Bernie vs. Bernie: Single-payer utopia then & now

**Written by Doug Powers

Time for another episode of “Socialism Vision” vs. “Socialism Reality,” this time courtesy of the same socialist (with an assist from some like-minded Dems).

The wind-up:

And the pitch:

A video from 1987 shows Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) has not always considered single-payer health care a slam dunk for progressive reformers.
[…]
“You want to guarantee that all people have access to health care as you do in Canada,” Sanders said.

“But I think what we understand is that unless we change the funding system and the control mechanism in this country to do that—for example, if we expanded Medicaid [to] everybody,” Sanders added. “Give everybody a Medicaid card—we would be spending such an astronomical sum of money that, you know, we would bankrupt the nation.”

VIDEO

And it’s not as if the nation’s in a better position to be able to afford that extra trillions and trillions of dollars for more “free” stuff:

In 1987, when Sanders said single-payer would “bankrupt the nation,” the national debt was just over $2 trillion.

But anyway, for some reason Sanders seems to think that today’s super-expensive “free” is less super-expensive than it was 30 years ago. Inflation doesn’t apply to socialist pipe dreams.

**Written by Doug Powers

Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

via MichelleMalkin.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/xFYtWG

Leftists, Never-Trumpers Gloat over MAGA Voters’ DACA Dismay

Leftists, Never-Trumpers Gloat over MAGA Voters’ DACA Dismay

14 Sep, 2017
14 Sep, 2017

Leftists and Never-Trumpers took to Twitter to ridicule President Donald Trump’s supporters after news broke Thursday night of a pro-amnesty deal struck with Democrat lawmakers — which many Trump voters saw as a broken campaign promise.

Amongst those poking fun at Trump’s base was Chicago Tribune humor columnist Rex Huppke, author M.J. Pack, and GOP strategist Rick Wilson.

Celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton had a fittingly childish response:

Forbes contributor Josh Jordan tweeted:

New York Post columnist John Podhoretz called Rep. Steve King a “troglodyte buffoon” for saying the “Trump base is blown up” if the DACA deal was struck:

Rick Wilson didn’t hold back in his opinion of Trump and his supporters:

Raw Story reports that Wilson deleted a tweet saying: “I will continue to enjoy the taste of your ocean of tears.”

Seth Mandel, the op-ed editor at the New York Post, tweeted:

Eric Owens of the Daily Caller crowed that Trump voters were experiencing “cuckolding”:

Comedian Michael Ian Black seemed elated that Trump had turned everyone against him with his latest decision:

And Daily Wire Editor-In-Chief Ben Shapiro, formerly Senior Editor-at-Large for Breitbart News, used multiple gifs to describe his thoughts:

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan_ or email him at lnolan@breitbart.com.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

NYT’s Peters: Trump’s ‘New Best Friend’ Pelosi ‘Is Going to Impeach Him if She Gets the House Back’

NYT’s Peters: Trump’s ‘New Best Friend’ Pelosi ‘Is Going to Impeach Him if She Gets the House Back’

14 Sep, 2017
14 Sep, 2017

On Thursday’s broadcast of “MSNBC Live,” New York Times political reporter and MSNBC Contributor Jeremy Peters stated that House Minority Leader Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who he dubbed “the president’s new best friend,” will impeach President Trump if Democrats win the majority in the House.

Peters said that neither Pelosi nor Trump are trustworthy in the negotiations over immigration. He added, “[T]he president’s new best friend, the minority leader in the House, is going to impeach him if she gets the House back. I mean, that is going to happen. And Trump should realize that. And he thinks, right now, that he’s cutting a deal to really — what I think his ultimate impulse here, his ultimate motives are to undermine Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell and remind them that he’s fully capable of cutting these deals on his own. But, you know, the establishment Republicans are not your friends, Donald Trump. The Democrats are really not your friends.”

(h/t Daily Caller)

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

Read More Stories About:

Breitbart TV, Donald Trump, impeachment, jeremy peters, Nancy Pelosi

P.S. DO YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES
LIKE THIS ONE DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX?
SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY BREITBART NEWSLETTER.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Red Alert: NK Missile Launched Toward Japan

Advertisement – story continues below

It would appear that North Korea’s authoritarian dictator Kim Jong Un is feeling feisty again, as he has reportedly just fired off another ballistic missile in Japan’s direction.

According to Bloomberg, Japanese broadcaster NHK reported that the missile of unspecified type was launched at approximately 7:00 a.m. Friday morning, and flew over the island nation of Japan toward the Pacific Ocean.

Japan’s military did not make any effort to shoot down the missile as it passed overhead.

Advertisement – story continues below

Reuters reported that South Korean military observers spotted the missile as it was launched from the Sunan district of the North Korean capitol of Pyongyang and began heading in an easterly direction toward Japan.

South Korean military officials and their American counterparts are currently analyzing the details of the launch, and will likely release more information as it becomes known.

According to a separate report from Reuters, the launch came less than a day after the North Korean state-run news agency KCNA published a statement that openly threatened to “sink” the entire island chain of Japan and reduce the U.S. to “ashes and darkness” with nuclear weapons, likely in response to the latest economic sanctions imposed on the rogue regime by the United Nations.

Advertisement – story continues below

“The four islands of the archipelago should be sunken into the sea by the nuclear bomb of Juche. Japan is no longer needed to exist near us,” declared the Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee, an external propaganda outlet for the communist regime, in a statement carried by KCNA.

“Juche” is a sort of ideological mixture of extreme Marxist nationalism that was championed by the nation’s nuclear-ambitious founder and current leader’s grandfather, Kim Il-Sung, as per the Reuters report.

The committee’s statement also expressed their desire to “reduce the U.S. mainland into ashes and darkness. Let’s vent our spite with mobilization of all retaliation means which have been prepared till now.”

As our readers are well aware, tensions on the Korean peninsula and across the broader east Asian region have been remarkably high in recent weeks following a nuclear test explosion on Sept. 3, which came close on the heels of a ballistic missile that was fired over Japan’s northern island of Hokkaido on Aug. 28.

Advertisement – story continues below

As of yet, there has been no official response from the White House, but given President Donald Trump’s repeated remarks along the lines of the time for talk being over, and Secretary of Defense James Mattis’ reassurances to allies that the American military is more than ready to end the North Korean threat, it will be interesting to see what the Trump administration’s reply to this latest provocation will be.

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter to let everyone know that North Korea fired a ballistic missile over Japan, again.

via Conservative Tribune

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/2gEOIzE

ACLU Threatens Police Chief For Posting Bible Verses On Facebook

For an organization known as the American Civl Liberties Union, these clowns sure don’t know jack about our civil rights or the Constitution that guarantees them. They believe that the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms is a collective right that guarantees the government’s right to have guns and not an individual right of personal gun ownership. Equally as wrong, they think the Constitution forbids a local police chief from expressing his Christian faith and are threatening a lawsuit.

KSWO reports that the Chief of police in Mounds, OK has been posting Bible verses to the department’s Facebook page for about a year now. By all accounts these posts have been well received by the community.

“It’s nothing about trying to put any other faith down, but it’s just more one of just trying to be encouraging to others, prayer to me is universal,” Chief Antonio Porter said.

If there is one thing that the ACLU hates as much as guns it’s Christianity and this innocent act that offended no one has caused the organization to freak the hell out. ACLU legal director Brady Henderson fired off this angry response:

Both the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution protect against government officials establishing a state religion. The exclusive, pervasive promotion of the Christian faith by the Mounds Police Department represents a clear violation of those legal mandates. By promoting one specific religion on its official Facebook page, the Mounds Police Department has established clear preference for that faith above other faiths and above no religious faith at all. This kind of government interference with our religious freedom is simply not permissible under United States or Oklahoma law.

It’s interesting that the ACLU thinks forcing a man to stop expressing his Christian faith is protecting freedom of religion. This is just more proof that liberals have entirely different definitions for words and concepts.

The ACLU then goes off the deep end and accuses the Mounds Police Department of refusing to protect non-Christians in its jurisdiction.

In addition to the clear violation of one of the central tenets of American government, freedom of religion, the actions of the Mounds Police Department call into question whether or not the department can be trusted to adequately protect all those living under its jurisdiction, including members of minority faiths and those of no religious faith at all. By establishing a preference for the Christian faith, the department undermines confidence in their ability to perform their duties in a manner consistent with our understanding of one of our most basic and cherished liberties.

Let’s take a look at the facts here. This is the entire 1st Amendment, which guarantees our right to freedom of religion: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (my emphasis)

It says that Congress shall make no law establishing a state religion. Is the police chief of a small Oklahoma town Congress? Is posting something on Facebook making a law? Does posting bible verses establish a state religion? It’s a big “no” on all of those questions. There is nothing about what this police chief is doing that is even remotely related to the 1st Amendment, other than he does have a right to express himself.

When liberals like the ACLU talk about the “separation of church and state” they act as if this is something that is in the Constitution, but it is not. The only thing the Constitution has to say on the matter is that Congress cannot force a religion on the people or stop people from expressing their religion.

There isn’t even a Supreme Court decision to support the ACLU’s twisted interpretation of the 1st Amendment, though there is one that affirms that gun ownership is an individual right. Yet somehow this “civil liberties” group thinks people aren’t allowed to own guns and individuals aren’t able to express their religious beliefs.

It’s this same bad read on religious freedom that has the ACLU threatening and suing schools for throwing Christmas pageants. Would they ever sue a Muslim elected official for quoting the Koran? Hell no, that would be racist or Islamaphobic or something.

Clearly the ACLU needs to change it’s name because they are not concerned with American civil liberties. In fact, the Federal Trade Commission should sue them for false advertising. If all they cover is shit that pisses liberals off, they can’t claim to protect all civil liberties for all people.

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter

via Downtrend.com

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://downtrend.com

Hillary Clinton Attacks Middle America, Calls For Elimination of Electoral College (VIDEO)

Hillary Clinton Attacks Middle America, Calls For Elimination of Electoral College (VIDEO)

Failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Wednesday that it is time to eliminate the Electoral College as she continues her blame tour.

Hillary Clinton despises middle America. She didn’t even visit Michigan or Wisconsin during her presidential campaign and now she’s openly calling for the elites in New York and California to call Presidential elections–to hell with rural America.

The Electoral College beautifully filtered out fraud during the 2016 presidential election. There are just so many ballots that one county can stuff. While there is much evidence of voter fraud, the EC really helped stop the fraud at County and State lines.

No wonder why Hillary wants it gone.

When Anderson Cooper asked Hillary if the Electoral College should be abolished, she replied in the affirmative, “I said that in 2000 after what happened in the 2000 election with Al Gore.”

“I think it needs to be eliminated,” Hillary said of the Electoral College. “I’d like to see us move beyond it, yes.”

Hillary bragged about ‘winning the popular vote’ by nearly 3 million votes and said she believes in ‘one person, one vote’.

Here are the hard cold facts. Donald Trump won 30 States to Hillary’s 20 States. Donald Trump won 2,623 Counties to Hillary’s 489 Counties. By looking at the map below, you can see that Hillary’s cosmopolitan, elitist bias is showing because she wants only the coastal states to determine the outcome of presidential elections.

Video via CNN:

VIDEO

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/SIPp5X

Sanders in 1987: ‘Astronomical’ Cost of Single-Payer ‘Would Bankrupt the Nation’

A video from 1987 shows Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) has not always considered single-payer health care a slam dunk for progressive reformers.

Sanders said Medicaid for every American "would bankrupt the nation" while he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, in a clip posted by the NTK Network. Speaking with physician Milton Terris on his local television show "Bernie Speaks with the Community," Sanders discussed the possibility of implementing single-payer health care in the U.S.

"You want to guarantee that all people have access to health care as you do in Canada," Sanders said.

"But I think what we understand is that unless we change the funding system and the control mechanism in this country to do that—for example, if we expanded Medicaid [to] everybody," Sanders added. "Give everybody a Medicaid card—we would be spending such an astronomical sum of money that, you know, we would bankrupt the nation."

But Sanders is now pushing basically the same idea with his Medicare-for-all proposal that has become a cause célèbre on the progressive left.

Sanders claims his bill would solve that problem by giving the government power to negotiate prices, but many experts consider his estimates highly optimistic. A study by the Urban Institute suggested that Sanders’ campaign plan would cost $32 trillion over 10 years, which is about double Sanders’ estimate of the revenue his measures would generate.

"Even with all of those potential revenue-boosters, Sanders may still fall far short of the total amount of money needed to pay for his ambitious program," Danielle Kurtzleben reported at NPR.

Hillary Clinton, Sanders’ opponent in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, has criticized the senator for previously not knowing how the government would pay for Medicare-for-all.

Sanders has garnered enthusiastic support among some Democratic leaders in the Senate, specifically those considered presidential contenders in 2020. These supporters include Sens. Cory Booker (D., N.J.), Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Kamala Harris (D., Calif.), although House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said it is not a litmus test for Democrats.

The post Sanders in 1987: ‘Astronomical’ Cost of Single-Payer ‘Would Bankrupt the Nation’ appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.

via Washington Free Beacon

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://freebeacon.com

SEE IT: Antifa, SJWs Chalk Up Berkeley To Protest Ben Shapiro Speech

The hysteria surrounding Daily Wire editor-in-chief Ben Shapiro’s “Say No To Campus Thuggery” event at University of California Berkeley this evening is reaching fever pitch. While law enforcement encloses the campus in concrete barriers and the school shuts down parts of the university and prepares safe spaces, activists have grabbed their chalk and covered the campus with protests.

As seen in a group of photos posted online (below), activists repeat several of the common declarations from the social justice/Antifa left.

“Free speech is not hate speech,” declares one chalk message, providing the left’s rationale for shutting down speech they don’t like.

“We don’t want your racist hate,” reads another, resorting to the SJWs’ standard unfounded accusation of racism.

“Immigrants are welcome here,” one message reads in another non sequitur.

“F**k Carol Christ,” says another, referencing Berkeley’s first ever female chancellor who has become a target of the left for simply reaffirming Berkeley’s once vaunted commitment to protecting free speech.

The protests come amid extreme security measures implemented by the school, including closure of multiple buildings and parking lots and the provision safe spaces and counseling for students, faculty and staff.

The Berkeley Police Department is also implementing its own unusually drastic steps, including providing campus “walking escorts” and alternative routes to protect people from protester violence and setting up concrete barriers all over the area to try to contain Antifa.

More details on the event:

via Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/1TJbF1r

CNN Celebrity Chef Anthony Bourdain Says He Would Poison Trump’s Food

CNN Celebrity Chef Anthony Bourdain Says He Would Poison Trump’s Food

14 Sep, 2017
14 Sep, 2017

TV foodie Anthony Bourdain told paparazzi outside an airport that if he was asked to cater a dinner for President Donald Trump, he would poison the food.

The former Food Network personality and current host of CNN’s Parts Unknown was caught outside LAX airport by a photographer for celebrity gossip website TMZ. Bourdain was asked whether or not he would go to North Korea to do a food show.

Bourdain said that everyone in North Korea is starving, so there is no reason to go there. He also called the diminutive dictator of the oppressed nation a series of obscene names, saying Kim Jong-un is a “chubby, evil little f***.”

But then the TMZ stringer asked what Bourdain would serve if he was asked to cater a dinner for President Trump.

Bourdain answered simply, “Hemlock,” appearing to admit he would poison the president if given the chance.

VIDEO

The TMZ reporter also asked about what the TV chef thinks of the president’s tweets, but all Bourdain gave was a shrug of his shoulders.

This isn’t the first time the TV food personality spoke about dining with the president. Last year, Bourdain said he would “absolutely f*cking not” dine with Trump.

Also in 2016, Bourdain insisted that he would boycott the restaurant in Trump’s Washington D.C. hotel.

“I will never eat in his restaurant,” Bourdain said right after Trump won the White House. “I have utter contempt for him, utter and complete contempt.”

 

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://ift.tt/uktKj3

Sex robots are on the rise — but are they beneficial to society?

What is a sex robot?

Sex robots are anatomically correct hyperrealistic dolls that mimic human movements to create the experience of being with a real human. Some have extra features, such as built-in heaters to simulate body warmth, sensors that react to touch, and the ability to speak, give specific voice-activated responses, smile, and even sing.

How much do they cost?

A standard sex robot starts around $6,000, and can range up to $12,000 or more, depending on extra features added. Robots that are custom made to a client’s specifications can be even more expensive. Harmony, one prototype set to release later this year, already has a set price of $15,000. The first AI sex robot was made a few years ago, and due to popularity, more technology companies are investing in the specialized robot industry.

What the experts are saying

● “With AI particularly, one of the things we realize in psychology is that sometimes just because we can do something doesn’t mean we should do it and I think sex dolls are a perfect example. We’re objectifying women, but worse than that, we’re commercializing them — becoming consumers of women’s bodies in this way.” — British psychologist Emma Kenney

● “If we are talking about individuals who are not only disabled but have been traumatized, in some ways this could be a beneficial instrument, if you will, to help them in their [sexual] healing process… You have to strike a balance between lack of regulation – so we have all different uses and personifications of children and women as sexual objects – or you have overregulation and you stifle the technology.” —Dr Aimee van Wynsberghe, assistant professor in ethics and technology at Delft University of Technology

● “We have already seen rapid changes in human relationships thanks to the internet, mobile devices and social media. The next major advance will enable us to use our technology to have intimate encounters with the technology itself – to fall in love with the technology, to have sex with robots and to marry them.” — David Levy, artificial intelligence expert and author of the book “Love and Sex” with Robots

● “Sex with a robot is just a fake imitation. And it can lead to psychopathic disorders and isolation… Sex with robots won’t bring into a person’s life the emotion effect that gives us a true communion. You can eat pseudo-food to still hunger. But over time, it will still end badly.” — Sexologist Lev Shcheglov

A real life experience

One sex robot user, Arran Wright, appeared on the British talk show “This Morning” to explain his typical day-to-day with his sex robot, Samantha. He told the co-hosts that the sex robot often spends time with his wife and kids, who ask for her.

“When I put her in the car, they really enjoy it,” Wright said.

via TheBlaze.com – Stories

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: http://www.theblaze.com