Shocking Courtroom Allegations Emerge In Weiner’s Underage Sex Scandal

Just when we thought we’d heard it all about the despicable and depraved Anthony Weiner, out comes another revelation.

In court papers filed this week before the Sept. 25 sentencing of the child sex predator, prosecutors say the former Democratic congressman repeatedly convinced an underage girl — just 15 years old — to strip naked and fondle herself while he watched over Skype.

What’s more, the girl “made clear that she was not just a minor — she was, in fact, only ​​15 years old,” the New York Post reports. “That did not stop Weiner,” the feds wrote.

“During the latter two Skype sessions, on February 18 and 23, 2016, and in a Shapchat communication on March 9, the defendant used graphic and obscene language to ask the Minor Victim to display her naked body and touch herself, which she did.”

Weiner, 53, also sent the girl an “obscene message” using an app called Confide, in which he described “what he would do to her, if she were 18,” court papers say.

“Part and parcel of these disturbing — and criminal — exchanges, the defendant also sent the Minor Victim adult pornography,” according to the feds.

​Prosecutors noted that ​Weiner “has acknowledged an interest in legal, adult, teen-themed pornography” which they said makes his claim that the girl’s age wasn’t a factor in his attraction ring “hollow.”

The feds also said that Weiner’s professed rehabilitation echoed his response to the sexting scandals that forced him to resign from Congress in 2011 and torpedoed his political comeback bid during the 2013 mayoral race.

“On prior occasions, as here, Weiner has followed the same pattern: he initially denied his conduct; he suffered personal and professional consequences; he publicly apologized and claimed reform,” prosecutors Amanda Kramer and Stephanie Lake wrote.

“Yet, he has, on multiple occasions, continued to engage in the very conduct he swore off, progressing from that which is self-destructive to that which is also destructive to a teenage girl — a minor the law recognizes as needing protection.”

The court filing further notes Weiner’s hypocrisy in having co-sponsored a 2007 bill aimed at forcing convicted perverts to list their email and instant-message addresses on the National Sex Offender Registry.

“In public remarks in support of the bill, the defendant recognized that “the Internet is the predator’s venue of choice today,” court papers say.

In May, Weiner pleaded guilty to transferring obscene material to a minor. He faces up to 10 years in prison when sentenced Monday, but several court watches say he could get as little as two years.

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1TJbF1r

Afghan Migrant Arrested for ‘Honour Killing’ His 14-Year-Old Sister

Afghan Migrant Arrested for ‘Honour Killing’ His 14-Year-Old Sister

21 Sep, 2017
21 Sep, 2017

An 18-year-old migrant from Afghanistan has been arrested in the Austrian capital of Vienna after police alleged he stabbed his own 14-year-old sister to death in an apparent honour killing.

The 18-year-old is said to have killed his sister on Monday after getting into a heated argument with her because she had complained to her parents about not wanting to go to school.

The young Afghan claimed he had “exploded” after his sister had shouted at their parents and physically pushed him, Kronen Zeitung reports.

Office for Youth and Family spokesman Petra Mandl disagreed with the assessment saying that schooling was very important to the girl and she had wanted to leave the household and live elsewhere. Mandl claimed the girl was under stress from her family who enforced traditional values in the household and say the girl visited a crisis centre to talk about it before she was killed.

The 18-year-old Afghan is not unknown to police in Vienna and is said to have a criminal history consisting of several crimes including fraud, theft, and uttering threats.

According to reports, the young migrant skipped out on court dates relating to previous crimes and a judge ordered the police to take him from his home on September 11th but they were unable to find him at his home in Vienna’s heavily migrant-populated district of Favoriten.

Defence lawyer Astrid Wagner said the young man expressed “regret” and claimed that he did not mean to kill his sister, just to hurt her.

The killing is the latest in a list of migrant perpetrated murders in the Austrian capital in recent years. The most notorious case occurred last year when a cleaning lady was bludgeoned to death by a failed asylum seeker whilst on her way to work in the migrant-populated district of Ottakring.

Another case in 2016 saw a migrant from Gambia, who was slated for deportation, kill a young American woman who had let him stay at her home to avoid being repatriated. The migrant strangled the young woman to death after she rejected his sexual advances.

Follow Chris Tomlinson on Twitter at @TomlinsonCJ or email at ctomlinson(at)breitbart.com 

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

USA Today Deeply Triggered by Border Wall that Supposedly Ruined a Golf Course

USA Today Deeply Triggered by Border Wall that Supposedly Ruined a Golf Course

21 Sep, 2017
21 Sep, 2017

USA Today Sports has found another reason to attack President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall, with the story of a Texas golf course that was cut in half by a border fence erected to prevent people from crossing into the U.S. illegally.

The Fort Brown Memorial Golf Course in Brownsville, Texas, was shut down several years after the border fence was erected across a portion of the former owner’s property, the paper reported.

The paper lamented the closing of the course saying, “It remains to be seen whether President Trump will be successful in delivering on his campaign promise to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, but such a barrier has already made this historic golf course in Texas’ deepest south unworkable and doomed.”

The fence was erected after the passing of the Secure Fence Act passed in 2006, long before Donald Trump jumped into politics.

“I had a business, the community had a place people could meet and socialize and enjoy life, and golf had an affordable spot,” the course’s former owner, Bob Lucio, told USA TODAY Sports. “Now it is like it never even existed.”

Lucio added that he began losing customers in 2009 when the government began to erect the fence on his property which butted up against the Rio Grande River.

“The government did what they did — they forced it on everybody,” Lucio told the paper. “In 2009 they actually started building the fence. It hurt our business right away. We slowly started to lose our membership.”

While USA Today focused heavily on the U.S. government as the reason the golf course finally closed in 2015, there was one other hint tucked down in the article.

Some customers stopped going to the golf course because, “they could sometimes hear gunfire from a drug cartel turf war raging on the Matamoros side.” From the article, “I didn’t know what war sounded like. I never went to war,” former member Bob Prepejchal said, remembering a wild Thursday afternoon when a peaceful round was interrupted by sounds of carnage. “When the (Mexican military) helicopters (were) flying and hovering over and let go of these rockets, it was unbelievable what it sounded like. Then there are those electronic Gatling guns … they were just raining down shells like crazy, and it went on for a while.”

Along with the drug war came skyrocketing insurance costs for his golf course and it all eventually forced him to declare bankruptcy.

Despite the drug gangs chasing customers away and the impossibly expensive insurance costs, the paper and the course owner felt it was all more about politics.

“I don’t get it,” Lucio said. “I didn’t get it then, and I still don’t. I have lived here all my life, and we used to celebrate our joint history with Mexico. When I put my time into the course, it was because I thought I’d be here forever.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Networks Could Lose $200 Million if NFL Ratings Slide Continues

Networks Could Lose $200 Million if NFL Ratings Slide Continues

21 Sep, 2017
21 Sep, 2017

If NFL fans continue to turn away from football, the TV networks could lose as much as $200 million in earnings, according to a new report.

After ratings for Week Two crashed, adding to the angst already felt by a poor showing in Week 1, industry insiders and analysts are sounding the alarm.

A new report claims that CBS, ESPN, Fox and NBC could take a $200 million hit to their estimated $2.5 billion in NFL advertising earnings if fans continue to turn off the TV, the The Hollywood Reporter noted recently.

The worries over earnings are not allayed by the fact that this season’s Week Two is the lowest mark for CBS since 1998. And the first two games of the season are down double-digits at a multi-year low compared to last year.

Guggenheim Securities analyst Michael Morris told THR that he had hoped the 2017 season would be better than last year, but admitted that “early results do not support this optimism.”

“Since the NFL season opened Sept. 7, shares of NBC parent Comcast are off 9 percent, ESPN parent Disney has seen its stock drop 3 percent and shares of CBS are down 5 percent,” THR wrote. “Only shares of 21st Century Fox have risen in that time frame, up 2 percent.”

Not only do analysts see a fall in ad revenue, but this decline may also result in falling stock prices for the networks.

Still, despite the declines, analysts also note that the NFL is TV’s biggest draw. However, as customer media consumption trends change, the NFL’s favored nation status among smaller quantities of viewers, may not be enough to stave off severe belt-tightening.

“Since the NFL season opened Sept. 7, shares of NBC parent Comcast are off 9 percent, ESPN parent Disney has seen its stock drop 3 percent and shares of CBS are down 5 percent,” THR wrote. “Only shares of 21st Century Fox have risen in that time frame, up 2 percent.”

Fans are leaving the league in droves, and several recent polls and studies show that political activism accounts for a big reason why.

In a poll last year, 44% of fans said they would stop watching the NFL if protests against the national anthem continued. In addition, a J.D. Power survey showed fans citing the anthem protests as the main reason they stopped watching NFL games.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Chamber of Commerce ‘Urges’ Trump, Congress to ‘Quickly’ Pass Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

The United States Chamber of Commerce is urging President Trump and Congress to “quickly” pass a widespread amnesty plan that would not only allow 800,000 illegal aliens to obtain a pathway to U.S. citizenship, but could also trigger a chain migration of at least four to six million foreign nationals flooding into the country.

In a letter by Senior Vice President Neil Bradley, obtained by Breitbart News, the Chamber of Commerce – big business’ largest lobbying arm – demands a quick for the 800,000 illegal aliens currently shielded by the Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, saying “the clock is ticking.”

The Chamber of Commerce letter in full reads:

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce urges Congress to act quickly to provide permanent relief for the approximately 800,000 individuals who will be negatively impacted by the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, commonly referred to as DACA.

Since 2012, individuals have enrolled in the DACA program in good faith, gaining the legal ability to attend school and work. As a result, they have become even further integrated into our communities and the nation’s economy. DACA recipients are our friends, our neighbors, and our coworkers. According to some estimates, approximately 700,000 are employed in the U.S., performing a wide variety of jobs across the economy.

If the DACA program is allowed to end, eventually none of these individuals will be legally allowed to remain—let alone work—in the U.S.

We are pleased to see the strong expressions of support within Congress and the Trump administration to provide permanent relief to DACA recipients that will protect them from deportation and put them on a track toward lawful permanent residency and, perhaps eventually, citizenship.

The statements of support must now be turned into a legislative solution. The clock is ticking.

We urge you to expeditiously work through the reasonable disagreements over the scope and details of a legislative solution as well as the inclusion of provisions to increase border security. The Chamber stands ready to work with you and the administration to ensure that the legislation crafted is consistent with fundamental American principles and the best interest of the nation and the American economy.

The Chamber of Commerce joins pro-mass immigration billionaires, the Koch brothers, who are major GOP establishment donors, as well as establishment politicians like Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) in their call for amnesty.

The Trump administration announced the end to DACA, via Attorney General Jeff Sessions, weeks ago, but has since waffled on the issue, with Trump going as far as praising the illegal aliens shielded by DACA.

The Chamber of Commerce has long opposed Trump’s populist-economic nationalist ‘America First’ agenda, coming out in April to oppose reforms to the H-1B visa, where hundreds of thousands of foreign workers can be imported to the U.S. to take American jobs, as Breitbart Texas reported.

Like the Chamber of Commerce, the Koch brothers, through their group ‘Libre Initiative,’ said this week that they were “encouraging” Congress to quickly pass an amnesty for illegal aliens, as Breitbart News reported.

The Koch brothers, despite strong opposition to Trump’s agenda, have managed to infiltrate White House discussions and potential policy initiatives in the administration in the form of Marc Short, who now serves as Trump’s Legislative Affairs Director.

Prior to joining the Trump White House, Short led the ‘Never Trump’ movement inside the Koch brothers’ pro-immigration organizations, as Breitbart News reported.

In May 2016, during the height of the Republican presidential primary, where Trump was taking the country by storm on his populist and economic nationalist agenda, Short was heading an effort to derail the then-front-runner.

At the time, National Review exclusively reported that Short was leading an effort inside the Koch brothers’ organizations to take down Trump and his agenda, partly by supporting Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), who infamously helped author the Gang of Eight amnesty bill:

On a frigid Tuesday in February, a team of top political operatives from the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, the umbrella group that controls political activities for the sprawling donor network led by billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch, arrived in Kansas for a meeting that they hoped would turn the tide of the presidential campaign.

They’d set aside $150 million to spend on paid media alone, to be spread across campaigns at the federal, state, and local levels. Yet they had not been authorized to spend a dime on the White House race.

Marc Short, then president of Freedom Partners, wanted to change that. He led a faction inside the Koch network that had become convinced of the need to neutralize Donald Trump before his momentum made him unstoppable. Fresh off Trump’s landslide victory in New Hampshire one week earlier, and staring down another likely Trump win in South Carolina that Saturday, Short and his lieutenants had come to Wichita to present Charles Koch with a detailed, eight-figure blueprint for derailing the Republican front-runner on Super Tuesday, when eleven states would vote. They hoped to get the green light to hammer Trump with ads in the states where he was most vulnerable.

Just a week after Short’s efforts to lead a full-fledged Koch-funded operation against Trump, he signed onto the Rubio campaign.

After Short left the Koch’s Freedom Partners, he praised the open borders, billionaire donors, saying, “Charles and David have built an amazing network of donors and activists, and their investments in future generations will pay huge dividends.”

Over the weekend, Short questioned what the definition of a “wall” truly is under Trump’s administration, as Breitbart News reported. Though building a border wall along the southern border was Trump’s key tenet of his America First agenda, Short said the wall is actually “a myriad of different structures.”

“I think that what the definition of a wall is, is something that we all need to have a serious conversation,” Short told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

DACA recipients currently hold upwards of 700,000 U.S. jobs. An ultimate end to the program – with DACA recipients not getting amnesty – could result in a 700,000 job stimulus for American workers. This would amount to nearly 30,000 new U.S. job openings for American workers every month once the program is officially phased out.

Although screening for DACA was previously touted as being sufficient in keeping criminals out, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) revealed that more than 2,100 recipients had their status revoked for being criminals or gang members.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Armed Texan Intervenes, Stops Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Jogger

Armed Texan Intervenes, Stops Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Jogger

21 Sep, 2017
21 Sep, 2017

Court documents filed this week claim an armed good Samaritan intervened and stopped an alleged sexual assault after hearing a female runner scream.

The incident occurred on a running trail near Lady Bird Lake in Austin, Texas.

According to the Austin American-Statesman, an affidavit claims the unidentified female was running around 5:46 a.m. when she began to hear loud steps closing in behind her. Suddenly, “the victim was grabbed behind by the suspect with both the suspect’s arms, (bear hug).” The victim said both she and the suspect fell to the ground “and she was on her back and the suspect was on top of her.”

The woman said she tried to use a whistle to attract help but the suspect had her pinned down. Moreover, he placed his hand over her mouth to mute her screams.

The suspect allegedly told the woman that he was “a virgin” as he assaulted her.

At some point, the woman was able to scream and nearby armed jogger heard her. He ran toward the scream with his handgun and flashlight drawn and ordered the suspect to get off the woman. The attacker allegedly stood up “naked from the waist down” and took off running with the woman’s shoes and shorts.

The partially naked woman walked toward the jogger who was holding the flashlight in hopes of finding protection.

Three days later, police arrested 22-year-old Richard Jordon McEachern and accused him of perpetrating the assault. Police are also investigating whether McEachern may have been involved in a similar assault–carried out by grabbing another female jogger from behind–on August 22.

On January 12, 2017, he New York Times editorial board wrote against expanding the opportunities for armed citizens to be armed for self-defense. The paper claimed, “The grim truth is that concealed-carry permit holders are rarely involved in stopping crime.”

AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host of Bullets with AWR Hawkins, a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Just Three Per Cent of over Two Million Migrant Arrivals Since 2015 Have Been Deported

Just Three Per Cent of over Two Million Migrant Arrivals Since 2015 Have Been Deported

21 Sep, 2017
21 Sep, 2017

Only 75,000 of the 2.2 million people who sought asylum in Europe in 2015 and 2016 have been deported to their homelands after their claims were rejected, a report has found.

More than half of the people who arrived during the migrant surge are still waiting for decisions on their asylum status, whilst those rejected are far more likely to “disappear” than be deported, according to a systematic study by the Pew Research Center.

Just eight per cent of asylum applicants in 2015 and 2016 had their claims definitively rejected, but only 75,000 of 2.2 million newcomers — three per cent — have been deported according to the report, which estimates that 100,000 failed asylum seekers are likely to be living in Europe illegally.

The study found that a third of the 52 per cent of migrants who were still waiting on decisions as of December 2016 were appealing the decision after being rejected, whilst the other two thirds had not yet had a decision made on their case.

People from Albania, Afghanistan, Kosovo, Serbia, Iran, Iraq, Russia, and Pakistan were the most likely to be kept waiting.

Although only two per cent of Albanian asylum claims are successful, just nine per cent who applied in 2015 and 2016 returned to their homelands whilst 89 per cent remained inside the EU, waiting for their initial application and appeal to go through.

Countries in Europe granted asylum to an estimated 885,000 migrants who applied in the period, with people who said they were from Syria most likely to receive a positive decision.

Almost half of Europe’s asylum applicants between 2015 and 2016 went to Germany, according to researchers, who also said that many of the people who initially applied in Hungary were so put off by its immigration system that they moved on to Austria and Germany.

For some European countries, the sudden massive influx of migrants from the third world changed the demographics of those nations noticeably, Pew said, highlighting that immigrant shares of total populations increased by more than one percentage point in countries like Sweden and Austria between 2015 and 2016.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Poland’s Anti Mass Migration Government Enjoys Record Popularity

Poland’s Anti Mass Migration Government Enjoys Record Popularity

20 Sep, 2017
20 Sep, 2017

Poland’s traditionally conservative, nationalist government is experiencing record support, despite widespread international media coverage of a number of protests that have been launched by foreign-funded groups.

The Law and Justice Party (PiS) made history in 2015 when it became the first party since the Cold War to win an election outright — meaning that for the first time the modern Polish state could be governed without the constraints of coalition.

Yet that landslide 37.58 per cent vote at the ballot box has been dwarfed by the growing popularity of the government since the vote, with a new poll by CBOS finding 43 per cent of Poles support the ruling party.

Even more significantly, Prime Minister Beata Szydło enjoys even greater personal support at 53 per cent, reports Polish Newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza.

Despite the historic democratic mandate and sustained support in Poland for Law and Justice, foreign media reports on the government’s policy programme have been overwhelmingly negative, with significant airtime given to anti-government protests.

Amongst the programmes being pushed through the government is a reduction in retirement age and reform of the nation’s Communist-era holdovers in the judicial system, both of which have been vigorously opposed by the European Commission’s Jean-Claude Juncker.

Protests and moves against the reforms have been linked to billionaire social-justice funder George Soros.

The involvement of the Commission in Polish politics in these matters has also triggered anti-Juncker protests in the country.

Another area in which the Polish government has triggered the criticism of foreign governments and news media and boosted its own profile at home is a strong opposition to mass migration, and opposition to the European Union’s plan to redistribute migrants received during the migrant crisis around the continent.

Whilst the European Union has threatened the Polish government with sanctions, including suspension of voting rights and even fines for refusing to change course on these issues, the government has remained unbending.

Breitbart London reported the remarks of Foreign Minister Witold Waszczykowski in August, when he stated the position of the nation plainly, saying: “The security of Poland is more important than the unjustified decisions of the European institutions on refugee issues.”

Follow Oliver Lane on Facebook, Twitter: or e-mail: olane[at]breitbart.com

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Obama’s subsidy-rich lifestyle

As much as former President Obama advises us that ‘at a certain point, you’ve made enough money‘ things are different when it comes to him. Redistribution advice is for little people. For him, it’s all about free stuff for multimillionaires, a subsidized lifestyle if there ever was one – for trips to Tahiti, to billionaire yachts, to Italy, to the Caribbean. There hasn’t really been anyone more at odds with his own advice once his own expenses are taken into account.

Already, we know Obama’s a copious consumer of luxury travel, given his gargantuan expenditures, often for useless or partisan political trips, while he was in office. According to the tally from Judicial Watch, it came to $105 million from the taxpayer, mostly for his end-to-end vacations.

But now, in his post-presidency, he’s spending up an even bigger storm. According to a citation from Tammy Bruce:

The Washington Times reported, “Former President Barack Obama is about to become the most expensive ex-president, costing taxpayers $1,153,000 next year, according to a new Congressional Research Service memo looking at the official allowances for the five living former chief executives. His $1,153,000 budget request for 2018 is more than $100,000 higher than George W. Bush’s request for next year and nearly $200,000 more than Bill Clinton’s expected budget. George H.W. Bush is slated to get $942,000, while Jimmy Carter will get less than half that, at just $456,000.”

Bruce notes that our subsidy-loving president is worth $25 million dollars, with he and he and his wife scarfup another $65 million in book deals. He’s also raking in $400,000 per speech, from the likes of places such as Goldman Sachs. Apparently, he hasn’t gotten to that ‘certain point’ yet.

Bruces notes that compared to other ex-presidents, Obama also is the biggest trough-feeder. He draws more than $1 million in pensions and office equipment, in addition to Secret Service protection. Yet he already has an enormous personal fortune.

Rep. Joni Ernst, she writes, is trying to put a stop to it, with a bill that puts caps on how much salary and expenses a multimillionaire ex-president can claim, proposing a $200,000 pension cap and a $250,000 office equipment cap. Bruce doesn’t think the bill goes far enough but at least the cookie jar will get its lid back.

Because the bottom line is that Obama never really sees himself as the superrich no matter how big his pile ges. He continues to view himself as a community organizer, taking after the welfare queens, following their example, and looting the taxpayers for all he can get. 

 

 

 

 

 

As much as former President Obama advises us that ‘at a certain point, you’ve made enough money‘ things are different when it comes to him. Redistribution advice is for little people. For him, it’s all about free stuff for multimillionaires, a subsidized lifestyle if there ever was one – for trips to Tahiti, to billionaire yachts, to Italy, to the Caribbean. There hasn’t really been anyone more at odds with his own advice once his own expenses are taken into account.

Already, we know Obama’s a copious consumer of luxury travel, given his gargantuan expenditures, often for useless or partisan political trips, while he was in office. According to the tally from Judicial Watch, it came to $105 million from the taxpayer, mostly for his end-to-end vacations.

But now, in his post-presidency, he’s spending up an even bigger storm. According to a citation from Tammy Bruce:

The Washington Times reported, “Former President Barack Obama is about to become the most expensive ex-president, costing taxpayers $1,153,000 next year, according to a new Congressional Research Service memo looking at the official allowances for the five living former chief executives. His $1,153,000 budget request for 2018 is more than $100,000 higher than George W. Bush’s request for next year and nearly $200,000 more than Bill Clinton’s expected budget. George H.W. Bush is slated to get $942,000, while Jimmy Carter will get less than half that, at just $456,000.”

Bruce notes that our subsidy-loving president is worth $25 million dollars, with he and he and his wife scarfup another $65 million in book deals. He’s also raking in $400,000 per speech, from the likes of places such as Goldman Sachs. Apparently, he hasn’t gotten to that ‘certain point’ yet.

Bruces notes that compared to other ex-presidents, Obama also is the biggest trough-feeder. He draws more than $1 million in pensions and office equipment, in addition to Secret Service protection. Yet he already has an enormous personal fortune.

Rep. Joni Ernst, she writes, is trying to put a stop to it, with a bill that puts caps on how much salary and expenses a multimillionaire ex-president can claim, proposing a $200,000 pension cap and a $250,000 office equipment cap. Bruce doesn’t think the bill goes far enough but at least the cookie jar will get its lid back.

Because the bottom line is that Obama never really sees himself as the superrich no matter how big his pile ges. He continues to view himself as a community organizer, taking after the welfare queens, following their example, and looting the taxpayers for all he can get. 

 

 

 

 

 

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1c2jbfc

Bernie Sanders goes there: Let’s have a “wealth tax”

You’re probably already aware of the growing popularity of Bernie Sanders among the furthest left wing of the Democratic Party. (Ironic, since Senator Sanders fled the party and re-registered as an independent as soon as his presidential bid ended.) One of his most often discussed proposals lately is a single payer health care scheme involving “Medicare for All.” The big sticking point on that plan is the almost unimaginable price tag that goes along with it and the question of how he plans to pay for it.

Sanders was largely mute on that subject until just recently. But now he’s gingerly stepped forward and begun to sketch out at least one way to raise part of the money. It’s an old chestnut from the socialist movement having some fresh life breathed into it, known as a “wealth tax.” (Buzzfeed)

When he introduced his Medicare-for-all bill last week, Bernie Sanders also put down on paper the idea he’s been talking about, sometimes loudly, sometimes with caution, other times not publicly at all, f0r more than 20 years: a “wealth tax” in the United States.

In 1997, in his book, Outsider in the House, he declared it “high time to establish a tax on wealth similar to those that exist in most European countries.” Nine years later, during his first race for U.S. Senate, his opponent quoted the passage online, printed it on brochures, and pushed it in statements: “Sanders’ European-style wealth tax,” on “everything they own every year. Every tractor, cow, and acre.” In response, the Sanders campaign argued that he had never formally proposed a wealth tax, just floated the idea.

At first glance one might think that Sanders was just talking about a massively higher income tax on wealthier Americans. Don’t be fooled. That’s old news because Sanders and many of his allies on the left have been screaming about “taxing the rich” for years, and at levels many voters today have never known in their lifetimes.

This is not a tax on new income for the year or even carried interest. It’s an audit of everything you’ve managed to acquire throughout your life, followed by the receipt of a tax bill calculated based on your total net worth.

Let’s be clear about one thing here. A so-called “wealth tax” can be readily defined as follows: It’s the death tax, only they make you pay it every year long before you’ve died. Even if you earn no money in a given year after your retirement or receive no interest payments on your savings, if you own a house, a car, a vacation property or, hypothetically a cow, a tractor and an acre of farmland, you will have to come up with the cash to pay the government a percentage of that total value. And if you live long enough in that static condition, they will eventually tax you until you have nothing.

That’s the socialist dream of eating the rich, torn straight from the pages of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Unfortunately for Sanders and his followers, while there are many people in the country who have achieved admirable success in their effort to grab a piece of the American dream, all of their wealth combined wouldn’t finance his plans for very long at all. It’s an unsustainable idea suited mostly for igniting the furor of the presumably oppressed masses who haven’t yet achieved any significant amount of prosperity.

I’m fairly sure that you could never get such a “wealth tax” past the GOP majority (or at least I’m praying we haven’t gone that far astray yet) or even some of the more sensible Democrats. But if we slide too far in the wrong direction, that could be on the horizon for you younger folks. Best of luck surviving it.

(This article was edited to remove a suggestion that Senator Sanders invoked the term involving, “every tractor, cow, and acre.” That language was employed by his opponent in the election mentioned.)

The post Bernie Sanders goes there: Let’s have a “wealth tax” appeared first on Hot Air.

via Hot Air

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com