Acting AG Matthew Whitaker: I Would Indict Hillary Clinton


Acting AG Matthew Whitaker: I Would Indict Hillary Clinton

Jim Hoft
by Jim Hoft
November 7, 2018

Lock her up!

As Cristina Laila reported earlier…

Jeff Sessions turned in his resignation Wednesday afternoon and the President announced Matthew Whitaker will take over his position as Acting Attorney General.

Whitaker is also taking over Rosenstein’s job overseeing the Mueller witch hunt.

Matthew Whitaker is described as a “Trump loyalist” who has been privately described as the West Wing’s “eyes and ears” in the Justice Departmentsays the New York Times.

In August of 2017, Matthew Whitaker penned an op-ed for CNN titled, “Mueller’s Investigation of Trump is Going Too Far” wherein he argued the Special Counsel is roving outside of his jurisdiction to investigate Trump-Russia collusion.

And there’s more…
in July 2016, before the presidential election, Matthew Whitaker penned an opinion piece for USA today where he argued that Hillary Clinton should be locked up.

Whitaker wrote:

According to FBI Director James Comey’s statement on Tuesday, former secretary of State Hillary Clinton could have been charged with violating several different code sections, and he detailed the evidence that supports bringing criminal charges.

Yet, Director Comey’s judgment was that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring the case. I disagree. I believe myself to have been a reasonable prosecutor, and when the facts and evidence show a criminal violation has been committed, the individuals involved should not dictate whether the case is prosecuted

…A reasonable prosecutor may ask, if on numerous occasions, an unknown State Department employee had taken top secret information from a secured system, emailed that information on a Gmail account, and stored the information on a personal server for years, would that individual be prosecuted? I believe they would.

Hat Tip T. Wictor

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Accuses ICE of ‘Human Rights Violations’ in Victory Speech


Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 29, became the youngest woman elected to Congress on Tuesday evening. In her victory speech, the congresswoman-elect criticized U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), accusing the agency of committing human rights abuses.

NBC News projected the far-left candidate would go on to defeat her Republican rival and St. John’s University professor Anthony Pappas in New York’s 14th Congressional District with 74.4 percent of the votes counted.

Ocasio-Cortez shocked many in New York politics, including herself, when she came out of nowhere to defeat 10-term Rep. Joe Crowley in New York’s Democratic congressional primary last spring. The victory made her the national face of young, discontented Democrats — often women and minorities — trying to move their party to the left. She takes the record for the youngest woman elected to Congress from Rep. Elise Stefanik, a Republican representing upstate New York who was elected at age 30.

“This is what is possible when everyday people come together in the collective realization that all our actions… are powerful, worthwhile, and capable of lasting change,” Ocasio-Cortez told attendees during her victory speech.

“Words cannot express my gratitude to every organizer, every small-dollar donor, every working parent and Dreamer who helped make this movement happen,” she added. “And that’s exactly what this is, not a campaign or an Election Day but a movement… for social, economic and racial justice.”

“We launched this campaign because no one was clearly and authentically talking about issues like the corrupting role of money in politics. Like the disturbing human rights violations being committed by ICE,” Ocasio-Cortez continued. “By the fact that no one was giving a voice to the idea, to the notion that an entire generation is graduating with crippling loads of student loans debt that’s a ticking time bomb for our economy.”

Ocasio-Cortez was born in the Bronx but raised in suburban Westchester County. Her father passed away while she was a student at Boston University in 2008. A self-described “Democratic socialist,” Ocasio-Cortez got her start in politics as an organizer for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Among several far-left policy positions, the congresswoman-elect supports a national $15 minimum wage, universal health care coverage, and the abolishment of ICE.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Biggest loser at midterms? Barack Obama


The midterms weren’t a blue wave, but they weren’t shark fin soup for Republicans either, given that they lost the House by a small margin.


That said, the big loser who stands out here is hard-campaigning President Obama, the guy who thought he was the star of the Democratic Party and who, throwing the tradition of former presidents staying aloof from politics out the window, campaigned hard, long, and loud, for Democrats in this midterm. Turns out the ones he fought the hardest for lost.



Now he stands exposed as politically irrelevant, powerless, an embarrassment. Sorry ’bout that legacy thing, Barry-O.


First, he did some easy ones and those candidates marched right through, Obama or no Obama:


Tim Kaine of Virginia and Joe Manchin of West Virginia for the Senate, Jennifer Wexton of Virginia for the House. J.B. Pritzker for the Illinois governorship. A couple of minor leaguers for the House in Illinois as tag-alongs. 


Kaine and Pritzker, given their ties to the Obama administration, were probably favors repaid, and they ran in blue states, anyway, as did the Illinois pickups. Manchin, meanwhile, was primarily re-elected on his Kavanaugh vote, so Obama was likely irrelevant.


But then there were the midterm campaigns that weren’t gimmes, some very high profile, and high media-exposure ones: Joe Donnelly of Indiana for Senate. Bill Nelson of Florida for Senate. Andrew Gillum of Florida for governor. Stacey Abrams of Georgia for governor.


Those were the ones Obama went hoarse campaigning for, yelling and waving his arms, voice cracking, speeches described as fiery, telling voters to vote for these guys or die. With Gillum in particular, racial appeals were a factor and Obama’s presence was supposed to help. Gillum had a big media buildup about being a first black governor of Florida as an argument to draw votes, and he later cried racism to fend off corruption allegations. Adding Obama to campaign was obviously part of the appeal. This time, the race-politics identity card simply failed.


And Obama? What did he get? Zilch. Zip. Zero. Nada. The voters rather noticibly rejected the ex-president’s appeal for votes. Been there, done that.


A prized and coveted Obama endorsement, or campaign stop, obviously isn’t the election winner in a tight race it used to be. In fact, with these midterms, when it matters, Obama’s a bust. The lesson here that Democrats will surely notice is that it’s largely useless. 


Obama will be not be easy to get off the stage, given his love for the limelight. But I suspect we will be hearing a lot less about Obama on the campaign trail, except in the easiest of races, as the reality of what happened among Democrats starts to sink in.


Update: Washington Examiner argues that it was Obama’s ego that did him in.


Image credit: MSNBC, via YouTube, screengrab


The midterms weren’t a blue wave, but they weren’t shark fin soup for Republicans either, given that they lost the House by a small margin.


That said, the big loser who stands out here is hard-campaigning President Obama, the guy who thought he was the star of the Democratic Party and who, throwing the tradition of former presidents staying aloof from politics out the window, campaigned hard, long, and loud, for Democrats in this midterm. Turns out the ones he fought the hardest for lost.


Now he stands exposed as politically irrelevant, powerless, an embarrassment. Sorry ’bout that legacy thing, Barry-O.


First, he did some easy ones and those candidates marched right through, Obama or no Obama:


Tim Kaine of Virginia and Joe Manchin of West Virginia for the Senate, Jennifer Wexton of Virginia for the House. J.B. Pritzker for the Illinois governorship. A couple of minor leaguers for the House in Illinois as tag-alongs. 


Kaine and Pritzker, given their ties to the Obama administration, were probably favors repaid, and they ran in blue states, anyway, as did the Illinois pickups. Manchin, meanwhile, was primarily re-elected on his Kavanaugh vote, so Obama was likely irrelevant.


But then there were the midterm campaigns that weren’t gimmes, some very high profile, and high media-exposure ones: Joe Donnelly of Indiana for Senate. Bill Nelson of Florida for Senate. Andrew Gillum of Florida for governor. Stacey Abrams of Georgia for governor.


Those were the ones Obama went hoarse campaigning for, yelling and waving his arms, voice cracking, speeches described as fiery, telling voters to vote for these guys or die. With Gillum in particular, racial appeals were a factor and Obama’s presence was supposed to help. Gillum had a big media buildup about being a first black governor of Florida as an argument to draw votes, and he later cried racism to fend off corruption allegations. Adding Obama to campaign was obviously part of the appeal. This time, the race-politics identity card simply failed.


And Obama? What did he get? Zilch. Zip. Zero. Nada. The voters rather noticibly rejected the ex-president’s appeal for votes. Been there, done that.


A prized and coveted Obama endorsement, or campaign stop, obviously isn’t the election winner in a tight race it used to be. In fact, with these midterms, when it matters, Obama’s a bust. The lesson here that Democrats will surely notice is that it’s largely useless. 


Obama will be not be easy to get off the stage, given his love for the limelight. But I suspect we will be hearing a lot less about Obama on the campaign trail, except in the easiest of races, as the reality of what happened among Democrats starts to sink in.


Update: Washington Examiner argues that it was Obama’s ego that did him in.


Image credit: MSNBC, via YouTube, screengrab




via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/

‘PATRIARCHY!’ Democrats Blame, Shame ‘White Women’ For Losses In Key States

As the much-anticipated "Blue Wave" failed to materialize Tuesday night, Democrats started looking for someone to blame, but targets were few: the pollsters had mostly gotten the election right, their well-financed and celebrity-endorsed candidates had become national sensations, and their target demographics turned out to vote in droves.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

MoveOn Largest Facebook Political Advertiser for Week Before Election


MoveOn, a George Soros-funded anti-Republican PAC, was allegedly the biggest political Facebook advertisement spender last week — the final week before the midterm elections.

MoveOn’s Washington Director, Ben Wikler, bragged about the PAC’s advertisement budget, along with its “secret weapon” against the Republican Party, which consisted of using hundreds of videos of voters explaining why they’re voting Democrat.

“Nationwide, @MoveOn was the biggest spender on political ads on Facebook last week,” declared Wikler on Twitter, Monday. “Today, we’re pulling back the curtains on this election’s ‘secret weapon’: a groundbreaking new way to do digital ads that leapfrogs the GOP’s political tech.”

“Traditional political advertising works like this: campaigns run polls to see what voters care about. They choose a message. They spend ~$10k-30k to shoot & edit. If they’re smart, they test them, often via dial-test or focus groups. Then they pay to put them online & on TV,” continued Wikler. “This year, MoveOn turned that model on its head. We started by asking real voters in key races why they’re supporting their Democratic candidates. We collected more than 2500 authentic, unscripted videos—people talking into their phones.”

“We used a new, rapid, low-cost, and highly accurate technique to test whether the ads moved people. Classic scientific experiment, with randomized treatment and control groups. We found 260 videos that worked as extraordinarily persuasive political ads,” he proclaimed, adding, “We used Facebook’s targeting technology to run the 260 ads to people matching the specific folks who found them persuasive in our tests, across 89 House races, 10 Senate races, and 10 governors’ races. In all, we’re reaching more than 20 million potential voters in key areas.”

Wikler then declared that the advertisements “don’t look slick. They look real. Because they are.”

“That might help explain their impact. Or maybe it’s the topics people talked about—not stuff brainstormed on a consultant’s whiteboard, just actual people speaking from the heart… Regardless of exactly why, the most striking thing about this program: it actually *works* to move votes,” Wikler concluded. “Which is, unfortunately, a very rare thing in politics.”
On its official website, MoveOn, which is financially backed by socialist billionaire George Soros, explains its goal is to “end Republican control of Congress,” and promote a “progressive future,” and the PAC frequently uses the hashtag #ResistAndWin.

Charlie Nash is a reporter for Breitbart Tech. You can follow him on Twitter @MrNashington, or like his page at Facebook.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Politifact Rates Verbatim Manchin Quote Threatening Violence ‘Mostly True’

Politifact reported it was only "mostly true" that Democratic incumbent senator Joe Manchin (W.Va.) said he wanted to "beat the living crap out of" his Republican opponent Patrick Morrisey.

The Washington Free Beacon reported Manchin’s remarks at a campaign event in Marmet, W. Va., over the weekend, where the Democrat bragged that "it took every bit of my discipline not to beat the living crap out of" Morrisey during their debate.

The line got applause from a room full of Democrats, and Manchin used it again during his next campaign stop in Logan, W. Va.

During that event, the Democrat said he could barely stop himself from "kicking the living crap" out of Morrisey.

The comments were tweeted by the West Virginia Republican Party. "What did Joe Manchin say about civility?" the Republican group said. "Today, he said he wanted to ‘beat the living crap out of’ his Republican opponent during their debate."

PolitiFact ruled it was only "mostly true" that Manchin wanted to "beat the living crap" out of Morrisey, since Manchin said "it took every bit of his discipline" not to.

PolitiFact claimed the West Virginia Republican Party "twisted Manchin’s words" by quoting Manchin verbatim.

The liberal fact-checking website then justified Manchin’s comments because Manchin felt "frustration" during his debate against Morrisey.

"In Marmet, Manchin did express his frustration with Morrisey’s attacks in the recent debate—enough frustration to feel an impulse to ‘beat the living crap out of’ his opponent," PolitiFact reported. "But the tweet leaves out an element of what Manchin said—that ‘it took every bit of my discipline’ not to do it."

"In other words, by the time he was speaking in Marmet, he had already extinguished that impulse," PolitiFact said.

However, PolitiFact was inclined to report that Manchin’s comments about wanting to beat up his Republican opponent "does seem to conflict with a prior pledge in favor of civility."

"In February 2018, Manchin took to the Senate floor to pledge ‘an era of bipartisan cooperation and agreement in order to restore civility to the United States Senate and our political discourse,’" the website reported. "Manchin urged his colleagues to join him in co-signing his pledge and ‘taking the first step to show the American people that they are here to work towards a better United States.’"

Ultimately, PolitiFact ruled the West Virginia Republican Party tweet was "mostly true" because the tweet "needs clarification."

Manchin used the line multiple times during his closing argument to West Virginia voters. He repeated the line at a separate event during a pig roast in Logan during his next campaign stop.

"I don’t know if you had a chance to see the debate we had the other night," Manchin said Saturday evening.

"It took everything I had to keep from kicking the living crap out of him," he said.

The post Politifact Rates Verbatim Manchin Quote Threatening Violence ‘Mostly True’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://freebeacon.com

Desperate John Brennan Begs People to Defeat Trump-Supporting Candidates… So He Doesn’t Go to Jail


Desperate John Brennan Begs People to Defeat Trump-Supporting Candidates… So He Doesn’t Go to Jail

Cristina Laila
by Cristina Laila
November 5, 2018


John Brennan

Former CIA Chief-turned-Twitter-troll John Brennan begged people to vote to defeat Trump-supporting candidates in the midterms.

Brennan is afraid of the House Intel investigation into his role promoting Hillary’s fake Russia dossier.

If the Democrats take the House, the investigation spearheaded by Chairman Nunes will come to a halt.

The Dems are also threatening to launch investigations if they take the House.

Nancy Pelosi even threatened to use subpoena power as a negotiating tool if the Dems take the House.

Brennan is desperate…

BRENNAN: Opportunity to repudiate @realDonaldTrump & to restore Congressional ability to thwart his recklessness & fear mongering arrives tomorrow. Vote for individuals who represent the best of America. In this election, those who stand with Trump must be defeated. Vote!

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com