Far-Left Crank Dianne Feinstein Admits No Law Could Have Stopped Vegas Shooter (VIDEO)

Far-Left Crank Dianne Feinstein Admits No Law Could Have Stopped Vegas Shooter (VIDEO)

Even far-left crank, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), one of the loudest gun control voices in Congress, admitted that no law could have stopped Stephen Paddock from killing 59 people and injuring over 500.

Feinstein appeared on ‘Face the Nation’ Sunday morning to discuss legislation to ban the sale of bump stocks, which is a gun modification to increase the rate of fire. Stephen Paddock used bump stocks on his firearms during his shooting rampage.

Host John Dickerson asked the Democrat Senator if there could have been any law passed which would have prevented Paddock from carrying out a mass shooting.

“Could there have been any law passed that would’ve stopped him?” Dickerson asked.

“No, he passed background checks registering for handguns and other weapons on multiple occasions,” Feinstein said.

Video:

H/T: The Daily Caller

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Ireland honors dead commie Che Guevara

The postal service in the Republic of Ireland has decided to honor psychopathic mass-murdering communist Ernesto “Che” Guevara with a €1.00 (one euro) postage stamp on the 50th anniversary of his death. The decision was approved by Ireland’s cabinet, which didn’t bother to submit the matter to the Oireachtas, the country’s parliament.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/11sy9G3

SNL Mocked Trump But Ignored Harvey Weinstein

SNL Mocked Trump But Ignored Harvey Weinstein

8 Oct, 2017
8 Oct, 2017

The latest episode of Saturday Night Live saw its regular roast of President Donald Trump, calls for gun control in the wake of the Las Vegas shooting, but not one word was uttered about embattled film mogul Harvey Weinstein’s alleged sexual harassment of multiple women over a period of decades.

Sean Deb, the New York Times’ media reporter, called the lack of Weinstein coverage “curious” because the long-running NBC comedy show “has mocked lesser known figures.”

“As I said before: SNL has mocked lesser known figures. Weinstein is a huge Hollywood mogul. To not even mention in Update was curious,” Deb wrote Sunday.

Weinstein — who stands accused of using his powerful status to take advantage of young actresses, including Ashley Judd and Rose McGowan — has been publicly condemned by several Hollywood stars, has had his political donations to Democratic Party lawmakers donated away, and has become the latest high-profile face of sexual harassment in entertainment since perhaps Bill Cosby.

So, it was expected that SNL would devote a few minutes to the scandal. But it didn’t, and other media personalities noticed.

Katie Krause, producer and host of Entertainment Tonight:

ESPN columnist Buster Olney:

Late-night TV hosts — including Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers, and James Corden — also ignored Thursday the blistering New York Times report alleging Weinstein sexually harassed multiple women over a period of decades.

SNL creator and comedy veteran Lorne Michaels reportedly said he didn’t scorch Weinstein Saturday because the Queens-born Hollywood super-producer is from New York.

“It’s a New York thing,” Michaels reportedly told the Daily Mail at an SNL afterparty.

Saturday’s show, however, guest starred Wonder Woman star Gal Gadot, an emotional Las Vegas tribute musical performance from country star Jason Aldean, and a sketch about O.J. Simpson.

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Will Meryl Streep Condemn Harvey Weinstein Who She Called ‘God’?

Will Meryl Streep Condemn Harvey Weinstein Who She Called ‘God’?

8 Oct, 2017
8 Oct, 2017

Veteran actress Meryl Streep has been silent in the wake of a bombshell New York Times report alleging decades of sexual harassment allegations against the Hollywood titan Harvey Weinstein, who she once called “God.”

Streep and Weinstein have years of history — in her 2012 Golden Globe acceptance speech, the actress thanked “God – Harvey Weinstein.” The pun was met with thunderous applause by the star-studded.

VIDEO

Streep’s silence in the wake of the myriad allegations facing Weinstein has not gone unnoticed.

Best-selling author and conservative commentator Ann Coulter called out Streep for remaining mum over Weinstein, while repeatedly trashing President Trump.

“Merle Streep on Trump: “Evil prospers when good men do nothing” … Like she did for 20 years, winning Oscars,” Coulter tweeted.

But the Academy Award-winning star is one of many actresses who’ve worked with the embattled movie mogul, who’ve said nothing of this high-profile scandal.

Among those A-list leading ladies are, Nicole Kidman, Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett, Anna Paquin, Renee Zelwegger, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Judi Dench, and Penelope Cruz — many of whom have spoken out about domestic abuse and sexual assault in entertainment and other professional spaces.

Kidman, for example, used her acceptance speech at the Emmy’s last month to highlight domestic abuse and violence against women.

To be sure, several actresses have called out Weinstein since the allegations were reported including actresses Amber Tamblyn, Lena Dunham, and Brie Larson

As Streep, and others, remain silent, a steady and almost daily stream of new allegations against Weinstein continue to surface. The mega-producers has denied the allegations against him and has accepted “responsibility” for his past behavior. Weinstein has also threatened to sue the New York Times for what he called “reckless reporting.”

On Sunday, the Weinstein Co. board of directors announced that Weinstein had been terminated, effective immediately, according to the Associated Press.

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Harvey Weinstein Fired From The Weinstein Company

Harvey Weinstein Fired From The Weinstein Company

8 Oct, 2017
8 Oct, 2017

The Weinstein Co. board of directors has terminated Harvey Weinstein, effective immediately, less than a week after the New York Times published a report alleging decades of sexual harassment allegations against the Hollywood super-producer and Democratic party donor.

“In light of new information about misconduct by Harvey Weinstein that has emerged in the past few days, the directors of The Weinstein Company […] have determined, and have informed Harvey Weinstein, that his employment with The Weinstein Company is terminated, effective immediately,” TWC’s board of directors said in a statement released Sunday.

The company, which Weinstein co-founded and thrust into perennial Oscar glory, decided within days of announcing that its embattled boss would take an indefinite leave of absence.

In the wake of the Times bombshell report, three of the nine members of The Weinstein Company board — including billionaire publishing heir Dirk Ziff, Milwaukee Bucks co-owner Marc Lasry, and Technicolor Deputy CEO Tim Sarnoff — resigned.

Harvey Weinstein

In this March 2, 2014 file photo, Harvey Weinstein arrives at the Oscars in Los Angeles. Weinstein has been fired from The Weinstein Co., effective immediately, following new information revealed regarding his conduct, the company’s board of directors announced Sunday, Oct. 8, 2017. (Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP, File)

Weinstein had hired high-powered attorney Charles Harder, who won a $140 million settlement for Hulk Hogan against Gawker, before the Times story broke. But hours after the story went to print, Weinstein vowed to sue the paper for $50 million over what he called its “reckless reporting” and “inability to be honest with me” about the term of an alleged previous agreement.

Actress Meryl Streep, producer Harvey Weinstein and actress Margo Martindale attend a Q&A session following a screening of The Weinstein Co.’s “August: Osage County” at the DGA Theater on January 5, 2014 in Los Angeles, California. (Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)

The Academy Award-winning producer told Page Six last week that the Times “had a deal with us that they would tell us about the people they had on the record in the story, so we could respond appropriately, but they didn’t live up to the bargain.”

Weinstein has denied wrongdoing but apologized for the “pain” he has caused in a statement to the Times.

“I admit to a whole way of behavior that is not good. I can’t talk specifics, but I put myself in positions that were stupid, I want to respect women and do things better,” Weinstein said, vowing to change.

The Times reported that Weinstein had agreed to no less than eight financial settlements with women, dating back to the early 1990s, who had accused him of sexual harassment. The report detailed accusations from actresses Ashley Judd — who first worked with Weinstein on the 1997 film Kiss the Girls — and Rose McGowan, among others.

The story and the allegations in it caused several Hollywood actresses to called out Weinstein. A growing number of Democrat Party lawmakers have promised to return or donate the mass amounts of money Weinstein had donated to them over the years. Though there has been a deafening silence from late-night hosts, Saturday Night Live, and a number of A-list actresses in the wake of the scandal.

Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

SNL Smears Gun Owners as Crazy Poor People With Small Penises

While the adults were investigating the motives of the man responsible for the Las Vegas mass shooting, and other were discussing new regulations of bump stocks, the man-children at NBC’s Saturday Night Live were attacking all gun owners for the acts of one man. “The investigation into the tragedy in Las Vegas this week has sparked a larger debate in America between people who want common sense gun control and people who are wrong,” announced fake newsman Colin Jost, setting the tone for the bit.

This shouldn’t be a partisan issue,” Jost declared during the Weekend Update skit. The guy had 47 guns. No one should own 47 of anything. If you own 47 cats, you are not a responsible pet owner, you’re a crazy cat lady.” In a thinly veiled call for gun confiscation, he joked that “unlike with guns, the government will actually come and take your cats away, because everyone agrees that’s insane.” Actually, it’s because it’s animal cruelty.

Jost argued that alarms should sound when someone buys too many guns like his bank account does when he spends too much money. “How is no one keeping track of how many guns people own? There is a real law in Texas that says it’s illegal to own more than six dildos,” he pointed out, as if that was the evidence needed for greater gun control and not for the repeal of the intrusive Texas law.

Fake co-anchor Michael Che then slammed Second Amendment advocates as unbalanced snowflakes and claimed they shouldn’t need more than six bullets:

I mean, why is it so hard to get gun control in this country? I mean who are these delicate snowflakes that we can’t just tell: “No, you are not allowed to have 40 guns anymore, Earl. From now on you can have one gun, max, and six bullets. If you can’t hit what’s coming for you in six shots, then your ass needs to learn karate. Or use your words.”

VIDEO

I’m sick of this narrative that Americans just love guns so much. It’s a not true,” Che announced as he rattled off statistics with no cited source. 78 percent of Americans don’t even own a gun. And three percent of Americans own 50 percent of all the guns in the country. That’s the problem: that whinny three percent the country that needs to feel secure all the time.

So Che proposed a lewd sort of buyback program that could suit those insecure gun owners. “For every gun, you trade in, we give you one-half-inch of penis enlargement. That’s fair. If you trade in ten guns, you get five more inches,” he pitched to the cheers from the lowbrow audience.

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said that he wants Congress to look into some proposals for gun control. But first, he wants to look into this briefcase from the NRA,” he chided as he showed a picture of a briefcase with money hanging out of it. But the joke was on him because the NRA had come out in favor of greater regulation of bump stocks.

According to Che, gun owners were hypocritical for being patriotic and worried about the government. And of course he mocked them as people living in trailers:

Yeah, I noticed that the people who bring up the Second Amendment all the time are always the same people who preach “respect law enforcement, support the troops.” Meanwhile, they have a closet full of weapons because they think those same troops are going to come and drive their house away.

This just proves how elitists on the coast have nothing but pure disgust for the people living in fly-over-country. And it’s was ultimately why President Trump got elected.

Transcript below:

<<< Please support MRC’s NewsBusters team with a tax-deductible contribution today. >>>

NBC
Saturday Night Live
October 7, 2017
12:11:43 AM Eastern

COLIN JOST: The investigation into the tragedy in Las Vegas this week has sparked a larger debate in America between people who want common sense gun control and people who are wrong. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue. The guy had 47 guns. No one should own 47 of anything. If you own 47 cats, you are not a responsible pet owner, you’re a crazy cat lady. And unlike with guns, the government will actually come and take your cats away, because everyone agrees that’s insane.

Also, this guy bought 33 of his guns in the past year. And that didn’t set off any kind of alert? If I buy $100 worth of Chick-fil-A, I get a text message from my bank that says, “Did you just purchase $100 worth of Chick-fil-A? Please, Colin, tell us this is fraud.” How is no one keeping track of how many guns people own? There is a real law in Texas that says it’s illegal to own more than six dildos. And I get why. No one needs that many. If you own more than six dildos, it’s a clear sign you are training for something awful.

MICHAEL CHE: I mean, why is it so hard to get gun control in this country? I mean who are these delicate snowflakes that we can’t just tell: “No, you are not allowed to have 40 guns anymore, Earl. From now on you can have one gun, max, and six bullets. If you can’t hit what’s coming for you in six shots, then your ass needs to learn karate. Or use your words.”

I’m sick of this narrative that Americans just love guns so much. It’s a not true. 78 percent of Americans don’t even own a gun. And three percent of Americans own 50 percent of all the guns in the country. That’s the problem, that whinny three percent the country that needs to feel secure all the time. That’s why I think we should do a buy-back program. For every gun you trade in, we give you one-half-inch of penis enlargement. [ Cheers and applause ] That’s fair. If you trade in ten guns, you get five more inches. And if any women want to trade in their guns, don’t. Keep your guns. Because you’re probably going to need them to fight off all those men in spandex fighting to show off their brand-new penises.

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan said that he wants Congress to look into some proposals for gun control. But first, he wants to look into this briefcase from the NRA. We have got to do something about the guns this the country. And I know about the Second Amendment. I know you need your guns to protect you from the government.

Yeah, I noticed that the people who bring up the Second Amendment all the time are always the same people who preach “respect law enforcement, support the troops.” Meanwhile, they have a closet full of weapons because they think those same troops are going to come and drive their house away.

It’s hypocritical. It’s like saying, “I love my wife, I trust my wife, but that sneaky bitch is coming for me.”

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2v7eUfC

ICE Promises Raids of Homes, Businesses in Sanctuary California

ICE Promises Raids of Homes, Businesses in Sanctuary California

8 Oct, 2017
8 Oct, 2017

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says it will begin carrying out immigration raids in local neighborhoods and workplaces after California became a sanctuary state.

“ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) will have no choice but to conduct at-large arrests in local neighborhoods and at worksites, which will inevitably result in additional collateral arrests, instead of focusing on arrests at jails and prisons where transfers are safer for ICE officers and the community,” ICE Director Tom Homan wrote in a statement obtained by Breitbart Texas. “ICE will also likely have to detain individuals arrested in California in detention facilities outside of the state, far from any family they may have in California.”

The threat comes days after California Governor Jerry Brown delivered the gold to illegal aliens by making the entire state a sanctuary. Brown signed SB54, the “California Values Act” into law last week making it illegal, after January 1, 2018, for a local law enforcement officer to ask about a person’s immigration status during the course of routine interactions with the public, Breitbart News’ Michelle Moons reported.  The law also prohibits law enforcement officials from complying with ICE issued immigration detainers.

“This bill does not prevent or prohibit Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the Department of Homeland Security from doing their own work in any way,” Gov. Brown said after in the signing law and a signing statement.

DHS officials responded quickly and said the will go right to work in California.

“Ultimately, SB54 helps shield removable aliens from immigration enforcement and creates another magnet for more illegal immigration, all at the expense of the safety and security of the very people it purports to protect,” Homan stated.

SB54 will negatively impact ICE operations in California by nearly eliminating all cooperation and communication with our law enforcement partners in the state, voiding the delegated authority that the Orange County Sheriff’s Office has under the 287g program, and prohibiting local law enforcement from contracting with the federal government to house detainees.”

DHS said the department and ICE remain committed to its public safety mission. “We will continue to do our sworn duty to seek out dangerous criminal aliens and other immigration violators. ICE seeks straightforward cooperation with all sheriffs and local elected officials,” Homan concluded. “This misguided legislation will severely undermine those efforts.”

Bob Price serves as associate editor and senior political news contributor for Breitbart Texas. He is a founding member of the Breitbart Texas team. Follow him on Twitter @BobPriceBBTXGAB, and Facebook.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

HILLARY CLINTON IS THE GOP GIFT THAT KEEPS GIVING

Hillary Clinton refuses to accept reality and is desperately trying to cling to political relevance. She has enjoyed a lifetime of political privilege as a First Lady, a United States Senator, a Secretary of State and a presidential nominee of the Democratic Party. Sadly, she was awarded all of these prestigious positions because of her husband, not due to her own merit.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/11sy9G3

Was Vegas an FBI Sting Gone Bad?

Why is there no motive for the Vegas massacre? Why did Stephen Paddock have a secret life?

It is terrible to contemplate, but the possibility that Stephen Paddock was an undercover federal operative or informant cannot be ruled out. He may have been either set up or used by ISIS and/or a federal agency in a scheme that backfired.

via CanadaFreePress.Com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/11sy9G3