Questions Mount as Ukrainian Airliner Crashes in Iran, Killing All Onboard, Hours After Missile Attack

KYIV, Ukraine—A Ukrainian International Airlines Boeing 737-800 crashed Wednesday morning only minutes after takeoff from Tehran and only hours after Iran launched a barrage of ballistic missiles at U.S. forces based in neighboring Iraq.

Data from Flightradar24, a website that tracks aircraft, indicates the Ukrainian airliner crashed roughly two minutes after taking off from Imam Khomeini International Airport bound for Kyiv just after 6 a.m. local time. The plane reached about 8,000 feet in altitude. 

All 176 passengers and crew on board the Ukrainian airliner died, Iranian officials say. 

Among the dead are 82 Iranians, 63 Canadians, and 11 Ukrainians, and 10 Swedes, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko tweeted early Wednesday.  Also dead are four Afghans, three Germans, and three British nationals.

About four hours earlier, Iran launched 15 ballistic missiles against bases housing U.S. troops in Iraq. 

According to Iraq’s military, the missiles landed between 1:45 and 2:15 a.m. local time. No Americans have been reported injured or killed in that attack, U.S. officials say.

The Ukrainian Embassy in Tehran initially said in a statement on its website that the crash of the Ukrainian airliner probably was not caused by a terrorist attack or a missile. 

However, the embassy subsequently retracted that statement and now says it isn’t clear what caused the crash.

Ukrainian International Airlines announced it was suspending all flights to Tehran “until further notice.” The Ukrainian Aviation Administration banned all flights in Iranian airspace.

Iranian officials immediately said the crash was caused by a mechanical malfunction, specifying that one of the airliner’s two turbofan engines caught fire shortly after takeoff. 

Aviation experts note, however, that it typically takes weeks or months of investigations to determine the cause of an aircraft crash.

Iranian personnel reportedly have found the downed plane’s two black boxes, but they so far refuse to hand them over to Boeing, according to news reports.

John Venable, senior research fellow for defense policy at The Heritage Foundation,  cautioned that it’s too early to tell what brought down the Ukrainian airliner down. 

However, Venable, a former U.S. Air Force F-16 pilot with 3,000 hours of fighter time, also told The Daily Signal that he was alarmed by the continuation of civilian air traffic in Iran throughout Wednesday morning.

“The extreme political tensions of the evening made the risk of air defense systems on either side misidentifying and inadvertently shooting down an airliner filled with innocents very real,” Venable said.

The Boeing 737-800 aircraft that went down was delivered direct to Ukraine International Airlines from the manufacturer in 2016. The aircraft had no known mechanical faults and had passed an inspection Jan. 6, Ukrainian officials said.

The single-aisle Boeing 737-800 is an earlier model of the 737-MAX aircraft, which was grounded after two fatal crashes last year. The 737-800 does not carry the flawed anti-stall software deemed responsible for the MAX crashes.

Ukrainian International Airlines representatives also downplayed the possibility of human error, saying the crew onboard the downed aircraft was highly experienced and had received the proper amount of rest prior to the flight. 

An investigation will determine the cause of the crash, Ukrainian officials said.

Some U.S. aviation experts initially were skeptical about the possibility that Iranian air defenses may have brought down the Ukrainian airliner, mistaking it for an American warplane.

However, the timing of the Ukrainian airliner’s crash just hours after the Iranian missile strike into neighboring Iraq has raised questions about why civilian aircraft were still flying from Tehran’s international airport Wednesday morning, given that Iran’s air defense network was certainly on high alert for U.S. retaliatory airstrikes.

Before Wednesday, some airlines already had canceled flights into both Iranian and Iraqi airspace due to escalated military tensions between Washington and Tehran. According to Ukrainian news reports, though, other airlines such as Turkish Airlines, Pegasus,  AtlasGlobal, and Qatar Airlines all had continued flights into Tehran after Iran launched the missiles.

By allowing commercial air traffic to go on unabated Wednesday, Iran may have been looking for an American misstep, Heritage’s Venable said.

“Iran’s decision to let airline operations go unfettered could have been mere incompetency,” Venable said, adding:

Or, it could have been on the hope that an American miscalculation would bring down an airliner and deliver a public affairs nightmare for the United States, giving Iran a political victory where they stood no chance of gaining one from their military. Either way, the world should take note.

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration issued a prohibition on Wednesday banning U.S. aircraft from operating in Iraq, Iran, the Persian Gulf, and Gulf of Oman, citing “heightened military activities and increased political tensions in the Middle East, which present an inadvertent risk to U.S. civil aviation operations due to the potential for miscalculation or misidentification.”

Most U.S. carriers already avoided the region, according to Keith Mackey, an aviation safety consultant who has more than 30,000 hours of pilot flight time in aircraft such as the Boeing 747 and Airbus A-300.

“When you fly over a war zone, you’re at risk,” Mackey told The Daily Signal in a telephone interview.

Mackey noted that, based on available flight data, the crashed Ukrainian airliner had a normal climbout, which did not indicate a mechanical problem from the flight’s outset.

“Something took place in a very short length of distance and time to cause the plane to go down,” Mackey said.

He added that, in his opinion, commercial flights should not have continued at Tehran’s Imam Khomeini International Airport following the missile launches.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was in Oman on an official visit, departed for Kyiv on Wednesday after learning about the crash.

Zelenskyy wrote on Facebook: 

Scary news from the Middle East. This morning, after taking off from Imam Khomeini International Airport (Tehran), the passenger aircraft of Ukraine International Airlines crashed—crashed near the airport. According to preliminary reports, all passengers and crew were killed. Our embassy clarifies information about the circumstances of the tragedy and the death toll.

In Ukraine, the crash conjured memories of the July 2014 shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 by Russian forces over the eastern Ukrainian warzone.

According to multiple independent investigations, a Russian BUK surface-to-air missile, operated by a Russian military crew, shot down the Boeing 777 airliner, killing all 298 passengers and crew onboard. That incident increased worldwide restrictions on civilian airliners flying near active combat areas.

Iran’s missile attack marked the latest escalation of a monthslong, tit-for-tat military standoff between Iran and the U.S.

On Dec. 27, Iran’s proxy militants in Iraq attacked a U.S. military base in the country, killing an American contractor. Following a retaliatory U.S. airstrike, Iran-backed protesters stormed the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Responding to those acts of Iranian aggression, President Donald Trump authorized a targeted drone airstrike Jan. 3 that killed Qassim Suleimani, commander since 1998 of Iran’s Quds Force, the unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps that conducts military and spy operations outside Iran.

Suleimani was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of U.S. troops during the Iraq War, U.S. officials say. And, according to the Pentagon, the Iranian major general had plans for more attacks against U.S. diplomats, service members, and other American interests, both in Iraq and elsewhere throughout the Middle East.

Trump on Wednesday called Suleimani “a ruthless terrorist.”

The post Questions Mount as Ukrainian Airliner Crashes in Iran, Killing All Onboard, Hours After Missile Attack appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Trump’s Iran Policy Isn’t the Problem; Barack Obama’s Was

This week, President Donald Trump launched a global round of teeth gnashing when he ordered the killing of the greatest terrorist leader in the modern Middle East, Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani.

Suleimani was unquestionably responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans in Iraq and thousands of others throughout the Middle East — mostly Muslim. His global terror network ran from South America to Europe to Africa to Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq. Suleimani was an unparalleled organizer and a pitiless murderer. His death was richly earned.

But for many in the media and on the domestic and international left, Trump’s action was precipitously “provocative.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Suleimani ‘s killing — which came directly after a Suleimani -approved terror assault on America’s embassy in Baghdad and amidst reported further plans for escalated terror against American targets — “disproportionate.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., suggested that Trump, not the Iranians, had “escalated” the situation. Former Vice President Joe Biden said that Trump had “just tossed a stick of dynamite into a tinderbox.”

This reaction has been magnified by the media, many of whom have been speculating about the possibility of all-out war between the United States and Iran. Think pieces have been written about whether the United States will reactivate the draft (spoiler alert: No, we won’t). Musings have filled the newspapers about the supposed conflagration prompted not by Iranian evil but by Trumpian reactivity.

All of this smacks less of legitimate concern about what comes next than it does of sheer panic that Trump has overturned a decade of American and European appeasement of the Iranian regime.

Ben Rhodes, former President Obama’s deputy national security adviser, architect of the Iran deal and an overt liar who told the American public that Iran was on its way to moderation if only the United States would loosen economic restrictions on the terror state, has placed blame for volatility squarely before Trump.

Susan Rice, Obama’s national security adviser during the Iran deal and another overt liar who told the American public that Islamic terror against our Benghazi embassy was rooted in anger over a YouTube video, soberly informed Americans that “Americans would be wise to brace for war.” Biden suggested that in throwing out the Iran deal, Trump had paved the way for war — and, oh, by the way, the Iran deal was “airtight.”

This is a deliberate misreading of history designed to absolve the Obama administration of its Iran policy debacle.

The administration pursued a policy of strengthening Iran economically — and did so while openly acknowledging that Iran would use that newly gained economic strength to pursue terrorism and ballistic missile testing. In speaking of the sanctions relief given to Iran, then-Secretary of State John Kerry explained in January 2016, “I think that some of it will end up in the hands of the IRGC or other entities, some of which are labeled terrorists.”

That’s precisely what happened. In March 2016, then-U.S. Central Command nominee Army Gen. Joseph Votel said that Iran had become “more aggressive” since the advent of the nuclear deal. Indeed, Iran has built up Hezbollah in Lebanon, propped up Bashar Assad in Syria, increased its presence in Iraq and bolstered its war in Yemen. In the past few months, Iran and its proxies have attacked shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, Saudi oil facilities, an American drone and an American embassy, among other targets. All of this occurred while the Trump administration did little or nothing in response.

Then Trump ordered the killing of Suleimani. Suddenly, we have been informed by dishonest Democrats and their media allies, Iran has gone rogue.

Nonsense. Iran has been rogue for decades. The Iran deal was simply an attempt to whistle past the graveyard with the terror regime — to pay it off long enough so that President Barack Obama could declare the problem handled. This was, after all, the Obama strategy in Crimea and Syria: Declare a red line; run away from it; pretend that pusillanimous inaction is bravery and deterrence provocation.

Trump thought differently. Now Iran has come face to face with the prospect that actions have consequences — and those consequences don’t involve pallets of cash being shipped over to fund terror organizations that span the globe.

COPYRIGHT 2020 CREATORS.COM

The post Trump’s Iran Policy Isn’t the Problem; Barack Obama’s Was appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

Pelosi Responds to Iran Attack by Blaming US for ‘Needless Provocations’

News

Pelosi Responds to Iran Attack by Blaming US for ‘Needless Provocations’

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi holds a media conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2019.(Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty ImagesSpeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi holds a media conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2019. (Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday responded to Iran’s missile attacks on military bases in Iraq housing U.S. troops by blaming the Trump administration.

Even as U.S. officials were uncertain of the damage done by the roughly 15 missiles that slammed into two bases housing U.S. personnel, Pelosi was tweeting her criticism of President Donald Trump.

“Closely monitoring the situation following bombings targeting U.S. troops in Iraq,” she tweeted. “We must ensure the safety of our servicemembers, including ending needless provocations from the Administration and demanding that Iran cease its violence. America & world cannot afford war.”

TRENDING: Comedian George Lopez on Iran’s ‘Bounty’ on Trump: ‘We’ll Do It for Half’

The tweet irked Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, who said Wednesday on “Fox & Friends” that Tuesday was the wrong time to play politics.

“You know, at the time when Americans are having missiles raining down on them, we should actually rally around the flag. There is plenty of time for politics. We have a whole year until the election,” Kinzinger said.

“But, during that, for the speaker to basically — in essence — accuse the president for these missiles coming down on the American soldiers is something I think they are going to regret,” he said.

Kinzinger then addressed the widespread condemnation from Democrats of the drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force.

Is Nancy Pelosi fit to be speaker of the House?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

“They are going to regret their — basically — opposition to this strike. They are going to regret all this stuff when it comes to November,” he said.

Anyone blaming America for Iran’s escalation of tensions does not understand the region’s history, the Illinois Republican said.

“This is what’s amazing to me,” he said, “You know, this idea that this was America’s fault. That it wasn’t our mistake in leaving Iraq that actually led to this in the first place.”

Kinzinger said he was disappointed that politics overshadowed patriotism in the partisan response to the drone strike that killed Soleimani.

“I supported Obama when he took big actions that we needed to. They don’t think that way,” he said. “And, that is why it’s important for us to stand together and also not to leave Iraq. To stand with the Iraqi people who really do want us there and not their puppet government that exists to this day.”

RELATED: Nancy Pelosi Announces Attempt To Clamp Down on Trump with War Powers Resolution

Depending upon what damage was done, the U.S. may have the chance to “kind of walk back from this cliff that Iran has brought us to,” he said.

“So, now is the moment where I think the president — whatever he does — he will have the information. He’ll make the right decision. Hopefully, we are walking back from Iran’s escalation, but we can finish any fight,” Kinzinger said.

House Armed Services Committee member Rep. Michael Waltz, a Florida Republican, told reporters that assessing the damage and Iran’ s intent will guide America’s response.

“What I’m watching for as these missiles fall as we speak are, are they hitting infrastructure or are they specifically trying to target Americans and kill Americans,” Waltz said, as Fox reported. “If they’re hitting infrastructure, that could be a signal that while they had to respond they did so in a way that would lead to future de-escalation. But Trump has [said] if you kill Americans like Iran has done since 1979, there will be serious consequences and he’ll hold Iran responsible, not the proxies.”

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Cruz: Missiles Fired by Iran on U.S. Base ‘Paid for by the Billions the Obama Administration Flooded the Ayatollah With’

Tuesday during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-AZ) discussed the surface-to-surface missile attack by Iran on a U.S. military base in Iraq.

Cruz maintained Trump was justified in ordering the airstrike on Iranian general Qasam Soleimani. He added that Democrats and the media speculating about World War III was a product of their hysteria and anti-Trump fervor.

The Texas Republican went on to suggest those missiles that struck the U.S. base were financed by money delivered to Iran as a result of the nuclear deal brokered during the previous Obama administration.

“If you look at Iran policy, I think you’ve seen a dramatic shift,” he said. “Under Barack Obama, as you noted, the policy was appeasement. The policy under the disastrous Iran nuclear deal under Obama was to give over $100 billion to Iran. They literally flew $1.7 billion in cash, in unmarked bills on pallettes in the dead of night into Iran. In a very real sense, the missiles that we saw fired on U.S. servicemen and women tonight were paid for by the billions the Obama administration flooded the Ayatollah with. If history teaches anything, it’s don’t give billions of dollars to people who hate you and want to kill you.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

‘TELL HIM I’LL CALL HIM BACK:’ Pelosi Too Busy to Take VP Pence’s Call To Inform Her Of Iranian Missile Attack On Americans

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi demands to be in control all the time. In fact, after the House voted to approve two articles of impeachment against President Trump, she refused to hand them over to the Senate, demanding to play a role even after the House’s job was completely done.

So Vice President Mike Pence called Pelosi, the third-ranking member of government, on Tuesday night to inform her that Iran was launching missiles on U.S. forces in Iraq.

“Tell him I’ll call him back,” Pelosi said, according to a Politico reporter.

“In meeting tonight Speaker Pelosi was handed a note telling her VP Pence was on the phone,” Heather Caygle wrote on Twitter. “‘Tell him I’ll call him back,’ she said according to sources in room, noting she had to go open the House for new session.

“Two minutes later, she was handed note about air base bombing,” Caygle wrote.

After President Trump ordered the U.S. military to take out Iran’s secretive Quds Force commander, Qassim Suleimani, Pelosi said he should have first asked Congress for permission.

“We cannot put the lives of American servicemembers, diplomats and others further at risk by engaging in provocative and disproportionate actions,” Pelosi said on Thursday night. “Tonight’s airstrike risks provoking further dangerous escalation of violence. America –- and the world -– cannot afford to have tensions escalate to the point of no return.”

“The Administration has conducted tonight’s strikes in Iraq targeting high-level Iranian military officials and killing Iranian Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran. Further, this action was taken without the consultation of the Congress.”

Washington Examiner writer Byron York noted the disconnect after Pelosi refused Pence’s call.

“Speaker Pelosi doesn’t like it when the administration doesn’t give her foreign policy updates. So VP Pence calls with word of Iran missile attack. ‘Tell him I’ll call him back,’ Pelosi says,” he wrote on Twitter.

Later on Tuesday, Pelosi wrote on Twitter: “Closely monitoring the situation following bombings targeting U.S. troops in Iraq. We must ensure the safety of our servicemembers, including ending needless provocations from the Administration and demanding that Iran cease its violence. America & world cannot afford war.”

Shortly before her tweet was posted, it was reported Pelosi was busy at a restaurant opening.

RELATED: WOW! Pelosi Is Partying at Danny Meyer’s Maialino Mare Restaurant as Iran Bombs US Troops in Iraq

The post ‘TELL HIM I’LL CALL HIM BACK:’ Pelosi Too Busy to Take VP Pence’s Call To Inform Her Of Iranian Missile Attack On Americans appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Hypocritical Dems Trash Trump but Are Fine with Obama’s 2,800 Strikes Congress Didn’t Approve

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democratic leaders are decrying President Donald Trump’s use of force against Iranian Quds force commander Qassem Soleimani without congressional authorization but allowed former President Barack Obama free rein to carry out military operations.

Obama oversaw military actions in both Syria and Libya for months without seeking the approval of Congress.

The Washington Times reported in April 2015 that U.S. strikes against Islamic State targets in Syria and Iraq surpassed 2,800 by that point in the conflict.

“The U.S. military has been conducting strikes in Iraq for 10 months, and began striking directly at targets in Syria last September as part of Mr. Obama’s announced campaign to degrade the capabilities of the Islamic State,” according to The Times.

By mid-April 2015, the U.S. had carried out 1,458 strikes in Iraq and 1,343 in Syria.

TRENDING: Kathy Griffin Tries To Steal Back New Year’s Eve Thunder on Twitter, 2 Million ‘Fans’ Could Care Less

Obama pointed to his powers as commander in chief, as well as the September 2001 “Authorization for Use of Military Force” resolution passed by Congress, which recognizes, “the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States.”

The Obama administration also relied on the 2002 AUMF resolution calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein as leader of Iraq.

The Times reported that Obama continued his military campaign in Iraq and Syria, even after a new authorization for the use of force against the Islamic State was introduced, but had not been passed by Congress.

While ISIS was certainly a purveyor of terrorism, some of which was directed at the U.S., such was not the case when Obama decided to commit the American military to assist in the toppling of Libyan leader Colonel Moammar Gadhafi in 2011.

Do you think Trump made the right call taking out Soleimani?

0% (0 Votes)

0% (0 Votes)

The Washington Post reported in June 2011, nearly three months into the air campaign, that the Obama administration had yet to seek congressional approval.

The president did not comply with the 1973 War Powers Resolution, otherwise known as the War Powers Act, by either obtaining congressional authorization for the military action or pulling U.S. forces out of the conflict within 60 days of committing them.

Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state during the operation, said in October 2011 regarding Gaddafi’s overthrow, “We came, we saw, he died,” mimicking Roman Emperor Julius Caesar’s famous line, “veni, vidi, vici.”

That was then; this is now.

Suddenly with one voice Democrats are concerned that Trump overstepped his authority as commander in chief by green-lighting the killing of Soleimani in Baghdad, just days after our embassy was attacked and Americans were killed and injured by Iranian backed forces.

RELATED: DeSoto: Baghdad Attack Confirms Key Difference Between Trump and Obama Is Sheer Competence

In a letter to her Democratic colleagues on Sunday, Pelosi wrote that this week that the House will introduce a war powers resolution “mandating that if no further Congressional action is taken, the Administration’s military hostilities with regard to Iran cease within 30 days.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer charged on Friday that Trump has no authority for a war with Iran.

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin and Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia have introduced a war powers resolution seeking to block further acts by Trump directed at Iran.

“The resolution requires that any hostilities with Iran must be explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force, but does not prevent the United States from defending itself from imminent attack,” Durbin and Kaine said in a joint news release on Friday.

The Associated Press reported that Trump met “the 48-hour deadline required by the War Powers Act to notify Congress” via a Saturday communication, following Friday’s deadly drone strike on Soleimani, but neither Pelosi nor Schumer was satisfied.

Pelosi responded to Trump’s notification in a news release on Saturday, saying, “This classified War Powers Act notification delivered to Congress raises more questions than it answers.”

“This document prompts serious and urgent questions about the timing, manner and justification of the Administration’s decision to engage in hostilities against Iran,” she continued. “The highly unusual decision to classify this document in its entirety compounds our many concerns, and suggests that the Congress and the American people are being left in the dark about our national security.”

In a Sunday letter to Trump, Schumer called for the immediate declassification of the notice president sent to Congress regarding the Soleimani strike.

All the messaging appears aimed at trying to cast doubt in the minds of the American public that Trump made the right decision to kill the man responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans and thousands of others.

After all, if Trump is a good commander in chief, protecting Americans, why in the world would the Democrats be pushing forward a purely partisan impeachment, in which they do not allege he engaged in any sort of criminal conduct?

As I have previously argued, one result of Trump’s decisive response to last week’s attack on the United States embassy in Baghdad has been to once again highlight what competent leadership looks like, particularly when compared to the actions of the Obama administration.

Unlike at the Benghazi, Libya, consulate attack in 2012, the call for U.S. military help was answered in a timely fashion. The result was no dead Americans. Further, the Trump administration was clear about who was responsible for the attack — Iran — and what the consequences would be if the aggression persisted.

The tragic result of the Obama administration’s incompetence in Benghazi was the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens.

Everything that Pelosi, Schumer and their cohort say and do should be viewed through the lens of their one and only objective: to remove Trump from office, whether by impeachment or in November’s election.

Trump made the right call to take out Soleimani, and the Democrats likely know it’s true, but their hypocrisy in the pursuit of political gain knows no bounds.

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

via The Western Journal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.westernjournal.com

Candace Owens Takes on AOC and Wins! Forces Socialist Leader Ocasio-Cortez to Unblock Her on Twitter

Candace Owens sent out a notice on Monday that she won a victory against socialist leader Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Back in July 2019 AOC discovered she was unable to defend her crackpot positions from assault by Candace Owens.
So, like a true socialist, Ocasio-Cortez decided to block the incoming assault from Candace Owens. AOC blocked her on Twitter.

Candace lawyered up — AND SHE WON!

Congratulations Candace Owens!

Dear all,

In July of 2019, a New York Federal appeals court upheld a lower court decision from 2018, which disallowed President Trump to block his critics and naysayers from his personal twitter account. This decision set a first-time precedent stipulating that “the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise‐open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees,” wrote Judge Parker, who was nominated to the appeals court by President George W. Bush.

So, you can imagine my surprise when I learned that during that same month, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez blocked me from her twitter account!

Too often it seems that the law is only applicable to one side of the political aisle. As a matter of ensuring equality, this week, I hired New York lawyer Jacob Weinstein to send Ms. Ocasio-Cortez a demand letter, highlighting our intention to litigate the matter, should she not unblock my account by end of day, January 6th 2019.

I am pleased to announce that as of writing, her lawyer has indicated that his client would concede to our demand (letter below).

This outcome is important for a few reasons:

AOC blocked me because I am without question, her toughest critic. While she uses her social media presence to pollute the youth with fraudulent promises of a socialist utopia, I have used my online presence to directly refute such patently false indications. This outcome then assures us that there will continue to be a loud answer to the far-left’s predatory misinformation campaign aimed at our youth.
It is due to your continued support of me and my various projects that we are able to set aside funding to pursue these seemingly small legal battles, that can have major outcomes in the long run. We must never allow people that wish to bring socialism to America, create pockets within society (whether online or otherwise) where their ideas can go unchecked.

Ladies and gentlemen, it is 2020. This year, everything counts. Every battle, every word, every event, and every dollar will go toward or against the future of this country. My ask of every single one of you is to make this year count. In whatever capacity you can— FIGHT.

If you would like to make a contribution to our efforts. Please consider making a donation HERE.

Onward & Upward, Patriots!

Candace Owens

The post Candace Owens Takes on AOC and Wins! Forces Socialist Leader Ocasio-Cortez to Unblock Her on Twitter appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

Fitton: Judicial Watch Finds 2.5 Million ‘Extra’ Registrants on Voting Rolls – Warns 5 States to Clean Up or Face Federal Lawsuit

One of the most important things we can do in this election year is continue to force states and counties across the nation to comply with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).

And we are. We have sent notice-of-violation letters to 19 large counties in five states that we intend to sue unless they take steps to comply with the law and remove ineligible voter registrations within 90 days. Section 8 of the act requires jurisdictions to take reasonable efforts to remove ineligible registrations from their rolls.

Despite our successful litigation to bring counties and states into compliance with the NVRA, voter registration lists across the country remain significantly out of date. According to our analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) this year, 378 counties nationwide have more voter registrations than citizens old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%.

These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark, which is a drop of about one million from our previous analysis of voter registration data. Although San Diego County removed 500,000 inactive names from voter rolls following our settlement with Los Angeles County, San Diego still has a registration rate of 117% and has one of the highest registration rates in the county.

Judicial Watch Attorney Robert Popper is the director of our Election Integrity initiative. In the latest round of warning letters, we explain that implausibly high registration rates raise legal concerns:

An unusually high registration rate suggests that a jurisdiction is not removing voters who have died or who have moved elsewhere, as required by [federal law].

Judicial Watch also considers how many registrations were ultimately removed from the voter rolls because a registrant [had moved]. If few or no voters were removed…the jurisdiction is obviously failing to comply . . . States must report the number of such removals to the EAC.

We found major voting list issues in CaliforniaPennsylvaniaNorth CarolinaVirginia, and Colorado. The following counties have excessive registration rates or have failed to cancel sufficient numbers of ineligible registrations:

  • Colorado
  • California
    • Imperial County
    • Monterey County
    • Orange County
    • Riverside County
    • San Diego County
    • San Francisco County
    • San Mateo County
    • Santa Clara County
    • Solano County
    • Stanislaus County
    • Yolo County
  • North Carolina
    • Guilford County
    • Mecklenburg County
  • Virginia
  • Pennsylvania
    • Allegheny County
    • Bucks County
    • Chester County
    • Delaware County

We are the national leader in enforcing the NVRA, which requires states to take reasonable steps to clean their rolls.

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a massive voter roll cleanup that resulted from our settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. California also settled a similar lawsuit with us that last year began the process of removing up to 1.5 million “inactive” names from Los Angeles County voting rolls. Kentucky also began a cleanup of up to 250,00 names last year after it entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch lawsuit.

Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections and we will insist, in court if necessary, that states follow federal law to clean up their voting rolls. Our previous lawsuits have already led to major cleanups in California, Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio – but more needs to be done. It is common sense that voters who die or move away be removed from the voting rolls.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Nolte: Preliminary Golden Globes Ratings Hit Another Low

Preliminary numbers show that the 77th Golden Globes telecast suffered a six-percent ratings dive Sunday night.

Last year’s show was the lowest rated in a decade. This one is even lower.

Keep in mind that these are preliminary numbers, which could go up or down after the full and final numbers come in. We will update with the final numbers.

According to the early numbers, though, about 19 million tuned (18.95 million) in for the first half-hour, probably to see host Ricky Gervais’ monologue, which skewered Hollywood pomposity in a very satisfying way.

A mere 30 minutes later, though, at 8:30 p.m. ET, more than three million tuned out. Viewership dropped to just 15.91 million as Gervais ceded the stage to one pompous, left-wing Hollywood celebutard after another who used the spotlight to preen their self-importance and lecture the rest of us about important social issues ‘n stuff.

In fact, the show shed viewers every half hour. By 10:30 p.m. only 11.22 million were still watching, only a bit more than half the number of those who originally tuned in to see Gervais rip the hypocrites in Woke Hollywood.

It’s not supposed to work that way. As the night wears on and the awards are handed out in increasingly important categories –Best Picture, Actor, Actress — you would think more people would tune to see the winners and the “Big Stars.” At the very least, you would think the audience would hold on.

Nope.

About 8 million people, roughly 45 percent of viewers, were apparently so turned off by all the celebutard screeching about Trump and abortion and the global warming hoax, they voted with their remote controls.

The overall number for the full telecast averages out to 14.8 million viewers and a 3.8 rating in the advertiser-coveted 18-49 age demo.

Last year, the telecast drew 15.73 million viewers and a 4.5 rating in the age demo.

Sycophants in the entertainment media, like Deadline, are blaming this rating drop on nonsense like a “smaller NFL game lead-in boost.” You see, it’s their job to pretend everyone loves left-wing Hollywood’s preaching and to ignore the fact that a stupid football game had nothing to do with the show losing more than 45 percent of its audience over three hours as the shrill celebutarding grew more and more off-putting.

Ratings for these award shows are all hitting record lows. There’s just no doubt the American people are becoming more and more disgusted with our hideously arrogant and divisive celebrity class. Every year, as they burrow deeper in their velvet echo chamber, celebrities grow more insulated, mean-spirited, unhinged, and dumb. Who wants to watch that, especially when you don’t have to?

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com