Category: US Politics

A lot of people complain that Christmas is really a pagan holiday that’s been refitted for Christianity but, for me, that’s a feature not a bug.

For me, the birth of Christ — the incarnation of God’s Logos — the moment when the God we can’t see became visible and the God we can’t understand made Himself known — is like a spiritual atom bomb going off in history. After the blast, there’s all sorts of immediate effects: healing, miracles, the resurrection, crazy behavior like believers sitting on poles and handling snakes and speaking in tongues.

But over time, the radiation — or in this case, the radiance — spreads out and covers everything, permeates everything, transforms everything into a vehicle for itself.

History becomes new. We suddenly understand it as the events leading up to the arrival of the Christ child and the years of Our Lord leading away to the second coming.

Religion is changed. What was once an endless series of appeals and sacrifices by man to God becomes instead a vehicle of the Good News about the one sacrifice God made for man. It’s still religion. It’s still full of rules and doctrines and theories. But now those rules and doctrines and theories carry and spread the Good News and are only valid insofar as they contain the Good News.

And yes, holidays are transformed. A brute celebration of a physical event like the winter solstice becomes instead a joyous commemoration of the dawning of the Light of the World.

But the birth of Christ, like the birth of any man, is only the beginning.

A friend of mine recently made a wonderful observation about the Nicene Creed, the statement of basic Christian beliefs. He pointed out that Christ’s life is missing. One section of the creed declares that Christians believe Jesus “came down from heaven; he became incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary, and was made man. He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate…”

Everything Jesus did and said vanishes between the period of one sentence and the start of another. My friend said it was as if they offered us the bread of a sandwich, but not the meat.

I sometimes fear too many of us believe, so to speak, in the bread of life, but not the life itself. We’re very swift to argue with one another over doctrine, but a little slow to go back and puzzle over what Jesus was actually trying to tell us. I don’t mean taking phrases out of context as a way to attack people we disagree with. I mean listening with full attention as the Logos of God tries to teach us how to align ourselves with Him.

Jesus said stuff. He told us to do stuff. He said, “Judge not lest you be judged.” He said, “Let him who is without sin throw the first stone.” I don’t think He was speaking in some kind of clever code when He said those things. I think He meant what He said exactly.

He told us to love God and love our neighbor — and to love our enemies, too, so that we’ll be children of our Father in heaven who causes the sun to rise on the evil and the good alike. God loves His human creation, in other words, and He wants us to act like His children and love it too.

I don’t think Jesus said these things so we would feel bad when we inevitably failed to do them. I don’t think he said them so we could dissect and twist them and make them mean something else. And I definitely don’t think he said them so we can throw them in one another’s faces.

I think he said them because he wanted to teach us joy. He wanted to tell us that when you attune your heart to the immensity of God’s love, you become joyful, and more joyful every day. I don’t mean happy. Happiness comes and goes. I mean abundantly alive, vitally present, crazily grateful to be even in this vale of tears.

At Christmas, what was once a celebration of the light of the sun and the abundant life it gives the Earth, becomes instead a commemoration of the Light of the World and the abundant life He offered all of us. Not just in His birth, because His birth was only the beginning. Not just in His death, though His death was not the end. His life, His works, His words  — these are the contents of the Incarnation. These are the gifts of Christmas.

Heaven and Earth will pass away, but those words will never pass away. The gift of joy is for us, and no one can take it from us. So let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. Rejoice. Rejoice evermore.

And have a merry Christmas.

via The Daily Wire

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailywire.com

Mohamed Ahmed Al-Hashemi; photo: AZ police taken from prior arrest

An Arizona state trooper shot and killed a Qatari man who violently attacked him during a traffic stop, and it was all caught on the police dash cam.

25-year-old Mohamed Ahmed Al-Hashemi, who was in the US on a student visa, threw a street sign onto a road in Phoenix last Thursday, sparking a violent confrontation with the officer.

Trooper Hugh Grant ordered Al-Hashemi to pick up the sign, but he refused to obey commands even as the trooper ordered him to stop walking in the middle of the street.

Al-Hashemi then approached the police car and kicked the front grill.

The trooper used a stun gun to subdue Al-Hashemi but it didn’t stop him from rushing the officer and violently punching and kicking him.

After over a minute of fighting, the trooper, who was in a fight for his life had no choice but to fire his weapon, killing Al-Hashemi.

The dashboard cam shows the violent encounter and Trooper Grant was even thrown to the ground at one point.

Al-Hashemi was screaming the entire time he kicked and punched the officer.

The state trooper also had a female ride-along in the car from MADD [Mothers Against Drunk Driving] so he feared for her safety as well.

AP with the backstory on Al-Hashemi’s prior arrest:

Authorities said they didn’t know if Al-Hashemi was impaired. The trooper had injuries to his face and head and is resting at home.

Authorities say Al-Hashemi was arrested for trespassing at the Islamic Community Center of Tempe on Wednesday. Police in the Phoenix suburb of Tempe responded to a disturbance at the mosque around 4:30 a.m. At the center’s request, officers gave Al-Hashemi a warning and told him not to return, police spokesman Greg Bacon said.

Al-Hashemi returned in the early afternoon and officers were called again. Bacon said he was then arrested on a misdemeanor charge of trespassing and booked into jail.

It’s unclear how long Al-Hashemi has been living in the U.S. He was a former student at Arizona State University, which is based in Tempe, according to school officials. They didn’t provide other details.

Watch the dramatic dash cam footage (shots fired at the 2:38 mark):

The post Dramatic Video Shows Muslim in US on Student Visa Violently Attack Arizona State Trooper, Forcing Officer to Shoot and Kill Him (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

via The Gateway Pundit

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com

ROME — An Italian exorcist has denounced a steady rise in demonic activity as more and more young people abandon traditional spirituality and dabble in the occult.

“Satanism is getting much more aggressive and also diffused,” Dominican Father Francois Dermine told Crux, an online Catholic news outlet.

“Secularization leaves a void,” said the priest, who has worked as an exorcist for the Archdiocese of Ancona-Osimo since 1994. “Young people do not have anything to satisfy their spiritual and profound needs. They are thirsting for something, and the Church is not attractive anymore.”

Since the Church is no longer perceived as a valid option for many young people looking for answers, he said, “they try to find something elsewhere. This something is, many times, the demonic world.”

Satanism takes many forms, Dermine said, and many become exposed to it through forms of occult activity that seem harmless at first. Through these activities, young people risk acquiring “a Satanist mentality” in which familiarity with the demonic world becomes normalized.

“There are many groups of satanism,” the priest said, and Satanism often begins with seemingly innocuous games like the “Charlie Charlie challenge,” in which players attempt to summon a malignant Mexican spirit by balancing two pencils in the form of a cross and posing yes/no questions to “Charlie.”

This sort of game introduces children to the occult early, and such practices are becoming more widespread, Dermine said.

As an example, the priest cited the recent publication of A Children’s Book of Demons, a manual that gives kids instructions on how to summon up demons.

As Breitbart News reported last week, the International Association of Exorcists (AIE) has issued a statement warning parents of the dangers the book, which targets children aged 5-10.

The book was written by Aaron Leighton, an illustrator and “fan” of occult practices and invites children to call forth demons as a way of dealing with unpleasant problems such as chores, homework, and getting rid of bullies.

“Satanism is not always so explicit, but it is becoming more and more so, and the publication of this book is a sign of this,” Father Dermine told Crux, observing that up until a few years ago such a would have been inconceivable.

As an explanation for the growth of interest in the demonic, Dermine points to the breakdown of stable structures such marriages and families, as well as a deterioration of education.

If children had received love in their own families, “it would be much more difficult to follow these kinds of ideologies,” he said. “It would be much more difficult to penetrate their minds.”

“If the adult world does not offer alternatives, it is more difficult for younger generations to adopt a stable way of life. It’s very difficult, it’s almost a miracle,” he said.

Although many adults try to dismiss occultism as a harmless fad, Dermine insists it is very real and very dangerous.

“It’s not only a vague fear, it’s a very concrete risk,” he said. “We must not underestimate this, because violence among young people is becoming more and more diffused.”

“A violent mentality is very dangerous for our society, very, very dangerous,” he said. “Our society risks collapse if it continues like this.”

Follow @tdwilliamsrome.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Joey Mucha’s arcade rental business in San Francisco grew out of his love for Skee-ball. For the last five years, he has been renting Skee-ball and other machines out of a warehouse in the Mission District. Recently, Murcha decided to convert the space into an arcade/restaurant that would be open]]>

via Hotair

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://hotair.com/feed/

The war on Christmas marches on. Secularists — let’s say it: atheists — are leaving no stone unturned. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch said “Merry Christmas” in an interview on Fox & Friends. Leftists pounced, complaining this was a “talking point for the GOP.” Hollywood sees that old-time religion as a relentless nightmare of oppression. Christmas makes them want to tear the roof off of a Nativity set. So they vent through entertainment television.

via NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.newsbusters.org/

Blexit founder Candace Owens told Breitbart News on Friday that the Democrats proposing “reparations” for black Americans is an “obvious scam” meant for pandering ahead of an election cycle. “They think black Americans are stupid,” said Owens of Democrat politicians.

“I spoke specifically about reparations because it’s just one of the most obvious scams that’s before us, in terms of saying that this is something they want to suddenly take a look at — ahead of an election cycle.” said Owens of her September testimony before a House Oversight Joint Subcommittee Hearing.

Breitbart News caught up with Owens at Turning Point USA’s fifth annual Student Action Summit in West Palm Beach, Florida on Friday.

“This is exactly the sort of pandering that I speak out against,” added Owens of the Democrats’ reparations proposal. “They think black Americans are stupid. They think that we’re emotional. They don’t think that we understand that what we need are better policies, not more handouts.”

“Handouts amount to absolutely nothing,” said Owens. “If they did, black America would be wealthy today, because the welfare industry — 22 trillion dollars has gone into it, and black Americans are poorer today than when it began. So, I speak out against all of that trickery that comes from the left, and that rhetoric ahead of any election cycle.”

Owens added that President Trump reaches black Americans because he doesn’t play race games.

Watch below:

Matt Perdie

“I don’t think [President Trump] focuses on any one group in America,” said Owens. “He just believes in America, and that’s really all it takes to uplift groups that, in the past, have not been uplifted — to not play the race games — just say, you know what, I’m going to bring jobs to America. You know what, I’m going to tackle illegal immigration.”

“Which, we know is one of the biggest issues harming black America,” added Owens of illegal immigration. “Black American men between the ages of 18 and 21 are the people that have to directly contend and fight for jobs with illegal immigrants.”

“So it’s just his policies — which are good for the economy — that ultimately uplifted black America, and people are starting to see,” said Owens. “They accuse him of being a racist. He’s obviously not racist, because he’s uplifting all sorts of groups, just through good policies.”

You can follow Alana Mastrangelo on Twitter at @ARmastrangelo, and on Instagram.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

For at least the second significant time, an organization financed by billionaire activist George Soros released material playing a central role in directly fueling the impeachment narrative targeting President Trump.

The news media and Democrats are seizing on emails released to the Soros-funded Center for Public Integrity on Friday showing the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requested the Pentagon withhold military aid to Ukraine the same day as Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The OMB immediately pushed back explaining the aid hold was actually announced seven days prior to Trump’s July 25 phone call and that the Center for Public Integrity was harping on one line within 146 pages of documents that the organization obtained to paint an inaccurate and misleading picture of the timing of the aid hold.

The OMB strongly denied that the email, one of many, had anything to do with Trump’s phone call, explaining the communication was part of an ongoing process put into place one week early.

The email being hyped by the media shows an official with the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Mike Duffey, contacted Pentagon officials 91 minutes after Trump’s call with Zelensky to discuss withholding aid.

“Based on guidance I have received and in light of the Administration’s plan to review assistance to Ukraine, including the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, please hold off on any additional DoD obligations of these funds, pending direction from that process,” Duffey wrote, according to the documents.

Rachel Semmel, a spokeswoman for OMB, told reporters it was “reckless to tie the hold of funds to the phone call.”

“As has been established and publicly reported, the hold was announced in an interagency meeting on July 18,” she said. “To pull a line out of one email and fail to address the context is misleading and inaccurate.”

A senior administration official further said the email was part of a discussion already going on for one week between OMB and the Pentagon about withholding aid.

The documents were obtained on Friday by the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) as part of a Freedom of Information Act request to the OMB and the Department of Defense.

CPI bills itself as a nonprofit journalism organization seeking to “protect democracy and inspire change using investigative reporting that exposes betrayals of the public trust by powerful interests.” https://ift.tt/2Mo5eVu

CPI has been openly funded by Soros’s Open Society, which formally listed CPI as a media “partner.”

CPI is also funded by the Soros-financed Tides Foundation. CPI previously ran iWatchNews, which it described as “the Center’s online publication dedicated to investigative and accountability reporting.”  That project was sponsored by Soros’s Open Society as well as the Soros-funded Sunlight Foundation.

Soros, Ukraine and so-called whistleblower 

CPI is the second Soros-funded purported journalism outfit to play a key role in fueling the impeachment narrative.

Breitbart News previously reported another self-described investigative journalism organization funded by Soros’s Open Society Foundations was repeatedly referenced as a source of information in the so-called whistleblower’s official complaint alleging Trump was “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country” in the 2020 presidential race.

Indeed, the complaint relied upon information first reported by the Soros-funded group.

Also Breitbart News reported that Eric Ciaramella, whom Real Clear Investigations suggests is the likely so-called whistleblower, received emails about Ukraine policy from a top director at Soros’s Open Society Foundations.

The emails informed Ciaramella and a handful of other Obama administration foreign policy officials about Soros’s whereabouts, the contents of Soros’s private meetings about Ukraine and a future meeting the billionaire activist was holding with the prime minister of Ukraine.

The charges in the July 22 report referenced in the so-called whistleblower’s document and released by the Google and Soros-funded organization, the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), seem to be the public precursors for a lot of the so-called whistleblower’s own claims, as Breitbart News documented.

OCCRP did work with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, a program of the Center for Public Integrity in Washington, DC.

One key section of the so-called whistleblower’s document claims that “multiple U.S. officials told me that Mr. Giuliani had reportedly privately reached out to a variety of other Zelensky advisers, including Chief of Staff Andriy Bohdan and Acting Chairman of the Security Service of Ukraine Ivan Bakanov.”

This was allegedly to follow up on Trump’s call with Zelensky in order to discuss the “cases” mentioned in that call, according to the so-called whistleblower’s narrative. The complainer was clearly referencing Trump’s request for Ukraine to investigate the Biden corruption allegations.

Even though the statement was written in first person – “multiple U.S. officials told me” – it contains a footnote referencing a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP).

That footnote reads:

In a report published by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) on 22 July, two associates of Mr. Giuliani reportedly traveled to Kyiv in May 2019 and met with Mr. Bakanov and another close Zelensky adviser, Mr. Serhiy Shefir.

The so-called whistleblower’s account goes on to rely upon that same OCCRP report on three more occasions. It does so to:

• Write that Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko “also stated that he wished to communicate directly with Attorney General Barr on these matters.”
• Document that Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani “had spoken in late 2018 to former Prosecutor General Shokin, in a Skype call arranged by two associates of Mr. Giuliani.”
• Bolster the charge that, “I also learned from a U.S. official that ‘associates’ of Mr. Giuliani were trying to make contact with the incoming Zelenskyy team.” The so-called whistleblower then relates in another footnote, “I do not know whether these associates of Mr. Giuliani were the same individuals named in the 22 July report by OCCRP, referenced above.”

The OCCRP report repeatedly referenced is actually a “joint investigation by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and BuzzFeed News, based on interviews and court and business records in the United States and Ukraine.”

BuzzFeed infamously also first published the full anti-Trump dossier alleging unsubstantiated collusion between Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia. The dossier was paid for by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, and was produced by the Fusion GPS opposition dirt outfit.

The OCCRP and BuzzFeed “joint investigation” resulted in both OCCRP and BuzzFeed publishing similar lengthy pieces on July 22 claiming that Giuliani was attempting to use connections to have Ukraine investigate Trump’s political rivals.

The so-called whistleblower’s document, however, only mentions the largely unknown OCCRP and does not reference BuzzFeed, which has faced scrutiny over its reporting on the Russia collusion claims.

Meanwhile, despite the known timeline that the Trump administration’s decision to withhold Ukraine aid was taken on July 18, Senator Chuck Schumer already claimed the “explosive” email released by CPI underscored the need to call new witnesses with alleged impeachment evidence.

“If there was ever an argument that we need Mr Duffey to come and testify, this is that information. This email is explosive,” Schumer said.

“A top administration official, one that we requested, is saying, stop the aid 90 minutes after Trump called Zelensky and said keep it hush, hush. What more do you need to request a witness?” Schumer asked.

Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.

With additional reporting by Joshua Klein.

via Breitbart News

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.breitbart.com

Who is Clarence Thomas? 
Every pundit has an opinion, but few actually know him.   

Now, we all have an opportunity to hear his story in his own voice. In a remarkable documentary by Michael and Gina Pack, “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,” the famously silent justice tells his life story.  And not just the small part that everyone has an opinion about, but his whole, and wholly astonishing, story.

As memories of the facts surrounding his contentious
confirmation battle—in which Anita Hill accused him of sexual harassment and
Thomas vigorously defended himself—have faded with time, public opinion has
shifted against Thomas. 

At the time of his confirmation, the public was twice
as likely to believe Thomas over Hill (55% to 27%), and 58% favored his
confirmation.  Today, only
30% of Americans believe that he should have been confirmed, and 38% say he
should not have been.

What accounts for these changing opinions? Mostly likely
it’s the relentless effort by Thomas’s critics over the last 28 years to tell his
story in their own terms.  They lost the
battle against his confirmation, but they’ve never stopped fighting the battle
over his life story.  Until now, Thomas
has largely preferred to stay out of the fight with the exception of publishing
his memoir, “My
Grandfather’s Son,” in 2007.

Like his memoir, the documentary follows Thomas’s journey
from poverty in rural Georgia to the Supreme Court.  Along the way, he lives through segregation, starts
upon and then leaves the path to the Catholic priesthood, joins the Black Power
movement, goes to Yale Law School, hesitantly joins the Republican Party, and
marries the woman he calls “a gift from God.”   

Thomas talks about growing up speaking Geechee—a Creole language spoken by the descendants of slaves in Georgia—before Standard English.  He relives his reactions to the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, and explains how the prejudice of his fellow seminarians drove him from the church and into radical racial politics.

He describes his slow turn away from those politics and tells
how he decided to vote for Ronald Reagan. 
And, in a particularly raw moment, he reveals that the racist attacks
leveled at him ever since his confirmation continue to create fresh wounds.

Perhaps what makes Thomas’s story most interesting is that it is as much about the people in Thomas’s life as it is about him. He recounts the ways—big and small—that others shaped his life.  From Sister Mary Virgilius, his eighth-grade teacher who wouldn’t let him waste his potential, to John Danforth, who as Missouri‘s attorney general gave Thomas his first job after law school when no one else would (despite his excellent grades).

Hardly a moment goes by in the film when Thomas isn’t speaking about somebody else.

Most often, that person is Thomas’s grandfather who raised him until he later threw Thomas out of his house.  More than anything, the film is the story of how his grandfather shaped him, often against Thomas’s will, into the man he is today. Thomas’s grandfather was hardworking, fiercely independent, and strict.  He lived his life by biblical principles and the sweat of his brow, and he taught Thomas those lessons. 

His grandfather’s lessons weave through Thomas’s life as he learns, rebels against, and finally embraces them. Proverbs 22:6 seems to be the unifying theme to his story: “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.”    

Perhaps, above all else, what makes Thomas’s story so
powerful is that it’s relatable.  More
than a rags-to-riches story, it’s the story of a person struggling to reconcile
his passions with his family values and the world around him. 

After all the noise and spin continually whipped up by
pundits about Thomas, it’s refreshing to hear the man himself tell his
story.  And what a story it is.

The post Clarence Thomas Tells His Story in a New Documentary appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

After months of false starts and threats and endless posturing, Donald Trump has joined Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, becoming the third American president impeached by the House of Representatives.

Democrats started promising to do this before the president was elected. Still, it feels kind of weird, surprising, surreal even, that it actually happened. Why? Because impeachment is a terrible idea for the country.

At this point, there is no chance the Democrats can remove the president. And in trying, they will only hurt themselves. The polls are clear. Yet—and here is the fascinating part—they did it anyway.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., explained why: “The president’s continuing course of conduct constitutes a clear and present danger to democracy in America. We cannot allow this misconduct to pass. It would be a sell-out of our Constitution, our foreign policy, our national security and our democracy.”

See if you can follow his logic chain: Leaving a president in office until voters can decide to remove him from office if they want to is “a danger to democracy.”

The entire impeachment saga has become detached from reality. 

Here are the facts: Democrats do not have the votes to remove Trump from office. They never will have the votes to remove the president. The point of impeachment is to remove a president. They cannot do that. This process is doomed.

By the way, they don’t have the votes because voters don’t support it. The irony is that our democracy is working just fine. Voters support it. After a full month of watching public hearings on impeachment, Democrats have not gained support. They have lost it.

In late October, when this began, about half the country backed impeachment and 44% said they were opposed. In the most recent polling, those numbers have inverted. In other words, the more people learned about impeachment, the less they wanted impeachment. That’s not one person’s opinion. That is the sum total of the polling.

Even in the face of all the data, elite Democrats still will not admit it. They are in denial. Democratic Party cheerleader and CNN commentator Jeffrey Toobin attacked his own company’s polling when it didn’t match what he believes to be true, saying:

You see a decline from our last poll in Democratic support from 90% down to 77%. Can I just say that I don’t believe that poll for one second … The 90% to 77%. You know, it’s just I don’t believe it. Like it makes no sense that that the numbers would change like that. I mean … sometimes polls are sometimes wrong.

Why doesn’t Toobin believe it? Because he doesn’t. Says the legal analyst. I look out my window and I see the horizon. That means it’s flat. You can tell me the Earth is round. But I just don’t believe it, never mind your dumb numbers and scientific theories. I just don’t believe it.

This is the definition of ideological extremism. It’s an inability to change course no matter what the evidence tells you. At that point, this is no longer politics. We left that a long time ago. What we are seeing is religion. And, of course, being the Democratic Party, it’s always the exact opposite of what they claim it is.

As Trump noted in his recent letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “You are the ones interfering in America’s elections. You are the ones subverting American democracy. You are the ones bringing pain and suffering to the republic for your own selfish personal, political, and partisan gain.”

The public, whether they like Trump or not, agrees with that. Polling shows it.

But the Democrats can’t acknowledge that they are stuck. In 2016, even before the election, they went all-in on denouncing Trump and his supporters as beyond the pale racists not worthy of being hated.

When they lost, they refused to learn. They refused to think about why they may have lost. Instead, they moved seamlessly from calling voters who wouldn’t support them “racists” into a conspiracy about Russia that was so bizarre they could never fully explain its outlines. That collapsed, too.

But what hasn’t changed is the rage storm they’ve created with years of propaganda. Democratic leaders whipped their voters into such a frenzy that the voters can’t be pulled back now. They want blood.

The Democrats have no choice but to march forward even though it will inevitably destroy them, and they know it will.

The post Understanding Democrats’ March Toward Electoral Defeat appeared first on The Daily Signal.

via The Daily Signal

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.dailysignal.com/

via American Thinker Blog

Enjoy this article? Read the full version at the authors website: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/