Hillary Clinton Attacks Middle America, Calls For Elimination of Electoral College (VIDEO)

Hillary Clinton Attacks Middle America, Calls For Elimination of Electoral College (VIDEO)

Failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Wednesday that it is time to eliminate the Electoral College as she continues her blame tour.

Hillary Clinton despises middle America. She didn’t even visit Michigan or Wisconsin during her presidential campaign and now she’s openly calling for the elites in New York and California to call Presidential elections–to hell with rural America.

The Electoral College beautifully filtered out fraud during the 2016 presidential election. There are just so many ballots that one county can stuff. While there is much evidence of voter fraud, the EC really helped stop the fraud at County and State lines.

No wonder why Hillary wants it gone.

When Anderson Cooper asked Hillary if the Electoral College should be abolished, she replied in the affirmative, “I said that in 2000 after what happened in the 2000 election with Al Gore.”

“I think it needs to be eliminated,” Hillary said of the Electoral College. “I’d like to see us move beyond it, yes.”

Hillary bragged about ‘winning the popular vote’ by nearly 3 million votes and said she believes in ‘one person, one vote’.

Here are the hard cold facts. Donald Trump won 30 States to Hillary’s 20 States. Donald Trump won 2,623 Counties to Hillary’s 489 Counties. By looking at the map below, you can see that Hillary’s cosmopolitan, elitist bias is showing because she wants only the coastal states to determine the outcome of presidential elections.

Video via CNN:

VIDEO

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Sanders in 1987: ‘Astronomical’ Cost of Single-Payer ‘Would Bankrupt the Nation’

A video from 1987 shows Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) has not always considered single-payer health care a slam dunk for progressive reformers.

Sanders said Medicaid for every American "would bankrupt the nation" while he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, in a clip posted by the NTK Network. Speaking with physician Milton Terris on his local television show "Bernie Speaks with the Community," Sanders discussed the possibility of implementing single-payer health care in the U.S.

"You want to guarantee that all people have access to health care as you do in Canada," Sanders said.

"But I think what we understand is that unless we change the funding system and the control mechanism in this country to do that—for example, if we expanded Medicaid [to] everybody," Sanders added. "Give everybody a Medicaid card—we would be spending such an astronomical sum of money that, you know, we would bankrupt the nation."

But Sanders is now pushing basically the same idea with his Medicare-for-all proposal that has become a cause célèbre on the progressive left.

Sanders claims his bill would solve that problem by giving the government power to negotiate prices, but many experts consider his estimates highly optimistic. A study by the Urban Institute suggested that Sanders’ campaign plan would cost $32 trillion over 10 years, which is about double Sanders’ estimate of the revenue his measures would generate.

"Even with all of those potential revenue-boosters, Sanders may still fall far short of the total amount of money needed to pay for his ambitious program," Danielle Kurtzleben reported at NPR.

Hillary Clinton, Sanders’ opponent in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, has criticized the senator for previously not knowing how the government would pay for Medicare-for-all.

Sanders has garnered enthusiastic support among some Democratic leaders in the Senate, specifically those considered presidential contenders in 2020. These supporters include Sens. Cory Booker (D., N.J.), Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Kamala Harris (D., Calif.), although House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said it is not a litmus test for Democrats.

The post Sanders in 1987: ‘Astronomical’ Cost of Single-Payer ‘Would Bankrupt the Nation’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

SEE IT: Antifa, SJWs Chalk Up Berkeley To Protest Ben Shapiro Speech

The hysteria surrounding Daily Wire editor-in-chief Ben Shapiro’s “Say No To Campus Thuggery” event at University of California Berkeley this evening is reaching fever pitch. While law enforcement encloses the campus in concrete barriers and the school shuts down parts of the university and prepares safe spaces, activists have grabbed their chalk and covered the campus with protests.

As seen in a group of photos posted online (below), activists repeat several of the common declarations from the social justice/Antifa left.

“Free speech is not hate speech,” declares one chalk message, providing the left’s rationale for shutting down speech they don’t like.

“We don’t want your racist hate,” reads another, resorting to the SJWs’ standard unfounded accusation of racism.

“Immigrants are welcome here,” one message reads in another non sequitur.

“F**k Carol Christ,” says another, referencing Berkeley’s first ever female chancellor who has become a target of the left for simply reaffirming Berkeley’s once vaunted commitment to protecting free speech.

The protests come amid extreme security measures implemented by the school, including closure of multiple buildings and parking lots and the provision safe spaces and counseling for students, faculty and staff.

The Berkeley Police Department is also implementing its own unusually drastic steps, including providing campus “walking escorts” and alternative routes to protect people from protester violence and setting up concrete barriers all over the area to try to contain Antifa.

More details on the event:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1TJbF1r

CNN Celebrity Chef Anthony Bourdain Says He Would Poison Trump’s Food

CNN Celebrity Chef Anthony Bourdain Says He Would Poison Trump’s Food

14 Sep, 2017
14 Sep, 2017

TV foodie Anthony Bourdain told paparazzi outside an airport that if he was asked to cater a dinner for President Donald Trump, he would poison the food.

The former Food Network personality and current host of CNN’s Parts Unknown was caught outside LAX airport by a photographer for celebrity gossip website TMZ. Bourdain was asked whether or not he would go to North Korea to do a food show.

Bourdain said that everyone in North Korea is starving, so there is no reason to go there. He also called the diminutive dictator of the oppressed nation a series of obscene names, saying Kim Jong-un is a “chubby, evil little f***.”

But then the TMZ stringer asked what Bourdain would serve if he was asked to cater a dinner for President Trump.

Bourdain answered simply, “Hemlock,” appearing to admit he would poison the president if given the chance.

VIDEO

The TMZ reporter also asked about what the TV chef thinks of the president’s tweets, but all Bourdain gave was a shrug of his shoulders.

This isn’t the first time the TV food personality spoke about dining with the president. Last year, Bourdain said he would “absolutely f*cking not” dine with Trump.

Also in 2016, Bourdain insisted that he would boycott the restaurant in Trump’s Washington D.C. hotel.

“I will never eat in his restaurant,” Bourdain said right after Trump won the White House. “I have utter contempt for him, utter and complete contempt.”

 

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Sex robots are on the rise — but are they beneficial to society?

What is a sex robot?

Sex robots are anatomically correct hyperrealistic dolls that mimic human movements to create the experience of being with a real human. Some have extra features, such as built-in heaters to simulate body warmth, sensors that react to touch, and the ability to speak, give specific voice-activated responses, smile, and even sing.

How much do they cost?

A standard sex robot starts around $6,000, and can range up to $12,000 or more, depending on extra features added. Robots that are custom made to a client’s specifications can be even more expensive. Harmony, one prototype set to release later this year, already has a set price of $15,000. The first AI sex robot was made a few years ago, and due to popularity, more technology companies are investing in the specialized robot industry.

What the experts are saying

● “With AI particularly, one of the things we realize in psychology is that sometimes just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should do it and I think sex dolls are a perfect example. We’re objectifying women, but worse than that, we’re commercializing them — becoming consumers of women’s bodies in this way.” — British psychologist Emma Kenney

● “If we are talking about individuals who are not only disabled but have been traumatized, in some ways this could be a beneficial instrument, if you will, to help them in their [sexual] healing process… You have to strike a balance between lack of regulation – so we have all different uses and personifications of children and women as sexual objects – or you have overregulation and you stifle the technology.” —Dr Aimee van Wynsberghe, assistant professor in ethics and technology at Delft University of Technology

● “We have already seen rapid changes in human relationships thanks to the internet, mobile devices and social media. The next major advance will enable us to use our technology to have intimate encounters with the technology itself – to fall in love with the technology, to have sex with robots and to marry them.” — David Levy, artificial intelligence expert and author of the book “Love and Sex” with Robots

● “Sex with a robot is just a fake imitation. And it can lead to psychopathic disorders and isolation… Sex with robots won’t bring into a person’s life the emotion effect that gives us a true communion. You can eat pseudo-food to still hunger. But over time, it will still end badly.” — Sexologist Lev Shcheglov

A real life experience

One sex robot user, Arran Wright, appeared on the British talk show “This Morning” to explain his typical day-to-day with his sex robot, Samantha. He told the co-hosts that the sex robot often spends time with his wife and kids, who ask for her.

“When I put her in the car, they really enjoy it,” Wright said.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.theblaze.com

Thousands of Federal Buildings Are Now Missing 1 Traditional Item

Advertisement – story continues below

After nearly nine months in office, portraits of our president and vice president have yet to be hung in thousands of federal offices across the country.

A report from the The Washington Post Monday revealed official portraits of both President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence haven’t been hung in several federal courthouses, military installations, ports of entry and a slew of other federal buildings.

Longstanding tradition asserts that the president and vice president’s portraits hang in the lobbies of federal buildings, serving as a sign of respect to our nation’s leaders.

Advertisement – story continues below

While Trump and Pence haven’t yet taken official photographs for their portraits, it still raises many questions as to whether there are photos of former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden still hanging in federal buildings.

“GPO is standing by to reproduce copies of the president and the vice president’s photos for official use in federal facilities and will do so as soon as the official photo files are provided to us,” said Gary Somerset, a spokesman for the Government Publishing Office.

“I do not have a timeline on when GPO will receive those files from the White House,” he said.

Advertisement – story continues below

The White House said the administration will send the portraits to the GPO to make mass copies once the photos are finalized.

“All agencies who have requested the President’s portrait have received a photo to display. We’re still in the process of creating the official portrait. Once it’s been produced, the White House photo office will distribute it to all of the agencies and other requests,” Lindsay E Water, a White House spokesperson, said.

Further proving how self-important he believed himself to be, Obama released his official portrait just one week into his presidency. Former President Bill Clinton waited nearly one year to have his sent out to government buildings.

Several other high-ranking cabinet members have declined to hang their portraits, choosing the more respectful path and waiting for the president and vice president to have their photos sent out first.

Advertisement – story continues below

Trump and Pence have been quite busy since they took over in January.

Aside from undoing a plethora of policy Obama signed into law, the president has remained focused on pushing big ticket items such as health care, tax reform, the border wall and immigration reform through DACA, not to mention dealing with an increasingly hostile North Korea.

On top of that incredibly difficult agenda, the Trump administration has also dealt with the aftermath of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, which wreaked havoc across Texas and Florida.

It should make the American people proud this administration is more focused on passing important issues and improving the nation rather than taking pictures of themselves.

H/T Daily Caller

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that President Trump and Vice President Pence have been focused on big issues rather than having their portraits taken!

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

There’s More than 1 Way to Skin a Cat…and Destroy KJU’s Bunkers

Advertisement – story continues below

Kim Jong Un thinks that his weapons are safe deep within underground bunkers. However, what he may not realize is that there is more than one way to penetrate and destroy these bunkers.

“North Korea has said through state media that it has no choice but to advance its nuclear and missile development to defend ­itself from attack. It says its weapons program is impervious to sanctions and is already capable of hitting the US with a nuclear-tipped missile,” The Australian reported.

However, according to Popular Mechanics, there are currently nine ways that a fortress buried deep within the ground can be targeted and destroyed. Should it ever come to this, the United States military has ways to decommission Kim’s weapons while they sit in their hiding place.

Advertisement – story continues below

“The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) is a Pentagon organization tasked with combating weapons of mass destruction, including WMDs stored deep underground in concrete bunkers, tunnels, and mountains,” the outlet reported.

Without further ado, here are the ways in which we can discover and destroy Kim’s bunkers, as listed by Popular Mechanics.

Method Number One: GBU-57 MASSIVE ORDNANCE PENETRATOR
The “biggest and the best munition” the DTRA has currently is a 20 foot long bomb, weighing in at 14 tons. It is able to drive through more than 60-feet of concrete.

Advertisement – story continues below

Method Number Two: GIANT SHAPED CHARGE
This is an explosive shaped charge which is able to “punch a hole” through solid rock, leading the way for a follow-up warhead to destroy a target buried deep within the ground. This one is super impressive; however, it is reportedly difficult to scale up to a large size. The largest known shaped charge weighs in at 700 pounds and was developed by Sandia National Laboratories back in 2003. That charge was able to drill through 20-feet of rock, creating a large enough tunnel for a follow-up missile.

Method Number Three: ISOMER BOMB
A hypothetical device in which a bomb is triggered by energy release from “a nuclear isomer of the element hafnium.” While it doesn’t pack the same punch as a nuclear bomb, it can potentially be thousands of times more powerful than dynamite. However, research into this type of bomb was halted due to officials being unsure about the validity of the science behind it.

Method Number Four: HARD TARGET MUNITION
These smaller and lightweight bunker busters weight about 2,000 pounds. They can be carried internally by an F-35 and then be “rocket-boosted to high velocity, possibly even supersonic speed.” While impressive, more tests need to be done in order to work on the rock lag that the hard target ammunition faces once shot into the ground.

Method Number Five: INFILTRATION DRONES
The Air Force has reportedly looked into “swarms of crawling drones” similar to the science-fiction ones found in the Tom Cruise film “Minority Report.” These drones would be able to sneak into air ducts or small entry points like sewage pipes to find and destroy the bombs. Research is still being done to make this possible; however, it seems that this may only work once if it is ever employed.

Advertisement – story continues below

Method Number Six: EMP BLASTER
“If you can’t physically destroy a facility, just make it useless. Knocking out all the electronics and the power system with a powerful electromagnetic pulse will put it out of action,” the outlet reported, adding that the United States Army has recently worked to develop a Phaser weapon that would essentially be able to short-circuit all electronic devices with a beam of microwaves. The Air Force has a similar device known as the CHAMP which can be carried on a cruise missile.

Method Number Seven: SUPERCAVITATING PENETRATOR
This technology would allow a high-speed rocket to torpedo down towards the bunker. “The idea is that bombs can glide through earth and rock behind a cushion of gas,” Popular Mechanics explained.

Method Number Eight: DEEP DIGGER
The Deep Digger is a burrowing 2,000-pound bomb which is able to blast through 200-feet of solid rock with a “set of nose-mounted cannons.” Developed by the United States Army in 2007, the plan then was to have a swarm of deep diggers be detonated simultaneously to create an artificial earthquake, thereby collapsing the deepest bunkers.

Method Number Nine: ROBOTIC UNDERGROUND MUNITION 
This cousin of the Deep Digger is a robot that can be parachuted down into the target area to find the bunker and then tunnel down into the ground. “Like a more stealthy version of The Mole from Thunderbirds… RUM would also carry defensive systems in case anyone tried to stop it,” the outlet concluded.

Kim Jong Un must understand that he is playing with the big boys now, and he really shouldn’t test our patience anymore. The United States military has plenty of options to infiltrate his bunkers. Under President Donald Trump’s leadership, the military may not hesitate to employ these strategies.

Boom!

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter and be sure to add your thoughts on the different ways to destroy Kim Jong Un’s bunkers.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

Here’s A Black Rapper Lynching A Little White Boy

Rapper XXXTentacion (I have no idea who to pronounce that) is most famous for getting knocked out cold on stage by a rival crew. He probably figured that wasn’t the dopest thing to be remembered for so he made a video where he lynches a little white boy. Nothing gets a rapper’s name out their more than killing whitey and murdering a white child is sure to send him to the top of the heap.

VIDEO

In his new video for the song “Look at Me” XXXTentacion starts things off in a classroom where he and his fellow thugs beat a white teacher to death. It kind of looks like XXXTentacion is dry humping the corpse at one point. Sadly, this is the least horrible thing in the video.

From there the lynching of Emmit Till, the Philando Castile shooting, and the Rodney King beating are highlighted. He also throws in some Charlottesville just to be relevant. The message is that whitey is alway killing the black man for no reason.

Worry not, XXXTentacion is going to get some payback. At around the 2:15 mark a little white boy and a little black boy are walked onto a stage where a noose is hanging. XXXTentacion whispers something to each child and then makes his decision. He slips the noose over the white boy’s head and then hoists him off of the stage. You can see the white kid dangling as his legs twitch and he eventually dies.

After that, XXXTentacion goes on an incohesive rant where he’s basically trying to say that murder is bad no matter what the race of the killer is. To be honest, this thing barely qualifies as a music video. In the 5 and a half minute running time, there’s probably around 30 seconds of actually music, not that rap is actual music.

I think XXXTentacion is trying to make some kind of profound statement here, but it doesn’t come through very clear. The basic impression I got out of this is that it’s pretty much a black fantasy revenge video in which the white man gets what’s coming to him.

Whatever this rapper was going for, there are better ways to make a point than killing a little kid. All while we are on the subject, let’s talk about the horrible stage mom who let her little boy get lynched in this video. What the hell is the matter with some people?

Now, for fun, here’s XXXTentacion getting knocked the f*ck out:

VIDEO

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

OK Cupid Partners with Planned Parenthood to Filter Out Pro-Life Users

OK Cupid Partners with Planned Parenthood to Filter Out Pro-Life Users

13 Sep, 2017
13 Sep, 2017

Popular dating service OkCupid has partnered with Planned Parenthood to “enable daters to find folks who support” the abortion provider.

OkCupid announced the partnership in an image posted on Twitter which read, “I would never date someone who doesn’t support Planned Parenthood. (OkCupid makes it easy to find them.)”

According to a report, the platform will attempt to filter out users by making their views on the organization public in their profile pictures.

“The badge will read ‘#IStandWithPP’ and will be prominently displayed on the profile of every OkCupid member who has publicly responded ‘no’ to the question ‘Should the government defund Planned Parenthood?’” the report claimed.

In a statement, OkCupid’s CMO Melissa Hobley declared the company was “really exciting because it enables us to help people connect on the issues that matter to them.”

“In this current climate, this matters more than ever when it comes to finding ‘your person,’” Hobley claimed. “We know that Planned Parenthood is driving conversations, support and education that millions care about. When we looked at the data, we saw that our community on OkCupid was talking about Planned Parenthood…so we decided to make it easy to find the folks who cared about the same thing.”

Dawn Laguens, Executive Vice President of Planned Parenthood, also released a statement, claiming, “Knowing your prospective date supports equal rights, access to reproductive health care and the best, evidence-based sex education is undeniably sexy, and OkCupid’s new Planned Parenthood badge will let users see that immediately.”

“At Planned Parenthood, we are continually looking for innovative approaches to get people the information and care they need to lead healthy lives and achieve their goals,” she continued. “Whether that’s on their phones or in a health center.”

Charlie Nash is a reporter for Breitbart Tech. You can follow him on Twitter @MrNashington and Gab @Nash, or like his page at Facebook.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Watch: Weather Channel Founder Sets Climate Change Nut Straight With Facts

Advertisement – story continues below

During an appearance on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” three years ago, The Weather Channel founder John Coleman destroyed, eviscerated and demolished both CNN and host Brian Stelter over their fanatical dedication to the unproven theory of man-made climate change.

“I resent you calling me a ‘denier,’” he initially told Stelter, referencing the host’s decision to identify him as a so-called “climate denier,” according to a transcript from The Heartland Center. “I’m a skeptic about climate change.”

Stelter then made the unwise decision to interrupt Coleman to tell him how much he personally loves The Weather Channel. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is when Coleman began letting him have it.

Advertisement – story continues below

“I’m talking now!” he barked back. “Hold on just a minute. I’m not done. And CNN has taken a very strong position on global warming that it is a consensus. There is no consensus in science. Science isn’t a vote. Science is about facts. And if you get down to the hard cold facts, there’s no question about it. Climate change is not happening.”

When Stelter interrupted him again shortly thereafter to argue that it wouldn’t be possible for them to reach a definitive conclusion on man-made climate change during the show, Coleman hit him again. “Oh I know we’re not, because you would’t allow it to happen on CNN,” he snarkily replied.

Watch the full brutal interview below:

The remainder of the interview continued in the same vein, with Stelter repeatedly trotting out bogus “facts,” and Coleman slapping them down every time.

“That’s a manipulated figure and let me explain it to you,” he said when Stelter touted the “fact” that 97 percent of climate scientists believe in climate change.

He explained that the government will only fund scientists who produce certain scientific results that fit their desired agenda.

“So, they don’t have any choice,” he said. “If you’re going to get the money, you gotta support their position. Therefore, 97 percent of the scientific reports published support global warming. Why? Because those are the ones the government pays for and that’s where the money is.”

Advertisement – story continues below

“I’m not a scientist, so I’m not going to try to refute you,” Stelter replied, to which Coleman replied with the slam of the year: “Boy, that’s the truth.

Ain’t it, though!?

“So please stand back from this issue … There are 31,000 scientists who have signed a petition that says it is not valid, that my position is correct,” he added. “And we’ll keep battling, and we will prevail in time, but I don’t know if we’ll do it in my lifetime.”

As of September, an astonishing 31,487 scientists with 9,029 PhDs have signed the petition.

H/T Facebook

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about the founder of The Weather Channel slapping Brian Stelter around like a piñata.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE