WATCH: Students With MAGA Hats EVICTED From ‘Safe Space’ Coffee Shop At Fordham U

A group of students wearing “Make America Great Again” hats were booted from a non-profit coffee shop on the Fordham University campus because the cafe is considered a “safe space,” and the hats were triggering customers and staff.

In a shocking video obtained by Campus Reform, a student worker at “Rodrigue’s Coffee House,” harasses and berates the group, screaming that the students were ““Fascism, Nazis!” and they have “three minutes” to vacate the premises.

WATCH:

“You are threatening the integrity of our club. This is a community standard—you are wearing hats that completely violate safe space policy,” the woman – the coffee shop manager – says in the video. “You have to take it off or you have to go.”

When the students take their time, the woman becomes agitated, eventually screaming “Get out! Five minutes.”

When a student asks her to explain, she continues to shout. “Fascism, Nazis! You have three minutes.”

“I do not see fascism, Nazis on this hat,” one of the hat-wearing students answers. “I see America.”

In a later interview with the New York Post, the MAGA-hat wearing group says they weren’t “reading off a manifesto” or even talking politics. They were sitting in the coffee house discussing their respective study strategies for finals week.

According to Campus Reform, the coffee house is actually an extra-curricular “club,” and is staffed by a group of volunteers, and it’s ideological leanings are well known. There are also rules for patronizing the coffee shop. Among them, “Do not make assumptions about someone’s gender, sexuality, race, class, or experiences” and “No racism – No sexism – No homophobia.”

They claim to be an open space on their Facebook page, and a review of their services indicates that Rodrigue’s “is the only on-campus club that provides a daily, tangible service to all members of the Fordham community through low-priced, organic and Fair-Trade coffee drinks as well as an open community space.”

But their commitment to diversity apparently extends only so far.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2wzeEU9

Twitter Rips ‘Bully’ Chelsea Handler For Mocking White House Spokesman Sarah Sanders’ Looks In Video

When unfunny comedian Chelsea Handler announced in October that she was leaving her unfunny show on Netflix, she said she wanted to “devote as much time as I can to becoming a more knowledgeable and engaged citizen and to focus on projects that have significance to me.”

Apparently, she’s decided that she can “participate in a more meaningful way” by shaming other women for their appearances and their weight.

Handler posted a video on Twitter that shows an actress pretending to be White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders giving tips on how to apply makeup. The four-minute video contains hilarious lines like this: “Right now my skin is dry, just like Puerto Rico before that one rainy day!”

“Put it on like gravy. My face is a big fat biscuit!” says the Sanders impersonator with a heavy southern drawl. And: “She’s only 35? I get it. I’ve got my dad’s old face. I’d be shocked as sh*t too….”

Viewers on Twitter didn’t find the stupid video funny.

To which Handler replied:

But many others ripped into Handler for being a “bully” and targeting a women’s appearance and weight.

And on and on they go (hit Twitter and read all the comments — so many of which we can’t publish on a family website).

Handler has targeted Sanders’ looks before, saying on her low-rated TV show: “That harlot that they are dressing up and trolloping out every day? I mean, one day she has no makeup on at all, the next she’s got like 6-foot long eyelashes, and she’s got cleavage, and summer whore lipstick all over her face. Can you believe what they’ve turned her into? A proper trollop.”

Ah, participating in the political process “in a more meaningful way.” Such a noble Hollywood cause.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2wzeEU9

*Ugh* Alabama GOP Senator Joins with Democrats – Tells CNN He Did Not Vote for Roy Moore (VIDEO)

With Friends like the Senator Shelby Who Needs Enemies?

Senator Richard Shelby went on CNN on Sunday morning to announce he did not vote for Judge Roy Moore in the Alabama senate special election.

Shelby made these comments 40 hours before the special election.

Shelby wants the ultra-left Democrat Doug Jones to win in Alabama.

This is how Republican elites think. They would rather turn over the country to liberal elites and their 100 years of failed policy than vote for an embattled Republican.

On Friday Moore accuser Beverly Nelson admitted on national television that she tampered with Roy Moore’s signature in her yearbook.

This didn’t stop Senator Shelby from piling on Judge Moore.

Senator Richard Shelby: “I want to reiterate again: I didn’t vote for Roy Moore, I wouldn’t vote for Roy Moore, I think the Republican Party can do better,

It’s not clear who many of these Republicans think they represent?

Shelby went on with Jake Tapper on Sunday.

The post *Ugh* Alabama GOP Senator Joins with Democrats – Tells CNN He Did Not Vote for Roy Moore (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

VIDEO => ANTIFA BEATS HEADS At Kate Steinle Memorial March in Portland

VIDEO => ANTIFA BEATS HEADS At Kate Steinle Memorial March in Portland

Portland, Oregon based Patriot Prayer attempted to hold a rally and march in honor of Kate Steinle on Saturday.

And of course Antifa Communists just had to show up to cause trouble.

Patriot Prayer is led by Joey Gibson, and generally regarded as the area’s main collection of Trump supporters. Two brawls break out and antifa basically get their butts handed to them as they try to pick fights.

Note the guy in the blue Navy hoodie, single handedly taking on about 8 antifa agitators. Also note the police rush in to break it up after about 30 seconds, when it’s clear the Trump people are winning.

Controversial Portland Police Sergeant Chadd Stensgaard can be seen berating the man known as “Tiny”, the giant pro Trump Samoan dude. Something about “stay on your side of the street,” as Tiny tries to wash pepper spray out of his eyes. Tiny was subsequently arrested for this, booked on Disorderly Conduct, Harassment, and Assault IV charges. He was the only one arrested. So, in the People’s Republic Of Portland, it’s perfectly alright for the violent antifa to come over onto the supposedly designated Trump side of the street and start fights, but a Trump supporter can’t go over to the supposedly “antifa” side of the street.

You can see well known communist agitator Luis Marquez berating Joey Gibson and Portland Police.  It’s evident that the Portland Police were there to protect Marquez and his band of masked commies.

Big city police prove, once again, that there are two sets of laws; One set of laws that allow the communists to get away with whatever they want to do, and another set of laws that non communists get arrested on, even though their actions are equal to, if not less criminal-ish, than what the communists are doing. At some point, the “right wing” folks in big cities will come to realize that the police are not there to protect the public or to protect anyone’s rights. They are there to collect a paycheck, the paycheck comes from the city, and the city, run by extreme leftists, tells them to protect the communists and arrest anyone who stands up against the leftist violence.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

NFL HELL: Ticket Prices Fall To $10 As Teams Struggle To Fill Stadiums

The NFL protests have been lucrative for social justice charities — they’ll receive a whopping $89 million in “settlement” money, redirected from veterans and breast cancer charity funds — but they’re also becoming a boon for cash-strapped football fans.

It turns out, if you can still stomach a professional football game, you can now get tickets for about the same price as a couple of Starbucks lattes.

According to Vivid Seats, an NFL ticket reselling site, seat prices at most NFL stadiums have bottomed out, leaving fans able to snag a lower level seat for a Buffalo Bills game for an astounding three dollars. Tickets at center field, right on the fifty-yard line (typically hard to find), will run you around $30.

Shockingly, those prices are down more than a third from when IJR.com checked the stats.

Obviously, seats for the Bills (who are 6-6) and the Colts (who are even worse), aren’t among the most in-demand tickets in the NFL. But even big-name teams aren’t faring much better. Tickets to see the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field are going for around $20. Tickets to see the Green Bay Packers start at around $10.

Not all teams are in the bargain basement, but tickets are available for nearly every NFL franchise at deeply discounted prices. The Pittsburgh Steelers have some of the nation’s most rabid fans. But snagging a seat at Heinz field will run you only around $65. In previous seasons, Steelers tickets could cost as much as $250 per game — when you could get them.

Things are getting so desperate, reportedly, that some NFL broadcasts are hiring extras to pose as fans. The listing is unconfirmed, but one Philadelphia newspaper claims that FOX advertised for “actors, models, and talent” to work Sunday’s game between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Los Angeles Chargers.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2wzeEU9

Anti-Semitic Book Fills Bookshelves This Christmas, Written for Toddlers

A common misconception is that the conflict between Palestine and Israel has been going on for thousands of years. However, a quick look at history will tell you the truth. The first historical mention of Israel outside of the Bible is from an Egyptian inscription from 1208 B.C.

That’s 3,225 years ago. In contrast, “Palestine” only officially became a nation in 1988. This means Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” album is older than the state of Palestine.

However untrue this misconception is, it doesn’t stop liberals from saying that Palestine’s rightful territory was ripped away by Americans and Israelis.

This anger seeps over into teaching material for children, with one of the newest iterations being “P Is for Palestine” by Golbarg Bashi, a self-professed “feminist professor of Iranian studies,” which is similar to being a vegan who wants to be an expert on steak.

Several of the entries are enough to make anger well up, but one in particular is an outright deadly lie:

TRENDING: Ever Wonder What Happens When a Homemade ISIS Tank Meets an Actual Tank?

The Palestinian intifada was a guerrilla movement that sought to weaken Israeli control by attacks, protests, and destruction of Jewish-held property. The first and second intifadas were deadly affairs that left thousands dead — mostly Palestinians. Encouraging children to grow up and enact a third one is not something a responsible human being would do.

Nevertheless, the conflict in Israel has been a boon for liberals, giving them an outlet to express casual anti-Semitism under the guise of helping the poor and downtrodden Palestinians. This includes movies, shows, and now, even books for toddlers.

CNN cameras are not often seen when an Israeli cafe, full of normal people going about their day, is destroyed by Hamas rockets. You can be sure to see those cameras rolling when the Israeli Defense Force hunts down the attackers, catching every second of what the Palestinian-favoring mainstream media will later spin as “oppression.”

Hamas, a pro-Palestine terrorist organization, and others like them are often lauded as heroes by liberals in the West, and you can actually spot shirts with the crossed sword logo on mindless college students.

Melbourne Gaza protest Zionist Criminals, End the Palestine Holocaust

The reality of the situation is one that social justice warriors, American apologists, and Democrats simply refuse to accept. Israel has been under attack since its inception.

The Middle East is an Arab world. When Israel was returned as the Jewish homeland, it immediately sparked a war. Whether it was through divine intervention or something else, Israel emerged victorious when it should have fallen to enemies on all sides.

Radicals will use whatever grounds they can to attack what is right and good. Even the United Nations has been turned against Israel, often choosing the AK-47-wielding Arab terrorists over Jewish families trying to get by unharmed. America’s role in Israel security is usually seen on the floor of the U.N. We are almost always the only nation to make a stand for the tiny nation against the rest of the world.

RELATED: Day Before Trump Issued Pro-Israeli Statement, Obama Compared Him to Hitler

This is the difference between doing what is easy and doing what is right.

PFLP-group-1969

Do you think this book is harmful to future generations?

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

Memo to John Lewis: Democrats are the party of white racism


President Trump’s attendance and his hurtful policies are an insult to the people portrayed in this civil rights museum. The struggles represented in this museum exemplify the truth of what really happened in Mississippi.


What really happened in Mississippi and throughout the South is that Democrats, who never got over losing the Civil War, sought to move blacks to a new plantation of oppression and suppression.  As one wag put it, the reason Democrats hate Republicans so much is that the Republicans took away their slaves.  All the Democrats have succeeded in doing is moving blacks to the urban plantations of inner cities like Baltimore, Detroit, and Chicago, all run by Democrats, where black children are preyed upon by black gangs, are trapped in failing schools, and have little or no job opportunities.


It is hard to fathom what Rep. Lewis means by “hurtful policies.”  Does he mean trying to rid the inner cities of gangs like MS-1; supporting school choice; fighting illegal immigration, which increases competition for entry level jobs; or just generally promoting economic growth, the rising tide President John F. Kennedy said lifts all our boats?


One would have thought the eight-year presidency of the first black president, Barack Obama, was an era of progress for blacks, but it decidedly was not:


[T]he seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black Americans across the board has slipped from 63.2 percent to 61.7 percent – down 2.4 percent.


The seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black teenagers also sagged from 29.6 percent to 28.8 percent – down 2.7 percent.


During Obama’s tenure, the percentage of black Americans struggling below the poverty line has advanced, according to the most recent Census Bureau data, from 25.8 in 2009 to 26.2 in 2014 – up 1.6 percent.


Real median income among black households during those years, according to the Census Bureau, sank from $35,954 to $35,398 – down 1.5 percent.


The number of black food-stamp participants exploded across that time frame from 7,393,000 to 11,699,000, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reports – up 58.2 percent.


Also, from Obama’s oath of office through the fourth quarter of 2015, the percentage of black Americans who own homes foundered from 46.1 percent to 41.9 percent, according to the Census – down 9.1 percent.


One can search in vain for John Lewis and his liberal brethren saying anything about Barack Obama’s “hurtful policies.”  Obama, like most liberal Democrats, blames the plight of blacks on racism when in fact the impediments to black progress are to be found in fatherless homes, out-of-wedlock births, gang crime, failing public schools, and cities run by Democratic socialists who blame racism but not their opportunity-killing policies.


John Lewis’s historical amnesia omits, for example, the fact that it was not a Republican, but the honored and celebrated Senator Robert Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia and former “Grand Kleagle” with the Ku Klux Klan, who holds the distinction of being the only senator to have opposed the only two black nominees to the Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, and led a 52-day filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.



Sen. Al Gore, father of the former vice president, voted against the act, as did Sen. J. William Fulbright, to whom Bill Clinton dedicated a memorial; former South Carolina senator Ernest Hollings; Sen. Richard Russell; and, of course, Sen. Strom Thurmond, who was a Democrat at that time.


John Lewis forgets that it was Democrats who unleashed the dogs and turned on the fire hoses on civil rights marchers.  It was Democrats who stood in the schoolhouse door and are still standing there by opposing school choice and trapping minority children in failing schools.  It was Democrats who blocked the bridge in Selma.


The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would never have been possible without Republican leadership.  Not only was that legislation a personal victory for Illinois Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen, then Senate minority leader, but Republicans in both the House and Senate supported the measure in far greater percentages than Democrats.  Only six GOP senators voted against the act, compared with 21 Democrats.  The party of Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump beat back the fire hoses and dogs of the party of Robert Byrd and John Lewis.



As one pundit put it, the Democrats should know a lot about Jim Crow laws, since Democrats wrote them.  Condoleezza Rice, President George W. Bush’s national security adviser, explained at the 2000 GOP national convention why a black college professor would be a Republican:


The first Republican I knew was my father John Rice. And he is still the Republican I admire the most. My father joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. I want you to know that my father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I.


Neither should we.  Lewis’s colleague in the Senate, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) badgered Attorney General Jeff Sessions about the awards he received from various groups whose founders or leaders have made politically incorrect statements Blumenthal found offensive.  Neither Blumenthal nor Lewis has any problem with Hillary Clinton, their 2016 presidential candidate, accepting the Margaret Sanger Award.


Back in March of 2009, Hillary Clinton accepted Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award, doled out by an organization originally called the American Birth Control League.  In accepting the award, the Weekly Standard noted, Hillary had high praise for the noted eugenicist:


Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision[.] … And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.


As J. Kenneth Blackwell, writing in the Washington Times, notes, those who chant “black lives matter” obviously exclude the abortion rate of black babies that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger and the KKK could only dream of:


138,539 black babies, nearly one baby in three, were killed in the womb in 2010. According to the CDC, between 2007 and 2010, innocent black babies were victimized in nearly 36 percent of the abortion deaths in the United States, though blacks represent only 12.8 percent of the population. Some say the abortion capital of America is New York City. According to LifeSiteNews, the city’s Department of Health reported that in 2012, more black babies were aborted (31,328) than born (24,758). That’s 55.9 percent of black babies killed before birth. Blacks represented 42.4 percent of all abortions.


This is a disturbing and tragic situation that continues unabated and is the fulfillment of the dream of Hillary Clinton’s heroine, Margaret Sanger.  As Blackwell also noted:


According to Sanger, “Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated.” She opened her first abortion clinics in inner cities, and it’s no accident that even today, “79 percent of Planned Parenthood’s abortion facilities are located in black or minority neighborhoods.”


Rep. Chris Smith reminded Hillary Clinton of the nature of Sanger’s belief that eugenics, something the Nazis would put into horrifying practice, was Margaret Sanger’s solution to all our problems, particularly racial ones.  As LifeSite News reported at the time:


Addressing Mrs. Clinton, Smith said, “Are you kidding? In ‘awe” of Margaret Sanger, who said in 1921, ‘Eugenics … is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems’. And who also said in 1922, ‘The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it’?” …


Highlighting the racist nature of eugenics, Smith further quoted Sanger, who said in 1939,  “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities[.] … We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”


When Jeff Sessions was being crucified for his alleged racist past, Sen Ted. Cruz pointed out that Democrats had better look in the mirror of history:


The day after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was rebuked while making a speech critical of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Sen. Ted Cruz blasted Democrats, saying their party is the one rooted in racism.


“The Democrats are the party of the Ku Klux Klan,” Cruz (R-Tex.) said in an interview on Fox News on Wednesday. “You look at the most racist – you look at the Dixiecrats, they were Democrats who imposed segregation, imposed Jim Crow laws, who founded the Klan. The Klan was founded by a great many Democrats.”


Cruz is right.  John Lewis is wrong.  Under President Trump, black Americans are finding work in greater numbers and are increasingly participating in an economy freed from oppressive taxation and regulation:


The unemployment rate, labor participation rate and overall employment for black Americans appears to be improving under President Donald Trump, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics employment data[.] …


In the president’s first 7 months in office, the unemployment rate for said group dropped from 8.0 in March 2017 to 7.4 in July.


The participation rate for black American workers is up one percent since March 2017, and the number of black Americans with a job is up roughly 700,000.


Black Americans were one of the hardest hit groups during the Great Recession and throughout much of former President Barack Obama’s two-terms in office. The unemployment rate for this group was 13.7 when Obama took office in 2009, reaching a height of 16.8 in March 2010.


As libertarian commentator, investigative reporter, and host on TheBlaze TV Lawrence Jones notes:


Black unemployment is at a 20-year low. Under President Obama, it was double the national average. Black businesses are soaring right now. Food stamps for black folks are decreasing.


John Lewis doesn’t remember the thrilling days of yesteryear, when Democrats stood in the schoolhouse door, wrote Jim Crow laws, and unleashed the dogs, or even the era of Barack Obama, when blacks were a source of votes, treated as victims, while trapped in urban plantations run by Democrats.


Trump asked blacks during the campaign, What do you have to lose?  The answer so far is that they have lost nothing and have gained and will gain much as they are freed to participate in and pursue the American dream.


Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications. 


 


Georgia Democrat Rep. John Lewis refused to attend the opening of the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum because President Trump was there, yet he would have been the first to condemn Trump had Trump not gone.  The irony is that much of the brutality, oppression, and denial of civil rights the museum records was committed by the party of white racism – the Democratic Party.


Reps. John Lewis and Bennie G. Thompson issued a joint statement full of righteous indignation but little truth in explaining their absence from the ceremony:


President Trump’s attendance and his hurtful policies are an insult to the people portrayed in this civil rights museum. The struggles represented in this museum exemplify the truth of what really happened in Mississippi.


What really happened in Mississippi and throughout the South is that Democrats, who never got over losing the Civil War, sought to move blacks to a new plantation of oppression and suppression.  As one wag put it, the reason Democrats hate Republicans so much is that the Republicans took away their slaves.  All the Democrats have succeeded in doing is moving blacks to the urban plantations of inner cities like Baltimore, Detroit, and Chicago, all run by Democrats, where black children are preyed upon by black gangs, are trapped in failing schools, and have little or no job opportunities.


It is hard to fathom what Rep. Lewis means by “hurtful policies.”  Does he mean trying to rid the inner cities of gangs like MS-1; supporting school choice; fighting illegal immigration, which increases competition for entry level jobs; or just generally promoting economic growth, the rising tide President John F. Kennedy said lifts all our boats?


One would have thought the eight-year presidency of the first black president, Barack Obama, was an era of progress for blacks, but it decidedly was not:


[T]he seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black Americans across the board has slipped from 63.2 percent to 61.7 percent – down 2.4 percent.


The seasonally adjusted labor-force-participation rate for black teenagers also sagged from 29.6 percent to 28.8 percent – down 2.7 percent.


During Obama’s tenure, the percentage of black Americans struggling below the poverty line has advanced, according to the most recent Census Bureau data, from 25.8 in 2009 to 26.2 in 2014 – up 1.6 percent.


Real median income among black households during those years, according to the Census Bureau, sank from $35,954 to $35,398 – down 1.5 percent.


The number of black food-stamp participants exploded across that time frame from 7,393,000 to 11,699,000, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reports – up 58.2 percent.


Also, from Obama’s oath of office through the fourth quarter of 2015, the percentage of black Americans who own homes foundered from 46.1 percent to 41.9 percent, according to the Census – down 9.1 percent.


One can search in vain for John Lewis and his liberal brethren saying anything about Barack Obama’s “hurtful policies.”  Obama, like most liberal Democrats, blames the plight of blacks on racism when in fact the impediments to black progress are to be found in fatherless homes, out-of-wedlock births, gang crime, failing public schools, and cities run by Democratic socialists who blame racism but not their opportunity-killing policies.


John Lewis’s historical amnesia omits, for example, the fact that it was not a Republican, but the honored and celebrated Senator Robert Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia and former “Grand Kleagle” with the Ku Klux Klan, who holds the distinction of being the only senator to have opposed the only two black nominees to the Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas, and led a 52-day filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.



Sen. Al Gore, father of the former vice president, voted against the act, as did Sen. J. William Fulbright, to whom Bill Clinton dedicated a memorial; former South Carolina senator Ernest Hollings; Sen. Richard Russell; and, of course, Sen. Strom Thurmond, who was a Democrat at that time.


John Lewis forgets that it was Democrats who unleashed the dogs and turned on the fire hoses on civil rights marchers.  It was Democrats who stood in the schoolhouse door and are still standing there by opposing school choice and trapping minority children in failing schools.  It was Democrats who blocked the bridge in Selma.


The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would never have been possible without Republican leadership.  Not only was that legislation a personal victory for Illinois Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen, then Senate minority leader, but Republicans in both the House and Senate supported the measure in far greater percentages than Democrats.  Only six GOP senators voted against the act, compared with 21 Democrats.  The party of Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump beat back the fire hoses and dogs of the party of Robert Byrd and John Lewis.



As one pundit put it, the Democrats should know a lot about Jim Crow laws, since Democrats wrote them.  Condoleezza Rice, President George W. Bush’s national security adviser, explained at the 2000 GOP national convention why a black college professor would be a Republican:


The first Republican I knew was my father John Rice. And he is still the Republican I admire the most. My father joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. I want you to know that my father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I.


Neither should we.  Lewis’s colleague in the Senate, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) badgered Attorney General Jeff Sessions about the awards he received from various groups whose founders or leaders have made politically incorrect statements Blumenthal found offensive.  Neither Blumenthal nor Lewis has any problem with Hillary Clinton, their 2016 presidential candidate, accepting the Margaret Sanger Award.


Back in March of 2009, Hillary Clinton accepted Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award, doled out by an organization originally called the American Birth Control League.  In accepting the award, the Weekly Standard noted, Hillary had high praise for the noted eugenicist:


Now, I have to tell you that it was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision[.] … And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.


As J. Kenneth Blackwell, writing in the Washington Times, notes, those who chant “black lives matter” obviously exclude the abortion rate of black babies that Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger and the KKK could only dream of:


138,539 black babies, nearly one baby in three, were killed in the womb in 2010. According to the CDC, between 2007 and 2010, innocent black babies were victimized in nearly 36 percent of the abortion deaths in the United States, though blacks represent only 12.8 percent of the population. Some say the abortion capital of America is New York City. According to LifeSiteNews, the city’s Department of Health reported that in 2012, more black babies were aborted (31,328) than born (24,758). That’s 55.9 percent of black babies killed before birth. Blacks represented 42.4 percent of all abortions.


This is a disturbing and tragic situation that continues unabated and is the fulfillment of the dream of Hillary Clinton’s heroine, Margaret Sanger.  As Blackwell also noted:


According to Sanger, “Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated.” She opened her first abortion clinics in inner cities, and it’s no accident that even today, “79 percent of Planned Parenthood’s abortion facilities are located in black or minority neighborhoods.”


Rep. Chris Smith reminded Hillary Clinton of the nature of Sanger’s belief that eugenics, something the Nazis would put into horrifying practice, was Margaret Sanger’s solution to all our problems, particularly racial ones.  As LifeSite News reported at the time:


Addressing Mrs. Clinton, Smith said, “Are you kidding? In ‘awe” of Margaret Sanger, who said in 1921, ‘Eugenics … is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems’. And who also said in 1922, ‘The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it’?” …


Highlighting the racist nature of eugenics, Smith further quoted Sanger, who said in 1939,  “We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities[.] … We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”


When Jeff Sessions was being crucified for his alleged racist past, Sen Ted. Cruz pointed out that Democrats had better look in the mirror of history:


The day after Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was rebuked while making a speech critical of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Sen. Ted Cruz blasted Democrats, saying their party is the one rooted in racism.


“The Democrats are the party of the Ku Klux Klan,” Cruz (R-Tex.) said in an interview on Fox News on Wednesday. “You look at the most racist – you look at the Dixiecrats, they were Democrats who imposed segregation, imposed Jim Crow laws, who founded the Klan. The Klan was founded by a great many Democrats.”


Cruz is right.  John Lewis is wrong.  Under President Trump, black Americans are finding work in greater numbers and are increasingly participating in an economy freed from oppressive taxation and regulation:


The unemployment rate, labor participation rate and overall employment for black Americans appears to be improving under President Donald Trump, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics employment data[.] …


In the president’s first 7 months in office, the unemployment rate for said group dropped from 8.0 in March 2017 to 7.4 in July.


The participation rate for black American workers is up one percent since March 2017, and the number of black Americans with a job is up roughly 700,000.


Black Americans were one of the hardest hit groups during the Great Recession and throughout much of former President Barack Obama’s two-terms in office. The unemployment rate for this group was 13.7 when Obama took office in 2009, reaching a height of 16.8 in March 2010.


As libertarian commentator, investigative reporter, and host on TheBlaze TV Lawrence Jones notes:


Black unemployment is at a 20-year low. Under President Obama, it was double the national average. Black businesses are soaring right now. Food stamps for black folks are decreasing.


John Lewis doesn’t remember the thrilling days of yesteryear, when Democrats stood in the schoolhouse door, wrote Jim Crow laws, and unleashed the dogs, or even the era of Barack Obama, when blacks were a source of votes, treated as victims, while trapped in urban plantations run by Democrats.


Trump asked blacks during the campaign, What do you have to lose?  The answer so far is that they have lost nothing and have gained and will gain much as they are freed to participate in and pursue the American dream.


Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications. 


 






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1c2jbfc

After Trump Scraps Obama’s Military ‘Rules’, Troops Decimate ISIS At A Pace That Even Surprises Commanders

ISIS won’t be able to field a JV team.

Via BPR:

Liberals may not want to admit it, but President Trump is succeeding ‘bigly’ with one of his major campaign promises: crushing ISIS.

By discarding Obama-era rules of engagement and giving the military greater freedom, the Trump administration has decimated ISIS with a speed that’s even surprising commanders on-the-ground.

With less than a year in office, President Trump has overseen massive gains against the Islamic caliphate, with the once-powerful terror state losing city after city.

ISIS once governed immense territory in Iraq and Syria, ruling over 8 million people and controlling profitable refineries, agriculture, smuggling routes, and arsenals.

Now, ISIS controls only 3 percent of Iraq and 5 percent of Syria. Their leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, is in hiding. American forces and regional allies have liberated key cities like Mosul, Raqqa, Tel Afar, and Rawa.

Brig. Gen. Andrew Croft, the ranking U.S. Air Force officer in Iraq, told Fox News he credits the Trump administration with providing the right leadership.

“The leadership team that is in place right now has certainly enabled us to succeed,” Croft said. “I couldn’t ask for a better leadership team to work for, to enable the military to do what it does best.”

Keep reading…

via Weasel Zippers

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2s3tLUa

Report: The State Department still won’t recognize Jerusalem as a place that exists

Despite President Donald Trump’s formal declaration that the United States recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the U.S. will still not recognize Jerusalem on official documents, maps and passports.

Wait, what’s going on?

According to the Washington Free Beacon, for the time being, the State Department still won’t recognize “Jerusalem, Israel” as a place that actually exists.

The State Department last week acknowledged at press conferences that Trump had declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel, but when asked if the U.S. government will officially recognize Jerusalem as a place that exists within Israel, officials refused to acknowledge the holy city.

State Department officials told the Free Beacon the U.S. government, because of Trump’s declaration, “recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and its seat of government.” However, “the specific boundaries of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem are subject to final status negotiations,” the official said.

The position of Jerusalem in Israel is up for debate because of Palestinian-Israeli negotiations and the U.S. government doesn’t want to trample over that, the official said.

“While we are affirming the current and historic reality of Jerusalem’s role as Israel’s capital and seat of government, any ultimate determination of sovereignty over Jerusalem will flow from the results of negotiations between the parties,” he told the Free Beacon.

What is the reaction to the position?

The State Department’s position has already drawn outrage on Capitol Hill, mostly among pro-Israel congressmen.

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) told the Free Beacon the Constitution gives the president the power to make foreign policy, not the State Department. He also slammed the “entrenched bureaucracy.”

“The president is the commander-in-chief and America’s sole organ when it comes to conducting foreign policy. Article II of the Constitution does not vest this authority in bureaucrats in the State Department,” he told the Free Beacon.

“The State Department must permit Americans born in Jerusalem to list ‘Jerusalem, Israel’ on their passports and must follow the logical implications of this historic recognition in other policy areas,” he added. “President Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital was the right thing to do and enjoys broad support from the American people; an entrenched bureaucracy has no right to stymie this decision.”

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.theblaze.com

Is Jeff Sessions being blackmailed?

Let’s begin with some accusations.  They are well founded and as credible as any against Roy Moore – perhaps more so.


The FBI’s first director, J. Edgar Hoover, was reputed to have compiled incriminating dossiers on just about every top office-holder in Washington, D.C., up to and including the presidents, under several of whose tenures Hoover served.  Whenever there was talk of firing him, Hoover reportedly met with the contemporary chief of state and persuaded him to retain him (Hoover) in his post.  Regarding President Kennedy, there was surely a great deal in the dossier, especially as concerned his scandalous relationship with Marilyn Monroe.  Kennedy, who had been rumored to be planning to replace Hoover, quickly changed his mind after one of those meetings.



So much for the accusations.  Let’s talk current events.


Jeff Sessions, as senator, had a long history of being a staunch conservative.  As such, he favors small government, strict accountability, and unwavering obedience to the law.  Prior to his appointment as attorney general of the United States, no one would have thought he would ever refuse to comply with subpoenas issued by the oversight committees of Congress.  Yet, in recent months, he seems uncharacteristically timid in the face of obvious corrupt practices in both the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, both of which are under his authority.  He has shown no aggression in cooperating with congressional inquiries.


What could possibly explain this?


One possibility is that behind the scenes, General Sessions is a ferocious bulldog, rooting out the evidence on his two predecessors who illegally manipulated the law to undermine the Second Amendment (Project Gunrunner) and who conspired to rig the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal (the infamous meeting on the tarmac).  Possibly, Sessions is building an airtight case that will be used to successfully prosecute Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, and her acolytes.  Possibly, one bright morning, we will awaken to the news of several indictments against the criminal enterprise that, but for the unexpected election of President Trump, would have made of our government an entrenched thugocracy.


If so, then yes, I will purchase your title to the Brooklyn Bridge.


Unfortunately, my money is probably safe.  The other possibility is that Jeff Sessions has had that meeting – the one Kennedy had.


Yes, this sounds improbably conspiratorial, and I desperately hope my dark suspicions are the ranting of a fool.  But how else can one explain the seemingly total disinterest in the DoJ of deposing, under oath, the prime suspects in the vast corruption that was the Obama administration?


General Sessions, whatever it is in your background that you fear being exposed, I forgive you in advance.  This is your time to be a profile in courage and do the right thing.


Profiles in Courage.  Who wrote that book?


Let’s begin with some accusations.  They are well founded and as credible as any against Roy Moore – perhaps more so.


The FBI’s first director, J. Edgar Hoover, was reputed to have compiled incriminating dossiers on just about every top office-holder in Washington, D.C., up to and including the presidents, under several of whose tenures Hoover served.  Whenever there was talk of firing him, Hoover reportedly met with the contemporary chief of state and persuaded him to retain him (Hoover) in his post.  Regarding President Kennedy, there was surely a great deal in the dossier, especially as concerned his scandalous relationship with Marilyn Monroe.  Kennedy, who had been rumored to be planning to replace Hoover, quickly changed his mind after one of those meetings.


So much for the accusations.  Let’s talk current events.


Jeff Sessions, as senator, had a long history of being a staunch conservative.  As such, he favors small government, strict accountability, and unwavering obedience to the law.  Prior to his appointment as attorney general of the United States, no one would have thought he would ever refuse to comply with subpoenas issued by the oversight committees of Congress.  Yet, in recent months, he seems uncharacteristically timid in the face of obvious corrupt practices in both the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, both of which are under his authority.  He has shown no aggression in cooperating with congressional inquiries.


What could possibly explain this?


One possibility is that behind the scenes, General Sessions is a ferocious bulldog, rooting out the evidence on his two predecessors who illegally manipulated the law to undermine the Second Amendment (Project Gunrunner) and who conspired to rig the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal (the infamous meeting on the tarmac).  Possibly, Sessions is building an airtight case that will be used to successfully prosecute Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, and her acolytes.  Possibly, one bright morning, we will awaken to the news of several indictments against the criminal enterprise that, but for the unexpected election of President Trump, would have made of our government an entrenched thugocracy.


If so, then yes, I will purchase your title to the Brooklyn Bridge.


Unfortunately, my money is probably safe.  The other possibility is that Jeff Sessions has had that meeting – the one Kennedy had.


Yes, this sounds improbably conspiratorial, and I desperately hope my dark suspicions are the ranting of a fool.  But how else can one explain the seemingly total disinterest in the DoJ of deposing, under oath, the prime suspects in the vast corruption that was the Obama administration?


General Sessions, whatever it is in your background that you fear being exposed, I forgive you in advance.  This is your time to be a profile in courage and do the right thing.


Profiles in Courage.  Who wrote that book?






via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1c2jbfc