many countries and has been prescribed nearly 100 million times in 65 years was suddenly reported as deadly. And people believed it.

What really happened in the medical community has not been made known by the legacy media – but in this interview you will be exposed to the truth. Dr. Zelenko explains what happened, offers his ideas on why it happened, and what the motivations have been. He also explains the Zelenko protocol and how it works.

Share this interview with everyone you love so they can hear the truth – and get information that very well may save their lives.

See Dr. Zelenko’s recommended treatments and dosing:
Dr. Zelenko’s website: http://www.VladimirZelenkoMD.com

Link to Zelenko’s peer-reviewed paper on early risk-stratified treatment of zinc plus low-dose hcq and azithromycin (International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304258

LINKS FOR DANIEL:

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/newbookofdaniel
MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/newbookofdaniel
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/Newbookofdaniel
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/newbookofdaniel
Daniel’s work at UncoverDC.com: https://uncoverdc.com/?s=bobinski
NewBookofDaniel Blog: www.newbookofdaniel.com
© 2021 Shadowtrail Media, LLC

The post Some don’t want us to know about safe pre-hospital treatments for Covid appeared first on UncoverDC.

via UncoverDC

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://uncoverdc.com

Trump Awards Nunes Medal of Freedom for Exposing Obama Admin/DNC’s Russia Collusion Hoax

President Donald Trump awarded Rep. Devin Nunes of California with the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Monday, and deservedly so. Nunes, now the ranking Republican on the House Select Committee on Intelligence, was the chairman the committee for the first two years of Trump presidency, when he began to unearth the truth behind what took…

The post Trump Awards Nunes Medal of Freedom for Exposing Obama Admin/DNC’s Russia Collusion Hoax appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

NYC Landlord Facing His Own Eviction as ‘Deadbeat’ Tenants Catch Breaks from the Government

An 88-year-old Harlem landlord could soon be homeless because his tenants have refused to pay their rents for months, citing the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse. The tenants cannot be evicted because New York state’s liberal lawmakers have barred small-property owners from evicting deadbeat tenants. Exacerbating the situation is a new law passed by New York…

The post NYC Landlord Facing His Own Eviction as ‘Deadbeat’ Tenants Catch Breaks from the Government appeared first on The Western Journal.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Glenn Beck: ‘I am all for secession’ — for the FAR LEFT

On the radio program Monday, Glenn Beck said he’s "all for" secession — but there’s no reason why conservatives should be the ones to leave. He explained why he believes it’s those on the far left who should secede from the union — after all, they’re the ones who want to "fundamentally transform" our nation and abandon our Constitution, values, and the principles that separate the United States of America from every other fascistic nation in the world.

"Just like the Left won’t unite with us [and] wouldn’t unite with Donald Trump, I can’t unite with them. How am I going to unite with people that believe critical race theory is correct? Who believe that capitalism is bad? Who believe that our Constitution is flawed and our Founders were racist?" Glenn asked.

"That’s why, today, I want to let you know I am all for secession — not our secession, but theirs. They should secede from the United States of America. Here’s why," he continued. "I didn’t leave the United States of America. I didn’t leave the Constitution. I didn’t leave our heritage, our common sense … I didn’t leave science. They did.

"I didn’t leave the fundamental understandings, the underpinnings of America," Glenn said. "I didn’t leave my position on the First Amendment. They did. I didn’t change my understanding [of the First Amendment] because there is no new understanding of it. The right to free speech is absolute. The right to question my government is absolute. The right to assemble is absolute. The right of a free and unfettered press, I still believe in that. The right to practice the worship of our God the way each of us see fit, I am still for that. Why would I secede?"

Glenn went on to say he believes it is time for every American conservative to decide where they draw their line in the sand. Because whatever that line is, it’s "exactly what you’re going to get."

Watch the video below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

via Conservative Review

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.conservativereview.com/

The media are lying about Trump’s phone call with Raffensperger


The mainstream media and Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, are utterly disgraceful, dishonest, and manipulative people.  Raffensperger released a private phone call that the media immediately claimed — falsely — showed Trump begging Raffensperger to fraudulently find enough votes for Trump to win.  In fact, Trump called Raffensperger to get him to stop obstructing the fraud investigation.  As Trump explained during the call, evidence proves Trump won Georgia by a massive margin, only to have victory stolen through equally massive fraud.  Trump sought to avoid litigation forcing Raffensperger to do his job, which is to make at least a minimal effort to clear away enough fraud to allow Trump his actual and honest victory in Georgia.

Here are just two examples of the media’s dishonest claim that Trump was trying to force Raffensperger to commit fraud.  As you can see, their premise is that there is no evidence of fraud, so any action on Trump’s part to claim victory is itself fraud.  Theirs is a deliberate example of circular logic, where their premise and conclusion are the same thing.

Washington Post: “The Washington Post obtained a recording of the conversation in which Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, at one point warning that Raffensperger was taking ‘a big risk.'”

CNN: “In excerpts of the stunning one-hour phone call Saturday, Trump lambasted his fellow Republican for refusing to falsely say that he won the election in Georgia and repeatedly touted baseless claims of election fraud.”

Here’s what really happened on the phone call.  First, Trump wasn’t the only person on the phone.  Also present were Mark Meadows, Mike Pompeo, and multiple attorneys.  There isn’t the slightest chance that they would have allowed Trump to beg Raffensperger for illegal votes or to threaten him.

Second, contrary to what the media implied, Trump was not operating off the premise that he lost Georgia.  If that had been the case, it would indeed have been wrong for Trump to beg for Raffensperger to “find” votes for him.

Instead, Trump was operating from the assertion that he won Georgia.  He opened the call with a strong recitation of the facts showing massive fraud on Raffensperger’s watch.  According to Trump’s evidence, he didn’t lose by 11,780 votes; he won by well over 300,000 votes, including votes for Trump that disappeared and illegal votes for Biden.  Here are some of Trump’s statements in that regard:

“I think it’s pretty clear that we won.  We won very substantially in Georgia.”

“We have … anywhere from 250–300,000 ballots were dropped mysteriously into the rolls.”

“We think that if you check the signatures — a real check of the signatures going back in Fulton County you’ll find at least a couple of hundred thousand of forged signatures. …”

“[I]n the 50s of thousands … that’s people that went to vote and they were told they can’t vote because they’ve already been voted for.”

“It’s 4,502 who voted but they weren’t on the voter registration roll which they had to be. …”

“You had 18,325 vacant address voters.  The address was vacant and they’re not allowed to be counted.”

Trump alluded to the faked water main break that allowed Fulton County election workers to count votes for hours after having sent observers home.  He noted that the video of that after-hours voting indicated that at “the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden.”

Trump pointed to 4,925 illegal out-of-state voters, 2,326 absentee ballots from vacant addresses, 5,000 dead people voting, and improperly handled drop boxes.  And he brought up the allegations that Georgia is shredding evidence as fast as it can.

The bottom line, as Trump accurately said, is that these infractions were “many, many times the 11,779 margin [sic] that they said we lost by.”

Trump hammered over and over that he won the state.  No matter how you look at it, he said he won, and he’s got the evidence to prove it.

At this point, Mark Meadows stated what Trump’s team wanted — and it wasn’t to fake votes for Trump.  It was, instead, an honest investigation: “What I’m hopeful for is there some way that we can … find some kind of agreement to look at this a little bit more fully.”  Thus, Meadows sought an agreement “that we can at least have a discussion to look at some of these allegations to find a path forward that’s less litigious.”

Raffensperger pushed back, saying he’d already had to deal with lawsuits (ignoring that the courts refused to hear evidence).  He also huffed that “we gave our state Senate about one and a half hours of our time going through the election issue by issue and then on the state House, the government affairs committee, we gave them about two and a half hours of our time, going back point by point on all the issues of contention.  And then just a few days ago we met with our U.S. congressmen, Republican congressmen, and we gave them about two hours of our time talking about this past election.”

Did you get that?  The biggest election fraud claim in American history, the president on the phone, massive amounts of evidence, and Raffensperger whines that he’s already given up six and a half hours of his time to the issue.

Trump again chimes in to say, “We won the state.”  In response to Raffensperger’s complaint that he sacrificed six and a half hours to the matter, Trump suggests that Raffensperger does not need to invest massive time in investigating all 300,000-plus problematic votes.  He just needs to investigate 11,779 to give Trump his rightful victory.  For, as Trump says, “Because, what’s the difference between winning the election by two votes and winning it by half a million votes?  I think I probably did win it by half a million.”

When Raffensberger pushes back again, saying his office disproved the cemetery vote contention, Cleta Mitchell, a Trump attorney, makes an important point: Georgia has been withholding records from the White House.

There’s more in the conversation (much more, including a debate about the video showing Ruby Freeman repeatedly scanning the same ballots), but you get the gist.  Trump won.  A lazy, entitled, arrogant, and corrupt Raffensperger won’t work with the White House to look for fraud (or prove the absence of fraud).  And the corrupt, dissolute, dishonest American media, unless brought to heel, will be the downfall of our constitutional republic.

Image: Donald Trump “I’m just in the way” meme.

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/