Here’s Quentin Tarantino Defending Roman Polanski’s Rape Of A 13-Year-Old

Before the Harvey Weinstein scandal, “woke” Hollywood liberals had no idea that rape was a bad thing. After Harvey, they still don’t know that, but pretend that they do. Well, some of them do. When it comes to child-molester Woody Allen or child-rapist Roman Polanski, Hollywood is still living in denial. Quentin Tarantino, who made an assload of money with Weinstein, also defended Polanski’s rape of a 13-year-old girl, because he is just an awful human being.

In 1977 film director Roman Polanski drugged 13-year-old Samantha Gailey and sodomized her. He was arrested and convicted of sexual assault but skipped the country before sentencing. He now lives in France, shielded from extradition to the US, and celebrities love him.

Last October fellow film director Quentin Tarantino was on Howard Stern and was asked how Hollywood could support a rapist like Polanski.

“He didn’t rape a 13-year-old. It was statutory rape. That’s not quite the same thing. He had sex with a minor. That’s not rape. To me, when you use the word rape, you’re talking about violent, throwing them down—it’s like one of the most violent crimes in the world. You can’t throw the word rape around. It’s like throwing the word ‘racist’ around. It doesn’t apply to everything people use it for. He was guilty of having sex with a minor,” said Tarantino.

Wait, didn’t Tarantino call all cops murderers and then “apologize” by saying it’s because they are all white supremacists? Seems like he throws the word racist around, but he was probably defending himself against people who take issue with his gratuitous use of the N-word.

Robin Givens pointed out that Polanski had drugged the girl with quaaludes and alcohol and that she wasn’t a willing participant.

“No, that was not the case at all. She wanted to have it and dated the guy and…,” protested Tarantino.

Givens interrupted with, “She was 13!”

“And by the way, we’re talking about America’s morals, not talking about the morals in Europe and everything,” said Tarantino.

This has nothing to do with morals, something Hollywood lacks, it’s about the law and in California it is illegal for a man to drug and rape a 13-year-old girl. Just because something may be acceptable in Europe, and I’m not convinced that what Polanski did was legal over there either, doesn’t mean it can be done in the US.

“Wait a second. If you have sex with a 13-year-old girl and you’re a grown man, you know that that’s wrong,” interjected Stern.

“Giving her booze and pills,” added Givens.

“Look, she was down with this,” proclaimed Tarantino.

After a long argument, Tarantino stated that it’s not rape with, “these 13-year-old party girls.”

This is just a long way of saying Tarantino is a piece of shit. He was also aware that his producer Harvey Weinstein was guilty of sexual misconduct with actresses including his own girlfriend, but decided to stay silent so he could continue making movies.

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

CBS Finally Covers Colts Player Killed By Illegal, Warns of ‘Politicization’

CBS on Tuesday finally covered the tragic story of the Indianapolis Colts player who was killed in a car crash over the weekend after a drunk, illegal alien crashed into him. Yet, This Morning reporter David Begnaud cautioned against “politicizing” the death of Edwin Jackson. NBC is still ignoring the crime. 

Providing the details, Begnaud explained, “The driver of the truck, Manuel Orrego-Savala, was arrested with a blood alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit. According to a police affidavit, the suspect used an alias and was in the country illegally.” 

 

 

Jackson’s Uber driver was also killed. 

The journalist quoted Republican Congressman Todd Rokita declaring that America should be “building a wall, ending sanctuary cities and stopping illegal immigration once and for all.”

Without providing meaningful context of what his actual question was, Begnaud featured a clip of Jackson’s roommate asserting, “Absolutely not. [Jackson] would not want that.” The journalist added, “Bouchez says Jackson wouldn’t have want this tragedy to be politicized.” 

The online version of the story pointed out that Donald Trump tweeted about the Colts player’s death. 

Despite four hours of available air time, the journalists at NBC’s Today refused to cover the football player’s death. Instead, the show’s hosts devoted two and a half minutes to actress Uma Thurman being injured while driving a stunt car for a 2003 movie.

So, to be clear, a car accident on the set of a movie 15 years ago — with no fatalities — gets coverage. But two men getting killed by an illegal doesn’t warrant any?  

Perhaps someone should alert Chuck Todd about this case. After all, on January 30 he referred to the “mythical immigrant criminal.” 

On Monday night, CBS and NBC skipped the death of Edwin Jackson

A transcript of the segment can be found below by clicking on “expand.” 

CBS This Morning
2/6/18
7:31:58 to 7:34:48 

NORAH O’DONNELL: Police say the suspected drunk driver who allegedly killed an Indianapolis Colts player is in the U.S. illegally. Linebacker Edwin Jackson and his Uber driver were killed Sunday when Manuel Orrego-Savala reportedly crashed him into. Orrego-Savala is a Guatemalan citizen. David Begnaud shows us how the case is intensifying the national debate on  immigration. David, good morning. 

DAVID BEGNAUD: Norah, good morning. Edwin Jackson’s teammates affectionately called his Poundcake. In his first season with the Indianapolis Colts, he was their number three tackler. Last season he was sidelined with an injury. And police say his life ended when someone who had previously been deported from the U.S. twice hit him with a vehicle. The Indianapolis Colts say Edwin Jackson was admired for his hard work and competitive spirit. 

EDWIN JACKSON: I like to run fast. I like to make big plays. Everybody wants to make big plays. 

BEGNAUD: Around 4:00 Sunday morning in Indianapolis, Jackson and his Uber driver, Jeffrey Monroe, were killed. Their car was pulled over on the side of interstate 70 because Jackson felt sick. Both of the men were outside of the vehicle when a black Ford F-150 truck plowed into them. The force of the impact threw one of the men into the center lane where he was later accidentally struck by a state police vehicle. 

CHAD BOUCHEZ: He looked at me like a brother just like I looked at him like a brother. 

BEGNAUD: That’s Jackson’s roommate, Chad Bouchez, who had gone out with him the night he was killed. 

BOUCHEZ: He actually did the right thing and he took an Uber. He was making the right steps to get home safely and not put anyone in harm’s way. 

BEGNAUD: The driver of the truck, Manuel Orrego-Savala, was arrested with a blood alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit. According to a police affidavit, the suspect used an alias and was in the country illegally. Investigators say he was deported to Guatemala in 2007 and again in 2009. In response to news of Jackson’s death, Congressman Todd Rokita said in a statement, “We must ensure this never happens again by building a wall ending sanctuary cities and stopping illegal immigration once and for all.” 

BOUCHEZ: Absolutely not. He would not want that. 

BEGNAUD: Bouchez says Jackson wouldn’t have want this tragedy to be politicized. 

BOUCHEZ: I don’t think he would want Edwin would have judged on where they’re from or anything else. 

BEGNAUD: So, this suspect is in jail awaiting charges. He’s supposed to be in court tomorrow. State police investigators are working with U.S. federal immigration officials, and they have placed an immigration hold on him. So, even if bail is set, there’s no way he’s getting out of jail for now. 

GAYLE KING: That story was sad, but to hear he was doing all the right things by getting another driver not to endanger other people and still ends up not with us any longer. Thank you very much. 
 

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

HANNITY WARNS: Senate Has Released Memo 2.0 “Exposing Deep State Corruption” — “You Should Be Scared”

HANNITY WARNS: Senate Has Released Memo 2.0 “Exposing Deep State Corruption” — “You Should Be Scared”

In a Fox News op-ed Tuesday, media icon Sean Hannity warned the Senate Judiciary Committee’s second ‘memo,’ should ‘scare,’ the American people. 

Credit: Fox News

Hannity writes:

Senators Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham have released a heavily redacted, yet very revealing copy of their criminal referral against ex-British spy Christopher Steele, the author of the dubious dossier we now know was parlayed into a FISA warrant by Trump-hating operatives at the Justice Department. Grassley and Graham tell us that, while working on a second dossier for Clinton opposition research firm Fusion GPS, Steele was being fed information directly from the Obama State Department and from Clinton allies as well as his usual, sketchy Russian sources. That’s right, teams Clinton and Obama were working with a foreign spy to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump. […]

The Grassley-Graham memo goes on to say “it’s troubling enough that the Clinton campaign funded Mr. Steele’s work, but [worse] that these Clinton associates were contemporaneously feeding Mr. Steele’s allegations. It raises huge additional concerns about his credibility.” […]

The incestuous ties between Fusion, Steele, the Clinton campaign and the Obama Justice Department are alarming. Clinton hired Fusion, which hired Steele. Steele was working with the FBI at the same time. The wife of a top Justice Department official, Bruce Ohr, was hired by Fusion to work with Steele. […]

You should be scared. And disgusted.

In a letter released Monday, Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) outed the FBI for attempting to suppress the release of new revelations about the Steele dossier.

In the same letter, Grassley and Graham say that Steele, penned a separate memo on then-candidate Donald Trump, based on information given to him by a Hillary Clinton contact and unnamed Obama State Department official.

According to the New York Post’s Paul Sperry, the Senate Judiciary Committee is working to declassify intel on Steele.

“The Senate Judiciary Committee also has a memo on Steele, the dossier and the FBI, and is working to get it declassified,” tweeted Sperry last week.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Steele was a no sh0w at a London court Monday amid fallout stemming from the FISA abuse memo released last Friday.

When Fox News reached out for comment, Steele associate Chris Burrows, replied “I regret that for a number of reasons, Chris Steele is not available to speak on or off the record about this subject.”

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Comey’s Assistant Leaves FBI. The Flyer For His Farewell Party Is Disturbing.

On Tuesday, Saagar Enjeti of The Daily Caller uncovered a copy of a flyer for the farewell party for former FBI director James Comey’s assistant, Josh Campbell. Here it is:

Note the ridiculousness of the statement on the flyer that colleagues will “celebrate his new endeavor defending the Bureau as a CNN Law Enforcement Analyst!”

That’s a problem for CNN, and it’s a problem for the FBI. First off, CNN should be insulted to hire someone whose entire job will presumably be defending the FBI from outside assault – wouldn’t a law enforcement analyst, you know, analyze law enforcement? It’s also a problem for the FBI – your job at the FBI isn’t to defend the FBI, but to enforce the law. Once your job becomes “defender of the institution,” you’re at risk of corrupting the goal on behalf of the organization.

If you want to give the impression that the FBI serves the people and not itself, and that it doesn’t have its own political agenda, this isn’t the way to do it.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

WATCH: Trump Praises Pelosi As GOP’s ‘Secret Weapon,’ Begs For Her Not To Go

President Donald Trump ridiculed House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Monday, calling her the GOP’s “secret weapon” in the upcoming 2018 midterm elections.

Speaking at a factory in Ohio, Trump slammed Pelosi for calling the $1,000-plus bonuses and wage increases that American workers are receiving from the GOP tax reform, “crumbs,” and “pathetic.”

“Nancy Pelosi again said that’s ‘crumbs’,” Trump told the crowd. “Well, she’s a rich woman who lives in a big, beautiful house in California who wants to give all of your money away.”

“She’s our secret weapon. I just hope they [the Democrats] don’t change her. She’s really out there. And I’m supposed to make a deal with her?”

WATCH:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Circus Child Sex Ring: ‘Blood Rituals’ Performed On 8-Year-Old Boys

A child sex abuse ring operating out of a circus school in western Sydney, Australia, forced young boys under the age of eight to undergo sadistic “blood rituals.”

According to The Sun, “four women, two men, and a teenage girl will face 127 charges relating to the alleged ongoing torture between 2014 and 2016 in the Blue Mountains, New South Wales.”

The Arcade Circus promotes itself as a “family friendly environment” that offers classes in juggling, aerial skills, acrobatics and unicycle riding. The circus training school website says: “All students are treated as equals and every student will feel welcome from their first day.”

After several reports of the sex abuse ring, detectives from the Child Abuse and Sex Crimes Squad began investigating in July of last year. Arrests were made on Monday.

Details of the alleged abuse were not released, however the charges are staggering.

“A 58-year-old woman, is listed to appear in Penrith Local Court on today,” reports The Sun. “She has been charged with 43 offenses, including aggravated sexual assault of a child under 10, sexual intercourse with a child under 10 and aggravated kidnapping.”

A lawyer representing four of the people charged with the horrific crimes told a court they all say “we didn’t do it.”

More from The Sun:

Three women and a man will face 69 charges relating to the alleged ongoing abuse of the boys, who were all under eight years old and connected to the school, between 2014 and 2016.

The four accused are linked to a circus school in Katoomba, around 100 kilometres west of Sydney’s CBD in the New South Wales Blue Mountains.

Solicitor Bryan Wrench appeared on behalf of the arrested three women aged 58, 29 and 26 and a 52-year-old man at the Penrith Local Court this afternoon.

“My first application today is that I would like it specifically noted that we are entering pleas of not guilty for all sequences, in all matters,” Mr. Wrench told Magistrate Stephen Corry. “They simply say we didn’t do it and there’s another side to the story [presented] by police and the media.”

Earlier this year, the famous circus clown who played “Grandma” confessed to coercing a 16-year-old teenage performer to strip and pose naked for pornographic pictures in 2004.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

Tony Dungy Under Fire For Statements About Christianity And Faith. Here’s His Response.

NBC Sports analyst and former NFL coach Tony Dungy has been hit with a backlash after making approving statements about Philadelphia Eagle’s Quarterback Nick Foles’ Christian faith.

On-air, Dungy suggested Foles’ faith would help him play with confidence and boost his performance. He echoed this strain of thought on social media and reported what Foles, who is likewise open about his Christian faith, told him:

This was enough to set-off the perpetually offended. One Twitter user, for example, tagged Dungy’s employer and stated that it was “unbelievable” for the analyst to “spout this nonsense on the air.”

Dungy did not remain silent, but responded to the criticism.

“NBC pays me to express my opinion,” he wrote. “And it was my opinion that Nick Foles would play well because his Christian faith would allow him to to play with confidence. And that he’s a good QB. I think I was right on both counts.”

Houston-based sports writer Stephanie Stradley also chimed-in with discontent over the former coach’s comments. “I’m just not wanting it as a part of football analysis,” she said.

“But if he tells me Christ says that to him, I shouldn’t report it???” Dungy pointedly asked.

The backlash was not constrained to social media. Reacting to the mild Christian-centered commentary, Kyle Koster, writing at The Big Lead, said NBC and the public should check Dungy when his religious beliefs “seep into his analyst role.”

“Dungy expressing his beliefs on his personal time and platform is one thing. And even if I disagree with him sometimes, I appreciate his candor and willingness to open himself up for criticism. But when his beliefs seep into his analyst role — either unintentionally or otherwise — they should be checked, both by NBC and the public,” wrote Koster, in a piece titled, “Is Tony Dungy Analyzing or Evangelizing When It Comes to Nick Foles?”

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

College Students Protest Play About Illegal Immigrant But Celebrate ‘Whiteness Group’ That Bars Whites Asking Questions of People Of Color

At Kenyon College, in Gambier, Ohio, a satirical play about one Guatemalan illegal immigrant who wound up at the college drew an incendiary response, forcing the playwright to cancel the play’s production, while at the same time the students celebrate a new student group called “the whiteness group,” whose founder reportedly said at the group’s first meeting, “Racism is a white people problem.”

Professor Wendy Mcleod’s latest play, The Good Samaritan, was partly drawn from the real-life story of a group of men in Marion County smuggling Guatemalan workers and forcing them to work on an egg farm for up to 12 hours per day. Mcleod noted in an email to the college about the play that the immigrants “had been working without pay and living in dire conditions.” As the Kenyon Collegian reports, the play poses the question of what would happen if one of the illegal immigrants escaped from the egg farm and is found by a white student who finds him in the backseat of her car, prompting a discussion in a dorm room by white students deciding what to do.

After deciding to cancel the play after the fury expressed by members of the campus community over the portrayal of the illegal immigrant, Mcleod sent the student body an email, stating, “I know some struggled with script’s satiric elements, but Freud aptly wrote that humor is about ‘bringing the repressed to light.’”

That prompted this sanctimonious response from the editors of the Kenyon Collegian: “The issue here is not one of repression — which can be a self-inflicted act — but of systemic oppression. Mcleod fails to take responsibility for her role in perpetuating damaging stereotypes in a time when profound dangers face those who are undocumented immigrants in this country … In an age when the real lives of immigrants are used as bargaining chips in congressional budget meetings, isn’t it time we take responsibility for our own actions? Isn’t it time that those individuals who hold positions of power are held accountable?”

Meanwhile, a student named Juniper Cruz created a student group called “The Whiteness Group.” The group’s rules state, “No white person can ask a person of color questions; white people must try to answer their questions for themselves. And no spreading rumors about what people say during the meetings.” At the first meeting, some attendees defined whiteness as “power,” or as “lacking a historical perspective.”

Rachel Kessler, the priest-in-charge and chaplain of the Harcourt Parish, who attended the second meeting of the group, emailed the Kenyon Collegian, “As white people, we can become paralyzed by our sense of shame for our racial privilege or by our fear of accidentally saying something problematic. Neither of those impulses are actually productive for combating racism and white supremacy.”

When defenders of Mcleod’s right to produce her play articulated their concerns, they were shot down by students; after Professor Fred Baumann told a panel discussing the cancellation of the play, “Today is the end of [liberal education at Kenyon College],” one student stated on Facebook that if liberal education “necessitates the silencing of marginalized communities, the protection of racism, and our complicity with both, then let the damned thing die.”

Mcleod sent a January 6 email to the campus suggesting a public forum to discuss the play; she intended to explain “what inspired and informed the play, the story it tells, and how comedy can be a force for change.” She later said she would not attend “in the hopes that the community can get to issues larger than a single play.”

The Latinx student association Adelante issued a public statement reading:

It is inexcusable that you fail to offer an apology to the group directly affected by the representations in your play, those of us who, on top of constantly justifying and affirming our presence on this campus, have to now bear the emotional and psychological labor of expressing to the wider Kenyon community, within the confines of ‘civil discourse,’ why these misrepresentations are detrimental … it would be an opportunity for yourself, as well as everyone in attendance, to genuinely hear the voices of Latinx youths, voices that have been historically silenced.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com/rss.xml

The Progressive Kingdom of Hate

A cacophony of liberal voices are crying that the current climate of rancor and divisiveness that permeates and seems to be splitting these once-United States is the fault of one man — Donald Trump.


Really? How about a little perspective?



Ten years ago, many on the right, myself included, were horrified when Barack Obama was elected president because we considered him a lightweight, a career opportunist whose carefully managed resume touched all the right buttons but was so thin it could have been written on rice paper. Despite having written two books about himself by the age of 45, he hadn’t actually done much.


Leadership is honed, and for presidents, that honing can be done in only three places: business, government, or the military. Obama had no business experience, and he was certainly no Eisenhower, so that left government, and Obama’s record there was rather short and filled with an unusual number of “present” votes, meaning “I was there but didn’t want to commit.”


Even more troubling than Obama’s rice-paper resume was his ideological bent, which seemed to be straight out of Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky, who, like Obama, had been a “community organizer” with strong socialist leanings.


What we on the right did not do, though, immediately after Obama won the election was start “resist” and “not my president” movements. We did not spend days rioting in the streets. We did not demand that he be impeached even before he took office so that he could not be sworn in, something that I’m pretty sure is a legal impossibility. And I’m not talking about internet trolls or political outliers, I’m talking about elected members of Congress, major media figures, and a shrill and vacuous cast of Hollywood halfwits.


Nor did we demand that Obama’s pick for attorney general immediately recuse himself from, say, the birther controversy. Nor did we insist on the appointment of a special counsel to investigate and prosecute him. We did not attack Obama’s family. Ninety percent of the media coverage of Obama during his first year in office was not negative. In fact, I suspect the ratio was just the opposite, if not even more favorable than 90 percent.


We did not use a bogus (you can call it unverified if you insist) document paid for by the failed opposition candidate to launch a months-long wiretap of one of Obama’s campaign advisors, with the obvious intent to capture on tape something that we could use to impeach the president.


The Left did that and more. A lot more.


I don’t see a climate of divisiveness so much as I see a climate of unhinged, unmitigated hate, not only for President Trump, but for any of us who voted for him and support him.



To you, we’re not principled people who disagree with you on key issues like taxes, foreign policy, the environment, and immigration. We’re stupid, we’re evil, we’re racists, we’re Nazis, we’re deplorable; we hate women, children, and old people, we support mass shootings, and above all we want to destroy the earth (because we actually have another place to live just waiting for us). In short, we are monsters, at least in your eyes, and you remind us of it every single day.


So if you want to point the finger of blame at someone for this new level of divisiveness, I suggest you point no further than the nearest mirror.


Chuck Hustmyre; www.chuckhustmyre.com; www.imdb.me/chuckhustmyre


A cacophony of liberal voices are crying that the current climate of rancor and divisiveness that permeates and seems to be splitting these once-United States is the fault of one man — Donald Trump.


Really? How about a little perspective?


Ten years ago, many on the right, myself included, were horrified when Barack Obama was elected president because we considered him a lightweight, a career opportunist whose carefully managed resume touched all the right buttons but was so thin it could have been written on rice paper. Despite having written two books about himself by the age of 45, he hadn’t actually done much.


Leadership is honed, and for presidents, that honing can be done in only three places: business, government, or the military. Obama had no business experience, and he was certainly no Eisenhower, so that left government, and Obama’s record there was rather short and filled with an unusual number of “present” votes, meaning “I was there but didn’t want to commit.”


Even more troubling than Obama’s rice-paper resume was his ideological bent, which seemed to be straight out of Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky, who, like Obama, had been a “community organizer” with strong socialist leanings.


What we on the right did not do, though, immediately after Obama won the election was start “resist” and “not my president” movements. We did not spend days rioting in the streets. We did not demand that he be impeached even before he took office so that he could not be sworn in, something that I’m pretty sure is a legal impossibility. And I’m not talking about internet trolls or political outliers, I’m talking about elected members of Congress, major media figures, and a shrill and vacuous cast of Hollywood halfwits.


Nor did we demand that Obama’s pick for attorney general immediately recuse himself from, say, the birther controversy. Nor did we insist on the appointment of a special counsel to investigate and prosecute him. We did not attack Obama’s family. Ninety percent of the media coverage of Obama during his first year in office was not negative. In fact, I suspect the ratio was just the opposite, if not even more favorable than 90 percent.


We did not use a bogus (you can call it unverified if you insist) document paid for by the failed opposition candidate to launch a months-long wiretap of one of Obama’s campaign advisors, with the obvious intent to capture on tape something that we could use to impeach the president.


The Left did that and more. A lot more.


I don’t see a climate of divisiveness so much as I see a climate of unhinged, unmitigated hate, not only for President Trump, but for any of us who voted for him and support him.



To you, we’re not principled people who disagree with you on key issues like taxes, foreign policy, the environment, and immigration. We’re stupid, we’re evil, we’re racists, we’re Nazis, we’re deplorable; we hate women, children, and old people, we support mass shootings, and above all we want to destroy the earth (because we actually have another place to live just waiting for us). In short, we are monsters, at least in your eyes, and you remind us of it every single day.


So if you want to point the finger of blame at someone for this new level of divisiveness, I suggest you point no further than the nearest mirror.


Chuck Hustmyre; www.chuckhustmyre.com; www.imdb.me/chuckhustmyre






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/