Latest FBI Hate Crime Stats Are Huge Bad News for Liberal Muslims

There is a myth that is perpetrated by the left-wing liberal media. It’s the idea that since 9/11, any attack by Islamist extremists will result in a backlash in hate crimes by the American people against Muslims — putting American Muslims in constant danger.

In essence, the mainstream media story goes, the United States is a nation of ugly Islamophobia.

The latest data in a recent FBI report, however, completely destroys that myth.

To take a first glance at the raw data, you might come to the same conclusion as liberal media; that hate crimes are on the rise. After all, there were 307 hate crime incidents against U.S. Muslims in 2016 alone.

The Truth Revolt writes: “The most recent FBI report does reveal a 20% increase in hate crimes against Muslims from 2015 to 2016, appearing to confirm suspicions that the presidential election sparked anti-Muslim sentiment (in fact, the report reveals that there were increases in most categories of hate crimes, but none as high as anti-Muslim crimes).”

TRENDING: These 2 Freeze Frames Likely Show Why the Jury Acquitted AZ Cop Accused of Murder

However, as the Gatestone Institute points out, there are some underlying truths to these numbers that the main stream media just simply ignores.

Back in 2015, the FBI changed it’s method for the way it classifies hate crimes.

“Before then, ethnicity- or nationality-spurred hate crimes were designated as Hispanic or non-Hispanic. The FBI subsequently revised that classification, breaking down hate crimes into a variety of possible categories. As a result, the most recent data is misleading, making the incidents in which Arabs or Muslims were targeted appear to be more numerous than in previous years,” writes the Gatestone Institute.

Secondly, they make the point that while one hate crime is one too many, there are millions of Muslims within the borders of the United States. With 307 incidents, it’s “hard to argue that the numbers are indicative of a “wave” of hatred sweeping over the nation, either prior to or since the rise of Trump, even if one accepts the assumption that hate crimes are under-reported.”

The Gatestone Institute continues to report that back in 2001 — the year of the 9/11 attacks – hate crimes against Muslims rose to 554. However, just a year later in 2002, it dropped considerably to 171 incidents. That rate would remain around that same level up until 2016, with only just a slight uptick.

Now, that should be good news for any minority: That they live in a land that — while not perfect — is largely welcoming of cultures that are different from the majority. But given the extreme stance of liberal Muslim organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations it’s bad news, because it shows the victimhood they’ve been peddling for years is based on a lie.

While we’re looking at numbers, let’s take a look at one more number: 684.

That’s the number of hate crime incidents reported against Jews in the U.S. That’s more than double the number against Muslims.

RELATED: Actress Cried as Man “Simulated Rape” During Audition for Ashley Judd Film

I don’t hear the mainstream media saying that we are an anti-Semitic nation.

The myth of the Islamophobic backlash against Muslims, is just that: A myth. It’s a liberal narrative that is being shoved down our throats and one that too many Americans believe.

But these numbers tell the real story.

H/T Jihad Watch

Please like and share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about this myth.

What do you think about these latest stats? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

Pro-Trump students booted from ‘safe space’ coffee shop

How safe are “safe spaces” on campus? At Fordham University, some “safe spaces” are safer than others – at least, for some people.


In fact, in a campus run coffee shop, there are no safe spaces for those who disagree politically with the majority. Several pro-Trump students found that out the hard way when they were summarily ordered to leave because they were wearing MAGA hats.



The surreal nature of this video cannot be overstated.



New York Post:


It was absolutely insane,” Fordham junior Aaron Spring, 20, told The Post of the Thursday incident. “We weren’t even talking politics — we were talking about finals.”


A video of the encounter appeared Friday on the conservative CampusReform website.


Students wearing Trump’s trademark MAGA ball caps were accosted by a student worker at Rodrigue’s Coffee House, which is run by volunteers and is organized as a club.


“Get out! Five minutes,” the worker barked. “I’m protecting our customers … you are wearing hats that completely violate safe space policy. You have to go. ”


She exploded when Michael Esposito, 19, asked her to explain.


“Fascism, Nazis!” shouted the snowflake. “You have three minutes.”


“I do not see fascism, Nazis on this hat,” Esposito answered. “I see America.”


“It was humiliating to be called a Nazi in front of so many people I go to school with,” Esposito told The Post. “It’s almost scary.”


The students said they were not seeking trouble.


“It’s not like we’re here reading off a manifesto,” said Sebastian Balasov, 21..


The cafe has a lengthy set of “safer space” rules. including “Do not make assumptions about someone’s gender, sexuality, race, class, or experiences” and “No racism – No sexism – No homophobia.”


The rules do not mention headgear.


“They try to say that all are welcome,” Spring said. “But if you talk about diversity, that has to include diversity of thought and opinion, too.”


The ignorance of the snowflakes is absolutely appalling. “Because, fascism…” is not a response to the legitimate question asked. In fact, the answer is the rules are anything we feel like making them and since we disagree with you politically, we will exercise our abitrary power to kick you out.


This is not about “safe spaces” or “diversity” or even “anti-fascism.” This is about the raw exercise of power. No explanation is needed and none will be given. 


This was one student worker, exercising her authority in a petty, vindictive manner and using the excuse of “safe spaces” to cover her meglomania. No doubt  many other patrons silently agreed with the young woman and approved of her actions.


It costs nearly $49,000 in tuition to send a kid to Fordham. The Trump supporting students certainly got an education in that cofffee shop.


 


How safe are “safe spaces” on campus? At Fordham University, some “safe spaces” are safer than others – at least, for some people.


In fact, in a campus run coffee shop, there are no safe spaces for those who disagree politically with the majority. Several pro-Trump students found that out the hard way when they were summarily ordered to leave because they were wearing MAGA hats.


The surreal nature of this video cannot be overstated.



New York Post:


It was absolutely insane,” Fordham junior Aaron Spring, 20, told The Post of the Thursday incident. “We weren’t even talking politics — we were talking about finals.”


A video of the encounter appeared Friday on the conservative CampusReform website.


Students wearing Trump’s trademark MAGA ball caps were accosted by a student worker at Rodrigue’s Coffee House, which is run by volunteers and is organized as a club.


“Get out! Five minutes,” the worker barked. “I’m protecting our customers … you are wearing hats that completely violate safe space policy. You have to go. ”


She exploded when Michael Esposito, 19, asked her to explain.


“Fascism, Nazis!” shouted the snowflake. “You have three minutes.”


“I do not see fascism, Nazis on this hat,” Esposito answered. “I see America.”


“It was humiliating to be called a Nazi in front of so many people I go to school with,” Esposito told The Post. “It’s almost scary.”


The students said they were not seeking trouble.


“It’s not like we’re here reading off a manifesto,” said Sebastian Balasov, 21..


The cafe has a lengthy set of “safer space” rules. including “Do not make assumptions about someone’s gender, sexuality, race, class, or experiences” and “No racism – No sexism – No homophobia.”


The rules do not mention headgear.


“They try to say that all are welcome,” Spring said. “But if you talk about diversity, that has to include diversity of thought and opinion, too.”


The ignorance of the snowflakes is absolutely appalling. “Because, fascism…” is not a response to the legitimate question asked. In fact, the answer is the rules are anything we feel like making them and since we disagree with you politically, we will exercise our abitrary power to kick you out.


This is not about “safe spaces” or “diversity” or even “anti-fascism.” This is about the raw exercise of power. No explanation is needed and none will be given. 


This was one student worker, exercising her authority in a petty, vindictive manner and using the excuse of “safe spaces” to cover her meglomania. No doubt  many other patrons silently agreed with the young woman and approved of her actions.


It costs nearly $49,000 in tuition to send a kid to Fordham. The Trump supporting students certainly got an education in that cofffee shop.


 






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1c2jbfc

MUSLIMS IN NEW YORK CITY Protest for Slaughter of Jews After Trump Moves US Embassy to Jerusalem (VIDEO)

MUSLIMS IN NEW YORK CITY Protest for Slaughter of Jews After Trump Moves US Embassy to Jerusalem (VIDEO)

Muslims in New York City Protest for Slaughter of Jews After Trump Moves Embassy to Jerusalem

This is a very disturbing video.

The protest was held Friday night in New York City.
The Muslims threatened Jews with the Khaybar slaughter of Jews from the holy Koran.

This protest was called after President Trump declared Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and announced US embassy move to Jerusalem.

Muslims called for violence against Jews at the massive New York City protest.

Via Reservists on Duty:

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Wall Supporters, Left-Wing Activists Clash at Border Rally

Wall Supporters, Left-Wing Activists Clash at Border Rally



Clashes broke out at a rally held Saturday on Saturday supporting President Donald Trump’s border wall in Otay Mesa, California, as left-wing counter-protesters taunted them and chanted for amnesty for illegal aliens.

According to the local CBS affiliate:

The rumble ensued when a small group of counter-protestors started a chant from the rear of the gathering, apparently yelling “Racists go home!”

A group of wall supporters equal in size carrying flags moved in quickly and engaged in a shouting match with the other side as deputies and police stood by. What began as face-to-face shouting and chest bumping escalated, and seconds after the first shove by a counter-protester the first punch was thrown by a wall supporter.

That fight spawned several others, and in every direction, small huddles of people were kicking up dust — some trying to pull foes off of grounded and outnumbered friends, others turning flags upside down and taking their best shot at opponents’ heads and bodies.

There were no injuries and no arrests.

Videos circulated on social media depicting the clashes (content warning).

Some activists supporting the wall drove from as far away as Arizona to attend:

Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) was on hand to support the border wall activists (videos courtesy Arthur Christopher Schaper via YouTube):

“Angel Moms,” who have lost relatives to homicides by illegal aliens, also spoke at the rally:


The San Diego Union-Tribune interviewed counter-demonstrators:

The border wall is a “xenophobic act, reminiscent of Nazi Germany,” said Rafael Bautista, 33, of southeast San Diego. Bautista, who helped organize the protest but isn’t affiliated with a single group, said he migrated to the U.S. from Mexico at the age of 4 and has family on both sides of the border.

“They want to put up walls between two shades of color,” he said. “This is exactly the opposite of what we want in this country.”

Groups sponsoring the rally included “San Diegans for Secure Borders, Unite America First, Frontline America, San Diego Patriots, Latinos for Trump, Make America Great PAC and other pro-border wall groups,” according to the local CBS affiliate.

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He was named one of the “most influential” people in news media in 2016. He is the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

REVEALED: Meet #NeverTrumper Evan McMullin’s Secret Silicon Valley Donor

REVEALED: Meet #NeverTrumper Evan McMullin’s Secret Silicon Valley Donor

Failed presidential candidate and staunch #NeverTrumper Evan McMullin is backed by a secretive group of ‘Silicon Sultans.’ The former CIA agent is pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into the Alabama Senate Race with the hope of taking down Republican Judge Roy Moore. 

Daily Caller reports:

McMullin’s recently founded non-profit organization, Stand Up Republic, jumped into the Alabama Senate race this week with a $500,000 ad buy against Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore. […]

One of McMullin’s large Silicon Valley donors is billionaire eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, who funded an anti-Trump super PAC during the presidential campaign.

Omidyar announced a $250,000 donation to Stand Up Republic in May through his organization, Democracy Fund. […]

Democracy Fund said the donation to Stand Up Republic was to support the group in “confronting and engaging in important work to protect the norms of our democracy and to push back against dangerous demagoguery in our politics.” […]

The identities of McMullin’s other “larger donors from Silicon Valley” remain a secret and he intends to keep it that way.

Stand Up Republic is “confronting and engaging in important work to protect the norms of our democracy and to push back against dangerous demagoguery in our politics,” claims Democracy Fund.

Following the 2016 presidential election, McMullin said “Donald Trump is not a loyal American and we should prepare for the next four years accordingly.”

The #NeverTrump isn’t playing with a full deck.

As Peter Hasson of the Daily Caller points out, many of McMullin voters regret supporting him.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Haley Repeatedly Warns North Korea Will Be ‘Utterly Destroyed’ If It Attacks U.S. or Allies

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley warned on Sunday that North Korea will be "utterly destroyed" if it attacks the United States or its allies.

"Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace asked Haley about her tough talk on North Korea and why the Trump administration should take that approach.

"Just the other day you said if there’s war, that North Korea, the regime there will be utterly destroyed," Wallace said. "Why such tough talk?"

"It’s the truth. I mean the reality is if North Korea even attempts to try and threaten the United States or any one of our allies, they will be utterly destroyed," Haley said. "Diplomacy is great in some respects, but you have to also be honest and this was something that North Korea needed to hear and the international community needed to hear."

Haley said that the situation is where it currently is because of North Korea’s provocations and refusal to rid itself of its nuclear program.

"North Korea has pushed the envelope to an extreme level. The United States isn’t going to put up with it and the international community has also rallied around saying North Korea has to denuclearize," Haley said. "But that’s just the honest facts. If North Korea attempts to threaten or do anything to destabilize us or our allies, we absolutely will utterly destroy them."

The post Haley Repeatedly Warns North Korea Will Be ‘Utterly Destroyed’ If It Attacks U.S. or Allies appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Democratic Rep Dodges Question on Racially Insensitive Alabama Mailer Before Admitting It Was a ‘Mistake’

Democratic Rep. Terri Sewell (Ala.) dodged a question Sunday on whether she believed the racially insensitive mailer released by Alabama Democratic Senate candidate Doug Jones’ campaign was wrong, but then later admitted that it was a mistake.

ABC’s "This Week" host Martha Raddatz said she wanted to get Sewell’s reaction on the mailer, citing a local African American voter who told a local news outlet that he would not be voting in Alabama’s special election because it was a "complete slap in the face."

"Think if a black man went after high school girls anyone would try to make him a Senator?" the mailer read.

Vice News reporter Alexandra Jaffe posted a picture of the mailer on Twitter.

"Well, listen. Mailers don’t vote. It’s people who vote and I really believe the folks of Alabama will see through all of this nonsense about Roy Moore," Sewell said.

"Was that mailer a mistake? Do you think that was a mistake? I know people vote and mailers don’t, but was it a mistake?" Raddatz asked.

"Yeah. It was," Sewell said.

Sewell talked about how the voters weren’t looking at just one piece of campaign literature, but would be assessing what Jones’ Republican opponent Roy Moore was saying about why he is the right candidate. Moore has been endorsed by President Donald Trump but faces multiple past allegations of sexual misconduct with teenaged girls, which he denies.

The Root, an online magazine dedicated to black culture, published a piece on Thursday entitled, "A Racist Flyer Might Cost Doug Jones the Election Because the Entire Democratic Party Is Trash."

"Someone, probably a white man, thought that the image would resonate with black people and motivate them to get out the vote. It’s as if black people were considering voting for the child molester until some brilliant strategist posited, "What if he were black, though?" the article said.

The special election will be held on Dec. 12.

The post Democratic Rep Dodges Question on Racially Insensitive Alabama Mailer Before Admitting It Was a ‘Mistake’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

Trump Brings Down the House With Reagan-Style Declaration About God

President Donald Trump has been compared to former President Ronald Reagan on several key issues, but what Trump said on Friday night really had supporters fired up.

During a campaign-style rally in Pensacola, Florida, Trump brought down the house with a Reagan-esque declaration about God and big government.

In his speech, Trump said “protecting religious liberty” has been a top priority for his administration, adding that “getting rid of the Johnson amendment” will be another big step forward.

As noted by The New York Times, the Johnson amendment is a decades-old provision in the U.S. tax code prohibiting non-profit institutions including churches from making political statements and endorsements.

The amendment is repealed in the current version of the GOP tax reform plan.

TRENDING: 25-Year FBI Vet: “Corrupt” Officials Used Trump Dossier to Justify Wire Taps

Trump then launched into a portion of his speech that attracted a huge applause and reaction from the audience.

“We have stopped the government attacks on our Judeo-Christian values,” Trump said, “because we know that families and churches, not government officials, know best how to create a strong and loving community.”

He continued: “And above all else, we know this, America doesn’t worship government, we worship God.”

Trump’s comments drew such a loud response from the crowd that he literally couldn’t talk until the noise had subsided.

Check out a portion of his speech below. The key line comes about the 55-second mark.

Trump’s bold comments on God being greater than the liberal idea of worshipping the government is eerily similar to statements made by Reagan decades ago.

On Jan. 20, 1981, Reagan’s first inaugural address took dead aim at eviscerating the notion of big government.

RELATED: Nobody Realized Trump Made Jerusalem Decision Exactly 1 Year After Obama Gave Holy Sites to Islam

“In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem,” Reagan said, summing up in one sentence the conservative ideas that got him elected.

During another speech, on Aug. 23, 1984, to the Dallas Ecumenical Prayer Breakfast, Reagan spoke about the importance of the United States remaining committed to the word of God.

“Without God, there is no virtue, because there’s no prompting of the conscience … And without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure. If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under,” he said.

While former President Barack Obama thought it was important to talk about rising sea levels and allowing men to use women’s restrooms, real leaders like Trump and Reagan have energized the country by speaking about the importance of faith and families over government intrusion.

As Reagan did during his presidency, Trump has made it clear that he will promote faith, reduce government, and fight for Christians in America.

Unlike Obama, Trump has made it clear that he will stand up for Christians and celebrate God.

H/T The Daily Caller

Please like and share this story if you agree with Trump that Americans should be worshipping God and not government!

What do you think about the similarities between Trump and Reagan? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

25-Year FBI Vet: “Corrupt” Officials Used Trump Dossier to Justify Wire Taps

While many Americans have long doubted claims from Democrats who said President Donald Trump lied about being wiretapped by former President Barack Obama, a new report may prove Trump was right.

Trump tweeted in March that he believed the Obama administration ordered the wiretapping of Trump Tower during the 2016 presidential election.

During FBI Director Christopher Wray’s testimony Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee, he had a notable exchange with Florida Republican Rep. Ron DeSantis that may have contained a major revelation.

DeSantis asked Wray if the discredited Trump-Russia dossier — which was partly funded by failed Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee — was used as the basis for obtaining a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to spy on Trump and members of this campaign.

Wray refused to answer.

TRENDING: More Countries Follow Trump’s Lead in Declaring Jerusalem to be Israel’s Capital

During Wray’s testimony, conservative author and colulmnist Paul Sperry sent out a bombshell tweet.

Sperry wrote that a 25-year veteran of the FBI told him that the dossier was used in the FISA application by pro-Clinton FBI Agent Peter Strzok to spy on Trump.

“(J)ust got this from 25yr vet of FBI who spent 10 years in CI,” wrote Sperry, using the initials “CI” for “counterintelligence”:

“Steele’s dossier was used as predication for that FISA and submitted by that p*** Strzok. I pray there are strong consequences. The entire hierarchy was corrupted.”

The explosive report follows news that more top members of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team have been exposed for an anti-Trump, pro-Clinton bias.

On Thursday, it was reported that a top Justice Department official had been demoted after it was revealed that he had been in contact with Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that compiled the dossier.

According to Fox, then-Deputy Attorney General Bruce G. Ohr, met with Christopher Steele, the former British spy who compiled the dossier, after the 2016 presidential election.

On Tuesday, Andrew Weissman, a top prosecutor currently serving as a deputy to Mueller, praised former acting Attorney General Sally Yates after she was fired in January by Trump for refusing carry out Trump’s orders on the travel ban.

RELATED: Day Before Trump Issued Pro-Israeli Statement, Obama Compared Him to Hitler

In a Jan. 30 email obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch through a federal lawsuit, Weissmann wrote to Yates from his Justice Department account applauding her for defying Trump’s orders.

It was reported on Monday that Mueller fired Strzok, a former top counterintelligence analyst at the FBI, over the summer for sending text messages mocking Trump to an FBI lawyer with whom he was having an affair.

Strzok also played a major role in the investigation into Clinton’s email scandal, where Mueller’s “pit bull” changed former FBI Director James Comey’s statement that described Clinton’s actions as “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless,” shielding her from criminal charges.

Three top officials have now been exposed for leading a politically driven investigation against Trump.

If top FBI and DOJ officials — who either served or still currently serve on Mueller’s team — used the discredited dossier to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump, we could be talking about a major political scandal.

And Sperry’s report that a former FBI veteran said that the Steele dossier was used by Strzok to obtain the FISA warrant to spy on Trump definitely points in that direction.

Please like and share this story on Facebook and Twitter to spread the word that a discredited dossier might have been used as a basis for obtaining a warrant to spy on Donald Trump!

What do you think about this bombshell revelation? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

WAPO Reporter Apologizes to Trump After FAKE NEWS Tweet on Crowd Size

The Washington Post‘s Dave Weigel was busted when his tweet of a nearly empty arena that he claimed was the crowd at President Trump’s rally in Pensacola, Florida on Friday got called out as bullshit by the president himself.

Weigel owned up to his dishonesty, deleted his tweet and apologized:

But he wasn’t going to get off the hook so easily because the POTUS having been the subject of multiple fake news stories this week including CNN’s nothing-whopper with cheese reporting an email giving advance notice to WikiLeaks materials to Donald Trump Jr. which was debunked when it was reported that the crackerjack staff at CNN had the wrong date on the email.

Trump called for Weigel’s firing:

The WAPO will never fire a fake news “reporter” because that is their top product, just as CNN is not holding anyone accountable for their Friday fiasco.

Weigel played it off by saying that the tweet was from his own personal account and not an official Washington Post story and maybe that is true but it exposes the exact type of biased liberal hacks that the paper employs.

Meanwhile, other fake newsers flew to Weigel’s rescue:

No Mr. Griffin, it is not a public threat to the First Amendment, the Constitution only applies to a free press, not propaganda.

Trump wins again!

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com